Outcome of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Prognostic value of non-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation after VT ablation to predict VT recurrences

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of (non)-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS) to predict recurrences of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is under discussion. Optimal endpoints of VT ablation are not well defined, and optimal timepoint of NIPS is unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of programmed ventricular stimulation at the end of the VT ablation procedure (PVS) and NIPS after VT ablation to identify patients at high risk for VT recurrence.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and February 2022, consecutive patients with VT and structural heart disease undergoing first VT ablation and consecutive NIPS were included. In total, 138 patients were included. All patients underwent NIPS through their implanted ICDs after a median of 3 (1-5) days after ablation (at least 2 drive cycle lengths (500 and 400 ms) and up to four right ventricular extrastimuli until refractoriness). Clinical VT was defined by comparison with 12-lead electrocardiograms and stored ICD electrograms from spontaneous VT episodes. Patients were followed for a median of 37 (13-61) months.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients, 104 were non-inducible (75%), 27 were inducible for non-clinical VTs (20%), and 7 for clinical VT (5%). In 107 patients (78%), concordant results of PVS and NIPS were observed. After 37 ± 20 months, the recurrence rate for any ventricular arrhythmia was 40% (normal NIPS 29% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 66%; log-rank p = 0.001) and for clinical VT was 3% (normal NIPS 1% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 9%; log-rank p = 0.045). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of NIPS were higher compared to PVS (PPV: 65% vs. 46% and NPV: 68% vs. 61%). NIPS revealed the highest NPV among patients with ICM and LVEF > 35%. Patients with inducible VT during NIPS had the highest VT recurrences and overall mortality. Patients with both negative PVS and NIPS had the lowest any VT recurrence rates with 32%. Early re-ablation of patients with recurrent VTs during index hospitalization was feasible but did not reveal better long-term VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients after VT ablation and structural heart disease, NIPS is superior to post-ablation PVS to stratify the risk of VT recurrences. The PPV and NPV of NIPS at day 3 were superior compared to PVS at the end of the procedure to predict recurrent VT, especially in patients with ICM.

Antiarrhythmic Mechanisms of Epidural Blockade After Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been shown to reduce the burden of ventricular tachycardia in small case series of patients with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. However, its electrophysiological and autonomic effects in diseased hearts remain unclear, and its use after myocardial infarction is limited by concerns for potential right ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was created in Yorkshire pigs (N=22) by left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. Approximately, six weeks after myocardial infarction, an epidural catheter was placed at the C7-T1 vertebral level for injection of 2% lidocaine. Right and left ventricular hemodynamics were recorded using Millar pressure-conductance catheters, and ventricular activation recovery intervals (ARIs), a surrogate of action potential durations, by a 56-electrode sock and 64-electrode basket catheter. Hemodynamics and ARIs, baroreflex sensitivity and intrinsic cardiac neural activity, and ventricular effective refractory periods and slope of restitution (Smax) were assessed before and after TEA. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility was assessed by programmed electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

TEA reduced inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias by 70%. TEA did not affect right ventricular-systolic pressure or contractility, although left ventricular-systolic pressure and contractility decreased modestly. Global and regional ventricular ARIs increased, including in scar and border zone regions post-TEA. TEA reduced ARI dispersion specifically in border zone regions. Ventricular effective refractory periods prolonged significantly at critical sites of arrhythmogenesis, and Smax was reduced. Interestingly, TEA significantly improved cardiac vagal function, as measured by both baroreflex sensitivity and intrinsic cardiac neural activity.

CONCLUSIONS

TEA does not compromise right ventricular function in infarcted hearts. Its antiarrhythmic mechanisms are mediated by increases in ventricular effective refractory period and ARIs, decreases in Smax, and reductions in border zone electrophysiological heterogeneities. TEA improves parasympathetic function, which may independently underlie some of its observed antiarrhythmic mechanisms. This study provides novel insights into the antiarrhythmic mechanisms of TEA while highlighting its applicability to the clinical setting.

Recurrent monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in a patient with myocarditis-Importance of understanding and targeting midmyocardial anatomic substrate

INTRODUCTION

Patients with viral myocarditis can present with challenging life-threatening arrhythmias. Catheter ablation can be a life-saving procedure in some patients with recurrent drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A patient with three prior ablations targeting two different monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MMVTs) presented with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). Consequently, he underwent epicardial mapping with adjuvant AI-enabled CT images with the creation of a three-dimensional model, which demonstrated a midmyocardial scar. Fractionated potentials were noted during mapping in this region, and entrainment suggested an inner loop. Interestingly, pacing showed two different QRS morphologies identical to his previously ablated VTs with a long stim-QRS at this region. Epicardial ablation carried on during the VT successfully terminated it, but the VT remained inducible and required endocardial ablation to make it noninducible.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing possible three-dimensional VT circuits in some patients and the need to understand and target mid-myocardial substrate from both the endocardium and epicardium to achieve the elimination of the VT circuits.

Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score matched analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity-score matched population of ICM or NICM patients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank p=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], p=0.004), NYHA class III/IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], p=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], p=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality did not differ.

Pre- and post-procedural cardiac imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) in electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology

Imaging using cardiac computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important option for anatomic and substrate delineation in complex atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. Computed tomography more common than MR has been used to detect procedure-associated complications such as oesophageal, cerebral, and vascular injury. This clinical consensus statement summarizes the current knowledge of CT and MR to facilitate electrophysiological procedures, the current value of real-time integration of imaging-derived anatomy, and substrate information during the procedure and the current role of CT and MR in diagnosing relevant procedure-related complications. Practical advice on potential advantages of one imaging modality over the other is discussed for patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices as well as for planning, intraprocedural integration, and post-interventional management in AF and VT ablation patients. Establishing a team of electrophysiologists and cardiac imaging specialists working on specific details of imaging for complex ablation procedures is key. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can safely be performed in most patients with implanted active cardiac devices. Standard procedures for pre- and post-scanning management of the device and potential CMR-associated device malfunctions need to be in place. In VT patients, imaging-specifically MR-may help to determine scar location and mural distribution in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy beyond evaluating the underlying structural heart disease. Future directions in imaging may include the ability to register multiple imaging modalities and novel high-resolution modalities, but also refinements of imaging-guided ablation strategies are expected.

