Critical analysis of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator arrhythmia detection : results and technical considerations

Effect of Novel Programming on Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Very Low Ejection Fraction (from A MADIT-RIT)

The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy showed a significant reduction in the risk of inappropriate therapy in patients with a programmed high-rate cutoff ≥200 beats per minute or delayed therapy for events ≥170 beats per minute compared with conventional programming. We aimed to characterize outcomes by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ranges for patients with high-rate, delayed, or conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. We assessed the effect of LVEF (LVEF <15%, LVEF 15% to 25%, LVEF >25%) on the risk of inappropriate conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and death in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy. Inappropriate therapies and death were independently evaluated by the adjudication committee. Statistical methods involved Kaplan-Meier time-to-event graphs and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The study involved 140 patients (9%) with LVEF 15%, 585 with LVEF 15% to 25% (39%), and 774 with LVEF >25% (52%). High-rate or delayed programming significantly reduced the risk of inappropriate therapy compared with conventional programming in patients with all LVEFs (p <0.001 for all LVEF). Patients with LVEF <15% had an exceptional 97% lower risk of inappropriate therapy, with high-rate programming than conventional programming (hazard ratio 0.028, p = 0.001), without an increase in mortality. High-rate and delayed programming is superior to conventional programming in all LVEF ranges, without adverse effects.

The efficacy of single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with atrial sensing dipole to detect atrial fibrillation and to reduce inappropriate therapy according to atrial sensing ON or OFF: Rationale and design of the SMART-CONTROL study, a prospective multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the efficacy of single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with atrial sensing dipole (VDD-ICD) and conventional single-chamber ICD from the aspect of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection or inappropriate ICD therapy reduction. In the SMART-CONTROL trial (NCT03932604), we primarily aim to investigate whether the atrial sensing capability of VDD-ICD is useful in AF detection and inappropriate therapy reduction by randomly activating or deactivating the atrial sensing function.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to enroll 640 patients with no history of clinical AF or rhythm control for AF within 1 year who were undergoing the implantation of VDD-ICD system. Patients are assigned randomly to atrial sensing "ON" or "OFF" group, with crossover allowed during follow-up. The coprimary outcomes are the incidence of AF detection and inappropriate ICD therapy over a 2-year follow-up period. The secondary outcomes include non-AF atrial tachyarrhythmia, ventricular tachyarrhythmia with or without ICD therapy, thromboembolic events, bleeding, heart failure hospitalization, mortality, a composite of adverse cardiovascular events, and long-term atrial sensing stability or variability.

CONCLUSION

We expect that this trial can evaluate the efficacy of a single-lead ICD system on various clinical outcomes including AF detection and inappropriate therapy reduction, and ultimately provide guidance to selection of ICD system.

Single-brand dual-chamber discriminators to prevent inappropriate shocks in patients implanted with prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a propensity-weighted comparison of single- and dual-chamber devices

PURPOSE

Comparisons of the efficacy of dual- vs. single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in preventing inappropriate shocks have had contradictory results. We investigated whether dual-chamber devices have a lower risk of inappropriate shocks and the specific role of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators.

METHODS

All heart failure (HF) patients without an indication for pacing and implanted with a prophylactic ICD were recruited from the nationwide multicenter UMBRELLA registry. Arrhythmic events were collected by remote monitoring and reviewed by a committee of experts.

RESULTS

Among 782 patients, single-chamber ICDs were implanted in 537 (68.7%) and dual-chamber devices in 245 (31.3%). During a mean follow-up of 52.2 ± 24.5 months, 109 inappropriate shocks were delivered in 49 patients (6.2%). In the propensity-score-matched analysis, dual-chamber ICDs were related to lower rates of inappropriate shocks as compared to single-chamber devices (0.9% vs. 11.8%, p = < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariable Cox proportional analysis, independent predictors of inappropriate shock were history of atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78, CI 1.37-5.64, p = 0.004), chronic kidney disease (HR = 6.15, CI 2.82-13.53, p < 0.001), and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR = 2.84, CI 1.54-5.23, p = 0.001). Among ICD settings, PR logic was the only discriminator independently related to a reduced risk of inappropriate shocks (HR = 0.18, CI 0.06-0.48, p = 0.001), along with an SVT limit enabled over 200 bpm (HR = 0.24, CI 0.11-0.51, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide cohort of primary prevention ICD-only patients, dual-chamber devices were related to lower risk of inappropriate shocks compared to single-chamber ICDs. Besides, PR logic and SVT limit > 200 bpm emerged as protective factors.

