1
|
Jiang C, Feng Q, Zhang Z, Qiang Z, Du A, Xu L, Li J. Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:188. [PMID: 39049043 PMCID: PMC11267765 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03473-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the 2 principal minimally invasive surgical approaches and the first line of treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is not clear which one has greater safety and efficacy. In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the safety and effectiveness of LH versus RFA for patients with HCC, especially where perioperative and postoperative outcomes differrent. METHODS In PROSPERO, a meta-analysis with registration number CRD42021257575 was registered. Using an established search strategy, we systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase to identify eligible studies before June 2023. Data on operative times, blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Overall, the present meta-analysis included 8 retrospective and 6 PSM studies comprising 1,848 patients (810 and 1,038 patients underwent LH and RFA). In this meta-analysis, neither LH nor RFA showed significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate and 5-year RFS rate. Despite this, in comparison to the RFA group, LH resulted in significantly higher 1-year(p<0.0001) and 3-year RFS rate (p = 0.005), higher 5-year OS rate (p = 0.008), lower local recurrence rate (p<0.00001), longer length of stay(LOS) (p<0.0001), longer operative time(p<0.0001), more blood loss (p<0.0001), and higher rate of complications (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Comparative studies indicate that LH seemed to provide better OS and lower local recurrence rate, but higher complication rate and longer hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuang Jiang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qingbo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zeyuan Qiang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ao Du
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Xu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Dafang County People's Hospital, Bijie, Guizhou Province, 551600, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsu PJ, Wu SY, Chen WM, Chang YC, Chou TC, Chiang MF, Lee MC, Soong RS. Survival impact of pre-transplant local treatments in liver transplant recipients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res 2024; 14:3555-3564. [PMID: 39113877 PMCID: PMC11301294 DOI: 10.62347/bxdx8100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different pre-transplant local treatments on the survival of liver transplantation (LTx) recipients with BCLC Stage A Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research Databases spanning 2012 to 2018. Employing propensity score matching, patients were categorized into three groups: those receiving local treatments (180 patients), hepatectomy (179 patients), and combined treatments (180 patients). The primary outcomes were overall mortality and HCC-specific death, assessed using time-varying Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. During a median follow-up period of 3.92 years, all-cause mortality rates were observed as 74.44% for local treatments, 42.46% for hepatectomy, and 65.00% for combined treatments. HCC-specific mortality rates followed a similar pattern at 65.00%, 39.11%, and 59.44%, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios demonstrated significantly elevated mortality risks associated with local and combined treatments compared to hepatectomy. Notably, the 2-year overall and HCC-specific survival rates were highest in the hepatectomy group, surpassing those observed in both the combined treatment and local treatment groups. The findings of our study highlight that for patients with BCLC Stage A HCC, undergoing hepatectomy prior to LTx is associated with superior survival outcomes compared to solely local treatments. This underscores the importance of considering hepatectomy as a vital component of the treatment strategy in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Jung Hsu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Road, Wenshan District, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Yuan Wu
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei 242, Taiwan
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei 242, Taiwan
- Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia UniversityTaichung 41354, Taiwan
- Big Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai HospitalYilan 265501, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai HospitalYilan 265501, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia UniversityTaichung 41354, Taiwan
- Centers for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Ming Chen
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei 242, Taiwan
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei 242, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Cheng Chang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Road, Wenshan District, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Chun Chou
