The Effects of Public Access Defibrillation on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Bystander availability, CPR uptake, and AED use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation of a shockable rhythm improve survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Little data exists on bystander participation during genuine cardiac arrest calls.

Method

This was a prospective audit of bystander participation during OHCA calls to a single ambulance service in the United Kingdom. A convenience sample of consecutive OHCA calls from March 2022 until April 2023, where an adult cardiac arrest was confirmed and CPR was advised, was audited by a call handler. Cases with a valid do not attempt CPR decision were excluded. Data on key time intervals and bystander participation were extracted and analysed in R (v4.2).

Results

In total, 451 cases were analysed. Median time until cardiac arrest recognition was 42 s (IQR 94.7 s) and until the initiation of CPR was 161 s (IQR 124 s). A lone bystander was present in 162 (35.9%) cases, two bystanders in 149 (33.0%) cases, and three or more bystanders in 140 (31.0%) cases. CPR was attempted by a bystander in 382 (84.7%) cases. Physical inability, refusal, and inability to correctly position patient were common reasons for not performing CPR. A defibrillator was retrieved before the arrival of emergency medical services in 36 (8%) cases and a shock was administered in 9 (2%) cases, while a shock was not advised in 20 (4%) further cases.

Conclusion

Cardiac arrest was identified rapidly but there was a delay to initiation of CPR. A lone bystander was present in over one third of cases, eliminating the possibility of bystander defibrillation in the absence of a lay first responder.

No One Left Behind: Incidence of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and 30-Day Survival in Military Members

OBJECTIVES

Military service requires intense exercise, increasing the risk of sudden cardiac arrest, which is typically fatal without bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) combined with immediate defibrillation. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates average 10%. The US military emphasizes team responsibility for providing immediate rescue to individual members. Data suggest that CPR and bystander defibrillation rates are higher on military bases than off bases. We hypothesized that sudden cardiac arrest rates would be greater in the military, but survival posthospitalization would be better than in civilian cohorts.

METHODS

The Military Health System Data Repository was queried from fiscal years 2016-2019 for the diagnoses of cardiac arrest, torsades de pointes, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular flutter in a cross-sectional study of actively serving U.S. military members ages 17-64 years.

RESULTS

A total of 958 military personnel were identified with sudden cardiac arrest/ventricular arrhythmia from fiscal years 2016 to 2019 with a sudden cardiac arrest rate of 10.8 per 100,000 person-years. Thirty-day survival rates were high at 73% for subjects aged <35 and 76% for those aged 35-64 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high incidence of sudden cardiac arrest in the military, survival beyond 30 days for those transported to the hospital was excellent. While greater efforts toward preventing sudden cardiac arrest in the military are indicated, these data suggest that increased rates of bystander CPR and defibrillation result in meaningful gains in survival.

Advances in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A clinical review

Despite considerable advances in the management, the prognosis of patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains poor. To standardize clinical practice patterns and to improve outcomes, the guidelines provide scientific statements. It is challenging to develop and establish novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in randomized controlled trials in patients with OHCA. Nonetheless, important randomized data have been recently published in the field of resuscitation science. This review article provides an overview of updates on OHCA and resuscitation, focusing on key topics since 2020.

Seasonal variation in bystander efforts and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

This study investigated the hypothesis that out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence, public automated external defibrillator (PAD) utilization and outcome vary by season, with increased incidence and lower survival rates expected in winter. The aim was to provide insights that might optimize resuscitation efforts throughout the year.

Methods

Cases of OHCA from 2016 to 2021 were included from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Cases were stratified by season and month and analysed for frequency, witnessed status, location, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander PAD defibrillation and 30-day survival. The primary outcome was incidence of OHCA and variability in utilization of PADs by season. Secondary outcome was 30-day survival rates. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square and multivariable analyses were conducted using Poisson regression.

Results

A total of 25,248 OHCA cases were included with a median age of 74 years [IQR 63-82] and 64% were male. Multivariable analyses revealed a lower incident rate ratio (IRR) of OHCA for most months (IRR 0.78 to 0.92 with 95%CI 0.72-0.98, all p-values < 0.05), except March and December, using January as reference. Seasonal rates of bystander CPR (78.4%-79.4%, p = 0.414) and PAD shock (8.9%-9.8%, p = 0.266) remained consistent throughout the year. The proportion of residential OHCAs were higher during winter than in summer (79.4% vs 77.5%, respectively, p = 0.023). Crude 30-day survival rates showed significant seasonal variation with lower survival rates during winter (11.1%) compared to spring (12.4%), summer (13.4%) and fall (12.2%, p = 0.001). However, after adjusting for factors such as sex, comorbidities, and OHCA circumstances (witnessed status, bystander CPR, PAD shock), no significant seasonal variation in survival remained (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Incidence of OHCA was higher in winter, but rates of bystander CPR and PAD shock remained consistent across seasons. Crude mortality rates were significantly lower during winter. However, multivariable regression analysis revealed no significant variation in survival rates by month.

How stepwise interventions in pre-hospital emergency care enhance out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management in a Megacity in China

OBJECTIVE

A series of improvements have been formulated and implemented to prompt the inadequate pre-hospital care capacity for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) management in China. The aim of this study is to investigate the combined association of those stepwise interventions with OHCA management in Shenzhen, as a representative city in China.

METHODS

This registry-based retrospective study included emergency medical services (EMS)-treated adult OHCA patients with presumed cardiac etiology in Shenzhen, China, covering the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2022. During this period, three key interventions were implemented sequentially: a public access defibrillation (PAD) program on October 1, 2017, a civilian cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training program on July 1, 2020, and telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) on November 23, 2021. The outcomes of bystander CPR and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were compared with pre-intervention controls.

RESULTS

A total of 6,571 EMS-treated presumed cardiac etiology adult OHCA patients were included, among which were 623 cases with bystander-witnessed OHCA and a shockable rhythm. Across four periods, the rates of both bystander CPR (8.55 vs. 12.60 vs. 18.31 vs. 23.10%) and ROSC (6.01 vs. 5.29 vs. 9.59 vs. 8.33%) showed an increasing trend. For the rate of bystander CPR, the likelihood was significantly increased after implementation of the PAD program (OR 1.64 [95% CI 1.21-2.23]) and civilian CPR training program (OR 2.12 [95% CI: 1.52-2.95]), and after the addition of the T-CPR application (OR 3.06 [95% CI: 2.14-4.39]), compared with the pre-period. Similarly, cumulative interventions were associated with a higher ROSC (OR 0.84 [95% CI: 0.62-1.14], OR 1.52 [95% CI: 1.07-1.89], OR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.07-1.89]) when compared with the pre-period. In subgroup analysis, cumulative interventions significantly improved the rate of bystander CPR in cases where OHCA occurred in public locations, and ROSC in cases where the time from symptom onset to calling 120 was within 10 min.