Ventricular tachycardia prediction in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

Clinical data analysis of 83 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for sudden cardiac death (SCD) primary prevention has been done. We revealed 5 parameters associated with the detection of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. These parameters formed the basis for constructing a logistic regression model. The model makes it possible to obtain the probability of occurrence of a specific event depending on the severity of the predictive parameters and the degree of its influence (risk of true ventricular arrhythmias detection). Estimating the potential risk of the life-threatening arrhythmias, individual programming options are required in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) to reduce the amount of unnecessary electrotherapy, as well as more accurate monitoring of the patient's drug therapy.

Influence of myopotential interference on the Wavelet discrimination algorithm in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Background

Wavelet is a morphology-based algorithm for detecting ventricular tachycardia. The electrogram (EGM) source of the Wavelet algorithm is nominally programmed with the Can-RV coil configuration, which records a far-field ventricular potential. Therefore, it may be influenced by myopotential interference.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 40 outpatients who had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with the Wavelet algorithm. The percent-match score of the Wavelet algorithm was measured during the isometric chest press by pressing the palms together. We classified patients with percent-match scores below 70% due to myopotential interference as positive morphology change, and those with 70% or more as negative morphology change. Stored episodes of tachycardia were evaluated during the follow-up.

Results

The number of patients in the positive morphology change group was 22 (55%). Amplitude of the Can-RV coil EGM was lower in the positive morphology change group compared to that in the negative group (3.9±1.3 mV vs. 7.4±1.6 mV, P=0.0015). The cut-off value of the Can-RV coil EGM was 5 mV (area under curve, 0.89). Inappropriate detections caused by myopotential interference occurred in two patients (5%) during a mean follow-up period of 49 months, and one of them received an inappropriate ICD shock. These patients had exhibited positive morphology change.

Conclusions

The Wavelet algorithm is influenced by myopotential interference when the Can-RV coil EGM is less than 5 mV.

Optimal Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Programming

Optimal programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is essential to appropriately treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias and to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate shocks. There have been a series of large clinical trials evaluating tailored programming of ICDs. We reviewed the clinical trials evaluating ICD therapies and detection, and the consensus statement on ICD programming. In doing so, we found that prolonged ICD detection times, higher rate cutoffs, and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) programming decreases inappropriate and painful therapies in a primary prevention population. The use of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia discriminators can also decrease inappropriate shocks. Tailored ICD programming using the knowledge gained from recent ICD trials can decrease inappropriate and unnecessary ICD therapies and decrease mortality.

A novel algorithm for ventricular arrhythmia classification using a fuzzy logic approach

In the present study, it has been shown that an unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock is often delivered to patients with an ambiguous ECG rhythm in the overlap zone between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF); these shocks significantly increase mortality. Therefore, accurate classification of the arrhythmia into VT, organized VF (OVF) or disorganized VF (DVF) is crucial to assist ICDs to deliver appropriate therapy. A classification algorithm using a fuzzy logic classifier was developed for accurately classifying the arrhythmias into VT, OVF or DVF. Compared with other studies, our method aims to combine ten ECG detectors that are calculated in the time domain and the frequency domain in addition to different levels of complexity for detecting subtle structure differences between VT, OVF and DVF. The classification in the overlap zone between VT and VF is refined by this study to avoid ambiguous identification. The present method was trained and tested using public ECG signal databases. A two-level classification was performed to first detect VT with an accuracy of 92.6 %, and then the discrimination between OVF and DVF was detected with an accuracy of 84.5 %. The validation results indicate that the proposed method has superior performance in identifying the organization level between the three types of arrhythmias (VT, OVF and DVF) and is promising for improving the appropriate therapy choice and decreasing the possibility of sudden cardiac death.

ICD discrimination of SVT versus VT with 1:1 V-A conduction: A review of the literature

Inappropriate ICD shocks are associated with increased mortality. They also impair patients' quality of life, increase hospitalizations, and raise health-care costs. Nearly 80% of inappropriate ICD shocks are caused by supraventricular tachycardia. Here we report the case of a patient who received a single-lead dual-chamber sensing ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death and experienced inappropriate ICD shocks. V-A time, electrogram morphology, and response to antitachycardia pacing suggested atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, which was confirmed in an electrophysiology study. Inspired by this case, we performed a literature review to discuss mechanisms for discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 A:V relationship from ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde conduction.