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Road, Wenshan District, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Feng Chiang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai HospitalYilan 265, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Che Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 291, Jhongjheng Road, Jhonghe, New Taipei 23561, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center for Organ Transplantation, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 110, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Ruey-Shyang Soong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Road, Wenshan District, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 116, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityNo. 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center for Organ Transplantation, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 110, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei 110, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaaban Abdelgalil M, Amer BE, Yasen N, El-Samahy M, Awad AK, Elfakharany B, Saeed O, Abd-ElGawad M. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with early and small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:47. [PMID: 38326841 PMCID: PMC10848480 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03292-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 90% of cases worldwide and a significant contributor to cancer-related deaths. This study comprehensively compares the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus laparoscopic or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (LRFA or PRFA) in patients with early and small HCC. METHODS We systematically searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to include studies comparing LLR versus LRFA or PRFA in patients with early HCC meets the Milan criteria (defined as solitary nodule < 5 cm or three nodules ≤ 3 cm with no extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion). Pooled results were examined for overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, local, intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence rates, and complications. We conducted subgroup analyses based on the type of RFA. Meta-regression analyzed the association between overall survival, local recurrence, and various factors. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We analyzed the data using the R (v.4.3.0) programming language and the "meta" package of RStudio software. RESULTS We included 19 observational studies, compromising 3756 patients. LLR showed higher 5-year overall survival compared to RFA (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.06, 1.3], P > 0.01). Our subgroup analysis showed that LLR had higher 5-year survival than PRFA (RR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.02, 1.31], P = 0.03); however, there was no significant difference between LLR and LRFA (RR = 1.26, 95% CI [0.98, 1.63], P = 0.07). LLR was associated with higher disease-free survival) RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.05, 1.35], P < 0.01; RR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.31, 1.98], P < 0.01(and recurrence-free survival) RR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.09, 1.35], P < 0.01; RR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.15, 1.84], P < 0.01(at 1 and 3 years. LLR was associated with lower local (RR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.16, 0.47], P < 0.01) and intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.7, 95% CI [0.5, 0.97], P = 0.03) than RFA. However, complications were significantly higher with LLR (RR = 2.01, 95% CI [1.51, 2.68], P < 0.01). Our meta-regression analysis showed that younger patients had higher risk for local recurrence (P = 0.008), while age wasn't significantly linked to overall survival (P = 0.25). Other covariates like total bilirubin, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and tumor size also showed no significant associations with either overall survival or local recurrence. CONCLUSION LLR offers improved long-term outcomes and lower recurrence rates than PRFA. However, no significant distinctions were observed between LRFA and LLR in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and local recurrence. More robust well-designed RCTs are essential to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Noha Yasen
- Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Misr University for Science and Technology, Cairo, Egypt
- Medical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA
| | | | - Ahmed K Awad
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Bahaa Elfakharany
- Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Omar Saeed
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cabibbo G, Daniele B, Borzio M, Casadei-Gardini A, Cillo U, Colli A, Conforti M, Dadduzio V, Dionisi F, Farinati F, Gardini I, Giannini EG, Golfieri R, Guido M, Mega A, Minozzi S, Piscaglia F, Rimassa L, Romanini L, Pecorelli A, Sacco R, Scorsetti M, Viganò L, Vitale A, Trevisani F. Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2023: Italian practice Treatment Guidelines of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery (AICEP), Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO), Italian Association of Radiology and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), Italian Society of Pathological Anatomy and Diagnostic Cytology (SIAPeC-IAP), Italian Society of Surgery (SIC), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), Italian Organ Transplant Society (SITO), and Association of Patients with Hepatitis and Liver Disease (EpaC) - Part I - Surgical treatments. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:223-234. [PMID: 38030455 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of HCC management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the first part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and surgical treatments of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties PROMISE, University of Palermo, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.
