Incidence of Timely Outpatient Follow-Up Care After Emergency Department Encounters for Acute Heart Failure

Can Timely Outpatient Visits Reduce Readmissions and Mortality Among Heart Failure Patients?

BACKGROUND

Outpatient follow-up after a hospital discharge may reduce the risk of readmissions, but existing evidence has methodological limitations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess effect of outpatient follow-up within 7, 14, 21 and 30 days of a hospital discharge on 30-day unplanned readmissions or mortality among heart failure (HF) patients; and whether this varies for patients with different clinical complexities.

DESIGN

We analyzed medical records between January 2016 and December 2021 from a prospective cohort study. Using time varying mixed effects parametric survival models, we examined the association between not having an outpatient follow-up and risk of adverse events. We used interaction models to assess if the effect of outpatient follow-up visit on outcomes varies with patients' clinical complexity (comorbidities, grip strength, cognitive impairment and length of inpatient stay).

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and forty-one patients with advanced HF.

MAIN MEASURES

30-day all-cause (or cardiac) adverse event defined as all cause (or cardiac) unplanned readmissions or death within 30 days of an unplanned all-cause (or cardiac) admission or emergency department visit.

KEY RESULTS

We analyzed 1595 all-cause admissions, inclusive of 1266 cardiac admissions. Not having an outpatient follow-up (vs having an outpatient follow-up) significantly increased the risk of 30-day all-cause adverse event. (risk [95% CI] - 14 days: 35.1 [84.5,-1.1]; 21 days: 43.9 [48.2,6.7]; 30 days: 31.1 [48.5, 7.9]) The risk (at 21 days) was higher for those with one co-morbidity (0.25 [0.11,0.58]), mild (0.67 [0.45, 1.00]) and moderate cognitive impairment (0.38 [0.17, 0.84]), normal grip strength (0.57 [0.34, 0.96]) and length of inpatient stay 7-13 days (0.45 [0.23, 0.89]).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient follow-up within 30 days after a hospital discharge reduced risk of 30-day adverse events among HF patients, the benefit varying according to clinical complexity. Results suggest the need to prioritize patients who benefit from outpatient follow-up for these visits.

Emergency Department Use and Hospital Mortality Among Heart Transplant Recipients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Annual heart transplant (HT) volumes have increased, as have post-HT outpatient care needs. Data on HT-related emergency department (ED) visits are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of 177 450 HT patient ED visits from the 2009 to 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was conducted. HT recipients, primary diagnoses, and comorbidities associated with ED visits were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict outcomes of hospital admission and death. HT volumes and HT-related ED visits increased from 2009 to 2018. Infection was the most common primary diagnosis (24%), and cardiac primary diagnoses represented 10% of encounters. Hospital admissions occurred in 48% of visits, but overall mortality was low (1.6%). Length of stay was 3.1 days (interquartile range, 1.6-5.9 days), and comorbidity burden was high: 42% had hypertension, 38% had diabetes, and 31% had ≥2 comorbidities. Those aged ≥65 years had significantly higher odds of admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.14 [95% CI, 1.97-2.33]) and death (OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.61-2.62]). Comorbidities increased odds of admission (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.51-1.75]) but not death. Renal primary diagnosis had the highest risk of admission (OR, 4.1 [95% CI, 3.6-4.6]), but cardiac primary diagnosis had the highest odds of death (OR, 11.6 [95% CI, 9.1-14.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

HT-related ED visits increased from 2009 to 2018 with high admission rates but low in-hospital mortality, suggesting an opportunity to improve prehospital care. Older patients and those with cardiac primary diagnoses had the highest risk of death. The observed contrast between predictors of admission and mortality signals a need for further study to improve risk stratification and outpatient care strategies.

Strategies to mitigate emergency department crowding and its impact on cardiovascular patients

Emergency department (ED) crowding is a worsening global problem caused by hospital capacity and other health system challenges. While patients across a broad spectrum of illnesses may be affected by crowding in the ED, patients with cardiovascular emergencies-such as acute coronary syndrome, malignant arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, acute aortic syndrome, and cardiac tamponade-are particularly vulnerable. Because of crowding, patients with dangerous and time-sensitive conditions may either avoid the ED due to anticipation of extended waits, leave before their treatment is completed, or experience delays in receiving care. In this educational paper, we present the underlying causes of crowding and its impact on common cardiovascular emergencies using the input-throughput-output process framework for patient flow. In addition, we review current solutions and potential innovations to mitigate the negative effect of ED crowding on patient outcomes.