Macro-TSH: A Diagnostic Challenge

MacroTSH: still a big problem for clinicians and clinical biochemists: lessons from a case report

MacroTSH still interferes with TSH assays. We present here a case report illustrating the difficulties that can arise in such conditions and attempt to discuss the steps involved in diagnosis.

Polyethylene glycol thyroid-stimulating hormone (PEG-TSH) testing in the management of pediatric thyroid dysfunction

PURPOSE

The polyethylene glycol (PEG) methodology is used for investigating incongruities in laboratory assays, such as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) measurements. The aim of the study is to investigate the practical application of PEG-TSH testing in cases of discrepancies between elevated TSH and normal free thyroxine (FT4) levels.

METHODS

A real-life observational study conducted in a tertiary medical center. The hospital's electronic database was queried for TSH tests performed in pediatric patients between 2015 and 2023. Of those, PEG-TSH were identified. Patients' clinical and biochemical characteristics and PEG-TSH-guided management were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 2949 TSH tests were performed in 891 children and adolescents for various indications. Among them were 61 (2.1%) PEG-TSH results, mean age 7.1 ± 5.3 years, of 38 patients (4.3%), comprised of 16 with congenital hypothyroidism, 16 with subclinical hypothyroidism, and 6 with Hashimoto thyroiditis. Both the TSH and the PEG-TSH levels of patients with congenital hypothyroidism were higher than those of the other two groups (P = 0.021 and P = 0.009, respectively), with no group differences in FT4 levels. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong association between TSH and PEG-TSH levels: r = 0.871, P < 0.001. In nearly one-half of the cases, clinical decisions made by clinicians (decreasing the dose or not initiating L-thyroxine treatment) were affected by the PEG-TSH results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support PEG-TSH testing for determining appropriate TSH levels and avoid unnecessary thyroid hormone treatment among children and adolescents. We propose the suitability of managing their clinical condition based upon age-appropriate clinical parameters and FT4 levels when their PEG-TSH levels are within the normal range.

Age-related variation in thyroid function - a narrative review highlighting important implications for research and clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Thyroid hormones are key determinants of health and well-being. Normal thyroid function is defined according to the standard 95% confidence interval of the disease-free population. Such standard laboratory reference intervals are widely applied in research and clinical practice, irrespective of age. However, thyroid hormones vary with age and current reference intervals may not be appropriate across all age groups. In this review, we summarize the recent literature on age-related variation in thyroid function and discuss important implications of such variation for research and clinical practice.

MAIN TEXT

There is now substantial evidence that normal thyroid status changes with age throughout the course of life. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations are higher at the extremes of life and show a U-shaped longitudinal trend in iodine sufficient Caucasian populations. Free triiodothyronine (FT3) levels fall with age and appear to play a role in pubertal development, during which it shows a strong relationship with fat mass. Furthermore, the aging process exerts differential effects on the health consequences of thyroid hormone variations. Older individuals with declining thyroid function appear to have survival advantages compared to individuals with normal or high-normal thyroid function. In contrast younger or middle-aged individuals with low-normal thyroid function suffer an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes while those with high-normal function have adverse bone outcomes including osteoporosis and fractures.

CONCLUSION

Thyroid hormone reference intervals have differential effects across age groups. Current reference ranges could potentially lead to inappropriate treatment in older individuals but on the other hand could result in missed opportunities for risk factor modification in the younger and middle-aged groups. Further studies are now needed to determine the validity of age-appropriate reference intervals and to understand the impact of thyroid hormone variations in younger individuals.