Late phase of nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilatation blunted by inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis

Nitrates in myocardial infarction

Until two decades ago nitroglycerin was contraindicated in acute myocardial infarction (MI). Studies in the canine model demonstrated that low-dose intravenous (i.v.) infusion, carefully titrated to decrease mean blood pressure by 10% but not below 80 mmHg, during early stages of acute MI produced marked reduction of left ventricular (LV) preload, improvement in regional perfusion, and limitation of infarct size and remodeling. However, more i.v. nitroglycerin to decrease blood pressure further resulted in a paradoxical J-curve effect, with hypoperfusion and increased infarct size. Clinical studies have confirmed that low-dose i.v. nitroglycerin infusion for the first 48 hours after acute MI is safe, not only for improving performance in LV failure, but also for limiting ischemic injury, infarct size, remodeling, and infarct-related complications, including deaths in-hospital and up to 1 year. Recent studies suggest that more prolonged therapy with nitrates spanning the healing phase of acute anterior Q-wave MI can further limit LV remodeling and preserve function. Preliminary results of the recently completed ISIS-4 megatrial suggest, however, that long-term nitrate in patients with suspected MI in the 1990s does not improve survival significantly.

Phenomenon of nitrate tolerance

The phenomenon of nitrate tolerance has now been appreciated for almost a century, and our understanding of this process has greatly improved during the past 20 years. Therapeutic nitrates are now recognized as exogenous sources of nitric oxide (or nitrosothiols), which appears to be a primary mediator of natural vasodilatation. Nitrates have been clearly shown to have vasodilatory and antiplatelet effects, both of which diminish during continuous exposure. Nitrate tolerance has been documented with most nitrate preparations when the patient is given continuous nitrate therapy. Tolerance to nitrates may occur in any patient, regardless of underlying illness, medication dose, or serum concentration of NTG. The cause of this phenomenon is multifactorial; there appear to be both cellular and systemic processes involved. To date, no adjuvant pharmacologic intervention has conclusively demonstrated benefit in preventing, abating, or reversing nitrate tolerance. Interruption of nitrate exposure for as little as 8 to 12 hours does appear to be the best means of preventing or reversing tolerance. Nevertheless, some patients with objective tolerance continue to experience relief of symptoms. In addition, despite laboratory-documented cross-tolerance, patients receiving continuous nitrate therapy at usual clinical doses may continue to benefit from the hemodynamic and antianginal effects of SL NTG. Hence, nitrate tolerance is a real entity, but the clinical importance of this phenomenon remains controversial. Finally, further investigation will need to address quality-of-life issues and perhaps assess relief of ischemia by other means.

Role of nitrates after acute myocardial infarction

Apart from their ability to relieve myocardial ischemia, nitrates have an important role to play on preservation of left ventricular (LV) geometry and function after acute myocardial infarction (MI). In the first 48 hours after acute MI, intravenous nitroglycerin infusion titrated to a low-dose regimen produces multiple benefits, including smaller infarct size, better regional and global LV function, less remodeling, fewer in-hospital complications, and fewer deaths in-hospital and up to 1 year. This regimen might be an effective adjunct during reperfusion therapy for salvaging ischemic myocardium, LV geometry, and function. Recent studies indicate that prolonged therapy with nitrates during the healing phase after acute MI can effectively further limit progressive LV remodeling (less LV dilation, expansion, thinning, and aneurysm formation) and preserve LV function. Tolerance with chronic therapy is avoided by an eccentric dose regimen to provide a nitrate-free interval.

Intravenous nitroglycerin unloading in acute myocardial infarction

Low-dose intravenous nitroglycerin infusion can be safely administered during acute myocardial infarction to unload the left ventricle and salvage ischemic myocardium and left ventricular geometry and function. In an experimental conscious dog model, low-dose infusion titrated to decrease mean blood pressure by 10% over the first 6 hours after coronary artery ligation resulted in 51% decrease in infarct size, 54% decrease in preload, and more than 50% increase in collateral blood flow. The same benefits were seen when methoxamine was given to counteract that 10% decrease in blood pressure. Similar short-term nitroglycerin infusion also limited remodeling in the dog model. More important, no myocardial salvage was seen with excessive nitroglycerin-induced hypotension to levels less than 80 mm Hg. Clinically, prolonged low-dose nitroglycerin infusion was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 310 patients with acute infarction: 154 received nitroglycerin and 156 received placebo. Nitroglycerin was titrated to reduce mean blood pressure by 10% in normotensive patients and up to 30% in hypertensive (blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg) patients, but not to less than 80 mm Hg. Nitroglycerin produced several benefits compared with placebo: (1) smaller creatine kinase infarct size; (2) less regional left ventricular dysfunction, better global ejection fraction, and less infarct expansion and thinning; (3) better clinical functional status and hemodynamics; (4) fewer inhospital complications such as acute left ventricular failure and dilation due to marked infarct expansion, left ventricular thrombus, cardiogenic shock, and infarct extension; and (5) fewer deaths up to 1 year in patients with anterior Q-wave infarction.

