Preoperative Anxiety and Its Influence on Patient and Surgeon Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Dental Implant Surgeries Performed Under Intravenous Conscious Sedation

Dental treatments under sedation-analgesia in patients who are unable to collaborate: a prospective observational study

Background

Excessive fear of dental procedures leads to disruptive behavior during dental examinations and treatments. Dental examinations and treatments of these patients usually require additional techniques, such as sedation. The most commonly used techniques are inhalation of nitrous oxide, infusion of propofol with fentanyl, and premedication and infusion of midazolam.

Methods

A prospective observational epidemiological study was conducted on patients who required sedoanalgesia techniques for dental exploration and procedures. The reasons for the inability of patients to cooperate (excessive fear or intellectual disability), age, sex, weight, systemic pathology, oral pathology, treatment performed, time of intervention, anesthetic technique performed, and occurrence of complications were recorded.

Results

In total, 218 patients were studied. Sixty-five patients came for fear of dental treatment and 153 for presenting with a diagnosis of intellectual disability and not collaborating in the treatment with local anesthesia. The average age of all patients was 30.54 ± 17.30 years. The most frequent oral pathologies found in patients with excessive fear were tartar (6.8%) and wisdom teeth (6.4%), followed by missing teeth (5%). In patients with disabilities, a combination of tartar and cavities appeared most frequently (41.3%), followed by cavities (15.6%). The most frequently used sedoanalgesia technique was the infusion of propofol with fentanyl in both groups of patients, followed by nitrous oxide.

Conclusion

The combination of propofol and fentanyl was the most frequently used alternative in patients who were unable to collaborate because of intellectual disability or carry out longer or more complex treatments. Inhaled nitrous oxide and midazolam were the sedative techniques of choice for simpler oral treatments, such as tartrectomies, shallow obturations, and shorter interventions, or in younger patients.

Efficacy and cost analysis of intravenous conscious sedation for long oral surgery procedures

The aim of this study was to determine what is considered a long oral surgery and conduct a cost-effective analysis of sedative agents used for intravenous sedation (IVS) and sedation protocols for such procedures. Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were used to identify human studies employing IVS for extractions and implant-related surgeries, between 2003 and July/2023. Sedation protocols and procedure lengths were documented. Sedative satisfaction, operator satisfaction, and sedation assessment were also recorded. Cost estimation was based on The British National Formulary (BNF). To assess bias, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools were employed. This review identified 29 randomised control trials (RCT), six cohorts, 14 case-series, and one case-control study. The study defined long procedures with an average duration of 31.33 minutes for extractions and 79.37 minutes for implant-related surgeries. Sedative agents identified were midazolam, dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remimazolam. Cost analysis revealed midazolam as the most cost-effective option (<10 pence per procedure per patient) and propofol the most expensive option (approximately £46.39). Bias analysis indicated varying degrees of bias in the included studies. Due to diverse outcome reporting, a comparative network approach was employed and revealed benefits of using dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remimazolam over midazolam. Midazolam, dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remimazolam demonstrated safety and efficacy as sedative agents for conscious IVS in extended procedures like extractions or implant-related surgeries. While midazolam is the most cost-effective option, dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remimazolam offer subjective and clinical benefits. The relatively higher cost of propofol may impede its widespread use. Dexmedetomidine and remimazolam stand out as closely priced options, necessitating further clinical investigations for comparative efficacy assessment.

Changes of dental anxiety, aesthetic perception and oral health-related quality of life related to influencing factors of patients' demographics after anterior implant treatment: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence has revealed the effects of anterior implant procedures on dental anxiety (DA), aesthetic perception and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, few reported the changes and influencing factors of the above outcomes before and after anterior implant treatment. This study was to evaluate the changes of DA, aesthetic perception and OHRQoL related to influencing factors of patients' demographics after anterior implant treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were prospectively recruited before surgery. The subjects completed the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OSE) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), before implant surgery and after definitive prosthesis placement. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test by Bonferroni correction were applied for the data analysis and the influencing factors evaluation (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Overall, 39 patients (mean age of 44.9 ± 12.0) completed the three scales. After anterior implant treatment, MDAS was not significantly changed (p > 0.05). The overall OSE (p < 0.001) and OHIP-14 (p < 0.05) were significantly improved. Females showed more improvement of overall OHIP score than males after anterior implant treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior implant procedures did not change the level of patient's DA, while aesthetic perception and OHRQoL were enhanced. Only gender difference of overall OHIP change was found in our study. Thus, more related influencing factors with larger sample and long-term effective follow-up are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05424458. Registered 13 June 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05424458 .

Considerations for Satisfactory Sedation during Dental Implant Surgery

Implant surgery is a lengthy dental procedure, and sedation is often used to reduce discomfort. The effectiveness of sedation has traditionally been evaluated in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction, but the most important goal is not to induce a deep sleep in the patient, but rather to ensure that the surgery is performed safely and as planned. Additionally, adequate pain control is a necessary requirement for patient and surgeon satisfaction. Most patients undergoing implant surgery are middle-aged or older, and a relatively large number of them have cardiovascular disease. Infiltration anesthesia using articaine or lidocaine in combination with adrenaline is widely used, but its use in patients with cardiovascular disease is limited because of adrenaline’s effects on the cardiovascular system. The use of long-acting local anesthetics and the potential efficacy of ultrasound-guided jaw nerve block have been investigated to enhance analgesia without resorting to adrenaline. Midazolam and propofol are usually used for sedation, but dexmedetomidine, which causes less respiratory depression, and the ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam are emerging as potential alternatives. Monitoring of anesthetic depth using electroencephalography is effective in maintaining a constant level of sedation. In addition, sedation promotes the stabilization of heart rate and blood pressure, reducing the risks associated with adrenaline and allowing for safer management.