Inducibility of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardia's during a Successful Ablation Procedure Is a Marker of Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence

Even after a successful ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA), some patients have recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) during their follow-up. We assessed the long-term predictors of recurrent VT after having a successful VTA. The patients who underwent a successful VTA (defined as the non-inducibility of any VT at the procedure's end) in 2014-2021 at our center in Israel were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 111 successful VTAs were evaluated. Out of them, 31 (27.9%) had a recurrent event of VT after the procedure during a median follow-up time of 264 days. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower among patients with recurrent VT events (28.9 ± 12.67 vs. 23.53 ± 12.224, p = 0.048). A high number of induced VTs (>two) during the procedure was found to be a significant predictor of VT recurrence (24.69% vs. 56.67%, 20 vs. 17, p = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, a lower LVEF (HR, 0.964; p = 0.037) and a high number of induced VTs (HR, 2.15; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. The inducibility of more than two VTs during a VTA procedure remains a predictor of VT recurrence even after a successful VT ablation. This group of patients remains at high risk for VT and should be followed up with and treated more vigorously.

Electrical Storm Has Worse Prognosis Compared to Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after VT Ablation

Background: Electrical storm (ES) represents a serious heart rhythm disorder. This study investigates the impact of ES on acute ablation success and long-term outcomes after VT ablation compared to non-ES patients. Methods: In this large single-centre study, patients presenting with ES and undergoing VT ablation from June 2018 to April 2021 were compared to patients undergoing VT ablation due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias but without ES. The primary prognostic outcome was VT recurrence, and secondary endpoints were rehospitalization rates and cardiovascular mortality, all after a median follow-up of 22 months. Results: A total of 311 patients underwent a first VT ablation due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and were included (63 ± 14 years; 86% male). Of these, 108 presented with ES. In the ES cohort, dilated cardiomyopathy as underlying heart disease was significantly higher (p = 0.008). Major complications were equal across both groups (all p > 0.05). Ablation of the clinical VT was achieved in 94% of all patients (p > 0.05). Noninducibility of any VT was achieved in 91% without ES and in 76% with ES (p = 0.001). Patients with ES revealed increased VT recurrence rates during follow-up (65% vs. 40%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 1.841, 95% CI 1.289–2.628; p = 0.001). Furthermore, ES patients suffered from increased rehospitalization rates (73% vs. 48%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 1.948, 95% CI 1.415–2.682; p = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (18% vs. 9%; log rank p = 0.045; HR 1.948, 95% CI 1.004–3.780; p = 0.049). After multivariable adjustment, ES was a strong independent predictor of VT recurrence and rehospitalization rates, but not for mortality. In a propensity score-matched cohort, patients with ES still had a higher risk of VT recurrences and rehospitalizations compared to non-ES patients. Conclusions: VT ablation in patients with ES is challenging and these patients reveal the highest risk for recurrent VTs, rehospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. These patients need close follow-ups and optimal guideline-directed therapy.

Sinus Rhythm Electrocardiographic Abnormalities, Sites of Origin, and Ablation Outcomes of Ventricular Premature Depolarizations Initiating Ventricular Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) can be initiated by ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) in the absence of obvious structural abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of 12-lead ECG sinus rhythm reduced QRS amplitude, QRS fractionation (QRSf) and early repolarization (ER) pattern, and the outcome of catheter ablation and VPD anatomic distribution in patients with VPDs initiating VF.

METHODS

We compared a cohort with no apparent structural heart disease and VPDs initiating VF (Group 1, n=42) to a reference cohort (Group 2, n=61) of patients with no structural heart disease and symptomatic unifocal VPDs.

RESULTS

A reduced QRS amplitude (<.55 mV) in aVF (59 % vs 10%, p<0.001), QRSf in ≥2 contiguous leads (50% vs 16%, p<0.001) and early repolarization pattern (21.4% vs 1.6%, p=0.01) were more common in Group 1 vs Group 2. At least one abnormal ECG finding was present in 34 (81%) Group 1 vs 17 (28%) Group 2 patients, (p<0.001). VPD origin included RV and LV distal Purkinje system and moderator band/ papillary muscles, in 83% Group 1 vs 18% Group 2 patients, p<0.001. VF was eliminated with single ablation procedure in 77% of Group 1 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduced QRS amplitude (<.55 mV) in aVF, QRS fractionation in ≥2 contiguous leads and/or an early repolarization pattern are frequently observed in patients with VPDs initiating VF. VPDs initiating VF typically originate from the distal Purkinje system and papillary muscles and can be successfully eliminated with catheter ablation.

Head-to-Head Comparison of T1 Mapping and Electroanatomical Voltage Mapping in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) has been compared with late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR), which cannot delineate diffuse fibrosis. T1-mapping CMR overcomes the limitations of LGE-CMR, but it has not been directly compared against EAVM.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the relationship between left ventricular (LV) endocardial voltage obtained by EAVM and extracellular volume (ECV) obtained by T1 mapping.

