Pathological Complete Response in Conversion Hepatectomy Induced by Lenvatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Role of liver resection in the era of advanced systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The recent dramatic progress in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides the possibility of a combination of surgery and systemic therapy including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or conversion settings. Since the turn of the century, at least three negative studies have tested adjuvant therapies after curative resection or ablation, including uracil-tegafur, which is an oral chemotherapeutic drug, sorafenib, and peretinoin, which a synthetic retinoid that may induce the apoptosis and differentiation of liver cancer cells. Using more potent immuno-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), at least 4 phase III trials of adjuvant immunotherapy are ongoing: nivolumab, durvalumab/ bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab+bevacizumab. Very recently, the last trial indicated a significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) for adjuvant atezolizumab+bevacizumab. Another promising combination of surgery and systemic therapy is neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable cases or a conversion strategy for oncologically unresectable cases. There are 2 neoadjuvant trials for technically or oncologically unresectable HCCs ongoing in Japan: the LENS-HCC trial using lenvatinib and the RACB study using atezolizumab+bevacizumab. A longer follow-up may be needed, but the overall survival (OS) in resected cases seems much higher than that in unresectable cases. Recently, the Japan Liver Cancer Association (JLCA) and the Japanese Society of HPB Surgery (JSHPBS) created a joint working group on "so-called borderline resectable HCC". They obtained a Japanese consensus on this issue that has been published on the websites of JLCA and JSHPBS. The definition of resectability or borderline resectability provides a common language regarding advanced HCC for investigators and is a useful tool for future clinical trials.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Histological findings of thyroid cancer after lenvatinib therapy

AIMS

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor used for treating unresectable or metastatic cancers, including thyroid cancer. As total thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine therapy is a commonly recommended initial treatment for thyroid cancer, histological findings of the thyroid after lenvatinib therapy remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse in-vivo changes in patients who underwent thyroidectomy after lenvatinib therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We screened 167 patients with thyroid cancer [papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), n = 102; follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), n = 26; anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), n = 39] who underwent lenvatinib therapy. Among these patients, six underwent thyroidectomy (lenvatinib-treated group: PTC, n = 3; FTC, n = 1; ATC, n = 2), and the specimens were examined. Five patients with PTC who did not receive lenvatinib therapy were included for comparison (untreated group). Microvessel density (MVD) was evaluated in both groups. The PTC and FTC specimens showed relatively more ischaemic changes than ATC specimens. Coagulative necrosis and ischaemic changes in cancer cells were frequently observed. ATC specimens showed fibrosis and mild cell damage. As hypothyroidism is a common side effect of lenvatinib therapy, non-cancerous thyroid tissues were also examined. Histological findings included mild lymphocytic infiltration, lymphoid follicular formation, histiocytic reaction and follicular epithelial destruction. The MVD in lenvatinib-treated tissues was significantly lower than that in untreated tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib therapy probably induces relatively specific ischaemic changes in thyroid cancer cells. Moreover, inflammatory cell infiltration and decreased MVD occur to varying degrees in non-cancerous thyroid tissue and may be related to hypothyroidism, a side effect of lenvatinib.

Conversion surgery after lenvatinib treatment for multiple lung metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma

Although systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma has advanced after the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib and lenvatinib, the effectiveness of a single tyrosine kinase inhibitor in survival extension of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is limited to a few months. Therefore, novel treatment options are required for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas, including those with multiple lung metastases. This case report describes a hepatocellular carcinoma patient with a recurrence of multiple lung metastases, which was successfully treated with conversion pneumonectomy after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A 79-year-old man underwent right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, along with removal of the tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava. Multiple lung metastases were detected 4 months after hepatectomy. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mainly lenvatinib, resulted in complete remission of the lung metastases, except for one lesion in segment 3 of the right lung which gradually enlarged. Twenty-three months after hepatectomy, partial resection of the right lung was performed using video-assisted thoracic surgery for this residual lesion in the right lung. The patient remained disease-free for 11 months after conversion pneumonectomy, without any adjuvant therapies. This is the first case report of multiple lung metastases originating from hepatocellular carcinoma which were successfully treated with conversion pneumonectomy after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversion pneumonectomy after systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable multiple lung metastases from hepatocellular carcinomas.