| | - Bruno Daniele
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mauro Borzio
- Centro Diagnostico Italiano (CDI), Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2-Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Agostino Colli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Trasfusionale ed Ematologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Dadduzio
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Mons. A.R.Dimiccoli" Hospital, Barletta, ASL BT, Italy
| | - Francesco Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute - Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Ivan Gardini
- EpaC Onlus, Italian Liver Patient Association, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Giovanni Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Alma Mater Studiorum" Bologna University, Bologna, Italy; Radiology Unit Madre Fortunata Toniolo Private Hospital, coordinator of Radiology centers Medipass Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Guido
- Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova- Italy
| | - Andrea Mega
- Department of Gastronterology, Regional Hospital Bolzano, Italy
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Romanini
- Radiology Unit, Ospedale di Cremona, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Anna Pecorelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Minimally Invasive General & Oncologic Surgery, Humanitas Gavazzeni University Hospital, Viale M. Gavazzeni 21, 24125 Bergamo, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Viale Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vitale
- General Surgery 2-Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Trevisani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy; Unit of Semeiotics, Liver and Alcohol-Related Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wade R, South E, Anwer S, Sharif-Hurst S, Harden M, Fulbright H, Hodgson R, Dias S, Simmonds M, Rowe I, Thornton P, Eastwood A. Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-172. [PMID: 38149643 PMCID: PMC11017143 DOI: 10.3310/gk5221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A wide range of ablative and non-surgical therapies are available for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with very early or early-stage disease and preserved liver function. Objective To review and compare the effectiveness of all current ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm). Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Nine databases (March 2021), two trial registries (April 2021) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Review methods Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of ablative and non-surgical therapies, versus any comparator, for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomised controlled trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and mapped. The comparative effectiveness of therapies was assessed using network meta-analysis. A threshold analysis was used to identify which comparisons were sensitive to potential changes in the evidence. Where comparisons based on randomised controlled trial evidence were not robust or no randomised controlled trials were identified, a targeted systematic review of non-randomised, prospective comparative studies provided additional data for repeat network meta-analysis and threshold analysis. The feasibility of undertaking economic modelling was explored. A workshop with patients and clinicians was held to discuss the findings and identify key priorities for future research. Results Thirty-seven randomised controlled trials (with over 3700 relevant patients) were included in the review. The majority were conducted in China or Japan and most had a high risk of bias or some risk of bias concerns. The results of the network meta-analysis were uncertain for most comparisons. There was evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection is inferior to radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.82), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% credible interval 1.11 to 1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 1.02 to 1.39) and local recurrence (relative risk 1.80, 95% credible interval 1.19 to 2.71). Percutaneous acid injection was also inferior to radiofrequency ablation for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% credible interval 1.05 to 2.51). Threshold analysis showed that further evidence could plausibly change the result for some comparisons. Fourteen eligible non-randomised studies were identified (n ≥ 2316); twelve had a high risk of bias so were not included in updated network meta-analyses. Additional non-randomised data, made available by a clinical advisor, were also included (n = 303). There remained a high level of uncertainty in treatment rankings after the network meta-analyses were updated. However, the updated analyses suggested that microwave ablation and resection are superior to percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for some outcomes. Further research on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was recommended at the workshop, although it is only appropriate for certain patient subgroups, limiting opportunities for adequately powered trials. Limitations Many studies were small and of poor quality. No comparative studies were found for some therapies. Conclusions The existing evidence base has limitations; the uptake of specific ablative therapies in the United Kingdom appears to be based more on technological advancements and ease of use than strong evidence of clinical effectiveness. However, there is evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection are inferior to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and resection. Study registration PROSPERO CRD42020221357. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131224) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ros Wade
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Emily South
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sumayya Anwer
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sahar Sharif-Hurst
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Melissa Harden
- Information Specialist, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Helen Fulbright
- Information Specialist, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Robert Hodgson
- Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sofia Dias
- Professor in Health Technology Assessment, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Ian Rowe
- Honorary Consultant Hepatologist, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - Alison Eastwood
