Beneficial effects of hydralazine on rest and exercise hemodynamics in patients with chronic severe aortic insufficiency

Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Regurgitation and Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HT) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and might precipitate pathology of the aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of HT with aortic dysfunction (including both aortic regurgitation and stenosis) and the impact of antihypertensive treatment on the natural course of underlying aortic disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature for all relevant articles assessing the correlation between HT and phenotype of aortic disease.

RESULTS

Co-existence of HT with aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients and predicts a worse prognosis. Certain antihypertensive agents may improve haemodynamic parameters (aortic jet velocity, aortic regurgitation volume) and remodeling of the left ventricle, but there is no strong evidence of benefit regarding clinical outcomes. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, among other vasodilators, are well-tolerated in aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Several lines of evidence support a detrimental association between HT and aortic valve disease. Therefore, HT should be promptly treated in aortic valvulopathy. Despite conventional wisdom, specific vasodilators can be used with caution in aortic stenosis.

Valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management

Valvular heart disease (VHD) encompasses a number of common cardiovascular conditions that account for 10% to 20% of all cardiac surgical procedures in the United States. A better understanding of the natural history coupled with the major advances in diagnostic imaging, interventional cardiology, and surgical approaches have resulted in accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of patients for therapeutic interventions. A thorough understanding of the various valvular disorders is important to aid in the management of patients with VHD. Appropriate work-up for patients with VHD includes a thorough history for evaluation of causes and symptoms, accurate assessment of the severity of the valvular abnormality by examination, appropriate diagnostic testing, and accurate quantification of the severity of valve dysfunction and therapeutic interventions, if necessary. It is also important to understand the role of the therapeutic interventions vs the natural history of the disease in the assessment of outcomes. Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is no longer recommended unless the patient has a history of endocarditis or a prosthetic valve.

Hydralazine in chronic CHF

In summary, there investigations indicate that oral hydralazine produces beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic CHF. These favorable hemodynamic response are observed in the presence or absence of mechanical defects, such as mitral or aortic regurgitation. The predominant hemodynamic effects of hydralazine are substantial increase in CO and SV with decreased systemic vascular resistance. These investigations further suggest that hydralazine therapy not only improves resting cardiac performance, but also cardiac performance during exercise. There is also evidence that improved cardiac performance is sustained at least in some patients during maintenance hydralazine therapy. The impact of hydralazine therapy on the long term prognosis of patients with refractory CHF, however, remains unknown. Nevertheless, the preliminary retrospective studies suggest that in certain subsets of patients with severe chronic CHF, such therapy may provide a better prognosis compared to that expected with conventional therapy.

Vasodilator therapy in patients with aortic insufficiency: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of vasodilators to improve long-term outcomes in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI) is controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant clinical trials on asymptomatic patients with chronic AI of at least moderate severity. We included those studies that involved long-term vasodilator therapy (including hydralazine, calcium-channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and assessed either hemodynamic and structural parameters or clinical outcomes. Data on patient demographics, study protocols, and outcomes were abstracted.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 544 asymptomatic patients with chronic AI were identified. Treatment duration with vasodilators ranged from 12 weeks to 7 years. Of these, 8 studies compared vasodilators with placebo or no therapy, with 5 demonstrating improvements in at least 1 hemodynamic or structural parameter with vasodilators and 3 showing little or no apparent benefit. The remaining 2 studies directly compared outcomes between 2 different vasodilators. Both of these studies demonstrated greater improvements in hemodynamic and structural parameters with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors compared with hydralazine and nifedipine. Clinical outcomes were primarily reported in only 2 of the 10 studies. Although one study suggested that the use of vasodilators slowed the rate of progression to surgery for aortic valve replacement, another showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasodilators inconsistently improve hemodynamic and structural parameters in asymptomatic patients with chronic AI. In addition, the impact of vasodilators on clinical outcomes is largely uncertain and requires further study.

Are vasodilators still indicated in the treatment of severe aortic regurgitation?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a valve disease that causes severe complications and reduces life expectancy. Surgical correction is required in the late stages of the disease. In less advanced forms, treatment with vasodilators is a consideration. The available evidence suggests that this type of treatment has a favorable effect on the consequences of AR, particularly left ventricular remodeling. However, the impact of vasodilators on clinical endpoints complicating the course of AR remains in doubt. The limited evidence supporting or opposing the utilization of vasodilators in AR hinders drawing firm conclusions and emphasizes the process of individualized interpretation of the clinical presentation of patients with the disease.

Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy can reduce the left ventricular volume and mass and improve left ventricular performance in patients with aortic regurgitation. Accordingly, it has been suggested that such therapy may reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 95 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function to receive open-label nifedipine (20 mg every 12 hours), open-label enalapril (20 mg per day), or no treatment (control group) to identify the possible beneficial effects of vasodilator therapy on left ventricular function and the need for aortic-valve replacement.