CONCLUSION

Stepwise interventions in pre-hospital emergency care increased likelihood of bystander CPR and ROSC following pre-hospital resuscitation significantly. This improvement is attributed to the coordination and cumulative effect of multiple positive interventions for OHCA management.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A 10-year analysis of survival and neurological outcomes

Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health issue with low survival rates. Objective Identification of predictors for survival and good neurological outcomes following OHCA. Methods This retrospective study included all OHCA patients between January 2014 and December 2023. Data was collected from the local resuscitation registry and hospital electronic medical records. Neurological outcomes were measured using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale. Results At hospital admission return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 36 % of cases (411/1128), with overall survival rates of 29 % (328/1128) at 24 h and 16 % (178/1128) at 30 days, respectively. Good neurological outcomes (CPC 1 and 2) were observed in 13 % (144/1128) of patients. The main suspected cause of cardiac arrest was cardiac origin (54 %, 608/1128), followed by hypoxia (11 %, 127/1128). Survivors were significantly younger (60 vs 71 years, p < 0.001), were less disabled (p < 0.001), had a higher incidence of witnessed cardiac arrest (80 % vs 69 %, p = 0.018), received more often bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, 62 % vs 47 %, p = 0.003) or Dispatcher Assisted-CPR (44 % vs 32 %, p = 0.004). Moreover, patients who survived at least 30 days had a higher incidence of shockable initial rhythm (57 % vs 24 %, p < 0.001). Conclusions Patients who survived at least 30 days were younger and male, had less disability, a shockable initial rhythm, and a cardiac arrest in public.

Defining the terminology of first responders alerted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by medical dispatch centres: An international consensus study on nomenclature

Aim

Emergency medical services target to reduce time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation by alerting additional individuals to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Multiple terms are used to describe these individuals, potentially causing confusion and hindering comparisons. This international consensus study aimed to establish standardised terminology.

Methods

Forty-six interdisciplinary researchers from four continents participated in a symposium on "Community First Responders" with the objective of standardising relevant terminology. Initially, terms were proposed anonymously for individuals alerted during work hours and those alerted during leisure time. Each term was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Terms receiving a high level of agreement were included in the final voting process.

Results

Seven terms were suggested for individuals alerted during work hours. In the first voting "first responder", "professional first responder", and "on-duty first responder" achieved high agreement. Ultimately, consensus was reached on the term "on-duty first responder".For individuals alerted during leisure time, ten terms were proposed. Among these, "first responder", "citizen first responder", "community emergency responder", "community first responder", "volunteer first responder", "volunteer responder", and "volunteer community first responder" reached high agreement. In the final vote "community first responder" was selected.The consensus group agreed that the overarching term "first responder" should be used to describe all community-based individuals, who are alerted, regardless of whether they are on duty or off duty.

Conclusion

This consensus study recommends using the terms "on-duty first responder" and "community first responder" to describe individuals additionally alerted by medical dispatch centres to facilitate early intervention in OHCA.

Removal of bra for pad placement and defibrillation - A scoping review

Background

In some regions, females are less likely to receive public-initiated resuscitation, potentially due to the need to expose the chest and breasts for proper automated external defibrillator (AED) pad placement. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the breadth of the existing literature and knowledge gaps on bra (brassière) removal and AED pad application.

Methods

Studies that examined bra removal and outcomes associated with AED pad placement and defibrillation in cardiac arrest were eligible. We searched three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) from inception to September 26, 2024. Google and Google Scholar (first 20 pages) were searched for grey literature on October 1, 2024. The study followed the scoping review framework by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results

The search identified 287 references. Three studies met the eligibility criteria, including one animal and two manikin studies, of which two were conference abstracts. No studies examined patient outcomes. No adverse events were reported with defibrillation in a pig model with AED pads in direct contact with a bra's underwire. No difference in time to pad placement or shock delivery was seen with bra removal in simulation. One simulation study reported female manikins were less likely to be completely de-robed, including bra removal, which was attributed to social norms, modesty, and lack of awareness.

Conclusion

Scant evidence is available on the need for bra removal and outcomes associated with AED application. Further research is needed to explore whether bra removal is imperative for AED pad placement and defibrillation.

Is there a difference in ischaemic heart disease deaths that occur without a preceding hospital admission in people who live in rural compared with urban areas of Aotearoa New Zealand? An observational study

OBJECTIVES

Unlike comparable countries, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mortality is similar among patients who present to rural and urban hospitals in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) deaths that occurred without a preceding hospital admission in rural and urban populations explained this finding.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study using the National Mortality Collection (MORT) and National Minimum Dataset (NMDS) for hospital discharges datasets.

SETTING

People in NZ who died from IHD were categorised based on their rural-urban status (U1 (major urban), U2 (large urban) and rural) using the Geographic Classification for Health and prioritised ethnicity (Māori-NZ's Indigenous population and non-Māori).

PARTICIPANTS

All people 20+ years who died from IHD between July 2011 and December 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

The outcome was the lack of a hospital admission preceding IHD death, identified by linking the NMDS with MORT. This was measured for the 30 days and 1 year prior to death and for all-cause and IHD hospitalisations separately.

RESULTS

Of the 37 296 deaths, a similar percentage of rural and urban residents died without an all-cause (rural 63.2%, U2 60.8%, U1 62.8%) or IHD (rural 70.9%, U2 69.0%, U1 70.1%) admission in the preceding 30 days, or without an all-cause (rural 32.8%, U2 35.5%, U1 35.5%) or IHD (rural 52.7%, U2 52.6%, U1 51.9%) admission in the preceding year. Exceptions were deaths that occurred without a prior admission for rural non-Māori aged 55-64 (higher odds) and 75+ years (lower odds) compared with U1 non-Māori 55-64 and 75+ years, respectively, across all four outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the lack of difference in ACS mortality for patients who present to NZ rural and urban hospitals is not explained by IHD death that occurred without a recent preceding hospital admission.

Automated loss of pulse detection on a consumer smartwatch

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a time-sensitive emergency that requires prompt identification and intervention: sudden, unwitnessed cardiac arrest is nearly unsurvivable1-3. A cardinal sign of cardiac arrest is sudden loss of pulse4. Automated biosensor detection of unwitnessed cardiac arrest, and dispatch of medical assistance, may improve survivability given the substantial prognostic role of time3,5, but only if the false-positive burden on public emergency medical systems is minimized5-7. Here we show that a multimodal, machine learning-based algorithm on a smartwatch can reach performance thresholds making it deployable at a societal scale. First, using photoplethysmography, we show that wearable photoplethysmography measurements of peripheral pulselessness (induced through an arterial occlusion model) manifest similarly to pulselessness caused by a common cardiac arrest arrhythmia, ventricular fibrillation. On the basis of the similarity of the photoplethysmography signal (from ventricular fibrillation or arterial occlusion), we developed and validated a loss of pulse detection algorithm using data from peripheral pulselessness and free-living conditions. Following its development, we evaluated the end-to-end algorithm prospectively: there was 1 unintentional emergency call per 21.67 user-years across two prospective studies; the sensitivity was 67.23% (95% confidence interval of 64.32% to 70.05%) in a prospective arterial occlusion cardiac arrest simulation model. These results indicate an opportunity, deployable at scale, for wearable-based detection of sudden loss of pulse while minimizing societal costs of excess false detections7.