METHODS

The study investigated patients who underwent endocardial EAVM for ventricular arrhythmias (CARTO 3, Biosense Webster) together with preprocedural contrast-enhanced T1 mapping (Ingenia 3T, Philips Healthcare). After image integration, EAVM datapoints were projected onto LGE-CMR and ECV-encoded images. Average values of unipolar voltage (UV), bipolar voltage (BV), LGE transmurality, and ECV were merged from corresponding cardiac segments (6 per slice) and pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 628 segments from 18 patients (57 ± 13 years of age, 17% females, LV ejection fraction 48% ± 14%, nonischemic/ischemic cardiomyopathy/controls: 8/6/4 patients). Based on the 95th and 5th percentile values obtained from the controls, ECV >33%, BV <2.9 mV, and UV <6.7 mV were considered abnormal. There was a significant inverse association between voltage and ECV, but only in segments with abnormal ECV. Increased ECV could predict abnormal BV and UV with acceptable accuracy (area under the curve of 0.78 [95% CI: 0.74-0.83] and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.79-0.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a significant inverse relationship between LV endocardial voltage and ECV. Real-time integration of T1 mapping may guide catheter mapping and may allow identification of areas of diffuse fibrosis potentially related to ventricular arrhythmias.

Outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in non-ischemic idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available trials regarding the outcomes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM).

Methods

A comprehensive database search of large four electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Institute for Scientific Information network meta-analysis, identified five studies enrolling 666 patients for patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) underwent catheter ablation (CA) for VT. The short-term outcomes assessed included procedural success, VT non-inducibility and procedural complications, whereas the long-term outcomes assessed included VT recurrence, heart transplantation, antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) use after ablation and death.

Results

A total of 5 observational studies reported outcomes in 666 patients with NIDCM undergoing VT CA. The complete procedural success was moderately high; 65.5% of the patients (95% CI 0.402- 0.857, p &lt; 0.001) and the procedural complications occurred in 5.8% of the patients (95% CI 0.040–0.076, P = 0.685). Epicardial mapping and ablation were performed among 61.5% and 37% of patients with NIDCM respectively. During a follow up period of 12 to 45 months, there were VT recurrence in 34.2% of the patients (95% CI 0.301–0.465, p &lt; 0.080), death in 20.2% of the patients (95% CI 0.059–0.283, p &lt; 0.017) and heart transplantation in 12.9% of the patients (95% CI −0.026–0.245, P &lt; 0.012).

Conclusion

Ventricular tachycardia CA is effective and safe approach for management of patients with NIDCM with the epicardial approach to be considered as initial strategy especially in presence of ECG and CMR findings suggestive of epicardial substrate. A multicenter randomized trial is crucial to look at the short- and long-term outcomes of VT ablation in NIDCM especially with the advances in mapping and ablation techniques and predictors of success.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult to treat, and long-term outcome data are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality or heart transplantation (HTx) and VT recurrence.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with DCM accepted for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of VT at 9 centers were prospectively enrolled and followed.

RESULTS

Of 281 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 13 years, 85% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 36% ± 12%), 35% had VT storm, 20% had incessant VT, and amiodarone was unsuccessful in 68%. During follow-up of 21 months (IQR: 6-30 months), 67 patients (24%) died or underwent HTx, and 138 (49%) had VT recurrence (45 within 30 days, defined as early); the 4-year rate of VT recurrence or mortality or HTx was 70%. Independent predictors of mortality or HTx were early VT recurrence (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.37-6.21; P < 0.01), amiodarone at discharge (HR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.43-7.33; P < 0.01), renal dysfunction (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.01-3.64; P = 0.046), and LVEF (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.0-1.84; P = 0.052). LVEF ≤32% identified patients at risk for mortality or HTx (area under the curve: 0.75). Mortality or HTx per 100 person-years was 40.4 events after early, compared with 14.2 events after later VT recurrence and 8.5 events with no VT recurrence after RFCA (P < 0.01 for both). Patients with early recurrence and LVEFs ≤32% had a 1-year rate of mortality or HTx of 55%. VT recurrence was predicted by prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, basal anteroseptal VT origin, and procedural failure but not LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DCM needing RFCA for VT are a high-risk group. Following RFCA, approximately one-half remain free of VT recurrence. Early VT recurrence with LVEF ≤32% identifies those at very high risk for mortality or HTx, and screening for mechanical support or HTx should be considered. Late VT recurrence after RFCA does not predict worse outcome.

Long-Term Outcomes after Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Dilated vs. Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Ischemic (ICM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) represent the two main underlying heart diseases in patients referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). While VT ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy is relatively well-studied, data in patients with DCM are still scarce. The study aimed to compare the acute and long-term outcomes in patients with ICM and DCM who underwent VT ablation at a high-volume center. Consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation from April 2018 to April 2021 were included retrospectively. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy were compared to those with dilated cardiomyopathy. The primary endpoint was rate of VT recurrences, the secondary endpoints included overall mortality, rehospitalization because of cardiac condition (VT, acute heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, heart transplantation or implantation of left ventricular assisting device), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at long-term follow-up. A total of 225 patients admitted for first VT ablation were included. A total of 156 patients (69%) revealed ICM and 69 (31%) DCM. After a mean follow-up of 22 months, the primary endpoint of VT recurrence occurred significantly more often in the patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (ICM n = 47; 37% vs. DCM n = 34; 64%; p = 0.001). In regard to the secondary endpoint of overall mortality, there was no difference between the two patient cohorts (DCM n = 9; 15% vs. ICM n = 22; 16%; p = 0.677); the patients with DCM showed significantly higher rehospitalization rates due to cardiac conditions (75% vs. 59%; p = 0.038) and more frequent MACE (68% vs. 52%; p= 0.036). In a Cox regression model, electrical storm at admission was shown to be a predictor for VT recurrence after successful catheter ablation (HR = 1.942: 95% CI 1.237–3.050; p = 0.004), while the ablation of every induced VT morphology during the procedure (HR = 0.522; 95% CI = 0.307–0.885; p = 0.016) contributed to a positive long-term outcome. DCM is associated with a higher risk of VT recurrence after catheter ablation compared to ICM. Furthermore, patients with DCM are more frequent re-hospitalized in the majority of cases due the VT recurrence. There is no difference in the long-term mortality between the two cohorts.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy: An Alternative Option for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia to Drug and Ablation Therapy

Refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) often occurs in the context of organic heart disease. It is associated with significantly high mortality and morbidity rates. Antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation represent the two main treatment options for refractory VT, but their use can be associated with inadequate therapeutic responses and procedure-related complications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is extensively applied in the precision treatment of solid tumors, with excellent therapeutic responses. Recently, this highly precise technology has been applied for radioablation of VT, and its early results demonstrate a favorable safety profile. This review presents the potential value of SBRT in refractory VT.

