Effects of Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration

Process improvement in thyroid fine needle aspiration: Standardizing number of smears for enhanced adequacy and diagnosis

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a safe, cost-effective diagnostic procedure used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. The number of thyroid FNAs has dramatically increased over the past few years. In the absence of standardized procedures regarding the number of needle passes needed for diagnosis and the lack of clarity on the use of conventional smears (CS) versus liquid-based preparations (LBP), the demand of thyroid FNAs has led to increased workload on cytology laboratories, which can negatively affect patient safety. We implemented a standardized two needle passes for CS and collection of all needle rinses and additional pass material in CytoRich Red for ThinPrep LBP and compared the non-diagnostic and diagnostic rates before and after this intervention. There were 290 pre-intervention cases and 348 post-intervention cases; of which, there were 17 (5.9%) non-diagnostic cases of the pre-intervention group and 27 (7.8) non-diagnostic cases of the post-intervention group. There was no statistically significant difference in non-diagnostic and diagnostic rates before and after the change (p = 0.347 by two-tailed Z test).

Diagnostic significance of clay-like materials aspirated from thyroid nodules

Objective

The simplest way to determine the adequacy of aspirated materials is the on-site gross visual assessment of aspirated materials. However, few studies have examined the gross findings of thyroid aspirates. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic significance of clay-like material aspirated from thyroid nodules.

Material and Methods

We reviewed 69,848 thyroid nodules that underwent aspiration cytology at Kuma Hospital between January 2007 and August 2021. Among them, 355 (0.5%) nodules with aspirated materials described as clay-like materials were retrospectively examined.

Results

Among 355 nodules, 322 (90.7%) were categorized as cystic fluid or benign. The aspirated materials were mainly composed of non-epithelial components, including colloid or proteinaceous materials, foamy histiocytes, and degenerative red blood cells. In original ultrasound reports, the incidence of intermediate and high suspicion was 11.0%. Malignant cells were observed in 21 nodules (5.9%), one-third of which were papillary thyroid carcinomas. The materials aspirated from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas exhibited necrotic carcinoma cells derived from infarcted areas. The overall risk of malignancy was 3.9%. The risk of malignancy in nodules interpreted as highly suspicious on ultrasound examination was 37.5%.

Conclusion

As clay-like materials aspirated from thyroid nodules were considered sufficient specimens, the recognition contributes to avoiding unnecessary second punctures. The presence of clay-like materials was indicative of the colloid and/or blood components of benign cystic lesions, or, more rarely, of infarcted carcinoma. The ultrasound examination results tended to overestimate nodules. We should reaffirm that on-site gross visual assessment of aspirated materials is a fast and reasonably accurate predictor of the on-site adequacy of the samples.

Assessing Adequacy: A Meta-Analysis of Rapid Onsite Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the standard form of preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodule cytological status. A significant number FNAs are classified as inadequate for interpretation, requiring a repeat FNA which is potentially avoidable, costly, and delays treatment. To address these concerns and maximize first-time FNA adequacy, rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of FNA specimens was introduced. Our study aims to determine the impact of ROSE on FNA adequacy.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for primary articles assessing the adequacy of ROSE in thyroid nodules.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included for a total of 24,649 thyroid nodes. Thirteen thousand two hundred fifteen (53.6%) thyroid nodules were assessed utilizing ROSE and 11,434 (46.4%) were not. Pooled adequacy increased significantly from 76% without ROSE to 92% with rose (P = 0.001). Use of ROSE increased the odds of adequate FNA by 22% (risk ratio (RR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-1.32). At institutions with less than 85% effective diagnostic adequacy without ROSE, the risk for diagnostic adequacy increased by 28% with ROSE implementation (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.20-1.37). In contrast, in studies reported from institutions with an effective diagnostic rate greater than 85% without the use of ROSE, the diagnostic adequacy only increased by 5% with ROSE implementation (RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ROSE during first-time FNA of thyroid nodules can significantly improve adequacy, especially at institutions with baseline high inadequacy rates. Implementation of ROSE can reduce repeat FNAs and its associated consequences.

Combined fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the same setting: A two-years' experience

INTRODUCTION

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and ancillary techniques is an accurate diagnostic tool for many pathologies. However, in some cases, it may not be sufficient for actionable diagnoses or molecular testing, especially for cases that require large immunohistochemical panels or cases in which histological features are mandatory for the diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB), on the contrary, provides samples that are suitable for histological features and sufficient for all ancillary studies. However, CNB is often performed by radiologists or clinicians without the direct participation of cytopathologists, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnoses. This study reports on the experience of combining FNAC and CNB performed in one setting by cytopathologists. The aim was to evaluate the impact of CNB on FNAC and the diagnostic efficiency of the combined procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-two FNAC and CNB procedures performed in the same setting over a period of 2 years were analysed. The FNAC diagnoses were compared and integrated with the subsequent CNB diagnoses. The impact of CNB was categorized as follows: non-contributory, in cases of inadequate samples; confirmed, when the CNB and FNAC diagnoses were the same; improved, when the CNB diagnosis was consistent with the FNAC diagnosis and further specified the corresponding entity; allowed, when CNB produced a diagnosis that could not be reached by FNAC; changed, when the CNB changed the previous FNAC diagnosis.

