Comparison of Acute Thrombogenicity for Metallic and Polymeric Bioabsorbable Scaffolds: Magmaris Versus Absorb in a Porcine Arteriovenous Shunt Model

Drug-eluting resorbable coronary scaffolds: a review of recent advances

INTRODUCTION

Device-related persistent adverse events with current DES-use have refocused the attention on a 'leave-nothing-behind' philosophy, in which it is hypothesized that treating coronary stenosis without permanently caging the vessel with a metallic implant would lead to superior clinical outcomes. One of these uncaging technologies is bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we describe the technical specifications and clinical data of currently available BRS devices.

EXPERT OPINION

Newer BRS devices have thinner struts and more biocompatible scaffold backbones (either polymer-based or metal-based), resulting in improved radial strength, faster resorption times, and more antithrombogenic properties (e.g. magnesium-based scaffolds). Results of BRS in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data. It is probable that over the next 5 years more fourth-generation devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and safety profiles will be investigated and released commercially, resulting in a much more prominent role for BRS, especially in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease in younger patients.

A novel stent flow chamber system demonstrates reduced thrombogenicity of bioresorbable magnesium scaffolds

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is characterized by narrowing and subsequent blockade of coronary arteries, and imposes a significant health and economic burden. Stent and scaffold devices are introduced in advanced CAD to improve vascular stability and restore blood flow. Although in vitro flow systems like the Chandler loop have been developed to enhance the understanding of interactions between device materials, their coatings, and vascular cells, imaging-based in vitro analysis of device performance is limited. In this study, we established a novel stent flow chamber system designed to assess the thrombogenicity of bioresorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) and stent materials in vitro. Additionally, we compared the thrombogenicity - an important clinical parameter in stent performance - of the Magmaris-316 L stainless steel stent with its predecessors, Magmaris RMS and a prototype of the third-generation RMS (DREAMS 3G). Analysis of platelet adhesion and coverage of the different devices under flow conditions demonstrated that the Magmaris RMS exhibits reduced thrombogenicity compared to the Magmaris-316 L stainless steel stent. Moreover, thrombogenicity of the DREAMS 3G prototype, composed of BIOmag material, is further decreased compared to its predecessors. The observed reduction in thrombogenicity of the DREAMS 3G prototype in vitro suggests additional improvements in clinical safety and efficacy, highlighting its promise for treating CAD. Future research on this prototype may thus open avenues for analyzing other blood components and patient-derived endothelial cells. In line with the 3R principles, this approach may also help reduce the need for animal testing.

Long-term outcomes following ultrathin vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

OBJECTIVES

Current thin-strut 2nd generation drug eluting stents (DES) are considered as optimal standard of care for revascularization of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ultrathin (≤ 70 μm strut thickness) strut DES have recently been shown to reduce target lesion failure (TLF) compared to thin-strut DES. Therefore, in order to assess the validity of improved outcomes associated with ultrathin-strut DES, we conducted an updated meta-analysis that includes recently published follow-ups of previously conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Scopus were queried from their inception to May 2024 to identify studies comparing outcomes between ultrathin and current thin-strut 2nd generation DES groups. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to derive risk ratios (RR) from dichotomous data. The primary endpoint was long-term TLF defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The secondary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, TV-MI and clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CD-TVR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs (n=22141) with a mean follow-up of 34 months were included. The risk of TLF was significantly lowered in the ultrathin DES group in comparison to thin-strut DES. A significant decrease was also noted in rates of TVF, CD-TLR and CD-TVR in the ultrathin DES vs thin-strut DES group.

CONCLUSION

The results of our analysis demonstrate a significantly reduced risk of TLF in the ultrathin DES group in comparison with thin-strut DES. Ultrathin DES was also associated with a significantly decreased risk of TVF, CD-TLR and CD-TVR.

Long-term outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

The higher scaffold thrombosis rates observed with the first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared to conventional drug-eluting stents were likely due in part to bioresorbable polymers having insufficient radial strength, necessitating larger strut profiles. Meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes from the first-generation Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) showed that this period of excess risk ended at 3 years. Therefore, current attention has been focused on improving early outcomes by increasing the scaffold's tensile strength and reducing strut thickness.

AREAS COVERED

This review summaries the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS. It updates the long-term clinical outcomes of trials evaluating the ABSORB BVS and metallic alloy-based BRS. In addition, it reviews the next-generation BRSs manufactured in Asia.

EXPERT OPINION

Critical areas to improve the performance and safety of biodegradable scaffolds include further development in material science, surface modification, delivery systems, and long-term follow-up studies.

Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Frontiers: A Dive Into Cutting-Edge Innovations in Coronary Stent Technology

Plain balloon angioplasty was the initial method used to enlarge the intracoronary lumen size. However, it was linked to acute coronary closure due to early vessel recoil. This led to the invention of coronary stents, which offer mechanical support to open and maintain the vascular lumen. Nevertheless, the metallic scaffold introduced other issues, such as thrombosis and restenosis caused by neointimal proliferation. To address these concerns, polymers were employed to cover the scaffold, acting as drug reservoirs and regulators for controlled drug release. The use of polymers prevents direct contact between blood and metallic scaffolds. Drugs within the stent were incorporated to inhibit proliferation and expedite endothelialization in the healing process. Despite these advancements, adverse effects still arise due to the inflammatory reaction caused by the polymer material. Consequently, resorbable polymers and scaffolds were later discovered, but they have limitations and are not universally applicable. Various scaffold designs, thicknesses, materials, polymer components, and drugs have their own advantages and complications. Each stent generation has been designed to address the shortcomings of the preceding generation, yet new challenges continue to emerge. Conflicting data regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of coronary stents, especially in the extended follow-up, further complicates the assessment.

