Performance of carotid ultrasound in evaluating candidates for carotid endarterectomy is optimized by an approach based on clinical outcome rather than accuracy

Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke and transient ischemic attack. Correctly and rapidly identifying patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is essential for adequate treatment with early cerebral revascularization. Doubts about the diagnostic value regarding the accuracy of duplex ultrasound (DUS) and the possibility of using DUS as the single diagnostic test before carotid revascularization are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the accuracy of DUS in individuals with symptomatic carotid stenosis verified by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CRDTAS, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), ISI Web of Science, HTA, DARE, and LILACS up to 15 February 2021. We handsearched the reference lists of all included studies and other relevant publications and contacted experts in the field to identify additional studies or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing DUS accuracy against an acceptable reference standard (DSA, MRA, or CTA) in symptomatic patients. We considered the classification of carotid stenosis with DUS defined with validated duplex velocity criteria, and the NASCET criteria for carotid stenosis measures on DSA, MRA, and CTA. We excluded studies that included < 70% of symptomatic patients; the time between the index test and the reference standard was longer than four weeks or not described, or that presented no objective criteria to estimate carotid stenosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 domain list. We extracted data with an effort to complete a 2 × 2 table (true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives) for each of the different categories of carotid stenosis and reference standards. We produced forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots to summarize the data. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used a bivariate meta-analysis model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25,087 unique studies, of which 22 were deemed eligible for inclusion (4957 carotid arteries). The risk of bias varied considerably across the studies, and studies were generally of moderate to low quality. We narratively described the results without meta-analysis in seven studies in which the criteria used to determine stenosis were too different from the duplex velocity criteria proposed in our protocol or studies that provided insufficient data to complete a 2 × 2 table for at least in one category of stenosis. Nine studies (2770 carotid arteries) presented DUS versus DSA results for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, and two (685 carotid arteries) presented results from DUS versus CTA in this category. Seven studies presented results for occlusion with DSA as the reference standard and three with CTA as the reference standard. Five studies compared DUS versus DSA for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. Only one study presented results from 50% to 69% carotid artery stenosis. For DUS versus DSA, for < 50% carotid artery stenosis, the summary sensitivity was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.76) and the summary specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99); for the 50% to 69% range, only one study was included and meta-analysis not performed; for the 50% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and the summary specificity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.73); for the 70% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and the summary specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90); for occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) and the summary specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.99). For sensitivity analyses, excluding studies in which participants were selected based on the presence of occlusion on DUS had an impact on specificity: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). For DUS versus CTA, we found two studies in the range of 70% to 99%; the sensitivity varied from 0.57 to 0.94 and the specificity varied from 0.87 to 0.98. For occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and the summary specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.99). For DUS versus MRA, there was one study with results for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.95); in the 70% to 99% range, two studies were included, with sensitivity that varied from 0.54 to 0.99 and specificity that varied from 0.78 to 0.89. We could perform only a few of the proposed sensitivity analyses because of the small number of studies included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that the diagnostic accuracy of DUS is high, especially at discriminating between the presence or absence of significant carotid artery stenosis (< 50% or 50% to 99%). This evidence, plus its less invasive nature, supports the early use of DUS for the detection of carotid artery stenosis. The accuracy for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis and occlusion is high. Clinicians should exercise caution when using DUS as the single preoperative diagnostic method, and the limitations should be considered. There was little evidence of the accuracy of DUS when compared with CTA or MRA. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution because they are based on studies of low methodological quality, mainly due to the patient selection method. Methodological problems in participant inclusion criteria from the studies discussed above apparently influenced an overestimated estimate of prevalence values. Most of the studies included failed to precisely describe inclusion criteria and previous testing. Future diagnostic accuracy studies should include direct comparisons of the various modalities of diagnostic tests (mainly DUS, CTA, and MRA) for carotid artery stenosis since DSA is no longer considered to be the best method for diagnosing carotid stenosis and less invasive tests are now used as reference standards in clinical practice. Also, for future studies, the participant inclusion criteria require careful attention.