Optimisation of the deployment of automated external defibrillators in public places in England

Background

Ambulance services treat over 32,000 patients sustaining an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually, receiving over 90,000 calls. The definitive treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is defibrillation. Prompt treatment with an automated external defibrillator can improve survival significantly. However, their location in the community limits opportunity for their use. There is a requirement to identify the optimal location for an automated external defibrillator to improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest coverage, to improve the chances of survival.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of data collected by the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes registry on historical out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, data held on the location of automated external defibrillators registered with ambulance services, and locations of points of interest. Walking distance was calculated between out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, registered automated external defibrillators and points of interest designated as potential sites for an automated external defibrillator. An out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was deemed to be covered if it occurred within 500 m of a registered automated external defibrillator or points of interest. For the optimisation analysis, mathematical models focused on the maximal covering location problem were adapted. A de novo decision-analytic model was developed for the cost-effectiveness analysis and used as a vehicle for assessing the costs and benefits (in terms of quality-adjusted life-years) of deployment strategies. A meeting of stakeholders was held to discuss and review the results of the study.

Results

Historical out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurred in more deprived areas and automated external defibrillators were placed in more affluent areas. The median out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - automated external defibrillator distance was 638 m and 38.9% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurred within 500 m of an automated external defibrillator. If an automated external defibrillator was placed in all points of interests, the proportion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests covered varied greatly. The greatest coverage was achieved with cash machines. Coverage loss, assuming an automated external defibrillator was not available outside working hours, varied between points of interest and was greatest for schools. Dividing the country up into 1 km2 grids and placing an automated external defibrillator in the centre increased coverage significantly to 78.8%. The optimisation model showed that if automated external defibrillators were placed in each points-of-interest location out-of-hospital cardiac arrest coverage levels would improve above the current situation significantly, but it would not reach that of optimisation-based placement (based on grids). The coverage efficiency provided by the optimised grid points was unmatched by any points of interest in any region. An economic evaluation determined that all alternative placements were associated with higher quality-adjusted life-years and costs compared to current placement, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over £30,000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year. The most appealing strategy was automated external defibrillator placement in halls and community centres, resulting in an additional 0.007 quality-adjusted life-year (non-parametric 95% confidence interval 0.004 to 0.011), an additional expected cost of £223 (non-parametric 95% confidence interval £148 to £330) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £32,418 per quality-adjusted life-year. The stakeholder meeting agreed that the current distribution of registered publicly accessible automated external defibrillators was suboptimal, and that there was a disparity in their location in respect of deprivation and other health inequalities.

Conclusions

We have developed a data-driven framework to support decisions about public-access automated external defibrillator locations, using optimisation and statistical models. Optimising automated external defibrillator locations can result in substantial improvement in coverage. Comparison between placement based on points of interest and current placement showed that the former improves coverage but is associated with higher costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values over £30,000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year.

Study registration

This study is registered as researchregistry5121.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127368) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 13, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Cardiac arrest: Pre-hospital strategies to facilitate successful resuscitation and improve recovery rates

The estimated annual incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is approximately 120 cases per 100000 inhabitants in western countries. Although the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of automated external defibrillator are increasing, the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge is no more than 8%. To date, various devices and methods have been utilized in the initial CPR approach targeting to improve survival and neurological outcomes in OHCA patients. The aim of this review is to discuss strategies that facilitate resuscitation, increase the chance to achieve return to spontaneous circulation and improve survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcomes in the pre-hospital setting.

Advancements in automated external and wearable cardiac defibrillators

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Survival statistics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remain unsatisfactory. Prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is crucial for improving survival. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and wearable cardiac defibrillators (WCDs) seek to improve the survival rates following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We aim to review the indications, utility, advancements, and limitations of AEDs and WCDs, as well as their role in contemporary and future clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements in these technologies, such as smartphone applications and drone delivery of AEDs and less inappropriate shocks and decreased size of WCDs, have increased their ubiquity and efficacy. However, implementation of this technology remains limited due to lack of resources and suboptimal patient adherence.

SUMMARY

Out of hospital cardiac arrests continue to pose a significant public health challenge. Advancements in AEDs and WCDs aim to facilitate prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms with the goal of improving survival rates. However, they remain underutilized due to limited resources and suboptimal patient adherence. As these technologies continue to evolve to become smaller, lighter and more affordable, their utilization and accessibility are expected to improve.

Factors influencing the delivery of automated external defibrillators by lay rescuers to the scene of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in schools

Aim

Timely use of automated external defibrillators by lay rescuers significantly improves the chances of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases. We aimed to identify the factors influencing whether lay rescuers bring automated external defibrillators to the scene of nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in schoolchildren in Japan.

Methods

Data on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests among schoolchildren from April 2008 to December 2021 were obtained from the database of the Stop and Prevent cardIac aRrest, Injury, and Trauma in Schools study. A multivariate Modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors influencing whether a lay rescuer brought an automated external defibrillator to the scene of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the year-by-year changes in automated external defibrillator delivery for each factor were assessed.

Results

Of the 333 nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across the entire study period, lay rescuers brought automated external defibrillators in 85.3% of cases. Female patients and incidents occurring during non-sports activities had lower proportions of automated external defibrillator delivery. Significant year-by-year improvements in automated external defibrillator delivery were observed, with the overall proportion increasing from 73.7% in 2008-2010 to 93.3% in 2020-2021. However, the trend was less pronounced for female students, non-sports activities, and incidents occurring in classrooms/other locations than their counterparts.

Conclusions

AED delivery to the scene of OHCA in schools has improved overall, with the proportion increasing from 73.7% in 2008-2010 to 93.3% in 2020-2021. However, there is still room for improvement, particularly in female patients, and incidents during non-sports activities.

2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Catastrophic injuries and exertional medical events in lacrosse among youth, high school and collegiate athletes: longitudinal surveillance over four decades (1982-2020)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence rates (IRs) of catastrophic injuries and exertional medical events in lacrosse athletes.

METHODS

Catastrophic injuries and exertional medical events in lacrosse in the US among youth or amateur, high school and college athletes were analysed from the National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research (NCCSIR) database from 1982/83 to 2019/20. Frequencies, IRs per 100,000 athlete-seasons (AS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Participation data were gathered from the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS), National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and USA Lacrosse.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine catastrophic events (16 youth or amateur, 36 high school and 17 college; 84% male) occurred in US lacrosse from 7/1/1982 to 6/30/2020. Thirty-six percent of all incidents were fatal. The overall IR was 0.5 per 100,000 AS (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). There were 15 cases of non-traumatic sudden cardiac arrests (SCAs) and 15 incidents of commotio cordis. Fatality rates from SCA and commotio cordis decreased 95% (IRR = 0.05; 95% CI: 0, 0.2) from 1982/83-2006/07 to 2007/08-2019/20. Incidence rates were higher for collegiate versus high school 1982/83-2019/20 (IRR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 5.7) and collegiate versus youth 2005/06-2019/20 (IRR = 8.0; 95% CI: 3.0, 21.4) level. Contact with a stick or ball (41%) and contact with another player (20%) were the primary mechanisms of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of catastrophic events during lacrosse was higher among collegiate than high school or youth athletes. SCA from an underlying cardiac condition or from commotio cordis was the most common catastrophic event. Fatality rates from catastrophic injuries have declined significantly over the study period, perhaps driven by protective measures adopted by lacrosse governing bodies.

