High-Risk Comorbidity Influences Prognosis in Early Gastric Cancer after Noncurative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Study

Long-term outcomes of additional surgery vs. observation after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and application value of the eCura scoring system: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for treating early gastric cancer (EGC). Noncurative ESD often necessitates additional surgical intervention because of the high risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), but the optimal post-ESD management remains controversial.

METHODS

This study collected data from patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ESD at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between January 2014 and December 2021. Patients were divided into surgical and observation groups and stratified by eCura scores into low (0-1), intermediate (2-4), and high-risk (5-7) categories. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the eCura score's ability to predict LNM. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Among the 260 patients, 91 were included in each group. No significant differences in OS or DSS were observed between the groups overall or among low-risk and intermediate-risk patients. However, high-risk patients in the surgical group had significantly better 5-year OS rates than those in the observation group, whereas the difference in DSS was not statistically significant. The eCura score exhibited strong predictive accuracy for LNM (area under the curve, 0.835; sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 92%). The subgroup analysis suggested that postchemoradiotherapy and total gastrectomy might be associated with better prognosis, although the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The eCura scoring system seems to be a valuable tool for guiding post-ESD management. Treatment decisions should be based on the individual characteristics and clinical factors of each patient. For carefully selected patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery, ESD may be a viable alternative treatment option.

Modified Charlson comorbidity index of long-term, non-gastric cancer mortality in patients with early gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

In patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic curability (eCura) C-2, the risk of non-gastric cancer mortality should be evaluated before receiving further gastrectomy. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is often used to estimate prognosis based on patient's background before treatment. We identified the long-term risk of mortality from other causes associated with comorbidities in CCI and applied it to the creation of EGC specific CCI (GCCI).

METHODS

A total of 1810 patients with EGC from 3 centers were included from January 2015 to February 2023. We used Cox proportional risk models to determine the risk of non-gastric cancer mortality related to comorbidities and used these hazard ratios to reweight the Charlson index to establish GCCI.

RESULTS

The Cox model suggested that moderate to severe liver disease, metastatic solid tumors, severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and leukemia had the highest risk of non-gastric cancer mortality [hazard ratio (HR) > 5)]. Survival analysis showed that the 5-year non-gastric cancer mortality rates in low-risk group (GCCI score 0-1), medium-risk group (GCCI score 2-4), and high-risk group (GCCI score 5-13) were 3%, 10%, and 52%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GCCI could identify patients with EGC who have higher non-gastric cancer mortality. The GCCI could be used to help patients with EGC make medical decisions.

The impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a prognostic factor in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have proven to be valuable tools in predicting prognosis based on comorbidities and nutritional status in the context of surgical procedures and endoscopic resections. The age-Adjusted CCI (ACCI) has also shown utility in surgical settings, but its application to early gastric cancer (EGC) remains unexplored. Consequently, we aimed at clarifying the prognostic factors for EGC treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ESD for EGC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from January 2015 to February 2023 were included. The overall survival (OS) and prognostic predictive ability were evaluated based on patients and lesion characteristics.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 50 months, 15 patients died, but none from the gastric cancer. The 5-year survival rate was 90.0%. In univariate and multivariate analyses, a high ACCI (>4.5) was the only significant prognostic factor (Hazard ratio, 27.78; 95% confidence interval, 3.62-213.40; p < 0.01). The 5-year survival rates for patients with low ACCI (<4.5) and high ACCI were 98.9% and 72.9%, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A high ACCI is a significant prognostic indicator for 5-year survival and the risk of mortality caused by other comorbidities. EGC suitable for ESD is unlikely to serve as a prognostic factor, and ACCI should be considered as an important reference when considering additional surgical procedures in high-ACCI patients after ESD with endoscopic curability (eCura) C-2 for EGC.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Management Strategy of Non-curative ESD in Gastric Cancer: Curative Criteria, and the Critical Building Block for Determining Beyond It

