How to Differentiate Borderline Hepatic Nodules in Hepatocarcinogenesis: Emphasis on Imaging Diagnosis

Mean ADC values and arterial phase hyperintensity discriminate small (≤ 3 cm) well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodule

BACKGROUND/AIM

This research endeavor sought to distinguish small (≤ 3 cm) well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WD-HCC) from dysplastic nodules (DN) by employing traditional imaging features and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (mADC) values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we assessed a cohort of ninety patients with confirmed dysplastic nodules (DNs) (n = 71) or well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WD-HCC) (n = 41) who had undergone dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging between March 2018 and June 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were executed to pinpoint characteristics that can effectively differentiate histologic grades. A region-of-interest (ROI) encompassing all lesion voxels was delineated on each slice containing the mass in the ADC map. Subsequently, the whole-lesion mean ADC (mADC) were computed from these delineations. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the discriminatory efficacy of the mADC values in distinguishing between WD-HCC and DN.

RESULTS

Among the histopathological types from benign to malignant, mADC showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001). The mADCs were effective in distinguishing WD-HCC from DN [AUC, 0.903 (95% CI 0.849-0.958)]. The best cutoffs for the Youden index were 0.0012 mm2/s for mADC, with moderate sensitivity (70.7%) and high specificity (94.4%). MRI features including hyperintensity at arterial phase (odds ratio, 21.2; P = 0.009), mADC < 0.0012 mm2/s (odds ratio, 52.2; P < 0.001) were independent predictors for WD-HCC at multivariable analysis. The AUC value of hyperintensity at arterial phase was 0.857 (95% CI 0.786-0.928). The composite diagnostic criterion of arterial hyperintensity + mADC < 0.0012 mm2/s showed good performance [AUC, 0.926 (95% CI 0.878-0.975)], displaying increased sensitivity compared to individual assessments involving arterial hyperintensity (P = 0.013), mADC < 0.0012 mm2/s (P = 0.004), or LR-5 (P < 0.001), with similar specificity compared to LR-5 (P = 0.193).

CONCLUSION

DN and WD-HCC displayed contrasting diffusion characteristics, attainable to distinguish with satisfactory accuracy. The utilization of arterial phase hyperintensity and mADC < 0.0012 on MRI facilitated the differentiation of WD-HCC from DN.

Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of "washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all p < 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all p > 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.

Liver Lesions at Risk of Transformation into Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement

Recent technical advances in liver imaging and surveillance for patients at high risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to an increase in the detection of borderline hepatic nodules in the gray area of multistep carcinogenesis, particularly in those that are hypointense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and do not show arterial phase hyperenhancement. Given their potential to transform and advance into hypervascular HCC, these nodules have progressively attracted the interest of the scientific community. To date, however, no shared guidelines have been established for the decision management of these borderline hepatic nodules. It is therefore extremely important to identify features that indicate the malignant potential of these nodules and the likelihood of vascularization. In fact, a more complete knowledge of their history and evolution would allow outlining shared guidelines for their clinical-surgical management, to implement early treatment programs and decide between a preventive curative treatment or a watchful follow-up. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on hepatic borderline nodules, particularly focusing on those imaging features which are hypothetically correlated with their malignant evolution, and to discuss current guidelines and ongoing management in clinical practice.

Up-to-Date Role of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This article overviews Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), a system that standardizes techniques, interpretation and reporting of imaging studies done for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, diagnosis, and locoregional treatment response assessment. LI-RADS includes 4 algorithms, each of which defines ordinal categories reflecting probability of the assessed outcome. The categories, in turn, guide patient management. The LI-RADS diagnostic algorithms provide diagnostic criteria for the entire spectrum of lesions found in at-risk patients. In addition, the use of LI-RADS in clinical care improves clarity of communication between radiologists and clinicians and may improve the performance of inexperienced users to the levels of expert liver imagers.

Impact of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Size on Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Enhancement Features

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor size on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement features, especially in tumors with diameters ≤30 mm and <10 mm.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions and divided them into three groups on the basis of tumor size. All patients underwent Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS examinations before surgery. B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) features and CEUS enhancement patterns were evaluated according to current World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines criteria. The χ2- and Student t-tests were used to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

We included 132 patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions from November 2020 to September 2022. On the basis of tumor size, patients were divided into group 1 (<10 mm, n = 5), group 2 (10-30 mm, n = 54) and group 3 (>30 mm, n = 73). On BMUS, most HCCs appeared heterogeneous but predominantly hypo-echoic (61.4%, 81/132) with ill-defined margins and irregular shapes. Meanwhile, iso-echoic features were more common in small HCCs ≤30 mm (15.3%, 9/59), but a mixed hyper- and hypo-echoic appearance was more common in HCCs >30 mm (17.8%, 13/73) (p = 0.003). On Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, all HCCs presented arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (100.0%, 132/132). Most HCCs >30 mm exhibited heterogeneous hyperenhancement (86.3%, 63/73), whereas nearly one-third of small HCCs ≤30 mm exhibited homogeneous hyperenhancement (35.6%, 21/59) (p = 0.003). In the portal venous phase, there was a significantly higher proportion of washout in HCCs >30 mm (84.9%, 62/73) than in small HCCs ≤30 mm (64.4%, 38/59) (p = 0.006). During the Kupffer phase, 11 additional hypo-enhanced lesions (mean size: 14.1 ± 4.1 mm, iso-echoic on BMUS), which were also suspected to be HCC lesions, were detected in 5 patients with small HCCs ≤30 mm and 4 patients with HCCs >30 mm. All 5 cases of HCCs <10 mm exhibited APHE and late washout (>60 s). The majority (3/5, 60%) exhibited washout in the portal venous phase (70, 74 and 75 s), one case did so in the late phase (125 s) and another in the Kupffer phase (420 s).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size had a significant impact on the washout features of HCC lesions on Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS. Small HCC lesions ≤30 mm had a higher proportion of relatively late washout in comparison to larger lesions. Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS might be helpful in the detection and characterization of HCC lesions <10 mm.

