Comparison of Multiparametric MRI, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, and Clinical Nomograms for Primary T and N Staging of Intermediate-to-High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is commonly used for the primary staging of prostate cancer, it may miss non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET-CT) is a promising method to detect non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes, but more data are needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center, prospective study, we enrolled patients with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy with pelvic node dissection. Before surgery, prostate imaging with mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT was used to assess lymph node involvement (LNI), extra-prostatic extension (EPE), and seminal vesicle involvement (SVI). Additionally, we used clinical nomograms to estimate the risk of these three outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients included, 61 (82%) had high-risk prostate cancer, and the rest had intermediate-risk cancer. Histopathology revealed LNI in 20 (27%) patients, SVI in 26 (35%), and EPE in 52 (70%). PSMA PET-CT performed better than mpMRI at detecting LNI (area under the curve (AUC, 95% confidence interval): 0.779 (0.665-0.893) vs. 0.655 (0.529-0.780)), but mpMRI was better at detecting SVI (AUC: 0.775 (0.672-0.878) vs. 0.585 (0.473-0.698)). The MSKCC nomogram performed well at detecting both LNI (AUC: 0.799 (0.680-0.918)) and SVI (0.772 (0.659-0.885)). However, when the nomogram was used to derive binary diagnoses, decision curve analyses showed that the MSKCC nomogram provided less net benefit than mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT for detecting SVI and LNI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

mpMRI and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT are complementary techniques to be used in conjunction for the primary T and N staging of prostate cancer.

The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The current clinical recommendations posit the deployment of specific approved radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for detecting metastatic prostate cancer during primary staging. Nevertheless, the precise efficacy of such ligands in localizing intraprostatic tumours (index tumour) and T-staging is not well established. Consequently, the objective of this inquiry is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET in the tumour staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer by means of a meta-analysis that integrates studies utilizing histological confirmation as the reference standard.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a predefined collection of search terms. These terms included 'PSMA PET', 'primary staging', and 'prostate cancer'. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated all the studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted pertinent data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Any disparities were resolved by a third reviewer. A random effects Sidik-Jonkman model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis and estimate the diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis, along with 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, an appraisal regarding the likelihood of publication bias and the impact of small-study effects was performed utilizing both Egger's test and a graphical examination of the funnel plot.

RESULTS

The present analysis comprised a total of twenty-three scientific papers encompassing 969 patients and involved their analysis by both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The results of this study demonstrated that the estimated diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI, for the detection of intraprostatic tumours, regardless of the type of PSMA-ligand, was 86% (95% CI: 76-96%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%), respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of extraprostatic extension (EPE) was 73% (95% CI: 64-82%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-85%), while the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) was 87% (95% CI: 80-93) and 90% (95% CI: 82-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation has demonstrated that PSMA PET/MRI surpasses currently recommended multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in terms of diagnostic accuracy as inferred from a notable data trajectory, whereas PSMA-PET/CT exhibited comparable diagnostic accuracy for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging compared to mpMRI. Nevertheless, the analysis has identified certain potential limitations, such as small-study effects and a potential for publication bias, which may impact the overall conclusions drawn from this study.

Magnetic resonance imaging improves the prediction of tumor staging in localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based predictors for the pretherapeutic T staging of prostate cancer and their accuracy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with 3 Tesla mpMRI, positive systematic and MR-targeted biopsy, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RPE) between 01/2016 and 12/2017 were included. MRI parameters such as measurable extraprostatic extension (EPE) (≥ 3 mm), length of (pseudo)capsular contact (LCC), invasion of neurovascular bundle (NVBI), and/or seminal vesicles lesion contact (SVC) or infiltration (SVI) were assessed and correlated to clinical and histopathological results.

RESULTS

136 men were included. In 76 cases, a pT2 stage was determined, in 29 cases a pT3a, and in 31 a pT3b stage. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for the detection of T3 by measurable EPE on MRI was 98% (CI 0.88-1) and 81% (CI 0.72-0.87). No visible NVBI was found in pT2 patients (NPV 100%; CI 0.95-1). ROC analysis for T3a prediction with LCC (AUC 0.81) showed a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 62% at a threshold of 12.5 mm (J = 0.485) and 93% and 58% at 11 mm (Jmax = 0.512). All patients with pT3a had a LCC > 5 mm. In case of pT3b, 29/31 patients showed a SVC (PPV 76%, CI 0.61-0.87; NPV 98%, CI 0.93-0.99), and 23/31 patients showed a SVI (PPV 100%, CI 0.86-1; NPV 93%, CI 0.87-0.96). EPE (p < 0.01), LCC (p = 0.05), and SVC (p = 0.01) were independent predictors of pT3.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-measurable EPE, LCC, and SVC were reliable, independent, preoperative predictors for a histopathological T3 stage. A LCC ≥ 11 mm indicated a pT3a stage, whereas a LCC < 5 mm excluded it. On MRI, visible SVI or even SVC of the PCa lesion was reliable preoperative predictors for a pT3b stage.