RESULTS

After a mean of seven years of follow-up, the rate of aortic-valve replacement was similar among the groups: 39 percent in the control group, 50 percent in the enalapril group, and 41 percent in the nifedipine group (P=0.62). In addition, there were no significant differences among the groups in aortic regurgitant volume, left ventricular size, left ventricular mass, mean wall stress, or ejection fraction. One year after valve replacement, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter had decreased to a similar degree among the patients who underwent surgery in each of the three groups, and all the patients had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine or enalapril did not reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, such therapy did not reduce the aortic regurgitant volume, decrease the size of the left ventricle, or improve left ventricular function.

Aortic Regurgitation

Left ventricular (LV) systolic function is an important determinant of long-term prognosis in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Impaired LV systolic function identifies a group of patients who are at risk of developing postoperative congestive heart failure and death after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Hence, asymptomatic patients with definite evidence of impaired LV function should undergo operation without waiting for the development of symptoms or more severe LV dysfunction. Among asymptomatic patients with normal LV systolic function (normal ejection fraction), prognosis is excellent, and fewer than 5% per year require surgery because of symptom development or LV dysfunction. Patients likely to require surgery can be identified on the basis of age, severity of LV dilatation, and progressive increase in LV dimensions or decrease in resting ejection fraction during the course of serial follow-up studies. Afterload-reducing therapy in asymptomatic patients with severe AR and normal LV function has beneficial hemodynamic effects; chronic therapy may reduce the likelihood of symptoms or LV systolic dysfunction. Aortic valve replacement should be performed once significant symptoms develop. In the absence of important symptoms, the operation should also be performed in patients with AR who manifest consistent and reproducible evidence of either LV contractile dysfunction at rest or extreme LV dilatation. Noninvasive imaging should play a major role in evaluation. An important clinical decision--such as recommending AVR in the asymptomatic patient--should not be based on a single echocardiographic or radionuclide angiographic measurement. When these data consistently indicate impaired contractile function at rest or extreme LV dilatation on repeat measurement, however, operation is indicated in the asymptomatic patient. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of irreversible LV dysfunction in these patients and enhance long-term postoperative survival.

Vasodilatation with felodipine in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Afterload reduction decreases volume overload on the left ventricle and may thereby delay the need for valve replacement in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation. The aims of this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were to examine short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of felodipine in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to an intravenous infusion of either felodipine 0. 3 mg or placebo followed by 3 months' treatment with felodipine 10 mg or placebo orally once daily. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, immediately after intravenous treatment, and after 3 months of oral treatment.

RESULTS

Intravenous felodipine caused a statistically significant reduction in the systemic vascular resistance from (mean +/- SD) 1160 +/- 400 to 970 +/- 320 dynes. s. cm(-5) (P <.05), in the regurgitant volume index from 1.5 +/- 0.8 to 1.3 +/- 0.8 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05), and in the regurgitant fraction from 0.31 +/- 0.15 to 0.26 +/- 0.14 (P <.05). The forward cardiac output index increased significantly from 3.2 +/- 0.9 to 3.5 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05). Three months of oral treatment with felodipine caused a corresponding but more pronounced decrease in systemic vascular resistance of 880 +/- 330 dynes. s. cm(-5) (P <.05), regurgitant volume index of 1.2 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05), and regurgitant fraction 0.25 +/- 0.11 (P <.05), whereas the forward cardiac output index increased to 3.6 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05). No significant changes were found in the placebo group. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction remained unaffected by treatment, but compared with the placebo group left ventricular myocardial mass decreased significantly from 137 +/- 24 to 132 +/- 21 g. m(-2) (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

In chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation, felodipine causes beneficial hemodynamic effects that may postpone the need for valve replacement.

Current Concepts in the Management of Heart Failure

Objective:

To give an overview of the epidemiology, etiology, and symptoms and signs of heart failure (HF), and the role of various therapeutic modalities that influence functional status, morbidity, and mortality in HF.

Data Sources:

Computerized search of the MEDLINE database (1976–1998) and review chapters from medical textbooks.

Data Extraction:

Clinical trials evaluating the effect of drugs on morbidity and mortality of patients with HF.

Data Synthesis:

HF is a clinical syndrome with high prevalence and mortality. The treatment approach varies depending on the etiology and type of HF. Several large-scale clinical trials with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors demonstrate improved survival and reduced hospitalization in patients with all degrees of HF. Several other trials report similar benefits in postmyocardial infarction patients with HF. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agents have also been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with HF and may be used in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors. Therapy with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate also improves exercise tolerance as well as survival in patients with HF. The combination of these agents with ACE inhibitors may be useful in patients who remain symptomatic while taking ACE inhibitors. Such second-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as amlodipine have also been shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, and survival in nonischemic patients. Diuretics are effective in reducing the symptoms of HF resulting from fluid overload. Inotropic drugs such as digoxin may improve symptoms and reduce hospitalization for patients with HF but do not reduce overall mortality. Long-term, continuous use of inotropic agents, such as amrinone, milrinone, dobutamine, and high-dose vesnarinone, may improve quality of life but increase mortality in HF. Beta-blockers, particularly Carvedilol, with vasodilating properties demonstrate positive survival results in patients with mild-to-moderate HF.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors are the initial drug of choice in the treatment of HF; however, angiotensin II receptor antagonists may be used in patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Diuretics are useful mainly to control the fluid overload in HF. Digoxin is helpful in patients with atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular response and in patients who are resistant to ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy is valuable in patients whose symptoms cannot be controlled with optimal doses of diuretics, digoxin, and ACE inhibitors. Careful use of newer beta-blockers, with optimal titration of diuretics, in mild-to-moderate HF may help prolong life. Newer dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers may be beneficial in nonischemic patients with HF.

