Endo-/Epicardial Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Identification of Atrial Transmural Conduction Inhomogeneity Using Unipolar Electrogram Morphology

(1) Background: Structural remodeling plays an important role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is likely that structural remodeling occurs transmurally, giving rise to electrical endo-epicardial asynchrony (EEA). Recent studies have suggested that areas of EEA may be suitable targets for ablation therapy of AF. We hypothesized that the degree of EEA is more pronounced in areas of transmural conduction block (T-CB) than single-sided CB (SS-CB). This study examined the degree to which SS-CB and T-CB enhance EEA and which specific unipolar potential morphology parameters are predictive for SS-CB or T-CB. (2) Methods: Simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping in the human right atrium was performed in 86 patients. Potential morphology parameters included unipolar potential voltages, low-voltage areas, potential complexity (long double and fractionated potentials: LDPs and FPs), and the duration of fractionation. (3) Results: EEA was mostly affected by the presence of T-CB areas. Lower potential voltages and more LDPs and FPs were observed in T-CB areas compared to SS-CB areas. (4) Conclusion: Areas of T-CB could be most accurately predicted by combining epicardial unipolar potential morphology parameters, including voltages, fractionation, and fractionation duration (AUC = 0.91). If transmural areas of CB indeed play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of AF, they could theoretically be used as target sites for ablation.

Electrophysiological mapping of the epicardium via 3D-printed flexible arrays

Cardiac electrophysiology mapping and ablation are widely used to treat heart rhythm disorders such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Here, we describe an approach for rapid production of three dimensional (3D)-printed mapping devices derived from magnetic resonance imaging. The mapping devices are equipped with flexible electronic arrays that are shaped to match the epicardial contours of the atria and ventricle and allow for epicardial electrical mapping procedures. We validate that these flexible arrays provide high-resolution mapping of epicardial signals in vivo using porcine models of AF and myocardial infarction. Specifically, global coverage of the epicardial surface allows for mapping and ablation of myocardial substrate and the capture of premature ventricular complexes with precise spatial-temporal resolution. We further show, as proof-of-concept, the localization of sites of VT by means of beat-to-beat whole-chamber ventricular mapping of ex vivo Langendorff-perfused human hearts.

Combination of percutaneous left appendage epicardial ligation and endo-epicardial atrial fibrillation ablation

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the main cause of cardioembolic stroke. In high-bleeding-risk patients, long-life anticoagulation therapy is not permitted, and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure may be considered. LAA is also a critical substrate for AF. Epicardial LAA occlusion has several advantages: LAA ligation results in a favorable electrical and structural atrial remodeling, which decreases AF recurrence. Endocardial ablation alone is not efficient for all patients, and new evidence shows better outcomes in patients affected by persistent AF after a combined hybrid endo-epicardial ablation. Considering the synergic potential of these techniques, in this case series, they were both combined in a single procedure.

Methods and results

We describe the treatment of 5 patients referred for refractory AF ablation and LAA closure. All patients had high thrombotic and previous major hemorrhage, with relative contraindication to life-long therapy with anticoagulation. A combined procedure of LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was scheduled with short-term anticoagulation. LAA closure was performed with an epicardial approach using the LARIAT system. Then, LA mapping and ablation were performed, endocardially and then epicardially.All procedures were concluded without complications.At follow-up, in all patients, transesophageal echocardiography showed the complete occlusion of the LAA; therefore, anticoagulation therapy was interrupted. All patients were asymptomatic, and in the sinus rhythm, no hemorrhage or ischemic events occurred.

Conclusion

The combination of percutaneous LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was revealed to be feasible and safe and might represent a new approach for the treatment of refractory AF in patients with indication of LAA occlusion.

Pulsed-field ablation for the treatment of left atrial reentry tachycardia

BACKGROUND

We describe our initial experience using a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of left atrial (LA) reentry tachycardia.

METHODS

We included all patients with LA reentry tachycardia treated with PFA at our institution between September 2021 and March 2022. The tachycardia mechanism was identified using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM). Subsequently, a roof line, anterior line, or mitral isthmus line was ablated as appropriate. Roof line ablation was always combined with LA posterior wall (LAPW) ablation. Positioning of the PFA catheter was guided by a 3D-EAM system and by fluoroscopy. Bidirectional block across lines was verified using standard criteria. Additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used to achieve bidirectional block as necessary.

