Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients

Early Outcomes in Severely Obese Patients Undergoing Sternum-Sparing Minimally Invasive Multivessel Artery Bypass Grafting Using Total Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy

Background/Objectives: Severe obesity significantly increases the risk of complications following full sternotomy in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, these patients are frequently excluded from less invasive, sternum-sparing surgical alternatives. This study aimed to assess the safety and practicality of a newly developed technique-Total Coronary Revascularization via left Anterior miniThoracotomy (TCRAT)-that avoids sternotomy in patients with severe obesity requiring multivessel CABG. Methods: From November 2019 to May 2024, a total of 502 non-emergency patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent CABG through a left anterior minithoracotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest. Of these, 43 patients with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 35.0 kg/m2 were classified as severely obese and included for subgroup analysis. Their outcomes were compared to those of the remaining 459 patients with BMI below 35.0 kg/m2. Key intraoperative variables-such as total operative time, CPB duration, aortic cross-clamp time, and graft strategy-were evaluated. Postoperative outcomes, such as the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, minor complications, and length of stay in ICU and hospital, were also analyzed. Results: Severely obese patients exhibited a longer total operation time (353.5 ± 83.6 min vs. 320.4 ± 73.4 min, p < 0.05). In contrast, no statistical differences were observed in aortic cross-clamp time (97.9 ± 27.6 min vs. 95.6 ± 33.0 min; p = 0.307) or CPB time (163.3 ± 35.0 min vs. 155.0 ± 42.9 min; p = 0.078). Both groups received a similar number of distal anastomoses (3.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8; p = 0.194), and the frequency of total arterial revascularization was comparable (34.9% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.268). There were no differences between the groups in major complications, including hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.227), stroke (0.0% vs. 0.6% p = 0.300), or need for re-revascularization (0.0% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.248). Similarly, minor complications, such as wound healing issues (2.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.233) and revisions for bleeding (4.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.276), were comparable between groups. ICU stay (2.7 ± 4.5 days vs. 2.2 ± 4.0 days; p = 0.225) and total hospital stay (12.3 ± 9.6 days vs. 10.8 ± 8.6 days; p = 0.142) showed no meaningful differences. Conclusions: TCRAT can be performed safely and effectively in severely obese patients, providing a feasible minimally invasive option for complete coronary revascularization in cases of multivessel disease. This approach eliminates the complications associated with sternotomy, making it a valuable surgical alternative for this high-risk patient group.

Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of 597 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Multi-Vessel Coronary Off-Pump Bypass Surgery

Background: Minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) through left anterior mini-thoracotomy avoids both extracorporeal circulation and sternotomy and is a very elegant, safe, and effective surgical technique, despite its still-limited adoption in the daily toolkit of cardiac surgeons. The goal of this retrospective, single-centre analysis was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of a large patient cohort undergoing MICS CABG. Methods: This study identified 597 consecutive MICS CABG patients from August 2008 to November 2020. We obtained follow-up data by phone or mail. Every patient had a left internal thoracic artery bypass graft. The second and possibly third grafts were radial arteries, great saphenous vein segments, or right internal thoracic arteries. Results: The median age was 69 years, and 92.1% were male. The median EuroSCORE II was 1.5. There were eight conversions to sternotomy and none to cardiopulmonary bypass. The total arterial revascularisation was 92.5%, with 90.3% complete. The 30-day mortality was 0.5%. A total of 575 patients (95.8%) were tracked for 8 years on average. A Cox regression analysis found that a left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and a history of cerebrovascular accident independently predicted severe adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and late death. The actuarial survival rates for one, three, five, eight, and ten years were 99%, 95%, 91%, 85%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: In our study group, the technique of MICS CABG has been proven to be a safe and effective surgical revascularisation method, with a low rate of early complications and favourable long-term outcomes in eligible patients.

Endoscopic-Assisted Multivessel Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Experience of the First 100 Procedures

Background

This study presents an overview of our technique and the perioperative outcomes for the first 100 patients who underwent minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted off-pump multivessel bypass grafting (endoscopic coronary artery bypass [endo-CAB]) at the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven.

Methods

The first 100 patients undergoing multivessel endo-CAB from May 2022 to March 2024 were included in this retrospective, single-center, observational study (N=100). The study encompassed both elective and urgent surgical revascularization. In all cases, endoscopic-assisted harvesting of the internal mammary artery, radial artery, or saphenous vein was performed, followed by beating-heart anastomoses through a mini-thoracotomy.

Results

A total of 226 distal anastomoses were performed, utilizing 102 left internal mammary arteries, 80 radial arteries, 30 right internal mammary arteries, and 14 saphenous veins. On average, each patient had 2.3 anastomoses. A Y graft configuration was employed in 78 patients, in-situ bilateral internal mammary artery inflow in 19 patients, and a proximal aortic graft in 3 patients. Four patients underwent concurrent arrhythmia surgery. Eleven patients received hybrid revascularization. There was 1 conversion to sternotomy (1%) and 3 instances where cardiopulmonary bypass was required (3%). The median operation time was 3.3 hours (interquartile range, 3.0-3.7 hours), and the median hospital stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 3-4 days). The in-hospital mortality rate was 1%.

Conclusion

Multivessel off-pump endo-CAB surgery can be safely performed with endoscopic-assisted conduit harvesting. Combining the benefits of a minimally invasive and anaortic approach may improve perioperative outcomes for patients requiring surgical revascularization. Further studies are necessary to establish the role of this technique in routine coronary surgery.