Multiparametric MRI - local staging of prostate cancer and beyond

Background Accurate local staging is critical for treatment planning and prognosis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The primary aim is to differentiate between organ-confined and locally advanced disease with the latter carrying a worse clinical prognosis. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the local staging of PCa and has an incremental value in assessing pelvic nodal disease and bone involvement. It has shown superior performance compared to traditional staging based on clinical nomograms, and provides additional information on the site and extent of disease. MRI has a high specificity for diagnosing extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node (LN) metastases, however, sensitivity remains poor. As a result, extended pelvic LN dissection remains the gold standard for assessing pelvic nodal involvement, and there has been recent progress in developing advanced imaging techniques for more distal staging. Conclusions T2W-weighted imaging is the cornerstone for local staging of PCa. Imaging at 3T and incorporating both diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging can further increase accuracy. "Next generation" imaging including whole body MRI and PET-MRI imaging using prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA), has shown promising for assessment of LN and bone involvement as compared to the traditional work-up using bone scintigraphy and body CT.

[PI-RADS 2.0 for Prostate MRI]

The PI-RADS 2.0 classification was established by an international collaboration of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and AdMetech Foundation to globally standardize the acquisition and interpretation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The PI-RADS 2.0 aims to improve the detection, localization, staging and risk stratification of patients with suspected or histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Suspicious areas on T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were assessed for the presence of a clinically significant prostate cancer with scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being most likely to represent clinically significant prostate cancer. The dominant sequence to detect significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone is DWI and for the transition zone T2w images. For the local staging of prostate cancer criteria for the assessment of an extracapsular growth were formulated.

[Imaging of locally advanced prostate cancer : Importance of ultrasound and especially MRI]

Prostate cancer is the most common male malignant tumor in Germany, which thus places growing demands on differentiated imaging and risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate enables reliable detection of clinically significant cancers and is currently the leading imaging modality for the detection, characterization, and local staging of prostate cancer. According to the German S3 guideline, mpMRI of the prostate is currently primarily recommended in patients with previous negative TRUS biopsies and persisting tumor suspicion. The serial use of mpMRI in the pretherapeutic setting can support individual therapy planning of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer in the near future.

Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with PET/MRI

In the ongoing effort to understand and cure prostate cancer, imaging modalities are constantly evolving to assist in clinical decisions. Multiparametric MRI can be used to direct prostate biopsies, improve diagnostic yield, and help clinicians make more accurate decisions. PET is superior in providing biologic information about the cancer and is sensitive and highly specific. Integrated PET/MRI is a welcome technical advance with great potential to influence the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer in clinical practice.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline

INTRODUCTION

The utility of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of prostate cancer is controversial. Due to the success of multiparametric MRI in cancer localization, there is renewed interested in MRI (± functional sequences) for local staging. Guidance on pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer by MRI was developed using systematic review methodology and expert consultation.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched to identify studies comparing: (1) MRI staging vs. radical prostatectomy staging on diagnostic accuracy outcomes; and (2) MRI staging vs. routine clinical staging on clinical and patient outcomes. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were synthesized by outcome and sensitivity/specificity analysis by tumour location was performed. Evidence quality of included studies was assessed and considered in recommendation formulation.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 2510 citations; 62 studies were included. Analysis of MRI ≥1.5 T plus endorectal coil (ER) (± functional sequences) in the detection of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion showed modest sensitivities (≥50%) and excellent specificities (>85%) among patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy. MRI upstaging was shown in 20/21 studies, with large variation in correctness (11-85%). Scarcity of clinical and patient outcomes among studies limited synthesis and evaluation. Quality assessment found non-trivial biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest imaging performance was shown for MRI (1.5 T + ER and 3 T ± ER) ± functional sequences in regards to sensitivity. Limitations in study design, reporting of clinical and patient outcomes, and the heterogeneous use of MRI tempered the strength of the recommendations.

The association between seminal vesicle size and duration of abstinence from ejaculation

There are few data describing the relationship between seminal vesicle (SV) size and duration of abstinence between ejaculations. This study evaluates the association between SV size and duration of abstinence from ejaculation using pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sexually active men 18-68 years old who underwent pelvic MRI for various medical indications were included. The date of last ejaculation was recorded, and the cross-sectional areas of the right and left seminal vesicles were calculated separately using mediolateral and anteroposterior measurements on T2-weighted MRI images. The association between SV area and duration of abstinence between ejaculations was determined via linear regression analysis. The study cohort consisted of 104 men with a mean age of 46.45 ± 11.4 (range 18-68) years old. Mean right and left SV cross-sectional areas were 744.1 ± 351.1 (range: 149.9-1794.7) mm² and 727.6 ± 359.2 (range 171.4-2248.4) mm² respectively. The mean duration of abstinence between ejaculations in the cohort was 3.6 ± 2.6 (range 1-15) days. Although no correlation between age and SV area was observed (r = .007, p = .947), linear regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between SV area and the duration of abstinence from ejaculation (r = .372, p = .0001). SV cross-sectional area increases with duration of abstinence from ejaculation and can be assessed using MRI. The use of SV size estimation may be applicable in diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of urological diseases.

