Reduction of enzyme levels by propranolol after acute myocardial infarction

Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning

Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and the potential to provide novel therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. While many signaling pathways leading to endogenous cardioprotection have been elucidated in experimental studies over the past 30 years, no cardioprotective drug is on the market yet for that indication. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic preclinical evaluation of promising cardioprotective therapies prior to their clinical evaluation, since ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by or associated with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. These risk factors and comorbidities induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these comorbidities may impact on cardioprotection by again modifying cellular signaling pathways. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their medications may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need for taking into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple comorbidities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality; however, there are still no cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most studies on cardioprotection have been undertaken in animal models of ischemia/reperfusion in the absence of comorbidities; however, ischemic heart disease develops with other systemic disorders (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atherosclerosis). Here we focus on the preclinical and clinical evidence showing how these comorbidities and their routine medications affect ischemia/reperfusion injury and interfere with cardioprotective strategies.

Beta-blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death globally. According to the World Health Organization, 7.4 million people died from ischaemic heart diseases in 2012, constituting 15% of all deaths. Acute myocardial infarction is caused by blockage of the blood supplied to the heart muscle. Beta-blockers are often used in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Previous meta-analyses on the topic have shown conflicting results ranging from harms, neutral effects, to benefits. No previous systematic review using Cochrane methodology has assessed the effects of beta-blockers for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention in people with suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded and BIOSIS Citation Index in June 2019. We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, Turning Research into Practice, Google Scholar, SciSearch, and the reference lists of included trials and previous reviews in August 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention in people with suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction. Trials were included irrespective of trial design, setting, blinding, publication status, publication year, language, and reporting of our outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the Cochrane methodological recommendations. Four review authors independently extracted data. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events according to the International Conference on Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction during follow-up). Our secondary outcomes were quality of life, angina, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction during follow-up. Our primary time point of interest was less than three months after randomisation. We also assessed the outcomes at maximum follow-up beyond three months. Due to risk of multiplicity, we calculated a 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the primary outcomes and a 98% CI for the secondary outcomes. We assessed the risks of systematic errors through seven bias domains in accordance to the instructions given in the Cochrane Handbook. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed by GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 trials randomising a total of 85,550 participants (mean age 57.4 years). Only one trial was at low risk of bias. The remaining trials were at high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence according to GRADE ranged from very low to high. Fifty-six trials commenced beta-blockers during the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction and seven trials during the subacute phase. At our primary time point 'less than three months follow-up', meta-analysis showed that beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention probably reduce the risk of a reinfarction during follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 98% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.91; 67,562 participants; 18 trials; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.5% and a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 196 participants. However, we found little or no effect of beta-blockers when assessing all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 97.5% CI 0.90 to 1.00; 80,452 participants; 46 trials/47 comparisons; high-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.4% and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08; 45,852 participants; 1 trial; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.4%. Regarding angina, it is uncertain whether beta-blockers have a beneficial or harmful effect (RR 0.70, 98% CI 0.25 to 1.84; 98 participants; 3 trials; very low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 7.1%. None of the trials specifically assessed nor reported serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP. Only two trials specifically assessed major adverse cardiovascular events, however, no major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in either trial. At maximum follow-up beyond three months, meta-analyses showed that beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention probably reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.93, 97.5% CI 0.86 to 0.99; 25,210 participants; 21 trials/22 comparisons; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.1% and a NNTB of 91 participants, and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 98% CI 0.83 to 0.98; 22,457 participants; 14 trials/15 comparisons; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.2% and a NNTB of 83 participants. However, it is uncertain whether beta-blockers have a beneficial or harmful effect when assessing major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.81, 97.5% CI 0.40 to 1.66; 475 participants; 4 trials; very low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.7%; reinfarction (RR 0.89, 98% CI 0.75 to 1.08; 6825 participants; 14 trials; low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.9%; and angina (RR 0.64, 98% CI 0.18 to 2.0; 844 participants; 2 trials; very low-quality evidence). None of the trials specifically assessed nor reported serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP. None of the trials assessed quality of life. We identified two ongoing randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of early administration of beta-blockers after percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolysis to patients with an acute myocardial infarction and one ongoing trial investigating the effect of long-term beta-blocker therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our present review indicates that beta-blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction probably reduce the short-term risk of a reinfarction and the long-term risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Nevertheless, it is most likely that beta-blockers have little or no effect on the short-term risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Regarding all remaining outcomes (serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP, major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction during follow-up), the long-term risk of a reinfarction during follow-up, quality of life, and angina), further information is needed to confirm or reject the clinical effects of beta-blockers on these outcomes for people with or suspected of acute myocardial infarction.

Labetalol infusion in acute myocardial infarction with systemic hypertension

1 Fifteen patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and systemic BP of greater than 160/110 mmHg were treated with an incremental infusion of labetalol. 2 Systemic BPs were safely and effectively lowered to less than 130 mm Hg systolic or 90 mmHg diastolic in all pateints. 3 Heart rate, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure cardiac index and stroke work index were significantly reduced. 4 The dose of labetalol varied from 30 mg-440 mg and was significantly higher (mean 295 mg) in those patients with pre-existing systemic hypertension compared with others (mean 133 mg). 5 No side- effects occurred and all patients survived to leave hospital.

Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome--a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) beta-blockade is currently a Class IIa recommendation in early management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without obvious contraindications.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register for Controlled Clinical Trials for randomized clinical trials from 1965 through December, 2011, comparing intravenous beta-blockers administered within 12 hours of presentation of ACS with standard medical therapy and/or placebo. The primary outcome assessed was the risk of short-term (in-hospital mortality-with maximum follow up duration of 90 days) all-cause mortality in the intervention group versus the comparator group. The secondary outcomes assessed were ventricular tachyarrhythmias, myocardial reinfarction, cardiogenic shock, and stroke. Pooled treatment effects were estimated using relative risk with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio, using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies enrolling 73,396 participants met the inclusion ⁄ exclusion criteria. In- hospital mortality was reduced 8% with intravenous beta-blockers, RR=0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00; p=0.04) when compared with controls. Moreover, intravenous beta-blockade reduced the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (RR=0.61; 95 % CI 0.47-0.79; p=0.0003) and myocardial reinfarction (RR=0.73, 95 % CI 0.59-0.91; p=0.004) without increase in the risk of cardiogenic shock, (RR=1.02; 95% CI 0.77-1.35; p=0.91) or stroke (RR=0.58; 95 % CI 0.17-1.98; p=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous beta-blockers early in the course of appropriate patients with ACS appears to be associated with significant reduction in the risk of short-term cardiovascular outcomes, including a reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality.