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed in cases of early gastric cancer, where the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is expected to be negligible, and 12%-21% of these patients are deemed to have undergone non-curative resections based on pathological criteria. In such cases, decisions regarding additional treatments must be made to maximize curability, depending on the anticipated LNM risk. Well-established risk factors for LNM include lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, deep submucosal invasion, positive vertical margins, and larger tumor size. When pathological factors associated with a clear LNM risk, such as lymphatic or deep submucosal invasion, are present, additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection should be considered. Conversely, in cases involving only a positive horizontal margin, additional endoscopic treatment may be an effective therapeutic option as opposed to gastrectomy because of the negligible risk of LNM despite the potential risk of residual tumors. Endoscopic resection is particularly advantageous for determining complete resection. In addition to pathological curability, patient-specific factors, such as age and comorbidities, must be considered. Several retrospective cohort studies have shown that the cause of mortality among patients placed only on observation without additional treatment after non-curative resection is generally related to underlying conditions irrelevant to gastric cancer. Thus, it is crucial to assess both GC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality to finalize treatment decisions that help minimize such mortality. Therefore, new treatment algorithms that integrate pathological curability with patient-specific factors must be developed.

Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors in older patients and predictors of mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 207 lesions in 195 consecutive older patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors between January 2007 and December 2018. Outcomes of ESD were evaluated, and the prognosis was assessed in terms of both curability and the patient's baseline physical condition as determined by several indices. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reduced overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Treatment outcomes included a median procedure time of 55 min, en bloc resection rate of 97%, histological en bloc resection rate of 92%, postoperative bleeding rate of 2.4%, and intraoperative perforation rate of 3.4%. Postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation could be treated conservatively. Delayed perforation occurred in one patient and required emergency surgery. Three-year OS was 99.4% and 5-year OS was 95.8%. Overall, three patients experienced recurrence (one local, two distant metastasis), and one patient died of primary cancer. Multivariate analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥ 3 as the only independent predictor of reduced OS (hazard ratio 4.26; 95% confidence interval 1.60-11.38; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that colorectal ESD is safe and effective in older patients aged ≥ 75 years. There was a significant independent association of reduced OS with high CCI score, but not with curability by ESD. The CCI score should be considered when determining the indications for ESD in older patients.

System analysis based on T-cell exhaustion-related genes identifies PTPRT as a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer

Multiple investigations have demonstrated the crucial involvement of T-cell exhaustion (TEX) in anti-tumor immune response and their strong correlation with prognosis. This study aimed at creating a strong signature using TEX for gastric cancer through bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. We utilized data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases to retrieve RNA-seq data from patients with stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). Genes related to TEX were discovered using gene set variance analysis (GSVA) and weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA). Subsequently, prognostic signature based on TEX was developed using LASSO-Cox analysis. Relationship between key genes and immune cells were examined. Finally, biological function of a key TEX-related gene PTPRT in gastric cancer was verified by in vivo experiment. A total of 29 TEX-related biomarkers were screened by WGCNA and random forest. Among them, five core signatures (PTPRT, CAV2, PPIH, PRDM2, and FGF1), further identified by LASSO-Cox, were considered as strong predictors of prognosis for gastric cancer and associated with immune infiltration. PTPRT gene had the largest number of SNPs, with the most mutation types. In vivo experiments revealed that PTPRT overexpression significantly inhibited tumor malignant progression and accelerated apoptosis through stimulating the secretion of killer cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ. In addition, flow cytometry revealed that PTPRT overexpression alleviated TEX by increasing the abundance of CD8+ T cells, with inhibition of cell surface PD-1 and Tim-3. The predictive prognostic value of TEX gene expression levels was evaluated in patients with gastric cancer, providing a new perspective for precision immuno-oncology studies.

