Hypocalcemia post denosumab in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4-5

The effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone health in chronic kidney disease

Fracture is an under-recognized but common complication of diabetes mellitus, with an incidence approaching twofold in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and up to sevenfold in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) compared with that in the general population. Both T1DM and T2DM induce chronic hyperglycaemia, leading to the accumulation of advanced glycosylation end products that affect osteoblast function, increased collagen crosslinking and a senescence phenotype promoting inflammation. Together with an increased incidence of microvascular disease and an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, these factors reduce bone quality, thereby increasing bone fragility. In T1DM, reduced anabolic stimuli as well as the presence of autoimmune conditions might also contribute to reduced bone mass and increased fragility. Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of kidney failure, and fracture risk is exacerbated when chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related mineral and bone disorders are superimposed on diabetic changes. Microvascular pathology, cortical thinning and trabecular deterioration are particularly prominent in patients with T1DM and CKD, who suffer more fragility fractures than do other patients with CKD. This Review explores the pathophysiology of bone fragility in patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD and discusses techniques to predict fracture and pharmacotherapy that might reduce fracture risk.

Denosumab for osteoporosis treatment: when, how, for whom, and for how long. A pragmatical approach

Denosumab produces a continuous increase in bone mineral density over ten years, associated with a low risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Denosumab is well tolerated and easy to manage in daily clinical practice. For all these reasons, this treatment has a huge success. On the other hand, discontinuation of treatment is associated with a severe rebound effect including a sharp increase in bone turnover markers, loss of the bone density gained and a risk of nearly 20% of multiple vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. High doses of potent bisphosphonates are needed to maintain bone turnover markers in the low range of premenopausal women, to mitigate this rebound effect. Prolonged treatment with denosumab is associated with a greater rebound effect and increases the risk of an early rebound effect. The occurrence of rare side effects such as osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fracture, as well as the onset of severe renal failure, leave clinicians at a therapeutic impasse. Continuing denosumab or switching to bisphosphonates remains suboptimal and, currently, no evidence clarifies the optimal treatment approach for these patients. The aim of this review is to give a very practical clinical approach to the use of denosumab (duration of treatment), and to the management of rebound effect and possible adverse effects.

Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with chronic kidney disease: a nested case-control study

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a severe disease leading to decreased quality of life, but risk factors for ONJ in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remain unclear. We conducted a nested case-control study using a large Japanese administrative database to investigate. CKD patients were identified based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements, and ONJ cases were identified using ICD-10 codes and diagnostic terms. Controls were matched 1:4 by age and sex. Among 597 026 CKD patients, 75 ONJ cases were identified during a median follow-up of 2.9 yr (incidence rate: 3.27 per 100 000 patient-years). A total of 375 patients (250 males, 66.7%) with a median age of 72 yr (interquartile range (IQR), 64-78) were included after matching controls. The use of bisphosphonates and denosumab for tumor-related disorders in the case group was significantly higher compared to the control group. There was no significant association between kidney functions and the ONJ risk. Multivariate analysis revealed that anti-resorptive drugs for tumor-related disorders [odds ratio (OR): 74.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.81-634.39, p<.001] and oral corticosteroids (OR: 13.23, 95% CI: 3.34-52.33, p<.001) were significantly associated with increased ONJ risk, while anti-resorptive drugs for osteoporosis and injectable corticosteroid use were not. Other relevant factors such as diabetes, liver disease, anabolic drugs, and radiation therapy did not have a significant association with ONJ risk. When stratified by indications for bisphosphonate use (known to be eliminated by renal excretion), bisphosphonate use for tumor-related disorders showed a significant association with ONJ risk (OR: 27.80, 95% CI: 2.47-313.29, p<.01), while bisphosphonates use for osteoporosis did not (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.19-2.92, p=.67). These findings suggest that anti-resorptive drugs for tumor-related disorders and oral corticosteroids are associated with ONJ risk in CKD patients. Heightened surveillance may be necessary for CKD patients receiving these treatments to prevent or detect ONJ early.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab: Insights beyond 10 Years of Use

Osteoporosis management in post-menopausal women focuses on fracture prevention, with denosumab as a key therapeutic option. Despite its proven efficacy in reducing fracture risk and increasing bone mineral density (BMD) over 10 years, its long-term impact remains uncertain. We evaluated the literature on its efficacy and safety beyond the initial decade. Clinical trials and real-world studies confirm denosumab's sustained efficacy, especially in lumbar spine BMD, with hip BMD stabilizing. Concerns about adverse events (AEs) like hypocalcemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw necessitate vigilant monitoring. Risks of atypical femoral fractures and malignancies also require attention, despite unclear links to treatment duration. Clinical guidelines for denosumab beyond 10 years are limited, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring. In certain scenarios, such as advanced chronic kidney disease, prolonged denosumab may be required to balance AE risks with fracture prevention benefits. Denosumab shows potential for long-term efficacy in augmenting BMD; however, monitoring for AEs is crucial to guide clinical decision-making effectively.

The Effect of Denosumab on Risk for Emergently Treated Hypocalcemia by Stage of Chronic Kidney Disease : A Target Trial Emulation

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on treatment of osteoporosis in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk for emergently treated hypocalcemia with denosumab by stage of CKD and presence of CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD).

DESIGN

Target trial emulation.

SETTING

Medicare fee-for-service data with prescription drug coverage, 2012 to 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Female patients aged 65 years or older initiating denosumab, oral bisphosphonates, or intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

MEASUREMENTS

Hospital and emergency department admissions (that is, emergent care) for hypocalcemia were assessed in the first 12 treatment weeks. Inverse probability of treatment weighted cumulative incidence and weighted risk differences (RDs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 361 453 patients treated with denosumab, 829 044 treated with oral bisphosphonates, and 160 413 treated with IV bisphosphonates were identified. Risk for emergently treated hypocalcemia with denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates increased with worsening CKD stage (P < 0.001), with greatest risk among dialysis-dependent (DD) patients (3.01% vs. 0.00%; RD, 3.01% [95% CI, 2.27% to 3.77%]) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 (0.57% vs. 0.03%; RD, 0.54% [CI, 0.41% to 0.68%]). Among patients with stages 4 and 5 CKD (NDD + DD), denosumab had a greater risk for emergently treated hypocalcemia versus oral bisphosphonates in those with CKD-MBD (1.53% vs. 0.02%; RD, 1.51% [CI, 1.21% to 1.78%]) than in those without CKD-MBD (0.22% vs. 0.03%; RD, 0.19% [CI, 0.08% to 0.31%]). Denosumab also showed increased risk compared with IV bisphosphonates.

LIMITATION

Generalizability to men and non-Medicare populations.

CONCLUSION

Risk for emergently treated hypocalcemia with denosumab increased with worsening CKD stage and was highest in DD patients and those with CKD-MBD.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Current therapeutic approach of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has emerged as one of the leading noncommunicable diseases affecting >10% of the population worldwide. Bone and mineral disorders are a common complication among patients with CKD resulting in a poor life quality, high fracture risk, increased morbidity and cardiovascular mortality. According to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes, renal osteodystrophy refers to changes in bone morphology found in bone biopsy, whereas CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) defines a complex of disturbances including biochemical and hormonal alterations, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism and extraskeletal calcification. As a result, the management of CKD-MBD should focus on the aforementioned parameters, including the treatment of hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, abnormal PTH and vitamin D levels. Regarding the bone fragility fractures, osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy, which constitute the bone component of CKD-MBD, anti-osteoporotic agents constitute the mainstay of treatment. However, a thorough elucidation of the CKD-MBD pathogenesis is crucial for the ideal personalized treatment approach. In this paper, we review the pathology and management of CKD-MBD based on the current literature with special attention to recent advances.