Synchrotron microtomography reveals insights into the degradation kinetics of bio-degradable coronary magnesium scaffolds

Bioresorbable magnesium scaffolds are a promising future treatment option for coronary artery stenosis, especially for young adults. Due to the degradation of these scaffolds (<1 year), long-term device-related clinical events could be reduced compared to treatments with conventional drug eluting stents. First clinical trials indicate a return of vasomotion after one year, which may be associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes. However, even after decades of development, the degradation process, ideal degradation time and biological response in vivo are still not fully understood. The present study investigates the in vivo degradation of magnesium scaffolds in the coronary arteries of pigs influenced by different strut thicknesses and the presence of antiproliferative drugs. Due to high 3D image contrast of synchrotron-based micro-CT with phase contrast (SR-μCT), a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the degradation morphology of magnesium scaffolds was obtained. For the segmentation of the μCT images a convolutional network architecture (U-net) was exploited, demonstrating the huge potential of merging high resolution SR-μCT with deep learning (DL) supported data analysis. In total, 30 scaffolds, made of the rare earth alloy Resoloy®, with different strut designs were implanted into the coronary arteries of 10 domestic pigs for 28 days using drug-coated or uncoated angioplasty balloons for post-dilatation. The degradation morphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and SR-μCT. The data from these methods were then related to data from angiography, optical coherence tomography and histology. A thinner strut size (95 vs. 130 μm) and the presence of paclitaxel indicated a slower degradation rate at 28 d in vivo, which positively influences the late lumen loss (0.5 and 0.6 mm vs. 1.0 and 1.1 mm) and recoil values (0 and 1.7% vs. 6.1 and 22%).

Comparison of acute versus stable coronary syndrome in patients treated with the Magmaris scaffold: Two-year results from the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry

BACKGROUND

The magnesium Magmaris scaffold is the latest resorbable technology with low thrombogenicity, short scaffolding time, and almost complete resorption at 12 months (95 %). As compared with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. We analyzed the data of the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry to compare clinical outcomes in SCAD versus ACS patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the 24-month rates of target lesion failure (TLF) and scaffold thrombosis (ST). Device implantation procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations (proper patient/lesion selection, pre-dilatation, proper scaffold sizing, and post-dilatation). Dual antiplatelet therapy was terminated after 12 months.

RESULTS

Data from 207 patients (145 SCAD and 62 ACS) were collected from July 2016 to June 2018. The 2-year follow-up compliance was 92.8 % (192 patients). At 2 years, TLF rates were 7.4 % in the SCAD group and 8.8 % in the ACS group (p = 0.7); ST rates were 0 % in the SCAD group and 1.8 % in the ACS group (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

The 2-year clinical results from the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry are favorable in terms of TLF and ST, indicating the safety and effectiveness of the Magmaris scaffold in both SCAD and ACS patients.

Safety and efficacy of new-generation coronary bioresorbable scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was born with the aim to reduce the rate of late and very late cardiac events related to drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS failed to prove their short-term safety and efficacy. Based on data derived from early investigations, new-generation BRS have been developed and tested in preliminary studies. The present review's focus was to summarize the mechanical characteristics of these new scaffolds and the clinical evidence of their safety and efficacy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Biomed central databases were analyzed. Only papers published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were selected to summarize current evidence about new generation BRS, with CE mark approval. Overall, 23 studies were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data obtained from selected studies assessing the safety and efficacy of new generation BRS are encouraging. This is thanks to the progressive development of scaffolds with a different backbone structure and struts thickness that guarantee higher radial strength, flexibility, and resistance to fracture. These characteristics led to low rates of major adverse cardiac events and device-oriented composite endpoint at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

New-generation BRS have a good safety profile in stable patients with simple lesions, supported by a meticulous implantation technique. The first studies were performed on a small population with short-term follow-up, therefore new randomized clinical trials and registries are needed to expand the preliminary findings.

Long-term multimodality imaging follow-up of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffold: advantages and challenges

BACKGROUND

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) offers a non-invasive method of imaging bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the advantages and challenges using MSCT in the follow-up after BRS implantation.

METHOD

The BRS cohort consisting of 31 patients in the 'BRS in STEMI' trial was examined by multimodality imaging and followed long-term. Minimum lumen area (MLA) and average lumen area (ALA) were examined 12 and 36 months after BRS implantation with MSCT. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 12 months was used as a reference.

RESULTS

Measured by MSCT, the mean MLA was 0.05 ± 1.32 mm² ( P  = 0.85), but ALA was 1.32 (±2.59 mm², P  = 0.015) greater than by OCT. ALA and MLA did not change significantly from 12 to 36 months. MSCT identified all cases of restenosis but missed one patient with massive malapposition.

CONCLUSION

Our data support using MSCT in the follow-up after BRS implantation. Invasive investigation should still be considered for patients with unexplained symptoms.