Chronic aortic regurgitation. Role of medical therapy and optimal timing for surgery

Aortic valve replacement should be performed once significant symptoms develop. Lacking important symptoms, operation should also be performed in patients with aortic regurgitation who manifest consistent and reproducible evidence of either LV contractile dysfunction at rest or extreme LV dilation. Noninvasive imaging techniques should play a major role in this evaluation. An important clinical decision, such as recommending aortic valve replacement in the asymptomatic patient, should not be based on a single echocardiographic or radionuclide angiographic measurement alone. When these data consistently indicate impaired contractile function at rest or extreme LV dilation on repeat measurements, however, operation is indicated in the asymptomatic patient. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of irreversible LV dysfunction in these patients and enhance long-term postoperative survival.

Assessment of hemodynamic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in chronic aortic regurgitation by using velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging

Long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has beneficial effects in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation by reducing left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction. Velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging can directly measure antegrade (forward stroke volume) and retrograde blood flow (regurgitant volume) in the ascending aorta. Velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging was used in 9 patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (regurgitant fraction 49% +/- 17%) to measure regurgitant fraction, regurgitant volume, and forward stroke volume at baseline and 3 months after therapy with enalapril (mean dose 29 +/- 13 mg). Ten additional patients with aortic regurgitation without any drug therapy served as a control group. In the treatment group, systolic blood pressure slightly decreased from 132 +/- 20 mm Hg to 121 +/- 14 mm Hg (p = not significant), whereas diastolic blood pressure and heart rate (beats per minute) remained unchanged. Regurgitant fraction decreased in 6 patients (responders) from 49% +/- 19% to 39% +/- 20% (percentage change 24% +/- 14%, p = 0.002) and was unchanged in 3 patients (nonresponder, 49% +/- 19% vs 51% +/- 16%; p = not significant). In the responder group, forward stroke volume increased from 128 +/- 32 ml to 148 +/- 57 ml, whereas regurgitant volume remained unchanged (67 +/- 40 ml vs 65 +/- 51 ml). At baseline, the responder group had a significant higher total vascular resistance than the nonresponder group (998 +/- 538 dyne.sec.cm-5 vs 625 +/- 214 dyne.sec.cm-5; p < 0.05). With enalapril treatment, total vascular resistance in the responder group tended to decrease (891 +/- 576 dyne.sec.cm-5), but slightly increased in the nonresponder group (679 +/- 276 dyne.sec.cm-5). The control group showed no changes in regurgitant fraction, regurgitant volume, forward stroke volume, and total vascular resistance at follow-up.

Vasodilator therapy in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation: enalapril versus hydralazine therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study attempted to evaluate the long-term efficacy of enalapril versus hydralazine therapy on left ventricular volume, mass and function as well as on the renin-angiotensin system in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation.

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that early administration of a vasodilator drug might be able to reduce left ventricular dilation and mass expansion. Because the renin-angiotensin system may be activated in chronic aortic regurgitation, early enalapril therapy might be beneficial.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1993, 76 asymptomatic nonrheumatic patients with mild to severe chronic aortic regurgitation were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing enalapril with hydralazine. All patients underwent serial noninvasive studies. Seventy patients completed the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

At 1 year, patients receiving enalapril had a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes (124 +/- 15 vs. 108 +/- 17 ml/m2, p < 0.01; 50 +/- 12 vs. 40 +/- 14 ml/m2, p < 0.01, respectively) and mass index (131 +/- 16 vs. 113 +/- 19 g/m2, p < 0.01), whereas hydralazine therapy showed no significant changes. Both regimens not only had a significant reduction in left ventricular mean wall stress but also had a mild increase in exercise duration. Only enalapril therapy achieved a significant inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, in contrast to hydralazine therapy. Moreover, the multiple r2 value from the analysis for end-diastolic volume index using the two variables of age and treatment drugs was 72.1% (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both regimens decrease left ventricular mean wall stress. Enalapril therapy achieves significant left ventricular mass regression, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index reduction and renin-angiotensin system suppression. These findings suggest that early unloading enalapril therapy has the potential to favorably influence the natural history of chronic aortic regurgitation.

Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy with nifedipine reduces left ventricular volume and mass and increases the ejection fraction in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

To assess whether vasodilator therapy reduces or delays the need for valve replacement, we randomly assigned 143 asymptomatic patients with isolated, severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function to receive either nifedipine (20 mg twice daily, 69 patients) or digoxin (0.25 mg daily, 74 patients).