Feasibility of an Automatic Ultrasonographic Image Acquisition System Associated With an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Real-Time Monitoring of Cardiac Motion During Cardiac Radio-Ablation

Background

The management of the cardio-respiratory motion of the target and the reduction of the uncertainties related to patient's positioning are two of the main challenges that stereotactic arrhythmia radio-ablation (STAR) has to overcome. A prototype of a system was developed that can automatically acquire and interpret echocardiographic images using an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to calculate cardiac displacement in real-time.

Methods

We conducted a single center study enrolling consecutive patients with a history of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in order to evaluate the feasibility of this automatic acquisition system. Echocardiographic images were automatically acquired from the parasternal and apical views with a dedicated probe. The system was designed to hold the probe fixed to the chest in the supine position during both free-breathing and short expiratory breath-hold sequences, to simulate STAR treatment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients reaching a score ≥2 in a multi-parametric assessment evaluating the quality of automatically acquired images. Moreover, we investigated the potential impact of clinical and demographic characteristics on achieving the primary endpoint.

Results

We enrolled 24 patients (63 ± 14 years, 21% females). All of them had a history of VA and 21 (88%) had an ICD. Eight patients (33%) had coronary artery disease, 12 (50%) had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 3 had idiopathic VA. Parasternal, as well as apical images were obtained from all patients except from one, in whom parasternal view could not be collected due to the patient's inability to maintain the supine position. The primary endpoint was achieved in 23 patients (96%) for the apical view, in 20 patients (87%) for the parasternal view, and in all patients in at least one of the two views. The images' quality was maximal (i.e., score = 4) in at least one of the two windows in 19 patients (79%). Atrial fibrillation arrhythmia was the only clinical characteristics associated with a poor score outcome in both imaging windows (apical p = 0.022, parasternal p = 0.014).

Conclusions

These results provide the proof-of-concept for the feasibility of an automatic ultrasonographic image acquisition system associated with an AI algorithm for real-time monitoring of cardiac motion in patients with a history of VA.

Outcomes Associated With Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Importance

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with high mortality in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and medical management of CS-associated VT is limited by high failure rates. The role of catheter ablation has been investigated in small, single-center studies.

Objective

To investigate outcomes associated with VT ablation in patients with CS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium registry (2003-2019) included 16 tertiary referral centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. A total of 158 consecutive patients with CS and VT were included (33% female; mean [SD] age, 52 [11] years; 53% with ejection fraction [EF] <50%).

Exposures

Catheter ablation of CS-associated VT and, as appropriate, medical treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Immediate and short-term outcomes included procedural success, elimination of VT storm, and reduction in defibrillator shocks. The primary long-term outcome was the composite of VT recurrence, heart transplant (HT), or death.

Results

Complete procedural success (no inducible VT postablation) was achieved in 85 patients (54%). Sixty-five patients (41%) had preablation VT storm that did not recur postablation in 53 (82%). Defibrillator shocks were significantly reduced from a median (IQR) of 2 (1-5) to 0 (0-0) in the 30 days before and after ablation (P < .001). During median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.1-4.9) years, 73 patients (46%) experienced VT recurrence and 81 (51%) experienced the composite primary outcome. One- and 2-year rates of survival free of VT recurrence, HT, or death were 60% and 52%, respectively. EF less than 50% and myocardial inflammation on preprocedural 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were significantly associated with adverse prognosis in multivariable analysis for the primary outcome (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.37-3.64; P = .001 and HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.31-6.55; P = .009, respectively). History of hypertension was associated with a favorable long-term outcome (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this observational study of selected patients with CS and VT, catheter ablation was associated with reductions in defibrillator shocks and recurrent VT storm. Preablation LV dysfunction and myocardial inflammation were associated with adverse long-term prognosis. These data support the role of catheter ablation in conjunction with medical therapy in the management of CS-associated VT.

Long-Term Efficacy and Impact on Mortality of Remote Magnetic Navigation Guided Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) facilitates ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of RMN-guided ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC). A total of 176 consecutive patients (mean age 53.23 ± 17.55 years, 37% female) underwent VA ablation for PVC (132 patients, 75%) or VT (44 patients, 25%). The cohort consisted of 119 patients (68%) with idiopathic VA, 31 (18%) with ischemic (ICM), and 26 (15%) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). VA recurrence was observed in 69 patients (39%, mean age 51.71 ± 19.91 years, 23% female) during a follow-up period of 5.48 years (first quartile 770.50 days, second quartile 1101.50 days, third quartile 1615.50 days). Left ventricular ejection fraction <40% lead to a significantly increased risk for VA (p = 0.031*). Multivariate analyses found DCM to be an independent predictor (IP) for VA recurrence (p < 0.001*, hazard ratio (HR) 3.74, confidence interval (CI) 1.58-8.88). ICM resulted in a lower increase in VA recurrence (p = 0.221, HR 1.49, CI 0.79-2.81). Class I/III/IV antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AADs) was also identified as IP for recurrence (p = 0.030*, HR 2.48, CI 1.11-5.68). A total of 16 patients (9%) died within the observational period. RMN-guided ablation of VA lead to acceptable long-term results. An impaired LV function, DCM, and AADs were associated with a significant risk for VA recurrence. Personalized paths are needed to improve efficacy and outcome.