RESULTS

Among 22 patients (median age 70 (59-75) years; 9 females), we identified 27 LA reentry tachycardia: seven roof dependent macro-reentries, one posterior-wall micro-reentry, twelve peri-mitral macro-reentries, and seven anterior-wall micro-reentries. We ablated a total of 20 roof lines, 13 anterior lines, and 6 mitral isthmus lines. Additional RFA was necessary for two anterior lines (15%) and three mitral isthmus lines (50%). Bidirectional block was achieved across all roof lines, 92% of anterior lines, and 83% of mitral isthmus lines. We observed no acute procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

Ablation of a roof line and of the LAPW is feasible, effective, and safe using this multipolar PFA catheter. However, the catheter is less suited for ablation of the mitral isthmus and the anterior line. A focal pulsed-field ablation catheter may be more effective for ablation of these lines. This study shows the feasibility to ablate linear lesions with a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter. 27 left atrial reentry tachycardia were treated in 22 patients.

Epicardial connections and bi-atrial tachycardias: From anatomy to clinical practice

Bi-atrial tachycardia (BiAT) is not rare after extensive atrial ablation or cardiac surgery. The complexity of bi-atrial reentrant circuits poses a great challenge for clinical practice. With recent advances in mapping technologies, we are now able to characterize atrial activation in detail. However, given the involvement of both atria and multiple epicardial conductions, endocardial mapping for BiATs is not easy to understand. Knowledge of the atrial myocardial architecture is the foundation for the clinical management of BiATs; as it is required to understand the possible mechanism of the tachycardia and identify the optimal target of ablation. In this review we summarize current knowledge about the anatomy of interatrial connections as well as other epicardial fibers and discuss the interpretation of electrophysiological findings and ablation strategies for BiATs.

Stepwise mapping and ablation algorithm in patients undergoing ablation of unstable, unmappable scar-based atrial tachycardias

BACKGROUND

Scar based atrial tachycardia (AT)'s usually presents with a complex electrophysiological substrate. It is not uncommon that multiple instable ATs are present in a single patient. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients who had undergone ablation for instable ATs, and report outcomes of the stepwise substrate ablation procedure during the follow-up.

METHODS

Patients scheduled to undergo AT ablation were screened for enrollment to the study. When instable ATs were diagnosed a stepwise mapping and ablation algorithm was applied to all patients. After the procedure, patients were clinically and electrocardiographically followed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The mean number of ATs observed during the procedures is 3.1±0.7. At the end of the procedure, 18 (69.2%) patients had isolated posterior wall. Anterior mitral line ablation was successfully performed in 13 (50%), mitral isthmus line in 4 (15.4%), roof line in 4 (15.4%) patients. The mean follow-up was 13.5±5.4 months. During the follow-up period 6(23.1%) patients developed arrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

A reasonable mid-term success can be expected in patients with instable ATs undergoing ablation according to the stepwise substrate modification algorithm, however due to extensive ablation it should be reserved for patients where conventional activation mapping cannot be performed.

Low-Voltage Myocardium-Guided Ablation Trial of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Clinically effective ablation approaches for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still being debated. So far, ablation targets and strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have failed to show systematic outcome improvement in randomized controlled clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether PVI plus individualized substrate ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium improves outcome in patients with persistent AF. We randomly assigned 324 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive PVI alone (163 patients; PVI only) or PVI plus substrate modification (161 patients; PVI+SM). The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia longer than 30 seconds after single ablation, with 3 months blanking, using serial 7-day electrocardiogram recordings over 12 months of observation. Patients were also encouraged to receive implantable cardiac monitors. RESULTS: The primary study end point occurred in 75 PVI-only patients (50%) and in 54 PVI+SM patients (35%) (Kaplan–Meier event rate estimates: hazard ratio=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.43 to 0.88, log rank P=0.006). Adverse events occurred in three PVI-only patients (1.8%) and in six PVI+SM patients (3.7%) (difference: −1.9 percentage points, 95% CI=−5.5 to 1.7 percentage points). Implant monitoring was used in 242 patients. Among them, 65 PVI-only patients (55%) versus 47 PVI+SM patients (39%) experienced recurrences (difference: 15 percentage points, 95% CI=3 to 28 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, PVI plus individualized ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium significantly improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02732626.)