- Professor of Research, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang Y, Qin Y, Dong P, Ning H, Wang G. Liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, and radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for very-early- and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis for comparison of efficacy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:991944. [PMID: 36387091 PMCID: PMC9650158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.991944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of liver resection (LR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (RFA+TACE) in the treatment of very-early- and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS We systemically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational analyses with propensity score-matched cohort analyses (PSMs) comparing any two of the three treatments were included in this study. The primary result was overall survival (OS) and the secondary result was recurrence-free survival (RFS), which were analyzed by calculating the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS A total of 25 studies (4249 patients), including 10 RCTs and 15 PSM observational studies, met the inclusion criteria. Although there was no significant difference between LR and RFA in terms of one-year OS, though LR showed superior performance for three- and five-year OS (at three years, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.96; at five years, HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.94). In addition, significantly higher rates of RFS at one-, three- and five-year follow-up were found for LR than for RFA alone (at one year, HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92; at three years, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.81; at five years, HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.78). The combination of RFA+TACE was superior to RFA alone based on one-year RFS (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.96), while there were no significant differences in OS at one, three, and five years, and in RFS at three and five years. CONCLUSIONS For very-early- and early-stage HCC, this systematic review and network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of LR is superior to that of RFA alone, regardless of whether the evaluation is based on either OS or RFS. The advantages of RFA+TACE compared to RFA alone are limited, and further studies are needed to determine whether combination therapy is necessary, i.e., results in significantly improved outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The study was registered with http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022299269.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunlong Zhang
- School of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Yunlong Qin
- School of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Peng Dong
- School of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Houfa Ning
- School of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Guangzhi Wang
- School of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ding W, Yu J, Liu F, Yu X, Cheng Z, Han Z, Liang P. Percutaneous microwave ablation versus robot-assisted hepatectomy for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A real-world single-center study. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:243-250. [PMID: 34244109 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both microwave ablation and robot-assisted hepatectomy are representative minimally invasive treatments for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study compares the practicability and medium-term therapeutic efficacy between them. METHODS Patients with early HCC treated by MWA or RH from 2013 to 2019 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) were used to minimize baseline imbalance. Operation trauma, postoperative recovery, complications, cost and oncological efficacy were compared. RESULTS 401 patients with a median follow-up of 28 months were included (MWA n = 240; RH n = 161). After PSM, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of MWA group and RH group were 52.2% vs 65.8%, 91.5% vs 91.3% and 91.5% vs 91.3%, respectively. OS and CSS were comparable (p = 0.44 and 0.96), while RFS of MWA was slightly lower but not significant (p = 0.097). The above results after IPTW followed the same trend. After PSM, MWA showed advantages in operation time and blood loss, while RH performed better in postoperative liver function. There was no significant difference in incidence of severe complications between two groups. CONCLUSIONS For early HCC parents, both treatments can achieve good, safe and comparable medium-term therapeutic effects. MWA is more minimally invasive, while RH has better accuracy and causes less damage to liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenzhen Ding
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Fangyi Liu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Xiaoling Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Zhigang Cheng
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Zhiyu Han
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Address:28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853 China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu J, Cheng ZG, Han ZY, Liu FY, Zheng RQ, Cheng W, Wei Q, Yu SY, Li QY, He GZ, Luo YC, Yu XL, Liang P. Period-Dependent Survival Benefit of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 12-Year Real-World, Multicentric Experience. Liver Cancer 2022; 11:341-353. [PMID: 35978603 PMCID: PMC9294937 DOI: 10.1159/000522134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although microwave ablation (MWA) is a promising technique for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, its 10-year efficacy is unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess whether the advances in MWA for HCC translated into a real-world survival benefit. METHODS This retrospective study included 2,354 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0 to B from 5 hospitals, with at least 2 years of follow-up for all the patients. Recurrence and survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with time-period stratification. RESULTS A total of 5,326 HCCs (mean diameter, 2.9 cm ± 1.2) underwent 4,051 sessions of MWA with a median follow-up of 61.3 (0.6-169.5 range) months during 3 periods (2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018). Technical success was achieved in 5,194 (97.5%) tumors with significant improvement over time, especially for >3.0-cm HCC (p < 0.001). Local tumor progression (LTP) showed no period-dependent advance, with >3.0-cm HCC and perivascular location being the risk factors for LTP. The median intrahepatic metastasis time was 27.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.2-28.8) months, with 5- and 10-year occurrence rates of 68.8% and 79.4%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year overall survivals were 63.9% and 41.1%, respectively, and BCLC stage 0, A, and all B patients showed an observable survival improvement over time (p < 0.001). The median disease-free survival time increased from 19.4 (95% CI: 16.5-22.6) months in 2007-2010 to 28.1 (95% CI: 25.9-32.3) months in 2015-2018. The improved survival for early recurrent (≤2 years) patients was period-dependent, as verified by Cox regression analyses. The major complications rate per procedure was 3.0% (122/4,051). CONCLUSIONS These real-world data show that MWA provided an upward trend in survival for HCC patients with BCLC stage 0-B over a 12-year follow-up period. An encouraging clear survival benefit in early recurrent patients was also observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Gang Cheng