Geometric reconstruction of the left ventricle on a beating heart through a minimally invasive approach from the left anterolateral thoracotomy: case report

Despite the widespread use of mini-invasive treatment methods in cardiac surgery, their use in post-infarction myocardial aneurysms of the left ventricle is not of frequent occurrence. In this clinical case, we used left anterolateral thoracotomy and "eating heart" technique to correct the post-infarction left ventricle aneurysm with ventricular thrombosis using the Dor method in a 66-year-old patient. This technique created opportunity to perform safely and effective the planned reconstruction of the left ventricle with less trauma, as well as to ease the postoperative course and recovery of the patient, reduce hospitalization time.

Endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive versus sternotomy total arterial multivessel bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

This single-centre study compared the perioperative outcomes after total arterial multivessel revascularization through endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive surgery compared to a conventional sternotomy approach.

METHODS

In this retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study, a total of 740 patients were analysed [endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CAB), N = 92; Sternotomy, N = 648]. After PSM (1:2 ratio), 73 Endo-CAB and 137 sternotomy patients were compared with an equal number of distal anastomoses (Endo-CAB 2.3 versus Sternotomy 2.4 anastomoses per patient, P = 0.082). We used 'textbook outcome' as a patient-orientated outcome measure, defined as the absence of 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative ischaemia, cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular events, wound infection, new onset arrhythmias, pneumonia, placement of chest drains and prolonged hospital stay (>7 days).

RESULTS

Patients undergoing Endo-CAB had significantly more often a textbook outcome compared to the sternotomy group (78.1% vs 59.1%, P = 0.009). Endo-CAB patients had shorter hospital stay (4.0 vs 6.0 days, P < 0.001), less postoperative blood loss (360 vs 490 ml, P < 0.001) and a significant reduction of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (5.5% vs 17.5%, P = 0.015). Other postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Total arterial Endo-CAB demonstrates excellent postoperative outcomes compared to a sternotomy approach for multivessel coronary artery disease. These findings provide a strong basis for further expanding the multivessel Endo-CAB programme.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is the Future: Pro

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide. However, most CABG operations performed today are as invasive -apart from saphenous vein harvesting- as they were 50 years ago. While heart valve operations have become less invasive, CABG faces formidable challenges in doing so. Valve surgery requires a single surgical exposure to the valve intervened on, but less invasive CABG necessitates multiple surgical exposures to harvest internal thoracic artery conduits, source their inflow plus that of other grafts, and expose each coronary target to be grafted -including anterior, lateral, posterior, and inferior vessels. In this article, we rationalize why we believe that conventional CABG remains unduly invasive, associated with morbidity and prolonged recovery, and why less invasive CABG in its many forms, which we describe, represents a safe, practical, diffusible, and less invasive alternative to sternotomy CABG. Centers of excellence in coronary artery surgery should dedicate resources and expertise to developing high-quality, safe, durable, and advanced forms of lesser invasive CABG.

Total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy: Comparison of early- and mid-term results with conventional surgery

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) by comparing it to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with median sternotomy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 108 patients (95 males, 13 females; mean age: 57.1±8.8; range, 41 to 75 years) who underwent TCRAT (Group 1) and 154 patients (126 males, 28 females; mean age: 61.2±9.8; range, 31 to 79) who underwent conventional CABG (Group 2) between February 1, 2021, and September 1, 2022, were evaluated. The operations were performed by the same surgical team. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of patients and mid-term follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times, respectively, were 167.70±68.93 and 77.03±38.18 min in Group 1 and 106.64±38.27 and 62.21±24.06 min in Group 2 (p<0.001). During the postoperative period, the all-cause mortality rate was 5.8% (n=9) in Group 2, while it was 0.9% (n=1) in Group 1; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.037). Nevertheless, the mean preoperative EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) II was 2.59±2.3 in Group 2, which was significantly higher than the mean EuroSCORE II of Group 1 (1.37±1.5; p<0.001). The mean hospitalization duration for Group 2 was 6.99±3.37 days, and the mean hospitalization duration for Group 1 was 6.77±4.24 days. Duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly shorter in Group 1 (p=0.047). In addition, the mean perioperative number of erythrocyte suspension transfusions in Group 1 was 1.51±1.74, while it was 1.86±1.75 in Group 2. Significantly fewer erythrocyte suspension transfusions were performed in Group 1 (p=0.033).

Conclusion

The findings of our study indicate that TCRAT is a safe and viable technique when performed on a select patient group compared to the conventional method.