Detection of endo-epicardial atrial low-voltage areas using unipolar and omnipolar voltage mapping

Background: Low-voltage areas (LVA) can be located exclusively at either the endocardium or epicardium. This has only been demonstrated for bipolar voltages, but the value of unipolar and omnipolar voltages recorded from either the endocardium and epicardium in predicting LVAs at the opposite layer remains unknown. The goal of this study was therefore to compare simultaneously recorded endo-epicardial unipolar and omnipolar potentials and to determine whether their voltage characteristics are predictive for opposite LVAs.

Methods: Intra-operative simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping (256 electrodes, interelectrode distances 2 mm) was performed during sinus rhythm at the right atrium in 93 patients (67 ± 9 years, 73 male). Cliques of four electrodes (2 × 2 mm) were used to define maximal omnipolar (Vomni,max) and unipolar (Vuni,max) voltages. LVAs were defined as Vomni,max ≤0.5 mV or Vuni,max ≤1.0 mV.

Results: The majority of both unipolar and omnipolar LVAs were located at only the endocardium (74.2% and 82.0% respectively) or epicardium (52.7% and 47.6% respectively). Of the endocardial unipolar LVAs, 25.8% were also located at the opposite layer and 47.3% vice-versa. In omnipolar LVAs, 18.0% of the endocardial LVAs were also located at the epicardium and 52.4% vice-versa. The combination of epicardial Vuni,max and Vomni,max was most accurate in identifying dual-layer LVAs (50.4%).

Conclusion: Unipolar and omnipolar LVAs are frequently located exclusively at either the endocardium or epicardium. Endo-epicardial LVAs are most accurately identified using combined epicardial unipolar and omnipolar voltages. Therefore, a combined endo-epicardial unipolar and omnipolar mapping approach is favoured as it may be more indicative of possible arrhythmogenic substrates.

Current Understanding of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: From Pulmonary Vein to Epicardium

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is common, with pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection considered the most likely cause. However, technologies such as contact force-sensing, irrigated catheters, and ablation index (AI)-guided ablation strategies have resulted in more durable PV isolation. As a result, it is difficult to predict which patients will develop AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation, with evolving non-PV atrial substrates thought to be a key contributor to late recurrences. Deciphering the complex mechanisms of AF recurrence beyond the cornerstone of PV isolation therefore remains challenging. Recently, there have been several important advances that may lead to better understanding and treatment of this challenging clinical entity: percutaneous epicardial access and mapping, late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI), improvements in high-resolution electroanatomic mapping, and new ablation energy sources, specifically pulsed-field ablation. This review aims to synthesize the current literature in an effort to better understand arrhythmia mechanisms and treatment targets in patients with AF/Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence post-ablation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Combined epicardial and endocardial approach for redo radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial

AIMS

An epicardial approach is an effective means to detect and eliminate residual potentials in non-transmural lesions created during prior endocardial ablation. We sought to determine the impact of a combined epicardial and endocardial approach compared with a conventional endocardial approach, on recurrence-free survival after redo ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Participants with recurred persistent atrial fibrillation after prior endocardial ablation were randomized (1:1) to undergo treatment with the combined approach (epicardial followed by endocardial ablation) for the treatment group or conventional approach (endocardial ablation only) for the control group. The primary outcome was the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia following a 90-day blanking period within 12 months after the procedure. The secondary safety outcome was the occurrence of procedure-related complications within 24 h after the procedure. Of 100 randomized participants {median age, 59.0 [(interquartile range (IQR): 53.8-64.3] years, including 16% women, with one prior ablation (IQR: 1-1)}, 93 (93%) completed the trial. Events relevant to the primary outcome occurred in 16 patients in the treatment group and in 21 patients in the control group {Kaplan-Meier estimator percentages, 32 vs. 42%; hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-1.37]}. The periprocedural complication rate was lower in the treatment group [2 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.11 (95% CI: 0.00-0.87)] with similar achievement of the procedural endpoint in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the redo procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation, the combined approach had no significant difference of recurrence-free survival and a lower procedural complication rate compared with the conventional approach.

Feasibility of "natural surface" epicardial mapping from the pulmonary artery for management of atrial arrhythmias

Background

The right and left pulmonary artery branches (RPA, LPA) overlie inaccessible left atrial (LA) epicardium, containing the Bachmann bundle (BB), that participate in arrhythmia pathogenesis and offer an opportunity for natural surface epicardial mapping (NSEM).