Sinus rhythm QRS amplitude and fractionation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy to identify ventricular tachycardia substrate and location

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate in left ventricular (LV) nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) consists of fibrosis with surviving myocardium.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether, in patients with LV NICM and sustained VT, reduced QRS amplitude and QRSf during sinus rhythm can identify the presence and location of abnormal septal (S-NICM) and/or free-wall (FW-NICM) VT substrate.

METHODS

We compared patients with NICM and VT (group 1) with electroanatomic mapping septal (S-NICM; n = 21) or free-wall (FW-NICM; n = 20) VT substrate to a 38-patient reference cohort (group 2) with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and NICM but no VT referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (26 [68.4%] with late gadolinium enhancement).

RESULTS

Group 1 had lower QRS amplitude in leads II (0.60 ± 0.22 vs 0.86 ± 0.35, P <.001), aVR (0.60 ± 0.24 vs 0.75 ± 0.31, P = .002), aVF (0.48 ± 0.20 vs 0.70 ± 0.28, P <.001), and V₂ (1.09 ± 0.52 vs 1.38 ± 0.55, P = .001) than group 2. QRS <0.55 mV in lead aVF identified VT and accompanying substrate with sensitivity 70% and specificity 71%. Most group 1 and group 2 patients had 12-lead ECG QRS fractionation (QRSf) in ≥2 contiguous leads (78% vs 63.2%, P = .14). Sensitivity and specificity for ≥2 QRSf leads identifying respective regional electroanatomic or cMRI abnormalities were 76% and 50% for inferior, 44% and 87% for lateral, and 21% and 89% for anterior leads.

CONCLUSION

In LV NICM, low frontal plane QRS (<0.55 mV in aVF) is associated with VT substrate. Although multilead QRS fractionation is associated with the presence and location of VT substrate, it is frequently identified in patients without VT with cMRI abnormalities.

[Ablation of cardiac arrhythmias using a three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system in the Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular - INCOR]

Objective

To describe the initial experience in ablation of cardiac arrhythmias using 3D mapping at the Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular INCOR (Lima, Peru).

Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was carried out. During February 2020, data was collected from the medical records of all patients in whom ablation was performed using 3D mapping from July 2017 to December 2019. This procedure was performed in patients with symptomatic arrhythmia refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy.

Results

Data were collected from 123 patients (median age: 46 years, 64.2% male), who had a median time of illness of 6 years. Among the arrhythmias treated, 19% had atrial fibrillation, 17.5% atrial tachycardia, 17.5% idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, 16.6% Wolf Parkinson White syndrome / Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, 11.1% ventricular arrhythmias of the His-Purkinje conduction system, 9.5% scar related ventricular tachycardia associated, 6.4% atrial flutter and 2.4% intranodal tachycardia. The median fluoroscopy time was 26 minutes. Ablation was acutely successful in 95.9% of cases, acute complications were observed in 4.8%, and recurrence-free survival during the first year of follow-up was 74%.

Conclusions

Our experience in ablation of cardiac arrhythmias using 3D mapping had a high acute success rate, low frequency of complications, and one-year recurrence-free survival of 74 %.

Multi-Modality Imaging for the Identification of Arrhythmogenic Substrates Prior to Electrophysiology Studies

Noninvasive cardiac imaging is crucial for the characterization of patients who are candidates for cardiac ablations, for both procedure planning and long-term management. Multimodality cardiac imaging can provide not only anatomical parameters but even more importantly functional information that may allow a better risk stratification of cardiac patients. Moreover, fusion of anatomical and functional data derived from noninvasive cardiac imaging with the results of endocavitary mapping may possibly allow a better identification of the ablation substrate and also avoid peri-procedural complications. As a result, imaging-guided electrophysiological procedures are associated with an improved outcome than traditional ablation procedures, with a consistently lower recurrence rate.

Impact of a high-density grid catheter on long-term outcomes for structural heart disease ventricular tachycardia ablation

Background

Substrate mapping has highlighted the importance of targeting diastolic conduction channels and late potentials during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. State-of-the-art multipolar mapping catheters have enhanced mapping capabilities. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether long-term outcomes were improved with the use of a HD Grid mapping catheter combining complementary mapping strategies in patients with structural heart disease VT.

Methods

Consecutive patients underwent VT ablation assigned to either HD Grid, Pentaray, Duodeca, or point-by-point (PbyP) RF mapping catheters. Clinical endpoints included recurrent anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), appropriate shock, asymptomatic non-sustained VT, or all-cause death.

Results

Seventy-three procedures were performed (33 HD Grid, 22 Pentaray, 12 Duodeca, and 6 PbyP) with no significant difference in baseline characteristics. Substrate mapping was performed in 97% of cases. Activation maps were generated in 82% of HD Grid cases (Pentaray 64%; Duodeca 92%; PbyP 33% (p = 0.025)) with similar trends in entrainment and pace mapping. Elimination of all VTs occurred in 79% of HD Grid cases (Pentaray 55%; Duodeca 83%; PbyP 33% (p = 0.04)). With a mean follow-up of 372 ± 234 days, freedom from recurrent ATP and shock was 97% and 100% respectively in the HD Grid group (Pentaray 64%, 82%; Duodeca 58%, 83%; PbyP 33%, 33% (log rank p = 0.0042, p = 0.0002)).

Conclusions

This study highlights a step-wise improvement in survival free from ICD therapies as the density of mapping capability increases. By using a high-density mapping catheter and combining complementary mapping strategies in a strict procedural workflow, long-term clinical outcomes are improved.