An update on cardioprotection: a review of the latest adjunctive therapies to limit myocardial infarction size in clinical trials

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with subsequent left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Rapid advances in the treatment of AMI, mainly through timely reperfusion, have substantially improved outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and particularly ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A vast amount of research, both translational and clinical, has been published on various pharmacological and interventional techniques to prevent myocardial cell death during the time of ischemia and subsequent reperfusion. Several methods of cardioprotection have shown the ability to limit myocardial infarction size in clinical trials. Examples of interventional techniques that have proven beneficial are ischemic post-conditioning and remote ischemic per-conditioning, both of which can reduce infarction size. Lowering core body temperature with cold saline infusion and cooling catheters have also been shown to be effective in certain circumstances. The most promising pharmaceutical cardioprotective agents at this time appear to be adenosine, atrial natriuretic peptide, and cyclosporine, with other potentially effective medications in the pipeline. Additional pre-clinical and clinical research is needed to further investigate newer cardioprotective strategies to continue the current trend of improving outcomes following AMI.

A review and meta-analysis of studies on the effect and timing of β-blocker administration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

The utility of β-blockers during an evolving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has substantial theoretic physiological backing. This coupled with early successes using β-blockers in STEMI promulgated multiple guidelines expanding the use of this class of medication to all patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, recent studies have questioned the utility of β-blockers in the emergency department in these patients. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence behind the use of β-blockers in the emergency department for STEMI patients.

Does the early administration of beta-blockers improve the in-hospital mortality rate of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome?

OBJECTIVES

Beta-blockade is currently recommended in the early management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This was a systematic review of the medical literature to determine if early beta-blockade improves the outcome of patients with ACS.

METHODS

The authors searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1965 through May 2009 using a search strategy derived from the following PICO formulation of our clinical question: Patients included adults (18+ years) with an acute or suspected myocardial infarction (MI) within 24 hours of onset of chest pain. Intervention included intravenous or oral beta-blockers administered within 8 hours of presentation. The comparator included standard medical therapy with or without placebo versus early beta-blocker administration. The outcome was the risk of in-hospital death in the intervention groups versus the comparator groups. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed. Qualitative methods were used to summarize the study results. In-hospital mortality rates were compared using a forest plot of relative risk (RR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) between beta-blockers and controls. Statistical analysis was done with Review Manager V5.0.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles (total N = 72,249) met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. For in-hospital mortality, RR = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.01). In the largest of these studies (n = 45,852), a significantly higher rate (p < 0.0001) of cardiogenic shock was observed in the beta-blocker (5.0%) versus control group (3.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review failed to demonstrate a convincing in-hospital mortality benefit for using beta-blockers early in the course of patients with an acute or suspected MI.

Effect of early treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs on short and long-term mortality in patients with an acute cardiovascular event

BACKGROUND

Acute cardiovascular events represent a therapeutic challenge. Blood pressure lowering drugs are commonly used and recommended in the early phase of these settings. This review analyses randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for this approach.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of immediate and short-term administration of anti-hypertensive drugs on all-cause mortality, total non-fatal serious adverse events (SAE) and blood pressure, in patients with an acute cardiovascular event, regardless of blood pressure at the time of enrollment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane clinical trial register from Jan 1966 to February 2009 were searched. Reference lists of articles were also browsed. In case of missing information from retrieved articles, authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-hypertensive drug with placebo or no treatment administered to patients within 24 hours of the onset of an acute cardiovascular event.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Fixed effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five RCTs (N=166,206) were included, evaluating four classes of anti-hypertensive drugs: ACE inhibitors (12 trials), beta-blockers (20), calcium channel blockers (18) and nitrates (18). Acute stroke was studied in 6 trials (all involving CCBs). Acute myocardial infarction was studied in 59 trials. In the latter setting immediate nitrate treatment (within 24 hours) reduced all-cause mortality during the first 2 days (RR 0.81, 95%CI [0.74,0.89], p<0.0001). No further benefit was observed with nitrate therapy beyond this point. ACE inhibitors did not reduce mortality at 2 days (RR 0.91,95%CI [0.82, 1.00]), but did after 10 days (RR 0.93, 95%CI [0.87,0.98] p=0.01). No other blood pressure lowering drug administered as an immediate treatment or short-term treatment produced a statistical significant mortality reduction at 2, 10 or >/=30 days. There was not enough data studying acute stroke, and there were no RCTs evaluating other acute cardiovascular events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Nitrates reduce mortality (4-8 deaths prevented per 1000) at 2 days when administered within 24 hours of symptom onset of an acute myocardial infarction. No mortality benefit was seen when treatment continued beyond 48 hours. Mortality benefit of immediate treatment with ACE inhibitors post MI at 2 days did not reach statistical significance but the effect was significant at 10 days (2-4 deaths prevented per 1000). There is good evidence for lack of a mortality benefit with immediate or short-term treatment with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for acute myocardial infarction.