RESULTS

By actuarial analysis, we determined that after six years a mean (+/- SD) of 34 +/- 6 percent of the patients in the digoxin group had undergone valve replacement, as compared with only 15 +/- 3 percent of those in the nifedipine group (P < 0.001). In the digoxin group, valve replacement (in a total of 20 patients) was performed because of left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50 percent) in 75 percent, left ventricular dysfunction plus symptoms in 10 percent, and symptoms alone in 15 percent. In the nifedipine group, all six patients who underwent valve replacement did so because of the development of left ventricular dysfunction. In addition, all the patients in both groups who underwent aortic-valve replacement had an increase of 15 percent or more in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. After aortic-valve replacement, 12 of the 16 patients (75 percent) in the digoxin group and all six patients in the nifedipine group who had had an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction before surgery had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine reduces or delays the need for aortic-valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function.

Comparison of single-dose nifedipine and captopril for chronic severe aortic regurgitation

The effects of a single dose of either nifedipine 20 mg (n = 10) or captopril 50 mg (n = 10) were compared in 20 patients with symptomatic, chronic severe aortic regurgitation using angiography and micromanometer left ventricular pressure measurements. At 90 minutes, mean arterial pressure was reduced comparably after both drugs (86 +/- 15 to 76 +/- 18 mm Hg for nifedipine vs 95 +/- 19 to 77 +/- 18 mm Hg for captopril, p = NS between groups by analysis of variance), as was wedge pressure (11 +/- 5 to 9 +/- 4 mm Hg vs 13 +/- 9 to 9 +/- 5 mm Hg for captopril). Systemic vascular resistance was reduced more (p = 0.01) after nifedipine than after captopril (1,549 +/- 468 to 1,067 +/- 291 dynes s cm-5 vs 1,632 +/- 559 to 1,436 +/- 392 dynes s cm-5). Heart rate declined after captopril (84 +/- 14/min to 75 +/- 15/min, p = 0.002) but not after nifedipine (78 +/- 13 min to 80 +/- 14 min). Forward stroke volume increased after nifedipine (58 +/- 14 to 70 +/- 16 ml, p < 0.001) but not after captopril (58 +/- 17 to 59 +/- 16 ml). Thus, cardiac output increased after nifedipine (4.4 +/- 0.9 to 5.5 +/- 1.2 liters/min, p < 0.001) but decreased after captopril (4.8 +/- 1.2 to 4.3 +/- 1.0, p = 0.004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of long-term vasodilator therapy on electrocardiographic abnormalities in chronic aortic regurgitation

Electrocardiographic abnormalities develop in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Although vasodilator drugs may reduce left ventricular (LV) volume overload, the effects of such therapy on electrocardiographic abnormalities have not been previously evaluated. Accordingly, electrocardiograms were analyzed before and after double-blind, randomized administration of either hydralazine or placebo in 54 patients with chronic AR. These patients were without limiting symptoms and had preserved ejection fraction on entry in the study. The magnitude of ST-segment depression and Romhilt-Estes point score for LV hypertrophy were assessed. Baseline ST depression and LV hypertrophy scores in the placebo and hydralazine groups were not significantly different. At follow-up, after a mean of 19 +/- 6 months, there was a significant reduction in ST depression in patients taking hydralazine (n = 28) compared with patients given placebo (n = 26): -0.023 +/- 0.044 vs 0.029 +/- 0.055 mV, respectively (p = 0.0001); and in the LV hypertrophy score (-1.1 +/- 2.2 vs 0.9 +/- 2.3 points, respectively; p = 0.002). Hydralazine-treated patients also had significant decreases in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes, and a significant increase in ejection fraction. These results suggest that such vasodilator therapy may be beneficial in patients with chronic AR.

Valvular heart disease. A correctable cause of congestive heart failure

Surgical repair of mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves and balloon valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis are being done more and more often. These complex procedures require accurate and high-quality imaging techniques to guide the physician in decision making before surgery and in assessment of success during surgery. Dr Currie describes the use of echocardiography in diagnosis and management of patients with various forms of valvular heart disease.

Long-term nifedipine unloading therapy in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation

Vasodilating agents acutely reduce regurgitant volume and improve left ventricular performance in aortic regurgitation, but more information is necessary about their long-term efficacy. To evaluate the effects of 12 months of therapy with nifedipine, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 72 asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation. At 12 months, patients receiving nifedipine had a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (110 +/- 19 versus 136 +/- 22 ml/m2, p less than 0.01) and mass (115 +/- 19 versus 142 +/- 16 g/m2, p less than 0.01) measured by two-dimensional echocardiography. They also had a reduction in left ventricular mean wall stress (360 +/- 27 versus 479 +/- 36 kdyne/cm2, p less than 0.001) and an increase in ejection fraction (72 +/- 8% versus 60 +/- 6%, p less than 0.05). These data show that the long-term unloading action of nifedipine is able to reverse left ventricular dilation and hypertrophy and suggest that such therapy has the potential to delay the need for valve replacement in asymptomatic patients.