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Han
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fang-Yi Liu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rong-Qin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Cheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin City, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nangjing, China
| | - Song-Yuan Yu
- Department of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Tianyou Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Qin-ying Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Puyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Henan Province, Puyang, China
| | - Guang-zhi He
- Department of Ultrasound, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yan-chun Luo
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ling Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College& 5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China,*Ping Liang,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jinhuan Y, Yi W, Yuanwen Z, Delin M, Xiaotian C, Yan W, Liming D, Haitao Y, Lijun W, Tuo D, Kaiyu C, Jiawei H, Chongming Z, Daojie W, Bin J, Gang C. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Early-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Mastering the Learning Curve: A Multicenter Data-Based Matched Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:742544. [PMID: 35070961 PMCID: PMC8777042 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.742544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the only widely accepted curative method for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, little is known about the efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection for ICC, especially in patients with early-stage disease. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term effects of laparoscopy and open surgery for the treatment of ICC. METHODS Data from 1,084 patients treated at three hospitals from January 2011 to December 2018 were selected and analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the long-term outcomes (overall survival and recurrence-free survival) and short-term outcomes (perioperative outcomes) of all-stage and early-stage patients. RESULTS After matching, 244 patients (122 vs. 122) in the all-stage group and 65 patients (27 vs. 38) in the early-stage group were included. The baseline of the two groups was balanced, and no significant differences were found in sex or age. The short-term results of the laparoscopic group were better than those of the open group, including less blood loss [blood loss ≥400 ml 27 (22.1%) vs. 6 (4.92%), p<0.001 for all-stage, 12 (31.6%) vs. 2 (7.41%), p=0.042 for early stage), shorter surgery [200 (141; 249) min vs. 125 (115; 222) min, p=0.025 for early stage] and shorter hospital stay [11.0 (9.00; 16.0) days vs. 9.00 (7.00; 12.0) days, p=0.001 for all stage, 11.0 (8.50; 17.8) days vs. 9.00 (6.50; 11.0) days, p=0.011 for early stage]. Regarding long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found for all-stage patients, while there were significant differences observed for the early-stage group (p=0.013 for OS, p=0.014 for RFS). For the early-stage patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of the OLR group were 84.2, 65.8, and 41.1%, respectively, and those of the LLR group were 100, 90.9, and 90.9%, respectively. The RFS rates of the OLR group were 84.2, 66.7, and 41.7%, respectively, and those of the LLR group were and 92.3, 92.3, and 92.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients treated with laparoscopy seemed to have better short-term outcomes, such as less blood loss, shorter operation duration, and shorter hospital stay, than patients undergoing open surgery. Based on the long-term results, laparoscopic treatment for early ICC may have certain advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Jinhuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Yi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zheng Yuanwen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Ma Delin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chen Xiaotian
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Yan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Deng Liming
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yu Haitao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wu Lijun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Deng Tuo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chen Kaiyu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Hu Jiawei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zheng Chongming
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wang Daojie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jin Bin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chen Gang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang S, Lin H, Song J. Efficacy and safety of various primary treatment strategies for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int 2021; 21:681. [PMID: 34923980 PMCID: PMC8684647 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02365-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several treatments are available for treatment of early and very early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma, also known as small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SHCC). However, there is no consensus with regards to the efficacies of these methods. We aimed at identifying the most effective initial treatment strategy for SHCC through Bayesian network meta-analyses. METHODS Studies published between January, 2010, and February, 2021 were searched in EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of science databases, and conference proceedings for trials. The included studies reported the survival outcomes of very early and early Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients subjected to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), surgical resection (SR), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), minimally invasive liver surgery (MIS), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and cryoablation (CA). Then, data were extracted from studies that met the inclusion criteria. Patient survival data were retrieved from the published Kaplan-Meier curves and pooled. A Bayesian random-effects model was used to combine direct and indirect evidence. RESULTS A total of 2058 articles were retrieved and screened, from which 45 studies assessing the efficacies of 8 different treatments in 11,364 patients were selected. The included studies had high methodological quality. Recurrence free survival* (progression/recurrence/relapse/disease/tumor-free survival were combined and redefined as RFS*) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were highest in MIS-treated patients (HR 0·57, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0·38-0·85; HR 0.48,95% CI 0.36-0.64, respectively), followed by SR-treated patients (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.74; HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.72, respectively). TACE was highly efficacious (58.9%) at decreasing the rates of major complications. Similar findings were obtained through sensitivity analysis, and in most of the prognostic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS MIS and SR exhibited the highest clinical efficacies, however, they were associated with higher rates of complications. Ablation is effective in small tumors, whereas SBRT is a relatively promising treatment option for SHCC. More well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be performed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sha Yang