Acute intervention with metoprolol in myocardial infarction

Studies in experimental and clinical myocardial infarction support the idea that sympathetic activity and myocardial noradrenaline release play a significant role in the development of myocardial ischemic damage. Betablockade has been shown to limit infarct size and lower the incidence of ventricular fibrillation in experimental models. Betablockade to patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce ischemia reflected as reduction of ischemic chest pain, decrease ST-segment elevation and increase lactate extraction. Whether this treatment in the clinical situation can prevent development of infarction, reduce infarct size and early mortality in man remains to be proven. In Gøteborg a double-blind study on metoprolol and placebo was started four and a half years ago. Inclusion of pts. in the study has been terminated and survival data will be available on May 1, 1981. 1395 pts. were included of whom 800 developed AMI. Metoprolol 15 mg was given IV followed by a total daily dose of 200 mg/day. The tolerance for betablockade was generally good. Analysis of serum enzyme estimations of maximal LD I + II showed a significant reduction by metoprolol when the treatment was given within 12 hours of onset of pain. In a subgroup consisting of 103 pts. with AMI metoprolol had no clearcut effects on the ventricular arrhythmias during the first 24 hours in hospital. The betablockade resulted in a 15% reduction in heart rate. The main objective of this study, the mortality during three months of blind treatment will be published late in 1981.

Cardiac protection during acute myocardial infarction: Where do we stand in 2004?

Despite better outcomes with early coronary artery reperfusion for the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), morbidity and mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain significant, the incidence of congestive heart failure continues to increase, and there is a need to provide better cardioprotection (therapy that reduces the amount of necrosis that may be coupled with better clinical outcome) in the setting of AMI. Since the introduction of the concept of cardiac protection over a quarter of a century ago, various interventions have been investigated to reduce myocardial infarct size. Intravenous beta-blockers administered in the early hours of infarction were clearly shown to be of benefit. Intravenous adenosine appeared promising for anterior wall AMIs, as did cariporide in some studies. Glucose-insulin-potassium infusion was beneficial in certain subgroups of patients, particularly diabetics. A variety of other medications were studied with negative or marginal results. The best strategy to limit infarct size is early reperfusion with percutaneous coronary stenting or thrombolytic therapy. Stenting is superior and should be adopted whenever there is a qualified laboratory available. Available resources should focus on decreasing time from onset of symptoms to start of reperfusion and maintaining vessel patency. Future studies powered to better assess clinical outcome are needed for adjunctive therapy with adenosine, K(ATP) channel openers, Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibitors, and hypothermia.

Prevention of cardiac cell injury during acute myocardial infarction: possible role for complement inhibition

The purpose of this article is to describe mechanisms of cell death in patients with acute myocardial infarction, particularly the activation of the complement system. Various pro-inflammatory cytokines, released by the inflamed tissue, play a role in the activation of the complement system. Several complement inhibitors have been developed to reduce tissue damage following ischemia. According to animal studies the deleterious effects of activators of the complement system can be diminished by complement inhibition. Several clinical studies have been conducted for the potential treatment of cell injury during acute myocardial infarction. C1 inhibitor dose-dependently inhibited complement activation and appeared to reduce myocardial injury after reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. C1 inhibitor dose-dependently reduced plasma levels of C4 activation fragments. In addition, cardiac enzymes (troponin T and creatine kinase-MB) returned to baseline levels more rapidly among patients treated with C1 inhibitor, compared with controls. Furthermore, preliminary results from a placebo-controlled trial indicate that treatment with intravenous pexelizumab (anti-C5 antibody) was well tolerated in a large number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Further, more randomized trials are necessary to clarify the clinical significance of this new and innovative treatment with complement inhibition.

Treatment of Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention and treatment of myocardial ischemia re mains a central focus of perioperative care. Myocardial ischemia is best understood in terms of myocardial oxygen supply and demand ratios. Conventional ther apy includes nitrates, β-blockers, and calcium channel blockers. In all 3 drug classes, ischemia is reduced by either improving supply, decreasing demand, or both. More recent investigation evaluates these medications either as prophylactic therapy or as a component of long-term risk reduction for cardiac morbid events. Newer therapies, including anticoagulation, pain ther apy, normothermia, central neuroaxial techniques, and other therapies, are reviewed.

[Perioperative beta-blockers. Part two: therapeutic indications]

PURPOSE

To review the pharmacologic and pathophysiologic information necessary to prescribe beta-blockers (BB) in perioperative medicine.

DATA SOURCE

Manual retrieval and electronic research of the literature using MEDLINE (key-words: anesthesia and beta- blocker; surgery and beta-blocker).

DATA SYNTHESIS

In non cardiac surgery, the beneficial effects of BB have been demonstrated in hypertensive patients since 1979. In 1996, the beneficial effects of atenolol in patients with coronary artery disease (reduction of postoperative myocardial ischemia and overall reduction in two-year mortality) were demonstrated. In coronary surgery, the interest of preoperative BB treatment has been shown since 1983. Administration of BB has been shown to be beneficial in acute myocardial infarction or chronic cardiac failure (except in NYHA class IV patients).

CONCLUSION

BB have been shown to exert a beneficial effect on postoperative outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and their more widespread use in perioperative medicine is encouraged.

Carvedilol prevents remodeling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of carvedilol, a vasodilating nonselective beta-blocker, on the indexes of left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in those with left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with predischarge left ventricular ejection fraction <45% after acute myocardial infarction were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study (selected from the database of the Carvedilol Heart Attack Pilot Study: CHAPS). Patients received medication after thrombolysis and continued to do so for 6 months. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed before discharge (7 to 10 days after admission) and at 3 months after acute myocardial infarction. Analysis of variance showed that wall thickness opposite the site of infarction decreased from (mean +/- SD) 12.3 +/- 2.1 mm to 11.0 +/- 2.4 mm with carvedilol compared with 11.6 +/- 1.9 mm to 12.2 +/- 1.9 mm with placebo (P =.01). Left ventricular mass changed from 235 +/- 74 g to 217 +/- 64 g with carvedilol compared with 227 +/- 80 g to 252 +/- 85 g with placebo ( P =.02). Carvedilol prevented alteration of sphericity index (ratio of long and short axis of left ventricle) that changed from 1.65 +/- 0.29 to 1.66 +/- 20 with carvedilol compared with 1.58 +/- 0.33 to 1.39 +/- 0.19 with placebo (P =.02); alteration was also prevented of wall thickening abnormality at infarct site, which changed from 9.2 +/- 3.1 cm2 to 9.1 +/- 3.5 cm 2 with carvedilol compared with 10.3 +/- 3.3 cm2 to 13.5 +/- 4.6 cm2 with placebo (P =.002).