Optimal Peak Systolic Velocity Threshold at Duplex US for Determining the Need for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Decision Analytic Approach

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal peak systolic velocity (PSV) threshold at duplex ultrasonography (US) required to establish the need for carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients on the basis of the long-term cost-effectiveness outcomes of diagnostic testing and subsequent treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1997 through January 2000, a prospective medical ethics committee-approved multicenter study was conducted. After giving informed consent, patients with amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, or minor stroke who underwent duplex US and digital subtraction angiography were included in the study. Selective ipsilateral carotid angiograms were obtained in at least three planes. Arteries that were nearly or totally occluded at duplex US were excluded because the PSV cannot be reliably measured in these vessels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the diagnoses of 70%-99% and 50%-99% stenoses. Optimal likelihood ratios were calculated on the basis of lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years derived at cost-effectiveness analysis and the prevalence of disease. The associated optimal sensitivities, specificities, and PSV thresholds were derived from the ROC curves.

RESULTS

In this clinical study, 350 patients were included. The nonoccluded arteries in a total of 236 patients were assessable for ROC analysis. For the diagnosis of 70%-99% stenosis, the optimal likelihood ratio was 0.21, which was associated with a PSV threshold of 220 cm/sec, a sensitivity of 97% (127 of 131 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%, 100%), and a specificity of 48% (50 of 105 patients; 95% CI: 38%, 57%). For the diagnosis of 50%-99% stenosis, the optimal likelihood ratio was 0.38, which was associated with a PSV threshold of 180 cm/sec, a sensitivity of 95% (182 of 191 patients; 95% CI: 92%, 98%), and a specificity of 69% (31 of 45 patients; 95% CI: 55%, 82%).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the lifetime outcomes of diagnostic testing and subsequent treatment, the optimal PSV thresholds for the diagnosis of 70%-99% and 50%-99% carotid artery stenoses in patients with amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, or minor stroke were 220 cm/sec and 180 cm/sec, respectively.

Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement

OBJECTIVE

The study was conducted to assess the error and variability that results from human factors in Doppler peak velocity measurement. The positioning of the Doppler sample volume in the vessel, adjustment of the Doppler gain and angle, and choice of waveform display size were investigated. We hypothesized that even experienced vascular technologists in a laboratory accredited by the Intersocietal Commission for Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories make significant errors and have significant variability in the subjective adjustments made during measurements.

METHODS

Problems of patient variability were avoided by having the four technologists measure peak velocities from an in vitro pulsatile flow model with unstenosed and 61% stenosed tubes. To evaluate inaccurate angle and sample volume positioning, a probe holder was used in some of the experiments to fix the Doppler angle at 60 degrees. The effect of Doppler gain was studied at three settings--low, ideal, and saturated gains--that were standardized from the ideal level chosen by consensus amongst the technologists. Two waveform display sizes were also investigated. Peak velocity measurement was assessed by comparison with true peak velocities. For each variable studied, average peak velocities were calculated from the 10 measurements made by each technologist and used to find the percent error from the true value, and the coefficient of variation was used to measure the variability.

RESULTS

Doppler angle, sample volume placement, and the Doppler gain were the most significant sources of error and variability. Inaccurate angle and placement increased the variability in measurements from 1% to 2% (range) to 4% to 6% for the straight tube and from 1% to 2% to 3% to 9% for the 61% stenosis. The peak velocity error was increased from 9% to 13% to 7% to 28% for the stenosis. Both measurement error and variability were strongly dependent on the Doppler gain level. At low gain, the error was approximately 10% less than the true value and at saturated gain, 20% greater. The display size only affected measurements from the stenosed tube, increasing the error from 9% to 13% to 15% to 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Major factors affecting Doppler peak velocity measurement error and variability were identified. Inaccurate angle and sample volume placement increased the variability. The presence of a stenosis was found to increase the measurement errors. The error was found to depend on the Doppler gain setting, with greater variability at low and saturated gains and on the display size with a stenosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Doppler ultrasound peak velocity measurements are widely used for the diagnostic assessment of the severity of arterial stenoses. However, it is known that these measurements are often in error. We have identified subjective human factors introduced by the technologist and assessed their contribution to peak velocity measurement error and variability. It is to be hoped that by understanding this, improvements in the machine design and measurement methods can be made that will result in improved measurement accuracy and reproducibility.

B-flow imaging of internal carotid artery stenosis: Comparison with power Doppler imaging and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis, but it has a relatively high complication rate. We evaluated the efficacy of B-flow imaging (BFI) in examining internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) compared with power Doppler imaging (PDI) and DSA.