Vasodilator therapy without converting-enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure--usefulness and limitations

Despite a well-established rationale for pharmacologically induced arterial and venous vasodilatation in congestive heart failure, the clinical usefulness of long-term vasodilator therapy without concomitant converting-enzyme inhibition generally has been disappointing. With the exception of nitrates and, possibly, the combination of nitrates and hydralazine, the use of converting-enzyme inhibitors in many aspects appears preferable in the majority of patients. This article reviews the pathophysiology of inappropriate vasoconstriction in heart failure, the cellular mode of action of the various vasodilators, hemodynamic effects with respect to the peripheral site of action, clinical usefulness and limitations of different vasodilators, and the various determinants of clinical efficacy. Finally, an attempt is made to assess when and how to introduce vasodilator treatment with and without concomitant ACE inhibition.

Effect of digoxin and vasodilators on left ventricular function in aortic regurgitation

In order to assess the relative value of digoxin, nifedipine and hydralazine on left ventricular performance at rest and during exercise, we studied 10 men with moderately severe chronic aortic regurgitation using two-dimensional echocardiography. Digoxin after one month at therapeutic serum levels increased resting ejection fraction as compared to control [0.54 +/- 0.08 (SD) vs 0.47 +/- 0.08, respectively, P less than 0.03]. Ejection fraction decreased during exercise but the difference between digoxin and control was maintained. Stroke volume also was higher on digoxin than control at rest (93 +/- 15 vs 83 +/- 17 ml, P less than 0.02) and the larger stroke volume on digoxin was maintained during exercise. By contrast, stroke volume was reduced by one month of therapy with maximally tolerated nifedipine doses compared to control (74 +/- 8 vs 83 +/- 17 ml, P = 0.03) and this difference was maintained during exercise. Hydralazine in doses up to 225 mg/day for one month produced no significant changes in left ventricular performance compared to control at rest or during exercise. However, compared to digoxin ejection fraction at peak exercise was significantly less on hydralazine (0.39 +/- 0.9 vs 0.52 +/- 10, P less than 0.02). These data suggest that digoxin improved left ventricular performance and may be of benefit in the treatment of patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.

Hemodynamic effects of nitroglycerin in an experimental model of acute aortic regurgitation

Afterload reduction is an accepted therapeutic modality for the treatment of congestive heart failure caused by chronic aortic regurgitation. However, the role of vasodilator therapy in acute aortic incompetence has not been established. To investigate this, left ventricular volume overload was produced in 18 dogs by constructing a valved conduit from the descending thoracic aorta to the left ventricular apex. The time course of aortic, pulmonary and conduit flows was analyzed in eight control studies and established stability of the experimental model. In the remaining 10 dogs, intravenous nitroglycerin, titrated to reduce mean aortic blood pressure by 40%, and placebo (ethanol) were each infused for 20 min periods. Compared with placebo, nitroglycerin significantly reduced aortic flow (3,945 +/- 324 to 3,397 +/- 362 ml/min, p less than 0.01), regurgitant flow (1,304 +/- 131 to 764 +/- 90 ml/min, p less than 0.001), septal-lateral end-diastolic diameter (47.5 +/- 1.8 to 46.5 +/- 1.8 mm, p less than 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (6.9 +/- 0.8 to 6.0 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), left ventricular stroke work (19.0 +/- 2.6 to 10.8 +/- 1.7 g-m/beat, p less than 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (2,253 +/- 173 to 1,433 +/- 117 dyne-s/cm5, p less than 0.001). In contrast, pulmonary flow, left anterior descending coronary flow and subendocardial pH did not change during infusion of either nitroglycerin or placebo. These data indicate that by decreasing preload and afterload, and by preserving coronary flow and tissue pH, nitroglycerin effectively reduced ventricular and regurgitant volumes in the setting of acute volume overload.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pathophysiology and current therapy of congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure is a common clinical syndrome, with a relatively poor prognosis in its advanced stages. During the development of heart failure, there is a decline in myocardial contractility and activation of neurohormonal systems. An overshoot of some of these compensatory mechanisms sets the stage for therapeutic interventions. Any of the three therapeutic classes of drugs (inotropic drugs, diuretics or vasodilators) can be used as first-line therapy. Other classes can be added to produce additive effects on ventricular function. Because vasodilators have been shown to prolong life, they should be used routinely in patients with heart failure. Arrhythmias and sudden death are relatively common in heart failure, although the value of antiarrhythmic therapy is less certain. Although current therapy is very helpful in patients with heart failure, it is clear that preventive approaches will be more effective in decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Effect of electrical stimulus parameters on the development and propagation of action potentials in short excitable fibres

Intracellular action potentials (IAPs) produced by short fibres in response to their electrical stimulation were analysed. IAPs were calculated on the basis of the Hodgkin-Huxley (1952) model by the method described by Joyner et al. (1978). Principal differences were found in processes of activation of short (semilength L less than 5 lambda) and long fibres under near-threshold stimulation. The shorter the fibre, the lower was the threshold value (Ithr). Dependence of the latency on the stimulus strength (Ist) was substantially non-linear and was affected by the fibre length. Both fibre length and stimulus strength influenced the IAP amplitude, the instantaneous propagation velocity (IPV) and the site of the first origin of the IAP (and, consequently, excitability of the short fibre membrane). With L less than or equal to 2 lambda and Ithr less than or equal to Ist less than or equal to 1.1Ithr, IPV could reach either very high values (so that all the fibre membrane fired practically simultaneously) or even negative values. The latter corresponded to the first origin of the propagated IAP, not at the site of stimulation but at the fibre termination or at a midpoint. The characters of all the above dependencies were unchanged irrespective of the manner of approaching threshold (variation of stimulus duration or its strength). Reasons for differences in processes of activation of short and long fibres are discussed in terms of electrical load and latency. Applications of the results to explain an increased jitter, velocity recovery function and velocity-diameter relationship are also discussed.