Walking time to nearest public automated external defibrillator for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a major U.S. city

Background

How frequently out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs within a reasonable walking distance to the nearest public automated external defibrillator (AED) has not been well studied.

Methods

As Kansas City, Missouri has a comprehensive city-wide public AED registry, we identified adults with an OHCA in Kansas City during 2019-2022 in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. Using AED location data from the registry, we computed walking times between OHCAs and the nearest registered AED using the Haversine formula, a mapping algorithm to calculate walking distance in miles from one location to another. Results were stratified by OHCA location (home vs. public) and by whether the patient received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Results

Of 1,522 OHCAs, 1,291 (84.8%) occurred at home and 231 (15.2%) in public. Among at-home OHCAs, 634 (49.1%) received bystander CPR and no patients had an AED applied even as 297 (23.0%) were within a 4-minute walk to the closest public AED. Among OHCAs in public, 108 (46.8%) were within a 4-minute walk to the closest public AED. For public OHCAs within a 4-minute walk, bystanders applied an AED in 13 (12.0%) of these cases and in 24.5% (13/53) of those who received bystander CPR.

Conclusion

In one U.S. city with a publicly available AED registry, there were no instances in which a bystander accessed a public AED for an OHCA at home. For OHCAs in public, nearly half occurred within a 4-minute walk to the closest AED but bystander use of an AED was low.

Patient Preferences for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care in South Africa: A Discrete Choice Experiment

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the trade-offs low-resource setting community members were willing to make in regard to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care using a discrete choice experiment survey.

METHODS

We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to a sample of community members 18 years or older across South Africa between April and May 2022. Participants were presented with 18 paired choice tasks comprised of 5 attributes (distance to closest adequate facility, provider of care, response time, chances of survival, and transport cost) and a range of 3 to 5 levels. We used mixed logit models to evaluate respondents' preferences for selected attributes.

RESULTS

Analyses were based on 2228 responses and 40 104 choice tasks. Patients valued care with the shortest response time, delivered by the highest qualified individuals, which placed them within the shortest distance of an adequate facility, gave them the highest chance of survival, and costed the least. In addition, patients preferred care delivered by their family members over care delivered by the lay public. The highest mean willingness-to-pay for increased survival is 11 699 South African rand (ZAR), followed by distance to health facility (8108 ZAR), and response time (5678 ZAR), and the lowest for increasing specialization of provider (1287 ZAR).

CONCLUSIONS

In low-resource settings, it may align with patients' preference to include targeted resuscitation training for family members of individuals with high-risk for cardiac arrest as a part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest intervention strategies.

Knowledge and barriers of out of hospital cardiac arrest bystander intervention and public access automated external defibrillator use in the Northeast of England: a cross-sectional survey study

Intervention by members of the public during an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHAC) including resuscitation attempts and accessible automated external defibrillator (AED) has been shown to improve survival. This study aimed to investigate the OHCA and AED knowledge and confidence, and barriers to intervention, of the public of North East England, UK. This study used a face-to-face cross-sectional survey on a public high street in Newcastle, UK. Participants were asked unprompted to explain what they would do when faced with an OHCA collapse. Chi-Square analysis was used to test the association of the independent variables sex and first aid trained on the participants' responses. Of the 421 participants recruited to our study, 82.9% (n = 349) reported that they would know what to do during an OHCA collapse. The most frequent OHCA action mentioned was call 999 (64.1%, n = 270/421) and 58.2% (n = 245/421) of participants reported that they would commence CPR. However, only 14.3% (n = 60/421) of participants spontaneously mentioned that they would locate an AED, while only 4.5% (n = 19/421) recounted that they would apply the AED. Just over half of participants (50.8%, n = 214/421) were first aid trained, with statistically more females (57.3%, n = 126/220) than males (43.9%,  n = 87/198) being first aiders (p = 0.01 χ2 = 7.41). Most participants (80.3%, n = 338/421) knew what an AED was, and 34.7% (n = 326/421) reported that they knew how to use one, however, only 11.9% (n = 50/421) mentioned that they would actually shock a patient. Being first aid trained increased the likelihood of freely recounting actions for OHCA and AED intervention. The most common barrier to helping during an OHCA was lack of knowledge (29.9%, n = 126/421). Although most participants reported they would know what to do during an OHCA and had knowledge of an AED, low numbers of participants spontaneously mentioned specific OHCA and AED actions. Improving public knowledge would help improve the public's confidence of intervening during an OHCA and may improve OHCA survival.

New Innovations to Address Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Mortality from sudden cardiac arrest remains high despite increased awareness and advancements in emergency resuscitation efforts. Various gaps exist in bystander resuscitation, automated external defibrillators, and access. Significant racial, gender, and geographic disparities have also been found. A myriad of recent innovations in sudden cardiac arrest uses new machine learning algorithms with high levels of performance. These have been applied to a broad range of efforts to identify individuals at high risk, recognize emergencies, and diagnose high-risk cardiac arrhythmias. Such technological advancements must be coupled to novel public health approaches to best implement these innovations in an equitable way. The authors propose a data-driven, technology-enabled system of care within a public health system of care to ultimately improve sudden cardiac arrest outcomes.

Emerging Evidence in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-A Critical Appraisal of the Cardiac Arrest Center

The morbidity and mortality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to presumed cardiac causes have remained unwaveringly high over the last few decades. Less than 10% of patients survive until hospital discharge. Treatment of OHCA patients has traditionally relied on expert opinions. However, there is growing evidence on managing OHCA patients favorably during the prehospital phase, coronary and intensive care, and even beyond hospital discharge. To improve outcomes in OHCA, experts have proposed the establishment of cardiac arrest centers (CACs) as pivotal elements. CACs are expert facilities that pool resources and staff, provide infrastructure, treatment pathways, and networks to deliver comprehensive and guideline-recommended post-cardiac arrest care, as well as promote research. This review aims to address knowledge gaps in the 2020 consensus on CACs of major European medical associations, considering novel evidence on critical issues in both pre- and in-hospital OHCA management, such as the timing of coronary angiography and the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). The goal is to harmonize new evidence with the concept of CACs.

Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study

Background

Community First Responders are trained volunteers dispatched by ambulance services to potentially life-threatening emergencies such as cardiac arrest in the first vital minutes to provide care until highly skilled ambulance staff arrive. Community First Responder schemes were first introduced to support ambulance services in rural communities, where access to prehospital emergency care is more likely to be delayed. Evidence is lacking on their contribution to rural healthcare provision, how care is provided and how this might be improved.

Objectives

We aimed to describe Community First Responder activities, organisation, costs of provision and outcomes of care together with perceptions and views of patients, public, Community First Responders, ambulance service staff and commissioners of their current and future role including innovations in the rural health and care workforce.

Design

We used a mixed-methods design, using a lens of pragmatism and the 'actor', 'behaviour change' and 'causal pathway' framework to integrate quantitative routine and qualitative (policy, guideline and protocol documents with stakeholder interview) data from 6 of 10 English ambulance services. We identified potential innovations in Community First Responder provision and prioritised these using a modified nominal group technique. Patients and public were involved throughout the study.