Microbubble-Facilitated Ultrasound Catheter Ablation Causes Microvascular Damage and Fibrosis

High-intensity ultrasound (US) ablation produces deeper myocardial lesions than radiofrequency ablation. The presence of intravascular microbubble (MB) contrast agents enhances pulsed-wave US ablation via cavitation-related histotripsy, potentially facilitating ablation in persistently perfused/conducting myocardium. US ablation catheters were developed and tested in the presence of MBs using ex vivo and in vivo models. High-frame-rate videomicroscopy and US imaging of gel phantom models confirmed MB destruction by inertial cavitation. MB-facilitated US ablation in an ex vivo perfused myocardium model generated shallow (2 mm) lesions and, in an in vivo murine hindlimb model, reduced perfusion by 42% with perivascular hemorrhage and inflammation, but no myonecrosis.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Prognostic significance of extensive versus limited induction protocol during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Testing for inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) pre- and postablation forms the cornerstone of contemporary scar-related VT ablation procedures. There is significant heterogeneity in reported VT induction protocols. We examined the utility of an extensive induction protocol (up to 4 extra-stimuli [ES] ± burst ventricular pacing) compared to the current guideline-recommended protocol (up to 3ES, defined as limited induction protocol) in patients with scar-related VT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (age: 64 ± 14 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 13%, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 31, nonischemic cardiomyopathy: 31) with at least one inducible VT were included. An extensive testing protocol induced 11%-17% more VTs, compared to the limited induction protocol before, and after the final ablation. VT recurred in 48% of patients during a mean follow up of 566 ± 428 days. Patients who were noninducible for any VT using the limited induction protocol had worse ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (12 months, 43% vs. 82%; p = .03) and worse survival free of VA, transplantation and mortality (12 months 46% vs. 82%; p = .02), compared to patients who were noninducible for any VT using the extensive induction protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 11% and 17% of inducible VTs may be missed if 4ES and burst pacing are not performed in induction protocols before and after ablation. Noninducibility for any VT after an extensive induction protocol after the final ablation portends more favorable prognostic outcomes when compared with the current guideline-recommended induction protocol of up to 3ES. This data suggests that the adoption of an extensive induction protocol is of prognostic benefit after VT ablation.

Epicardial Ablation in Nonischemic Ventricular Tachyardia

In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, epicardial ablation is critical in targeting epicardial paravalvular substrate. Epicardial access and ablation can be performed safely with attention to epicardial structures, such as the coronary arteries, phrenic nerve, and epicardial fat. This review explores the indications, techniques, complications, and outcomes of epicardial ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Although epicardial ablation adds to the complexity and risk of the ablation procedure, it is a vital tool that, combined with endocardial mapping and ablation, improves outcomes in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy suffering from ventricular arrhythmias.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Management of Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: Promise and Future Directions

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) caused by myocardial scaring bears a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) and catheter ablation remain the cornerstone of VT management, but both treatments have limited efficacy and potential adverse effects. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is routinely used in oncology to treat non-invasively solid tumors with high precision and efficacy. Recently, this technology has been evaluated for the treatment of VT. This review presents the basic underlying principles, proof of concept, and main results of trials and case series that used SBRT for the treatment of VT refractory to AAD and catheter ablation.

Long-Term Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Late Potential Abolition and VT Noninducibility

BACKGROUND

In patients with an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), the combination of late potential (LP) abolition and postprocedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) noninducibility is known to be the desirable end point for a successful long-term outcome after VT ablation. We investigated whether LP abolition and VT noninducibilty have a similar impact on the outcomes of patients with non-ICMs (NICM) undergoing VT ablation.

METHODS

A total of 403 patients with NICM (523 procedures) who underwent a VT ablation from 2010 to 2016 were included. The procedure end points were the LP abolition (if the LPs were absent, other ablation strategies were undertaken) and the VT noninducibilty.

RESULTS

The underlying structural heart disease consisted of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, 49%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD, 17%), postmyocarditis (14%), valvular heart disease (8%), congenital heart disease (2%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2%), and others (5%). The epicardial access was performed in 57% of the patients. At baseline, the LPs were present in 60% of the patients and a VT was either inducible or sustained/incessant in 85% of the cases. At the end of the procedure, the LP abolition was achieved in 79% of the cases and VT noninducibility in 80%. After a multivariable analysis, the combination of LP abolition and VT noninducibilty was independently associated with free survival from VT (hazard ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.29-0.69], P=0.0002) and cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.74], P=0.005). The benefit of the LP abolition on preventing the VT recurrence in patients with ARVD and postmyocarditis appeared superior to that observed for those with DCM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NICM undergoing VT ablation, the strategy of LP abolition and VT noninducibilty were associated with better outcomes in terms of long-term VT recurrences and cardiac survival. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Multimodality Imaging to Guide Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Non-ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The heterogeneous nature of NICM aetiologies and VT substrate in patients with NICM play a role in long-term ablation outcomes in this population. Over the past decades, more precise identification of NICM aetiologies and better characterisation of various substrates have been made. Application of multimodal imaging has greatly contributed to the accurate diagnosis of NICM subtypes and improved VT ablation strategies. This article summarises the current knowledge of multimodal imaging used in the characterisation of non-ischaemic NICM substrates, procedural planning and image integration for the optimisation of VT ablation.

