2
|
Koscielny A, Widenmayer S, May T, Kalff J, Lingohr P. Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 403:255-263. [PMID: 29214543 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our retrospective analysis was to compare the results of incisional hernia repair by porcine small intestinal submucosa-derived (SIS) meshes with those obtained by alloplastic polypropylene-based (PP) meshes in comparable surgical indications by matched-pair design. We hypothesized that in incisional hernia, SIS mesh repair is associated with fewer recurrences and SSO than PP mesh repair in incisional hernias. METHODS Twenty-four matched pairs (SIS vs. PP mesh repair between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2013) were identified by matching criteria: gender, age, comorbidities, body mass index, EHS hernia classification, mesh implantation technique, CDC wound classification, and source of contamination/primary surgery leading to incisional hernia. Minimal follow-up time was 24 months. Means and standard deviations were compared by paired t test; categorial data were compared by McNemar's test. Poisson's distribution and negative binominal distribution were employed to detect significant correlation. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in the pre- and perioperative factors and the follow-up times. There were significantly more wound complications (19 vs. 12, p = 0.041), longer hospital stay (22.0 ± 6.3 vs. 12.0 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.010), and significantly more recurrent hernias (25 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.004) after SIS mesh repair. Both the Poisson's distribution and the negative binominal distribution unveiled significantly more complication points (3-6 vs. 1-2) per month after SIS mesh repair. CONCLUSION There is no advantage of SIS meshes compared to PP meshes in incisional hernia repair with different degrees of wound contamination in this matched-pair analysis. Further prospective and randomized trials or at least registry studies such as the EHS register with standardized and defined conditions are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Koscielny
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - S Widenmayer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - T May
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - J Kalff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - P Lingohr
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, van Ramshorst GH, Campanelli G, Khokha V, Moore EE, Peitzman A, Velmahos G, Moore FA, Leppaniemi A, Burlew CC, Biffl WL, Koike K, Kluger Y, Fraga GP, Ordonez CA, Novello M, Agresta F, Sakakushev B, Gerych I, Wani I, Kelly MD, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Tarasconi A, Demetrashvili Z, Lee JG, Vettoretto N, Guercioni G, Persiani R, Tranà C, Cui Y, Kok KYY, Ghnnam WM, Abbas AES, Sato N, Marwah S, Rangarajan M, Ben-Ishay O, Adesunkanmi ARK, Lohse HAS, Kenig J, Mandalà S, Coimbra R, Bhangu A, Suggett N, Biondi A, Portolani N, Baiocchi G, Kirkpatrick AW, Scibé R, Sugrue M, Chiara O, Catena F. 2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg 2017; 12:37. [PMID: 28804507 PMCID: PMC5545868 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias may be associated with worsen outcome and a significant rate of postoperative complications. There is no consensus on management of complicated abdominal hernias. The main matter of debate is about the use of mesh in case of intestinal resection and the type of mesh to be used. Wound infection is the most common complication encountered and represents an immense burden especially in the presence of a mesh. The recurrence rate is an important topic that influences the final outcome. A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bergamo in July 2013 with the aim to define recommendations for emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias in adults. This document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference approved by a WSES expert panel. In 2016, the guidelines have been revised and updated according to the most recent available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Gabrielle H van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital Beverwijk, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of General Surgery, Mozyr City Hospital, Mazyr, Belarus
| | | | - Andrew Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - George Velmahos
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Ari Leppaniemi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Walter L Biffl
- Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - Kaoru Koike
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Hospital de Clinicas, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Carlos A Ordonez
- Department of Surgery, Universidad del Valle, Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - Matteo Novello
- Department of Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Clinic, University Hospital St. George/Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Igor Gerych
- Department of Surgery 1, Lviv Regional Hospital, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | | | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG Brazil.,Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora (SUPREMA), Juiz de Fora, MG Brazil
| | - Mario Paulo Faro
- Department of General Surgery, Trauma and Emergency Surgery Division, ABC Medical School, Santo André, SP Brazil
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Maggiore Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- Department of Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Jae Gil Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- Department of Surgery, Montichiari Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Cristian Tranà
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Kenneth Y Y Kok
- Department of Surgery, RIPAS Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
| | - Wagih M Ghnnam
- Department of Surgery Mansoura, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ashraf El-Sayed Abbas
- Department of Surgery Mansoura, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Norio Sato
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- Department of Surgery, Pt. BDS Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India
| | - Muthukumaran Rangarajan
- Department of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Health City Cayman Islands, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
| | - Offir Ben-Ishay
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Abdul Rashid K Adesunkanmi
- Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Helmut Alfredo Segovia Lohse
- II Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - Jakub Kenig
- 3rd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medium, Krakow, Poland
| | - Stefano Mandalà
- Department of Surgery, G. Giglio Hospital Cefalù, Palermo, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Aneel Bhangu
- Academic Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgabaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nigel Suggett
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, New Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Rodolfo Scibé