Clinical effectiveness of surgical treatment after lenvatinib administration for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence concerning survival after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have received lenvatinib treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether post-lenvatinib surgical treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma improves overall survival.

METHODS

The cohort of this retrospective study comprised 55 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone lenvatinib treatment. We classified them into two groups according to post-lenvatinib surgical treatment status and compared clinicopathologic factors and prognosis between the two groups with the aim of identifying predictors of overall survival.

RESULTS

The median duration of lenvatinib administration was 5.8 months (range, 0.4-24.0 months). Twelve of the 55 patients underwent surgery after receiving lenvatinib. There was no significant difference in assessed clinicopathological factors between patients who did and did not undergo surgery after being treated with lenvatinib. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.332; 95% confidence interval 1.062-5.168; P = 0.0369) and that surgery after treatment with lenvatinib achieved better overall survival than other forms of treatment (hazard ratio: 0.121; 95% confidence interval 0.016-0.901; P = 0.0393).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment after lenvatinib administration may be a useful therapeutic option for select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prognostic Advantages of Individual Additional Interventions After Lenvatinib Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently achieved salvage interventions after introduction of new biologic agents, while there are insufficient data to determine if such additional intervention(s) after treatment with newer biologic agents are truly advantageous for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

The clinical records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC were extensively reviewed and the prognostic advantages of individual additional treatments after lenvatinib treatment were investigated through a regression analysis considering time-dependent covariates.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection or curative-intent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.32), transarterial chemoembolization or transarterial infusion therapy (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81), and subsequent line of systemic therapy (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.63) were associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS), while R2 resection or palliative-intent RFA showed no correlation with DSS. The best response during lenvatinib therapy, nutritional status, plasma des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin level, a baseline CT enhancement pattern, and BCLC stage were also selected as independent predictors for DSS. Among the various treatments performed after lenvatinib therapy, R0 resection also showed clear prognostic advantage in both progression-free survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.58) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.39), suggesting that successful conversion to surgery may prolong survival outcomes through prolonged cancer-free interval in advanced HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional intervention(s)/treatment(s) after lenvatinib therapy for advanced HCC may have prognostic advantage in strictly selected populations. Successful conversion to curative resection may offer survival benefit with acceptable clinical outcomes.

Conversion surgery after preoperative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Optimal strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors, such as those with vascular tumor thrombus and those with extrahepatic metastases are unclear.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted focusing on conversion surgery for HCC after molecular targeted therapy and therapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

Upfront surgical resection of advanced HCC tumors has been challenged at some institutions because of lack of promising therapeutic options. Preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable HCC were developed to improve long-term outcome, but the results were not promising. Nonetheless, the recent advent of molecular targeted therapies and immune check-point inhibitors, enabling frequent tumor responses, has accelerated the use of conversion surgery after these therapies in patients with initially unresectable HCC. Increasing numbers of conversion surgeries after lenvatinib therapy has been reported, and the first prospective clinical trial assessing conversion surgery after lenvatinib therapy in initially unresectable HCC has been commenced. Furthermore, the superiority of combination therapy using atezolizumab and bevacizumab over sorafenib, a conventional first-line drug for unresectable HCC, in terms of overall survival and tumor response has been demonstrated, and the use of this regimen alongside conversion surgery is expected in addition to lenvatinib.

CONCLUSION

The literature demonstrated the feasibility of conversion surgery after systemic therapy. Further clinical investigation of surgery after systemic therapy for advanced HCC may be undertaken by clearly distinguishing the tumor status as technically unresectable or oncologically unresectable but technically resectable.