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol administered early after acute myocardial infarction results in attenuation of left ventricular remodeling in patients with persistent left ventricular dysfunction before discharge.

Effects of metoprolol on early infarct expansion after acute myocardial infarction

The effects of metoprolol on early infarct expansion after acute myocardial infarction were studied in rats (n = 54) that underwent either left coronary artery ligation (MI) or sham operation. Immediately after surgery, the rats received either metoprolol (M) by mouth, which had been dissolved in drinking water, for 72 hours supplemented with three intraperitoneal doses over the first 24 hours or no treatment (H2O). Three days after the initial surgery, hemodynamic measurements were made before and after volume loading. The rats were killed, the hearts were removed, and passive pressure-volume curves were obtained. The hearts were then fixed at a constant pressure and analyzed morphometrically. Infarct size was nonsignificantly lower in the metoprolol-treated group compared with the untreated group (38% +/- 5% MI-M vs 48% +/- 3% MI-H2O, p = 0.10) Compared with infarcted untreated rats, infarcted metoprolol-treated rats had a lower heart rate (322 +/- 13 beats/min MI-M vs 452 +/- 19 beats/min MI-H2O, p < 0.001), lower left ventricular systolic pressure (63 +/- 4 mm Hg MI-M vs 90 +/- 6 mm Hg MI-H2O, p = 0.004), and lower +dp/dt (1340 +/- 169 mm Hg/sec MI-M vs 2872 +/- 273 mm Hg/sec MI-H2O, p < 0.001), but left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and cardiac index did not differ between the two groups. Left ventricular weight corrected for body weight was higher in infarcted rats treated with metoprolol compared with infarcted untreated rats (2.76 +/- 0.07 gm/kg MI-M vs 2.41 +/- 0.09 gm/kg MI-H2O, p < 0.05). The initial slope of the pressure-volume relationship Ki, an index of operative volume stiffness, was lower in infarcted rats treated with metoprolol compared with infarcted untreated rats (p = 0.03). There were, however, no significant differences in the expansion index, thinning ratio, or left ventricular volume between the two infarcted groups. Thus metoprolol therapy begun in the immediate postinfarction period promotes an increase in left ventricular weight and reduces operative volume stiffness but has no significant effect on indexes of early infarct expansion.

Ten year mortality in relation to original size of myocardial infarct: results from the Gothenburg metoprolol study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relation between the extent of a myocardial infarct, measured according to maximum serum enzyme activity of lactate dehydrogenase, and mortality at 10 years.

PATIENTS

In 759 patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom serum activity of heat stable lactate dehydrogenase had been determined every 12 hours for 108 hours after randomisation in an early intervention trial with metoprolol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mortality at 10 years in relation to quartile of maximum serum lactate dehydrogenase activity and history of cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Among all patients mortality at 10 years was 39% in the lowest quartile, 51% in the second quartile, 50% in the third, and 59% in the fourth (p < 0.001 for relation between infarct size and 10 year mortality). Among patients without a history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension the mortality in each quartile was 29%, 32%, 41%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001 for relation between infarct size and 10 year mortality). Among patients with any of these risk indicators the association between the estimated infarct size and mortality at 10 years was weak (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Estimated size of a myocardial infarct and mortality over 10 years seem to be related but mainly in patients without a history of cardiovascular disease.

Non-invasive diagnosis of arterial patency after thrombolytic treatment and its relation to prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To validate a simple noninvasive method with serial creatine kinase measurements for diagnosis of early patency of the infarct related artery after thrombolytic treatment with streptokinase. To investigate the relation between early patency of the infarct related artery and prognosis.

DESIGN

Patients under 76 years of age and seen within six hours of the start of prolonged chest pain and ST segment elevation were treated with streptokinase (1.5 x 10(6) U) intravenously over 30-60 minutes. Blood for measurement of total creatine kinase activity was taken at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after starting treatment. The rise in enzyme activity at each time from baseline was expressed as a proportion of the total rise from baseline to peak.

PATIENTS

Patients studied were in the following groups: (a) Sixty patients took part in a validation study with angiographic determination of patency of the infarct related coronary artery at 2.6 (0.3) hours (mean (SD)) after starting streptokinase. (b) A further 258 patients did not have early arteriography, but data were added to those from the 60 validation patients to find the relation between enzymatically determined early patency of the infarct related artery and 30 day mortality. (c) A further subset of 232 patients with first infarctions (including patients from groups (a) and (b) had angiocardiography at three weeks after infarction, and data were used to investigate the relation between early patency of the infarct related artery and left ventricular function.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Normalised rate of rise of creatine kinase activity at three hours after starting streptokinase in relation to angiographic patency of the infarct related coronary artery at 2.5 hours; 30 day cardiac mortality; and left ventricular function at three weeks in survivors of first infarction.

RESULTS

In the validation study, a rise in three hour creatine kinase activity of > 20% of peak occurred in 34/37 patients with initially patent infarct related coronary arteries (sensitivity 92%), and a rise to < 20% of peak occurred in 21/23 patients with initially occluded arteries (specificity 91%). In the prognostic study, 30 day mortality was 2.1% in the 191 patients with three hour creatine kinase > 20% of peak and 8.7% in the 127 patients with three hour creatine kinase < 20% of peak (p < 0.01). Angiocardiography in three week survivors of anterior infarction (n = 95) showed better left ventricular function when three hour creatine kinase was > or = 20% than when it was < 20% of peak (mean (SEM) end systolic volume 71 (5) v 96 (9) ml, p < 0.02; ejection fraction 56% (2%) v 51% (2%), NS).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive determination of early patency of the infarct related artery by the normalised rate of rise of creatine kinase activity at three hours seems to be reliable, and may be prognostically important and of value for use in clinical trials.