Nitrates: why and how should they be used today? Current status of the clinical usefulness of nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate and isosorbide-5-mononitrate

Nitrates are highly effective both in terminating acute attacks of angina pectoris and in the prophylaxis of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. Preload reduction by venodilatation is the prevailing mechanism of nitrates in patients with chronic stable angina and is the unique feature distinguishing them from beta and calcium-channel blockers. Nitrates dilate coronary arteries not only in pre- and poststenotic vessels, but also in eccentric lesions. In patients with endothelial dysfunction, nitrates seem to be the physiological substitute for endothelium-derived relaxing factor. During the past decade, however, there has been substantial evidence of a clinically relevant loss of the anti-ischemic effects ("nitrate tolerance"). Many studies with oral dosing of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate at least three times daily have proven nitrate tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease and/or congestive heart failure. Complete loss of anti-ischemic effects after repetitive, continuous patch attachments has also been found. As we first showed in 1983, intermittent therapy with once-daily ingestion of high-dose sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate was successful in preventing the development of tolerance. Similarly, tolerance to isosorbide-5-mononitrate also does not develop when it is ingested once daily. It is now generally accepted that a daily low-nitrate interval is required to prevent tolerance development. Although the minimal patch-free interval required to prevent tolerance needs further investigation, a 12-h patch-free interval should prevent tolerance in most patients. The prolonged duration of action of once-daily high-dosage administration of sustained-release formulations, the improved patient compliance with a single daily administration, and the increased likelihood of maximal anti-ischemic effects are important reasons for recommending high single daily doses of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate.

The effect of aspirin on the hemodynamic response to nitroglycerin

The role of prostaglandins in mediating the hemodynamic response to nitroglycerin in vivo is controversial. To determine the effect of inhibiting prostaglandin production on the response to nitroglycerin, either placebo or aspirin (650 mg) was administered 1 hour prior to the administration of nitroglycerin (432 micrograms) sublingually to 40 healthy volunteers in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Prior to nitroglycerin administration, blood pressure and pulse rate were determined noninvasively every 2 minutes until stable conditions were reached, and then after nitroglycerin administration determinations were made every 1 minute for the first 10 minutes, every 2 minutes for the next 10 minutes, and every 5 minutes until 30 minutes had elapsed. At peak response in the placebo study, nitroglycerin lowered systolic pressure from 117 +/- 10 to 111 +/- 10 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001). Unexpectedly, nitroglycerin increased diastolic pressure from 75 +/- 8 to 80 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.005), thus reducing pulse pressure significantly. Pulse rate after nitroglycerin increased from 72 +/- 11 to 85 +/- 14 (p less than 0.001). Aspirin slightly modified the pattern of response at 1 minute but altered neither the peak hemodynamic responses nor the areas under the time-pressure and time-pulse curves. Thus nitroglycerin-induced prostaglandin production does not play a major role in the systemic hemodynamic response to nitroglycerin in vivo.

Nitrate tolerance

The organic nitrates are the most widely used agents in the management of patients with angina pectoris. When initially administered by the oral route, the nitrates produce profound changes in systemic hemodynamics and significant and prolonged improvement in exercise duration. It has been shown that during short periods of regular oral nitrate administration, the hemodynamic, antiischemic and antianginal effects of the nitrates are greatly reduced. Thus, when initially administered, oral isosorbide dinitrate prolongs exercise duration for a period of several hours, but during sustained 4-times-daily therapy, exercise tolerance is improved for only 2 hours after administration. Studies with transdermal preparations of isosorbide dinitrate and nitroglycerin also show improvement during short-term administration for up to 8 hours, but after several days of once-daily therapy, the effects of these agents are similar to placebo. It is apparent that nitrate tolerance is a clinically relevant problem. Although tolerance develops rapidly during nitrate therapy, it is reversed promptly during nitrate-free periods. Oral nitrates maintain their antianginal effects when given 2 or 3 times daily with provision of a nitrate-free period. Studies are currently underway to investigate the effects of intermittent administration schedules with transdermal nitrate preparations.

Hemodynamic attenuation and the nitrate-free interval: alternative dosing strategies for transdermal nitroglycerin

Various dosing strategies to determine therapeutic effects of nitroglycerin (NTG) preparations are reviewed. The importance of individual patient titration in establishing an effective NTG dosage is emphasized by reviewing a nitroglycerin ointment study and a crossover study. Studies reporting the development of hemodynamic attenuation ("tolerance") with longterm nitrate therapy are also discussed. The results of these and other studies suggest that the magnitude of the hemodynamic response to NTG or isosorbide dinitrate diminishes over time, with acute or first-dose effects far exceeding those obtained during long-term therapy. However, patients on long-term therapy continue to respond to sublingual NTG, which suggests that this phenomenon is not true NTG tolerance. The effect of a nitrate-free interval as a mechanism for avoiding hemodynamic attenuation of NTG therapy is reviewed. The results of 4 studies discussed found that intermittent nitrate protocols were not associated with the attenuated hemodynamic effect observed during chronic therapy. Two possible mechanisms for the vasodilatory effects of nitroglycerin are discussed. The first relates to the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate in the smooth muscle cells of arteries and veins; the second to the synthesis of prostaglandin I2 by vascular endothelial cells. A mechanism by which nitrate receptors could be manipulated to increase vascular responsiveness is theorized, as well as a means by which a nitrate-free interval might avoid the development of hemodynamic attenuation in terms of cellular mechanisms and receptors.