New treatment paradigm with systemic therapy in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Since the approval of sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 2007 (in 2009 in Japan), five more regimens have been approved: lenvatinib, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for first-line treatment, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab for second-line treatment, which are currently available for clinical use. The positive results of durvalumab, a programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody, plus tremelimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody, were also presented at the 2022 American Society Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium as superior to sorafenib in prolonging the overall survival; this combination is expected to be approved by the end of 2022. These systemic therapies are changing the treatment paradigm not only for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma but also for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. This review focuses on the role of systemic therapy in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of New Biologic Agents

With recent advances in systemic therapy, an increasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are expected to benefit from surgery. However, given the complex background of the disease and frequent presence of underlying liver injury, treatment of advanced HCC is complex and the treatment principle applied to colorectal liver metastases, for which conversion surgery has been actively performed, is often not applicable to patients with HCC. To maximize the survival outcomes of patients with HCC, optimization of each step of treatment through a multidisciplinary approach is inevitable. As initial treatment, systematic removal of tumor-bearing portal territory is associated with improved survival in patients with solitary HCC, and radiofrequency ablation is also effective for small, oligo HCCs. Although the high incidence of recurrence even after curative-intent treatment is a major concern in HCC, aggressive treatment for recurrence is important, because a prolonged cancer-free interval is associated with improved overall survival. For patients with advanced disease, recently introduced molecular-targeted agents may be effective for successful conversion to surgery in initially unresectable cases, although the overall response rate of HCC to systemic therapies remains unsatisfactory as compared to that of colorectal liver metastases. This report revisits the theoretical bases for management of HCC and discusses current strategies for maximizing survival of patients with advanced HCC.

Successful treatment with laparoscopic surgery and sequential multikinase inhibitor therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with massive portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and distant metastasis is considered unresectable. However, due to recent developments in systemic chemotherapy, successful cases of conversion therapy for unresectable diseases have been reported. Herein, we report a successful multidisciplinary approach for treatment of multi-visceral recurrence with sequential multikinase inhibitor and laparoscopic surgery.

CASE SUMMARY

A 63-year-old woman with chronic hepatitis B virus infection was diagnosed with HCC. Subsequently, she underwent two rounds of laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, laparoscopic left adrenalectomy, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for recurrence. Four years after initial hepatectomy, she presented with a 43-mm mass in the spleen and tumor thrombus involving the main portal vein trunk with ascites. Her liver function was Child-Pugh B (8), and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA II) levels were elevated up to 46.291 mAU/mL. Since initial treatment with regorafenib for three months was unsuccessful, the patient was administered lenvatinib. Ten months post-treatment, there was no contrast enhancement of PVTT or splenic metastasis. Chemotherapy was discontinued due to severe diarrhea. Afterward, splenic metastasis became viable, and PIVKA II increased. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was performed. She experienced no clinical recurrence 14 mo after resection.

CONCLUSION

Conversion surgery after successful multikinase inhibitor treatment might be considered an effective treatment option for advanced HCC.

A case of conversion hepatectomy for huge ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial embolization and lenvatinib therapy

We herein report a successfully treated case of huge ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by conversion hepatectomy after transarterial embolization (TAE) and lenvatinib therapy. A 33-year-old male patient with right hypochondralgia and liver tumor was referred to our hospital. He had a history of surgery for heart malformation. The tumor at the right lobe was 15 cm in diameter with bloody ascites. Right atrial thrombus 4.5 cm in diameter and marked cardiac dilatation were observed. TAE with ethanol suspended in lipiodol and gelatin sponge achieved hemostasis of the ruptured HCC. Although viable HCC remained after TAE, surgical treatment was abandoned because of abdominal wall invasion and his heart function. Lenvatinib and rivaroxaban were then initiated for HCC and atrial thrombus, respectively. Lenvatinib treatment resulted in a reduction in tumor marker levels and the tumor size. First, we planned conversion hepatectomy after 5 months of lenvatinib. However, recurrence of atrial thrombus prompted us to put off the surgery, and lenvatinib was re-administered. After improvement of atrial thrombus, we finally performed conversion hepatectomy 10 months after starting lenvatinib administration. The tumor was completely removed by combined resection of the diaphragm, and the patient has been doing well without any signs of recurrence.