Pharmacological management of acute myocardial infarction

The routine medical management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has undergone major changes in the last decade. Several large-scale trials have firmly established the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy, beta blockers, and aspirin in the treatment of AMI. The critical issues include reducing myocardial oxygen demand and restoring adequate blood supply to the ischemic regions of the myocardium. As a result, the ability to intervene in patients with AMI has improved significantly. The purpose of this review is to discuss briefly the results of major trials of primary and secondary pharmacological intervention which had a direct impact on the care of patients with AMI. It concludes with current recommendations for the management of patients with AMI.

Heart rate and beta-adrenergic mechanisms in acute myocardial infarction

Increased heart rate is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Elevated heart rate is due to increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity. In placebo-controlled trials beta-blockers are known to reduce mortality as well as morbidity and these effects are most evident among patients with elevated heart rate. Studies on circadian variation have demonstrated that there is an increased sympathetic activity in the morning as well as a more frequent onset of ischemic attacked including acute myocardial infarction and sudden death. There seems to be a close relationship between increased sympathetic activity and the onset of ischemic events which can be prevented by prophylactic institution of a beta-blocker.

Advantages of beta blockers versus antiarrhythmic agents and calcium antagonists in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

Patients who have sustained greater than or equal to 1 myocardial infarcts are at high risk for sudden death or reinfarction; the risk is highest for those with lowest ventricular ejection fraction, continuing myocardial ischemia and asymptomatic high-density and complex premature ventricular contractions. At present, beta blockers when given prophylactically are the only agents that reduce the incidence of sudden death and reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 2 years. The beneficial effect was shown to correlate with a reduction in heart rate, the effect being absent or deleterious with beta blockers with marked sympathomimetic activity. The effects of beta blockers on ventricular fibrillation appeared to be dissociated from those on premature ventricular contractions. Trials with calcium antagonists indicate that these drugs had no effect or increased the mortality rate. The divergent effect of beta blockers and calcium antagonists is unexplained but may be due in part to a lack of bradycardiac effect of calcium antagonists; there were no differences in effect among different calcium antagonists. Data from trials involving class I antiarrhythmic agents indicate that agents acting by depression of cardiac conduction are either devoid of effect or produce a modest increase in mortality. Results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, employing the newer class I agents flecainide and encainide, were used to determine whether the suppression of premature ventricular contractions in the survivors of acute MI reduces mortality. Flecainide and encainide suppressed premature ventricular contractions greater than 80%, but resulted in an increased mortality rate undoubtedly due to a marked proarrhythmic effect. Whether these data can be extrapolated to all class I agents is uncertain. Preliminary data with class III antiarrhythmic agents suggest that these agents, especially amiodarone, similarly to beta blockers, have the potential to reduce mortality in survivors of MI. Evolving data suggest that in the secondary prevention of morbid events in the survivors of acute MI, the focus must shift away from antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction and toward beta blockers and antifibrillatory actions resulting from a prolongation of refractoriness.

Preventive strategies in management of acute myocardial infarction

Recent studies on pathogenetic mechanisms, supplemented by findings in clinical trials point the way to a logical approach to acute evolving myocardial infarction. This is designed in the earliest stage to limit infarction through reduction in myocardial oxygen demands, improvement in collateral blood supply and dissolution of coronary thrombus, to prevent in a later stage coronary reocclusion through administration of antiplatelet agents, and then to prevent infarct expansion through reduction in ventricular wall tension throughout the period of repair. Application of such an approach holds the promise of reducing infarct size and all the complications of infarction, as well as short and long-term mortality. The approach is active and aggressive, and contrasts with the approach applied a decade ago, where infarction was accepted as inevitable and therapies were reserved for managing its complications.

Reduced risk of death at 28 days in patients taking a beta blocker before admission to hospital with myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To see whether patients taking an oral beta blocker at the time of admission to hospital with myocardial infarction have a reduced risk of death at 28 days.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data collected on patients admitted over four years.

SETTING

Community based study.

PATIENTS

2430 Consecutive patients living in the Perth statistical division admitted to hospital with myocardial infarction during 1984-7.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Survival at 28 days among patients taking a beta blocker at onset of myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Patients were grouped into those who were and were not taking a beta blocker at the time of admission. Though patients taking a beta blocker were older and more likely to have a history of myocardial infarction, angina, or hypertension, the overall mortality at 28 days was similar in the two groups. A logistic regression model used to adjust for factors predictive of cardiac death at 28 days confirmed that patients taking a beta blocker at the time of admission had a significantly reduced risk of death (relative risk 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.76). Though the incidence of fatal ventricular fibrillation was similar in the two groups, mean peak creatine kinase activity was significantly lower in the beta blocker group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the value of long term use of beta blockers in patients at risk of myocardial infarction. They suggest that patients taking these agents before admission to hospital with myocardial infarction have a significant survival advantage at 28 days, which may be due to a reduction in infarct size.

[Beta blockers and anesthesia]

Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (BB) demonstrate a competitive antagonism with endogenous catecholamines. Beta-1 receptor blockade mediates the depressive action on contractility, heart rate and atrio-ventricular conduction. Beta-2 receptor blockade mediates vascular, bronchial and uterine smooth muscle constriction. BB with beta-1 selective and intrinsec sympathomimetic activity do not increase systemic vascular resistance. BB are mostly used to treat ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and arrhythmias. Bradycardia, hypotension and bronchospasm are the main hazards in BB treated patients undergoing anaesthesia. However giving BB with premedication to patients taking usely this treatment allows better perioperative haemodynamic stability and avoids rebound effect. Experimentally, oxprenolol reverses regional dysfunction in ischaemic myocardium under halothane anaesthesia. During and after anaesthesia, intravenous (i.v.) BB must be used with caution to treat hypertension associated with tachycardia. In controlled hypotension, i.v. BB potentialise other agents. In phaechromocytoma surgery, alpha-blocking drugs are essential but additional BB can control tachycardia successfully. In coronary artery bypass surgery, giving BB prior to induction decreases cardiac enzymes serum levels. Esmolol, a new ultra-short-acting BB, would control perioperative tachycardia and hypertension without risk of prolonged cardiac depression.