Predicting Outcome after Percutaneous Ablation for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Various Imaging Modalities

Percutaneous ablation is a low-invasive, repeatable, and curative local treatment that is now recommended for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is not suitable for surgical resection. Poorly differentiated HCC has high-grade malignancy potential. Microvascular invasion is frequently seen, even in tumors smaller than 3 cm in diameter, and prognosis is poor after percutaneous ablation. Biopsy has a high risk of complications such as bleeding and dissemination; therefore, it has limitations in determining HCC tumor malignancy prior to treatment. Advances in diagnostic imaging have enabled non-invasive diagnosis of tumor malignancy. We describe the usefulness of ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting outcome after percutaneous ablation for HCC.

Current Concepts of Precancerous Lesions of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Progress in Diagnosis

The most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. It is proposed that precancerous lesions of HCC include all stages of the disease, from dysplastic foci (DF), and dysplastic nodule (DN), to early HCC (eHCC) and progressed HCC (pHCC), which is a complex multi-step process. Accurately identifying precancerous hepatocellular lesions can significantly impact the early detection and treatment of HCC. The changes in high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) were similar to those seen in HCC, and the risk of malignant transformation significantly increased. Nevertheless, it is challenging to diagnose precancerous lesions of HCC. We integrated the literature and combined imaging, pathology, laboratory, and other relevant examinations to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of precancerous lesions.

Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains not only a cause of a considerable part of oncologic mortality, but also a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Early detection of the disease and consequential adequate therapy are imperative to increase patients' quality of life and survival. Imaging plays, therefore, a crucial role in the surveillance of patients at risk, the detection and diagnosis of HCC nodules, as well as in the follow-up post-treatment. The unique imaging characteristics of HCC lesions, deriving mainly from the assessment of their vascularity on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), allow for a more accurate, noninvasive diagnosis and staging. The role of imaging in the management of HCC has further expanded beyond the plain confirmation of a suspected diagnosis due to the introduction of ultrasound and hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents, which allow for the detection of hepatocarcinogenesis even at an early stage. Moreover, the recent technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology contribute an important tool for the diagnostic prediction, prognosis and evaluation of treatment response in the clinical course of the disease. This review presents current imaging modalities and their central role in the management of patients at risk and with HCC.

[CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): Standardization, Evidence, and Future Direction]

The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) has been developed with the support of the American College of Radiology to standardize the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 has been incorporated in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance. This review examines the effect of CT/MRI LI-RADS on the standardized reporting of liver imaging, and the evidence in diagnosing HCC and evaluating treatment response after locoregional treatment using CT/MRI LI-RADS. The results are compared with other HCC diagnosis guidelines, and future directions are described.

State-of-the-art review on the correlations between pathological and magnetic resonance features of cirrhotic nodules

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become the second greatest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the newest advancements in liver imaging have improved the diagnosis of both overt malignancies and premalignant lesions, such as cirrhotic or dysplastic nodules, which is crucial to improve overall patient survival rate and to choose the best treatment options. The role of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has grown in the last 20 years. In particular, the introduction of hepatospecific contrast agents has strongly increased the definition of precursor nodules and detection of high-grade dysplastic nodules and early HCCs. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of liver tumours in cirrhotic patients sometimes remains challenging for radiologists, thus, in doubtful cases, biopsy and histological analysis become critical in clinical practice. This current review briefly summarizes the history of imaging and histology for HCC, covering the newest techniques and their limits. Then, the article discusses the links between radiological and pathological characteristics of liver lesions in cirrhotic patients, by describing the multistep process of hepatocarcinogenesis. Explaining the evolution of pathologic change from cirrhotic nodules to malignancy, the list of analyzed lesions provides regenerative nodules, low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nodules, small HCC and progressed HCC, including common subtypes (steatohepatitic HCC, scirrhous HCC, macrotrabecular massive HCC) and more rare forms (clear cell HCC, chromophobe HCC, neutrophil-rich HCC, lymphocyte-rich HCC, fibrolamellar HCC). The last chapter covers the importance of the new integrated morphological-molecular classification and its association with radiological features.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease. Worldwide, it ranks sixth in terms of incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer-related deaths. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is used as an add-on test to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma after prior diagnostic tests such as abdominal ultrasound or measurement of alpha-foetoprotein, or both. According to guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging investigation, with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may show the typical hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks in people with cirrhosis, which will be sufficient to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas show atypical imaging features, and therefore, are missed at imaging. Dynamic CEUS images are obtained similarly to CT and MRI images. CEUS differentiates between arterial and portal venous phases, in which sonographic hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks, such as arterial hyperenhancement and subsequent washout appearance, are investigated. The advantages of CEUS over CT and MRI include real-time imaging, use of contrast agents that do not contain iodine and are not nephrotoxic, and quick image acquisition. Despite the advantages, the use of CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC remains controversial, with disagreement on relevant guidelines. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival as the conflicting results can be a consequence of an inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Therefore, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is needed for either diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma or ruling it out in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. 2. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in people with chronic liver disease and identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The last date of search was 5 November 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver, and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods to screen studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We used the bivariate model and provided estimates of summary sensitivity and specificity. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We presented uncertainty-of-the-accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies with 6546 participants. Studies were published between 2001 and 2021. We judged all 23 studies at high-risk of bias in at least one domain, and 13/23 studies at high concern for applicability. Most studies used different reference standards to exclude the presence of the target condition. The time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. We also had major concerns on their applicability due to the characteristics of the participants. - CEUS for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.8% (95% CI 69.4% to 84.4%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 89.1% to 96.6%) (23 studies, 6546 participants; very low-certainty evidence). - CEUS for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 62.9% to 87.6%) and specificity 92.7% (95% CI 86.8% to 96.1%) (13 studies, 1257 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, including only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted with no knowledge of the results about the index test, showed no differences in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that by using CEUS, as an add-on test following abdominal ultrasound, to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would unnecessarily undergo further testing or inappropriate treatment. As to resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 23% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would incorrectly be unresected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo further inappropriate testing or treatment. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias of the included studies, heterogeneity, and imprecision of the results and concerns on their applicability limit our ability to draw confident conclusions.

Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Evolution: Correlation with CEUS LI-RADS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver with a high incidence worldwide and a high associated mortality. Well-recognized risk factors that cause a predisposition to the development of HCC include chronic infection with the hepatitis B or C virus, alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease, and cirrhosis. In these chronically diseased livers, benign regenerative nodules can increase in size and develop cellular atypia that progress into dysplastic nodules and ultimately HCC. This sequence of hepatocarcinogenesis is coupled with changes in nodule vascularity, including progressive decreased density of portal triads and induced neoangiogenesis, resulting in increased hepatic arterial recruitment. Changes in vascularity result in an array of patterns of nodule enhancement and washout, which can be sensitively depicted with dynamic real-time contrast-enhanced US. Regenerative nodules are isoenhancing relative to the liver with all phases, while HCC classically shows avid arterial phase hyperenhancement with late mild washout. In between, there is great variation as nodules evolve through progressive grades of dysplasia toward HCC. Observed patterns of enhancement and washout can be used to diagnose or stratify the risk of malignancy in liver nodules by using the diagnostic algorithm described by the American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). This facilitates the detection and close monitoring of potential early-stage disease. LI-RADS categorizes nodules according to a probabilistic likelihood for HCC with criteria for LR-5 nodules that are highly specific for the diagnosis of HCC, allowing treatment without exposing the patient to invasive biopsy. An invited commentary by Fetzer is available online. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

The Imaging Diagnosis of Patients with Shoulder Pain Caused by Sports Injury

The shoulder joint is the most complex and movable joint of the human body. A variety of diseases can affect the shoulder joint and cause shoulder pain. Sports injuries are an important and common cause of shoulder pain. In the clinical diagnosis of shoulder joint injury, the most commonly used diagnostic methods are X-ray photography and CT imaging, but X-ray photography has poor ability to distinguish shoulder joints and other tiny tissue structures and has a sense of inspiration for shoulder joint injuries. In addition, CT arthrography has a certain risk to the lesion and is easy to form trauma, and it cannot clearly show the shoulder joint structures such as the rotator cuff and the labrum. Therefore, this article conducts MR imaging diagnostic research on patients with shoulder pain caused by sports injuries and plays an important role in imaging. This article deeply studied the clinical manifestations of shoulder joint pain and image processing technology, designed a research experiment on imaging diagnosis results of patients with shoulder joint pain caused by sports injuries, selected 87 patients with shoulder joint pain in a hospital, and analyzed X-ray photography, CT imaging, and MR imaging diagnosis, three methods to compare the diagnostic accuracy and inspection results and conduct an in-depth analysis of the causes of shoulder joint injury. The experimental results showed that there were 87 patients with shoulder joint pain, 65 patients with rotator cuff tear were diagnosed using arthroscopy, and 63 patients with rotator cuff tear were diagnosed by MR imaging. The accuracy rate was as high as 95.6%. Among them, the proportion caused by sports injuries is the highest, reaching 56%.

Clinical features and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of hepatic dysplastic nodules

Hepatic dysplastic nodules (DNs) are a group of neoplastic lesions with a diameter of more than 1 cm that belong to precancerous lesions, with abnormal cytoplasm and cells but without malignant basis in histology. Hepatic DNs lack typical tumor markers and clinical symptoms, and their clinical diagnosis relys mainly on imaging or/and tissue pathological examination. Thanks to the further research on the pathogenesis of hepatic DNs and the development of imaging technology, the combination of medical history, various examinationss, individual tumor markers, and imaging and histopathology techniques can significantly improve the early detection and diagnosis accuracy for hepatic DNs, and reduce the rate of missed and false diagnosis. Due to the potential malignancy risk of hepatic DNs, intervention measures should be carried out on hepatic DNs at all stages, in order to block the transformation process of DNs into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is of great clinical significance to reduce the incidence and mortality of HCC.

Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Microwave Ablation (MWA) versus Laser-Induced Thermotherapy (LITT)

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) as a local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC,) with regard to therapy response, survival rates, and complication rates as measurable outcomes. This retrospective study included 250 patients (52 females and 198 males; mean age: 66 ± 10 years) with 435 tumors that were treated by MWA and 53 patients (12 females and 41 males; mean age: 67.5 ± 8 years) with 75 tumors that were treated by LITT. Tumor response was evaluated using CEMRI (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging). Overall, 445 MWA sessions and 76 LITT sessions were performed. The rate of local tumor progression (LTP) and the rate of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) were 6% (15/250) and 46% (115/250) in the MWA-group and 3.8% (2/53) and 64.2% (34/53) in the LITT-group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates calculated from the date of diagnosis were 94.3%, 65.4%, and 49.1% in the MWA-group and 96.2%, 54.7%, and 30.2% in the LITT-group, respectively (p-value: 0.002). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 45.9%, 30.6%, and 24.8% in the MWA-group and 54.7%, 30.2%, and 17% in the LITT-group, respectively (p-value: 0.719). Initial complete ablation rate was 97.7% (425/435) in the MWA-group and 98.7% (74/75) in the LITT-group (p-value > 0.99). The overall complication rate was 2.9% (13/445) in the MWA-group and 7.9% (6/76) in the LITT-group (p-value: 0.045). Based on the results, MWA and LITT thermal ablation techniques are well-tolerated, effective, and safe for the local treatment of HCC. However, MWA is recommended over LITT for the treatment of HCC, since the patients in the MWA-group had higher survival rates.

Risk Factors for Hypervascularization in Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine risk factors for hypervascularization in hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to May 7, 2020. Studies which evaluated radiologic and clinical risk factors for hypervascularization in HBP hypointense nodules without APHE were included. Hazard ratios were meta-analytically pooled using random-effects model. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with 934 patients were included. HBP hypointense nodules without APHE with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity, and restricted diffusion showed risk for hypervascularization with pooled HRs of 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-4.20), 4.21 (95% CI, 1.15-15.40), 5.83 (95% CI, 1.42-23.95), respectively. Previous HCC history contributed to hypervascularization of the nodules with hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.23-3.44). T1 hyperintensity, intralesional fat, Child-Pugh Class B, sex, alfa-fetoprotein, hepatitis B or C infection were not significant risk factors for hypervascularization (p ≥0.05). Study quality was generally moderate.