Objective

We sought to assess the feasibility of NSEM of BB and LA roof arrhythmias.

Methods

Electrogram recording, pacing, and ablation was performed in 2 swine. Subsequently, NSEM and pacing from the RPA and LPA was performed in 11 consecutive patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Pacing entrainment and ablation of LA epicardium, from the pulmonary artery (PA), was performed in cases of atypical flutter.

Results

Swine specimens revealed no vascular disruption and LA epicardial lesions up to 7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in depth. In clinical cases, RPA mapping was performed in 11 (100%) and LPA mapping in 6 (55%) patients. Simultaneous leftward activation of the BB followed by rightward activation of the opposing LA endocardium was recorded during crista pacing. Right and left PA median signal amplitudes were 0.71 mV and 0.30 mV, respectively. Endocardial LA median distance was 9 mm to the RPA and 15.6 mm to the LPA and LA capture was successful in 7 of 8 (88%). In cases of atypical flutter, entrainment was successful in 3 of 3 (100%) and ablation was performed.

Conclusion

PA NSEM can enable safe recording and entrainment of the BB, providing otherwise inaccessible epicaridal arrhythmia measurements. The safety and efficacy of ablation from the PA requires further study.

The surgical technique of the convergent procedure

The convergent procedure is a newly developed hybrid ablation procedure that involves extensive epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall followed by endocardial mapping and addition of pulmonary vein isolation. It is a team-based approach that provides a promising option for patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation. In this manuscript, we present a detailed description of the surgical component of this procedure and include potential pitfalls based on our experience in performing it.

Left Atrial Isolation and Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at End-Stage Left Atrial Fibrotic Disease

[Figure: see text].

Stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The Mediterranea approach

Background

Outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) among patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are largely disappointing.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of a single‐stage stepwise endo‐/epicardial approach in patients with persistent/longstanding‐persistent AF.

Methods

We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent (n = 4) or longstanding‐persistent (n = 21) AF and at least one prior endocardial procedure, who underwent CA using an endo‐/epicardial approach. Our anatomical stepwise protocol included multiple endocardial as well as epicardial (Bachmann's bundle [BB] and ligament of Marshall ablations) components, and entailed ablation of atrial tachycardias emerging during the procedure. The primary outcome was freedom from any AF/atrial tachycardia episode after a 3‐month blanking period. The secondary outcome was patients' symptom status during follow‐up.

Results

The stepwise endo‐/epicardial approach allowed sinus rhythm restoration in 72% of patients, either directly (n = 6, 24%) or after AF organization into atrial tachycardia (n = 12, 48%). BB's ablation was commonly implicated in arrhythmia termination. After a median follow‐up of 266 days (interquartile range, 96 days), survival free from AF/atrial tachycardia was 88%. Antiarrhythmic drugs could be discontinued in 22 patients (88%). As compared to baseline, more patients were asymptomatic at 9‐month follow‐up (0% vs. 56%, p = .02). Five patients (20%) developed mild medical complications, whereas one subject (4%) had severe kidney injury requiring dialysis.

Conclusion

A single‐stage endo‐/epicardial CA resulted in favorable rhythm and symptom outcomes in a cohort of patients with symptomatic persistent/longstanding‐persistent AF and one or more prior endocardial procedures. Epicardial ablation of BB was commonly implicated in procedural success.

Ligament of Marshall ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

Beyond pulmonary vein isolation, the two main additional strategies: Cox-Maze procedure or targeting of electrical signatures (focal bursts, rotational activities, meandering wavelets), remain controversial. High-density mapping of these arrhythmias has demonstrated firstly that a patchy lesion set is highly proarrhythmogenic, favoring macro-re-entry through conduction slowing and providing pivots for localized re-entry. Secondly, discrete anatomical structures such as the Vein or Ligament of Marshall (VOM/LOM) and the coronary sinus (CS) have epicardial muscular bundles that are more frequently involved in re-entry than previously thought. The Marshall Bundle can be ablated at any point along its course from the mid-to-distal coronary sinus to the left atrial appendage. If necessary, the VOM may be directly ablated using ethanol infusion to eliminate PV contributions and produce conduction block across the mistral isthmus. Ethanol ablation of the VOM, supplemented with RF ablation, may be more effective in producing conduction block at the mitral isthmus than repeat RF ablation alone.