Prognostic Impact of Surgical Intervention After Lenvatinib Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of new molecular-targeted agents, an increasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are benefiting from salvage interventions; however, the actual rate of conversion surgery and its prognostic advantages remain unclear.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 107 consecutive patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC were reviewed and the efficacy of additional therapy, including surgery, was investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 107 patients who were initially unsuitable for curative-intent therapy or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 54 (50.5%) received further therapy after lenvatinib treatment (surgery [n = 16] and TACE or other treatments [n = 38]). Of the 16 patients who received surgical intervention, R0 resection was achieved in 9 (8.4%) patients. Survival analysis confirmed that successful conversion to R0 resection was associated with a longer time to treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.29; p = 0.002) and better disease-specific survival (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.30; p = 0.002) compared with no additional treatment, while additional treatment other than surgery or R2 resection was associated with only a marginal or no prognostic advantage. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a decrease in plasma des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin levels compared with baseline levels (odds ratio 22.22, 95% CI 3.42-144.29; p = 0.001) was significantly correlated with successful R0 resection after lenvatinib treatment, irrespective of the tumor response as assessed by imaging analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with advanced HCC, conversion surgery after lenvatinib treatment may offer significant survival benefit as long as R0 resection is achieved.

Two hepatectomy cases for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after achieving a radiological complete response to sequential therapy with lenvatinib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

We herein report two cases of locally advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) that were resected after achieving a radiological complete response to initially administered lenvatinib followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE sequential therapy). A 78-year-old woman and an 80-year-old man with HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification stage C were treated for 15 and 14 months with lenvatinib, respectively. Both patients were subsequently treated with TACE, resulting in complete remission on imaging. The α-fetoprotein level in the woman and man decreased markedly from 9370 ng/ml to 46 ng/ml and from 6380 ng/ml to 3 ng/ml, respectively, leading to hepatectomy. A histopathological examination showed coagulative necrosis of the entire HCC in one case, while the other showed a small population of viable HCC cells. The results showed that LEN-TACE sequential therapy has a synergic effect and could be a promising option for locally advanced u-HCC.

Retrospective evaluation of the effect of Ninjin'yoeito in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

PURPOSES

Lenvatinib (LEN) is a molecular-target drug, used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is associated with adverse events (AEs), including hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, and anorexia, which may force dose reduction or discontinuation. Ninjin'yoeito (NYT) is a Chinese-Japanese herbal compound that can effectively treat fatigue and anorexia, and which has been used for chronic liver diseases. NYT reduces AEs and improves the liver function in patients treated with sorafenib but its effect on LEN is unclear.

METHODS

The present study included 46 patients (male, n = 32; female, n = 14) who received LEN for HCC at our hospital. Their median age was 70 years (range 36-88 years), and their median body weight was 61.5 kg (range 38.4-97.0 kg). Patients were divided into two groups, depending on whether they received NYT medication. Their AEs and liver function were examined one month after starting LEN.

RESULTS

The NYT group suffered less fatigue (63.6% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.0014) and showed elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels (45.5% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.0433) in comparison to the non-NYT group. The non-NYT group also showed a significantly exacerbated albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade (P = 0.0342) and ALBI score (average change: + 0.232, P = 0.0001) at 1 month in comparison to baseline.

CONCLUSION

NYT apparently suppressed LEN-induced fatigue and helped maintain liver function in patients with HCC.

Conversion hepatectomy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after right portal vein transection and lenvatinib therapy

Background

Lenvatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor that exhibits an antitumor effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An established strategy that involves surgery and usage of lenvatinib for advanced HCC remains elusive.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old male patient with advanced HCC and untreated hepatitis B was referred to our hospital. The tumor at the right lobe was 10 cm in diameter with right portal vein thrombus. Because of the possible lung metastasis and concern about the remaining hepatic function after extended right hepatectomy, lenvatinib was initiated before surgery. After the confirmation of a sharp decrease of tumor markers during the 3-week lenvatinib therapy, only a right portal vein transection was done leaving the enlargement of the left lobe for improved post-hepatectomy liver function while lenvatinib therapy was continued. The laparotomy revealed that the tumor was invading the right diaphragm. After 7 weeks of lenvatinib administration after right portal vein transection, an extended right hepatectomy with resection of the tumor-invaded diaphragm was successfully done. The lung nodules that were suspected as metastases had disappeared. The patient has been doing well without any sign of recurrence for 1 year.

Conclusion

The strategy involving the induction of lenvatinib to conversion hepatectomy including the portal vein transection was effective for advanced HCC.