Long-term survival, cardiovascular, and functional outcomes after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in 566 patients

OBJECTIVE

Sternotomy has been the gold standard incision for surgical revascularization but may be associated with chronic pain and sternal malunion. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting allows for complete surgical revascularization through a small thoracotomy in selected patients. There is a paucity of long-term data, particularly functional outcomes, for patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Patients (N = 566) who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution over a 17-year period were prospectively followed. The primary outcome was survival. At late follow-up, patients were contacted for a questionnaire on functional outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model identified correlates of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up was complete for 100% of patients (mean 7.0 ± 4.4 years); a follow-up questionnaire was also completed for 83.9% (N = 427) of live patients. Fifty percent of patients (N = 283) had undergone multivessel grafting. At 12 years, survival for the entire cohort was 82.2% ± 2.6%. On late follow-up questionnaire, 12 patients (2.8%) had greater than Canadian Cardiovascular Score Class II angina and 19 patients (4.5%) had greater than New York Heart Association Class II symptoms. More than 98% of patients did not have pain related to the incision site. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified older age, peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, cancer in the past 5 years, intraoperative transfusion, and hybrid revascularization as correlates of mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe and durable alternative to sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients, with excellent short- and long-term outcomes, including for multivessel coronary disease. At long-term follow-up, the proportion of patients with significant symptoms and incisional pain was low.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an essential operation for patients who have severe coronary artery disease (CAD). Both open and minimally invasive CABG methods are used to treat CAD. This in-depth review looks at the latest research on the effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive CABG. The goal is to develop evidence-based guidelines that will improve surgical outcomes. This systematic review used databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science for a full electronic search. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and registered the results in the PROSPERO. The search method used MeSH phrases and many different study types to find papers. After removing duplicate publications and conducting a screening process, we collaboratively evaluated the full texts to determine their inclusion. We then extracted data, including diagnosis, the total number of patients in the study, clinical recommendations from the studies, surgical complications, angina recurrence, hospital stay duration, and mortality rates. Many studies that investigate open and minimally invasive CABG methods have shown that the type of surgery can have a large effect on how well the patient recovers and how well the surgery works overall. While there are limited data on the possible advantages of minimally invasive CABG, a conclusive comparison with open CABG is still dubious. Additional clinical trials are required to examine a wider spectrum of patient results.

Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

Introduction

The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery has been confirmed in numerous reports. However, minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has lower uptake and has not yet gained widespread adoption. The study aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of MICS CABG to MIDCAB in long-term follow-up for several clinical outcomes, including angina pectoris, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and overall survival.

Methods

This is an observational, retrospective, single center study of 1,149 patients who underwent either MIDCAB (n = 626) or MICS CABG (n = 523) at our institution between 2007 and 2018. The left internal thoracic artery and portions of the radial artery and saphenous vein were used for the patients' single-, double-, or triple-vessel revascularization procedures. We used gradient boosted propensity-score estimation to account for possible interactions between variables. After propensity-score adjustment, the two groups were similar in terms of preoperative demographics and risk profile. Long-term follow-up (mean 5.87, median 5.6 years) was available for 1,089 patients (94.8%).

Results

A total of 626, 454 and 69 patients underwent single, double and triple coronary revascularization, respectively. The long-term outcomes of freedom from angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization rate were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, there were 123 deaths in the MIDCAB group and 96 in the MICS CABG group. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 97%, 92%, 85%, and 69% for the MIDCAB group and 97%, 93%, 89%, and 74% for the MICS CABG group, respectively. The hazard ratio of overall survival for patients with two or more bypass grafts compared to those with one bypass graft was 1.190 (p-value = 0.234, 95% CI: 0.893-1.586). This indicates that there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. Furthermore, if we consider a hazard ratio of 1.2 to be clinically non-relevant, surgery with two or more grafts was significantly non-inferior to surgery with just one graft (p-value = 0.0057).

Conclusion

In experienced hands, MICS CABG is a safe and effective procedure. Survival and durability are comparable with MIDCAB.

Sternum-sparing multivessel coronary surgery as a routine procedure: Midterm results of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy

Objective

A sternum-sparing approach of minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy demonstrated promising early outcomes in unselected patients with coronary artery multivessel disease. Follow-up data are still missing.

Methods

From November 2019 to September 2023, coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic cardiac arrest was performed as a routine procedure in 392 consecutive, nonemergency patients (345 men; 67.0 ± 9.9 years; range, 32-88 years). All patients had multivessel coronary artery disease (77.6% 3-vessel-disease, 22.4% 2-vessel-disease, and 32.9% left main stenosis). Patients at old age (older than a 80 years, 12.5%), with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%, 7.9%), diabetes mellitus (34.9%), massive obesity (body mass index > 35, 8.9%), and chronic lung disease (17.1%) were included. Mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 2.9 ± 2.8. Mean midterm follow-up (100%) was 15.2 ± 10.7 months (range, 0.1-39.5 months).

Results

Left internal thoracic artery (99.0%), radial artery (70.4%), and saphenous vein grafts (57.4%) were used, and 70.4% of patients received at least 2 arterial grafts. A total of 3.0 ± 0.8 anastomoses (range, 2-5 anastomoses) per patient were performed to revascularize the territories of left anterior descending (98.7%), circumflex (91.6%), and right coronary (70.9%) artery. Complete anatomical revascularization was achieved in 95.1%. At follow-up, all-cause-mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke was 3.1%, 1.5%, 5.4%, and 0.7%, respectively. Overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate was 8.7%.

Conclusions

This is the first report of midterm follow-up after routine sternum-sparing total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy for multivessel coronary artery disease with a high rate of multiple arterial grafting and complete anatomical revascularization. Outcome was favorable and similar to that of contemporary conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Low-Risk Asian Cohort: A Propensity-Score Matched Study

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) offers a new paradigm in coronary revascularization. This study aims to compare the outcomes of MICS CABG with those of conventional median sternotomy CABG (MS CABG) within a growing minimally invasive cardiac surgical program in Singapore.