Results

In 4.5 million incidents from six English regional ambulance services during 2019, pre COVID-19 pandemic, Community First Responders attended first a higher proportion of calls in rural areas (almost 4% of calls) than in urban areas (around 1.5%). They were significantly more likely to be called out to rural (vs. urban) areas and to attend older (vs. younger), white (vs. minority ethnic) people in more affluent (vs. deprived) areas with cardiorespiratory and neurological (vs. other emergency) conditions for higher-priority emergency or urgent (category 1 and 2 compared with category 3, 4 or 5) calls but did also attend lower-category calls for conditions such as falls. We examined 10 documents from seven ambulance services. Ambulance policies and protocols integrated Community First Responders into ambulance service structures to achieve the safe and effective operation of volunteers. Costs, mainly for training, equipment and support, varied widely but were not always clearly delineated. Community First Responders enabled a faster prehospital response time. There was no clear benefit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. A specific Community First Responder falls response reduced ambulance attendances and was potentially cost saving. We conducted semistructured interviews with 47 different stakeholders engaged in Community First Responder functions. This showed the trajectory of becoming a Community First Responder, the Community First Responder role, governance and practice, and the positive views of Community First Responders from stakeholders despite public lack of understanding of their role. Community First Responders' scope of practice varied between ambulance services and had developed into new areas. Innovations prioritised at the consensus workshop were changes in processes and structures and an expanded scope of practice supported by training, which included counselling, peer support, better communication with the control room, navigation and communication technology, and specific mandatory and standardised training for Community First Responders.

Limitations

Missing data and small numbers of interviews in some stakeholder groups (patients, commissioners) are sources of bias.

Future research

Future research should include a robust evaluation of innovations involving Community First Responders.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04279262.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127920) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 18. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex - The role of arrest recognition

PURPOSE

To assess whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differed by patient sex among bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of paramedic-attended OHCA in New South Wales (NSW) between January 2017 to December 2019 (restricted to bystander-witnessed cases). Exclusions included OHCA in aged care, medical facilities, with advance care directives, from non-medical causes. Multivariate logistic regression examined the association of patient sex with bystander CPR. Secondary outcomes were OHCA recognition, bystander AED application, initial shockable rhythm, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 4,491cases, females were less likely to receive bystander CPR in private residential (Adjusted Odds ratio [AOR]: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70-0.95) and public locations (AOR: 0.58, 95%CI:0.39-0.88). OHCA recognition during the emergency call was lower for females arresting in public locations (84.6% vs 91.6%, p = 0.002) and this partially explained the association of sex with bystander CPR (∼44%). This difference in recognition was not observed in private residential locations (p = 0.2). Bystander AED use was lower for females (4.8% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001); however, after adjustment for location and other covariates, this relationship was no longer significant (AOR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60-1.12). Females were less likely to be in an initial shockable rhythm (AOR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.44-0.61), but more likely to survive the event (AOR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15-1.56). There was no sex difference in survival to hospital discharge (AOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.77-1.19).

CONCLUSION

OHCA recognition and bystander CPR differ by patient sex in NSW. Research is needed to understand why this difference occurs and to raise public awareness of this issue.

Prediction model for future OHCAs based on geospatial and demographic data: An observational study

This study used demographic data in a novel prediction model to identify areas with high risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in order to target prehospital preparedness. We combined data from the nationwide Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry with geographical- and demographic data on a hectare level. Hectares were classified in a hierarchy according to characteristics and pooled to square kilometers (km2). Historical OHCA incidence of each hectare group was supplemented with a predicted annual risk of at least 1 OHCA to ensure future applicability. We recorded 19,090 valid OHCAs during 2016 to 2019. The mean annual OHCA rate was highest in residential areas with no point of public interest and 100 to 1000 residents per hectare (9.7/year/km2) followed by pedestrian streets with multiple shops (5.8/year/km2), areas with no point of public interest and 50 to 100 residents (5.5/year/km2), and malls with a mean annual incidence per km2 of 4.6. Other high incidence areas were public transport stations, schools and areas without a point of public interest and 10 to 50 residents. These areas combined constitute 1496 km2 annually corresponding to 3.4% of the total area of Denmark and account for 65% of the OHCA incidence. Our prediction model confirms these areas to be of high risk and outperforms simple previous incidence in identifying future risk-sites. Two thirds of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were identified in only 3.4% of the area of Denmark. This area was easily identified as having multiple residents or having airports, malls, pedestrian shopping streets or schools. This result has important implications for targeted intervention such as automatic defibrillators available to the public. Further, demographic information should be considered when implementing such interventions.

Effectiveness of Blended Versus Traditional Refresher Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Generally, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills decline substantially over time. By combining web-based self-regulated learning with hands-on practice, blended training can be a time- and resource-efficient approach enabling individuals to acquire or refresh CPR skills at their convenience. However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of blended CPR refresher training compared with that of the traditional method.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated and compared the effectiveness of traditional and blended CPR training through 6-month and 12-month refresher sessions with CPR ability indicators.

METHODS

This study recruited participants aged ≥18 years from the Automated External Defibrillator Donation Project. The participants were divided into 4 groups based on the format of the CPR training and refresher training received: (1) initial traditional training (a 30-minute instructor-led, hands-on session) and 6-month traditional refresher training (Traditional6 group), (2) initial traditional training and 6-month blended refresher training (an 18-minute e-learning module; Mixed6 group), (3) initial traditional training and 12-month blended refresher training (Mixed12 group), and (4) initial blended training and 6-month blended refresher training (Blended6 group). CPR knowledge and performance were evaluated immediately after initial training. For each group, following initial training but before refresher training, a learning effectiveness assessment was conducted at 12 and 24 months. CPR knowledge was assessed using a written test with 15 multiple-choice questions, and CPR performance was assessed through an examiner-rated skill test and objectively through manikin feedback. A generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze changes in CPR ability indicators.

RESULTS

This study recruited 1163 participants (mean age 41.82, SD 11.6 years; n=725, 62.3% female), with 332 (28.5%), 270 (23.2%), 258 (22.2%), and 303 (26.1%) participants in the Mixed6, Traditional6, Mixed12, and Blended6 groups, respectively. No significant between-group difference was observed in knowledge acquisition after initial training (P=.23). All groups met the criteria for high-quality CPR skills (ie, average compression depth: 5-6 cm; average compression rate: 100-120 beats/min; chest recoil rate: >80%); however, a higher proportion (98/303, 32.3%) of participants receiving blended training initially demonstrated high-quality CPR skills. At 12 and 24 months, CPR skills had declined in all the groups, but the decline was significantly higher in the Mixed12 group, whereas the differences were not significant between the other groups. This finding indicates that frequent retraining can maintain high-quality CPR skills and that blended refresher training is as effective as traditional refresher training.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that 6-month refresher training sessions for CPR are more effective for maintaining high-quality CPR skills, and that as refreshers, self-learning e-modules are as effective as instructor-led sessions. Although the blended learning approach is cost and resource effective, factors such as participant demographics, training environment, and level of engagement must be considered to maximize the potential of this approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IGOGO NCT05659108; https://www.cgmh-igogo.tw.