METHODS

We performed BFI, PDI, and DSA on 56 consecutive patients with suspected ICAS. The degree of stenosis was calculated for each technique, and results of BFI and PDI were then correlated with those of DSA.

RESULTS

Measurements of the percentage of stenosis made using both sonographic techniques were significantly correlated with those of DSA (p < 0.0001). However, the coefficient of correlation between DSA and BFI (r = 0.94) was higher than that between DSA and PDI (r = 0.87). The mean difference between ICAS measurements with BFI and DSA was -1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.5 to 0). The mean difference between ICAS measurements with PDI and DSA was -6.5% (95% CI, -8.2 to -4.7). ICAS was graded significantly lower on PDI than on DSA, whereas BFI findings were similar to those of DSA.

CONCLUSION

BFI shows high correlation with DSA and provides a more accurate planimetric evaluation of ICAS than PDI does.

Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy

The risk of ischemic stroke increases proportionately to the severity of carotid stenosis, and carotid endarterectomy is a durable procedure that reduces this risk. Although a combination of noninvasive tests, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), have low misclassification rates compared with invasive angiography, the need for invasive angiography may not yet be obviated. Ultrasound appears to be a cost-effective screening strategy for a significant carotid stenosis that warrants angiographic confirmation and possible intervention. A combination of ultrasound and MRA appears to be the most common clinical pathway that can be accurate and cost-effective, if rigorous local validation of diagnostic criteria is performed. Ultrasound further supplements angiography by providing information about plaque morphology and physiologic measurements of collateralization of flow and vasomotor reactivity when additional tests, such as transcranial Doppler, are performed. Ultrasound and various angiographic imaging modalities have complementary value in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. Currently, more invasive angiograms are being performed, due to a variety of new experimental interventions such as angioplasty and stenting, a subject of current clinical trials.

Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine optimal duplex sonographic criteria for use in our institution for diagnosing severe carotid stenoses and to correlate those findings with angiographic measurements obtained by the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), and Common Carotid (CC) methods of grading carotid stenoses.

METHODS

We analyzed the angiographic data using the ECST, NASCET, and CC methods and compared the results with the duplex sonographic findings. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the duplex sonographic method. Taking these parameters into account, the optimal intrastenotic peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) were derived for diagnosing severe stenoses according to the 3 angiographic methods.

RESULTS

Optimal PSV and EDV values for diagnosing a 70% or greater stenosis in our laboratory were as follows: with the NASCET method of angiographic grading of stenoses, PSV 220 cm/second or greater and EDV 80 cm/second or greater, and with the ECST and CC methods, PSV 190 cm/second or greater, and EDV 65 cm/second or greater. The optimal PSV and EDV for diagnosing a stenosis of 80% or greater with the ECST grading method were 215 cm/second or greater and 90 cm/second or greater, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Duplex sonography is a sensitive and accurate tool for evaluating severe carotid stenoses. Optimal PSVs and EDVs vary according to the angiographic method used to grade the stenosis. They are similar for stenoses 70% or greater with the NASCET method and for stenoses 80% or greater with the ECST method.

Grading of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Validation of Doppler/Duplex Ultrasound Criteria and Angiography Against Endarterectomy Specimen

OBJECTIVES

duplex ultrasound has replaced angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in many institutions. However, the indications for CEA are based on angiographically controlled studies and widely accepted ultrasound criteria do not exist. Consequently, the reliability of Doppler and/or duplex ultrasound to predict a high-grade ICA stenosis has to be proven.

DESIGN

prospective validation study.

MATERIALS

one hundred and fifty carotid bifurcations assessed by ultrasound and selective angiography and 68 acrylat outcasts of carotid specimen after eversion CEA.

METHODS

ICA stenosis was measured angiographically according to the ECST criteria. Combined Doppler acoustic standard criteria (CDASC), peak systolic frequency (PSF), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) served as criteria for the ultrasound assessment. These criteria and the results of angiography were compared to the degree of ICA stenosis determined by specimen measurements.