METHODS

Propensity matching produced 111 patient pairs who underwent MICS CABG or MS CABG between January 2009 and February 2020 at the National University Heart Centre, Singapore. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery patients were matched to single- or double-graft MS CABG patients (Group 1). Multivessel MICS CABG patients were matched to MS CABG patients with equal number of grafts (Group 2).

RESULTS

Overall, MICS CABG patients experienced shorter postoperative length of stay (P<0.071). In Group 2, procedural duration (P<0.001) was longer among MICS CABG patients, but it did not translate to adverse postoperative events. Postoperative outcomes, including 30-day mortality, reopening for bleeding, new onset atrial fibrillation as well as neurological, pulmonary, renal, and infectious complications were comparable between MICS and MS CABG groups.

CONCLUSION

MICS CABG is a safe and effective approach for surgical revascularization of coronary artery disease and trends toward a reduction in hospital stay.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review of all available evidence on the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify all relevant studies evaluating outcomes of MICS CABG among patients with multivessel CAD and including at least 15 patients with no restriction on the publication date.

RESULTS

A total of 881 studies were identified, of which 26 studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 7,556 patients. The average patient age was 63.3 years (range 49.5 to 69.0 years), male patients were an average of 77.8% (54.0% to 89.8%), and body mass index was 29.8 kg/m2 (24.5 to 30.1 kg/m2). Early mortality and stroke were on average 0.6% (range 0% to 2.0%) and 0.4% (range 0% to 1.3%), respectively. The average number of grafts was 2.8 (range 2.1 to 3.7). The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days (range 3.1 to 9.3 days).

CONCLUSIONS

MICS CABG appears to be a safe method in well-selected patients with multivessel CAD. This approach is concentrated at dedicated centers, and there is no widespread application, although it has potential to be widely applicable as an alternative for surgical revascularization. However, large randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up are still required to compare the outcomes with conventional CABG and other revascularization strategies.

The Best Second Arterial Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Data

Multiple arterial conduit revascularization in coronary bypass surgery is being advocated over the use of venous conduits. However, there is a critical gap regarding the optimal sequence of arterial conduit selection following the left internal thoracic artery. This study is the first individual patient data meta-analysis, which aimed to compare the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) versus the radial artery (RA) as a second-best arterial conduit. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL. A forward-backward citation check was performed to identify other relevant studies. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023455543). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched cohort studies reporting long-term outcomes (>3 years) after coronary bypass surgery using the RITA versus RA as the second arterial conduit after left internal thoracic artery. Overall, long-term survival between the RITA and RA groups showed no significant difference. Landmark analyses demonstrated the superiority of RITA as a second arterial conduit at 1 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99), P = 0.036], 2 [0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.96), P = 0.011], and 5 years [HR: 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95), P = 0.036] post-surgery. Freedom from major cardiovascular events was significantly higher using the RITA conduit [HR: 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.89), P = 0.002]. This study supports the use of RITA, especially when used in a skeletonized in situ fashion, as a second choice following the left internal thoracic artery as it has the potential to enhance long-term survival and outcomes. Further research with standardized surgical techniques is warranted.

Comparison of clinical effects of coronary artery bypass grafting between left anterior small thoracotomy approach and lower-end sternal splitting approach

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between the left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST) and lower-end sternal splitting (LESS) approaches for coronary artery disease.

METHODS

In total, 110 patients who underwent LAST from October 2015 to December 2020 in Tianjin Chest Hospital were selected as the observation group. Patients who underwent the LESS approach during the same period were analyzed. The propensity score was calculated by a logistic regression model, and nearest-neighbor matching was used for 1:1 matching.

RESULTS

The length of hospital stay and ventilator support time were significantly shorter in the LAST than LESS group. The target vessels in the obtuse marginal branch and posterior left ventricular artery branch grafts were significantly more numerous in the LAST than LESS group, but those in the right coronary artery graft were significantly less numerous in the LAST group.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG using either the LAST or LESS approach is safe and effective, especially in low-risk patients. The LAST approach can achieve complete revascularization for multivessel lesions and has the advantages of less trauma and an aesthetic outcome. However, it requires a certain learning curve to master the surgical techniques and has specific surgical indications.

Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is and continues to be the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease. Graft selection has been shown to influence the outcomes following CABG. During the last almost 60 years saphenous vein grafts (SVG) together with the internal mammary artery have become the standard of care for patients undergoing CABG surgery. While there is little doubt about the benefits, the patency rates are constantly under debate. Despite its acknowledged limitations in terms of long-term patency due to intimal hyperplasia, the saphenous vein is still the most often used graft. Although reendothelialization occurs early postoperatively, the process of intimal hyperplasia remains irreversible. This is due in part to the persistence of high shear forces, the chronic localized inflammatory response, and the partial dysfunctionality of the regenerated endothelium. "No-Touch" harvesting techniques, specific storage solutions, pressure controlled graft flushing and external stenting are important and established methods aiming to overcome the process of intimal hyperplasia at different time levels. Still despite the known evidence these methods are not standard everywhere. The use of arterial grafts is another strategy to address the inferior SVG patency rates and to perform CABG with total arterial revascularization. Composite grafting, pharmacological agents as well as latest minimal invasive techniques aim in the same direction. To give guide and set standards all graft related topics for CABG are presented in this expert opinion document on graft treatment.