Discriminative sparse coding of ECG during ventricular arrhythmias using LC-K-SVD approach

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are two major types of ventricular arrhythmias that results due to abnormalities in the electrical activation in the ventricles of the heart. VF is the lethal of the two arrhythmias, which may lead to sudden cardiac death. The treatment options for the two arrhythmias are different. Therefore, detection and characterization of the two arrhythmias is critical to choose appropriate therapy options. Due to the time-varying nature of the signal content during cardiac arrhythmias, modeling and extracting information from them using time and frequency localized functions would be ideal. To this effect, in this work, we perform discriminative sparse coding of the ECG during ventricular arrhythmia with hybrid time-frequency dictionaries using the recently introduced Label consistent K-SVD (LC-K-SVD) approach. Using 944 segments of ventricular arrhythmias extracted from 23 patients in the Malignant Ventricular Ectopy and Creighton University Tachy-Arrhythmia databases, an overall classification accuracy of 71.55% was attained with a hybrid dictionary of Gabor and symlet4 atoms. In comparison, for the same database and non-trained dictionary (i.e the original dictionary) the classification accuracy was found to be 62.71%. In addition, the modeling error using the trained dictionary from LC-K-SVD approach was found to be significantly lower to the one using the non-trained dictionary.

Management of device-detected atrial high-rate episodes

Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) with atrial leads. These atrial tachyarrhythmias are detected as atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) by the CIED. AHREs may be brief, infrequent, and asymptomatic, and may be detected before clinical arrhythmia is apparent. These subclinical device-detected AHREs are associated with an increased stroke risk, similar to, but to a lesser degree than, clinically apparent atrial fibrillation detected by routine methods. Whether a specific duration of AHREs is needed before the risk of stroke increases and whether treatment with anticoagulation for subclinical device-detected AHREs reduces stroke risk is unclear.

Inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs: single chamber versus dual chamber

BACKGROUND

Despite the technological evolution of the implantable defibrillator, one of the questions that remains is the possible benefit of the dual chamber versus single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in reducing inappropriate shocks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate which type of device provides fewer inappropriate shocks (dual chamber versus single chamber) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized studies published in the literature comparing dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators to single chamber devices which have been known to cause, as an evaluated endpoint, inappropriate shocks.

RESULTS

The dual-chamber implantable cardioverter showed no benefit in reducing the number of inappropriate shocks. In fact, the opposite was shown. In the analysis of fixed effects, the association tended to favor single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (OR = 1.53, CI 95%: 0.91-2.57), despite the absence of statistical significance (p = 0.11). We highlight the heterogeneity observed in the results (I² = 53%), which motivated a replication of the analysis using a model of random effects. However, significant differences remained in the occurrence of inappropriate shocks in both groups (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.37-3.31; p = 0.86). To complement the analysis, we proceeded to perform sensitivity analysis, which showed that the exclusion of a study resulted in the lowest heterogeneity observed (I²=24%) and the association with inappropriate shocks significantly favored the single chamber cardiodefibrillator (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.09-3.37; p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

It was determined that there was no clear evidence of superiority of any of the devices evaluated.

How to improve outcomes: should we put more emphasis on programming and medical care and less on patient selection?

Many factors contribute to the pathophysiology and progression of heart failure (HF), offering the potential for many synergistic therapeutic approaches to its management. For patients, who have systolic HF, prolonged QRS and receiving guideline-indicated pharmacological therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may provide additional benefits in terms of symptom improvement and mortality reduction. Nevertheless, in many patients, moderate or severe symptoms may persist or recur after CRT implantation due to either the severity or progression of the underlying disease, the presence of important co-morbidities or suboptimal device programming. Identifying and, where possible, treating the reasons for persistent or recurrent symptoms in patients who have received CRT is an important aspect of patient care. The present review summarizes the available evidence on this topic.

Prospective comparison of discrimination algorithms to prevent inappropriate ICD therapy: primary results of the Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate therapy for supraventricular arrhythmias remains a significant source of morbidity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients.

OBJECTIVE

The Rhythm ID Goes Head to Head Trial (RIGHT) was designed to compare rhythm discrimination and inappropriate therapies among patients with ICDs from 2 manufacturers.

METHODS

Patients with standard ICD indications were randomized to receive a Guidant VITALITY 2 with Rhythm ID or selective Medtronic pulse generators using the Enhanced PR Logic or Wavelet discrimination algorithms. A single- or dual-chamber device was implanted based on clinical indications and programmed in 2 detection zones with detection enhancements enabled for rates between 150 and 200 bpm. Algorithm performance was compared between randomization groups, stratified by single or dual chamber, for the primary end point of first inappropriate therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing) for supraventricular arrhythmias.

RESULTS

There were 1962 patients enrolled and followed for 18.3 ± 9.2 months, with no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. There were 3973 treated episodes where electrograms were available and adjudicated. The primary end point of inappropriate therapy occurred in 246 of 985 VITALITY 2 patients vs 187 of 977 specific Medtronic ICD patients (hazard ratio = 1.34; confidence interval = 1.11-1.62; P = .003). Differences in inappropriate therapy were confined to single-chamber ICDs. Inappropriate shocks were more frequent in VITALITY 2 ICDs (hazard ratio = 1.63; confidence interval = 1.29-2.06; P < .001), with most therapies and performance differences occurring at slower rhythms (rates < 175 bpm).