Beta-adrenergic blockade and calcium channel blockade in myocardial infarction

Because of their hemodynamic and antiarrhythmic actions, beta-adrenergic blockers and calcium-entry blockers have been suggested for use in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) for reducing infarct size, preventing ventricular ectopy, and for prolonging life in survivors of acute MI. Experimental studies have suggested their usefulness in these areas. Clinical studies have demonstrated a role for beta-blockers in the hyperacute phase of MI, and in longterm treatment of infarct survivors. Calcium channel blockers appear to have somewhat less utility in patients with Q wave MIs, but may have an important role in therapy of the non-Q wave infarct.

Myocardial salvage after regional beta-adrenergic blockade

The aim of the study was to determine whether regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the coronary sinus limited myocardial damage after coronary artery occlusion in the canine model. Accordingly, open-chest anesthetized dogs were randomly allocated to one of three groups: a control group and groups treated with propranolol (in doses of 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mg/kg) given either intravenously or via the coronary sinus. The hypoperfused zone (i.e., risk area) and the extent of myocardial damage were assessed by autoradiography and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, respectively. Myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone was 84 +/- 5% in the control group (n = 9) and 78 +/- 7% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 63 +/- 6% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.05), and 62 +/- 7% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.02) in the groups receiving intravenous propranolol and 73 +/- 6% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 58 +/- 7% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.01), and 44 +/- 9% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.001) in groups receiving propranolol via the cardiac veins. There was a significant enhancement of myocardial salvage with increasing doses of propranolol delivered via the cardiac veins (linear regression trend, p less than 0.05). In contrast, myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone remained comparable with propranolol doses of 0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg administered intravenously (linear regression trend, NS).

IN CONCLUSION

(1) regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the cardiac veins afforded significant myocardial salvage and (2) the regional administration of propranolol resulted in significant reduction of myocardial damage in a dose-dependent fashion.

Body temperature in acute myocardial infarction and its relation to early intervention with metoprolol

In a subsample of 223 patients participating in a double-blind trial with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction, body temperature during the first 5 days in hospital was recorded. Patients developing infarction had a mean temperature of 37.3 degrees C compared with 36.8 degrees C for those with no infarction (P less than 0.001). A positive association was observed between enzyme-estimated infarct size and body temperature (P less than 0.001). Patients given metoprolol had a mean temperature of 37.0 degrees C as compared with 37.2 degrees C in those given placebo (P = 0.03). The most marked difference between metoprolol and placebo was observed among those treated very early. We conclude that early treatment with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction appears to lower body temperature during the following days. This might reflect limitation of the infarct size.

According to MIAMI and ISIS-I trials, can a general recommendation be given for beta blockers in acute myocardial infarction?

The goal of early intervention of acute coronary occlusion by beta blockers is to reduce ultimate infarct size and to consequently reduce morbidity and mortality. Until 1986 small early intervention trials suggested that infarct size may be reduced by 25% if treatment was started within 6 to 10 hours after the onset of symptoms. At this time, an average of 80% of the infarct is fully developed. On the basis of previous trials, the reduction of infarct size has been associated with improvement of symptoms, prevention of infarct development, reduced occurrence of arrhythmias and reinfarctions, and earlier discharge from the hospital. Although the trials suggested some benefit in mortality, this issue has not been solved. The MIAMI trial randomized 5778 patients to blind treatment with metoprolol or placebo. ISIS-I randomized 16,027 patients to atenolol with an open label. No titration of the effect on lowering myocardial oxygen requirement was attempted. Both studies included less than 25% of all eligible patients. Exclusions were chiefly due to current beta blocker or calcium blocker treatment. Thus, the results obtained concern only a selected group of patients. In MIAMI only 15% received treatment within 6 hours, while in ISIS 38% were treated within 4 hours. It is therefore likely that in most patients the infarcts were completed before intervention was started. Thus, the two trials did not differentiate between primary and secondary effects on the acute myocardial infarct. Mortality was reduced by 13% (NS) and 15% (p less than 0.04), respectively, in MIAMI and ISIS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Propranolol inhibition of the neutral phospholipases A of rat heart mitochondria, sarcoplasmic reticulum and cytosol

Membrane damage caused by phospholipase A action is thought to be an important factor in ischemic myocardial injury. Propranolol has been shown previously to have beneficial effects in both animal experiments and clinical trials, and it has membrane-stabilizing properties in vitro. To investigate the possibility that these effects might be due, in part, to effects on phospholipases, we determined the effects of propranolol on rat heart phospholipases A at physiological pH using small unilamellar liposomes of di[1-14C]oleoylphosphatidylcholine as substrate. Propranolol inhibited heart phospholipases A in vitro. The concentration required to give 50% inhibition was 0.2 mM for the mitochondrial and cytosolic phospholipases A and 2.9 mM for sarcoplasmic reticulum phospholipase A. The binding of [4-3H]propranolol to fresh membrane preparations was studied using an ultracentrifugation method. Propranolol bound readily to both membrane fractions in vitro with no significant difference in the saturation number (0.20 to 0.28 mol drug per mol phospholipid) but the association constant, KA, was higher for mitochondrial membranes (3760 +/- 350) than for the sarcoplasmic reticulum (2190 +/- 390). Our results show that propranolol inhibited heart phospholipases A in vitro at physiological pH. The mitochondrial and cytosolic phospholipases A were more susceptible to inhibition than the phospholipase A of sarcoplasmic reticulum. Propranolol bound to mitochondria and sarcoplasmic reticulum in vitro, suggesting the possibility that propranolol binding to heart membranes in vivo could result in drug concentrations in these membranes high enough to inhibit phospholipase A. This could represent an additional mechanism by which propranolol exerts beneficial effects in myocardial ischemia.

Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials

Meta-analysis is an important method of bridging the gap between undersized randomized control trials and the treatment of patients. However, as in any retrospective study, the opportunities for bias to distort the results are widespread. Attempts must be made to introduce the controls found in prospective studies by blinding the selection of papers and extraction of data and making blinded duplicate determinations. Informal and personalized methods of obtaining data are probably more liable to error and bias than employing only published data. Publication bias is a serious problem requiring further research. There also need to be more comparisons of meta-analysed small studies with large co-operative trials.

