Risks and benefits of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. The International Transcranial Doppler Collaborators

Editor's Choice - Safety of Shunting Strategies During Carotid Endarterectomy: A Vascular Quality Initiative Data Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate in hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to shunt usage, particularly in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) or recent stroke. Data from CEAs registered in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2012 and 2020 were analysed, excluding surgeons with < 10 CEAs registered in the database, concomitant procedures, re-interventions, and incomplete data.

METHODS

Based on their rate of shunt use, participating surgeons were divided in three groups: non-shunters (< 5%), selective shunters (5 - 95%), and routine shunters (> 95%). Primary outcomes of in hospital stroke, death, and stroke and death rate (SDR) were analysed in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

RESULTS

A total of 113 202 patients met the study criteria, of whom 31 147 were symptomatic and 82 055 were asymptomatic. Of the 1 645 surgeons included, 12.1% were non-shunters, 63.6% were selective shunters, and 24.3% were routine shunters, with 10 557, 71 160, and 31 579 procedures in each group, respectively. In the univariable analysis, in hospital stroke (2.0% vs. 1.9% vs. 1.6%; p = .17), death (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.4%; p = .71), and SDR (2.2% vs. 2.1% vs. 1.8%; p = .23) were not statistically significantly different among the three groups in the symptomatic cohort. The asymptomatic cohort also did not show a statistically significant difference for in hospital stroke (0.9% vs. 1.0% vs. 0.9%; p = .55), death (0.2% vs. 0.2% vs. 0.2%; p = .64), and SDR (1.0% vs. 1.1% vs. 1.0%; p = .43). The multivariable model did not show a statistically significant difference for the primary outcomes between the three shunting cohorts. On subgroup analysis, the SDRs were not statistically significantly different for patients with CCO (3.3% vs. 2.5% vs. 2.4%; p = .64) and those presenting with a recent stroke (2.9% vs. 3.4% vs. 3.1%; p = .60).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences were found between three shunting strategies for in hospital SDR, including in patients with CCO or recent stroke.

Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data.

METHODS

For the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of 4 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021.

RESULTS

The network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy with surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a surface under the cumulative ranking value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve for SEP's receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's area under the curve of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P = 1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2 = 22.863, with P < 0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2 = 2.005 (P = 0.157) and χˆ2 = 0.069 (P = 0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2 = 22.742, with P < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

During CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.

The effect of the collateral cerebrovascular circulation on tolerance to carotid artery cross-clamping and on early outcome after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The Circle of Willis (CoW) serves as the primary source of contralateral blood supply in patients who undergo carotid artery cross-clamping (CC) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It has been suggested that the CoW's anatomy influences CEA outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between the cerebral collateral circulation, a positive awake test for intraoperative neurologic deficit after carotid CC, and postoperative adverse neurologic events.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted searching MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies that assessed the cerebral circulation, including CoW variations, using neuroimaging techniques in patients who underwent carotid CC. For the metanalytical incidence, the statistical technique used was weight averaging. Otherwise, descriptive analysis was used due to the excessive heterogeneity of the studies.

RESULTS

Eight publications, seven cohort and one case-controlled study, involving 1313 patients who underwent carotid artery CC under loco-regional anesthesia, were included in the systematic review. The incidence of positive awake test in the cohort studies ranged from 4.4% to 19.7%. Carotid artery CC resulted in positive awake test in 5% to 91% of patients with alterations in the anterior portion and in 27% to 74% with alterations in the posterior portion of the CoW. A positive awake test in patients with contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion ranged from 5.8% to 45.7%. Contralateral carotid stenosis >70% or occlusion were associated with a positive awake test (P < .001). Patients with incomplete CoW did not have statistically significant correlation with intraoperative neurological deficits after CC. Data were insufficient to evaluate the effect of the collateral circulation on early outcome after CEA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, contralateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, but not CoW abnormalities, were associated with a positive awake test after carotid artery CC. Further research is needed to evaluate which specific CoW anomaly predicts neurologic deficit after CC and to confirm association between a positive awake test and clinical outcome after CEA.

Comparing carotid endarterectomies with or without shunting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

BACKGROUND

Recent research shows that placement of an intraluminal shunt during a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be associated with postoperative complications. Therefore, we compared CEA operations with or without shunting to further analyze their clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, 13,736 cases between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed to compare adult symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients who underwent a CEA operation, with or without shunt placement.