RESULTS

CNB confirmed the FNAC diagnosis in 40.1% of cases (n = 57/142). CNB improved the FNAC diagnosis in 47.2% of cases (n = 67/142). CNB allowed a diagnosis that could not be performed on FNAC in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB changed a previous FNAC diagnosis in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB was non-contributory in 8.4% of cases (n = 12/142). CNB produced a positive impact on the whole diagnostic procedure in 51.4% of total cases (n = 73/142). The combined FNAC and CNB resulted in actionable diagnoses in 91.5% of all cases (n = 130/142). A complete molecular assessment was successfully performed in 14.7% of cases (n = 21/142) utilizing either FNAC or CNB material.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of FNAC and CNB in one setting improves the diagnostic accuracy of both procedures. This approach exploits the advantages of each procedure, enhancing the accuracy of the final diagnosis.

The Driver Role of Pathologists in Endocrine Oncology: What Clinicians Seek in Pathology Reports

Endocrine neoplasia represents an increasingly broad spectrum of disorders. Endocrine neoplasms range from incidental findings to potentially lethal malignancies. In this paper, we cover the impact of pathology in the interpretation of the clinic-pathological, genetic, and radiographic features underpinning these neoplasms. We highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary interactions in structuring a rational diagnostic and efficient therapeutic plan and emphasize the role of histopathological input in decision-making. In this context, standardized pathology reporting and second opinion endocrine pathology review represent relevant tools to improve the overall diagnostic workup of patients affected by endocrine tumors in every specific scenario. In fact, although a relevant proportion of cases may be correctly identified based on clinical presentation and biochemical/imaging investigations, a subset of cases presents with atypical findings that may lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan based on a wrong pathological diagnosis if all pieces of the puzzle are not correctly considered. Pathologists have a responsibility to actively guide clinicians before and during surgical procedures to prevent unnecessary interventions. In all areas of endocrine pathology, pathologists must understand the complexity of tissue preservation and assay sensitivities and specificities to ensure the optimal quality and interpretation of diagnostic material. Finally, pathologists are central actors in tumor tissue biobanking, which is an expanding field in oncology that should be promoted while adhering to strict ethical and methodological standards.

Performance of ACR TI-RADS and the Bethesda System in Predicting Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules at a Large Children's Hospital and a Comprehensive Review of the Pediatric Literature

While thyroid nodules are less common in children than in adults, they are more frequently malignant. However, pediatric data are scarce regarding the performance characteristics of imaging and cytopathology classification systems validated to predict the risk of malignancy (ROM) in adults and select those patients who require fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and possibly surgical resection. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients 18 years of age or younger who underwent thyroid FNA at our institution from 1 July 2015 to 31 May 2022. Based on surgical follow-up from 74 of the 208 FNA cases, we determined the ROM for the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification system and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and added our results to those of pediatric cohorts from other institutions already published in the literature. We found the following ROMs for 1458 cases using ACR TI-RADS (TR): TR1. Benign: 2.2%, TR2. Not Suspicious: 9.3%, TR3. Mildly Suspicious: 16.6%, TR4. Moderately Suspicious: 27.0%, and TR5. Highly Suspicious 76.5%; and for 5911 cases using the Bethesda system: Bethesda I. Unsatisfactory: 16.8%, Bethesda II. Benign: 7.2%, Bethesda III: Atypia of Undetermined Significance: 29.6%, Bethesda IV. Follicular Neoplasm: 42.3%, Bethesda V. Suspicious for Malignancy: 90.8%, and Bethesda VI. Malignant: 98.8%. We conclude that ACR TI-RADS levels imply higher ROMs for the pediatric population than the corresponding suggested ROMs for adults, and, in order to avoid missing malignancies, we should consider modifying or altogether abandoning size cutoffs for recommending FNA in children and adolescents whose thyroid glands are smaller than those of adults. The Bethesda categories also imply higher ROMs for pediatric patients compared to adults.

Validation of a Cytological Classification System for the Rapid On-Site Evaluation (Rose) of Pulmonary and Mediastinal Needle Aspirates

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a procedure that allows immediate assessment of adequacy of cytological specimens obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA). The application of ROSE diagnostic categories has been applied in various organs, but not in thoracic pathology. We aimed to retrospectively assess the concordance with the final diagnosis of a categorization from C1 (inadequate) to C5 (neoplastic) during ROSE performed with bronchoscopic or percutaneous sampling procedures of thoracic lesions in a large series of consecutive cases. This retrospective single-center study evaluated 2282 consecutive ROSEs performed on 1827 patients from January 2016 to December 2020 in 994 cases of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in peripheral pulmonary lesions, in 898 transthoracic FNAs, in 318 ultrasound-guided TBNAs, in 50 conventional TBNAs and in 22 endobronchial TBNAs. False positive and false negative cases of ROSE were 43 (1.88%) and 73 (3.2%), respectively, when compared with the definitive diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive and negative prognostic values of ROSE were 94.84%, 95.05%, 96.89% and 91.87%, respectively. Overall concordance between ROSE and the final diagnosis was 0.8960 (Cohen's kappa). No significant differences were observed in terms of sampling procedures and type and location of the lesions. A tiered classification scheme of ROSE from C1 to C5 during bronchoscopic and percutaneous sampling procedures is helpful in effectively guiding clinical management of patients with thoracic lesions.