Poor Correlation of Provider and Patient Satisfaction with Anesthesia in Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial

Purpose

This secondary analysis of a clinical trial that measured surgeon, anesthesiologist, and patient satisfaction following ophthalmic surgery under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with a benzodiazepine investigates the degree of association between patient satisfaction with anesthesia compared to surgeon and anesthesiologist satisfaction with anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

Data from analogous 6-point surgeon satisfaction surveys and anesthesiologist satisfaction surveys were compared to data from a 6-point validated patient satisfaction survey collected from a clinical trial investigating satisfaction with different forms of benzodiazepine for patients undergoing cataract, retina, cornea, or glaucoma surgery. Relationships between measures were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, with further subgroup analysis based on language groups and single-question measures of satisfaction.

Results

A total of 283 ophthalmic surgical cases were analyzed. Mean surgeon satisfaction was 5.27 (range, 1.33–6.00), mean anesthesiologist satisfaction was 5.12 (range, 1.17–6.00), and mean patient satisfaction was 5.28 (range, 2.58–6.00). The correlation between surgeon and patient satisfaction was 0.333 (p = 9.06e-9), while the correlation between anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction was 0.319 (p = 4.28e-8). There was no difference between English and non-English speaking patients in correlation between surgeon and patient satisfaction (p = 0.08) and anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction (p = 0.47).

Conclusion

The data demonstrate a low level of association between patient satisfaction with anesthesia and provider satisfaction, even when patient language is taken into consideration. This suggests that providers are poor predictors of patient satisfaction with anesthesia and are unreliable judges of patient comfort perioperatively.

Preoperative oral pregabalin for anxiety control: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of preoperative oral pregabalin for anxiety control, the most effective dosage regimen, its impact on postoperative pain, and its adverse effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was conducted of PubMed/Medline and clinicaltrials.gov (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2009 and November 2018, with no language restriction. Based on PRISMA guidelines, the specific question was: is preoperative oral pregabalin effective and safe for anxiety control in patients undergoing surgery? The critical reading of retrieved studies followed questions prepared by the CASPe Network, and their methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad Scale.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials were selected for review. All twelve studies were trials of high quality. A dose of 75 mg preoperative oral pregabalin has been found to reduce anxiety and stabilize intraoperative hemodynamics, although a more significant improvement appears to be achieved with a single dose of 150 mg pregabalin at least 1 h before the surgery. It is not associated with any severe adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative administration of oral pregabalin in a single dose of 150 mg appears to be effective to significantly reduce the anxiety of patients, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and postoperative pain.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that pregabalin is useful and safe for preoperative and intraoperative anxiety control in patients undergoing surgery.

Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Midazolam with Nasal Spray for Conscious Sedation in Minor Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries

Aim:

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of nasal spray midazolam by collating it with conventional intravenous midazolam for conscious sedation in minor oral surgeries.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty patients were selected randomly and divided into two groups: group A for intranasal midazolam atomized spray (n = 30) and group B for intravenous midazolam (n = 30). Physiological parameters, anxiety score, sedation rating, patient’s cooperation score, and retrograde and anterograde amnesia were recorded for each patient during preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period. Final evaluation of safety and efficacy in the nasal and intravenous routes of midazolam drug during minor oral surgery was compared.

Results:

In this study, both intranasal and intravenous groups showed decrease in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure intraoperatively but within physiological limits and increase in the average pulse rates in both the groups. The average oxygen saturation levels were maintained to normal range in both the groups. The average respiratory rate decreased in both intranasal and intravenous groups during surgical procedure. The preoperative to postoperative anxiety scores were decreased significantly in the both groups and there was no significant difference in pre- to postoperative anxiety scores between the groups.

Conclusion:

Both intravenous and intranasal administration of midazolam showed better patient cooperation, satisfaction, and clinical effectiveness. Intranasal midazolam spray is effective in the reduction of subjective stress, reliable anxiolysis while preserving protective reflexes.

Takotsubo Syndrome After Surgical and Nonsurgical Oral and Maxillofacial Events: Review of Published Cases

PURPOSE

Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is an acute and potentially serious cardiac disorder that is often attributed to an exuberant catecholaminergic response to a severely physical or emotional event. As there is a paucity of information in the dental literature on TS, this article will provide an overview of this uncommon syndrome, including clinical presentation, demographic characteristics, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and recovery, particularly emphasizing its occurrence with oral and maxillofacial procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A PubMed search with the keyword "takotsubo" for publications from 1991 through May 2018 yielded 3,778 articles. Case reports and case series of TS associated with surgical and nonsurgical procedures in the oral and maxillofacial region were reviewed. Other cases were identified using a defined search strategy.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 28 documented episodes of TS that occurred with head and neck surgical procedures, mostly sinus, carotid, nasal, and cancer reconstruction surgical procedures, and notably, 3 cases occurred concurrently with dental extractions. In all of the featured patients, some degree of cardiovascular impairment developed and phenotypic overlap with acute occlusive coronary disease was shown. Most patients recovered within 2 weeks, and recovery in the remainder extended up to 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

On rare occasions, TS has been reported in association with oral and maxillofacial procedures. As stress appears to be a precipitating factor in the development of TS, perioperative efforts should be instituted to reduce an adrenergic cascade.