Thirteen Years of Impactful, Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery: Short- and Long-Term Results for Single and Multi-Vessel Disease

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) via lateral thoracotomy is a less invasive alternative to the traditional median full sternotomy approach for coronary surgery. This study investigates its effectiveness for short- and long-term revascularization in cases of single and multi-vessel diseases.

METHODS

A thorough examination was performed on the databases of two cardiac surgery programs, focusing on patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting procedures between 2010 and 2023. The study involved patients who underwent either minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) for the revascularization of left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis or minimally invasive multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICSCABG). Our assessment criteria included in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and freedom from reoperations due to failed aortocoronary bypass grafts post-surgery. Additionally, we evaluated significant in-hospital complications as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 315 consecutive patients were identified between 2010 and 2023 (MIDCAB 271 vs. MICSCABG 44). Conversion to median sternotomy (MS) occurred in eight patients (2.5%). The 30-day all-cause mortality was 1.3% (n = 4). Postoperative AF was the most common complication postoperatively (n = 26, 8.5%). Five patients were reoperated for bleeding (1.6%), and myocardial infarction (MI) happened in four patients (1.3%). The mean follow-up time was six years (±4 years). All-cause mortality was 10.3% (n = 30), with only five (1.7%) patients having a confirmed cardiac cause. The reoperation rate due to graft failure or the progression of aortocoronary disease was 1.4% (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the complexity of the MICS approach, the results of our study support the safety and effectiveness of this procedure with low rates of mortality, morbidity, and conversion for both single and multi-vessel bypass surgeries. These results underscore further the necessity to implement such programs to benefit patients.

[Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term clinical efficacy of MICS CABG compared to surgery through sternotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 158 patients who underwent minimally invasive CABG through left-sided mini-thoracotomy between 2017 and 2023. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and 5-year survival, secondary endpoint - freedom from adverse cardiac events. The control group enrolled 150 patients who underwent median sternotomy.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 3.1±1.9 years. There were no differences in 5-year freedom from adverse cardiac events (84.7% versus 81.6%, p>0.05). Long-term survival (after 5 years) was 99% and 95%, respectively (p>0.05). In our study, the risk rate of wound complications after MICS CABG was 3 times lower compared to surgeries through sternotomy. Naturally, this reduces postoperative hospital-stay, promotes faster recovery and shortens the rehabilitation period. No significant differences in the quality of life after minimally invasive and traditional CABG indicates that MICS CABG does not reduce the effectiveness of myocardial revascularization. Thus, MICS CABG is not only characterized by low surgical risk, but also able to provide stable long-term results.

CONCLUSION

MICS CABG is a safe and effective surgery. This surgery is not inferior to standard CABG through median sternotomy regarding long-term results, quality of life and life expectancy. However, this approach has advantages in patients with high risk of postoperative sternal wound complications. It also reduces the rehabilitation period and promotes early return to everyday life.

Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained a significant place due to the emergence of innovative tools and improvements in surgical techniques, offering comparable efficacy and safety to traditional surgical methods. This review provides an overview of the history of MICS, its current state, and its prospects and highlights its advantages and limitations. Additionally, we highlight the growing trends and potential pathways for the expansion of MICS, underscoring the crucial role of technological advancements in shaping the future of this field. Recognizing the challenges, we strive to pave the way for further breakthroughs in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

Comparing perioperative outcomes following off-pump multi-vessel minimally invasive via a single left intercostal space incision with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: A single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The perioperative outcomes following off-pump multi-vessel minimally invasive surgery (MICS) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via a single left intercostal space incision has not been well evaluated.

METHOD

From July 2019 to January 2022, a total of 444 patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled and divided into MICS (n = 179) and sternotomy CABG (n = 265). Perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups, including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first 24 h drainage, ventilation duration, length of stay (LOS) in ICU and total LOS in hospital. Intraoperative blood flow of graft vessels were measured by transit-time flow measurement after vascular anastomosis and mean flow (MF) and pulsatile index (PI) were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative profiles between these two groups except younger and lower proportion of female in MICS. No significant difference in the number of graft vessels was observed between MICS (3.18 ± 0.74) and sternotomy CABG (3.28 ± 0.86). Compared to sternotomy CABG, patients with MICS showed longer operation duration [(4.33 ± 0.86) h versus (5.10 ± 1.09) h], fewer intraoperative blood loss [700 (600, 900) mL versus 500 (200, 700) mL], fewer postoperative first 24 h drainage [400 (250, 500) mL versus 300 (200, 400) mL], shorter postoperative ventilation duration [16.5 (12.5, 19.0) h versus 15.0 (12.0, 17.0) h], LOS in ICU [20.0 (16.0, 23.0) h versus 18.0 (15.0, 20.0) h] and total LOS in hospital [(14.5 ± 3.9) d versus (12.6 ± 2.7) d] (all p < .001). MI and PI of graft vessels were similar and no significant differences in major perioperative complications and mortality were observed between MICS and sternotomy CABG (all p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Off-pump multi-vessel MICS may be an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel CAD with better perioperative outcomes than sternotomy CABG.