Challenges of the newer generation of resorbable magnesium scaffolds: Lessons from failure mechanisms of the past generation

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome the obstacles of metallic stents, mostly related to sustained presence of metallic foreign body in the coronary vessel. Following earlier success of single-arm BRS studies, randomized controlled trials of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) showed poor long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in terms of scaffold thrombosis. BRS made from magnesium alloy provide a promising alternative in terms of radial force, strut thickness and, potentially lower thrombogenicity. A recent clinical study demonstrated that magnesium-based BRS seems to be promising with regards to the risk of scaffold thrombosis. In this review, our aim is to describe the issues that prevented Absorb BVS from achieving favorable outcomes, provide current status of existing BRS technologies and the challenges that newer generation BRSs need to overcome, and the results of clinical studies for commercially available magnesium-based BRS, which remain the only BRS actively studied in clinical practice.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) is the standard treatment for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) during STEMI represents a novel strategy without intravascular metal.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate 12-month healing response in an STEMI population after implantation of either the Absorb BRS or Xience DES (Abbott Vascular, USA).

METHODS

The present trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded, noninferiority study with planned inclusion of 120 patients with STEMI. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with Absorb BRS or Xience DES. Implantation result and healing response were evaluated by angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was minimum flow area (MFA) assessed at 12 months. Coronary stent healing index (CSHI) was calculated from OCT images.

RESULTS

Out of 66 included patients, 58 had follow-up OCT after 12 months, and 49 entered matched analysis. One death occurred in each group; none were stent-related. MFA was 5.13 ± 1.70 mm2 (95% CI, 4.44-5.82) in the BRS group compared with 6.30 ± 2.49 mm2 (95% CI, 5.22-7.37) (P = 0.06) in the DES group. Noninferiority could not be evaluated. CSHI for both groups had a median score of 3.

CONCLUSION

The DES group performed numerically better in primary and secondary endpoints, but the CSHI showed good stent healing in both groups.

Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS) Magmaris vs Biodegradable Polymer DES Ultimaster in NSTE-ACS Population-12-Month Clinical Outcome

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) setting is associated with a greater probability of device failure. The currently ongoing development of new scaffold technologies has concentrated an effort on improving the PCI outcomes, including the use of new biodegradable materials. This pilot study evaluates the performance of a magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris, Biotronik, Germany) in comparison to the sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable polymer stents (BP-SES) (Ultimaster, Terumo, Japan) in the NSTE-ACS setting.

Methods

The population of this pilot comprised 362 patients assigned to one of two arms (193-Magmaris vs 169-Ultimaster). The data regarding the primary outcome comprised of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, along with target-lesion failure (TLF) and other clinical events was collected in the 1-yearfollow-up.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes in the short term (30 days) or in the 1-yearfollow-up between both groups.

Conclusion

At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the Magmaris and Ultimaster for composed endpoints or the TLF.

Development of Innovative Biomaterials and Devices for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death worldwide. The increasing burden of cardiovascular diseases has become a major public health problem and how to carry out efficient and reliable treatment of cardiovascular diseases has become an urgent global problem to be solved. Recently, implantable biomaterials and devices, especially minimally invasive interventional ones, such as vascular stents, artificial heart valves, bioprosthetic cardiac occluders, artificial graft cardiac patches, atrial shunts, and injectable hydrogels against heart failure, have become the most effective means in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Herein, an overview of the challenges and research frontier of innovative biomaterials and devices for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is provided, and their future development directions are discussed.

Coronary Stenting: Reflections on a 35-Year Journey

Stenting was introduced as a therapy for coronary artery disease 35 years ago, and is currently the most commonly performed minimally invasive procedure globally. Percutaneous coronary revascularization, initially with plain old balloon angioplasty and later with stenting, has dramatically affected the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndromes. Coronary stenting is probably the most intensively studied therapy in medicine on the basis of the number of randomized clinical trials for a broad range of indications. Continuous improvements in stent materials, design, and coatings concurrent with procedural innovations have truly been awe-inspiring. The story of stenting is replete with high points and some low points, such as the initial experience with stent thrombosis and restenosis, and the more recent disappointment with bioabsorbable scaffolds. History has shown rapid growth of stent use with expansion of indications followed by contraction of some uses in response to clinical trial evidence in support of bypass surgery or medical therapy. In this review we trace the constantly evolving story of the coronary stent from the earliest experience until the present time. Undoubtedly, future iterations of stent design and materials will continue to move the stent story forward.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus conventional drug-eluting stents across time: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to reduce the rate of late adverse events observed in conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) by dissolving once they have restored lasting patency.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the safety and efficacy of BVS versus DES in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease across a complete range of randomised controlled trial (RCT) follow-up intervals.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from inception through 5 January 2022 for RCTs comparing the clinical outcomes of BVS versus DES. The primary safety outcome was stent/scaffold thrombosis (ST), and the primary efficacy outcome was target lesion failure (TLF: composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (ID-TLR)). Secondary outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (combining all-death, all-MI and all-revascularisation), its individual components and those of TLF. Studies were appraised using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.4.

RESULTS

11 919 patients were randomised to receive either BVS (n=6438) or DES (n=5481) across 17 trials (differing follow-up intervals from 3 months to 5 years). BVS demonstrated increased risk of ST across all timepoints (peaking at 2 years with risk ratio (RR): 3.47; 95% CI 1.80 to 6.70; p=0.0002). Similarly, they showed increased risk of TLF (peaking at 3 years, RR: 1.35; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.70; p=0.01) resulting from high rates of TVMI and ID-TLR. Though improvements were observed after device dissolution (5-year follow-up), these were non-significant. All other outcomes were statistically equivalent. Applicability to all BVS is limited by 91% of the BVS group receiving Abbott's Absorb.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that current BVS are inferior to contemporary DES throughout the first 5 years at minimum.