Infarct size--can it be measured or modified in humans?

Despite more than 15 years of intensive experimental and clinical research in the general area of limiting infarct size, no treatment has been shown to be so efficacious and relatively free of side effects that its routine use can be recommended. In addition, there is no ideal means of measuring infarct size as yet. However, considerable progress has been made in understanding mechanisms responsible for irreversible cellular injury and in identifying factors and anatomic alterations responsible for or contributing to the development of transmural (Q wave) and non-transmural (non-Q wave) myocardial infarcts. Interventions are available that are capable of causing rapid coronary thrombolysis, and techniques are becoming available tht have increasing power to size myocardial infarcts and estimate both segmental and ventricular function. Experimental studies have also suggested a potential benefit from a combination of reperfusion therapy with selected pharmacologic intervention in reducing infarct size and preserving ventricular function. It seems likely that this general area will remain an intensive area of clinical research in the immediate future.

Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction

The time from onset of symptoms to arrival in the hospital emergency room (ER) was studied in 778 patients randomized into a study of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) size limitation. Patients at relatively high risk of death after AMI (including those with preexisting diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension or congestive heart failure), women and older patients arrived significantly later in the ER than did patients without these characteristics. A significantly higher mortality rate was observed in patients who arrived late, i.e., those who arrived more than 2 hours after the onset of chest pain, even though patients with hemodynamic compromise (bradycardia, hypotension) tended to arrive earlier. The difference in long-term mortality between those who arrived early (within 2 hours of onset of chest pain) and those who arrived late was accounted for by the baseline differences between these 2 groups. These baseline differences may influence the effects of early interventions in AMI. In addition, these findings have implications for education of high-risk patients who could benefit the most from aggressive early intervention.

Management of acute myocardial infarction

This article presents plans of therapy based on current knowledge of pathophysiologic mechanisms, taking into consideration the rapid changes in availability of new drugs (or new experiences with old drugs) and new therapeutic interventions. Persistence of ischemic pain in the acute phase, or its recurrence during early convalescence, is a signal of a high-risk state for additional coronary events, and aggressive measures are required to prevent them. The indications, and the role of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the treatment of left ventricular failure and/or hypotension, are discussed.

Infarct size reduction: a review of the clinical trials

The most important finding to emerge from this review of experimental and clinical studies is that the earlier therapy is begun after the onset of symptoms of acute MI, the greater the potential for reduction of infarct size and possibly mortality. It is difficult to define a precise time after which therapy would not have an effect, since the clinical trials for each drug group vary significantly in respect to time of therapy initiation. In experimental studies, major salvage of ischemic myocardium occurs when the drug is given within two hours of coronary artery occlusion. If drug therapy is begun four to six hours postocclusion, then only minor or no reductions in infarct size will occur. The ability of any drug or intervention to reduce infarct size in humans would be optimized if therapy were begun less than four hours of onset of symptoms. With the realization of the wavefront phenomenon and the potential salvage of myocardium at risk with reperfusion, the introduction of reperfusion in the clinical setting with thrombolytic agents or other procedures becomes highly desirable. Clot-selective thrombolytic agents, such as tissue plasminogen activator, diminish the adverse effects and high costs of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or PTCA. Consequently, it is probable that the initial procedure of choice would be the use of clot-selective thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy only lyses thrombi and does not affect the underlying causes of the coronary artery occlusion. Therefore, therapy to reduce the chances of reinfarction and death must also be initiated. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, in selected patients, should reduce the reocclusion rate. Beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents appear to be an excellent therapy for reducing mortality when administered chronically; these agents reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and reverse the imbalance between oxygen supply and oxygen demand caused by activation of the sympathetic nervous system and actions of catecholamines. Since thrombus formation has occurred at least once in patients who survive an MI, it is probable that the conditions for thrombus formation still exist. Therefore, institution of antiplatelet aggregating drugs, such as aspirin, would seem to be an appropriate prophylactic regimen. Beta blockers and possibly nitroglycerin have desirable effects when thrombolysis is unavailable. The efficacy of calcium-channel blocking agents on reduction of infarct size appears to be limited, although in the setting of stable and unstable angina postinfarction, these agents can play an important role.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Propranolol in acute myocardial infarction: the MILIS experience

The results of the propranolol limb of the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size are reviewed. A total of 269 patients, who presented with symptoms and electrocardiographic signs suggesting acute myocardial infarction were randomized to acute intravenous and subsequent oral therapy with propranolol (n = 134) or placebo (n = 135). Eligibility for acute beta-blocker therapy was determined on the basis of readily available, noninvasive tests. Therapy was started at an average time of 8.5 hours after onset of symptoms. The full induction dose of intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) was tolerated by 90% of treated patients, and oral maintenance therapy was being continued in 82% of treated patients on the second hospital day. There was a significant reduction in heart rate throughout maintenance therapy with propranolol, which continued through the tenth hospital day. There was no significant difference in the incidence of congestive heart failure between propranolol- and placebo-treated groups. There was also no significant difference between the 2 groups in infarct size estimated by measurement of serum CK-MB, planimetry of infarct area on technetium pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams or R-wave measurements in patients with transmural anterior and inferior infarcts. There was no significant difference in mortality between the 2 groups during an average of 36 months' follow-up. Although propranolol can be administered safely to patients with acute myocardial infarction who are selected on the basis of simple clinical criteria, there is no evidence of reduction of infarct size when beta blockade is begun 8.5 hours after the onset of symptoms.