CONCLUSION

HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion and previous hepatocellular carcinoma history pose higher risk for hypervascularization. Proper patient management in patients with HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may need to be tailored according to these risk factors.

Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US.

METHODS

We constructed three AI models based on still B-mode images: model-1 using 24,675 images, model-2 using 57,145 images, and model-3 using 70,950 images. A convolutional neural network was used to train the US images. The four-class liver tumor discrimination by AI, namely, cysts, hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic tumors, was examined. The accuracy of the AI diagnosis was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation. The diagnostic performances of the AI models and human experts were also compared using an independent test cohort of video images.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of model-1, model-2, and model-3 in the four tumor types are 86.8%, 91.0%, and 91.1%, whereas those for malignant tumor are 91.3%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. In the independent comparison of the AIs and physicians, the percentages of correct diagnoses (accuracies) by the AIs are 80.0%, 81.8%, and 89.1% in model-1, model-2, and model-3, respectively. Meanwhile, the median percentages of correct diagnoses are 67.3% (range 63.6%-69.1%) and 47.3% (45.5%-47.3%) by human experts and non-experts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the AI models surpassed that of human experts in the four-class discrimination and benign and malignant discrimination of liver tumors. Thus, the AI models can help prevent human errors in US diagnosis.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Current and Emerging Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Early detection of HCC enables patients to avail curative therapies that can improve patient survival. Current international guidelines advocate for the enrollment of patients at high risk for HCC, like those with cirrhosis, in surveillance programs that perform ultrasound every 6 months. In recent years, many studies have further characterized the utility of established screening strategies and have introduced new promising tools for HCC surveillance. In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers for the detection of HCC. We discuss the role of imaging tools like ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the early detection of HCC, and describe recent innovations which can potentially enhance their applicability, including contrast enhanced ultrasound, low‐dose CT scans, and abbreviated MRI. Next, we outline the data supporting the use of three circulating biomarkers (i.e., alpha‐fetoprotein [AFP], AFP lens culinaris agglutinin‐reactive fraction, and des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin) in HCC surveillance, and expand on multiple emerging liquid biopsy biomarkers, including methylated cell‐free DNA (cfDNA), cfDNA mutations, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumor cells. These promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers have the potential to improve early detection, and thus improve survival, in patients with HCC.

Proteomic Profiling of Hepatocellular Adenomas Paves the Way to Diagnostic and Prognostic Approaches

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Through an exploratory proteomic approach based on typical hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), we previously identified a diagnostic biomarker for a distinctive subtype of HCA with high risk of bleeding, already validated on a multicenter cohort. We hypothesized that the whole protein expression deregulation profile could deliver much more informative data for tumor characterization. Therefore, we pursued our analysis with the characterization of HCA proteomic profiles, evaluating their correspondence with the established genotype/phenotype classification and assessing whether they could provide added diagnosis and prognosis values.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

From a collection of 260 cases, we selected 52 typical cases of all different subgroups on which we built a reference HCA proteomics database. Combining laser microdissection and mass-spectrometry-based proteomic analysis, we compared the relative protein abundances between tumoral (T) and nontumoral (NT) liver tissues from each patient and we defined a specific proteomic profile of each of the HCA subgroups. Next, we built a matching algorithm comparing the proteomic profile extracted from a patient with our reference HCA database. Proteomic profiles allowed HCA classification and made diagnosis possible, even for complex cases with immunohistological or genomic analysis that did not lead to a formal conclusion. Despite a well-established pathomolecular classification, clinical practices have not substantially changed and the HCA management link to the assessment of the malignant transformation risk remains delicate for many surgeons. That is why we also identified and validated a proteomic profile that would directly evaluate malignant transformation risk regardless of HCA subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

This work proposes a proteomic-based machine learning tool, operational on fixed biopsies, that can improve diagnosis and prognosis and therefore patient management for HCAs.

Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences in the detection of the dysplastic nodule (DN).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two authors independently. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) 2 in RevMan software was used to score the included studies and assess their methodological quality. A random-effects model was used for statistical pooling by Meta-Disc. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (335 DN lesions in total) were included in our meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of T₂WI was 0.87. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of DWI were 0.81 (95%CI, 0.73-0.87), 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86-0.93), 7.04 (95%CI, 4.49-11.04), and 0.24 (95%CI, 0.17-0.33) respectively. In the arterial phase, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR were 0.89 (0.84-0.93), 0.75 (0.72-0.79), 3.72 (2.51-5.51), and 0.17 (0.12-0.25), respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the delayed phase were 0.78 (0.72-0.83), 0.60 (0.55-0.65), 2.19 (1.55-3.10), and 0.36 (0.23-0.55) separately. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the hepatobiliary phase were 0.77 (0.71-0.82), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 8.74 (5.91-12.92), and 0.24 (0.14-0.41) respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and PLR were higher on DWI and hepatobiliary phase in diagnosing LGDN than HGDN.

CONCLUSION

MR sequences, particularly DWI, arterial phase, and hepatobiliary phase imaging demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for DN.

KEY POINTS

• MRI has dramatically improved the detection and accurate diagnosis of DNs and their differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma. • Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MRI sequences in the detection of DN has not been studied before. • Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MRI achieves a high diagnostic value for DN, especially when using DWI, arterial phase imaging, and hepatobiliary phase imaging.

The value of hepatobiliary phase in EOB-MRI in predicting hypervascularization outcome of non-hypervascular hypointense lesions in high-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To estimate the role of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in predicting hypervascularization outcome of non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic lesions in high-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Under the premise of non-hyperenhance in arterial phase (AP) and hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of EOB-MRI, 29 fresh lesions from 22 patients with chronic viral hepatitis (median (range) age: 69(57-82) years) were prospectively enrolled. During continuously followed-up by EOB-MRI, lesional vascularity in AP, the signal intensity (SI) ratios of lesions-to-parenchyma in HBP images (post-contrast ratio) and adjusted enhancement with reference of unenhanced images (EOB enhancement ratio) were examined.