In-vivo evaluation of molybdenum as bioabsorbable stent candidate

Biodegradable stents have tremendous theoretical potential as an alternative to bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Any bioresorbable or biodegradable scaffold material needs to possess optimal mechanical properties and uniform degradation behavior that avoids local and systemic toxicity. Recently, molybdenum (Mo) has been investigated as a potential novel biodegradable material for this purpose. With its proven moderate degradation rate and excellent mechanical properties, Mo may represent an ideal source material for clinical cardiac and vascular applications. The present study was performed to evaluate the mechanical performance of metallic Mo in vitro and the biodegradation properties in vivo. The results demonstrated favorable mechanical behavior and a uniform degradation profile as desired for a new generation ultra-thin degradable endovascular stent material. Moreover, Mo implants in mouse arteries avoided the typical cellular response that contributes to restenosis. There was minimal neointimal hyperplasia over 6 months, an absence of excessive smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation or inflammation near the implant, and avoidance of significant harm to regenerating endothelial cells (EC). Qualitative inspection of kidney sections showed a potentially pathological remodeling of kidney Bowman's capsule and glomeruli, indicative of impaired filtering function and development of kidney disease, although quantifications of these morphological changes were not statistically significant. Together, the results suggest that the products of Mo corrosion may exert beneficial or inert effects on the activities of inflammatory and arterial cells, while exerting potentially toxic effects in the kidneys that warrant further investigation.

•

Mo implants in mouse arteries avoided neointimal hyperplasia over 6 months.

•

Quantification of CD31-labeled arterial sections showed an avoidance of significant harm to regenerating endothelial cells for the Mo implants.

•

Qualitative inspection of kidney sections showed a potential pathological remodeling, indicative of possible impaired filtering function.

Long-Term Performance of the Magmaris Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Metallic Scaffold in All-Comers Patients’ Population

Background: The long-term efficacy and safety of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in real world clinical practice including Magmaris need to be elucidated to better understand performance of this new and evolutive technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term performance of Magmaris, drug-eluting bioresorbable metallic scaffold, in all-comers patients’ population. Methods: We included in this prospective registry first 54 patients (54 ± 11 years; male 46) treated with Magmaris, with at least 30 months of follow-up. Diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome were present in 33 (61%) and 30 (56%) of the patients, respectively. Patients were followed for device- and patient-oriented cardiac events during a median follow-up of 47 months (DOCE–cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization; POCE–all cause death, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization). Results: Event-free survivals for DOCE and POCE were 86.8% and 79.2%, respectively. The rate of DOCE was 7/54 (13%), including in total target vessel myocardial infarction in two patients (4%), target lesion revascularization in six patients (11%), and no cardiac deaths. The rate of POCE was 11/54 (21%), including in total any myocardial infarctions in 3 patients (6%), any revascularization in 11 patients (20%), and no deaths. Definite Magmaris thrombosis occurred in two patients (3.7%), and in-scaffold restenosis developed in five patients (9.3%). Variables associated with DOCE were implantation of ≥2 Magmaris BVS (HR: 5.4; 95%CI: 1.21–24.456; p = 0.027) and total length of Magmaris BVS ≥ 40 mm (HR: 6.4; 95%CI: 1.419–28.855; p = 0.016), whereas previous PCI was the only independent predictor of POCE (HR: 7.4; 95%CI: 2.216–24.613; p = 0.001). Conclusions: The results of the long-term clinical outcome following Magmaris implantation in patients with complex clinical and angiographic features were acceptable and promising. Patients with multi-BVS and longer multi-BVS in lesion implantation were associated with worse clinical outcome.

Outcomes of the two generations of bioresorbable scaffolds (Magmaris vs. Absorb) in acute coronary syndrome in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as a clinical manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity, as reported worldwide annually. The second generation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is a gold standard in percutaneous interventions in ACS patients however, permanent caging of the vessel with metallic DES has some drawbacks. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) were designed as a temporal vessel-supporting technology allowing for anatomical and functional restoration. Nevertheless, following the initial encouraging reports, numerous concerns about the safety of BRS occurred.

METHODS

In this study, a 1-year performance of 193 patients with magnesium BRS - Magmaris (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) was evaluated in comparison to 160 patients with polymer BRS - Absorb (Abbott-Vascular, Chicago, USA) in the non-ST-segment elevation-ACS setting.

RESULTS

The Magmaris, when compared to Absorb showed a significantly lower rate of primary endpoint (death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis) as well as target lesion failure in 30-day and 1 year follow-up. In the Absorb group, a significantly higher rate of stent thrombosis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the present study suggests encouraging safety a profile and more favorable clinical outcomes of Magnesium BRS in comparison to the polymer Absorb - BRS.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting magnesium bioresorbable scaffolds: optical coherence tomography insights

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of sirolimus-eluting magnesium bioresorbable scaffolds (MgS) in the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The better option for the treatment of patients with ISR remains unsettled. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds represent an interesting strategy in this setting to avoid another permanent metal layer. The novel MgS is an attractive option to treat these challenging patients.