Effect of different coronary artery revascularization procedures on cognition: A systematic review

Coronary revascularization interventions have been associated with post-intervention cognitive decline. Hence, this systematic review aims to compare the long-term effects of different coronary revascularization interventions on cognition. The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles published between January 2009 and January 2023. Articles on clinical trials and cohort studies that compared at least two different interventions with a minimum three months follow up were included to evaluate the consequences of different intervention techniques on cognition. Each selected study was evaluated using a revised tool to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2), and Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions(ROBINS-1) was used for evaluating non-randomized studies. Five eligible studies, with four different comparisons, were included. Out of these studies, three RCTs and two cohort studies were included A participants gone through different procedures; on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB), the miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) and endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CABG). These comparisons showed that different interventions have different effects on cognition; however, there is no solid evidence of correlations between them. Thus, the results of this review suggest that there should be greater focus on comparing interventions and that a reasonable follow-up duration should be set to avoid the influence of confounders. There is also a need to determine the effect of long-term cognitive decline while reducing interference by other variables.

The Feasibility and Early Results of Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for All Comers

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular surgery advancements have emerged with various minimally invasive approaches for treating multivessel coronary disease to improve outcomes and minimize the burden associated with conventional cardiac surgery. We present our clinical experience and minimally invasive coronary bypass techniques through minithoracotomy, which we apply without selection to patients who have decided to have elective surgery for multivessel isolated coronary artery disease.

METHODS

It consists of 230 consecutive patients operated by the same team with this method between July 2020 and September 2022. The patients were assigned to one of the two methods preoperatively to their accompanying comorbidities and operated on either with blood cardioplegia via 5 to 7 cm left anterior minithoracotomy, with on-pump clamped technique or without pump via left anterolateral minithoracotomy.

RESULTS

Mortality was observed in two of our patients (0.9%), but myocardial infarction was not observed in our patients in the early postoperative period. None of our patients required conversion to sternotomy (0%). Five patients' needed reoperation from the same incision due to postoperative bleeding (2.2%), and atrial fibrillation developed in 17 patients in the postoperative period (7.4%). The mean number of bypasses was found to be 3.0 ± 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery via minithoracotomy can be routinely reproduced safely. More long-term results and more multicenter studies are needed for more widespread acceptance of the technique.

Left anterior minithoracotomy as a first-choice approach for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and selective combined procedures

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to describe the technique for and evaluate the results of the isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or combined grafting procedures with mitral valve repair/replacement and/or left ventricle aneurysm repair performed through a single left anterior minithoracotomy.

METHODS

Perioperative data of all patients who required isolated or combined coronary grafting from July 2017 to December 2021 were observed. The focus was on 560 patients who underwent isolated or combined multivessel coronary bypass using the "Total Coronary Revascularization via left Anterior Thoracotomy" technique. The main perioperative outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

A left anterior minithoracotomy was used in 521 (97.7%) out of 533 patients who required isolated multivessel surgical coronary revascularization and in 39 (32.5%) out of 120 patients who required combined procedures. In 39 patients, multivessel grafting was combined with 25 mitral valve and 22 left ventricular procedures. Mitral valve repair was performed through the aneurysm (n = 8) or through the interatrial septum (n = 17). Perioperative outcomes in isolated and combined groups were next: aortic cross-clamp time-71.9 (SD: 19.9) and 120 (SD: 25.8) min; cardiopulmonary bypass time-145.7 (SD: 33.5) and 216 (SD: 45.8) min; total operating time-269 (SD: 51.8) and 324 (SD: 52.1) min; intensive care unit stay-2 (2-2) and 2 (2-2) days; total hospital stay-6 (5-7) and 6 (5-7) days; and total 30-day mortality was 0.54 and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A left anterior minithoracotomy can be effectively used as a first-choice approach to perform isolated multivessel coronary grafting and can be combined with mitral valve and/or left ventricular repair. Experience with isolated coronary grafting through an anterior minithoracotomy is required to achieve the satisfactory results in combined procedures.

Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future

Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms-namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated.

[Surgical Revascularization of the Myocardium by Minimally Invasive Access]

Median sternotomy is the Gold Standard access for surgical revascularization of the myocardium, but it is not free of complications, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Minimally invasive access offers the advantage of avoiding sternotomy, achieving a more accelerated postoperative recovery, with less hospital stay time and a higher level of satisfaction with quality of life. We present the case of a 49-year-old male patient, diabetic, hypertensive, smoker, with multiarterial coronary artery disease, very symptomatic, who underwent surgical revascularization by left mini-thoracotomy.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Patient With Chronic Tracheostoma: Alternative to Reduce Sternal Wound Complication Risk

Patients with chronic tracheostoma present a challenge when they require coronary bypass surgery due to an elevated risk of sternal wound infections (SWI). Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) is a robust technique that allows complete surgical revascularization while mitigating the risks of sternal complications and functional decline associated with sternotomy. In such patients at elevated risk for SWI, MICS CABG may represent a viable revascularization strategy to avoid sternotomy. Here, we present a case of a frail, comorbid patient with a chronic tracheostomy and symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease not amenable to percutaneous therapy referred for MICS CABG.

Combination of endoscopic internal thoracic artery harvest and proximal anastomoses on the descending aorta in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is less invasive. Proximal anastomoses at the ascending aorta, in contrast, are technically difficult to perform because of the limited field of view. A man in his 60s undergoing haemodialysis required minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for left anterior descending artery and circumflex arterial restenosis. We successfully performed minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with a proximal graft anastomosis of the descending aorta. A thoracotomy was performed to extend the lateral approach to the descending aorta. We performed a minithoracotomy using three-dimensional endoscopy for internal thoracic artery harvesting. Endoscopic internal thoracic artery harvesting minimises incision length. The combination of endoscopic and lateral thoracotomy incisions in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting enabled small and lateral thoracotomy incisions.