Improving survival after cardiac arrest in Europe: The synergetic effect of rescue chain strategies

Sudden cardiac arrest is a global problem and is considered the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries. Patient survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary significantly between countries and continents. In particular, the 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Resuscitation Guidelines place a special focus on the chain of survival of patients after OHCA. As a complex, interconnected approach, the focus is on: Raising awareness for cardiac arrest and lay resuscitation, school children's education in resuscitation "KIDS SAVE LIVES", first responder systems - technologies to engage the community, telephone-assisted resuscitation (telephone-CPR; T-CPR) by dispatchers, and cardiac arrest centers (CAC) for further treatment in specialized hospitals. The Systems Saving Lives approach is a comprehensive strategy that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all links in the chain of survival following an OHCA, with a particular focus on the relationship between the community and emergency medical services (EMS). This system-level approach emphasizes the importance of the connection between all those involved in the chain of survival. It has a high potential to improve overall survival after OHCA. Therefore, it is recommended that these strategies be promoted and expanded in all countries.

Effects of Dispatcher-Assisted Public-Access Defibrillation Programs on the Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Before-and-After Study

BACKGROUND

Public access defibrillation (PAD) programs have been implemented globally over the past decade. Although PAD can substantially increase the survival of cardiac arrest, PAD use remains low. This study aimed to evaluate whether drawing upon the successful experiences of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation programs would increase the use of PAD in dispatcher-assisted PAD programs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study using a before-and-after design was conducted in Taoyuan City using a local out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry system and data of dispatcher performance derived from audio recordings. The primary outcomes were the rate of bystander PAD use, sustained return of spontaneous circulation, survival to discharge, and favorable neurological outcomes. The secondary outcomes were the performance of dispatchers in terms of PAD instruction and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation administration, the time interval indicators of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A total of 1159 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: the before-run-in group (502 patients) and the after-run-in group (657 patients). No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of baseline characteristics. The rate of PAD use in the after-run-in group significantly increased from 5.0% to 8.7% (P=0.015). The rate of favorable neurological outcomes increased from 4.4% to 5.9%, which was not a statistically significant difference. Compared with the before-run-in group, the rate of successful automated external defibrillator acquisition was 13.5% in the after-run-in group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a dispatcher-assisted PAD protocol in a municipality setting significantly increased bystander PAD use without affecting dispatcher performance in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest recognition, cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction, or dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation time indicators.

Ethnic differences of the care pathway following an out-of-hospital cardiac event: A systematic review

AIM

This systematic review aimed to determine to what extent and why the care pathways for acute cardiac events in the community might differ for minoritised ethnic populations compared to non-minoritised populations. It also sought to identify the barriers and enablers that could influence variations in access to care for minoritised populations.

METHODS

A multi-database search was conducted for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2023. A combination of MeSH terms and keywords was used. Inclusion criteria for papers were published in English, adult population, the primary health condition was an acute cardiac event, and the primary outcomes were disaggregated by ethnicity or race. A narrative review of extracted data was performed, and findings were reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 3552 articles identified using the search strategy, 40 were deemed eligible for the review. Studies identified a range of variables in the care pathway that differed by ethnicity or race. These could be grouped as time to care, transportation, event related-variables, EMS interactions and symptoms. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSION

The extent and reasons for differences in cardiac care pathways are considerable. There are several remediable barriers and enablers that require attention to achieve equitable access to care for minoritised populations.

A study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of smartphone-activated first responders with ultraportable defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The First Responder Shock Trial (FIRST)

Objective

To describe the First Responder Shock Trial (FIRST), which aims to determine whether equipping frequently responding, smartphone-activated (GoodSAM) first responders with an ultraportable AED can increase 30-day survival rates in OHCA.

Methods

The FIRST trial is an investigator-initiated, bi-national (Victoria, Australia and New Zealand), registry-nested cluster-randomised controlled trial where the unit of randomisation is the smartphone-activated (GoodSAM) first responder. High-frequency GoodSAM responders are randomised 1:1 to receive an ultraportable, single-use AED or standard alert procedures using the GoodSAM app.The primary outcome is survival to 30 days. The secondary outcome measures (shockable rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation, event survival, and time to first shock delivery) are routinely collected by OHCA registries in both regions. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (Registration: ACTRN12622000448741) on 22 March 2022.

Results

The trial started in November 2022 and the last patient is expected to be enrolled in November 2024. We aim to detect a 7% increase in the proportion of 30-day survivors, from 9% in patients attended by control responders to 16% in patients attended by responders randomised to the ultraportable AED intervention arm. With 80% power, an alpha of 0.05, a cluster size of 1.5 and a coefficient of variation for cluster sizes of 1, the sample size required to detect this difference is 714 (357 per arm).

Conclusion

The FIRST study will increase our understanding of the potential role of portable AED use by smartphone-activated community responders and their impact on survival outcomes.

Wolf Creek XVII Part 5: Mobile AEDs

Introduction

Millions of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occur globally each year. Survival after OHCA can be improved with the use of automated external defibrillators (AED). The main strategy for facilitating bystander defibrillation has been fixed-location public access defibrillators (PADs). New strategies of mobile AEDs depart from the model of static PADs and have the potential to address known barriers to early defibrillation and improve outcomes.

Methods

Mobile AEDs was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised, and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category.

Results

Top knowledge gaps center around understanding the impact of mobile AEDs on OHCA outcomes in various settings and the impact of novel AED technologies. Top barriers to translation include questionable public comfort/acceptance, financial/regulatory constraints, and a lack of centralized accountability. Top research priorities focus on understanding the impact of the mobile AED strategies and technologies on time to defibrillation and OHCA outcomes.

Conclusion

This work informs research agendas, funding priorities and policy decisions around using mobile AEDs to optimize prehospital response to OHCA.

The Role of Automated External Defibrillator Use in the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Rate and Outcome: A Systematic Review

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a significant cause of death. The chance of survival significantly increases when immediate defibrillation with an on-site automated external defibrillator (AED) is available. Our aim is to systematically evaluate the impact of public access defibrillators (PAD) on the outcomes of outpatient cardiac arrest. We conducted a systematic review of the data from global studies on the role of bystander and emergency medical service (EMS) interventions, primarily focusing on the usage of AEDs, during OHCA events. The results highlight the critical significance of PADs in improving survival outcomes in OHCA settings. The majority of OHCA incidents occurred in private residences, but public spaces such as schools and airports had better outcomes, likely due to AED accessibility and trained individuals. Placing AEDs in public areas, especially high-risk zones, can boost survival chances. Timely defibrillation, particularly by bystanders, correlated with better survival and neurological conditions. The review emphasizes the importance of widespread cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AED training, strategic AED placement, and continuous monitoring of interventions and outcomes to enhance survival rates and neurological recovery after OHCAs. This systematic review showed that bystander interventions, including CPR and AED usage, significantly increased the survival rate. Overall, immediate response and accessibility to AEDs in public areas can significantly improve outcomes in OHCA events.