METHODS

We present the results of the first prospective series of consecutive patients with ISR treated with MgS under optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients (15 lesions) were prospectively included. The mean age was 67 ± 9 years and six patients (40%) presented with an acute coronary syndrome. In 10 patients (67%), underlying neoatherosclerosis was disclosed by OCT. An excellent MgS expansion was obtained in all but two patients who showed persistent suboptimal expansion in heavily calcified vessels. Minor residual malapposition (n = 5) and angiographically silent minor edge dissections (n = 8) were readily recognized by OCT. After a median clinical follow-up of 30 (range, 20-54) months, no patient required repeated revascularization, suffered a myocardial infarction or device thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest a potential role for the MgS in selected patients presenting with ISR.

Bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in the treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions: The BIFSORB pilot II study

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and healing response of a magnesium‐based bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) in the treatment of simple bifurcation lesions using the single stent provisional technique.

Background

BRS may hold potential advantages in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, however low radial strength and expansion capacity has been an issue with polymer‐based scaffolds. The magnesium BRS may prove suitable for bifurcation treatment as its mechanical properties are closer to those of permanent metallic drug‐eluting stents.

Methods

The study was a proof‐of‐concept study with planned inclusion of 20 patients with stable angina pectoris and a bifurcation lesion involving a large side branch (SB) > 2.5 mm with less than 50% diameter stenosis. Procedure and healing response were evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main endpoints were a composite clinical safety endpoint and an OCT healing index at 1 month (range: 0–98).

Results

Eleven patients were included in the study. The study was prematurely terminated due to scaffold fractures and embolization of scaffold fragments in three cases requiring bailout stenting with drug‐eluting stents. One patient underwent bypass surgery at 3 months due to stenosis proximal to the study segment. All SB were patent for 1 month. One‐month OCT evaluation showed strut coverage of 96.9% and no malapposition. Scaffold fractures and uncovered jailing struts resulted in a less favorable mean OCT healing index score of 10.4 ± 9.0.

Conclusions

Implanting a magnesium scaffold by the provisional technique in nontrue bifurcation lesions was associated with scaffold fracture, embolization of scaffold fragments, and a high need for bailout stenting.

Overcoming challenges in refining the current generation of coronary stents

INTRODUCTION

Late stent thrombosis caused by delayed vascular healing and prolonged local inflammation were major drawbacks of 1^st generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Strut design, biocompatibility of polymer, and drug-release profiles were improved in 2^nd and 3rdgeneration DES. Accordingly, the indications for percutaneous coronary intervention with DES have been expanded to more complex patients and lesions. Despite these improvements, significant barriers such as greater flexibility in the duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as well as reducing long-term stent-related events remain. To achieve ideal short- and long-term results, these existing limitations need to be overcome.

AREAS COVERED

We will discuss the current limitations of coronary DES and how they might be overcome from pathological and clinical viewpoints.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimizing DAPT duration after stent implantation and prevention of in-stent neoatherosclerosis are two major issues in current DES. Overcoming these drawbacks is a prerequisite toward achieving better short- and long-term clinical outcomes. New technologies including platform design, polymer types, and anti-proliferative agent itself might lead to further improvements. Although the initial experience with bioresorbable scaffold/stents (BRS) was disappointing, positive results of clinical studies regarding novel BRS are raising expectations. Overall, further device innovation is desired for overcoming the limitations of current DES.

The resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris in acute coronary syndrome: An appraisal of evidence and user group guidance

Bioresorbable scaffolds provide transient vessel support without the long-term limitations of permanent metallic drug-eluting stents. The sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris is the only CE-marked metallic bioresorbable scaffold and provides short-term lumen support before being completely bioresorbed. To date, clinical trial results have demonstrated low adverse event rates in patients with simple coronary lesions. Seven European centers with large experience in Magmaris implantation, combined efforts in an informal collaboration to evaluate and appraise clinical data currently available regarding the performance of Magmaris in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, and to supply user-advice on patient selection and optimal implantation practice.

The 1-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Magmaris, Novel Magnesium Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major risk factors contributing to Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) and is associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even when the second generation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is used. In order to overcome the disadvantages of permanent caging of a vessel with metallic DES, bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology has been recently developed. However, the prognosis of patients with DM and ACS treated with PCI via subsequent implantation of Magmaris (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany)—a novel magnesium-bioresorbable scaffold—is poorly investigated. Methods: A total of 193 consecutive subjects with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who, from October 2016 to March 2020, received one or more Magmaris scaffolds were enrolled in this study. The diabetic group was compared with non-diabetic subjects. Results: There were no significant differences in the occurrence of primary endpoints (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and in-stent thrombosis) and principal secondary endpoints (target-lesion failure, scaffold restenosis, death from any reason, and other cardiovascular events) between the two compared groups in a 1-year follow-up period. Conclusions: The early 1-year-outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) seems to be favorable and suggests that this novel BRS is safe and effective in subjects with NSTE-ACS and co-existing DM.