Advancement of MR and PET/MR in Prostate Cancer

Multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) imaging has assumed a larger role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. The current method of detecting prostate cancer relies on blind systematic biopsy, guided only by transrectal ultrasound that generally directs the needle biopsy to sextants of the prostate rather than specific lesions. MpMRI is playing an increasing role in the detection of primary cancer as it can visualize cancers and direct biopsies. However, even mpMRI is inherently nonspecific and numerous biopsies performed under MR guidance prove to be negative. Positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to improve the sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer in combination with mpMRI. Prostate-specific membrane antigen is a widely expressed tumor antigen in prostate cancer for which multiple PET ligands, labeled with ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F, are being developed. However, the low spatial resolution of PET mandates that it be combined with a higher resolution imaging modality, which typically has been computed tomography (CT). However, MRI is not only better at localizing lesions in the prostate and prostatic bed, but it is also more sensitive than CT for early bone marrow changes in bone metastases caused by prostate cancer. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based PET agents show promise in the early detection of recurrent and metastatic disease. Recent developments in hybrid imaging now allow PET/MRI to be performed simultaneously on a single scanner allowing one-to-one correspondence between the PET activity and MRI findings. This offers the opportunity for both high sensitivity and specificity with excellent anatomic location and could allow for more targeted biopsies and treatments. Here, we review the current status of PET/MRI for prostate cancer.

Staging of prostatic carcinoma at 1.5-T MRI: correlation of a simplified MRI exam with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of simplified multiparametric MRI at 1.5 T for local staging by using whole-mount-section histopathological analysis as the standard of reference.

METHODS

123 consecutive patients underwent T2 weighted, T1 weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI without endorectal coil prior to radical prostatectomy. The accuracy of predicting extracapsular extension (ECE) (T3a) was assessed using direct signs or the combination of direct and indirect signs of extraprostatic extension. The accuracy of predicting seminal vesicle invasion (T3b) was evaluated, taking into account different routes of seminal vesicle involvement. Finally, adjacent organ invasion (T4) was evaluated in this patient population.

RESULTS

Histopathology showed T3a, T3b and T4 in 61, 28 and 9 cases, respectively. The use of direct signs of extraprostatic extension showed a sensitivity of 57.4% and specificity of 91.9%. The combination of direct signs and indirect signs improved sensitivity (85.2%) at the expense of moderate loss of specificity (83.9%). MR sensitivity for the detection of seminal vesicle invasion was low (53.6%); however, it was dependent on the route of seminal vesicle tumour infiltration. MR sensitivity and specificity for adjacent organ invasion were 88.9% and 99.1%.

CONCLUSION

Simplified MRI study at 1.5 T provides a relatively high sensitivity for detecting ECE (T3a) when using the combination of indirect and direct signs. However, this high sensitivity reading is at the cost of a moderate loss of specificity. Invasion of the seminal vesicles (T3b) occurs most often along the ejaculatory duct complex with low MR sensitivity.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Simplified MRI study at 1.5 T without endorectal coil could be used for the local T staging of prostate cancer.

PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know

Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer in men worldwide and its incidence is expected to double by 2030. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) incorporating anatomical and functional imaging has now been validated as a means of detecting and characterising prostate tumours and can aid in risk stratification and treatment selection. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) in 2012 established the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines aimed at standardising the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of prostate MRI. Subsequent experience and technical developments have highlighted some limitations, and a joint steering committee formed by the American College of Radiology, ESUR, and the AdMeTech Foundation have recently announced an updated version of the proposals. We summarise the main proposals of PI-RADS version 2, explore the evidence behind the recommendations, and highlight key differences for the benefit of those already familiar with the original.

Multiparametric MRI for localized prostate cancer: lesion detection and staging

Multiparametric MRI of the prostate combines high-resolution anatomic imaging with functional imaging of alterations in normal tissue caused by neoplastic transformation for the identification and characterization of in situ prostate cancer. Lesion detection relies on a systematic approach to the analysis of both anatomic and functional imaging using established criteria for the delineation of suspicious areas. Staging includes visual and functional analysis of the prostate "capsule" to determine if in situ disease is, in fact, organ-confined, as well as the evaluation of pelvic structures including lymph nodes and bones for the detection of metastasis. Although intertwined, the protocol can be optimized depending on whether lesion detection or staging is of the highest priority.