RESULTS

Rates of stroke with a neurological deficit (p = 0.012), myocardial infarction (p = 0.021), and urinary tract infection (p = 0.030) were higher among symptomatic patients with shunting. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that risk of CNI was higher among both symptomatic (93.63%, p < 0.001) and asymptomatic (69.58%, p = 0.001) patients with shunting, irrespective of confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

Shunting was found to be associated with higher rates of postoperative complications in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patient populations.

Incomplete circle of Willis as a risk factor for intraoperative ischemic events during carotid endarterectomies performed under regional anesthesia - A prospective case-series

Background

The role of the willisian collaterals during carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) is a debated issue. The aim of the present work was to test whether an incomplete or non-functional circle of Willis (CoW) is a risk factor for ischemic events during CEA.

Patients and methods

CEAs were performed under local anesthesia. Patients were considered symptomatic (SY) if neurological signs appeared after the cross-clamping phase. In SY patients shunt insertion was performed. CoW on CT angiograms (CTa) were analyzed offline and categorized as non-functional (missing or hypoplastic collaterals) or functional collaterals by three neuroradiologists. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was performed throughout the procedure.

Results

Based on CTa, 67 incomplete circles were found, 54 were asymptomatic (ASY) and 13 were SY. No complete CoW was found among the SY patients. Significant differences could be detected between incomplete and complete circles between ASY and SY groups (Chi-square: 6.08; p = 0.013). The anterior communicating artery was missing or hypoplastic in 5/13 SY cases. There were no cases of the non-functional anterior communicating arteries in the ASY group (Chi-square: 32.9; p = 10^-8). A missing or non-functional bilateral posterior communicating artery was observed in 9/13 SY and in 9/81 ASY patients (Chi-square: 24.4; p = 10^-7). NIRS had a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 74.5% in detecting neurological symptoms.

Conclusions

Collateral ability of the CoW may be a risk factor for ischemic events during CEAs. Further studies should delineate whether the preoperative assessment of collateral capacity may be useful in decision-making about shunt use during CEA.

Case of effective suction to secure the true lumen for acute occlusion after carotid endarterectomy

During or following carotid endarterectomy, dissection and occlusion of the internal carotid artery can occur. In cases of stenosis or almost complete occlusion, recanalization is relatively easy; however, in cases of complete occlusion, advancing a guidewire into the true lumen may be challenging. Few reports on how to address this problem have been published. Here, we report a case of suction-enabled advancement of the wire into the true lumen during endovascular treatment of an acute occlusion of the internal carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy. An 80-year-old man underwent carotid endarterectomy; the next morning, he exhibited aphasia and right-sided paralysis, and magnetic resonance images showed left cerebral infarction and left internal carotid artery occlusion. The patient was transferred to our hospital for recanalization. Imaging with contrast material showed that the left internal carotid artery was completely occluded. During recanalization, futile attempts were made to advance the wire into the true lumen. The occlusion was aspirated, and angiography then showed an inflow of contrast material into the vessel, which indicated slight distal widening; this widening allowed the wire to move into the true lumen. The occlusion extended distally, and 2 stents were placed over the entire lesion. Good recanalization was eventually achieved.

Impact of Shunting Practice Patterns During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the effect of surgeons' shunting practice and shunt use on the early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a multicenter national prospective database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2019) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days after an ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack. Surgeons were gauged as routine shunters if they shunted in >95% of CEAs, otherwise were classified as selective shunters. In-hospital stroke and death rates were compared between routine and selective shunters, stratifying by type of index event (transient ischemic attack versus stroke) and timing of CEA (≤2 versus >2 days).

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand four hundred sixty-nine CEAs were performed after a transient ischemic attack (43%) or stroke (57%), 3186 (24%) by routine shunters, and 10 283 (76%) by selective shunters. Comparing routine and selective shunters, in-hospital stroke (1.9% versus 2.4%; P=0.09) and death (0.4% versus 0.5%; P=0.73) rates were similar. A lower stroke rate (1.5% versus 4.2%; P=0.02) was achieved by routine shunters for CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, a higher stroke rate occurred in case of shunt use (2.9% versus 2.3%; P<0.01), mainly due to cases presenting with stroke (3.5% versus 2.4%; P<0.01) but not transient ischemic attack (1.8% versus 1.5%; P=0.57). Awake anesthesia was adopted in 7.8% of cases by selective shunters and in 0.8% by routine shunters, without impact on the perioperative stroke rate (1.8% versus 2.3%; P=0.349).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national cohort, the overall outcomes of CEA were similar between routine and selective shunters. A lower postoperative stroke rate was achieved by routine shunters in CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, intraoperatively indicated shunting determined an increased stroke rate, likely due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. These data may guide the decision regarding timing of CEA and shunting intention in symptomatic patients.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. The shunt may improve the outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2002, 2009, and 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting, and to assess the best method for selective shunting on death, stroke, and other complications in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2021), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2021), Embase (1980 to April 2021), and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) (1980 to April 2021). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and handsearched relevant journals, conference proceedings, and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent review authors performed data extraction, selection, and analysis. A pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for all outcomes of interest. Best and worse case scenarios were also calculated in case of unavailable data. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias, and quality of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