RESULTS

the median degree of ICA stenosis as assessed by angiography (82%, range 56-97%) and CDASC (83%, range 50-99%) corresponded well to the specimen measurements (80%, range 50-95%). The sensitivity of angiography and CDASC to predict a 70-90% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria) compared to the specimen measurements was 88% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) reached 92% and 96%, respectively. CDASC were equivalent to angiography and were superior to the best single frequency or velocity parameters. If CDASC do not indicate a >/=70% ICA stenosis in spite of a PSV >/=180 cm/s and/or an EDV >/=50 cm/s, angiography may detect patients with a >70% ICA stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CDASC are valid in the quantification of high-grade ICA stenosis. They are more reliable than single velocity and/or frequency measurements. However, if velocity criteria and CDASC do not agree, angiography should be performed.

Results of carotid endarterectomy performed with preoperative duplex ultrasound assessment alone

Contrast injection cerebral angiography has been considered for several decades the "gold-standard" technique for diagnosis and operative planning of carotid disease. More recently, however, an increasing number of institutions are using duplex ultrasound as the single independent preoperative test. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of the utilization of duplex ultrasonography as the only preoperative test on the outcome of the procedure. Between 1993 and 1996, the authors performed 1,149 carotid procedures. Duplex ultrasound as the only preoperative test was employed with increasing frequency in a total of 728 cases. In 1995 and 1996, a cerebral arteriogram was performed only if duplex ultrasound was technically inadequate or questionable or showed an atypical pattern of disease. During the 4 years analyzed in this study, the number of the procedures increased from 165 in 1993 to 412 in 1996. The thirty-day mortality rate was 0.43%, and neurologic morbidity was 1.65%. According to the year in which the procedure was performed, the mortality/morbidity rates were 1.2/2.4 in 1993, 0.52/2.08 in 1994, 0.26/1.57 in 1995, and 0.24/1.21 in 1996. Indication to perform an arteriogram became very selective in 1995. Regardless of these changes in the diagnostic work-up, some degree of reduction in both 30-day mortality and neurologic morbidity was recorded. Considering a cost of 724 European Currency Units (ECU) per arteriogram, 527,072 ECU were saved in this period. In the last 4 years, duplex ultrasound has replaced arteriography as the first-choice technique for preoperative assessment of carotid disease at the authors' institution. There was definitely no detrimental effect on the clinical results that, on the contrary, improved during the same period. This policy has allowed a significant reduction in the cost of the procedure and has most likely prevented several arteriography-related complications. The authors recommend this policy to all institutions in which accurate duplex ultrasound is available.

Color-coded duplex ultrasound compared to CT angiography for detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare findings on color-coded duplex ultrasound and CT angiography for grading internal carotid artery stenosis, and to investigate whether both these imaging modalities are necessary for an accurate diagnosis of carotid stenosis in the pre-surgical assessment of the internal carotid artery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 92 internal carotid arteries from 46 randomly chosen patients with suspected carotid stenosis by color-coded duplex ultrasound and by three-dimensional CT angiography (CTA). This retrospective study adhered to international guidelines with gradings of mild, moderate, severe, and occlusive carotid disease.

RESULTS

The study demonstrated agreement between the degree of stenosis found on color-coded duplex ultrasound and that found on CTA in 78% of cases overall and in 79% of patients requiring surgical intervention. When compared to CTA, color-coded duplex ultrasound yielded a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 96.3%. Although findings on color-coded duplex ultrasound and CTA were comparable, disagreement affecting treatment decision occurred in 10:92 arteries.

CONCLUSION

CTA was not found to be beneficial for patients exhibiting mild stenosis on color-coded duplex ultrasound, as none of the mild groupings found by sonography were interpreted as severe or occluded by CTA. However, CTA may be an important adjunct to color-coded duplex ultrasound regarding the categories of moderate, severe and occluded when carotid endarterectomy is considered.

Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE

To determine if duplex ultrasonography (US) can help predict the degree of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the ratio of the PSV in the ICA to that in the ipsilateral common carotid artery (VICA/VCCA) were compared with the degree of arteriographically measured stenosis. ICAs were arteriographically subgrouped at 10% incremental levels of stenosis and broader ranges. Mean PSV, VICA/VCCA, and SDs were calculated for each category. Histograms showing the numbers of stenotic ICAs in subgroups and for vessels with stenoses of greater than or equal to or less than 70% narrowing were constructed. The number of vessels correctly subgrouped with typical Doppler US thresholds was calculated.