Long-term follow-up after ultrathin vs. conventional 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Contemporary 2nd-generation thin-strut drug-eluting stents (DES) are considered standard of care for revascularization of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A previous meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 11 658 patients demonstrated a 16% reduction in the 1-year risk of target lesion failure (TLF) with ultrathin-strut DES compared with conventional 2nd-generation thin-strut DES. Whether this benefit is sustained longer term is not known, and newer trial data may inform these relative outcomes. We therefore sought to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing clinical outcomes with ultrathin-strut DES (≤70 µm strut thickness) with conventional 2nd-generation thin-strut DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of all RCTs comparing ultrathin-strut DES to conventional 2nd-generation thin-strut DES. The pre-specified primary endpoint was long-term TLF, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Secondary endpoints included the components of TLF, stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause death. There were 16 eligible trials in which 20 701 patients were randomized. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 2.5 years. Ultrathin-strut DES were associated with a 15% reduction in long-term TLF compared with conventional 2nd-generation thin-strut DES [relative risk (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.96, P = 0.008] driven by a 25% reduction in CD-TLR (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.92, P = 0.005). There were no significant differences between stent types in the risks of MI, ST, cardiac death, or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, ultrathin-strut DES reduced the risk of TLF, driven by less CD-TLR compared with conventional 2nd-generation thin-strut DES, with similar risks of MI, ST, cardiac death, and all-cause mortality.

Long-term clinical, angiographic, and optical coherence tomography findings of Mg-based bioresorbable scaffold in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

This study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffolds (MgBRS) in the context of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at long-term follow-up (24 months). The study also aims to investigate the MgBRS performance by angiography and the healing and bioresorption pattern by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 18 months.

METHODS

Between December 2016 and December 2018, a total of 90 patients admitted for ACS and treated with MgBRS (Magmaris, Biotronik AG, Bülach, Switzerland) were enrolled in a multicenter prospective study. Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients at 24 months and angiographic and OCT follow-up in 51.5% of patients at 18 months. Serial OCT was available in 33 patients (36.7%).

RESULTS

At a 2-year follow-up, 88.8% were free of symptoms, no cardiac death was reported, and the device-oriented composite event (DOCE): consisting of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 13.3%. Stent thrombosis and TLR were observed in 2.2 and 11.1%, respectively. Binary restenosis was observed in 21.7% of cases and in-stent late lumen loss was 0.61 ± 0.75 mm. By serial OCT imaging, the minimal lumen area was significantly reduced greater than 40% (from 6.12 ± 1.59 to 3.5 ± 1.55 mm2, p < .001). At follow-up, area stenosis was 44.33 ± 23.07% and half of the patients presented indiscernible struts. The principal observed mechanism of restenosis was scaffold collapse.

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up, MgBRS implantation in ACS patients showed a high rate of DOCE, mainly caused by clinically driven TLR. MgBRS restenosis was caused by scaffold collapse in most of the cases.

Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario

Background: After the bioresorbable PLLA-based vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) was taken from the market due to its high adverse event rates, a magnesium-based scaffold (Magmaris) was introduced. Objective: To compare the acute performance of the sirolimus-eluting magnesium alloy Magmaris scaffold with that of the novolimus-eluting PLLA-based DESolve scaffold in terms of appropriate scaffold deployment using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods and Results: Data from the final OCT pullback of 98 patients were included (19 Magmaris, 79 DESolve) and analyzed at 1-mm intervals. The following indices were calculated: mean and minimal area, residual area stenosis, incomplete strut apposition, tissue prolapse, eccentricity index, symmetry index, strut fracture, and edge dissection. OCT showed a minimum lumen area for Magmaris vs. DESolve of 6.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.0 ± 1.9 (p = 0.06). Scaffolds with residual area stenosis >20% were predominantly seen in the DESolve group (15.8 vs. 46.8%; p = 0.01). The mean eccentricity index did differ significantly (0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.63 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). No fractures were observed for Magmaris scaffolds, but 15.2% were documented for DESolve BRS (p < 0.001). Incomplete scaffold apposition area was significantly higher in the DESolve group (0.01 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 2.32 mm²; p < 0.001). Conclusion: This is the first study to compare the acute mechanical performance between Magmaris and DESolve in a real-world setting. The acute mechanical performance of Magmaris BRS seems to be superior to that of DESolve BRS, whereas OCT showed a good acute mechanical performance for both BRS in terms of generally accepted imaging criteria.

Effect of Procedural Technique on Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation

BACKGROUND

This study sought to assess target lesion failure (TLF) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 1 year following second-generation drug-eluting magnesium scaffold (Magmaris) implantation using a dedicated technique (so-called "4 P's" strategy).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 4 P's strategy stands for: correct patient selection, proper scaffold sizing, pre-dilatation (<20% residual stenosis), post-dilatation. All the patient and lesion characteristics, preparation, and sizing of the device were compared in patients with TLF and CD-TLR through 1-year follow-up. We analyzed 315 patients for this study. At 1 year, there were 14 TLFs and 10 CD-TLRs. The TLF rates were 7.7%, 4.9%, and 4.1%; while the CD-TLR rates were 7.7%, 2.5%, and 3.2% in the undersized, properly sized, and oversized vessel groups, correspondingly. Diameter stenosis (DS) after pre-dilatation in patients with TLF and CD-TLR was significantly greater than in those without TLF and CD-TLR. In patients with a properly sized scaffold, DS after pre-dilatation was similar in patients with and without TLF and CD-TLR. However, in patients with non-properly sized scaffolds, greater post-balloon DS was observed in patients with TLF and CD-TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Improper sizing and poor lesion preparation before Magmaris implantation appear to be related to TLF during 1-year follow-up.