No new trials were found for this updated review. Thus, six trials involving 1270 participants are included in this latest review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Only three trials comparing routine shunting and no shunting were eligible for meta-analysis. Major findings of this comparison found that the routine shunting had less risk of stroke-related death within 30 days of surgery (best case) than no shunting (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96, I² not applicable, P = 0.05, low-quality evidence), the routine shunting group had a lower stroke rate within 24 hours of surgery (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.78, I² = not applicable, P = 0.02, low-quality evidence), and ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best case) (Peto OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, I² = 52%, P = 0.04, low-quality evidence) than the no shunting group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring. However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy when performed under general anaesthesia. Large-scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Elongated styloid process as a possible cause of distal carotid artery dissection after carotid endarterectomy using indwelling shunt: A case report

Background:

A dissection beginning from a point distal to the endpoint of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is called distal carotid artery dissection (CAD), which is known as one of the significant surgical complications of CEA.

Case Description:

We present a case of distal CAD as a perioperative complication after CEA using indwelling shunt. We estimated this pathophysiology to be caused by the mechanical conflict of the inflated balloon with the elongated styloid process.

Conclusion:

Since a distal CAD can cause severe, irreversible neurological deficits, preoperative assessment of the styloid process should be routinely performed in CEA.

Effect of Beach-Chair Position on Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery—A Preliminary Observational Study

Background Hypotension and cerebral hypoperfusion, commonly encountered in beach-chair position under general anesthesia, carry the risk of neurologic complications. There is a paucity of data on monitoring cerebral perfusion. Our objective was to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and middle cerebral artery velocity (Vmca) in the supine and beach-chair position and estimate its correlation during hypotension.

Materials and Methods Twenty ASA class I and II patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery in beach-chair position were included in the study. MAP was measured invasively with the pressure transducer leveled to the phlebostatic axis. Vmca was measured with a 2 MHz transcranial Doppler (TCD) probe through the temporal window. Both MAP and Vmca were measured at baseline after anesthetic induction in the supine position (BL), on assuming the beach-chair position (AP), at steady-state hemodynamics in beach-chair position (P1), whenever there was a drop in MAP > 20% (P2), and on the restoration of MAP (P3).

Results A mean decrease in MAP and Vmca by 24.76% and 27.96%, respectively, from supine to beach-chair position with a significant linear correlation between MAP and Vmca along with a Pearsons’ coefficient of 0.77 was seen. A change in MAP of 1 mm of Hg resulted in a change in Vmca by 0.53 cm/sec (p < 0.05).

Conclusion A significant decrease in MAP and Vmca was observed in the beach-chair position. TCD could be used as a point-of-care noninvasive technique to reliably assess cerebral perfusion.

Laser speckle contrast imaging of forehead cutaneous blood flow during carotid endarterectomy as a potential non-invasive method for surrogate monitoring of cerebral perfusion

Monitoring cerebral perfusion is important for goal-directed anesthesia. Taking advantage of the supply of the supraorbital region and Glabella from the internal carotid artery (ICA), we evaluated changes in cutaneous blood flow using laser speckle contrast imagining (LSCI) as a potential method for indirect real-time monitoring of cerebral perfusion. Nine patients (8 men, mean age 70 years) underwent eversion carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. Cutaneous blood flow of the forehead was monitored using LSCI. During clamping of the common carotid artery (CCA), ipsilateral supraorbital region and Glabellas cutaneous blood flow dropped from 334 ± 135 to 221 ± 109 AU (p = 0.023) (AU: arbitrary flux units) and from 384 ± 151 to 276 ± 107 AU (p = 0.023), respectively, whilst the contralateral supraorbital region cutaneous blood flow remained unchanged. The supraorbital cutaneous blood flow did not change significantly following reperfusion of the external carotid artery (ECA) (221 ± 109 to 281 ± 154 AU; p = 0.175) and ICA (281 ± 154 to 310 ± 184 AU; p = 01). A comparable trend for Glabella followed ECA (276 ± 107 to 342 ± 170 AU; p = 0.404) and ICA (342 ± 170 to 352 ± 191 AU; p = 01) reperfusion. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia, LSCI of the supraorbital and Glabella regions reflected clamping of the CCA but did not distinguish reperfusion of the ICA from that of the ECA.