Sustained hypophosphatemia after denosumab in a patient on hemodialysis

An 81-year-old Caucasian man who had commenced thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD) three months earlier, presented with a hip fracture, two vertebral fractures and a bone mineral density T-score of -3.6. He had received weekly iron sucrose infusions for 6 weeks and alphacalcidol on dialysis days. Although he suffered from coeliac disease and cirrhosis, he was fully ambulatory and well-nourished. He was normocalcaemic with a marginally low plasma phosphate and the PTH was 11.8 pmol/L (<2-times the upper range of the assay). In view of his severe osteoporosis, it was decided to treat him with denosumab (dmab). Laboratory assessment 2 weeks post dmab showed severe hypophosphatemia and hypocalcemia; phosphate 0.11 mmol/L and ionized calcium 0.83 mmol/L, and he was admitted for intravenous phosphate infusion. Three months later he remained on a phosphate supplement. The case illustrates that, in addition to the risks of hypocalcemia in patients with kidney failure and high bone turnover, kidney failure patients without evidence of high bone turnover, can also be at risk of hypocalcemia and severe hypophosphatemia requiring acute hospitalization and phosphate infusion. The potential role of compromised phosphate absorption versus increased deposition will be discussed. We recommend a cautious approach to dmab therapy in patients on dialysis, with evaluation of bone turnover and serum phosphate levels prior to initiation of treatment.

Severe Hypocalcemia With Denosumab Among Older Female Dialysis-Dependent Patients

Importance

Dialysis-dependent patients experience high rates of morbidity from fractures, yet little evidence is available on optimal treatment strategies. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is nearly universal in dialysis-dependent patients, complicating diagnosis and treatment of skeletal fragility.

Objective

To examine the incidence and comparative risk of severe hypocalcemia with denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates among dialysis-dependent patients treated for osteoporosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective cohort study of female dialysis-dependent Medicare patients aged 65 years or older who initiated treatment with denosumab or oral bisphosphonates from 2013 to 2020. Clinical performance measures including monthly serum calcium were obtained through linkage to the Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-Enabled Network database.

Exposures

Denosumab, 60 mg, or oral bisphosphonates.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Severe hypocalcemia was defined as total albumin-corrected serum calcium below 7.5 mg/dL (1.88 mmol/L) or a primary hospital or emergency department hypocalcemia diagnosis (emergent care). Very severe hypocalcemia (serum calcium below 6.5 mg/dL [1.63 mmol/L] or emergent care) was also assessed. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted cumulative incidence, weighted risk differences, and weighted risk ratios were calculated during the first 12 treatment weeks.

Results

In the unweighted cohorts, 607 of 1523 denosumab-treated patients and 23 of 1281 oral bisphosphonate-treated patients developed severe hypocalcemia. The 12-week weighted cumulative incidence of severe hypocalcemia was 41.1% with denosumab vs 2.0% with oral bisphosphonates (weighted risk difference, 39.1% [95% CI, 36.3%-41.9%]; weighted risk ratio, 20.7 [95% CI, 13.2-41.2]). The 12-week weighted cumulative incidence of very severe hypocalcemia was also increased with denosumab (10.9%) vs oral bisphosphonates (0.4%) (weighted risk difference, 10.5% [95% CI, 8.8%-12.0%]; weighted risk ratio, 26.4 [95% CI, 9.7-449.5]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Denosumab was associated with a markedly higher incidence of severe and very severe hypocalcemia in female dialysis-dependent patients aged 65 years or older compared with oral bisphosphonates. Given the complexity of diagnosing the underlying bone pathophysiology in dialysis-dependent patients, the high risk posed by denosumab in this population, and the complex strategies required to monitor and treat severe hypocalcemia, denosumab should be administered after careful patient selection and with plans for frequent monitoring.

Efficacy and safety of denosumab treatment for Korean patients with Stage 3b-4 chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of denosumab treatment in severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with osteoporosis. We also investigated whether the treatment affects the coronary artery calcifications.

METHODS

Twenty-seven postmenopausal women with Stage 3b-4 CKD and osteoporosis were enrolled. Twenty patients received denosumab plus calcium carbonate and vitamin D, and seven controls received calcium carbonate and vitamin D for 1 year. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring computed tomography were performed before and after treatment. Hypocalcemic symptoms and serum calcium levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

After 1 year of treatment, the percent changes of femur neck (3.6 ± 3.2% vs. -0.7 ± 4.4%, p = 0.033) and total hip (3.4 ± 3.8% vs. -1.9 ± 2.1%, p = 0.001) bone mineral density (BMD) were significantly increased in the denosumab treated group compared to the control group. However, the percent change of lumbar spine BMD did not differ between two groups (5.6 ± 5.9% vs. 2.7 ± 3.9%, p = 0.273). The percent change of bone alkaline phosphatase was significantly different in the denosumab-treated group and control group (-31.1 ± 30.0% vs. 0.5 ± 32.0%, p = 0.027). CAC scores did not differ between groups. No hypocalcemic events occurred in both groups.

CONCLUSION

If carefully monitored and supplemented with calcium and vitamin D, denosumab treatment for 1 year provides significant benefits in patients with Stage 3b-4 CKD and osteoporosis. However, denosumab treatment did not affect coronary artery calcifications in these patients.

A Rare Reason for Severe Hypocalcemia Following Kidney Transplant: Denosumab Treatment

Deviations of calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and vitamin D levels are the basis for the diagnosis of calcium-phosphate metabolism disorders. The plasma concentration of the biologically active form known as free calcium is regulated in a harmonious manner by its exchange in the bones and reabsorption by the kidneys. These steps take place under the control of parathyroid hormone and calcitriol. In the process of chronic kidney disease, the kidney cannot synthesize adequate calcitriol, and the resulting hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia cause the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease and is essentially the consequence of osteoclastogenesis-induced bone resorption that exceeds bone formation. Osteoporosis is common after kidney transplant. However, hypocalcemia following kidney transplant is rare. The hungry bone syndrome after parathyroidectomy is often responsible for this condition in the pretransplant period. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody developed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (known as RANKL). Denosumab exerts an antiresorptive effect on bones by reducing differentiation into osteoclasts. It is an effective treatment option for osteoporosis in the general population. There is insufficient scientific data regarding the use of denosumab in kidney transplant patients. Here, we present the case of a kidney transplant recipient who developed severe hypocalcemia (serum calcium 4.7 mg/dL) after denosumab treatment for osteoporosis.

Reducing the risk of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a quality improvement initiative

Denosumab can improve bone health in advanced kidney disease (CKD) but is associated with hypocalcemia. We created a clinical care pathway focused on the safe provision of denosumab in advanced CKD that reduced the risk of hypocalcemia by 37% at our hospital. Similar pathways could be adopted and tested in other centers.

PURPOSE

There is an increased risk of hypocalcemia with denosumab in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to reduce the proportion of patients with advanced CKD who experienced denosumab-induced hypocalcemia at our center.

METHODS

We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project of patients with CKD stage 3b or less (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73m2 including dialysis) who were part of the Osteoporosis and Bone Disease Program at St. Joseph's Health Care London (Canada) between December 2020 and January 2023. Our intervention was a clinical care pathway which optimized CKD mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and 25-hydroxyvitamin levels; provided calcium and vitamin D prophylaxis; promoted multidisciplinary communication between bone and kidney specialists; and carefully monitored calcium post-denosumab injection. Our primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with hypocalcemia (defined by albumin-corrected serum calcium <1.9mmol/L) at 60 days. Process measures included the appropriate provision of calcium and vitamin D prophylaxis. Balance measures included the development of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia following prophylaxis. We used plan-do-see-act cycles to study four tests of change and presented results using descriptive statistics and run charts.