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | | | | | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Maggiore Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nie X, Xiao D, Wang W, Song Z, Yang Z, Chen Y, Gu Y. Comparison of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa versus Polypropylene in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0135073. [PMID: 26252895 PMCID: PMC4529205 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) with polypropylene in open inguinal hernia repair. Method Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used to compare patient outcomes for the two groups via meta-analysis. Result A total of 3 randomized controlled trials encompassing 200 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in recurrence (P = 0.16), hematomas (P = 0.06), postoperative pain within 30 days (P = 0.45), or postoperative pain after 1 year (P = 0.12) between the 2 groups. The incidence of discomfort was significantly lower (P = 0.0006) in the SIS group. However, the SIS group experienced a significantly higher incidence of seroma (P = 0.03). Conclusions Compared to polypropylene, using SIS in open inguinal hernia repair is associated with a lower incidence of discomfort and a higher incidence of seroma. However, well-designed larger RCT studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Nie
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongdong Xiao
- Department of Urology Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenyue Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhicheng Song
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanwen Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Gu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, Ceccarelli G, Antinori A, Ansaloni L, Olmi S, Ferrari GC, Cuccurullo D, Baccari P, Agresta F, Vettoretto N, Piccoli M. Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]. Surg Endosc 2015; 29:2463-84. [PMID: 26139480 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4293-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Executive board of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) promoted an update of the first evidence-based Italian Consensus Conference Guidelines 2010 because a large amount of literature has been published in the last 4 years about the topics examined and new relevant issues. METHODS The scientific committee selected the topics to be addressed: indications to surgical treatment including special conditions (obesity, cirrhosis, diastasis recti abdominis, acute presentation); safety and outcome of intraperitoneal meshes (synthetic and biologic); fixing devices (absorbable/non-absorbable); abdominal border and parastomal hernia; intraoperative and perioperative complications; and recurrent ventral/incisional hernia. All the recommendations are the result of a careful and complete literature review examined with autonomous judgment by the entire panel. The process was supervised by experts in methodology and epidemiology from the most qualified Italian institution. Two external reviewers were designed by the EAES and EHS to guarantee the most objective, transparent, and reliable work. The Oxford hierarchy (OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. "The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence") was used by the panel to grade clinical outcomes according to levels of evidence. The recommendations were based on the grading system suggested by the GRADE working group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The availability of recent level 1 evidence (a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs) allowed to recommend that not only laparoscopic repair is an acceptable alternative to the open repair, but also it is advantageous in terms of shorter hospital stay and wound infection rate. This conclusion appears to be extremely relevant in a clinical setting. Indications about specific conditions could also be issued: laparoscopy is recommended for the treatment of recurrent ventral hernias and obese patients, while it is a potential option for compensated cirrhotic and childbearing-age female patients. Many relevant and controversial topics were thoroughly examined by this consensus conference for the first time. Among them are the issue of safety of the intraperitoneal mesh placement, traditionally considered a major drawback of the laparoscopic technique, the role for the biologic meshes, and various aspects of the laparoscopic approach for particular locations of the defect such as the abdominal border or parastomal hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianfranco Silecchia
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Centre of Excellence, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Faggiana 1668, 04100, Latina, LT, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Montori G, Coccolini F, Manfredi R, Ceresoli M, Campanati L, Magnone S, Pisano M, Poiasina E, Nita G, Catena F, Ansaloni L. One year experience of swine dermal non-crosslinked collagen prostheses for abdominal wall repairs in elective and emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg 2015; 10:28. [PMID: 26136817 PMCID: PMC4487506 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The approach to the abdominal wall surgical repair is dramatically changed in the last years. This study evaluates our institutional outcomes about the usage of biological meshes for abdominal wall repair in different setting: in elective surgery, in emergency surgery and in abdominal wall repair following open abdomen (OA) procedure. Methods A database was prospectively conducted (January–December 2014) and data were reviewed for patients who underwent to an abdominal wall reconstruction with swine dermal non-cross linked collagens prostheses either in elective or emergency setting, and following OA/laparostomy procedure. Demographic data, co-morbidities, indications for surgery, intra-operative details, post-operative complications and outcome (peri-operative, 3, 6, 9-months) were analyzed. Results A total of 30 cases were reported: 9 in elective surgery (Group 1), 4 in emergency surgery (Group 2) and 17 with abdominal wall closure following OA management (Group 3). Two meshes were removed: 1 in the Group 1 and 1 in the Group 3. During follow-up only one patient in the Group 3 had a recurrence of the incisional hernia. Mortality rate was 11.1 % at 3 months in Group 1, 0 % in the Group 2, and 29.4 % in peri-operative period in the Group 3. Conclusions The use of non-cross linked biological meshes can be safe and versatile in different situations from elective to emergency surgery, and also for the reconstruction of the abdominal wall after OA procedure, with an acceptable recurrence and mortality rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Roberto Manfredi
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luca Campanati
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Magnone
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michele Pisano
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Elia Poiasina
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Gabriela Nita
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- General surgery department, Ospedale Maggiore, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, van Ramshorst GH, Campanelli G, Mandalà V, Ansaloni L, Moore EE, Peitzman A, Velmahos G, Moore FA, Leppaniemi A, Burlew CC, Biffl W, Koike K, Kluger Y, Fraga GP, Ordonez CA, Di Saverio S, Agresta F, Sakakushev B, Gerych I, Wani I, Kelly MD, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Taviloglu K, Demetrashvili Z, Lee JG, Vettoretto N, Guercioni G, Tranà C, Cui Y, Kok KY, Ghnnam WM, Abbas AES, Sato N, Marwah S, Rangarajan M, Ben-Ishay O, Adesunkanmi ARK, Segovia Lohse HA, Kenig J, Mandalà S, Patrizi A, Scibé R, Catena F. WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg 2013; 8:50. [PMID: 24289453 PMCID: PMC4176144 DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Emergency repair of complicated abdominal hernias is associated with poor prognosis and a high rate of post-operative complications.A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bergamo in July 2013, during the 2nd Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery with the goal of defining recommendations for emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias in adults. This document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference approved by a WSES expert panel.
Collapse
|