Benefit of selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia

Objectives

Carotid cross-clamping during endarterectomy exposes the patient to intraoperative neurological deficits due to embolism or cerebral hypoperfusion. To prevent further cerebrovascular incidents, resorting to shunt is frequently recommended. However, since this method is also considered a stroke risk factor, the use is still controversial. This study aims to shed some light on the best approach regarding the use of shunt in symptomatic cerebral malperfusion after carotid artery cross-clamping.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a tertiary referral hospital who underwent carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia for carotid artery stenosis and manifested post-clamping neurologic deficits were prospectively gathered. Shunt use was left to the decision of the surgeon and performed in 31.6% (25) of the patients. Demographics, comorbidities, imaging tests, and clinical/intraoperative features were evaluated. For data assessment, univariate analysis was performed.

Results

Regarding 30-day stroke, 30-day postoperative complications (stroke, surgical hematoma, hyperperfusion syndrome), and cranial nerve injury, no significant differences were found ( P = 0.301, P = 0.460, and P = 0.301, respectively) between resource to shunt and non-shunt. Clamping and surgery times were significantly higher in the shunt group ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions

Selective-shunting did not demonstrate superiority for patients who developed focal deficits regarding stroke or other postoperative complications. However, due to the limitations of this study, the benefit of shunting cannot be excluded. Further randomized trials are recommended for precise results on this matter with current sparse clinical evidence.

The Role of Carotid Stump Pressure in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review evaluates the carotid stump pressure (CSP)’s role as a single parameter at any given pressure as an indicator for selective shunting, or vice versa, in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A systematic review of literature in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1969 to 2019 was conducted. The primary end point was set at 0 to 30-day mortality, ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and a secondary point at recognition of an optimal CSP pressure. The data was subjected to meta-analytics. The odds ratio (OR) was reported at 95% confidence interval (CI). This study has been registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019119851. The pooled analysis on the primary endpoint of IS demonstrated higher incidence of stroke in shunted CEAs solely based on CSP measurement alone (OR, 0.14, 95%CI: 0.08–0.24, I²=48%, p<0.001). Sub group analysis demonstrated similar patterns at 25 mmHg (OR, 0.06, 95%CI: 0.01–0.5, p<0.01), 30 mmHg (OR, 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01–0.63, p=0.02) and 40 mmHg (OR, 0.23, 95%CI: 0.09–0.57, p<0.01). This effect on end points of mortality and TIA demonstrated no benefit in either direction. CSP, as a single criterion, is not a reliable parameter in reduction of TIA, mortality, and IS at any given pressure range.

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy

Background

Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared.

Results

The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002).

Conclusion

NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage.

Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring in predicting perioperative strokes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted for studies on transcranial Doppler monitoring in CEA published from January 1970 through September 2015. All titles and abstracts were independently screened on the basis of predetermined inclusion criteria, which included randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective cohort reviews, patients who underwent CEA with intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring (either middle cerebral artery velocity [MCAV] or cerebral microembolic signals [MES]) and postoperative neurologic assessments up to 30 days after the surgery, and studies including an abstract, published in English on adult humans 18 years and older with a sample size of 50 or greater.

RESULTS

A total of 25articles with a sample population of 4705 patients were analyzed. Among the study patients, 189 developed perioperative strokes. Transcranial Doppler monitoring (either MCAV or MES) showed specificity of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.2%-81.8%) and sensitivity of 56.1% (95% CI, 46.8%-65.0%) for predicting perioperative strokes. Intraoperative MCAV changes during CEA showed strong specificity of 84.1% (95% CI, 74.4%-90.6) and sensitivity of 49.7% (95% CI, 40.6%-58.8) for predicting perioperative strokes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with perioperative strokes are 4 times more likely to have had transcranial Doppler changes (either MCAV or MES) during CEA compared to patients without strokes. Simultaneous MCAV and MES monitoring by transcranial Doppler sonography and combined intraoperative monitoring of transcranial Doppler sonography with somatosensory evoked potentials and electroencephalography during CEA to predict perioperative stroke could not be evaluated because of a lack of clinical studies combining these measures.