Machine learning-based analysis of regional differences in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest outcomes and resuscitation interventions in Japan

Refining out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) resuscitation protocols for local emergency practices is vital. The lack of comprehensive evaluation methods for individualized protocols impedes targeted improvements. Thus, we employed machine learning to assess emergency medical service (EMS) records for examining regional disparities in time reduction strategies. In this retrospective study, we examined Japanese EMS records and neurological outcomes from 2015 to 2020 using nationwide data. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with cardiogenic OHCA and visualized EMS activity time variations across prefectures. A five-layer neural network generated a neurological outcome predictive model that was trained on 80% of the data and tested on the remaining 20%. We evaluated interventions associated with changes in prognosis by simulating these changes after adjusting for time factors, including EMS contact to hospital arrival and initial defibrillation or drug administration. The study encompassed 460,540 patients, with the model's area under the curve and accuracy being 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. Reducing transport time and defibrillation improved outcomes universally, while combining transport time and drug administration showed varied efficacy. In conclusion, the association of emergency activity time with neurological outcomes varied across Japanese prefectures, suggesting the need to set targets for reducing activity time in localized emergency protocols.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring at school in France: A nation-wide retrospective cohort study from the RéAC registry

AIM

We sought to describe the characteristics of at-school out-of-hospital cardiac arrests cases, subsequent basic life support, as well as ultimate patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a nation-wide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study from the French national population-based RéAC out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry (July 2011 - March 2023). We compared the characteristics and outcomes of cases occurring at schools vs. in other public places.

RESULTS

Of the 149,088 national out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 25,071 were public: 86 (0.3%) and 24,985 (99.7%) in schools and other public places, respectively. At-school out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, in comparison to other public places, were: significantly younger (median: 42.5 vs. 58 years, p < 0.001); more commonly of a medical cause (90.7% vs. 63.8%, p < 0.001), more commonly bystander-witnessed (93.0% vs. 73.4%, p < 0.001) and recipients of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (78.8% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.001) with shorter median no-flow durations (2 min. vs. 7 min.); with greater bystander automated external defibrillator application (38.9% vs. 18.4%) and defibrillation (23.6%, vs. 7.9%; all p < 0.001). At-school patients had greater rates of return of spontaneous circulation than out-of-school ones (47.7%, vs. 31.8%; p = 0.002), higher rates of survival at arrival at hospital (60.5% vs. 30.7%; p < 0.001) and at 30-days (34.9% vs. 11.6%; p < 0.001), and survival with favourable neurological outcomes at 30 days (25.9% vs. 9.2%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

At-school out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were rare in France, however demonstrated favourable prognostic features and outcomes. The use of automated external defibrillators in at-school cases, while more common than cases occurring elsewhere, should be improved.

Pre-Arrival Care of the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Victim

Lay rescuers play a pivotal role in the recognition and initial management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The provision of timely pre-arrival care by lay responders, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of automated external defibrillator before emergency medical service arrival, is important link in the chain of survival and has been shown to improve outcomes from cardiac arrest. Although physicians are not directly involved in bystander response to cardiac arrest, they play a key role in emphasizing the importance of bystander interventions.

Resuscitation Strategies for Maximizing Survival

There is no single resuscitation strategy that will uniformly improve cardiac arrest outcomes. Traditional vital signs cannot be relied on in cardiac arrest, and the use of continuous capnography, regional cerebral tissue oxygenation, and continuous arterial monitoring are options for use early defibrillation are critical elements of resuscitation. Cardio-cerebral perfusion may be improved with the use of active compression-decompression CPR, an impedance threshold device, and head-up CPR. In refractory shockable arrest, if ECPR is not an option, consider changing defibrillator pad placement and/or double defibrillation, additional medication options, and possibly stellate ganglion block.

Development of an automatic device performing chest compression and external defibrillation: An animal-based pilot study

BACKGROUND

Automatic chest compression devices (ACCDs) can promote high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and are widely used worldwide. Early application of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) along with high-quality CPR is crucial for favorable outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest. Here, we developed an automated CPR (A-CPR) apparatus that combines ACCD and AED and evaluated its performance in a pilot animal-based study.

METHODS

Eleven pigs (n = 5, A-CPR group; n = 6, ACCD CPR and AED [conventional CPR (C-CPR)] group) were enrolled in this study. After 2 min observation without any treatment following ventricular fibrillation induction, CPR with a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio was performed for 6 min, mimicking basic life support (BLS). A-CPR or C-CPR was applied immediately after BLS, and resuscitation including chest compression and defibrillation, was performed following a voice prompt from the A-CPR device or AED. Hemodynamic parameters, including aortic pressure, right atrial pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, and end-tidal carbon dioxide, were monitored during resuscitation. Time variables, including time to start rhythm analysis, time to charge, time to defibrillate, and time to subsequent chest compression, were also measured.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for arterial carbon dioxide pressure (39 in A-CPR vs. 33 in C-CPR, p = 0.034), between the two groups. There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters between the groups. However, time to charge (28.9 ± 5.6 s, A-CPR group; 47.2 ± 12.4 s, C-CPR group), time to defibrillate (29.1 ± 7.2 s, A-CPR group; 50.5 ± 12.3 s, C-CPR group), and time to subsequent chest compression (32.4 ± 6.3 s, A-CPR group; 56.3 ± 10.7 s, C-CPR group) were shorter in the A-CPR group than in the C-CPR group (p = 0.015, 0.034 and 0.02 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A-CPR can provide effective chest compressions and defibrillation, thereby shortening the time required for defibrillation.

Public attitudes towards automated external defibrillators: results of a survey in the Australian general population

Background

Swift defibrillation by lay responders using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) increases survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study evaluated newly designed yellow-red vs. commonly used green-white signage for AEDs and cabinets and assessed public attitudes to using AEDs during OHCA.

Methods

New yellow-red signage was designed to enable easy identification of AEDs and cabinets. A prospective, cross-sectional study of the Australian public was conducted using an electronic, anonymised questionnaire between November 2021 and June 2022. The validated net promoter score investigated public engagement with the signage. Likert scales and binary comparisons evaluated preference, comfort and likelihood of using AEDs for OHCA.

Results

The yellow-red signage for AED and cabinet was preferred by 73.0% and 88%, respectively, over the green-white counterparts. Only 32% were uncomfortable with using AEDs, and only 19% indicated a low likelihood of using AEDs in OHCA.

Conclusion

The majority of the Australian public surveyed preferred yellow-red over green-white signage for AED and cabinet and indicated comfort and likelihood of using AEDs in OHCA. Steps are necessary to standardise yellow-red signage of AED and cabinet and enable widespread availability of AEDs for public access defibrillation.

Automated external defibrillators and basic life support practices in secondary schools: a nationwide study

AIM

Cardiac arrest prevention in schools has recently gained momentum. The survival benefit in schools who have access to defibrillators is clear, with far better survival outcomes in children or adults who sustain a cardiac arrest on school grounds. The main objectives of this study were to assess sudden cardiac arrest prevention in Maltese schools, specifically the availability of defibrillators and staff competence in delivering resuscitation.

METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

An online-based questionnaire was distributed to all secondary schools across the Maltese archipelago. Data were collected, tabulated, and analysed using SPSS V.23. Most schools (n = 40, 74.1%) completed the questionnaire. Two schools documented a cardiac arrest in the past 10 years. 87.5% agreed that cardiac arrest prevention is an important health topic. Most have a defibrillator on the premises (n = 37, 92.5%). Only one defibrillator is usually available (n = 27, 75.0%). Despite the majority claiming its ease of accessibility (n = 35, 97.2%), most were not available on every floor (n = 37, 97.2%). Only one-third were close to a sporting facility (n = 11, 30.6%). Schools do not organise regular resuscitation courses (n = 21, 58.3%), with eight schools having five or more certified staff members (23.5%). The number of defibrillators did not influence the frequency of resuscitation courses at school (p = 0.607), and there was no association with the number of certified individuals (p = 0.860).

CONCLUSION

Defibrillators are not readily available at secondary schools and are often installed in low-risk areas. Most schools have only one staff member certified in resuscitation. These factors should be addressed with urgency.

A retrospective review of out of hospital cardiac arrest at Gillette Stadium: 10 years of experience at a large sports venue

Introduction

Rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at major sporting events are as high as 0.7 per 100,000 attendees. However, factors contributing to OHCA at mass gatherings have not been well-described. We describe our experience with ten years of medical oversight and OHCA care at a professional football stadium.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of OHCA events between August 2010 and January 2020 at a 65,878-seat football stadium, with a single transporting EMS agency and a single receiving hospital. We analyzed EMS incident reports and matched patients to hospital records for outcome data.

Results

A total of 7,767,345 people attended 115 football games during the study period. There were 21 OHCAs (0.27 per 100,000 attendees). Ninety-five percent of OHCAs were witnessed and 71.4% had an initial shockable rhythm, with bystander AED use in 47.6%. Median EMS response time was 2 minutes (IQR 1-6). For 7 patients defibrillated by EMS, time to defibrillation was 4 minutes (IQR 4-11). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) occurred in 71%, with 47% having good 30-day neurologic survival. All patients with an initial rhythm of asystole died.

Conclusion

The ROSC rate at our stadium exceeded 70% with almost half surviving with good neurologic outcomes, substantially higher than that reported for the general public. We hope that our experience will provide valuable lessons to other similarly sized stadiums.

Automated external defibrillator delivery by drone in mountainous regions to support basic life support - A simulation study

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with poor survival rates. Factors that may enable survival include cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated by bystanders and early use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). This explorative simulation study was conceptualized to test the feasibility of a semi-autonomously operating drone that delivers an AED to a remote emergency location and its bystander-use.

Methods

Ten paramedics and nineteen laypersons were confronted with a manikin simulating an OHCA as single bystanders within a field test located in a mountainous region between Austria and Slovenia. The scenario included a mock-call to the local emergency response center that dispatched a drone towards the caller's GPS coordinates and supported the ongoing CPR. The outcomes were the successful delivery of the AED, the time to the first shock, hands-off times, and the overall performance of the CPR.

Results

The AED was delivered by drone and used in all 29 scenarios without serious adverse events. The flight time of the drone was in median 5:20 (range: 1:35-8:19) minutes. The paramedics delivered the first shock after a mean of 12:15 ± 2:03 min and hands-off times were 50 ± 22 s. The laypersons delivered the first shock after 14:04 ± 2:10 min and hands-off times were 2:11 ± 0:39 min. All participants felt confident in the handling of the delivered AED.

Conclusion

The delivery and usage of an AED via a semi-autonomously flying drone in a remote region is feasible. This approach can lead to early administration of shocks.

Public access defibrillation: challenges and new solutions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the current status of public access defibrillation and the various utility modalities of early defibrillation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Defibrillation with on-site automated external defibrillators (AEDs) has been the conventional approach for public access defibrillation. This strategy is highly effective in cardiac arrests occurring in close proximity to on-site AEDs; however, only a few cardiac arrests will be covered by this strategy. During the last decades, additional strategies for public access defibrillation have developed, including volunteer responder programmes and drone assisted AED-delivery. These programs have increased chances of early defibrillation within a greater radius, which remains an important factor for survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in the use of public access defibrillation show great potential for optimizing early defibrillation. With new technological solutions, AEDs can be transported to the cardiac arrest location reaching OHCAs in both public and private locations. Furthermore, new technological innovations could potentially identify and automatically alert the emergency medical services in nonwitnessed OHCA previously left untreated.

Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review

Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world, estimated to be responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Our understanding of the electrophysiological mechanisms of such arrhythmias has grown since they were formally characterized in the late nineteenth century, and this has led to the development of numerous devices and therapies that have markedly improved outcomes for patients affected by such conditions. Despite these advancements, the application of a single large shock remains the clinical standard for treating deadly tachyarrhythmias. Such defibrillating shocks are undoubtedly effective in terminating such arrhythmias; however, they are applied without forewarning, contributing to the patient's stress and anxiety; they can be intensely painful; and they can have adverse psychological and physiological effects on patients. In recent years, there has been interest in developing defibrillation protocols that can terminate arrhythmias without crossing the human pain threshold for energy delivery, generally estimated to be between 0.1 and 1 J. In this article, we review existing literature on the development of such low-energy defibrillation methods and their underlying mechanisms, in an attempt to broadly describe the current landscape of these technologies.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mediated Drug Delivery for First Aid

Timely administration of key medications toward patients with sudden diseases is critical to saving lives. However, slow transport of first-aid therapeutics and the potential absence of trained people for drug usage can lead to severe injuries or even death. Herein, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-mediated first-aid system for targeted delivery (uFAST) is developed. It allows unattended administration of emergency therapeutics-loaded transdermal microneedle (MN) patches toward patients to relieve symptoms by a contact-triggered microneedle applicator (CTMA). The implementability and safety of the uFAST for first aid is demonstrated in a severe hypoglycemic pig model by automatically delivering a glucagon patch with immediate and bioresponsive dual release modes. This platform technique may facilitate the development of UAV-mediated first-aid treatments for other sudden diseases.

Factors affecting public access defibrillator placement decisions in the United Kingdom: A survey study

Aim

This study aimed to understand current community PAD placement strategies and identify factors which influence PAD placement decision-making in the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods

Individuals, groups and organisations involved in PAD placement in the UK were invited to participate in an online survey collecting demographic information, facilitators and barriers to community PAD placement and information used to decide where a PAD is installed in their experiences. Survey responses were analysed through descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis.

Results

There were 106 included responses. Distance from another PAD (66%) and availability of a power source (63%) were most frequently used when respondents are deciding where best to install a PAD and historical occurrence of cardiac arrest (29%) was used the least. Three main themes were identified influencing PAD placement: (i) the relationship between the community and PADs emphasising community engagement to create buy-in; (ii) practical barriers and facilitators to PAD placement including securing consent, powering the cabinet, accessibility, security, funding, and guardianship; and (iii) 'risk assessment' methods to estimate the need for PADs including areas of high footfall, population density and type, areas experiencing health inequalities, areas with delayed ambulance response and current PAD provision.

Conclusion

Decision-makers want to install PADs in locations that maximise impact and benefit to the community, but this can be constrained by numerous social and infrastructural factors. The best location to install a PAD depends on local context; work is required to determine how to overcome barriers to optimal community PAD placement.