RESULTS

After 644 (220-2912) days of follow-up, 20 lesions changed into hyperenhancement in AP of EOB-MRI (hypervascularized group), while nine remained non-hyperenhanced (maintained non-hypervascular group). There is no statistical difference of post-contrast ratio at the initial detection. The post-contrast ratios in hypervascularized group were different between each follow-up time point when followed-up ≥ three (P < 0.01) and four (P < 0.05) times, and exposed a linear downward trend with time. Between the hypervascularized and maintained non-hypervascular groups, there were significant differences in the post-contrast ratio at endpoint for three-times' follow-up (P < 0.001); and at the second (P = 0.037), third follow-up time points (P = 0.005), endpoint (P = 0.005) for four-times' follow-up. EOB enhancement ratio showed inter-group difference only at endpoint for three-times' follow-up (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

For non-hypervascular, HBP hypointense hepatic lesions, decreasing trend of SI in HBP may early predict unfavorable hypervascularized outcome.

Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global instances of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths for men. Despite that abdominal ultrasound (US) is used as an initial test to exclude the presence of focal liver lesions and serum alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) measurement may raise suspicion of HCC occurrence, further testing to confirm diagnosis as well as staging of HCC is required. Current guidelines recommend surveillance programme using US, with or without AFP, to detect HCC in high-risk populations despite the lack of clear benefits on overall survival. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of US and AFP may clarify whether the absence of benefit in surveillance programmes could be related to under-diagnosis. Therefore, assessment of the accuracy of these two tests for diagnosing HCC in people with chronic liver disease, not included in surveillance programmes, is needed.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: the diagnostic accuracy of US and AFP, alone or in combination, for the diagnosis of HCC of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal US and AFP, alone or in combination, for the diagnosis of resectable HCC; to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the individual tests versus the combination of both tests; to investigate sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, until 5 June 2020. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of US and AFP, independently or in combination, for the diagnosis of HCC in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional and case-control designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver, histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion, or typical characteristics on computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, all with a six-months follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest-plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 373 studies. The index-test was AFP (326 studies, 144,570 participants); US (39 studies, 18,792 participants); and a combination of AFP and US (eight studies, 5454 participants). We judged at high-risk of bias all but one study. Most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Most studies with AFP had a case-control design. We also had major concerns for the applicability due to the characteristics of the participants. As the primary studies with AFP used different cut-offs, we performed a meta-analysis using the hierarchical-summary-receiver-operating-characteristic model, then we carried out two meta-analyses including only studies reporting the most used cut-offs: around 20 ng/mL or 200 ng/mL. AFP cut-off 20 ng/mL: for HCC (147 studies) sensitivity 60% (95% CI 58% to 62%), specificity 84% (95% CI 82% to 86%); for resectable HCC (six studies) sensitivity 65% (95% CI 62% to 68%), specificity 80% (95% CI 59% to 91%). AFP cut-off 200 ng/mL: for HCC (56 studies) sensitivity 36% (95% CI 31% to 41%), specificity 99% (95% CI 98% to 99%); for resectable HCC (two studies) one with sensitivity 4% (95% CI 0% to 19%), specificity 100% (95% CI 96% to 100%), and one with sensitivity 8% (95% CI 3% to 18%), specificity 100% (95% CI 97% to 100%). US: for HCC (39 studies) sensitivity 72% (95% CI 63% to 79%), specificity 94% (95% CI 91% to 96%); for resectable HCC (seven studies) sensitivity 53% (95% CI 38% to 67%), specificity 96% (95% CI 94% to 97%). Combination of AFP (cut-off of 20 ng/mL) and US: for HCC (six studies) sensitivity 96% (95% CI 88% to 98%), specificity 85% (95% CI 73% to 93%); for resectable HCC (two studies) one with sensitivity 89% (95% CI 73% to 97%), specificity of 83% (95% CI 76% to 88%), and one with sensitivity 79% (95% CI 54% to 94%), specificity 87% (95% CI 79% to 94%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained, and only in part referable to different cut-offs or settings (surveillance programme compared to clinical series). The sensitivity analyses, excluding studies published as abstracts, or with case-control design, showed no variation in the results. We compared the accuracy obtained from studies with AFP (cut-off around 20 ng/mL) and US: a direct comparison in 11 studies (6674 participants) showed a higher sensitivity of US (81%, 95% CI 66% to 90%) versus AFP (64%, 95% CI 56% to 71%) with similar specificity: US 92% (95% CI 83% to 97%) versus AFP 89% (95% CI 79% to 94%). A direct comparison of six studies (5044 participants) showed a higher sensitivity (96%, 95% CI 88% to 98%) of the combination of AFP and US versus US (76%, 95% CI 56% to 89%) with similar specificity: AFP and US 85% (95% CI 73% to 92%) versus US 93% (95% CI 80% to 98%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of HCC in adults, AFP and US, singularly or in combination, have the role of triage-tests. We found that using AFP, with 20 ng/mL as a cut-off, about 40% of HCC occurrences would be missed, and with US alone, more than a quarter. The combination of the two tests showed the highest sensitivity and less than 5% of HCC occurrences would be missed with about 15% of false-positive results. The uncertainty resulting from the poor study quality and the heterogeneity of included studies limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Differentiation of small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas from benign nodules in cirrhotic liver: the added additive value of MRI-based radiomics analysis to LI-RADS version 2018 algorithm

Background

Accurate characterization of small nodules in a cirrhotic liver is challenging. We aimed to determine the additive value of MRI-based radiomics analysis to Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADS v 2018) algorithm in differentiating small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) from benign nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 150 cirrhosis patients with histopathologically confirmed small liver nodules (HCC, 112; benign nodules, 44) were evaluated from January 2013 to October 2018. Based on the LI-RADS algorithm, a LI-RADS category was assigned for each lesion. A radiomics signature was generated based on texture features extracted from T1-weighted, T2W, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. A nomogram model was developed for the combined diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

Results

A radiomics signature consisting of eight features was significantly associated with the differentiation of HCCs from benign nodules. Both LI-RADS algorithm (area under ROC [A_z] = 0.898) and the MRI-Based radiomics signature (A_z = 0.917) demonstrated good discrimination, and the nomogram model showed a superior classification performance (A_z = 0.975). Compared with LI-RADS alone, the combined approach significantly improved the specificity (97.7% vs 81.8%, p = 0.030) and positive predictive value (99.1% vs 92.9%, p = 0.031) and afforded comparable sensitivity (97.3% vs 93.8%, p = 0.215) and negative predictive value (93.5% vs 83.7%, p = 0.188).