RESULTS

There were 6 patients with advanced CKD treated with denosumab prior to the implementation of our care pathway (March 2015-October 2020; 83% receiving dialysis). At the time of their denosumab injection, 83% were using 500-1000 mg of calcium, and 83% used 1000-2000 IU of vitamin D3. Fifty percent developed denosumab-induced hypocalcemia. Following the implementation of our care pathway, 15 patients (40% receiving dialysis) were treated with denosumab. Ninety-three percent received calcium at a daily dose of 350 to 2250 mg and 87% received 1000-2000 IU of vitamin D3. Thirteen percent developed denosumab-induced hypocalcemia. There was no hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical care pathway focused on the safe provision of denosumab in advanced CKD reduced the risk of hypocalcemia in patients treated in our hospital. Similar pathways could be adopted and tested in other centers.

Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The effects of denosumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and metabolism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remain controversial. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in June 2022 to identify studies that evaluated the risk of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia and changes in bone metabolism, changes in BMD from baseline to post-treatment in patients with ESRD.

FINDINGS

Twelve studies with 348 participants were included. The pooled incidence of hypocalcemia during denosumab treatment was 35.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-46%; I2  = 63.6%). There were no significant changes in either the serum calcium or phosphate levels from the baseline to post-treatment period; the mean differences were 0.04 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.12 to 0.20 mg/dL) and -0.39 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.89 to 0.12 mg/dL). We found significant changes in the alkaline phosphatase and parathyroid hormone levels; the standardized mean differences were -2.98 (95% CI, -5.36 to -0.59) and -3.12 (95% CI: -4.94 to -1.29), respectively. Denosumab may increase BMD, with mean differences of 9.10% (95% CI: 4.07%-14.13%) and 9.00% (95% CI: 5.93%-12.07%) for the femoral neck and lumbar spine, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Denosumab increased the BMDs of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with ESRD. The onset of hypocalcemia must be carefully monitored during denosumab administration.

Chapter 2:indications and dosing of anticancer drug therapy in patients with impaired kidney function, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

This comprehensive review discusses the dosing strategies of cancer treatment drugs for patients with impaired kidney function, specifically those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), undergoing hemodialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. CKD patients often necessitate dose adjustments of chemotherapeutic agents, e.g., platinum preparations, pyrimidine fluoride antimetabolites, antifolate agents, molecularly targeted agents, and bone-modifying agents, to prevent drug accumulation and toxicity due to diminished renal clearance of the administered drugs and their metabolites. In hemodialysis patients, factors such as drug removal from hemodialysis and altered pharmacokinetics demand careful optimization of anticancer drug therapy, including dose adjustment and timing of administration. While free cisplatin is removed by hemodialysis, most of the tissue- and protein-bound cisplatin remains in the body and rebound cisplatin elevations are observed after hemodialysis. It is not recommended hemodialysis for drug removal, regardless of timing. Kidney transplant patients encounter unique challenges in cancer treatment, as maintaining the balance between reduction of immunosuppression, switching to mTOR inhibitors, and considering potential drug interactions with chemotherapeutic agents and immunosuppressants are crucial for preventing graft rejection and achieving optimal oncologic outcomes. The review underscores the importance of personalized, patient-centric approaches to anticancer drug therapy in patients with impaired kidney function.

Treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in adults

Hypercalcaemia of malignancy (HCM) is a common metabolic complication of advanced malignancies with a prevalence varying from 2-30%, depending on cancer type and disease stage. HCM is associated with impaired quality of life, increased risk of hospitalisation and limited survival. Evidence-based guidelines for management of HCM have been lacking to date, despite its prevalence and detrimental impact. This concise guidance highlights key recommendations from the recent Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Treatment of Hypercalcaemia of Malignancy in Adults, published in December 2022. A systematic review and meta-analysis was commissioned to support the guideline development process. Key suggestions include the use of denosumab in preference to intravenous bisphosphonates as first-line treatment for HCM and the use of denosumab in cases of recurrent or refractory HCM in patients previously treated with intravenous bisphosphonates. The guideline also identifies priority areas for future research.

Interaction between ferric carboxymaltose and denosumab causing severe hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia in a patient without chronic kidney disease

Coadministration of ferric carboxymaltose and denosumab may cause hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia; however, this interaction is not well-described in the literature and has typically been described in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We present a case of this interaction in a patient without preexisting CKD. We suggest the use of alternative iron preparations and an interval of at least 4 weeks between administrations.

Denosumab for osteoporosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT)-related osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Women over 50 years of age with PHPT or postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) were retrospectively recruited into this longitudinal study. These PHPT and PMO groups were further categorized into subgroups based on the presence of CKD (Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²). All patients were given denosumab over 24 months due to verified osteoporosis. The primary outcomes were changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and serum calcium levels.

RESULTS

145 postmenopausal women median age 69 [63;77] were recruited and assigned to one of the subgroups: PHPT patients with CKD (n = 22), PHPT patients without CKD (n = 38), PMO patients with CKD (n = 17) and PMO patients without CKD (n = 68). Denosumab treatment significantly increased BMD in patients with PHPT-related osteoporosis and CKD: median T-score L1-L4 from -2.0 to -1.35 (p < 0.001), femur neck from -2.4 to -2.1 (p = 0.012), radius 33% from -3.2 to -3 (p < 0.05)) at 24 months. Changes in BMD were similar in all four studied groups compared to baseline. A marked decline in calcium was noted in the primary study group of PHPT with CKD (median ΔCa = -0.24 mmol/L p < 0.001), compared to PHPT without CKD (median ΔCa = -0.08 mmol/L p < 0.001) and PMO with or without CKD. Denosumab treatment was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab treatment was similarly effective at increasing BMD in patients with PHPT and PMO with and without renal insufficiency. The calcium lowering effects of denosumab were most significant in patients with PHPT and CKD. The safety of denosumab did not differ among participants with and without CKD.

Adverse Effects of Denosumab in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 20-Year Retrospective Single-Center Observation Study in Central Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Bone loss can be noted in kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs) and can be related to fracture events. Denosumab, a potent monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand, increases lumbar bone mineral density. However, safety data for denosumab remain limited regarding transplant recipients. Hypocalcemia and increased genital tract infections have been mentioned as adverse effects in KTRs after being prescribed denosumab.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of KTRs during the recent 20 years who had been prescribed antiresorptive therapy and were >18 years old. Medical records and their clinical data were reviewed and analyzed. We compared the frequency of adverse effects between denosumab with other antiresorptive therapies.

RESULTS

A total of 70 KTRs were enrolled, with 46 patients being given denosumab and the first injection being noted on October 31, 2014. No significant differences were seen in mortality rate, opportunistic infection, pneumonia, or genitourinary tract infection. One diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaw was noted in the denosumab group (2.2%). A higher incidence of hypocalcemia (<8.4 mg/dL) was noted in the denosumab group (34.8%), and a higher but nonsignificant difference in the incidence of severe hypocalcemia was also noted in the group.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab may be considered as safe as other antiresorptive therapies for KTRs. However, more hypocalcemia events have been noted, so medical personnel may need to be cautious when prescribing its use.