CONCLUSION

Rhythm discrimination performed better in the specific Medtronic than in VITALITY 2 ICDs evaluated, particularly for single-chamber devices. Inappropriate therapies, and differences in performance, may be reduced with the use of rate cutoff above 175 bpm.

Significant increase in the incidence of ventricular arrhythmic events after an intrathoracic impedance change measured with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices are now capable of monitoring changes in intrathoracic impedance. Intrathoracic impedance monitoring resulting in a fluid index threshold crossing has been proven to predict heart failure (HF) exacerbations. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between changes in intrathoracic impedance and the occurrence of arrhythmic events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 282 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV HF who were implanted with a CRT-D device with a fluid index feature based on intrathoracic impedance monitoring capabilities, arrhythmic events were retrospectively analyzed in terms of the threshold crossings. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with fluid index threshold crossings and those without threshold crossings. A total of 4,725 tachyarrhythmic events were reported in 129 patients (46%), and there were 221 fluid index crossing events in 145 patients (51%) during 10.0 ± 3.2 months. Tachyarrhythmic events were more frequently recorded in patients with threshold crossing events than in those who did not experience a threshold crossing (3,241 vs. 1,484 events, P<0.0001). Ventricular tachyarrhythmic events mainly occurred within the first 30 days after the threshold crossing event; however, a similar trend was not observed for the atrial tachyarrhythmic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathoracic impedance monitoring may predict arrhythmic events, especially ventricular arrhythmias, in patients with HF and provides an additional management tool.

Wavelet-based features for characterizing ventricular arrhythmias in optimizing treatment options

Ventricular arrhythmias arise from abnormal electrical activity of the lower chambers (ventricles) of the heart. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are the two major subclasses of ventricular arrhythmias. While VT has treatment options that can be performed in catheterization labs, VF is a lethal cardiac arrhythmia, often when detected the patient receives an implantable defibrillator which restores the normal heart rhythm by the application of electric shocks whenever VF is detected. The classification of these two subclasses are important in making a decision on the therapy performed. As in the case of all real world process the boundary between VT and VF is ill defined which might lead to many of the patients experiencing arrhythmias in the overlap zone (that might be predominately VT) to receive shocks by the an implantable defibrillator. There may also be a small population of patients who could be treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs or catheterization procedure if they can be diagnosed to suffer from predominately VT after objectively analyzing their intracardiac electrogram data obtained from implantable defibrillator. The proposed work attempts to arrive at a quantifiable way to scale the ventricular arrhythmias into VT, VF, and the overlap zone arrhythmias as VT-VF candidates using features extracted from the wavelet analysis of surface electrograms. This might eventually lead to an objective way of analyzing arrhythmias in the overlap zone and computing their degree of affinity towards VT or VF. A database of 24 human ventricular arrhythmia tracings obtained from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database was analyzed and wavelet-based features that demonstrated discrimination between the VT, VF, and VT-VF groups were extracted. An overall accuracy of 75% in classifying the ventricular arrhythmias into 3 groups was achieved.

Optimal Programming of ICDs for Prevention of Appropriate and Inappropriate Shocks

Expansion of indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has led to a significant increase in the number of patients receiving ICDs and the number of lives saved because of ICD therapy. However, appropriate or inappropriate shocks are frequent and may result in a significant decrease in quality of life in patients with ICDs. Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, sinus tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with rapid conduction, and other supraventricular tachycardias are the most common arrhythmias causing inappropriate therapy. Other causes include oversensing of diaphragmatic potentials or myopotentials, T-wave oversensing, double or triple counting of intracardiac signals, lead fractures or header connection problems, lead chatter or noise, and electromagnetic interference. Strategies to reduce inappropriate therapy using device programming rely on the ability to distinguish supraventricular and atrial arrhythmias from ventricular tachycardia. Avoiding therapy for nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias and increasing the role of antitachycardia pacing to terminate ventricular tachycardia are key approaches to reducing shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. Optimal programming holds great promise for decreasing the overall incidence of shock therapy and increasing ICD acceptance.

Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy

Although improvements in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy have taken place, many challenges do remain. Inappropriate delivery of therapy is a big problem that impacts the quality of life of ICD recipients. Although there is now a clear understanding that atrial arrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate ICD therapies, physicians have not been very successful in preventing them. Additionally, although many tachycardia detection discriminators have been shown to be helpful, it is not clear that there is a particular combination that is ideal for all patients. Until such an algorithm is developed (which may not be possible), a detailed knowledge and use of all available programming options, guided by special characteristics of each unique patient, are the only foreseeable solutions. Finally, one must face the prospect that this problem cannot be vanquished, but only ameliorated.

