Prevalence of preconception risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome among women from tribal and non-tribal blocks in Nashik district, India: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Although critical, the preconception phase in women's lives is comparatively ignored. The presence of some risk factors during this phase adversely affects the wellbeing of the woman and the pregnancy outcome. The study objectives were to measure the prevalence of various known risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome in the preconception period of women and their comparison between blocks.

METHODS

This was a community-based cross-sectional study in two tribal and two non-tribal blocks each in Nasik district, Maharashtra, India. The study included married women desiring to conceive within 1 year. Trained Accredited Social Health Activists (field level health worker) collected information from women using a validated interview schedule through house-to-house visits and obtained women's anthropometric measurements in a standard manner. The study assessed the presence of 12 documented risk factors.

RESULTS

The study enlisted 7875 women desiring pregnancy soon. The mean age of women was 23.19 (± 3.71) years, and 16% of them were adolescents. Women's illiteracy was higher in tribal areas than non-tribal (p < 0.001). About two-thirds of women have at least one risk factor, and 40.0% have a single risk factor. The most common risk factor observed was no formal education (44.35%). The prevalence of selected risk factors was significantly higher among women from tribal areas. The mean BMI of women was 19.73 (± 3.51), and a higher proportion (40.5%) of women from tribal areas had BMI < 18.5. Despite being of high parity status (≥ 4), about 7.7% of women from the tribal area and 3% from non-tribal desired pregnancy. Tobacco and alcohol consumption was higher among tribal women. The majority of women consumed meals with family members or husbands. Protein and calorie intake of about 1.4% of women was less than 50% of the recommended daily allowance; however, most of them perceived to have abundant food.

CONCLUSIONS

Health risks, namely younger age, illiteracy, high parity, consumption of tobacco, low protein, and calorie intake, were quite prevalent, and the risks were significantly more among women from tribal areas. "Continuum of care" must comprise preconception care inclusive of Behavioral Change Communication, particularly for easily modifiable risk factors and specially for tribal women.

Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Maternal underweight (BMI < 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI < 18.5.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy).

RESULTS

We included 14,246 patients between January 2011 and November 2017, among whom 12,648 (88.8 %) had normal BMI, 1269 were considered mild underweight (17 ≤ BMI < 18.5 kg/m²) and 329 (2.3 %) were considered severe to moderate underweight (BMI < 17 kg/m²). The risk of preterm birth was all the greater as the thinness was severe (ORa: 1.34 [1.12-1.60] and ORa 1.77 [1.31-2.34]) and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation also increased with severe thinness (ORa: 1.63 [1.35-1.96] and ORa 2.28 [1.69-3.07]). The risk of a caesarean section or scheduled labour was no different. Neonatal parameters were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms an increased risk of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation with increased thinness after adjusting for confounding factors. This link had only been shown previously in 2 studies Neither the type of prematurity (induced or spontaneous) nor the severity of prematurity is influenced by the severity of thinness; however, the low prevalence of thinness limits the power of these data. It would be interesting to study the medico-economic relevance of a policy of close maternal-foetal surveillance in this target population.

The gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes among underweight women with twin pregnancies: Propensity score matched analysis from a three-year retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

No recommendations are available for gestational weight gain (GWG) in underweight women with twin pregnancies. We aimed to evaluate whether underweight women with twin pregnancies should gain more weight than normal-weight women in order to optimize perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study compared the GWG and perinatal outcomes among normal-weight and underweight women who gave birth to viable twins between 2015 and 2018 at the Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Foshan, China. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was categorized as adequate or inadequate GWG, based on the US Institute of Medicine 2009 guidelines for normal-weight women (≥ 0.46 kg/week). The outcomes of interest included spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) <37 weeks, <35 and <32 weeks, small for gestational age (SGA), gestational hypertensive disorder (GHD), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), birth weight discordance (BDW) ≥20%, neonatal intensive unit (NICU) admission and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Propensity score matching (PSM, in a 1:1 ratio) was utilized to minimize the effects of confounders on the differences in the two cohorts. Multivariable logistic models were also used to verify the results from PSM analysis.

RESULTS

There were 475 normal-weight and 111 underweight women included in the analysis. Our results suggested that the incidence of adequate GWG was comparable between underweight and normal-weight women (37.5% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.141). The prevalence of GDM was significantly lower among underweight women (9.9%) than among normal-weight women (20.4%) (P = 0.010). There was no evidence of differences in other perinatal outcomes between the two groups. 102 underweight women and 102 normal-weight women were included in PSM analyses. There was a lower incidence of GDM in underweight women than in normal-weight women, but the difference was not significant (9.8% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.071). No evidence of any differences in the other outcomes, including sPTB, GHD, BWD≥20%, SGA, NICU admission and NRDS, was found between the underweight and normal-weight women. Multivariable logistic regression models yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

For Chinese twin pregnant women with twin pregnancies, our data does provide evidence to suggest underweight women need to gain more weight than normal-weight women to optimize perinatal outcomes. Future studies with larger number of underweight women with twin gestations are warranted to establish an optimal range of GWG.

Maternal body mass index and risk of neonatal adverse outcomes in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Maternal body mass index is linked to short- and long-term unfavorable health outcomes both for child and mother. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies to evaluate maternal BMI and the risk of harmful neonatal outcomes in China.

METHODS

Six databases identified 2454 articles; 46 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The dichotomous data on maternal BMI and harmful neonatal outcomes were extracted. Pooled statistics (odds ratios, ORs) were derived from Stata/SE, ver. 12.0. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the results. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analyses explored heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis revealed that compared with normal BMI, high maternal BMI is associated with fetal overgrowth, defined as macrosomia ≥4000 g (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.75-2.09); birth weight ≥ 90% for gestational age (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.64-2.15); and increased risk of premature birth (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25-2.52) and neonatal asphyxia (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39-2.17). Maternal underweight increased the risk of low birth weight (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.93) and small for gestational age (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.51-2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Raised as well as low pre-pregnancy BMI is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Management of weight during pregnancy might help reduce their adverse neonatal outcomes in future intervention studies or programmes.

Maternal anemia and birth weight: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between maternal anemia and low/insufficient birth weight.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study of pregnant women who underwent prenatal care at the healthcare units in a municipality of northeast Brazil together with their newborn infants was carried out. The pregnant women were classified as having anemia when the hemoglobin level was below 11 g/dl. Infants who were born full term weighing less than 2500 grams were classified as low birth weight, and those weighing between 2500 and 2999 grams were classified as insufficient weight. The occurrence of maternal anemia and its association with birth weight was verified using crude and adjusted Relative Risk (RR) estimates with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

The final sample was comprised of 622 women. Maternal anemia was considered a risk factor for low/insufficient birth weight, after adjusting the effect measurement for maternal age, family income, urinary infection, parity, alcoholic beverage consumption during pregnancy and gestational body mass index: RRadjusted = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.07 to 1.77].

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal anemia was associated with low/insufficient birth weight, representing a risk factor for the gestational outcomes studied.

Gestational diabetes mellitus in underweight women

Objective: To compare outcomes of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in underweight women with those of normal pregravid BMI.Methods: We used a population-based dataset to identify singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM in underweight and normal weight women.Results: Among women with GDM, we identified 301 and 6494 women with pregravid underweight and normal BMI. Underweight women were younger, more often nulliparous, and had lower birth weight (p < .05) and lower incidence of birth weight > 4000 g (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.6) as compared to normal weight GDM women.Conclusions: It appears that pregravid maternal weight rather than GDM might be responsible for larger babies. A dose-response relationship should be established, however.