High Magnesium and Sirolimus on Rabbit Vascular Cells-An In Vitro Proof of Concept

Drug-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds represent the last frontier in the field of angioplasty and stenting to treat coronary artery disease, one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In particular, sirolimus-eluting magnesium-based scaffolds were recently introduced in clinical practice. Magnesium alloys are biocompatible and dissolve in body fluids, thus determining high concentrations of magnesium in the local microenvironment. Since magnesium regulates cell growth, we asked whether high levels of magnesium might interfere with the antiproliferative action of sirolimus. We performed in vitro experiments on rabbit coronary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cells (rCAEC and rSMC, respectively). The cells were treated with sirolimus in the presence of different concentrations of extracellular magnesium. Sirolimus inhibits rCAEC proliferation only in physiological concentrations of magnesium, while high concentrations prevent this effect. On the contrary, high extracellular magnesium does not rescue rSMC growth arrest by sirolimus and accentuates the inhibitory effect of the drug on cell migration. Importantly, sirolimus and magnesium do not impair rSMC response to nitric oxide. If translated into a clinical setting, these results suggest that, in the presence of sirolimus, local increases of magnesium concentration maintain normal endothelial proliferative capacity and function without affecting rSMC growth inhibition and response to vasodilators.

SICI-GISE position document on the use of the Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold in clinical practice

Bioresorbable scaffolds have emerged as a potential breakthrough for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. The need for drug release and plaque scaffolding is temporary, and leaving a permanent stent once the process of plaque recoil and vessel healing has ended might be superfluous or even deleterious exposing the patient to the risk of very late thrombosis, eliminating vessel reactivity, impairing non-invasive imaging and precluding possible future surgical revascularization. This long-term potential limitation of permanent bare metal stents might be overcome by using a resorbable scaffold. The metallic and antithrombotic properties make the resorbable magnesium scaffold an appealing technology for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. Notwithstanding this, its mechanical properties substantially differ from those of conventional bare metal stents, and previous experience using polymer-based scaffolds has shown that a standardized implantation technique and optimal patient and lesion selection are key factors for a successful implantation. A panel of expert cardiologists gathered to find a consensus on the best practices for Magmaris implantation in a selected patient population and to discuss the rationale for new potential future indications.

Inflammation as a determinant of healing response after coronary stent implantation

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide. Inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions. Data on stent elements that lead to excessive inflammatory response, proper identification of high-risk patients, prevention and treatment targeting residual inflammatory risk are limited. This review aims to present the role of inflammation in the context of evolving stent technologies and appraise the potential imaging modalities in detection of inflammatory response and anti-inflammatory therapies.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic implants not only prevents the process of positive vessel remodeling and the restoration of vascular physiology but also makes the future revascularization of target vessels more difficult. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have been developed as a potential solution to avoid the above adverse reactions caused by permanent metallic devices. BRSs provide temporary support to the vessel wall in the short term and then gradually degrade over time to restore the natural state of coronary arteries. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up of large-scale trials has drawn considerable attention to the safety of BRSs, and the significantly increased risk of late scaffold thrombosis (ScT) limits its clinical application. In this review, we summarize the current status and clinical experiences of BRSs to understand the application prospects and limitations of these devices. In addition, we focus on ScT after implantation, as it is currently the primary drawback of BRS. We also analyze the causes of ScT and discuss improvements required to overcome this serious drawback and to move the field forward.

Randomized Comparison of the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent With the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in an All-Comers Population Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background:

In patients with increased bleeding risk, the biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent, a stainless steel drug-coated stent free from polymer, has shown superiority compared with a bare-metal stent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the BioFreedom stent is noninferior to a modern ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers patient population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods:

The SORT OUT IX trial (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IX), was a large-scale, registry-based, randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial. The primary end point, major adverse cardiovascular events, was defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not related to any segment other than the target lesion, or target lesion revascularization within 1 year, analyzed by intention-to-treat. The trial was powered to assess noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events of the BioFreedom stent compared with the Orsiro stent with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 0.021.

Results:

Between December 14, 2015 and April 21, 2017, 3151 patients were assigned to treatment with the BioFreedom stent (1572 patients, 1966 lesions) or to the Orsiro stent (1579 patients, 1985 lesions). Five patients were lost to follow-up because of emigration (99.9% follow-up rate). Mean age was 66.3±10.9, diabetes mellitus was seen in 19.3% of patients, and 53% of the patients had acute coronary syndromes. At 1 year, intention-to-treat analysis showed that 79 (5.0%) patients, who were assigned the BioFreedom stent, and 59 (3.7%), who were assigned the Orsiro stent, met the primary end point (absolute risk difference 1.29% [upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 2.50%]; P noni nferiority =0.14). Significantly more patients in the BioFreedom stent group had target lesion revascularization than those in the Orsiro stent group (55 [3.5%] vs 20 [1.3%], rate ratio 2.77 [95% CI, 1.66–4.62]; P <0.0001).

Conclusions:

The biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom polymer-free stent did not meet criteria for noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months when compared with the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02623140.