The effect of blood pressure and cardiac output on the quality of the surgical field and middle cerebral artery blood flow during endoscopic sinus surgery

BACKGROUND

A clear surgical field is critical during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Hypotensive anesthesia and cardiac output (CO) may optimize the surgical field; however, evidence of their effect on bleeding and cerebral blood flow is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of blood pressure (BP) and CO on intraoperative bleeding and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (Vmca ) during ESS.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis at a tertiary institution in 2013 were randomized to receive BP manipulation using target-controlled noradrenaline infusion during surgery to either their left or right sinuses. The contralateral side in each patient served as control. Bleeding was scored using a 0 to 10 point bleeding assessment scale (BAS, 0-10) and Vmca was measured using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography every 10 minutes or when surgically opportune, and time-matched with BP and CO. Data was analyzed using Bland-Altman methods.

RESULTS

A total of 105 time points were collected across a mean arterial pressure (MAP) range of 32 to 118 mmHg. Significant correlations were demonstrated between MAP and Vmca (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001), MAP and BAS (r = 0.50, p < 0.0001), CO and Vmca (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), and CO and BAS (r = 0.42, p < 0.0001). The best surgical fields were seen at 40 to 59 mmHg MAP. However, MAP below 60 mmHg produced >50% reduction in Vmca in more than 10% of time points.

CONCLUSION

Balancing surgical visibility with organ perfusion remains a challenge. The results of this study show that moderate hypotension significantly improves the surgical field; however reducing BP below 60 mmHg may risk cerebral hypoperfusion.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting people for shunting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2013), EMBASE (1980 to August 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to August 2013). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. For this update, we identified two new relevant randomised controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six trials involving 1270 participants in the review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. For most studies, the blinding of outcome assessors and the report of prespecified outcomes were unclear. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Large scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

The impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function

The concept that carotid disease may compromise cognitive function was initially proposed by Fisher in 1951, based on an autopsy case. However, some topics involving cognitive function remain controversial, such as its correlation with carotid obstructive disease. So, the authors of this review evaluate the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function and the repercussions of the revascularization technique (carotid stenting vs. endarterectomy) chosen. It was clear from the literature reviewed that carotid stenosis is related to a decline in cognitive function over time. However, controversy still remains over the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function. With elation to the technique employed (carotid stenting vs. endarterectomy), the majority of studies found no difference between the two techniques in terms of overall cognitive outcome.

Stratification of intraoperative ischemic impact by somatosensory evoked potential monitoring, diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in carotid endarterectomy with routine shunt use

BACKGROUND

Routine shunting to minimize ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to stratify the ischemic parameters associated with CEA and evaluate the effect of routine shunting in attempting to mitigate those ischemia.

METHOD

Data from 248 CEAs with routine shunting were retrospectively evaluated. Our assessment included somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) amplitude reduction more than 50 % and longer than 5 min (SSEP<50%, >5 min), new postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging lesions (new DWI lesions), and severe stenosis as indicated by reduced ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) signal on preoperative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA asymmetry), as surrogates of hypoperfusion, microembli, and hemodynamic impairment, respectively.

RESULTS

SSEP<50%, >5 min occurred in 15 % of CEAs during cross-clamping, and shunting reversed the SSEP changes. New DWI lesions were observed in 4.1 %. Pre-clamping the common and external carotid artery during dissection (pre-clamp method) decreased the rate of new DWI lesions compared to without pre-clamping (3.5 % vs. 7.5 %, P = 0.22). Occlusion time was significantly longer in the pre-clamp method than without pre-clamping (P < 0.0001). However, the incidence of SSEP<50%, >5 min was not increased with the pre-clamp method (p = 1.0) when using information regarding SSEP and collaterals to modify the speed of shunt manipulation. MRA asymmetry was identified in 39 CEAs (15.8 %) with correction of asymmetry postoperatively. MRA asymmetry correlated with symptomatic hyperperfusion (P = 0.0034). Only three CEAs had symptomatic hyperperfusion (1.2 %) with minimal symptoms. Ten CEAs sustained transient ischemia, symptomatic hyperperfusion, or 30-day-stroke (composite postoperative ischemic symptoms). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that SSEP<50%, >5 min (p = 0.009), new DWI lesions (p = 0.004) and MRA asymmetry (p = 0.042) were independent predictors of　composite postoperative ischemic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

SSEP<50%, >5 min, new DWI lesions, and MRA asymmetry were able to stratify the ischemic impacts in CEA. Meticulous routine shunting could mitigate those appropriately.