Hypocalcemia Risk of Denosumab Across the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Denosumab can be used in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) but has been linked with cases of severe hypocalcemia. The incidence of and risk factors for hypocalcemia after denosumab use are not well established. Using linked health care databases at ICES, we conducted a population-based cohort study of adults >65 years old with a new prescription for denosumab or a bisphosphonate between 2012 and 2020. We assessed incidence of hypocalcemia within 180 days of drug dispensing and stratified results by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m² ). We used Cox proportional hazards to assess risk factors for hypocalcemia. There were 59,151 and 56,847 new denosumab and oral bisphosphonate users, respectively. Of the denosumab users, 29% had serum calcium measured in the year before their prescription, and one-third had their serum calcium checked within 180 days after their prescription. Mild hypocalcemia (albumin corrected calcium <2.00 mmol/L) occurred in 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 0.7) of new denosumab users and severe hypocalcemia (<1.8 mmol/L) in 0.2% (95% CI 0.2, 0.3). In those with an eGFR <15 or receiving maintenance dialysis, the incidence of mild and severe hypocalcemia was 24.1% (95% CI 18.1, 30.7) and 14.9% (95% CI 10.1, 20.7), respectively. In this group, kidney function and baseline serum calcium were strong predictors of hypocalcemia. We did not have information on over-the-counter vitamin D or calcium supplementation. In new bisphosphonate users, the incidence of mild hypocalcemia was 0.3% (95% CI 0.3, 0.3) with an incidence of 4.7% (95% CI 1.5, 10.8) in those with an eGFR <15 or receiving maintenance dialysis. In this large population-based cohort, we found that the overall risk of hypocalcemia with new denosumab use was low but increased substantially in those with eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m² . Future studies should investigate strategies to mitigate hypocalcemia. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Integrated Osteoporosis Care to Reduce Denosumab-Associated Hypocalcemia for Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease

The incidence of hypocalcemia is high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing denosumab treatment. Since 2018, we have carried out a "multidisciplinary integrated care program for osteoporosis among patients with CKD and ESRD" in our hospital. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia among patients with advanced CKD and ESRD before and after the integrated care program. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients on their first dose of denosumab treatment from January 2012 to December 2021. A total of 3208 patients were included in our study. Among the 3208 patients, there were 101 dialysis patients, 150 patients with advanced CKD (stage 4 and 5), and 2957 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) higher than or equal to 30. The incidence of post-treatment severe hypocalcemia (corrected calcium level less than 7.0 mg/dl) within 30 days was significantly higher in the dialysis and advanced CKD group than in patients with an eGFR higher than or equal to 30 (6.9% vs. 2.0% vs. 0.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). Based on the results of the multivariate regression model, poor renal function (p < 0.05) and lower baseline corrected calcium level (p < 0.05) were associated with severe hypocalcemia within 30 days following the first dose of denosumab treatment. The incidence of post-treatment severe hypocalcemia within 30 days in advanced CKD and dialysis patients was significantly lower after the integrated care program (6.8% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.05). Our study shows that multidisciplinary integrated care may reduce the incidence rate of denosumab-associated severe hypocalcemia among patients with advanced CKD and ESRD.

A bibliometric research based on hotspots and frontier trends of denosumab

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits the osteoclast activating factor receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL). It has been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis, giant cell tumors of bone, and in the prevention of malignant skeletal-related events (SREs). We collected the research results and related MeSH terms of denosumab from 2011 to 2021 through the Web of Science and PubMed, respectively. The literature was visualized and analyzed by CiteSpace and bibliometric online analysis platforms. The MeSH terms were biclustered using the Bibliographic Co-Occurrence Analysis System (BICOMB) and graph clustering toolkit (gCLUTO). The results show that the number of denosumab-related annual publications had increased from 51 to 215, with the United States leading and Amgen Inc. being the most influential in the past 10 years. Articles published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research had the highest total citations. Three scholars from Shinshu University in Matsumoto, Yukio Nakamura, Takako Suzuki, and Hiroyuki Kato, joined the field relatively late but produced the most. The clinical comparison and combination of denosumab with other drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis was the most significant focus of research. Drug withdrawal rebound and management strategies have gained more attention and controversy recently. MeSH analysis revealed eight major categories of research hotspots. Among them, exploring the multiple roles of the RANK-RANKL-OPG system in tumor progression, metastasis, and other diseases is the potential direction of future mechanism research. It is a valuable surgical topic to optimize the perioperative drug administration strategy for internal spinal fixation and orthopedic prosthesis implantation. Taken together, the advantages of denosumab were broad and cost-effective. However, there were still problems such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, severe hypocalcemia, a high recurrence rate of giant cells in the treatment of bone and individual sarcoidosis, and atypical femoral fractures, which need to be adequately solved.

Seizures Associated With Bone Density Conservation Agents

Objective

The purpose of this review is to discuss the existing literature regarding patients who have experienced seizures after administration of a bone density conservation agent (BDCA).

Data Sources

A comprehensive literature review was performed between September and October 2021 using the following keywords: osteoporosis/drug therapy, seizures/chemically induced, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, osteoporosis, seizure risk, osteoclast medication, seizures, bisphosphonates, risedronate, zoledronic acid, pamidronate, denosumab, Prolia, Xgeva, calcitonin, BDCAs.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

A total of 90 articles were identified, but only 6 articles met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. These articles included 4 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 retrospective cohort study.

Data Synthesis

Two case reports and 1 case series described the occurrence of seizures with the use of zoledronic acid. One case report described the occurrence of seizures with the use of alendronate, 1 retrospective cohort study with the use of denosumab, and 1 case report with the use of calcitonin. The articles displayed a variety of contributing factors that could have caused seizures including those with a prior history of seizures, calcium or vitamin D deficiency prior to starting therapy, a history of gastrectomy impairing glucose homeostasis, or concurrent infection.

Conclusion

While there is not a direct link to BDCA causing seizures, the hypocalcemic effect may be severe enough in some patients to precipitate a seizure. The correction of underlying conditions and electrolyte disturbances should be addressed before initiating a BDCA. Further studies are needed to better explore the relationship between BDCA and seizures.

Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in a patient with hyperthyroidism: a case report

Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL). Denosumab is an effective treatment for osteoporosis but can cause hypocalcemia. We present a case of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in a patient with hyperthyroidism with a high bone turnover state. A 48-year-old postmenopausal woman was diagnosed with hyperthyroidism and osteoporosis and received antithyroid drugs (propylthiouracil 200 mg/day) and denosumab. After 2 months of taking medication, the patient complained of numbness and tingling in the hands and feet and was diagnosed with hypocalcemia (calcium, 5.8 mg/dL; ionized calcium, 0.83 mmol/L). Alfacalcidol (0.5 μg/day) and calcium carbonate (3000 mg/day) were prescribed. Subsequently, the patient's symptoms improved, and her serum calcium level normalized. The risk of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia may be increased in patients with diseases related to high bone turnover, such as hyperthyroidism; therefore, caution is needed.

Case report: Denosumab-associated acute heart failure in patients with cardiorenal insufficiency

Denosumab is a pivotal treatment for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Although its clinical use is generally well tolerated by patients, denosumab in patients with renal insufficiency may increase the risk of hypocalcemia. Thus, we have to consider the population of denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis and preventive measures for related complications. In a patient with cardiorenal insufficiency, we reported a case of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia complicated by acute left heart failure due to delayed administration of active vitamin D and calcium supplements. The patient's symptoms did not improve after anti-heart failure treatment. However, after adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation subsequently, the patient's symptoms of heart failure were rapidly relieved, and the serum calcium level returned to normal within three weeks. Therefore, our case showed that the application of denosumab in patients requires assessment of cardiac and renal function, timely calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and enhanced monitoring of serum calcium levels to prevent acute left heart failure induced by denosumab-related hypocalcemia.

Optimization of osteoporosis and osteopenia management among renal transplant recipients

Background

Osteoporosis and osteopenia occur frequently in renal transplant recipients due to long-term use of immune-suppressants including corticosteroids. Previous treatment options like bisphosphonates had acceptable but rather unsatisfactory results after transplant. The aim of the current study is to directly compare the efficacy of denosumab and oral ibandronate in late RTR with low bone mineral density.