Procedural microvascular activation in long lesions treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds or everolimus-eluting stents: the PROACTIVE trial

AIMS

Significant platelet activation after long stented coronary segments has been associated with periprocedural microvascular impairment and myonecrosis. In long lesions treated either with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or an everolimus-eluting stent (EES), we aimed to investigate (a) procedure-related microvascular impairment, and (b) the relationship of platelet activation with microvascular function and related myonecrosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n=66) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in long lesions were randomised 1:1 to either BVS or EES. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in changes of pressure-derived corrected index of microvascular resistance (cIMR) after PCI. Periprocedural myonecrosis was assessed by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), platelet reactivity by high-sensitivity adenosine diphosphate (hs-ADP)-induced platelet reactivity with the Multiplate Analyzer. Post-dilatation was more frequent in the BVS group, with consequent longer procedure time. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in the primary endpoint of ΔcIMR (p=0.04). hs-ADP was not different between the groups at different time points. hs-cTnT significantly increased after PCI, without difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In long lesions, BVS implantation is associated with significant acute reduction in IMR as compared with EES, with no significant interaction with platelet reactivity or periprocedural myonecrosis.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Technology and Future Perspectives

Metallic drug-eluting stents have led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes but are inherently limited by their caging of the vessel wall. Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have emerged in an effort to overcome these limitations, allowing a "leave nothing behind" approach. Although theoretically appealing, the initial experience with BRS technology was limited by increased rates of scaffold thrombosis compared with contemporary stents. This review gives a broad outline of the current BRS technologies and outlines the refinements in BRS design, procedural approach, lesion selection, and post-procedural care that resulted from early BRS trials.

Are we curing one evil with another? A translational approach targeting the role of neoatherosclerosis in late stent failure

Neoatherosclerosis is defined as foamy macrophage infiltration into the peri-strut or neointimal area after stent implantation, potentially leading to late stent failure through progressive atherosclerotic changes including calcification, fibroatheroma, thin-cap fibroatheroma, and rupture with stent thrombosis (ST) in advanced stages. Human autopsy as well as intravascular imaging studies have led to the understanding of neoatherosclerosis formation as a similar but significantly accelerated pathophysiology as compared to native atherosclerosis. This acceleration is mainly based on disrupted endothelial integrity with insufficient barrier function and augmented transmigration of lipids following vascular injury after coronary intervention and especially after implantation of drug-eluting stents. In this review, we summarize translational insights into disease pathophysiology and discuss therapeutic approaches to tackle this novel disease entity. We introduce a novel animal model of neoatherosclerosis alongside accompanying in vitro experiments, which show impaired endothelial integrity causing increased permeability for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol resulting in foam cell transformation of human monocytes. In addition, we discuss novel intravascular imaging surrogates to improve reliable diagnosis of early stage neoatherosclerosis. Finally, a therapeutic approach to prevent in-stent neoatherosclerosis with magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffolds and systemic statin treatment demonstrated the potential to improve arterial healing and re-endothelialization, leading to significantly mitigated neoatherosclerosis formation in an animal model of neoatherosclerosis.

Mechanism of Drug-Eluting Absorbable Metal Scaffold Restenosis

Background:

The pathomechanisms underlying restenosis of the bioabsorbable sirolimus-eluting metallic scaffold (Magmaris) remain unknown. Using serial optical coherence tomography, we investigated causes of restenosis, including the contribution of late scaffold recoil versus neointimal hyperplasia.

Methods:

Patients enrolled in BIOSOLVE-II undergoing serial angiography and optical coherence tomography (post-intervention and follow-up: 6 months and/or 1 year) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to angiographic in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) <0.5 or ≥0.5 mm. End points were late absolute scaffold recoil and neointimal hyperplasia area as assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Results:

Serial data were available for analysis from 70 patients (LLL <0.5 mm: n=41; LLL ≥0.5 mm: n=29). Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable, and there was no significant difference in mean and minimal scaffold area between groups at post-intervention. Late absolute scaffold recoil was less among patients with LLL <0.5 mm (0.53±0.68 mm 2 ) compared with those with LLL ≥0.5 mm (1.48±1.20 mm 2 ; P <0.001). Neointimal hyperplasia area was smaller among patients with LLL <0.5 mm at follow-up (1.47±0.33 mm 2 ) compared with patients with LLL ≥0.5 mm (1.68±0.34 mm 2 ; P =0.013). In a matched-frame analysis (post-intervention and follow-up), late absolute scaffold recoil varied according to the underlying plaque type (lipid: 0.63±1.23 mm 2 ; calcified: 0.81±1.44 mm 2 ; and fibrous: 1.20±1.52 mm 2 ; P <0.001), while there was no difference with regards to neointimal hyperplasia area ( P =0.132).

Conclusions:

In addition to neointimal hyperplasia, late scaffold recoil contributed significantly to LLL of sirolimus-eluting absorbable metal scaffolds. The extent of late scaffold recoil was dependent on the underlying plaque morphology and was the highest among fibrotic lesions.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01960504.

Histopathologic and physiologic effect of bifurcation stenting: current status and future prospects

Introduction: Coronary bifurcation lesions are involved in up to 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, bifurcation lesion intervention is associated with a high complication rate, and optimal treatment of coronary bifurcation is an ongoing debate.Areas covered: Both different stenting techniques and a variety of devices have been suggested for bifurcation treatment, including the use of conventional coronary stents, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS), drug-eluting balloons (DEB), and stents dedicated to bifurcations. This review will summarize different therapeutic approaches with their advantages and shortcomings, with special emphasis on histopathologic and physiologic effects of each treatment strategy.Expert opinion: Histopathology and clinical data have shown that a more simple treatment strategy is beneficial in bifurcation lesions, achieving superior results. Bifurcation interventions through balloon angioplasty or placement of stents can importantly alter the bifurcation's geometry and accordingly modify local flow conditions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have shown that the outcome of bifurcation interventions is governed by local hemodynamic shear conditions. Minimizing detrimental flow conditions as much as possible should be the ultimate strategy to achieve long-term success of bifurcation interventions.