Decision to perform additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer based on the risk of lymph node metastasis: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Radical surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) may be excessive, since only 5-10% of patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study investigated the suitability of the eCura system for determining the need for radical surgery after non-curative ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 343 patients who underwent non-curative ESD for EGC from 2006 to 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Korea. These patients were divided into surgery (n = 191) and observation (n = 152) groups based on whether they underwent additional surgery post-ESD. Each group was further classified into low-risk (eCura score 0-1), intermediate-risk (eCura score 2-4) and high-risk (eCura score 5-7). All patients were regularly followed-up at least annually after the initial treatment. The cumulative overall and recurrence-free survival rates were calculated for each category and compared between the surgery and observation groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences in overall survival were found between the surgery and observation groups in low-risk (p = 0.168) and intermediate-risk patients (p = 0.306); however, high-risk patients had better 5-year overall survival rate in the surgery group than in the follow-up group (95.2% vs. 71.4%, p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was higher in the surgery group than in the observation group for low-risk (100% vs. 84.3%; p = 0.034), intermediate-risk (96.1% vs. 88.4%; p = 0.081) and high-risk patients (100% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up without additional surgery after non-curative ESD can be a reasonable option for low-risk and even intermediate-risk patients according to the eCura system. However, surgery is warranted for eCura high-risk patients.

Prediction model of 3-year survival after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients aged ≥ 85 years: EGC-2 model

PURPOSE

Little is known about the prognostic factors for survival after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in elderly patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study is to determine prognostic factors and a prediction model of 3-year survival after ESD for EGC in patients aged ≥ 85 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 740 patients with EGC aged ≥ 85 years, who were treated by ESD at 30 institutions in Japan. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prediction models for 3-year OS after ESD were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model based on Uno's C-statistics.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 309 patients died of any cause and 10 patients died of gastric cancer. OS and DSS after 3 years were 82.7% and 99.2%, respectively. No significant differences in OS were found among curability categories. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) to be predictors of 3-year survival. We established a final model (EGC-2 model) expressed by GNRI - (2.2×CCI) with a cutoff value of 96. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the model value < 96 group than in the model value ≥ 96 group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model using GNRI and CCI will be useful to support decision-making for the treatment of EGC in elderly patients aged ≥ 85 years.

Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection is increasingly used in the treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, about 15% of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases report non-curative resection. The efficacy of different remedial interventions after non-curative ESD for EGC remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of additional surgery and non-gastrectomy treatment for EGC patients who underwent non-curative ESD.

METHODS

All relevant studies published up to October 2021 were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The medical subject headings terms "early gastric cancer," "gastrectomy," "endoscopic submucosal dissection," and their related free keywords were used to search relevant articles without restrictions on regions, publication types, or languages. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of OS were calculated using a random- or fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 17 retrospective cohort studies with 5880 patients, of whom 3167 underwent additional surgery and 2713 underwent non-gastrectomy. We found that patients receiving additional gastrectomy had better 5-year OS (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 3.05-4.31), DSS (OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.22-4.66), and DFS (OR = 4.39, 95% CI = 1.78-10.82) outcomes than those receiving non-gastrectomy treatments. The pooled HR also showed that gastrectomy following non-curative ESD significantly improved OS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33-0.48). In addition, elderly patients benefited from additional surgery in consideration of the 5-year OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41-0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-gastrectomy treatments, additional surgery offered better long-term survival outcomes for patients with EGC who underwent non-curative ESD.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Prognostic factors in the treatment of gastric mucosal atypical hyperplasia by endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is becoming increasingly popular as a treatment for precancerous lesions and early cancers of the stomach. However, there have been few studies on the factors associated with the recurrence of precancerous lesions after ESD.

Methods

To investigate the prognostic factors of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia, we retrospectively analyzed 115 patients who were treated with ESD between February 2018 and January 2020. Chi-square test and Fisher’s extract test were used to select factors for further investigation, and prognostic analysis was carried out with the Kaplan–Meier method and a Cox regression model.

Results

Platelet counts (P = 0.027) and albumin levels (P = 0.011) were both lower in patients with recurrence than in patients without recurrence of gastric mucosal atypical hyperplasia after ESD.

Conclusions

This study reveals that low platelet counts and albumin levels were probably unfavorable prognostic factors in mucosal atypical hyperplasia of the stomach.