Intraoperative spontaneous tension pneumothorax during robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting

Patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting are increasing. Several complications have emerged with the increasing use of minimally invasive procedures. We reported a case of spontaneous tension pneumothorax that developed in the ventilated lung during robotic assisted left internal mammary artery harvesting causing severe hemodynamic instability. A sudden rise of airway pressure occurred, and the patient became hypotensive. Immediately, the surgeon was notified to look at the right pleura. Pneumothorax was identified, the right pleura was opened using robotic arms, and the right lung was decompressed. A small emphysematous bulla was identified and stabled. Proper identification of the procedure-associated complications is essential for timely management. Tension pneumothorax is a potentially fatal complication, especially in patients under positive pressure ventilation.

Minimally invasive off-pump anaortic coronary artery bypass (MACAB)

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass has enabled coronary artery bypass graft to compete with the appeal of less invasive percutaneous coronary procedures. Favorable results of coronary artery bypass surgery performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and without touching the aorta (anOPCAB) have enabled the development and use of minimally invasive methods.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2021, 112 patients underwent multivessel coronary bypass surgery performed using a minimally invasive method through a small thoracotomy in the left chest with off-pump, anaortic, and all-arterial grafts (Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Anaortic Coronary Artery Bypass [MACAB]). Patient data were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Eight series from the literature using the multivessel mini-OPCAB and MACAB technique were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Collectively, from the literature, 2729 patients underwent an average of 2.4 bypasses with an early mortality rate of 0.7% and a stroke rate of 0.16%. In our MACAB case series, 112 patients underwent an average of 2.9 bypasses with a mortality rate of 1.8% and a stroke rate of 0%.

CONCLUSION

MACAB can be performed safely by experienced surgeons and reduces neurological injury and surgical trauma and may be a good alternative for multivessel stenting. Simulation systems are essential for its dissemination, and teams dedicated to coronary surgery-with subspecialty expertise-are necessary to achieve good outcomes.

A Single Center Initial Experience with Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (RA-MIDCAB)

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive procedures have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing the recovery times while ensuring optimal results and minimizing complications. Regarding the coronary artery surgical revascularization field, the evolution of techniques and technology is permitting new surgical strategies that are increasingly precise and suitable for each patient. We present an initial single center experience with a case series of patients successfully treated with combined robotic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft (MIDCAB) for the anastomosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization with the use of two combined techniques at our Institution between January 2021 and October 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with the described approach. The median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 83 min (76-115) and 38 min (32-58), respectively. The median intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were 2 days (1-4) and 8 days (6-11), respectively. The procedure's success was achieved in 100% of patients. The 30-day mortality was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all the limitations related to the small sample, the presented results of a hybrid approach for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) appears to be encouraging and acceptable. The main advantage of this approach is related to the reduction of postoperative pain and pulmonary complications.

Repeat Revascularization Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Traditional Sternotomy Techniques in 1468 Cases

Background: Traditional open sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) utilizes highly invasive techniques that lead to several serious complications. In response, minimally invasive cardiac surgery CABG (MICS-CABG) was developed. MICS-CABG is safe, reproducible, and with fewer complications, while allowing for better postoperative recovery periods. There is a paucity of data exploring rates of repeat revascularization in patients post MICS-CABG compared to post traditional sternotomy CABG.

Methods: This was a retrospective billing database review examining 1468 CABG patients at a large university medical center from January 2005 to December 2017. The primary objective was to compare the rate of repeat revascularization events between MICS-CABG and traditional open sternotomy CABG over an eight-year follow-up period.

Results: Our study population consisted of 1468 patients, of whom 513 had MICS-CABG and 955 had traditional CABG. The number of patients undergoing repeat revascularization within the eight-year surveillance was 99 for MICS-CABG and 75 for traditional CABG. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates for eight years were 0.86 for MICS-CABG and 0.91 for traditional CABG. The mean time until a repeat revascularization event was 84.1 months for MICS-CABG and 88.5 months for traditional CABG.

Conclusions: Traditional CABG was found to have a statistically significantly longer time to repeat revascularization than MICS-CABG. Despite the technical challenges associated with MICS-CABG, the time to repeat revascularization was different by only about four months, which may not hold large clinical significance. This suggests that MICS-CABG may have a role to play due to previous findings showing a reduction in complications while allowing for better postoperative recovery periods.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Ultrasonically Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery

Objective

This study aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery in the authors’ initial experience.

Methods

From February 2012 to May 2021, 247 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery were reviewed retrospectively. Internal thoracic arteries were harvested in a full skeletonized fashion using an ultrasonic scalpel via left minithoracotomy. Bilateral internal thoracic arteries were used in 108 patients, and the internal thoracic arteries as in situ grafts were used in 393 anastomoses. Total arterial revascularization was performed in 126 patients, and 142 patients underwent aortic nontouch minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

Results

The patients’ mean (range) age was 65.9 ± 11.5 (30-90) years. The mean (range) number of anastomoses performed was 2.6 ± 1.1 (1-6). Forty-six patients (18.6%) had 4 grafts, 94 patients (38.1%) had 3 grafts, and 60 patients (24.3%) had 2 grafts. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting was completed without conversion to sternotomy in all patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 3 patients (1.2%), reinterventions due to bleeding were performed in 7 patients (2.8%), and chest wound infections were observed in 5 patients (2.0%). There was 1 (0.4%) mortality.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery is feasible and has shown good perioperative outcomes. This approach has the potential for further optimization with revascularization strategies.