Intertest variability of echocardiographic and chest X-ray measurements: implications for decision making in patients with aortic regurgitation

Echocardiograms and chest X-ray examinations are commonly employed for serial measurements of left ventricular size and function in patients with chronic aortic insufficiency and often support or even determine therapeutic decisions. This study was undertaken to assess the intertest variability of these measurements made from M-mode echocardiograms and X-ray films performed 3 months apart without intervening clinical or therapeutic changes in 22 patients with significant but asymptomatic aortic insufficiency. End-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, fractional shortening and cardiothoracic ratios were measured by the same reader, with the initial and 3 month tests being read both independently and together for comparison. The mean values for the initial and 3 month studies were similar, but the intertest variability was substantial, especially when the two tests were read independently. The 95% prediction limits are approximately 50% smaller when the serial studies are read together for comparison. The coefficient of variation for end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions was 6.1 and 10.1%, respectively, and that for fractional shortening was 17.1%. These findings translate into 95% level prediction limits exceeding +/- 8 mm for left ventricular dimensions and 0.12 for fractional shortening; changes on serial evaluations would have to exceed these values to be considered with a high degree of certainty to represent more than random variability. Although this variability may reflect a number of biologic and technical factors, it emphasizes the need to be cautious in making decisions based solely on changes between two tests, particularly if they are not evaluated together.

Effects of six-month afterload reduction therapy with hydralazine in chronic aortic regurgitation

Seventeen patients with chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) were studied to determine whether 6 months of hydralazine therapy can reduce the severity of AR or reverse left ventricular (LV) enlargement and hypertrophy. Echocardiography, radionuclide angiography at rest and during exercise, and maximal treadmill exercise with respiratory gas analysis were performed at intake and after a 6-month double-blind treatment period. After dose titration with hydralazine, patients were randomized to their maximal tolerated hydralazine dose or to placebo. At intake, hydralazine and placebo groups were similar. Six patients taking hydralazine and 8 taking placebo completed the study protocol. One patient taking placebo died and 2 patients taking hydralazine withdrew with drug-related adverse effects. The mean titrated dose of hydralazine was 96 +/- 9 mg, but the mean treatment dose was 63 +/- 21 mg administered 3 times daily because of drug intolerance. After 6 months, mean systolic blood pressure with hydralazine therapy decreased from 136 to 125 mm Hg (p less than 0.02), and end-systolic posterior wall thickness increased from 1.58 to 1.70 cm (p less than 0.05), resulting in a significant reduction in M-mode meridional end-systolic stress (from 104 to 80 kdynes/cm2) (p less than 0.05). M-mode fractional shortening increased from 0.28 to 0.31 (p less than 0.05) with hydralazine, but mean LV echocardiographic dimensions were unchanged. LV mass increased from 383 to 434 g (p less than 0.05) with hydralazine primarily because of an increase in end-diastolic wall thickness. In the placebo group, there was no change in any of the hemodynamic or echocardiographic parameters at 6 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic effects of verapamil in left ventricular valvular volume overload

The hemodynamic consequences of aortic and mitral insufficiency may be influenced by the high systemic vascular resistance often seen in these patients. Since the calcium antagonists have been shown to reduce systemic vascular resistance, we evaluated the effects of intravenous verapamil in 23 patients. In 11 patients with aortic insufficiency, verapamil resulted in a 20% increase in cardiac index (p less than 0.001), 18% increase in forward stroke volume index (p less than 0.001), and a 24% decrease in regurgitant fraction (p less than 0.005). In the 12 patients with mitral insufficiency, verapamil resulted in a 19% increase in both cardiac index (p = 0.004), and forward stroke volume index (p less than 0.001), while there was a 19% decrease in regurgitant fraction (p less than 0.02). Left ventricular end-systolic stress decreased significantly in both groups as did end-diastolic stress in the mitral insufficiency group. There was no significant change in several measures of contractile performance, though the end-systolic stress-to-volume index ratio fell significantly (p less than 0.04) in the mitral insufficiency group. Our findings suggest that the vasodilatory effects of intravenous verapamil predominate over the negative inotropic effects in patients with aortic and mitral insufficiency. Verapamil may be of use in patients intolerant to other vasodilators, patients with concomitant ischemic heart disease, or those with supraventricular arrhythmias.

New concepts and drugs in the treatment of congestive heart failure

This article seeks to make clear the basic differences in the treatment of heart failure between therapeutic maneuvers that are aimed at improving the mechanical loading conditions of the heart and those that are aimed at augmenting the fundamental contractile or inotropic state of the myocardium. Emphasis is placed on recognizing that treatment expectations must be viewed within an age- or maturity-dependent framework, since a diminished margin of cardiocirculatory reserve exists in the smallest and youngest patients that limits the extent of benefit that may be derived from diverse treatment approaches.