Results

The study was conducted Iin Hamed Al-Essa Kidney transplant center, Kuwait, in 2020. The data of 52 denosumab and 48 ibandronate patients were collected at the baseline and after one year of treatment. Spine and hip T-score readings, side effects, and other laboratory results were analyzed to evaluate the use of both medications. The mean number of months after transplant was 25 (± 13.9) months. After one year of treatment, denosumab alleviated both spinal osteoporosis and osteopenia T-score values from −3.13 to −2.4 (p = 0.008) and from −1.9 to −1.5 (p = 0.015), respectively. Besides, it reduced hip osteoporosis and osteopenia insignificantly from −3.45 to −3.1 and from −1.5 to −1.3, respectively (p > 0.05). Ibandronate improved spinal osteopenia from −1.6 to −1.55 (p = 0.97) and failed to show any positive impact on other sites; the spinal osteoporosis changed from −2.8 to −3 and hip osteoporosis and osteopenia changed from −3.1 to −3.12 and from −1.4 to −1.45, respectively (p > 0.05). The use of ibandronate was more associated with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) side effects, while hypocalcemia episodes were significantly higher in the denosumab group.

Conclusion

Denosumab improved both spinal and hip T-score values in comparison with ibandronate in RTR. Close monitoring is required for denosumab patients to prevent the associated hypocalcemia.

Graphical Abstract

Acute Diffuse Renal Tubulopathy in a Patient With Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICPIs), as either a frontline or adjuvant therapy, showed favorable outcomes among diverse malignancies. Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) are increasingly encountered, but the kidneys are rarely affected. A 67-year-old man with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung presented with acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia secondary to bone metastasis. After an aggressive saline infusion and subcutaneous denosumab 60mg administration, his renal function and serum calcium level were recovered on day 4. Due to his intolerance to chemotherapy, immunotherapy with a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), pembrolizumab 2mg/kg, was used on day 4. On day 11, polyuria, non-albumin dominant proteinuria, and severe deficiencies of electrolytes (potassium 2.5 mmol/L, calcium 5.5 mg/dL, magnesium 1.3 mg/dL, and phosphate 1.5 mg/dL) along with concomitant renal wasting were developed acutely. Except for postponing the next pembrolizumab, prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day was given on day 13. On day 27, his polyuria subsided and urine protein loss resolved. Serum levels of potassium, phosphate, calcium, and magnesium all returned within the reference range. This case highlighted that renal IRAEs, even though uncommon, could be severe and potentially life-threatening if left unrecognized and untreated. Early recognition of renal IRAEs and prompt withdrawal of ICPIs may result in lower renal morbidity.

Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia and Hyperparathyroidism in de novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab represents a realistic treatment option to increase bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). It is still unknown how and at what extent posttransplantation bone disease and graft function influence the effects of denosumab on mineral metabolism indexes. In this study, we analyze risk factors of hypocalcemia and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase after denosumab administration in eighteen de novo KTRs and its management before and after this treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric, observational, prospective study on de novo KTRs. All KTRs enrolled received a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab every 6 months. Before kidney transplantation, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic. After kidney transplantation and before antiresorptive therapy, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic drugs and/or vitamin D receptor agonists, while all patients received nutritional vitamin D supplementation (from 1,000 IU to 1,500 IU daily).

RESULTS

Hypocalcemia was related to the degree of lumbar osteoporosis (p = 0.047); the increase in the PTH level was correlated to baseline bone turnover markers (bone alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, and β-C-terminal telopeptide), the 25 OH status, and eGFR. The introduction of calcitriol, after the PTH increase, in addition to cholecalciferol was necessary to ensure an adequate control of serum calcium and PTH during a follow-up of 15 months. Following the treatment with denosumab, it was observed an improvement of areal bone mineral density both at lumbar and femoral sites with a mean percentual increase of 1.74% and 0.25%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab is an effective treatment for bone disease in KTRs. In our study, the increase in PTH is not a transient event but prolonged throughout the follow-up period and requires continuous supplementation therapy with calcitriol.

Importance of bone turnover for therapeutic decisions in patients with CKD-MBD

Patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) frequently have low bone formation rates. A recent review suggested that adynamic bone disease is not always associated with negative outcomes and therefore antiresorptive medications could be used more often. However, there is currently no evidence to support an improvement in fracture risk or mortality in patients with CKD-MBD and low bone turnover who are treated with antiresorptive medication. There is reasonable pathophysiological evidence suggesting that it may even be harmful.

Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Review

Osteoporosis and fractures are common in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and on maintenance dialysis. Although the diagnosis of osteoporosis in this population can be difficult, imaging, especially with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is helpful in identifying persons with CKD at the highest risk of fracture. Although blood biomarkers including parathyroid hormone and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase concentrations can aid in assessing bone turnover state, bone biopsy remains the gold standard in determining bone turnover in persons with advanced kidney disease and osteoporosis. With the increasing armamentarium of osteoporosis drugs, it now may be possible to prevent many fractures in advanced CKD. Unfortunately, data on these drugs are limited in persons with advanced CKD. Clinicians, aided by advances in imaging, biomarkers, and bone biopsy can now use these novel agents to target bone turnover abnormalities such as adynamic bone disease and high bone turnover disease. This review will discuss the most recent literature surrounding the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of osteoporosis and fractures in persons with advanced CKD or on maintenance dialysis.

Denosumab in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review of treatment efficacy and safety

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of bone fractures. In this review, we summarize the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, describe the usefulness of a medication called denosumab, and review its safety in this population. Our article will help doctors manage brittle bones in CKD and encourage researchers to conduct more studies to improve bone health in CKD.

PURPOSE

Patients with CKD are at increased risk of fragility fractures and associated consequences. We discuss the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, summarize the efficacy and safety of denosumab, and provide an approach to denosumab-induced hypocalcemia.

METHODS

Using predefined terms, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar for studies on fracture prevention in CKD and the efficacy and safety of denosumab. We included observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, evidence-based reviews, and clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of osteoporosis and prevention of related fragility fractures is complex in CKD, particularly in those with advanced and end-staged kidney disease (ESKD). Prior to initiating denosumab, it is important to assess for and optimize CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD). In observational studies and small RCTs, denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce bone turnover in CKD, but there have been no studies focused upon its fracture efficacy. Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia has also been reported, which disproportionately impacts those with ESKD. Risk factors for hypocalcemia with denosumab use in CKD include lower baseline serum calcium and 25 hydroxyvitamin D and both low and high bone turnover. Choosing the "right patient" for denosumab, supplementing with calcium and vitamin D, adjusting calcium dialysate, and close clinical monitoring are essential if considering this drug.

CONCLUSION

With optimization of CKD-MBD, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and close monitoring, denosumab can be considered in CKD. There are however opportunities to better understand its fracture efficacy and safety in an RCT setting.

Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis and is more prevalent among people with CKD than among people who do not have CKD. Although several drugs have been used to effectively treat osteoporosis in the general population, it is unclear whether they are also effective and safe for people with CKD, who have altered systemic mineral and bone metabolism.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in patients with CKD stages 3-5, and those undergoing dialysis (5D).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 25 January 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing any anti-osteoporotic drugs with a placebo, no treatment or usual care in patients with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed their quality using the risk of bias tool, and extracted data. The main outcomes were the incidence of fracture at any sites; mean change in the bone mineral density (BMD; measured using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DXA)) of the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, and distal radius; death from all causes; incidence of adverse events; and quality of life (QoL). Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 9164 randomised participants with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D met the inclusion criteria; all participants were postmenopausal women. Five studies included patients with CKD stages 3-4, and two studies included patients with CKD stages 5 or 5D. Five pharmacological interventions were identified (abaloparatide, alendronate, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide). All studies were judged to be at an overall high risk of bias. Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.69; low certainty evidence). Anti-osteoporotic drugs probably makes little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; moderate certainty evidence) and adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence). We were unable to incorporate studies into the meta-analyses for BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip as they only reported the percentage change in the BMD in the intervention group. Among patients with severe CKD stages 5 or 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low (MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.02). Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.04, low certainty evidence). No adverse events were reported in the included studies. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.56; very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in low certainty evidence. Anti-osteoporotic drugs make little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture and adverse events in moderate certainty evidence. Among patients with CKD stages 5 and 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture and death because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine in low certainty evidence. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Larger studies including men, paediatric patients or individuals with unstable CKD-mineral and bone disorder are required to assess the effect of each anti-osteoporotic drug at each stage of CKD.