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Stem Cell Therapy, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
- Children S Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Huapeng Lin
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianning Song
- Department of General Surgery, Guiqian International General Hospital, 1 Dongfeng Dadao, Wudang District, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550018, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Z, Yu Q, Lu X, Liu Y, Ji B. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2021; 16:455-471. [PMID: 34691297 PMCID: PMC8512513 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Radiofrequency ablation is a relatively novel treatment that may improve the treatment of HCC. AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the treatment of HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched for relevant published studies in English (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE) and in Chinese (CBM, CNKI and Wanfang) from their inception until September 23, 2019. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS A total of 19 retrospective studies including 2038 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that LLR was superior to RFA in terms of 3-year overall survival rate (OR = 0.62), 1 to 3-year disease-free survival rates (OR = 0.57; OR = 0.41, respectively) and local recurrence rates (OR = 2.71). CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis demonstrates that laparoscopic liver resection should be preferred in tumors of size 3-5 cm, while for < 3 cm the long term results are equal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhijun Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qiong Yu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xiaozheng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yahui Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Bai Ji
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shin SW, Ahn KS, Kim SW, Kim TS, Kim YH, Kang KJ. Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 273:656-666. [PMID: 33074898 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the oncologic outcomes of liver resection (LR) and local ablation therapies for HCC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although several studies have compared LR and local ablation therapies, the optimal treatment of choice for HCC within the Milan criteria remains controversial. METHODS We systemically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) and matched nonrandomized trials (NRTs) that compared LR and local ablation therapies for HCC within the Milan criteria. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were recurrence free survival (RFS) and recurrence pattern. RESULTS A total of 7 RCTs and 18 matched NRTs, involving 2865 patients in the LR group and 2764 patients in the local ablation therapy group [RFA, MWA, RFA plus trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)], were included. Although there was no significant difference in OS between LR and RFA, LR showed a significantly better 5-year RFS than RFA in the analysis of RCTs (hazards ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.92; P = 0.006). The RFA group showed a significantly higher local recurrence than the LR group in both analyses of RCTs and NRTs. Additionally, the LR group showed better OS and RFS than the MWA or RFA plus TACE groups. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis showed that LR was superior to RFA in terms of RFS and incidence of local recurrence. Moreover, LR showed better oncologic outcomes than MWA or RFA plus TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Wook Shin
- Department of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lu X, Li Z, Liu Y, Wang Z, Peng F, Yu Q, Fu X, Ji B. The Long-Term Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in East Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL 2020; 22. [DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.102876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Context: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths around the world. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) have been adopted for the treatment of HCC. The aim of the meta-analysis was to explore the long-term efficacy of RFA compared with LH for small HCC (sHCC) patients in the East Asian population. Evidence Acquisition: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by the literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Chinese Biological Medical Literature (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang from their inception until October 10, 2019, for comparing the long-term efficacy outcomes of RFA with LH. Results: Fourteen retrospective studies with 1,390 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the LH-treated group, RFA could raise the local recurrence rate under median follow-up duration and reduce disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 1 - 3 years. However, it failed to affect 5-year overall survival (OS) and DFS rates. In the subgroup analyses, different RFA approaches had significantly higher local recurrence rates than the LH group. A similar effect on OS and DFS rates within five years for single early (≤ 3 cm) HCCs and on the 1- and 5-year DFS rates for nodules ≤ 5 cm were observed between the two groups, but RFA approaches could reduce the 3-y OS and DFS rates for single nodules ≤ 5 cm. The percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) group had significantly lower 3- and 5-year OS and the 1- and 3-year DFS rates than the LH group, while no significant difference in OS and DFS rates in the laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) approach. The RFA approach improved the 3-year OS compared with the LH group in Japan, but reduced the 3-year OS and DFS rates within 3 years in China. Conclusions: Our results support that LH treating sHCC had a better long-term efficacy and a lower local recurrence rate than RFA in the East Asian population. Further high-quality prospective studies are required to confirm the long-term efficacy.
Collapse
|