Conclusions

MRI-based radiomics analysis showed additive value to the LI-RADS v 2018 algorithm for differentiating small HCCs from benign nodules in the cirrhotic liver.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01710-y.

MRI Ancillary Features for LI-RADS Category 3 and 4 Observations: Improved Categorization to Indicate the Risk of Hepatic Malignancy

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ancillary features can help stratify malignancy risk in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category 3 (LR-3) and 4 (LR-4) observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective longitudinal study included 106 LR-3 or LR-4 observations on gadolinium-enhanced MRI obtained from January 2014 to December 2015 in 80 patients who were treatment naïve and at risk (mean age, 58.0 ± 10.7 [SD] years; 60 men). The presence of major and ancillary features, the category determined using only major features, and the final category adjusted by the application of ancillary features were retrospectively analyzed. MRI features were compared using generalized estimating equations, and cumulative incidence curves for malignancy were compared using log-rank tests with a resampling extension. RESULTS. At 6-month follow-up, the cumulative incidence of observations initially categorized as LR-4, observations upgraded to LR-4, observations initially categorized as LR-3, and observations downgraded to LR-3 were 62.5%, 29.7%, 6.2%, and 0%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of malignancy did not differ between observations categorized by major feature as LR-3 and LR-4 (p = 0.12), but was higher in final observations categorized as LR-4 than in those categorized as LR-3 (p < 0.001). Among observations categorized by major feature as LR-3, the cumulative incidence of malignancy was higher in observations upgraded to LR-4 than in observations that were initially graded as LR-3 (p = 0.03), which showed differences in the frequency of restricted diffusion and mild-to-moderate T2-weighted hyperintensity (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION. Final categories determined with ancillary features, instead of categories determined by major features only, can help indicate malignancy risk in LR-3 and LR-4 observations on MRI.

Enhancement patterns of small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 30 mm) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics

PURPOSE

To analyze the correlation between enhancement patterns of small hepatic carcinomas (HCCs; ≤ 30 mm) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and the clinicopathologic characteristics.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 346 inpatients (288 males and 58 females) with 372 pathologically confirmed small HCCs between January 2017 and December 2018. All patients underwent CEUS examination before pathological examination. Statistical analysis was used to determine the correlation between enhancement patterns of small HCCs on CEUS and clinicopathologic characteristics including serum alpha-feto-protein level, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) level, primary or recurrent HCC condition, tumor number, tumor differentiation, tumor size, liver background and microvascular invasion (MVI).

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-seven out of 372 (93.3 %) HCCs manifested arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE). The arterial enhancement patterns were correlated with the tumor differentiation (odds ratio = 10.336, P = 0.000). Moderately- or poorly-differentiated HCCs were more likely to display APHE than well-differentiated HCCs (96.2 % vs 58.6 %, P < 0.001). Two hundred ninety-five of 372 (79.3 %) HCCs showed washout in the portal venous/late phase. Washout was correlated with serum PIVKA-II level, tumor size, tumor differentiation, and MVI on univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only tumor size was significantly associated with washout of small HCCs (odds ratio = 2.335, P = 0.006). Large HCCs (20-30 mm) displayed a higher proportion of washout compared with that of HCCs ≤ 20 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement patterns of small HCCs on CEUS were significantly correlated with tumor size and tumor differentiation among all clinicopathologic characteristics.

MRI contrast enhancement of liver pre-neoplasia using iron-tannic nanoparticles

The most challenging part of liver cancer detection is finding it in the very early stages. It has been argued that liver preneoplasia is found at the very earliest stages of liver cancer. The presence of a lesion is closely related to the development of HCC. We report herein a new class of iron-based T₁ MRI contrast agents which are nanoparticles of iron–tannic complexes (so-called Fe–TA NPs) that can be used for detecting liver preneoplasia. Preliminary assessment of their toxicity in healthy rats provides suitable imaging dose ranges with acceptable toxicity. In diethylnitrosamine (DEN) induced rats, it is shown that Fe–TA NPs are capable of enhancing MRI signals in rat livers having pre-neoplastic lesions within 60 minutes post-injection. The enhancement efficacy is strongly dependent on the characteristics of pre-neoplastic foci (GST-P+ foci). The highest enhancement was in good correlation with the size of GST-P+ foci and amount of Fe–TA NPs accumulated in the liver, and might be caused by the dysfunction of liver sinusoids along with cellular uptake capability of pre-neoplastic hepatocytes. Our results show that Fe–TA NPs are of great interest to develop as an efficient MRI imaging agent for risk assessment of liver cancer.

Imaging liver preneoplasia could be considered beneficial in first-line assessment of early stage liver cancer.

Characterization of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma and High-Grade Dysplastic Nodules on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Correlation With Histopathologic Findings

OBJECTIVES

To explore the enhancement features of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, including well-differentiated HCC and high-grade dysplastic nodules with a focus of HCC) and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), correlated with the histopathologic findings.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 81 patients with 85 pathologically confirmed hepatic lesions (69 early HCCs and 16 HGDNs). All of the hepatic lesions were examined by CEUS with SonoVue (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy) before surgery or biopsy. The enhancement features of early HCCs and HGDNs were evaluated and compared with histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight (55.1%) early HCCs showed arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE). The major enhancement pattern of early HCCs was APHE without portal venous/late-phase wash-out (20 of 69 [29.0%]). Eight (11.6%) early HCCs manifested APHE. Wash-out was observed in 30 (43.5%) early HCCs. Sixteen (23.2%) early HCCs showed very-late wash-out (>120 seconds). Wash-out was not observed in all HGDNs. Of the 16 HGDNs, arterial-phase isoenhancement without portal venous/late-phase wash-out was the major enhancement pattern (n = 7 [43.8%]). The degree of CD34 expression of sinusoidal endothelial cells was more diffuse in early HCCs than in HGDNs (56.5% versus 12.5%; P = .001). Arterial-phase enhancement patterns of early HCCs on CEUS were correlated with the degree of CD34 expression (P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement patterns were significantly different between early HCCs and HGDNs on CEUS. Diffuse CD34 expression of sinusoidal endothelial cells in early HCC was correlated with APHE on CEUS.

Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging

On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: A Multicenter Study

Background Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may indicate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or nonmalignant cirrhosis-associated nodules. Purpose To assess the distribution of pathologic diagnoses of HBP hypointense nodules without APHE at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and to evaluate clinical and imaging features in differentiating their histologic grades. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included pathologic analysis-confirmed HBP hypointense nodules without APHE (≤30 mm) in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis screened between January 2008 and June 2016. Central pathologic review by 10 pathologists determined final histologic grades as progressed HCC, early HCC, high-grade dysplastic nodule (DN), and low-grade DN or regenerative nodule. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features were analyzed by three radiologists. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with elastic net regularization were performed to identify clinical and imaging features for differentiating histologic grades. Results There were 298 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 10; 226 men) with 334 nodules evaluated, and progressed HCCs were diagnosed in 44.0% (147 of 334), early HCCs in 20.4% (68 of 334), high-grade DNs in 27.5% (92 of 334), and low-grade DNs or regenerative nodules in 8.1% (27 of 334). Serum α-fetoprotein level 100 ng/mL or greater (odds ratio, 2.7; P = .01) and MRI features including well-defined margin (odds ratio, 5.5; P = .003), hypointensity at precontrast T1-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.2; P < .001), intermediate hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.4; P < .001), and restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .04) were independent predictors for progressed HCC at multivariable analysis. Conclusion In patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI corresponded mainly to progressed HCCs, early HCCs, and high-grade dysplastic nodules. High α-fetoprotein level and some imaging features at MRI helped to differentiate progressed HCC from lower grade nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Motosugi in this issue.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

Differentiation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Dysplastic Nodules in Cirrhotic Liver: Texture Analysis Based on MRI Improved Performance in Comparison Over Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MR and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Background: Accurate characterization of small (3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) and dysplastic nodules (DNs) in cirrhotic liver is challenging. We aimed to investigate whether texture analysis (TA) based on T2-weighted images (T2WI) is superior to qualitative diagnosis using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing sHCC from DNs in cirrhosis.

Materials and methods: Sixty-eight patients with 73 liver nodules (46 HCCs, 27 DNs) pathologically confirmed by operation were included. For imaging diagnosis, three sets of images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists in consensus: a Gd-EOB-MRI set, a DWI set, and a combined set (combination of Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI). For TA, 279 texture features resulting from T2WI were extracted for each lesion. The performance of each approach was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A_z), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined.

Results: The performance of TA (A_z = 0.96) was significantly higher than that of imaging diagnosis using Gd-EOB-MRI set (A_z = 0.86) or DWI set (A_z = 0.80) alone in differentiation of sHCC from DNs (P = 0.008 and 0.025, respectively). The combination of Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI showed a greater sensitivity (95.6%) but reduced specificity (66.7%). The specificity of TA (92.6%) was significantly higher than that of the combined set (P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in sensitivity (97.8 vs. 95.6%, P = 0.559).

Conclusion: TA-based T2WI showed a better classification performance than that of qualitative diagnosis using Gd-EOB-MRI and DW imaging in differentiation of sHCCs from DNs in cirrhotic liver. TA-based MRI may become a potential imaging biomarker for the early differentiation HCCs from DNs in cirrhosis.

Vessel co-option in cancer

All solid tumours require a vascular supply in order to progress. Although the ability to induce angiogenesis (new blood vessel growth) has long been regarded as essential to this purpose, thus far, anti-angiogenic therapies have shown only modest efficacy in patients. Importantly, overshadowed by the literature on tumour angiogenesis is a long-standing, but continually emerging, body of research indicating that tumours can grow instead by hijacking pre-existing blood vessels of the surrounding nonmalignant tissue. This process, termed vessel co-option, is a frequently overlooked mechanism of tumour vascularization that can influence disease progression, metastasis and response to treatment. In this Review, we describe the evidence that tumours located at numerous anatomical sites can exploit vessel co-option. We also discuss the proposed molecular mechanisms involved and the multifaceted implications of vessel co-option for patient outcomes.

Cirrhotic Nodule Transformation to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Natural History and Predictive Biomarkers on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to identify sonographic biomarkers predicting or indicating eventual malignant transformation of pathologically confirmed cirrhotic nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-nine consecutive patients with 44 pathologically confirmed cirrhotic nodules (mean size, 17.5 ± 8.5 [SD] mm) who initially underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination at detection and then underwent follow-up conventional ultrasound every 3-4 months thereafter were retrospectively included. Malignant transformation was identified on the basis of noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma or rebiopsy. Malignant transformation biomarkers were identified from clinical and sonographic variables and the performance thereof was evaluated using ROC curves. RESULTS. Fourteen nodules (31.8%) had eventual malignant transformation after a median follow-up time of 26.7 months. At initial detection, nodule size (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p = 0.019) and a contrast arrival time difference between the nodule and liver of more than 0.5 second (HR, 4.35; p = 0.011) were independent predictors for malignant transformation. The area under the ROC curve (A_z) of initial nodule size (A_z = 0.64, p = 0.131) and contrast arrival time difference between the nodule and liver (A_z = 0.66, p = 0.029) improved after combining the two (A_z = 0.75, p = 0.002). During follow-up, echogenicity change (p = 0.044), absolute growth rate (p < 0.001), and relative growth rate (p < 0.001) correlated with malignant transformation. Sensitivity analysis revealed that an absolute growth rate of 5 mm or greater in 6 months or a relative growth rate of 30% or greater in 6 months could be considered as threshold growth for identifying malignant transformation (specificity, 100.0%; positive predictive value, 100.0%). The absence of both echogenicity change and threshold growth was highly accurate in excluding malignant transformation (sensitivity, 100.0%; negative predictive value, 100.0%). CONCLUSION. The contrast arrival time difference between the nodule and liver at initial detection was useful in stratifying eventual malignant transformation risk for cirrhotic nodules. During follow-up, growth rate and echogenicity change correlated with malignant transformation; threshold growth on ultrasound may be considered a potential major feature in noninvasive diagnostic criteria of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatobiliary versus Extracellular MRI Contrast Agents in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection: Hepatobiliary Phase Features in Relation to Disease-free Survival