Differentiating the causes of adynamic bone in advanced chronic kidney disease informs osteoporosis treatment

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased fracture risk because of impaired bone quality and quantity. Low bone mineral density predicts fracture risk in all CKD stages, including advanced CKD (CKD G4-5D). Pharmacological therapy improves bone mineral density and reduces fracture risk in moderate CKD. Its efficacy in advanced CKD remains to be determined, although pilot studies suggest a positive effect on bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive agents are the most commonly prescribed drugs for the prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. Their use in advanced CKD has been limited by the lack of large clinical trials and fear of causing kidney dysfunction and adynamic bone disease. In recent decades, adynamic bone disease has evolved as the most predominant form of renal osteodystrophy, commonly associated with poor outcomes, including premature mortality and progression of vascular calcification. Evolving evidence indicates that reduction of bone turnover by parathyroidectomy or pharmacological therapies, such as calcimimetics and antiresorptive agents, are not associated with premature mortality or accelerated vascular calcification in CKD. In contrast, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, malnutrition, and diabetes can induce low bone turnover and associate with poor prognosis. Thus, the conditions causing suppression of bone turnover rather than the low bone turnover per se may account for the perceived association with outcomes. Anabolic treatment, in contrast, has been suggested to improve turnover and bone mass in patients with advanced CKD and low bone turnover; however, uncertainty about safety even exceeds that of antiresorptive agents. Here, we critically review the pathophysiological concept of adynamic bone disease and discuss the effect of low bone turnover on the safety and efficacy of anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in advanced CKD.

The renal patient seen by non-renal physicians: the kidney embedded in the 'milieu intérieur'

Chronic kidney disease is defined as a decrease in renal function or evidence of kidney injury for >3 months. This represents an oversimplification that may confuse physicians. Thus kidney function is equated to glomerular filtration rate, which represents one of multiple kidney functions. Some potentially more important renal functions are lost earlier, such as the production for the anti-ageing factor Klotho. Overall, these changes modify the emergent properties of the body, altering the relationships between different organs and systems, in a manner that is difficult to predict the response to interventions based on normal physiology concepts, as there is a novel steady state of interorgan relations. In this regard we now discuss the impact of CKD on heart failure; osteomuscular and joint pain and bone fragility and fractures; and osteosarcopaenia as seen by a cardiologist, a rheumatologist and a geriatrician.

Kidney injury and disease in patients with haematological malignancies

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with cancer, especially in those with haematological malignancies. Kidney injury might be a direct consequence of the underlying haematological condition. For example, in the case of lymphoma infiltration or extramedullary haematopoiesis, it might be caused by a tumour product; in the case of cast nephropathy it might be due to the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulin; or it might result from tumour complications, such as hypercalcaemia. Kidney injury might also be caused by cancer treatment, as many chemotherapeutic agents are nephrotoxic. High-intensity treatments, such as high-dose chemotherapy followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, not only increase the risk of infection but can also cause AKI through various mechanisms, including viral nephropathies, engraftment syndrome and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Some conditions, such as thrombotic microangiopathy, might also result directly from the haematological condition or the treatment. Novel immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, can also be nephrotoxic. As new therapies for haematological malignancies with increased anti-tumour efficacy and reduced toxicity are developed, the number of patients receiving these treatments will increase. Clinicians must gain a good understanding of the different mechanisms of kidney injury associated with cancer to better care for these patients.

Osteoporosis and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD): Back to Basics

Osteoporosis is defined as a skeletal disorder of compromised bone strength predisposing those affected to an elevated risk of fracture. However, based on bone histology, osteoporosis is only part of a spectrum of skeletal complications that includes osteomalacia and the various forms of renal osteodystrophy of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). In addition, the label "kidney-induced osteoporosis" has been proposed, even though the changes caused by CKD do not qualify as osteoporosis by the histological diagnosis. It is clear, therefore, that such terminology may not be helpful diagnostically or in making treatment decisions. A new label, "CKD-MBD/osteoporosis" could be a more appropriate term because it brings osteoporosis under the official label of CKD-MBD. Neither laboratory nor noninvasive diagnostic investigations can discriminate osteoporosis from the several forms of renal osteodystrophy. Transiliac crest bone biopsy can make the diagnosis of osteoporosis by exclusion of other kidney-associated bone diseases, but its availability is limited. Recently, a classification of metabolic bone diseases based on bone turnover, from low to high, together with mineralization and bone volume, has been proposed. Therapeutically, no antifracture treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with kidney-associated bone disease. Agents that suppress parathyroid hormone (vitamin D analogues and calcimimetics) are used to treat hyperparathyroid bone disease. Antiresorptive and osteoanabolic agents approved for osteoporosis are being used off-label to treat CKD stages 3b-5 in high-risk patients. It has now been suggested that intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone as early as CKD stage 2 could be an effective management strategy. If confirmed in clinical trials, it could mitigate the retention of phosphorus and subsequently the rise in fibroblast growth factor 23 and may be beneficial for coexisting osteoporosis.

A novel modified RANKL variant can prevent osteoporosis by acting as a vaccine and an inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The discovery of receptor activator of nuclear factor-ĸB ligand (RANKL) as the final effector in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis has led to a better understanding of bone remodeling. When RANKL binds to its receptor (RANK), osteoclastic differentiation and activation are initiated. Herein, we propose a strategy using a novel RANKL variant as a competitive inhibitor for RANKL. The RANKL variant activates LGR4 signaling, which competitively regulates RANK and acts as an immunogen that induces anti-RANKL antibody production.

METHODS

We modified the RANK-binding site on RANKL using minimal amino acid changes in the RANKL complex and its counterpart receptor RANK and tried to evaluate the inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis.

RESULTS

The novel RANKL variant did not bind RANK in osteoclast progenitor cells, but activated LGR4 through the GSK3-β signaling pathway, thereby suppressing activated T cell cytoplasmic nuclear factor calcineurin-dependent 1 (NFATc1) expression and activity during osteoclastogenesis. Our RANKL variant generated high levels of RANKL-specific antibodies, blocked osteoclastogenesis, and inhibited osteoporosis in ovariectomized mouse models. Generated anti-RANKL antibodies showed a high inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis in vivo and in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that the novel RANKL indeed blocks RANKL via LGR4 signaling and generates anti-RANKL antibodies, demonstrating an innovative strategy in the development of general immunotherapy.

Hypocalcemia and bone mineral changes in hemodialysis patients with low bone mass treated with denosumab: a 2-year observational study

BACKGROUND

Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) following a single dose of denosumab and increased incidence of denosumab-associated acute hypocalcemia (DAAH) have been reported in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Little is known about clinical risk factors related to DAAH and the long-term effect of denosumab on BMD in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

An observational non-controlled study involving 47 hemodialysis patients was conducted to determine the independent risk factors related to percent changes in serum Ca levels associated with denosumab using multivariate regression analysis. Optimal predictive markers for DAAH were explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Percent changes of BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) over 24 months were investigated.