A new approach for ICD rhythm classification based on support vector machines

Inappropriate shocks due to misclassification of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias remain a major problem in the care of patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of a new covariance-based support vector machine classifier, to distinguish ventricular tachycardia from other rhythms such as supraventricular tachycardia. The proposed algorithm is applicable on both single and dual chamber ICDs and has a low computational demand. The results demonstrate that suggested algorithm has considerable promise and merits further investigation.

Presence and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial implications for the risk of thromboembolic events

INTRODUCTION

Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) can expose patients to the risk of stroke. The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence of thromboembolic events in relationship with CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >or=75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke, or transient ischemic attack) score and AF presence/duration. The secondary objective was to compare intermittent versus continuous monitoring strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from patients with an implanted pacemaker and a history of AF were analyzed. Thromboembolic risk was quantified through CHADS(2) score. Three AF groups were considered: patients with <5-minutes AF on 1 day (AF-free); patients with >5-minutes AF on 1 day but <24 hours (AF-5 minutes); patients with AF episodes >24 hours (AF-24 hours). Monitoring strategies involving 24-hour Holter, 1-week Holter, and 30-day Holter were simulated. Data from 568 patients continuously monitored for 1 year were analyzed: 171 (30%) had CHADS(2) score = 0; 269 (47%) had CHADS(2) score = 1; 111 (20%) had CHADS(2) score = 2; and 17 (3%) had CHADS(2) score >or= 3. During follow-up, 14 patients (2.5%) had an ischemic thromboembolic event. AF-24 hours patients numbered 223 (39.2%); AF-5 minutes, 179 (31.5%); and AF-free, 29.2%. By combining AF presence/duration with CHADS(2) score, two subpopulations with markedly different risks of events (0.8% vs 5%, P = 0.035) were identified, the former corresponding to AF-free with CHADS(2)<or=2, or AF-5 minutes with CHADS(2)<or=1, or AF-24 hours with CHADS(2)= 0. The mean sensitivity in detecting an AF episode lasting >5 minutes was 44.4%, 50.4%, and 65.1% for 24-hour Holter, 1-week Holter, and 1-month Holter monitoring, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with recurrent AF episodes, risk stratification for thromboembolic events can be improved by combining CHADS(2) score with AF presence/duration.

Implantable CRT device diagnostics identify patients with increased risk for heart failure hospitalization

PURPOSE

To determine the association between device-determined diagnostic indices, including intrathoracic impedance, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.

METHODS

Clinical and device diagnostic data of 558 HF patients indicated for CRT-D therapy (In Sync Sentry, Medtronic Inc.) were prospectively collected from 34 centers. Device-recorded intrathoracic impedance fluid index threshold crossing event (TCE), mean activity counts, tachyarrhythmia events, night heart rate (NHR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were compared within patients with vs. without documented HF hospitalization.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 326 +/- 216 days. Patients hospitalized for HF had significantly higher rates of TCE, a higher percentage of days with the thoracic impedance fluid index above the programmed threshold, a higher percentage of days with low activity, with low HRV or with high NHR. Multivariate analysis showed that TCE resulted in a 36% increased probability of HF hospitalization. Both TCE duration and patient activity were also significantly associated with hospitalization. Kaplan Meier analysis indicated that patients with more TCE events were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (log rank test, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased intrathoracic impedance, low patient activity and low HRV were all independently associated with increased risk for HF hospitalization in HF patients treated with resynchronization therapy. Device-derived diagnostic data may provide valuable and reliable indices for the prognostic stratification of HF patients.

Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to provide a survival benefit in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. A major problem associated with ICD therapy is the occurrence of inappropriate shocks which impair patients' quality of life and may also be arrhythmogenic. Despite recent technological advances, the incidence of inappropriate shocks remains high, thus posing a challenge that we have to meet. In the present review we summarise the available tools and the strategies that can be followed in order to reduce inappropriate ICD shocks.

The Drug And Pace Health cliNical Evaluation (DAPHNE) study: a randomized trial comparing sotalol versus beta-blockers to treat symptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients with brady-tachycardia syndrome implanted with an antitachycardia pacemaker

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are mainly treated by pharmacologic therapy for rate control or rhythm control. The aim of our study was to compare sotalol (S) versus beta-blocking agents (BB) in terms of prevention of ATA, cardioversions (CVs), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (H) in patients paced for bradycardia-tachycardia form of sinus node disease (BT-SND).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-five patients (67 males, aged 73 +/- 7 years) were enrolled in a prospective, parallel, randomized, single-blind, multicenter study. All patients received a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker; after 1 month, 66 patients were randomly assigned to BB (62 +/- 26 and 104 +/- 47 mg/d for atenolol and metoprolol, respectively) and 69 patients to S (167 +/- 66 mg/d).