Catheter and Device Management of Inherited Cardiac Conditions

This state-of-the art review discusses sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification and prevention using implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and the place of catheter ablation in the major inherited cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmic syndromes. ICD therapy protects against SCD in many inherited cardiac conditions, particularly the cardiomyopathies in advanced stages, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). However, they are not usually indicated in most patients with cardiac ion channelopathies, particularly long QT syndrome, since medical management is safe and preferable for most cases. The general exception is the secondary prevention setting following a cardiac arrest, where guidelines mostly support ICD therapy. However, in the case of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), ICD therapy is less clear, with some studies indicating increased mortality when an ICD is used following a cardiac arrest, compared to optimal medical therapy alone. When ICDs are placed, they are commonly associated with morbidity, and do not reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), such that multiple ICD shocks can ensue. Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce VA burden, VA related symptoms and ICD therapy in correctly identified patients in each condition. Its role is particularly important in cases where monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is prevalent, such as Lamin-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ARVC. Evidence is growing to support the use of catheter ablation to treat premature ventricular contraction (PVC) induced VF in the setting of long and short QT syndromes, CPVT, idiopathic VF and early repolarisation syndromes. In Brugada syndrome, epicardial substrate ablation can even apparently eliminate the electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype and reduce VA burden during follow-up.

Antiarrhythmic Drugs or Catheter Ablation in the Management of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), shocks are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA) in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in patients with an ICD.

METHODS

An electronic database search for randomized controlled trials that evaluated antiarrhythmic drugs and CA in patients with ICD was conducted. The primary outcome was recurrent VT. Secondary outcomes were ICD shocks and any deaths. Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses were performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs)/CIs.

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were identified (3828 total patients; age 64.3±11.4; 79% males). The use of amiodarone was associated with a significantly reduced rate of VT recurrence compared with control (HR=0.34 [95% CrI=0.15-0.74]; absolute risk difference=-0.23 [95% CrI=-0.23 to -0.09]; number needed to treat=4). Sotalol was associated with increased risk of VT recurrence compared with amiodarone (HR=2.88 [95% CrI=1.35-6.46]). Compared with control, amiodarone (HR=0.33 [95% CrI=0.15-0.76]; absolute risk difference=-0.17 [95% CrI=-0.32 to -0.06]; number needed to treat=6) and CA (HR=0.52 [95% CrI=0.30-0.89; absolute risk difference=-0.12 [95% CrI=-0.24 to -0.03]; number needed to treat=8) were associated with significantly reduced ICD shocks. Compared with amiodarone, sotalol was associated with significantly increased ICD shocks (HR=2.70 [95% CrI=1.17-6.71]). The rate of death was not significantly different between the competing strategies. The node-splitting method showed no inconsistency.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with an ICD, amiodarone significantly reduced VT recurrence and ICD shocks, while CA reduced ICD shocks. Sotalol significantly increased VT recurrence and ICD shocks compared with amiodarone. The long-term side effects of amiodarone and early complications of CA should be weighed carefully according to specific patient characteristics.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Noninvasive Programmed Ventricular Stimulation-Guided Management Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the impact of repeat catheter ablation (CA) prior to hospital discharge based on inducibility of clinical ventricular tachycardia (VT) during noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS).

BACKGROUND

Inducibility of clinical VT during NIPS performed several days after CA identifies patients at high risk of recurrence. The impact of NIPS-guided repeat CA has not been reported.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing CA of VT followed by NIPS were studied. Clinical VT was defined by comparison with 12-lead electrocardiograms and stored implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms from spontaneous VT episodes. Among those with inducible clinical VT at NIPS, VT-free survival was compared between those in whom ablation was repeated (group 1) versus those in whom ablation was not repeated (group 2) prior to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 469 patients (64 ± 12 years of age; 85% males; 60% ischemic), 216 patients (46%) underwent NIPS 3 days (interquartile range: 2 to 4 days) after CA. Clinical VT was induced in 45 patients (21%). Among those 45, CA was repeated in 11 patients (24%). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical or index CA characteristics between groups 1 and 2. Over a median 36-month follow-up, only 1 patient (9%) in group 1 experienced VT recurrence compared to 24 patients (71%) in group 2 (p < 0.01). In univariate Cox regression, repeat CA guided by NIPS (hazard ratio: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 0.58; p = 0.01) was the only predictor of VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with inducible clinical VT during post-ablation NIPS, repeat CA was associated with significantly lower risk of subsequent recurrence.

Long-term outcome and mode of recurrence following noninducibility during noninvasive programmed stimulation after ventricular tachycardia ablation

BACKGROUND

Noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) at noninvasive programmed stimulation performed shortly following ablation (negative NIPS) predicts low risk of the medium-term recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate long-term rate and mode of recurrence following negative NIPS.

METHODS

We extended follow-up on patients in whom no VT could be induced at NIPS following ablation between 2008 and 2010. Recurrent VTs were categorized as "Original clinical" if they matched VT that had occurred spontaneously prior to the index ablation; "Original nonclinical" if they matched VT that was induced during the index ablation but had not occurred spontaneously; or "New." Among those undergoing repeat ablation, the area ablated to treat the recurrent VT was categorized as "Targeted initial scar" if it was targeted during the index procedure; "Untargeted initial scar" if it was present but not targeted during the index procedure; or "New scar" if it was not present during the index procedure.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients with negative NIPS, 18 (30%) had recurrent VT and nine underwent repeat ablation over (4.1 ± 3.2) years follow-up. Of 23 recurrent VTs, 18 (78%) were "New." During repeat ablations, six (46%) of the 13 recurrent VTs were ablated in "untargeted initial scar" and four (31%) in "new scar."

CONCLUSIONS

When spontaneous or inducible VTs are eliminated with ablation and no longer inducible during NIPS, these VTs are unlikely to recur during long-term follow-up. More commonly, new VTs occur, which are either associated with areas of scar not present or not targeted during the initial ablation.

Ablation of recurrent malignant idiopathic ventricular tachycardia: When proper diagnosis and success is a matter of contact

Effective and stable contact between the catheter tip and the tissue is crucial for both mapping and lesion formation during cardiac ablation procedures. Contact force catheter may be not only a therapeutic approach to arrhythmias, but also a tool for achieving accurate characterization of the arrhythmic substrate.