RESULTS

The incidence of DAAH (serum corrected Ca (cCa) ≤ 8 mg/dL) following denosumab was 25.5%. Multivariate regression analysis showed baseline bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was independently related to percent changes in cCa levels (β = -0.407, P = 0.008). Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP-5b) was found to be the most accurate marker to predict DAAH with AUC of 0.750 (95% CI; 0.546-0.954, P = 0.02) and the optimal cut-off level was 670 mU/mL with sensitivity; 0.727 and specificity; 0.733. BMD significantly increased by 5.9 ± 1.7% (P = 0.01) at LS and 4.2 ± 1.5% (P = 0.04) at FN at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

In hemodialysis patients, high bone turnover was an independent risk factor for the Ca declines induced by denosumab. Denosumab significantly increased BMD at LS and FN over 24 months.

Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

CONTEXT

The effects of long-term exposure to denosumab in individuals with renal insufficiency are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of denosumab in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stages 2 and 3) using data from the pivotal phase 3, double-blind, 3-year FREEDOM (NCT00089791) and open-label, 7-year extension (NCT00523341) studies.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Women age 60 to 90 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5 to greater than -4.0 at the total hip or lumbar spine were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (long-term arm) or placebo (cross-over arm) in FREEDOM; eligible participants could enroll in the extension to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from study baseline and annualized rates of fracture and adverse events (AEs) were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Most participants (1259/1969 [64%] long-term arm; 1173/1781 [66%] crossover arm) with baseline CKD stage 2 or 3 remained within the same CKD subgroup at study completion; less than 3% progressed to CKD stage 4. Participants in all eGFR subgroups showed similar, persistent BMD gains over time and a low incidence of fractures. The percentage of participants reporting serious AEs was similar among renal subgroups (normal, CKD stage 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b) both for the long-term (54% vs 52% vs 57% vs 58%) and crossover (43% vs 42% vs 43% vs 68%) arms, except CKD stage 3b subgroup, crossover arm.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of denosumab did not differ among participants with mild to moderate CKD.

A Simple-to-Use Score for Identifying Individuals at High Risk of Denosumab-Associated Hypocalcemia in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Real-World Cohort Study

Since denosumab-associated hypocalcemia occurs infrequently, data on its incidence and risk factors are limited. We aimed to evaluate risk factors and develop a useful score for identifying individuals at risk of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia. In this retrospective cohort, 790 consecutive female patients who received 60 mg denosumab at least once between 2016 and 2017 were analyzed. Based on biochemical records from a large-scale single-center, mild and moderate hypocalcemia were defined as albumin-corrected calcium (cCa) levels < 8.5 and < 8.0 mg/dL (< 2.12 and < 2.0 mmol/L), respectively. Mild and moderate hypocalcemia were observed in 8.2% and 1.0% patients, respectively. Patients who developed mild hypocalcemia had lower baseline cCa (8.9 vs. 9.3 mg/dL and 2.22 vs. 2.32mmo/L) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (75.0 vs. 83.2 mL/min/1.73 m²) and more frequent loop diuretic use (10.8% vs. 4.4%; all p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, low baseline cCa (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.20-1.40) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3b-5 were associated with elevated mild hypocalcemia risk (OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.38-6.20). Loop diuretics use was associated with mild hypocalcemia (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.11-6.18) by univariate analysis, independent of baseline cCa and CKD stage. A scoring approach identified two risk groups: (1) patients without CKD (eGFR ≥ 45) and cCa < 8.5 mg/dL (2.12 mmol/L) and (2) patients with CKD (eGFR < 45) and cCa < 9.5 mg/dL (2.37 mmol/L).

Denosumab-associated hypocalcemia: Does gender play a role?

OBJECTIVE

It is well recognized that the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of various diseases may differ between men and women. We recently reported a 7.4% rate of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia in community-dwelling osteoporotic patients. This study sought to investigate the role of gender in this complication.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective community-dwelling cohort.

METHOD

The databases of a large health maintenance organization were searched for adult patients treated with denosumab for osteoporosis in 2010-2018. Rates and predictors of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia (serum calcium ≤8.5 mg/mL) were analyzed by gender.

RESULTS

The cohort included 1871 women and 134 men. Compared with the women, the men were characterized by older median age (81 vs. 77 years, p = 0.005), higher likelihood to receive denosumab as a first-line treatment (22% vs. 6%, p < 0.001), less treatment with calcium supplements (42% vs. 53%, p = 0.012), and lower median eGFR level (66.1 vs. 79.8 mL/min/1.73m², p < 0.001). Denosumab-associated hypocalcemia developed in 133 women (7.1%) and 16 men (11.9%) (p = 0.04); the drug was discontinued in 75% and 61%, respectively. The strongest predictors of hypocalcemia in women were levels of pretreatment albumin-adjusted serum calcium (OR 0.08, 95% CI (0.04, 0.14)) and creatinine (OR 2.43, 95% CI (1.45, 4.05)). There were no predictors in men. On propensity matching of 126 men and 126 women, gender was not a predictor of hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab-treated men were significantly older than treated women and had a lower eGFR and more advanced osteoporosis. These findings suggest that selection bias rather than male genderper se underlies the higher rate of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia in men.

Bone Health Management After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Bone health disturbances commonly occur after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) foremost among them. BMD loss is related to pretransplantation chemotherapy and radiation exposure and immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and results from deficiencies in growth or gonadal hormones, disturbances in calcium and vitamin D homeostasis, as well as osteoblast and osteoclast dysfunction. Although the pathophysiology of AVN remains unclear, high-dose glucocorticoid exposure is the most frequent association. Various societal treatment guidelines for osteoporosis exist, but the focus is mainly on menopausal-associated osteoporosis. HCT survivors comprise a distinct population with unique comorbidities, making general approaches to bone health management inappropriate in some cases. To address a core set of 16 frequently asked questions (FAQs) relevant to bone health in HCT, the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines convened a panel of experts in HCT, adult and pediatric endocrinology, orthopedics, and oral medicine. Owing to a lack of relevant prospective controlled clinical trials that specifically address bone health in HCT, the answers to the FAQs rely on evidence derived from retrospective HCT studies, results extrapolated from prospective studies in non-HCT settings, relevant societal guidelines, and expert panel opinion. Given the heterogenous comorbidities and needs of individual HCT recipients, answers to FAQs in this article should be considered general recommendations, with good medical practice and judgment ultimately dictating care of individual patients. Readers are referred to the Supplementary Material for answers to additional FAQs that did not make the core set.

Osteoporosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Systemic Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the development of mineral bone disorder (MBD), osteoporosis, and fragility fractures. Among CKD patients, adynamic bone disease or low bone turnover is the most common type of renal osteodystrophy. The consequences of CKD-MBD include increased fracture risk, greater morbidity, and mortality. Thus, the goal is to prevent the occurrences of fractures by means of alleviating CKD-induced MBD and treating subsequent osteoporosis. Changes in mineral and humoral metabolism as well as bone structure develop early in the course of CKD. CKD-MBD includes abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, and/or vitamin D; abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth, or strength; and/or vascular or other soft tissue calcification. In patients with CKD-MBD, using either DXA or FRAX to screen fracture risk should be considered. Biomarkers such as bALP and iPTH may assist to assess bone turnover. Before initiating an antiresorptive or anabolic agent to treat osteoporosis in CKD patients, lifestyle modifications, such as exercise, calcium, and vitamin D supplementation, smoking cessation, and avoidance of excessive alcohol intake are important. Managing hyperphosphatemia and SHPT are also crucial. Understanding the complex pathogenesis of CKD-MBD is crucial in improving one's short- and long-term outcomes. Treatment strategies for CKD-associated osteoporosis should be patient-centered to determine the type of renal osteodystrophy. This review focuses on the mechanism, evaluation and management of patients with CKD-MBD. However, further studies are needed to explore more details regarding the underlying pathophysiology and to assess the safety and efficacy of agents for treating CKD-MBD.