RESULTS

After an observation period of 12 months, the percentage of patients free from ATA recurrences was 29% in both BB and S group. Cardioversion and H were significantly (P < .01) fewer in the 12 months after implantation than in the 12 months before both in patients treated with S (CV 69.4% vs 22.2%, H 91.7% vs 33.3%) and in patients treated with BB (CV 58.5% vs 17.1%, H 82.9% vs 26.8%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a nonsignificant trend toward a lower incidence of the composite end point (CV + H) among BB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the complex context of "hybrid therapy" in patients with BT-SND implanted with a modern dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker device delivering atrial antitachycardia pacing, no differences were found between the use of beta-blocker and the use of S, at the relatively low dose achieved after clinical titration, in terms of prevention of cardiovascular H or need for atrial CV.

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND

The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improves survival in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriate ICD shocks are common adverse consequences that may impair quality of life.

METHODS

Stored ICD electrograms from all shock episodes were adjudicated centrally. An inappropriate shock episode was defined as an episode during which 1 or more inappropriate shocks occurred; another inappropriate ICD episode occurring within 5 min was not counted. Programmed parameters for patients with and without inappropriate shocks were compared.

RESULTS

One or more inappropriate shocks occurred in 83 (11.5%) of the 719 MADIT II ICD patients. Inappropriate shock episodes constituted 184 of the 590 total shock episodes (31.2%). Smoking, prior atrial fibrillation, diastolic hypertension, and antecedent appropriate shock predicted inappropriate shock occurrence. Atrial fibrillation was the most common trigger for inappropriate shock (44%), followed by supraventricular tachycardia (36%), and then abnormal sensing (20%). The stability detection algorithm was programmed less frequently in patients receiving inappropriate shocks (17% vs. 36%, p = 0.030), whereas other programming parameters did not differ significantly from those without inappropriate shocks. Importantly, patients with inappropriate shocks had a greater likelihood of all-cause mortality in follow-up (hazard ratio 2.29, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred commonly in the MADIT II study, and were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.

Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable defibrillators: A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing single-chamber and dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms

INTRODUCTION

A proposed benefit of dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination is a reduction in inappropriate therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to establish whether dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms reduce inappropriate device therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Public domain databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from 1996 to 2006. Two investigators abstracted data independently. Pooled estimates were calculated using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. We retrieved 5 prospective studies comparing dual-chamber with single-chamber arrhythmia discrimination, accumulating data on 748 patients. Pooled per-patient based analysis demonstrated that the number of patients receiving inappropriate ICD therapy was not different between single- and dual-chamber devices (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.81; p=0.31). Per-episode based analysis demonstrated a favoring benefit for dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.78; p<0.001). A mean reduction of 1.1 inappropriately treated atrial episodes per patient was observed with dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination is associated with a reduction in the number of inappropriate treated episodes. The number of patients who experience inappropriate therapy is not reduced by dual-chamber discrimination.

Duration of P-Wave Is Associated with Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalizations in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Paced for Bradycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common problem in pacemaker patients. We conducted a prospective observational study in patients paced for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF, to determine whether P-wave duration may stratify patients at higher risk for AF recurrences and AF-related hospitalizations. The patients were evaluated for the prevalence, cause, and predictors of hospitalization.

METHODS

We studied 660 consecutive patients (50% male, 72 +/- 9 years) who received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Median value of baseline P-wave duration was equal to 100 ms (25%-75% quartile range equal to 80-120 ms). We used this cut-off to divide the patients into group A (P < or = 100 ms), composed of 385 (58.3%) patients, and group B (P>100 ms), composed of 275 (41.7%) patients.

RESULTS

In a median follow-up of 19 months, 173 patients were hospitalized for all causes, 130 for cardiovascular causes, and 85 for AF-related hospitalizations. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that P-wave duration >100 ms identified patients at higher risk (OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.1-2.8), P = 0.044) for AF-related hospitalizations. Patients in group B (P > 100 ms) more frequently suffered AF-related hospitalizations (16.4% vs 10.4%, P = 0.02) and underwent more frequent cardioversions (14.5% vs 9.1%, P = 0.029) compared with group A (P < or = 100 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

P-wave duration may define the risk of persistent AF requiring cardioversion or AF-related hospitalization in patients with a pacemaker for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Effect of programmed number of intervals to detect ventricular fibrillation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator aborted and unnecessary shocks