Noninvasive assessment of acute effects of nifedipine on rest and exercise hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with aortic regurgitation

The acute effects of nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) on hemodynamics and cardiac function were studied at rest and during supine bicycle exercise in 20 patients with aortic regurgitation. At rest, heart rate increased by 13%, systemic vascular resistance decreased by 34% and regurgitant index decreased by 17%. The change in systemic vascular resistance was related to its initial rest level (r = 0.82, p less than 0.001) and to the changes in forward cardiac output (r = 0.58, p less than 0.01) and regurgitant index (r = 0.60, p less than 0.01). Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, stroke volume and ejection fraction were unchanged, whereas right ventricular ejection fraction increased. During exercise, nifedipine administration further increased heart rate by 8% and decreased systemic vascular resistance by 19%. Both forward stroke volume and forward cardiac output increased, but total left ventricular stroke volume was unchanged, resulting in a significant decrease in regurgitant index. Although left ventricular end-diastolic volume was slightly decreased, end-systolic volume did not increase; thus, ejection fraction was higher than that during control exercise (p less than 0.01). Right ventricular ejection fraction increased further. In aortic regurgitation, the acute administration of nifedipine improved cardiac performance and reduced regurgitation at rest and during exercise as a result of afterload reduction and increased heart rate. Whether these beneficial effects will occur during long-term therapy requires further investigation.

Conceptual dilemmas in the classification of vasodilator drugs for severe chronic heart failure. Advocacy of a pragmatic approach to the selection of a therapeutic agent

Two distinct systems of classifying vasodilator drugs have been developed over the past decade in an attempt to guide the choice of a therapeutic agent for the patient with severe heart failure, but the merits and utility of these systems have not been critically evaluated. Vasodilator drugs may be categorized according to their peripheral site of action: an agent may exert its effects preferentially on systemic arteries, systemic veins, or on both circulations. However, changes in the peripheral circulation cannot be directly translated into an improvement in central hemodynamic variables; furthermore, immediate hemodynamic responses may not be predictive of long-term clinical efficacy. Hence, there is no evidence that characterization of patients into hemodynamic subsets determined by the findings of right heart catheterization improves the clinical outcome of vasodilator therapy in chronic heart failure. An alternative classification system groups vasodilator drugs according to their mechanism of action: an agent may possess direct vasodilating effects or may exert its actions via selective neurohumoral inhibition. However, attempts to identify patients who might be most responsive to neurohumoral antagonism by measuring plasma renin activity or circulating levels of catecholamines before treatment have not been successful in predicting the clinical responses to therapy. Because neither system of drug classification provides the clinician with useful therapeutic guidelines, patients with severe heart failure appear to be best managed using a pragmatic approach in which specific drugs that produce predictable therapeutic benefits with a low frequency of side effects are utilized preferentially. Among presently available vasodilator agents, only captopril and oral isosorbide dinitrate have been shown to produce consistent hemodynamic and clinical improvement with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions.

Favorable effects of hydralazine on the hemodynamic response to isometric exercise in chronic severe aortic regurgitation

The hemodynamic effects of isometric exercise and the response to hydralazine therapy were evaluated in 11 patients with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (AR). Isometric exercise produced a significant increase in heart rate (from 78 +/- 11 to 93 +/- 19 beats/min [mean +/- standard deviation], p less than 0.05), mean blood pressure (from 83 +/- 8 to 104 +/- 20 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), mean right atrial pressure (from 3 +/- 2 to 7 +/- 5 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (from 12 +/- 7 to 18 +/- 10 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Small and insignificant changes were seen in cardiac index (from 3.4 +/- 0.8 to 3.9 +/- 1.0 liters/min/m2), systemic vascular resistance (from 1,097 +/- 257 to 1,171 +/- 284 dynes s cm-5), pulmonary vascular resistance (from 120 +/- 76 to 130 +/- 89 dynes s cm-5) and stroke volume index (from 44 +/- 10 to 43 +/- 12 ml/m2). After oral hydralazine administration (100 to 300 mg), hemodynamic values during isometric exercise were: Heart rate increased further, to 105 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05), mean blood pressure was 102 +/- 16 mm Hg (difference not significant [NS]) cardiac index increased markedly, to 5.2 +/- 1.4 liters/min/m2 (p less than 0.05), stroke volume index increased to 49 +/- 12 ml/m2 (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vasodilator and inotropic therapy for severe chronic heart failure: passion and skepticism

Although substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years in the development of vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the management of patients with severe chronic heart failure, much of the enthusiasm that surrounded the introduction of many of these agents has subsequently been tempered by reports of drug failure or adverse reactions. In this review and analysis, currently available vasodilator and inotropic agents are critically and comparatively evaluated to assess their respective advantages and limitations. It is apparent that the ability of most of these drugs to produce substantial clinical benefits in patients with severe heart failure has probably been overstated. Therapy fails to achieve the desired clinical results all too frequently, possibly as the result of: the choice of an ineffective drug; the administration of an effective drug in subtherapeutic doses; the administration of an effective drug to improperly selected patients; the failure of initial hemodynamic benefits to be sustained; the occurrence of severe or serious adverse reactions; and the failure to alter concomitant therapy appropriately. The present analysis indicates that there is no uniformly effective or safe vasodilator or inotropic drug for patients with severe heart failure; all agents have important limitations. Of the available therapeutic choices, however, long-term converting enzyme inhibition appears to produce more consistent hemodynamic and clinical benefits with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions than other pharmacologic approaches for the management of these severely ill patients.