Improvement and impairment in cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy: comparison of objective and subjective assessments

Objective and subjective assessments of postoperative improvement and impairment in cognition were prospectively compared in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient underwent subjective cognitive assessment by a neurosurgeon and the patient's next of kin, and neuropsychological testing consisting of five test scores within 7 days before surgery and between 1 and 2 months after surgery. Of 213 patients studied, 24 (11%), 166 (78%), and 23 (11%) patients were defined as having subjectively improved, unchanged, and impaired cognition, respectively, following surgery. In all neuropsychological tests, differences in test scores between the two tests (postoperative test score - preoperative test score) significantly differentiated patients with subjectively improved, unchanged, and impaired cognition after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the cut-off point for the differences in neuropsychological test scores in detecting subjective improvement and impairment in cognition after surgery was identical to mean +2 standard deviations (SDs) and mean -2 SDs, respectively, of the control value obtained from normal subjects. Of 27 patients with differences in neuropsychological test scores more than the upper cut-off point and 26 patients with differences in neuropsychological test scores less than the lower cut-off point in one or more neuropsychological tests, 24 (89%) and 23 (88%) exhibited subjectively improved and impaired cognition, respectively, after surgery. The present study indicates that neuropsychological test scores reflect the subjective assessment of postoperative change in cognition, and can detect subjective improvement and impairment in cognition after CEA using the optimal cut-off points for the test scores.

[Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials]

During the last 30 years intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (IOEM) has gained increasing importance in monitoring the function of neuronal structures and the intraoperative detection of impending new neurological deficits. The use of IOEM could reduce the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits after various surgical procedures. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) seem to be superior to other methods for many indications regarding monitoring of the central nervous system. During the application of IOEM general anesthesia should be provided by total intravenous anesthesia with propofol with an emphasis on a continuous high opioid dosage. When intraoperative MEP or electromyography guidance is planned, muscle relaxation must be either completely omitted or maintained in a titrated dose range in a steady state. The IOEM can be performed by surgeons, neurologists and neurophysiologists or increasingly more by anesthesiologists. However, to guarantee a safe application and interpretation, sufficient knowledge of the effects of the surgical procedure and pharmacological and physiological influences on the neurophysiological findings are indispensable.

Local Versus General Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy

Like the earlier multicenter General Anesthesia (GA) versus Local Anaesthesia (LA) for carotid surgery (GALA) trial, a recent independent study showed no difference in transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under LA compared with GA. Besides these outcomes, however, several additional issues may be of interest when comparing the 2 modalities. Examples include the occurrence of post-CEA patient delirium, cognitive dysfunction, and health-related quality of life, as well as the cost-effectiveness, length of hospitalization, and resource utilization. This commentary discusses and compares these outcomes of CEA performed under LA versus GA.

Shunting during carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. While some surgeons advocate routine shunting, others prefer selective shunting or no shunting. Several large series have documented excellent results of CEA with routine shunting or without shunts. Others reported similar results with selective shunting using transcranial Doppler (TCD), electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring, carotid stump pressure (SP), cervical block anesthesia (CBA), and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP). In this study, we review the available evidence supporting shunting, nonshunting, and selective shunting during CEA.

METHODS

An electronic PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted to identify all published CEA studies between January 1990 and December 2010, that analyzed the perioperative outcome of routine shunting, routine nonshunting, routine versus selective shunting, selecting shunting versus avoiding a shunt, and selective shunting based on EEG, TCD, SP, CBA, and SSEP.

RESULTS

The mean reported perioperative stroke rate for CEAs with routine shunting was 1.4% and for routine nonshunt was 2%. Meanwhile, the mean perioperative stroke rates for selecting shunting were 1.6% using EEG, 4.8% using TCD, 1.6% using SP, 1.8% using SSEP, and 1.1% for CBA. Similar results were noted for perioperative stroke and death rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of routine shunting and selective shunting was associated with a low stroke rate. Both methods are acceptable, and the individual surgeon should select the method with which they are more comfortable.

[Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a review]

Cardiovascular diseases are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Carotid artery stenosis causes between 20% and 25% of ischemic strokes, especially when an embolism is the underlying cause. Carotid endarterectomy is the treatment of choice when stenosis exceeds 60%. It is important to have an understanding of how to manage perioperative factors that can decrease the risk of stroke, infarction, and death. In contrast to the findings of earlier meta-analyses, the recent GALA trial of general versus local anesthesia concluded that the rates of stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality during or soon after surgery are similar for both types of anesthesia.

The utility of using the bispectral index-Vista for detecting cross-clamping decline in cerebral blood flow velocity

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis are at risk of cerebral ischemia/hypoperfusion. Criterion recommended by European and American committees to determine whether to place a shunt consisted of a decline in transcranial Doppler ultrasonography-measured middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCBFV) to < 30% to 40% of intraoperative preclamp value.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the discriminative power of the bispectral index (BIS)-Vista monitor for detecting a 40% decline in MCBFV with cross-clamping.

METHODS

In 20 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under remifentanil/propofol anesthesia, BIS-Vista data, MCBFV, and pulsatility index from bilaterally mounted BIS-Vista and transcranial Doppler monitors were continuously recorded.

RESULTS

Coefficient of determination revealed good correlation (r = 0.763) between ipsilateral BIS-Vista and MCBFV after cross-clamping. BIS-Vista exhibited a high discriminative power of 0.850 (95% confidence interval, 0.455-0.966) area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve in detecting an ipsilateral 40% MCBFV decline. Two-way analysis of variance (location by time) suggests that BIS-Vista exhibited a global decline; ie, both BIS-Vistas declined when 1 carotid on either side was clamped because there was no significant interhemispheric difference (P = .112) in mean BIS-Vista values over time.

CONCLUSION

Although we demonstrated good correlation and high discriminative power of the BIS-Vista monitor in depicting a MCBFV decline that could serve as indicator of decline in cerebral activity, BIS-Vista cannot be considered a reliable indicator of cerebral ischemia/hypoperfusion that could replace transcranial Doppler monitoring to determine whether a shunt is to be placed.

Distal cervical carotid artery dissection after carotid endarterectomy: a complication of indwelling shunt

The technical factors and surgical methods employed in carotid endarterectomy are controversial. In particular, whether or not to use an indwelling arterial shunt during carotid endarterectomy remains a source of conflict. We describe a rare case in which uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy was followed by distal internal carotid artery dissection and suggest that this devastating complication was due to intimal damage produced by the use of an indwelling arterial shunt.

Relative hypotension in the beach-chair position: effects on middle cerebral artery blood velocity

When anaesthetising patients for arthroscopic shoulder surgery, it is common practice to sit the patient in the beachchair position and to optimise arthroscopy by allowing relative hypotension. There is little published information regarding the cerebral haemodynamic effects of hypotension in the sitting position during general anaesthesia. In this study, 19 patients scheduled for shoulder surgery were anaesthetised with desflurane. Phenylephrine and/or remifentanil were used to control blood pressure. Cerebral haemodynamics were assessed by monitoring middle cerebral artery blood velocity with transcranial Doppler, and by invasive arterial pressure monitoring with the transducer kept level with the external auditory meatus. Pressure and velocity waveforms were analysed to calculate apparent zero flow pressure and resistance area product. Cerebral haemodynamics in patients anaesthetised supine at the pre-induction blood pressure were compared with haemodynamics while seated at 45 degrees with hypotension. According to our routine practice, blood pressure management was guided by non-invasive measurement of systolic pressure using an arm cuff Changing from supine/normotensive to sitting/hypotensive caused mean arterial pressure at the auditory meatus to decrease 47 +/- 7% and middle cerebral artery blood velocity to decrease 22 +/- 7%. In the beach-chair position, systolic pressure was 96 +/- 10 mmHg in the arm and 76 +/- 10 mmHg at the auditory meatus (P < 0.0001). Both resistance area product and apparent zero flow pressure decreased, suggesting decreases in cerebrovascular resistance and critical closing pressure. Although there was some evidence of an autoregulatory response, middle cerebral artery blood velocity decreased when relative hypotension was induced in patients anaesthetised with desflurane in the beach-chair position.