Left atrial phasic transport function closely correlates with fibrotic and arrhythmogenic atrial tissue degeneration in atrial fibrillation patients: cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and voltage mapping

AIMS

To characterize the association of phasic left atrial (LA) transport function and LA fibrosis guided by multimodality imaging containing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking and bipolar voltage mapping.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients presenting for first-time ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent CMR prior to the ablation procedure. LA phasic indexed volumes (LA-Vi) and emptying fractions (LA-EF) were calculated and CMR feature tracking guided LA wall motion analysis was performed. LA bipolar voltage mapping was carried out in sinus rhythm to find areas of low voltage as a surrogate for fibrosis and arrhythmogenesis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Low-voltage areas (LVAs) were present in 70 patients (42%). Contrary to LA volume, CMR based LA-EF [odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.96, P = 0.005] and LA booster pump strain rate (SR) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P = 0.001) significantly predicted presence and extent of LVA in multivariate logistic regression analysis for patients scanned in SR. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, LA-EF <40% carried a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 76% (area under the curve 0.8; 95% CI 0.71-0.89) to predict presence of LVA. For patients scanned in AF only minimal LA-Vi on CMR (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; P = 0.002) predicted presence of LVA.

CONCLUSION

For patients scanned in SR LA-EF and LA booster pump SR are closely linked to the presence and extent of LA LVA.

The effect of posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation on recurrent arrhythmia

INTRODUCTION

It is important to consider recurrent arrhythmia after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) for planning an ablation strategy. However, the studies are limited to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus posterior wall isolation (PWI), which were reported to improve procedural outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of PWI on recurrent arrhythmia.

METHODS

This is an observational study on patients with persistent AF comparing PVI plus PWI and PVI only strategies. In PVI plus PWI group, linear ablation of the left atrium roofline and bottom line were performed to achieve PWI after PVI. Some patients with AF recurrence underwent the second procedure. The presence of recurrent arrhythmia and results of the second procedures were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients (mean age, 66.9 ± 10.2 years; male, 76.8%) were included. PVI plus PWI group and PVI only group consisted of 90 and 91 patients, respectively. AF recurrence was observed in 28 of 90 (31.1%) patients with PVI plus PWI and in 43 of 91 (47.3%) with PVI only, and log-rank test did not show any significant difference (p = .35). The occurrence of recurrent persistent AF was significantly lower in PVI plus PWI group than in PVI only group (5/90; 5.6% vs. 18/91; 20.9%, p = .002). There was no significant difference between the two groups in recurrent paroxysmal AF and atrial tachycardia (AT).

CONCLUSION

PWI, in addition to PVI, for persistent AF was significantly related to fewer episodes of recurrent persistent AF, and it did not increase recurrent AT.

Marshall bundle elimination, Pulmonary vein isolation, and Line completion for ANatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Prospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND

Beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains poorly defined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine a novel comprehensive ablation strategy (Marshall bundle elimination, Pulmonary vein isolation, and Line completion for ANatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation [Marshall-PLAN]) strictly based on anatomical considerations.

METHODS

Left atrial (LA) sites were sequentially targeted as follows: (1) coronary sinus and vein of Marshall (CS-VOM) musculature; (2) PVI; and (3) anatomical isthmuses (mitral, roof, and cavotricuspid isthmus [CTI]). The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT).

RESULTS

Seventy-five consecutive patients were included (age 61 ± 9 years; 10 women; AF duration 9 ± 11 months; mean LA volume 197 ± 43 mL). VOM ethanol infusion was completed in 69 patients (92%). The full Marshall-PLAN lesion set (VOM, PVI, mitral, roof, and CTI with block) was successfully completed in 68 patients (91%). At 12 months, 54 of 75 patients (72%) were free from AF/AT after a single procedure (no antiarrhythmic drugs) in the overall cohort. In the subset of patients with a complete Marshall-PLAN lesion set (n = 68), the single procedure success rate was 79%. After 1 or 2 procedures, 67 of 75 patients (89%) remained free from AF/AT (no antiarrhythmic drugs). After 1 or 2 procedures, VOM ethanol infusion was complete in 72 of 75 patients (96%).