Safety of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia in Patients With Preexisting Renal Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Although intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates are first-line medications for the management of hypercalcemia, studies examining their use in patients with preexisting renal dysfunction are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to describe the safety and efficacy of pamidronate and zoledronic acid in the treatment of hypercalcemia in patients with baseline renal dysfunction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of IV pamidronate and zoledronic acid in adult patients with hypercalcemia and creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 mL/min. The primary endpoint was incidence of all-grade serum creatinine (SCr) elevations. Secondary endpoints included refractory hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), corrected serum calcium (CSC) decrease ≥1.0 mg/dL by day 7 of bisphosphonate administration, and normalization of CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by days 10 and 30.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were included (n = 55 pamidronate, n = 58 zoledronic acid). The primary endpoint of all-grade SCr elevation occurred in 28 (24.8%) patients. Grades 3/4 SCr elevations occurred in 10.9% of patients treated with pamidronate and 1.7% of patients receiving zoledronic acid. Approximately 16% and 14% of patients developed grades 1 and 2 hypocalcemia, respectively, and there were no cases of ONJ. Overall, 64.6% of patients achieved normalization of CSC by day 10, and there were no statistical differences between bisphosphonate type and renal function.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The analysis suggests an association between IV bisphosphonates and increased rates of SCr elevations among patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. Future prospective studies are necessary to elucidate these findings.

Denosumab-induced severe hypocalcaemia in a patient with vitamin D deficiency

Postmenopausal women are at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporotic fractures carry an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis by inhibiting osteoclast-induced bone resorption. Hypocalcaemia is a known side-effect of denosumab treatment. The majority of such cases have been described in patients with underlying metastatic cancer or chronic kidney disease. We present a patient who developed severe hypocalcaemia after administration of denosumab in the context of severe vitamin D deficiency and a normal kidney function. The management was further complicated by hypophosphatemia. Following replacement of vitamin D, the patient's calcium and phosphate levels stabilised. The patient required intensive care monitoring for replacement of electrolytes. This case report emphasises the importance of screening and ongoing monitoring of risk factors for iatrogenic hypocalcaemia with denosumab treatment.

Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder

Purpose of review:

(1) To provide commentary on the 2017 update to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD); (2) to apply the evidence-based guideline update for implementation within the Canadian health care system; (3) to provide comment on the care of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (4) to identify research priorities for Canadian patients.

Sources of information:

The KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of CKD-MBD.

Methods:

The commentary committee co-chairs selected potential members based on their knowledge of the Canadian kidney community, aiming for wide representation from relevant disciplines, academic and community centers, and different geographical regions.

Key findings:

We agreed with many of the recommendations in the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of CKD-MBD. However, based on the uncommon occurrence of abnormalities in calcium and phosphate and the low likelihood of severe abnormalities in parathyroid hormone (PTH), we recommend against screening and monitoring levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH, and alkaline phosphatase in adults with CKD G3. We suggest and recommend monitoring these parameters in adults with CKD G4 and G5, respectively. In children, we agree that monitoring for CKD-MBD should begin in CKD G2, but we suggest measuring ionized calcium, rather than total calcium or calcium adjusted for albumin. With regard to vitamin D, we suggest against routine screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults with CKD G3-G5 and G1T-G5T and suggest following population health recommendations for adequate vitamin D intake. We recommend that the measurement and management of bone mineral density (BMD) be according to general population guidelines in CKD G3 and G3T, but we suggest against routine BMD testing in CKD G4-G5, CKD G4T-5T, and in children with CKD. Based on insufficient data, we also recommend against routine bone biopsy in clinical practice for adults with CKD or CKD-T, or in children with CKD, although we consider it an important research tool.

Limitations:

The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO. The CSN committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.

Hypocalcaemia following denosumab in prostate cancer: A clinical review

OBJECTIVES

Denosumab is often used in men with advanced prostate cancer to prevent skeletal-related events, but can be associated with severe hypocalcaemia. Our objective was to review the pathophysiology, identify risk factors and provide recommendations for prevention and management of denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia.

DESIGN

We reviewed the literature regarding denosumab-associated severe hypocalcaemia, defined as necessitating hospitalization for intravenous calcium treatment, in the context of prostate cancer.

PATIENTS

Men with prostate cancer with severe denosumab-associated hypocalcemia.

RESULTS

We identified 20 men with prostate cancer with severe denosumab-associated hypocalcemia, including the present case. Median age (range) was 70 years (45-86). All had skeletal metastases and presented with symptomatic hypocalcemia 16 days (4-35) after the initial (n = 18) or second (n = 2) denosumab treatment, with a serum total calcium of 1.36 mmol/L (1.13-1.91). The key risk factor was presence of active osteoblastic metastases, evidenced by elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, 838 U/L (58-2620) and supportive imaging. Other risk factors reported in some men included vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L), 25-OH vitamin D 44 nmol/L (22-81), renal impairment, serum creatinine 103 μmol/L (62-1131) and hypomagnesaemia, 0.82 mmol/L (0.29-1.20). Men received intravenous calcium infusions for 16 days (1-90), and median total intravenous elemental calcium requirements were 3.17 g (0.47-26.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab treatment in men with metastatic prostate cancer can be associated with life-threatening hypocalcaemia requiring prolonged hospitalization for intravenous calcium treatment. Modifiable risk factors should be corrected before denosumab administration. In men with active osteoblastic metastases, consideration should be given to delay denosumab treatment until underlying disease activity is controlled, and/or be administered with close monitoring and proactive treatment with calcium and calcitriol.

Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with osteoporosis: can you know who will get low?

Hypocalcemia was reported at low rates (0.05-1.7%) in denosumab-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This real-life study shows a 7.4% rate of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in community-dwelling osteoporotic men and women. Pretreatment serum calcium and creatinine levels are major predictors for this complication. Serum-calcium monitoring may help to identify and prevent severe hypocalcemia.

PURPOSE

RCTs have reported a 0.05-1.7% rate of hypocalcemia in denosumab-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, but long-term real-life data are lacking. We assessed the rate of hypocalcemia in osteoporotic community-dwelling patients treated with denosumab.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted based on medical records (2010-2018) from a large HMO. An albumin-adjusted serum calcium concentration lower than 8.5 mg/dL was defined as hypocalcemia.

RESULTS

We included 2005 patients (93% women, mean age 76 ± 9 years). Hypocalcemia developed during treatment in 149 patients (7.4%; 1% less than 8 mg/dL): in 66 after 0.5-1 years; 48 after 1-2 years; 35 after > 2 years. On comparison of the hypocalcemic and normocalcemic patients, the strongest predictors of hypocalcemia were pretreatment levels of albumin-adjusted serum calcium (9.1 ± 0.4 vs. 9.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.05) and creatinine (0.9 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.05). The hypocalcemia rate increased in parallel to a decrease in eGFR (p = 0.032 for the difference between eGFR ranges). Baseline calcium level ≤ 9.31 mg/dL predicted hypocalcemia with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 56%. A model of (- 2)*calcium + creatinine predicted hypocalcemia (3.7% when lower and 17.1% when higher than - 17.4). Gender, age, 25-hydroxyvitamin-D, parathyroid hormone, alkaline phosphatase, and whether denosumab was given as first or advanced line of osteoporotic therapy had no predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Real-life rates of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia are higher than previously reported. Hypocalcemia might develop after each dose of denosumab in ongoing treatment. Adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation are needed. Serum calcium monitoring is advised in high-risk patients for early detection of severe hypocalcemia.