Wake-up test decrease shunts insertion during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The use of locoregional anesthesia versus general anesthesia (GE) in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been a debatable issue in clinical studies for the past several years. In our study, GE with wake-up tests (WUTs) during carotid cross-clamping was used instead of stump pressure (SP) to directly assess the neurological status of the patient to determine whether shunting was needed. Our study assessed the percentage of patients under light sedation and mechanically ventilated needing shunting based on WUT compared to a systolic stump pressure (SPs) cutoff value of <or=40 mm Hg.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

University hospital clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred fifty-one patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II-III) with carotid artery stenosis scheduled for CEA under GE.

INTERVENTIONS

The WUT was used to assess the neurological status in patients undergoing CEA, which involved the gradual reduction of depth of anesthesia until the patient was capable of responding to a verbal stimulus and provide full collaboration while only receiving remifentanil. A positive WUT indicated that patient was not able to carry out the order.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 343 patients, 20 (5.8%) were shunted due to a positive WUT after cross-clamping in comparison to 45 patients (12.8%) based on the SPs <or=40 mm Hg criteria.

CONCLUSION

Wake-up test can be used to directly assess the neurological status in patients undergoing CEA to determine whether shunting is required. Our results showed that less patients required shunting based on WUT compared to the SP criteria.

How often does an incomplete circle of Willis predispose to cerebral ischemia during closure of carotid artery? Postmortem and clinical imaging studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of anatomical variations in the circle of Willis predisposing to cerebral ischemia during intraoperative closure of a carotid artery.

MATERIALS

Anatomy of the cerebral arteries of 92 deceased was assessed by angiography and permanent silicone casts. Cerebral ischemia during closure of a carotid artery with patent contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) was considered possible in cases of simultaneous nonfunctioning anterior communicating artery (diameter <0.5 mm) and ipsilateral posterior communicating artery (PComA) (diameter <0.5 mm or fetal type posterior cerebral artery). In cases of contralateral ICA occlusion, cerebral ischemia was considered possible if ipsilateral PComA was nonfunctioning.

RESULTS

Cerebral ischemia during closure of the right or left carotid artery with patent contralateral ICA was estimated to be possible in 16 (17.4%) and 13 (14.1%) cases. In cases of occluded contralateral ICA, the corresponding numbers were 55 (59.8%) and 49 (53.3%). A review of magnetic resonance and catheter angiographies also identified other variants of the circle of Willis with increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete circle of Willis predisposes approximately one-sixth of individuals to cerebral ischemia during transient closure of carotid artery but the risk is more than threefold in case of contralateral ICA occlusion.

The GALA Trial: Will It Influence Clinical Practice?

The General Anesthesia vs. Local Anesthesia for Carotid Surgery (GALA) trial did not show a difference in 30-day postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction and death rates between patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local vs. general anesthesia. The present article discusses some limitations of the GALA trial. Firstly, the expected stroke and death rates following CEA is so low, that it was unlikely that the GALA trial would show any significant difference between local and general anesthesia. Secondly, preoperative statin use was not recorded. Thirdly, intraoperative shunt usa ge rates (a possible parameter for the development of stroke) varied considerably between the 2 groups (43% vs. 14%, for general vs. local anesthesia, respectively; P < .0001), as well as between UK and non-UK surgeons who always (73.6% vs. 20.8%, respectively; P < .0001), never (4.2% vs. 26%, respectively; P < .0002), or selectively (22.2% vs. 53.2%, respectively; P < .0001) used a shunt. Furthermore, no information was provided regarding the type of shunts used; for example, atraumatic shunts may be associated with lower perioperative stroke rates. These limitations could influence the interpretation of the results of the GALA trial. Due to lack of differences between the 2 groups and the presence of the above limitations, it seems likely that this trial will have little effect on clinical practice.

Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: a diagnostic tool of increasing utility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since its introduction in 1982, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography has become an important diagnostic and monitoring tool in patients with surgical disease. It has applications in the perioperative period, as well as in the intensive care unit. It is therefore appropriate for the anesthesiologist to maintain an understanding of its current utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transcranial Doppler has an established role in diagnosing cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and for guiding transfusion therapy in children with sickle cell disease. It has application in the preoperative evaluation of patients with cerebrovascular disease, as well as that of an intraoperative monitor in carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. It is useful for detecting right-to-left shunts in settings in which transesophageal echocardiography is not desirable. Its value in settings such as traumatic brain injury, hepatic failure, and migraine headache has yet to be fully clarified.

SUMMARY

Although there are several settings in which transcranial Doppler has well established usefulness, there are many more in which it is likely valuable, such as traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke, and fulminant hepatic failure. Further research is needed in these fields to elucidate the exact role for transcranial Doppler.