Background MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material is more sensitive than MRI with extracellular contrast material in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose To determine whether postsurgical outcomes differ between patients who undergo MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material and those who undergo MRI with extracellular contrast material by analyzing disease-free survival (DFS) rates after curative resection of HCC. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to December 2015, 170 treatment-naïve patients who underwent contrast-enhanced preoperative liver MRI and curative hepatic resection for HCC were retrospectively included and observed until September 2018. DFS rates were compared between the two groups, which were classified based on the type of MRI contrast agent used. The MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material group was further divided into a hypointense nodule-positive group and a hypointense nodule-negative group according to the presence of residual hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) after surgery. DFS rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared among the three groups by using a log-rank test. Results Patients were included in either the MRI with extracellular contrast material group (n = 53; mean age, 60 years ± 9 [standard deviation]) or the hepatobiliary contrast material group (n = 117; mean age, 60 years ± 8; 26 patients were in the hypointense nodule-positive group). Over a median follow-up period of 34.1 months, median DFS rates did not differ between the extracellular contrast material group (35.8 months) and the hepatobiliary contrast material group (43.5 months) (P = .46). However, median DFS in the extracellular contrast material group was longer than that in the hypointense nodule-positive group (35.8 months vs 25.8 months, P < .001) and shorter than that in the hypointense nodule-negative group (35.8 months vs 48.6 months, P = .02). Conclusion Patients who undergo preoperative MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material and resection of hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement may show better disease-free survival. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Motosugi in this issue.

Abdominal ultrasound and alpha‐fetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Diagnostic test accuracy). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound and alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP), alone or in combination, for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of any size and at any stage in people with chronic advanced liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting.

Current status and perspectives for computer-aided ultrasonic diagnosis of liver lesions using deep learning technology

An ultrasound (US) examination is a common noninvasive technique widely applied for diagnosis of a variety of diseases. Based on the rapid development of US equipment, many US images have been accumulated and are now available and ready for the preparation of a database for the development of computer-aided US diagnosis with deep learning technology. On the contrary, because of the unique characteristics of the US image, there could be some issues that need to be resolved for the establishment of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in this field. For example, compared to the other modalities, the quality of a US image is, currently, highly operator dependent; the conditions of examination should also directly affect the quality of US images. So far, these factors have hampered the application of deep learning-based technology in the field of US diagnosis. However, the development of CAD and US technologies will contribute to an increase in diagnostic quality, facilitate the development of remote medicine, and reduce the costs in the national health care through the early diagnosis of diseases. From this point of view, it may have a large enough potential to induce a paradigm shift in the field of US imaging and diagnosis of liver diseases.

MR with Gd-EOB-DTPA in assessment of liver nodules in cirrhotic patients

To date the imaging diagnosis of liver lesions is based mainly on the identification of vascular features, which are typical of overt hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex and multistep event during which, a spectrum of nodules develop within the liver parenchyma, including benign small and large regenerative nodule (RN), low-grade dysplastic nodule (LGDN), high-grade dysplastic nodule (HGDN), early HCC, and well differentiated HCC. These nodules may be characterised not only on the basis of their respective different blood supplies, but also on their different hepatocyte function. Recently, in liver imaging the introduction of hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent offered the clinicians the possibility to obtain, at once, information not only related to the vascular changes of liver nodules but also information on hepatocyte function. For this reasons this new approach becomes the most relevant diagnostic clue for differentiating low-risk nodules (LGDN-RN) from high-risk nodules (HGDN/early HCC or overt HCC) and consequently new diagnostic algorithms for HCC have been proposed. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents is constantly increasing and gradually changing the standard of diagnosis of HCC. The main purpose of this review is to underline the added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA in early-stage diagnoses of HCC. We also analyse the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCC, the key concepts of HCC development, growth and spread and the imaging appearance of precursor nodules that eventually may transform into overt HCC.

Novel serum microRNAs panel on the diagnostic and prognostic implications of hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To determine a panel of serum microRNAs (miRNAs) that could be used as novel biomarkers for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We initially screened 9 out of 754 serum miRNAs by TaqMan Low Density Array in two pooled samples respectively from 35 HCC and 35 normal controls, and then validated individually by RT-qPCR in another 114 patients and 114 controls arranged in two phases. The changes of the selected miRNAs after operation and their prognostic value were examined.

RESULTS

miR-375, miR-10a, miR-122 and miR-423 were found to be significantly higher in HCC than in controls (P < 0.0001), and the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for the 4-miRNA panel was 0.995 (95%CI: 0.985-1). All the four miRNAs were significantly reduced after surgical removal of the tumors (P < 0.0001), while still higher than normal controls (at least P < 0.05)

CONCLUSION

The four serum miRNAs (miR-375, miR-10a, miR-122 and miR-423) could potentially serve as novel biomarkers for the diagnostic and prognostic of HCC.

Recent advances in non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver is an important tool for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions and for assessment of diffuse liver disease, having several intrinsic characteristics, represented by high soft tissue contrast, avoidance of ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast media, and more recently, by application of several functional imaging techniques (i.e., diffusion-weighted sequences, hepatobiliary contrast agents, perfusion imaging, magnetic resonance (MR)-elastography, and radiomics analysis). MR functional imaging techniques are extensively used both in routine practice and in the field of clinical and pre-clinical research because, through a qualitative rather than quantitative approach, they can offer valuable information about tumor tissue and tissue architecture, cellular biomarkers related to the hepatocellular functions, or tissue vascularization profiles related to tumor and tissue biology. This kind of approach offers in vivo physiological parameters, capable of evaluating physiological and pathological modifications of tissues, by the analysis of quantitative data that could be used in tumor detection, characterization, treatment selection, and follow-up, in addition to those obtained from standard morphological imaging. In this review we provide an overview of recent advanced techniques in MR for the diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma, and their role in the assessment of response treatment evaluation.