Importance of heart rate in determining beta-blocker efficacy in acute and long-term acute myocardial infarction intervention trials

Heart rate after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an index of late mortality. The hypothesis--that the potential beneficial effect of beta-blocking drugs after an AMI is quantitatively dependent on the reduction of heart rate obtained by such treatment--was examined by reviewing available data from acute and long-term intervention trials. Only properly randomized and double-blind trials were considered. In acute intervention trials only patients who received treatment within 12 hours after onset of pain were included. In early intervention trials there was a close relation between the reduction in heart rate and infarct size as determined by accumulated creatine kinase release (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). A reduction in heart rate of at least 15 beats/min during infarct evolution was associated with a reduction of infarct size between 25 and 30%. The data suggest that a reduction in heart rate less than 8 beats/min has no effect or may actually increase infarct size. Comparison of post-AMI trials indicated a relation between the actual reduction of resting heart rate and percentage of reduction in mortality obtained in each trial (r = 0.60, p less than 0.05). An almost similar relation was demonstrated between the reduction in resting heart rate and nonfatal reinfarctions (r = 0.59, p less than 0.05). Confounding properties of a beta blocker, such as intrinsic sympathomimetic activity or prolongation of the QT interval, may reduce its efficacy. These results strongly suggest that the beneficial effect of beta blockers is related to a quantitative reduction in heart rate, probably indicating an antiischemic effect. However, the data do not exclude the possibility that other protective mechanisms may be operative.

Effects of propranolol on myocardial damage resulting from coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion

To evaluate the effects of propranolol on myocardial metabolism after coronary reperfusion, serial measurements of myocardial creatine kinase (CK) and calcium (Ca) contents and CK and lactic acid (LA) concentrations in coronary sinus blood were carried out in 33 open-chest dogs. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 60 minutes and was then reopened. Twelve of the dogs were given propranolol before occlusion. Reperfusion for 30 minutes in dogs with and without propranolol pretreatment resulted in reduced myocardial CK in the ischemic region and rapidly elevated plasma CK and LA. However, when compared with the control group, the propranolol-treated group showed smaller changes in myocardial CK and plasma LA. Myocardial Ca in the ischemic region was significantly higher than that in the nonischemic region in the control group, but not in the propranolol-treated group. It was concluded that propranolol was protective against myocardial damage resulting from coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion.

The influence of early intervention in acute myocardial infarction on long-term mortality and morbidity as assessed in the Göteborg metoprolol trial

The mortality and morbidity were assessed during a 2-year follow-up in an acute intervention trial in suspected acute myocardial infarction with metoprolol (a selective beta 1-blocker). On admission to the trial, the 1395 participating patients were randomly allocated to metoprolol or placebo for 3 months. Thereafter, if there was no contraindication, patients with infarction and/or angina pectoris were continued on metoprolol for 2 years. A lower mortality was observed after 3 months in patients randomised to metoprolol. The difference remained after 2 years. The difference in 2-year mortality rate was restricted to patients randomised early after onset of pain. Late infarction was observed more often in the placebo group during the first 3 months. When the two groups thereafter were treated similarly, the difference successively declined and did not remain after 2 years. A similar incidence of angina pectoris was observed in the two groups at each check up. During the early recovery period, more patients in the metoprolol group returned to work. No such difference was observed later on.

Beta-blockers, plasma total creatine kinase and creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme, and the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage

Under double-blind randomized conditions the effects of early intervention with oral propranolol or a placebo were studied in 51 cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Eleven out of 23 patients randomly assigned to placebo had a poor outcome at 6 months, while 2 of the 28 patients randomly assigned to propranolol had a poor outcome (p less than 0.001). Patients with a poor outcome on the placebo had significantly higher mean plasma total creatine kinase levels (742 IU, standard error of the mean +/- 233 IU) on the fifth day after subarachnoid hemorrhage than patients with a good outcome on the placebo (108 +/- 20 IU; p less than 0.05). A raised plasma creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme was associated with a particularly poor outlook in patients receiving the placebo, in contrast to those taking a beta-blocker. Clinical outcome and plasma creatine kinase levels in patients taking atenolol (hydrophilic) were similar to those observed in patients receiving propranolol.

Early use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents in acute myocardial infarction

Of recent interest is the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Acute use of beta-blockers refers to initiation of therapy within hours following the onset of symptoms suggestive of AMI. The proposed goal of therapy is to alter the infarction process to improve mortality. Because of the hyperadrenergic activity present in patients during an infarction, beta-blockers are theoretically an attractive therapeutic intervention because of their sympatholytic properties. Acute use of beta-blockers has been shown to limit infarct size, as determined by cardiac enzyme activity, and reduce the incidence of major ventricular arrhythmias. Beta-blockers may also prevent infarction in patients with symptoms suggestive of infarction. However, the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents has not been shown to reduce short-term (less than or equal to 30 d) mortality. In view of this fact, the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents cannot be recommended.

Differences in haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs between stable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction

Theoretically the increased sympathoadrenal activity following acute myocardial infarction might augment the haemodynamic impact of beta-adrenoceptor blockade. To evaluate this question 32 haemodynamic studies were performed to compare the effects of equivalent beta-blocking doses of propranolol (8 mg i.v.) and pindolol (0.8 mg i.v.) in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (A.M.I.) or stable coronary artery disease (and a presumptive low sympathetic state). In stable coronary artery disease there were clear differences between the haemodynamic impact of propranolol and pindolol. Propranolol decreased both heart rate (delta HR -7 beat/min) and cardiac index (delta CI -0.4 l/min/m2), with an increased pulmonary artery occluded pressure (delta PAOP +4 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance index (delta SVRI +358 dyn X s X cm-5 m2). However an equivalent beta-blocking dose of pindolol increased PAOP (delta PAOP +3 mmHg) leaving other variables unchanged. These differential actions of propranolol and pindolol have previously been ascribed to the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (I.S.A.) of pindolol maintaining cardiac pumping function in a low sympathetic state. In contrast following myocardial infarction, both drugs reduced cardiac index to a significantly greater extent compared with stable coronary artery disease (delta CI propranolol -0.81/min/m2; pindolol -0.4 l/min/m2; p less than 0.05); propranolol also reduced the systemic arterial blood pressure (delta systolic -10 mmHg; delta mean -5 mmHg; p less than 0.05). The haemodynamic relevance of the I.S.A. of pindolol appeared attenuated following A.M.I. These data are compatible with experimental evidence of sympathetic nervous activation following coronary occlusion; the resulting hyperadrenergic state appears to condition an augmented haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs irrespective of their ancillary pharmacological properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)