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of triple vessel coronary artery disease with coexisting coronary artery fistula

Coexistence of triple vessel coronary artery disease with coronary-pulmonary artery fistula is extremely rare. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery in the treatment of such coexisting disease is so far not reported. This case report emphasizes the feasibility of performing complete revascularization of the coronaries with coronary artery fistula ligation through a minimally invasive anterior thoracotomy, obviating full sternotomy.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass after percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) with the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) provides excellent long-term results for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) disease. We tried to evaluate the impact of the previous percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) for LAD on the clinical outcomes of MIDCAB in this study.

METHODS

A total of 197 patients with isolated LAD disease underwent MIDCAB in our center from February 2009 to May 2020. 51 patients had the p-PCI for LAD and 146 patients did not. The primary outcome was the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).

RESULTS

The incidences of the perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups (p > .05). The median follow-up time was 48.0 months (interquartile range, 25.9-85.5 months). The incidences of MACE (p < .001) and myocardial infarction or recurrent angina (p < .001) were significantly higher in the p-PCI group than those in the non-PCI group. The estimated 5-year freedom from MACE in the p-PCI group was significantly lower (56.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.2%-71.0% vs. 83.4%, 95% CI: 76.7%-90.1%, p < .001). The previous LAD-PCI (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.664, 95% CI: 1.471-4.822, p = .001) and the history of peripheral arterial disease (HR: 3.145, 95% CI: 1.085-9.113, p = .035) were the independent predictors of MACE. The p-PCI group had a higher diseased graft rate than the non-PCI group (10.9% vs. 2.3%, p = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

The previous LAD-PCI may deteriorate the outcomes of MIDCAB in patients with isolated LAD disease.

Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Objectives

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but there are certain surgical challenges inherent in the adoption of this approach. The present study was conducted to provide insight regarding the outcomes associated with our first 118 cases, to discuss the surgical difficulties encountered in these patients, and to outline the potential countermeasures.

Methods

Between January 2017 and January 2020, 118 patients underwent multi-vessel MICS CABG. These patients were stratified into two groups based upon whether they did or did not experience surgical challenges, and early clinical outcomes were compared between these groups to assess the incidence of technical difficulties and associated factors.

Results

Surgical challenges arose in 38 of the 118 cases in this study, including 13 cases of exposure-related difficulties, 11 cases of proximal anastomosis-related difficulties, 15 cases of distal anastomosis-related difficulties, 4 cases of LITA-related difficulties, and 3 cases of lung-related difficulties. Relative to the other 80 patients, those patients for whom intraoperative technical challenges arose experience significant increases in operative duration (4.94 ± 0.89 vs. 5.59 ± 1.11 h, P=0.001), intraoperative blood loss (667 ± 313 vs. 892 ± 532 mL, P=0.005), length of the ICU admission (17.59 ± 3.51 vs. 22.59 ± 17.31 h, P=0.015), and the duration of postoperative hospitalization (5.96 ± 1.23 vs. 6.71 ± 1.92 days, P=0.012). There were no significant differences between these groups with respect to the mean graft number, major complications such as stroke or organ dysfunction, or one-year graft patency.

Conclusions

There is a substantial learning curve associated with performing off-pump MICS CABG to treat multi-vessel disease. Surgical challenges encountered during this procedure may increase the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, ICU admission, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization. However, these issues do not appear to compromise the efficacy of complete revascularization, and early clinical outcomes associated with this procedure remain acceptable.

Less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: now is the time

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting techniques have seen a progressive evolution over the last two decades. In their current state, they are easily reproduced and applicable to most patients requiring multivessel revascularization. The purpose of this review is to highlight their importance among a spectrum of evolving therapies and the accruing evidence in their favour.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first large dual center experience with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) demonstrated the feasibility of performing multivessel surgical revascularization without the need for sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass. Subsequent angiographic studies to assess graft patency showed excellent early results. Studies comparing MICS CABG to conventional CABG demonstrate faster recovery while reducing hospitalization and cost.

SUMMARY

Multivessel less invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is basically limited to two procedures, MICS CABG and robotically assisted totally endoscopic CABG (TECAB). MICS CABG has evolved as a procedure that preserves the safety and efficacy of conventional CABG while avoiding the associated morbidity. It is reproducible, versatile and holds promise as the procedure of choice for multivessel coronary revascularization in the future. TECAB is likely the pinnacle of minimally invasive coronary surgery, the growth of which is hindered by widespread acceptance and industry involvement.

Coronary computed tomography angiography following robotic coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: Systematic approach to image analysis and practical considerations

Standard open chest Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) has evolved over last couple of decades. With advancement in minimally invasive procedures, Robotic CABG (RCABG) is still in its evolution phase. There is dearth of experienced surgeons in this complicated field and lack of data to verify it clinical safety. in this review, we intend to describe the utility of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) in assessment of graft anatomy and quality, grafting strategy, distal graft anastomosis site evaluation and detection of complications associated with RCABG. CCTA appears to provide valuable information regarding the visualization of grafts, target coronary arteries and other cardiac and non-cardiac structures.