RESULTS

Mean PSV and VICA/VCCA increased with stenosis level (P < .01); SDs were wide. Histograms showed Doppler US values in the central groups across all disease levels. Histograms differentiating at least or less than 70% stenosis showed minimal overlap. PSV and VICA/VCCA helped classify, respectively, 185 and 181 of 204 vessels with stenoses of less than 50%, 15 and 21 of 46 vessels with stenoses of 50%-69%, and 73 and 67 of 84 vessels with stenoses of 70% or greater. When classifying stenoses as 69% or less or 70% or more, PSV and VICA/VCCA were correct in 90.6% and 90.3% of vessels.

CONCLUSION

Doppler US is excellent for classifying stenoses as above or below a single degree of severity but does not function well in stenosis subclassification.

Anthropomorphic carotid bifurcation phantom for MRI applications

Anthropomorphic carotid bifurcation flow phantoms that incorporate different stenotic geometries within the internal carotid artery have been developed. This technique produces high-fidelity, life-size vascular flow models that are compatible with magnetic resonance techniques. The models, in conjunction with a computer-controlled flow pump, address the need for a complex vascular geometry that can be used to verify magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques that quantify stenosis severity and blood flow. Stenotic geometries, with up to 80% diameter reduction, have been fabricated in two different phantom materials. Plastic phantoms provide a durable, rigid geometry where the absolute dimensions of the model are well known. Agar gel phantoms provide tissue-like signal (T1, T2) up to the lumen boundary and are also compatible with ultrasound techniques. In this paper the technique to produce vascular flow phantoms is outlined and the compatibility of these phantoms with MRA techniques is demonstrated. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:533-544.

Selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was the definition of the duplex scan parameters that best select patients for carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

This study was set in a regional vascular unit. Duplex scanning and angiography were performed prospectively on 50 patients who were symptomatic (100 carotid bifurcation) to identify the most accurate and sensitive duplex scan criteria to identify an 80% to 99% stenosis according to the European Carotid Symptomatic Trial. With data from the European Carotid Symptomatic Trial, we estimated the effect of three different approaches used to select patients for carotid endarterectomy. The first approach was the selection of patients for carotid surgery on the basis of duplex scanning alone with the most accurate duplex scan criteria (approach I). The second approach was the selection of patients for carotid surgery on the basis of duplex scanning alone with a 100% sensitive duplex scan criteria (approach II). The third approach was the selection of patients for angiography with duplex scanning (100% sensitive criteria) and then the use of angiography to define which patients should undergo surgery (approach III).

RESULTS

All three approaches appeared to have a similar potential in stroke reduction. However, approach I, which minimized the number of patients who underwent surgery (19% less than approach II) or invasive imaging (65% less than approach III), appeared to be the most appropriate.

CONCLUSION

These data support the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scanning alone. The duplex scan criteria should be validated against angiography.

Complete MR angiography and Doppler ultrasound as the sole imaging modalities prior to carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the combination of duplex Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and complete carotid magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the non-invasive imaging of carotid disease and their effect on outcomes. Determine inter-reader agreement of carotid MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred and ten carotid bifurcations were evaluated using DUS, 2D and 3D time-of-flight MRA from the aortic arch to the Circle of Willis in 55 patients. Percentage stenoses were determined by two blinded readers using standardized criteria. Clinical follow-up was by chart review.

RESULTS

Correlation of Doppler and MRA was excellent (r=0.903, P<0.001). Inter-reader agreement (K) for MRA was good: internal carotid artery (ICA) (0.750), external carotid artery (ECA) (0.674) and common carotid artery (CCA) (0.410). Differences in CCA readings were due to minor differences in categorizing lesions as CCA versus ICA or ECA. MRA and Doppler detected nine occluded ICAs. Two DUS occlusions had ICA flow by MRA; one due to a reconstituted precavernous ICA, one a near occluded vessel. Five patients (9%) had surgical management modified by MRA with four not having surgery: three distal ICA/Siphon occlusions and one less severe stenosis by MRA. One tandem lesion not visualized by DUS was surgically significant. Nine aortic arch abnormalities had no surgical impact, possibly due to small sample size. Of 41 endarterectomies, there were no complications from errors of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Carotid MRA correlates well with DUS with good inter-reader agreement. MRA confirms Doppler findings, expands anatomical information and identifies tandem lesions from the aortic arch to the Circle of Willis which can affect surgical management. This approach to carotid artery imaging appears to have no negative effect on surgical outcome.