INTRODUCTION

Detection of self-terminating arrhythmias by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) causes unnecessary battery depletion and unnecessary shocks. Our goal was to estimate the effect of the programmed number of intervals to detect (NID) ventricular fibrillation (VF) on ICD temporal episode rate, unnecessary shocks, and delay in detection of VF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 773 ICD-detected VF episodes in 875 patients. The number of intervals to detect VF was programmed to 12 of 16 (NID 12) in 305 patients and 18 of 24 (NID 18) in 570 patients. For patients with NID 12, we estimated the increase of mean cumulative episode rate at 6 months since implant and decrease in detection time for VF compared with a hypothetical NID 18. For patients with NID 18, we estimated the decrease of mean cumulative episode rate and unnecessary shocks compared with a hypothetical NID 12. Patients with NID 12 had a 17% increased episode rate resulting in unnecessary capacitor charging for self-terminating arrhythmias. Patients with NID 18 had a 22% decreased episode rate. In patients with NID 12, hypothetical NID 18 would have delayed detection of 273 VF episodes in 1.8 seconds. In patients with NID 18, hypothetical NID 12 would have resulted in inappropriate delivery of 14 aborted shocks in 10% of patients with episodes.

CONCLUSION

In patients with self-terminating device-detected VF, increasing the number of intervals to detect VF from 12/16 to 18/24 results in a clinically significant decrease in ICD detections and fewer unnecessary shocks with minimal incremental delay in VF detection.

Differentiation of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardias based on the analysis of the first postpacing interval after sequential anti-tachycardia pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients

BACKGROUND

Current discrimination algorithms do not completely avoid inappropriate tachycardia detection.

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzes the discrimination capability of the changes of the first postpacing interval (FPPI) after successive bursts of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) trains in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-recorded tachycardias.

METHODS

We included 50 ICD patients in this prospective study. We hypothesized that the FPPI variability (FPPIV) when comparing bursts with different numbers of beats would be shorter in ventricular tachycardias (VTs) compared with supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). The ATP (5-10 pulses, 91% of tachycardia cycle length) was programmed for tachycardias >240 ms.

RESULTS

Anti-tachycardia pacing was delivered during 37 sinus tachycardias (STs) in an exercise test, 96 induced VTs in an electrophysiological study, and 198 spontaneous episodes (144 VTs and 54 SVTs). The FPPI remained stable after all ATP bursts in VT but changed continuously in SVT; when comparing bursts of 5 and 10 pulses, the FPPIV was shorter in VT (34 +/- 65 vs.138 +/- 69, P<.0001, in all T and 12 +/- 20 vs. 138 +/- 69, P<.0001, in T>or=320 ms) than in SVT. In T>or=320 ms an FPPIV<or=50 ms between bursts of 5 and 10 pulses classified correctly 100% of VTs and 90% of SVTs. Anti-tachycardia pacing terminated 66% of induced VTs, 60% of spontaneous VTs, and 20% of spontaneous SVTs and induced no VT during spontaneous or exercise induced SVT. Five induced and two spontaneous VT episodes were accelerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of FPPIV after ATP discriminates ICD-detected T. Successive bursts (of ATP) trains at 91% of tachycardia cycle length are safe, despite being delivered before rhythm classification.

Incidence and Significance of Far-Field R Wave Sensing in a VDD-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

BACKGROUND

A VDD-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) provides atrioventricular (AV) synchronous stimulation when necessary and incorporates the advantages of dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms both at potentially lower costs and less periprocedural complications than a DDD-ICD system. A prerequisite for correct dual chamber ICD function is reliable atrial sensing.

METHODS

We evaluated atrial near- and ventricular far-field sensing and its impact on the dual-chamber detection algorithm in 106 patients with a single-lead VDD-ICD during a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty-nine follow-ups were included. Mean near-field amplitude was 3.82 +/- 1.76 mV; mean far-field amplitude was 0.31 +/- 0.15 mV. 46% of patients had far-fields >0.35 mV and 35% of patients showed atrial EGM markers corresponding to a ventricular far-field in at least one follow-up. Six hundred and forty-five tachycardia episodes were evaluated. Due to far-field sensing, three of 66 episodes (4.5%) of sinus tachycardia were misclassified as ventricular tachycardia (VT), leading to antitachycardia therapies. Delayed detection of VT was seen in a 12 of 323 episodes (3.7%) in five of 62 patients (8%) having VT events (delay 6.4 +/- 6.0 seconds (range 2-24 seconds)). Stable far-field amplitudes <0.2 mV in a follow-up had a high negative predictive value for the occurrence of malfunction during tachycardia-conversely, high far-field amplitudes or a high incidence of far-field markers are only moderately correlated with malfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular far-field sensing in a VDD-ICD is not uncommon, however, tachycardia detection by the dual chamber algorithm is not seriously impaired by far-field sensing.