CONCLUSION

A novel ablation strategy that systematically targets anatomical atrial structures (VOM ethanol infusion, PVI, and prespecified linear lesions) is feasible, safe, and associated with a high rate of freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months in patients with persistent AF.

Epicardial course of the septopulmonary bundle: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for roof line completion

BACKGROUND

Gaps in the roof line have been ascribed to epicardial conduction using the septopulmonary bundle.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the frequency of septopulmonary bundle bypass during roof line ablation, to describe anatomical conditions favoring this epicardial gap, and to propose an alternative strategy when present.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. A de novo roof line was created between the superior pulmonary veins. In cases of residual gaps, a floor line was created between the inferior pulmonary veins. Microtomography imaging and histological analyses of 5 human donor hearts were performed: a specific focus was made on the dome and the posterior wall.

RESULTS

Residual gaps were more frequent in roof lines than floor lines (33% vs 15%; P = .049). Electrogram morphologies, activation sequences, and pacing maneuvers indicated an epicardial bypass of the roof line in all cases. Conduction block was obtained in 67 roof lines and 28 floor lines, resulting in a 95% success rate of linear block, without "box" isolation. Between the superior pulmonary veins, the atrial myocardium was thicker and consistently displayed adipose tissue separating the septopulmonary bundle from the septoatrial bundle.

CONCLUSION

Epicardial conduction across the roof line is common and requires careful electrogram analysis to detect. In such cases, a floor line can be an effective alternative strategy, with clear validation criteria. Myocardial thickness and fat interposition may explain difficulties in achieving lesion transmurality during roof line ablation.

The ligament of Marshall and arrhythmias: A review

The ligament of Marshall (LOM) is a remnant of the embryonic sinus venosus and left cardinal vein, and contains fat and fibrous tissues, blood vessels, muscle bundles, nerve fibers, and ganglia. The complexity of LOM's structure makes it as a source of triggers and drivers as well as substrates of re-entry for atrial arrhythmias, especially for atrial fibrillation (AF). LOM also serves as a portion of left atrial macro-re-entrant circuit, especially peri-mitral isthmus re-entrant circuit. Experimental studies demonstrate that the LOM acts as a sympathetic conduit between the left stellate ganglion and the ventricles, and participates in the initiation and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. Endocardial or epicardial catheter ablation or ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall may serve as an important adjunct therapy to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with advanced stage of AF, and may help alleviate ventricular arrhythmias as well.

Percutaneous Epicardial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

The observations afforded by epicardial mapping have not only increased the appreciation of distinct epicardial structures in the left atrium but also underscore the need to address the substrate transmurally. Although epicardial access and ablation have attendant risks, comparative studies with hybrid surgical approaches are lacking. In the search to find unifying mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, a conceptual shift that emphasizes the substrate in 3 dimensions, with the epicardium distinct from the endocardium, holds promise for future investigation and evolving therapeutic tools.

Patient Selection for Epicardial Ablation-Part II: The Epicardial Approach and Current Challenges Associated with Epicardial Ablation

Since their inception, percutaneous epicardial approaches have become increasingly common in clinical practice with the advent of new technology and the growth of catheter ablation for both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. In addition to identifying the arrhythmogenic foci, there remain challenges to successful epicardial ablation such as the choice of energy source, optimizing irrigation during ablation, and anatomic barriers such as epicardial fat and coronary vessels. The performance of continued translational studies to understand how each of these factors contribute to lesion formation will be essential to guide future advances in the field of epicardial ablation.

Patient Selection for Epicardial Ablation-Part I: The Role of Epicardial Ablation in Various Cardiac Disease States

Epicardial catheter ablation is most commonly performed following unsuccessful endocardial ablation. Given the frequency of epicardial substrates in certain cardiomyopathic disease states, however, a combined endocardial–epicardial approach should be considered as a primary treatment strategy. Although epicardial ablation is primarily deployed in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, the role of epicardial approaches in supraventricular tachycardias (eg, atrial fibrillation, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and—rarely—accessory pathways) is growing, with continued advances being made.

Electrophysiological findings during atrial fibrillation reablation: Extending from pulmonary vein reconnection to sequential bipolar voltage map information

BACKGROUND

Left atrial substrate modification targeting low voltage zones (LVZ) is an ablation strategy that-in addition to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation-tries to eliminate arrhythmogenic mechanisms harbored in such tissue. Electrophysiological findings at reablation include (a) PV reconnection, (b) reconnection over previous substrate ablation, and (c) de-novo LVZ.