Unloading effects of prazosin in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

Seventeen patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) were examined by echocardiography and left and right heart catheterization. Cardiac output and regurgitation volume were measured by the dye dilution method. Administration of single and four repeated doses of prazosin (PZ) led to reductions of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic, end-systolic, and left atrial end-systolic diameters, and decrease of left ventricular filling pressure. Regurgitation fraction, regurgitation flow, and volume indexes decreased significantly (p less than 0.01). Total left ventricular output decreased (p less than 0.001) as did derived parameters of left ventricular work and performance. Fractional shortening, ejection fraction, and mean circumferential fiber shortening velocity increased as did LV dP/dt and dP/dt/P. Changes in heart rate and cardiac and stroke indexes after PZ were not significant. Preload reduction (dilation of the venous bed and reduction of regurgitation) seems to be the most important effect of PZ in AR. We found PZ to be a suitable and effective drug for oral treatment of chronic AR.

Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular wall stress in chronic congestive heart failure patients

Therapy with prazosin can improve the condition of patients with congestive heart failure due to its vasodilating action. Therefore nine patients with volume overloaded left ventricles due to aortic insufficiency and mitral insufficiency received 1 mg. of prazosin four times a day for two weeks. Peak and end-systolic wall stress were estimated using a noninvasive echocardiographic technique. The peak systolic wall stress in this group was 155 x 10(3) dynes/cm2 which is similar to the reported normal value. However, the end systolic wall stress was 101 x 10(3) dynes/cm2 which is much higher than the reported normal values. Following the administration of oral prazosin, the end systolic stress was normalized while the peak systolic stress was reduced below normal. As a result of therapy with prazosin, the ejection fraction, the percentage of change in the minor axis, and the velocity of circumferential fiber shortening significantly increased. Thus, the oral administration of prazosin can improve left ventricular function in patients with mitral insufficiency and aortic insufficiency.

Vasodilator therapy for acute myocardial infarction and chronic congestive heart failure

Vasodilator therapy is useful adjunctive therapy in the management of both acute and chronic heart failure. Arteriolar dilators, such as hydralazine, increase cardiac output by decreasing the elevated peripheral vascular resistance that occurs in heart failure. Venodilators, such as nitrates, decrease ventricular filling pressures by redistributing blood so that more is pooled in peripheral veins. Vasodilators that produce both effects (nitro-prusside, prazosin, captopril, for example) are usually helpful in short-term improvement of hemodynamics. Long-term treatment with nonparenteral vasodilators often reduces symptoms and increases exercise tolerance, although there is inconclusive evidence regarding the effects of these agents on mortality. In acute myocardial infarction, intravenous vasodilators frequently improve cardiac performance. Evidence regarding their beneficial effects on infarct size and immediate mortality is encouraging but inconclusive. There is little evidence that they prolong life in patients who survive cardiogenic shock and leave the hospital. Thus, vasodilators can improve hemodynamics and lessen symptoms, but more evidence is needed regarding their long-term effects on survival.

Valvular heart disease: a perspective

Valve replacement has been one of the most important advances in the management of patients with valvular heart disease. The 10 and 15 year survival rate after isolated aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards valve is 56 and 44%, respectively. At 5 and 7 years, survival with the Björk-Shiley, porcine bioprosthesis and the Starr-Edwards valve is similar. Patients operated on during the last 5 to 10 years have a much better survival rate than those operated on in the 1960s; therefore, the 10 and 15 year survival of those operated on recently should improve. All patients with a mechanical prosthesis need long-term anticoagulant therapy with drugs of the coumadin type. Porcine bioprostheses have a low failure rate up to 5 years after valve replacement; after this, valve failure occurs at an increasing rate, but the incidence at 10 and 15 years is not known. Valve replacement usually produces a marked improvement in the symptomatic status of the patient because of improved hemodynamics; ventricular function is improved in selected subsets of patients. The role of long-term vasodilator therapy has not been fully determined. Antibiotic prophylaxis for secondary prevention of rheumatic carditis and for prevention of infective endocarditis is important.

Acebutolol and coronary artery surgery. Plasma levels following oral pre-operative treatment

Plasma levels of acebutolol and its major human metabolite, diacetolol, were determined before, during and after aortocoronary bypass grafting in 10 patients who had received a chronic oral regimen of acebutolol 200 mg t.d.s. for at least 6 days before surgery, a 200 mg dose with the premedication and 5-10 mg intravenously immediately before intubation. It was found that this regimen produced beta-adrenoceptor antagonist levels which were within the range in which attenuation of hypertension and tachydysrhythmia occurs. These effective plasma levels were sustained throughout surgery and persisted into the early recovery period.