Design and analysis issues in cardiac arrhythmia trials: insights from the Detect Supraventricular Tachycardia Trial

Background The Detect Supraventricular Tachycardia (Detect SVT) trial was a randomized single blind study in subjects receiving a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The primary goal was to evaluate whether dual chamber enhancements result in greater discrimination between supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular episodes when compared to ventricular-only enhancements.

Purpose The purpose of this report is to describe our experiences from an analytic perspective, including overall study design, the value of blinded episode review, and the statistical analysis plan.

Methods The Detect SVT study was a parallel group study, with blinded central review of all arrhythmia episodes occurring over a six-month period. The primary response was the proportion of inappropriate detections (SVT episodes that are inappropriately classified as ventricular by the device).

Results A parallel group design was essential as unplanned crossovers were very differential. The blinded review of episodes was a major use of resources, with over 2300 episodes observed. This review did not materially alter the findings, however, the avoidance of any perceived bias was a major strength. The value of collecting large numbers of episodes on a single subject was found to be minimal. A Kaplan–Meier analysis of the number of SVT episodes until first inappropriate detection was found to add additional information.

Limitations The recommendations reported here relate to cardiac arrhythmia trials, or other studies with very similar endpoints. These observations are based on the results of a single trial and should be confirmed in other studies.

Conclusions The parallel group design was essential, as was accounting for within-subject correlation in the analysis. The blinded review process was also important, but significant resources could be saved by closing-out episode collection after a fixed number of episodes. Lessons learned from the Detect SVT trial may prove useful to others designing trials in this active research area.

Temporal variability of atrial fibrillation in pacemaker recipients for bradycardia: implications for crossover designed trials, study sample size, and identification of responder patients by means of arrhythmia burden

BACKGROUND

Most clinical trials that have tested pacing therapies to prevent and treat atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) have chosen endpoints such as AT frequency or burden (defined as percentage of time a patient is in AT), but failed to show unequivocal evidence of a clinical impact.

AIM

The aim of our multicenter prospective observational study was to measure the variability of AT burden and estimate its impact on study outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty patients indicated for permanent pacing and suffering from AT (age 71 +/- 9 years; 47.2% male) received a dual-chamber pacemaker. AT burden was measured in two consecutive, 2-month observation periods; the Monte Carlo method was then applied to simulate findings of a crossover design study. We simulated several models of therapy impact, each model being characterized by the percentage of responder patients and the percentage reduction in AT burden. To show a significant impact of AT therapies in a sample of 250 patients in whom 100, 75, or 50% would be theoretical responders to therapies, AT burden reduction should be at least 27, 32, or 57%, respectively. Temporal fluctuations in AT burden were so high that about 60% of patients would falsely appear as responders or nonresponders in a crossover study, regardless of AT burden reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients paced for bradycardia and suffering from AT, high intrapatient variability in AT burden was measured. Various models of therapy impact showed that, in crossover trials of AT therapies, time-related fluctuations in AT burden negatively impact on sample sizes and impair the ability to identify patients as responders or nonresponders.

A new method to investigate the response to the morphology discrimination algorithm in patients with ICD

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is still a major problem in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The morphology discrimination algorithm compares the morphology of a tachycardia electrogram with a stored template on a beat-to-beat basis. However, algorithm responders could not yet be identified prior to the occurrence of first tachycardia episodes. We analyzed whether rapid atrial pacing and/or exercise testing can be used for identification of responders and compared the results with ICD detected tachycardia.

METHODS

22 patients (16 male, 61+/-14 years) with dual-chamber ICDs have been enrolled. Patients underwent a standardized bicycle exercise testing and an atrial pacing protocol. For both tests, morphology match scores of 8 consecutive beats were analyzed for each 10-bpm-step increment above sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized as responders, if morphology match was > or = 90% of tested heart rates. During follow-up, ICD stored episodes with morphology discrimination activated were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between morphology match (85+/-29% vs. 84+/-27%) and linear regression slope B (-0.19+/-0.87 vs. -0.20+/-0.48) during exercise testing and atrial pacing. 16 patients (73%) were classified as responders. During follow-up (739+/-338 days) 121 sustained supraventricular (n=88) and ventricular tachycardia (n=33) were detected in 10 patients (45%). Specificity for tachycardia discrimination was 78% overall, 100% in responders and 22% in non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Exercise testing and atrial pacing were equally suitable for identification of patients who seem to respond to the morphology discrimination algorithm with a high specificity for ventricular tachycardia discrimination. Thus, morphology match tests are suggested to optimize tachycardia discrimination and to reduce inadequate therapies.