Prognostic value role of radiofrequency lesion size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on outcomes of ablation in patients with ischemic scar-related ventricular tachycardia: A single center pilot study

Inadequate ablation lesion formation may be responsible for post-ablation ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences.We aimed to evaluate whether visualisation of radiofrequency (RF) lesion size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has any role in predicting adequacy of lesion and in estimating outcome.Retrospective pilot studyNine consecutive patients (8 male, age 60 ± 13 years) underwent ablation for sustained VT because of ischemic scar were evaluated for pre- and post-procedure scar tissue by CMR to characterize ablation lesions. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) surrounded by late gadolinium enhancement was defined as irreversible RF lesion. All patients were followed for at least 6 months for recurrences.Five of the patients had previous inferior myocardial infarction (MI), whereas remaining 4 had anterior MI. Acute procedural success, as defined by termination of the arrhythmia without recurrence in 30 minutes, was attained in all patients. Contrast enhancement and wall motion abnormality in presumed infarction area were confirmed by pre-ablation CMR images. MVO was detected at the reported ablation site in 6/9 patients, all arrhythmia- and symptom-free at median 24 months (range 8-38 months) follow-up. In remaining 3 patients who had VT recurrence (clinical VT in 2, sustain VT with a new morphology in 1), MVO was not detected despite achievement of acute procedural success. There was no correlation with pre-ablation scar size and clinical arrhythmia recurrence.CMR is a useful imaging modality to guide ablation procedures by detecting scar tissue. Additionally MVO seen by post-procedural imaging may be related to adequacy of RF ablation lesions and may correlate with clinical outcome.

Electrophysiologic Considerations After Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Background:

Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) remains a major public health concern, accounting for more than 50% of cardiac deaths. The majority of these deaths are related to ischemic heart disease, however increasingly recognized are non-ischemic causes such as cardiac channelopathies. Bradyarrhythmias and pulseless electrical activity comprise a larger proportion of out-of-hospital arrests than previously realized, particularly in patients with more advanced heart failure or noncardiac triggers such as pulmonary embolism. Patients surviving Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) have a substantial risk of recurrence, particularly within 18 months post event. The timing of tachyarrhythmias complicating acute infarction has important implications regarding the likelihood of recurrence, with those occurring within 48 hours having a more favorable long-term outcome. In the absence of a clear reversible cause, implantable cardioverter defibrillators remain the mainstay in the secondary prevention of SCD. Post defibrillation electromechanical dissociation is common in patients with cardiomyopathy and can lead to SCD despite successful defibrillation of the primary tachyarrhythmia. Antiarrhythmic agents are highly effective in preventing recurrent arrhythmias in specific diseases such as the congenital long QT syndrome.

Conclusion:

Catheter ablation is used most commonly to prevent recurrent ICD therapies in patients with structural heart disease-related ventricular arrhythmias, however recent publications have shown substantial benefit in other entities such as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation is being increasingly performed as adjunctive treatment to prevent recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). In the context of VT ablation, nonischemic cardiomyopathy usually refers to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) as one morphological phenotype. Over the past decades, progress has been made to better characterize distinct subtypes and to differentiate between causes of DCM, which has important practical and prognostic implications. The goal of this review is to summarize available data on VT ablation in patients with DCM and, more specifically, review procedural and outcome data in specific etiologies and substrate location. It will focus on our current understanding of nonischemic scars, as well as the value of multimodal imaging, image integration, and electroanatomic mapping for substrate identification, procedural planning, and ablation. In addition, recent findings from whole human heart histology of patients with DCM and VT and their potential implications for imaging and mapping will be discussed.

Feasibility of Performing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation and Endomyocardial Biopsy in the Same Setting

In patients with unexplained cardiomyopathy, electroanatomical mapping can identify abnormal tissue to target during electrophysiology-guided endomyocardial biopsy (EP-guided EMB). The objective of this study is to determine whether catheter ablation performed in the same setting as EP-guided EMB increases procedural risk. Sixty-seven patients (mean age 54.4 ± 13.8, 57% male) undergoing EP-guided EMB were included. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 17 patients (25%) for ventricular arrhythmias and in 2 (3%) for typical atrial flutter. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 90% ablation patients and 40% biopsy-only patients; vascular access complications were more common in the ablation group than in the EMB-only group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in rate of tricuspid regurgitation, thromboembolism, or pericardial effusion, whether procedural anticoagulation was used. In conclusion, catheter ablation and procedural anticoagulation can be combined with EP-guided EMB with an increased risk of vascular access complications, but no significant increase in intracardiac complications.

Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Substrate Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease

As we have witnessed in other arenas of catheter-based therapeutics, ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has become increasingly anatomical in its execution. Multi-modality imaging provides anatomical detail in substrate characterization, which is often complex in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Patients with intramural, intraseptal, and epicardial substrates provide challenges in delivering effective ablation to the critical arrhythmia substrate due to the depth of origin or the presence of adjacent critical structures. Novel ablation techniques such as simultaneous unipolar or bipolar ablation can be useful to achieve greater lesion depth, though at the expense of increasing collateral damage. Disruptive technologies like stereotactic radioablation may provide a tailored approach to these complex patients while minimizing procedural risk. Substrate ablation is a cornerstone of the contemporary VT ablation procedure, and recent data suggest that it is as effective and more efficient that conventional activation guided ablation. A number of specific targets and techniques for substrate ablation have been described, and all have shown a fairly high success in achieving their acute procedural endpoint. Substrate ablation also provides a novel and reproducible procedural endpoint, which may add predictive value for VT recurrence beyond conventional programmed stimulation. Extrapolation of outcome data to nonischemic phenotypes requires caution given both the variability in substrate nonischemic distribution and the underrepresentation of these patients in previous trials.