OBJECTIVE

To study, prevalence and contribution of these arrhythmogenic electrophysiological entities in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with highly symptomatic AF undergoing index and reablation were included (n = 113). In all patients' PV reconnection, reconnection over previous substrate ablation and spontaneous de-novo LVZ were quantitatively assessed and integrated into an individual reablation strategy. Follow-up was based on continuous device monitoring.

RESULTS

At re-do procedure, 45 out of 113 (39.8%) patients showed PV reconnection as the only electrophysiological abnormality. Reconduction over previous lines was the only electrophysiological abnormality in 8 out of 113 (7.1%) patients. Spontaneous de-novo LVZ was the only electrophysiological abnormality in 12 out of 113 (10.6%) patients. Combined findings of PV reconnection, line reconduction, and/or spontaneous de-novo LVZ were seen in 40 out of 113 (35.4%) patients. No detectable electrophysiological abnormality was observed in 8 out of 113 (7.1%) patients. In univariate analysis, none of the tested electrophysiological characteristics independently predicted the outcome after re-do.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing reablation, we could show that reconduction over previous substrate ablation as well as the development of new low voltage areas are frequent findings besides classical PV reconnection-without a clear leading cause for recurrences. These findings impact reablation strategies as well as the strategic focus during index procedures.

Challenges Associated with Interpreting Mechanisms of AF

Determining optimal treatment strategies for complex arrhythmogenesis in AF is confounded by the lack of consensus regarding the mechanisms causing AF. Studies report different mechanisms for AF, ranging from hierarchical drivers to anarchical multiple activation wavelets. Differences in the assessment of AF mechanisms are likely due to AF being recorded across diverse models using different investigational tools, spatial scales and clinical populations. The authors review different AF mechanisms, including anatomical and functional re-entry, hierarchical drivers and anarchical multiple wavelets. They then describe different cardiac mapping techniques and analysis tools, including activation mapping, phase mapping and fibrosis identification. They explain and review different data challenges, including differences between recording devices in spatial and temporal resolutions, spatial coverage and recording surface, and report clinical outcomes using different data modalities. They suggest future research directions for investigating the mechanisms underlying human AF.

Percutaneous Epicardial Approach to Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Since their introduction >2 decades ago, percutaneous catheter-based epicardial mapping and ablation have become widely adopted by cardiac electrophysiologists around the world. Although epicardial mapping has been used for catheter ablation of a wide variety of cardiac arrhythmias, its most common use is for ablation of intramural and subepicardial substrates that give rise to ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. As such, the subxiphoid percutaneous epicardial approach has emerged as an important adjunct, and, in some cases, is the preferred strategy in this regard. This review discusses the rationale and indications for epicardial catheter mapping and/or ablation. This paper also reviews the prevalence of epicardial arrhythmias and their electrocardiographic criteria. In addition, it examines the anatomy of the pericardium and commonly used epicardial access techniques, as well as the optimal methodologies for epicardial mapping and ablation and the impact of epicardial fat. Finally, this review discusses the potential of the various complications associated with the percutaneous epicardial approach, in addition to patient-specific risk factors, and potential strategies to mitigate the risk of complications.

Mechanism of Recurrence of Atrial Tachycardia

Background:

Atrial fibrillation ablation–related atrial tachycardia (AT) is complex and may demonstrate several forms: anatomic macroreentrant AT (AMAT), non-AMAT, and focal AT. We aimed to elucidate the recurrence rate and mechanisms of atrial fibrillation ablation–related AT recurrence.

Methods:

Among 147 patients with ATs treated with the Rhythmia system, 68 (46.3%) had recurrence at mean 4.2 (2.9–11.6) months, and 44 patients received a redo procedure. AT circuits in the first procedure were compared with those in the redo procedure.

Results:

Although mappable ATs were not observed in 7 patients, 68 ATs were observed in 37 patients during the first procedure: perimitral flutter (PMF) in 26 patients, roof-dependent macroreentrant AT (RMAT) in 18, peritricuspid flutter in 10, non-AMAT in 14, and focal AT in 3. During the redo AT ablation procedure, 54 ATs were observed in 41/44 patients: PMF in 24, RMAT in 14, peritricuspid flutter in 1, non-AMAT in 14, and focal AT in 1. Recurrence of PMF and RMAT was observed in 15 of 26 (57.7%) and 8 of 18 (44.4%) patients, respectively, while peritricuspid flutter did not recur. Neither the same focal AT nor the same non-AMAT were observed except in 1 case with septal scar–related biatrial AT. Epicardial structure–related ATs were involved in 18 of 24 (75.0%) patients in PMF, 4 of 14 (28.6%) in RMAT, and 4 of 14 (28.6%) in non-AMAT. Of 21 patients with a circuit including epicardial structures, 6 patients treated with ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall did not show any AT recurrence, although 8 of 15 (53.3%) treated with radiofrequency showed AT recurrence ( P =0.04).

Conclusions:

Although high-resolution mapping may lead to correct diagnosis and appropriate ablation in the first procedure, the recurrence rate is still high. The main mechanism of atrial fibrillation ablation–related AT is the recurrence of PMF and RMAT or non-AMAT different from the first procedure. Epicardial structures (eg, coronary sinus/vein of Marshall system) are often involved, and ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall may be an additional treatment.

A novel percutaneous stabilizing sheath for minimal invasive epicardial echocardiography and ablation

PURPOSE

Epicardial ablation and mapping are critical adjuncts to the electrophysiologist's approach to arrhythmias; however, ablation within the epicardial space requires the avoidance of coronary arteries (CA). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of a novel-stabilizing ablation sheath housing an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter to (1) obtain Epicardial Echocardiography (EE) images, (2) visualize CAs, and (3) enable targeted delivery of radiofrequency energy away from visualized CAs.

METHODS

We designed a sheath that could enclose a regular ICE catheter. This sheath has flanges and a balloon, with three interspersed windows surrounded by an electrode. In an acute canine model (N = 6), the sheath was manipulated within the pericardial space to visualize cardiac structures and CAs. Visualization of CAs was confirmed with angiography. Ablation was then performed through the window either proximal or distal to the CA.

RESULTS

The novel sheath was successfully deployed in six canines, with no acute procedural complications. Images with an excellent spatial resolution of cardiac structures were obtained including the right ventricular outflow tract; aortic, pulmonary, and mitral valves; and left atrial appendage. CAs were successfully visualized, and ablation from a sheath window either proximal or distal to the CA did not produce angiographic or histopathological evidence of CA damage despite evidence of acute injury to the adjacent ablated myocardium.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel percutaneous stabilizing sheath was able to successfully obtain high-quality EE images as well as provide a non-fluoroscopic intra-procedural means to visualize CAs. Use of this sheath enabled successful delivery of energy to avoided CA damage.

The role of Marshall bundle epicardial connections in atrial tachycardias after atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachycardias (ATs) are often seen in the context of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of the Marshall bundle (MB) network in left atrial (LA) ATs using high-density 3-dimensional mapping.

METHODS

A total of 199 ATs were mapped in 140 patients (112 male, mean age: 61.8 years); 133 (66.8%) were macroreentrant and 66 (33.2%) were scar-related reentry circuits. MB-dependent ATs were suggested by activation mapping analysis and confirmed with entrainment along the circuit.

RESULTS

The MB network participated in 60 (30.2%) reentrant ATs: 31 perimitral ATs (PMATs) and 29 localized reentry circuits. Of 60 MB-related ATs, 49 (81.6%) terminated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation: 44 (73.3%) at the MB-LA junction and 5 (8.3%) at the MB-coronary sinus (CS) junction, while 9 (15%) terminated after 2.5-5 cc of ethanol infusion inside the vein of Marshall (VOM). Of the 31 PMATs, 17 (54.8%) terminated at the MB-LA junction, 5 (16.1%) at the MB-CS junction, and 7 (22.6%) with ethanol infusion. Of the 29 localized reentry circuits using the MB, 27 (93.1%) terminated at the MB-LA junction, none at the MB-CS junction, and 2 (6.9%) after ethanol infusion. Recurrences were mostly observed after RF ablation (18 of 37 patients, 49%) compared to ethanol infusion (1 of 9 patients, 11%) (P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

MB reentrant ATs accounted for up to 30.2% of the left ATs after AF ablation. Ablation of the MB-LA or CS-MB connections or ethanol infusion inside the VOM is required to treat these arrhythmias.