Association of Statin Dose With Amputation and Survival in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Long-Term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease in Veterans: Analysis of the Peripheral Artery Disease Long-Term Survival Study (PEARLS)

BACKGROUND

Contemporary research in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains limited due to lack of a national registry and low accuracy of diagnosis codes to identify patients with PAD.

METHODS

Leveraging a novel natural language processing system that identifies PAD with high accuracy using ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index values, we created a registry of 103 748 patients with new-onset PAD in the Veterans Health Administration. Study end points include mortality, cardiovascular events (hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or stroke) and limb events (hospitalization for critical limb ischemia or major amputation) and were identified using Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs encounters.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70.6 years; 97.3% were male, and 18.5% self-identified as Black. The mean ankle-brachial index value was 0.78 (SD: 0.26) and the mean toe-brachial index value was 0.51 (SD: 0.19). A majority of patients were current (27.1%) or former (30.0%) smokers. Prevalence of hypertension (86.6%), heart failure (22.7%), diabetes (54.8%), chronic kidney disease (23.6%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (35.4%) was high. At 1 year, 9.4% of patients had died. The 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events was 5.6 per 100 patient-years and limb events was 7.0 per 100 patient-years.

CONCLUSIONS

We have successfully launched a registry of >100 000 patients with a new diagnosis of PAD in the Veterans Health Administration, the largest integrated health system in the United States. The incidence of death and clinical events in our cohort is high. Ongoing studies will yield important insights regarding improving care and outcomes in this high-risk group.

2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2025 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2024 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. This year's edition includes a continued focus on health equity across several key domains and enhanced global data that reflect improved methods and incorporation of ≈3000 new data sources since last year's Statistical Update.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Markers of optimal medical therapy are associated with improved limb outcomes after elective revascularization for intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND

Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is a modifiable factor that decreases mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. We hypothesized that preintervention OMT would be associated with improved 1-year reintervention and major adverse limb event (MALE) rates after elective endovascular revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC).

METHODS

Using the Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2020), we identified patients with IC undergoing elective endovascular, hybrid, and open surgical interventions. Preoperative antiplatelet, statin, and nonsmoking status defined OMT components and created three groups: complete (all components), partial (1-2 components), and no OMT. The primary outcome was 1-year reintervention. Secondary outcomes included MALE and factors associated with OMT usage. Multivariable logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

RESULTS

There were 39,088 patients (14,907 [38.1%] complete, 22,054 [56.4%)] partial, 2127 [5.4%] no OMT) who met our criteria. Patients with any OMT were more frequently older with more cardiovascular diseases and diabetes (P < .0001). Patients without OMT were more likely to be Black or with Medicare or Medicaid (P < .05). Observed 1-year reintervention (5.3% complete OMT, 6.1% partial OMT, 8.3% no OMT; P < .001) and MALE (5.6% complete OMT, 6.3% partial OMT, 8.8% no OMT; P < .001) were decreased by partial or complete OMT compared with no OMT. Complete OMT significantly decreased the adjusted odds of reintervention and MALE by 28% (aOR, 0.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59-0.88) and 30% (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85), respectively, compared with no OMT. Partial OMT decrease the adjusted odds of reintervention and MALE by 24% (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92) and 26% (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preintervention OMT is an underused, modifiable risk factor associated with improved 1-year reintervention and MALE. Vascular surgeons are uniquely positioned to initiate and maintain OMT in patients with IC before revascularization to optimize patient outcomes.

Descriptive Analysis of Types and Diagnoses Associated with Lower Extremity Amputation: Analysis of the US Veterans Health Administration Database 2019-2023

INTRODUCTION

Veterans in the US have higher rates of lower extremity amputation (LEA) compared to the general population and these rates have increased between 2008 and 2018. There is limited data which directly evaluate the potential underlying comorbidities associated with LEA in the veterans' population especially with the most recent data. Such information is critical to help inform clinical management strategies to reduce the risk of amputations among our veterans.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of adults in the Veterans Health Administration database who underwent LEA from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023. The date of the first LEA procedure was defined as the index date. Index LEA type, patient demographic at baseline, and clinical characteristics (including diagnoses for conditions associated with LEA and other comorbidities) 1 year before and 30 days after the index LEA procedure (except for bacterial infections which the identification period was 30 days before and 30 days after the index LEA procedure) were described.

RESULTS

Of the 27,134 Veterans with LEA, 67.3% were ≥ 65 years of age, 97.0% were male, and 65.3% were non-Hispanic white. The most common type of LEA was transmetatarsal (52.9%), followed by toe (21.9%), above-knee (15.4%), and below-knee (9.8%). The most prevalent diagnoses associated with LEA were diabetes (81.6%), bacterial infections (79.1%), and peripheral artery disease (PAD; 63.3%). Only 15 Veterans (< 0.1%) had a diagnosis for combat-related injuries to lower extremities.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes and PAD are highly prevalent and among the main conditions associated with LEA among US Veterans. Earlier and more effective preventative and clinical management of these conditions offer an opportunity to significantly reduce the rates of LEA in this population.

[Vascular rehabilitation for patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease]

Compared to patients with coronary heart disease, patients with PAD have a poorer attitude towards general practitioners with regard to the frequency of prescribing rehabilitative measures and controlling risk factors. The patients themselves do not perceive the increased cardiovascular risk and thus the need for lifestyle changes and compliance to the same extent as patients with coronary heart disease.The "Rehabilitation clinic with vascular expertise" certificate defines the criteria for fulfilling the specific structural and process requirements for vascular medicine.Due to the paradigm shift and the increasing importance of conservative therapy for patients with intermittent claudication, vascular rehabilitation can be the start of or support for the implementation of conservative therapy and thus ensure long-term patient compliance with regard to the implementation of drug therapy, lifestyle changes and the sustainability of gait training. For hospitalized patients, vascular rehabilitation closes the gap to more sustainable aftercare.Increasing demand will promote the development of vascular medical rehabilitation and increase awareness on the part of payers. This process is being scientifically monitored.The goal should be a care structure for patients with PAD that is regulated on an outpatient basis as part of a separate or adapted DMP program, that includes the quality standards of the "Interdisciplinary Vascular Centers" on an inpatient basis and that includes vascular medical rehabilitation with subordinate vascular sports groups.From the point of view of rehabilitation, the aim is for vascular rehabilitation to be recognized as an independent specialist area by the payers.

Racial and Socioeconomic Health Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive atherosclerotic disease that causes lower extremity arterial stenosis or occlusion. Patients with PAD are at increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, limitations in ambulation, and amputation. Despite the advances in medicine and technology, the outcomes from PAD, including critical limb-threatening ischemia, acute limb ischemia amputation, and mortality, remain increased among specific racial and ethnic groups that have been historically marginalized in America, including Black, Hispanic, and American Indian individuals in the United States when compared with White persons. The purpose of this review is to summarize PAD literature that incorporates racial and ethnic disparities in PAD. There are a rising number of studies focused on the interface of racial and ethnic disparities and PAD. The majority of these studies are specifically focused on Black race, whereas there are limited studies focused on other minoritized racial and ethnic groups in the United States. The application of race and ethnicity has also been shown to play a synergistic role with socioeconomic status on PAD outcomes. Effective strategies focused on implementing policies that support quality measures and focus on social determinants of health have been shown to promote health equity and reduce disparities. Current evidence suggests that biological differences are less likely to be the leading cause of disparities in PAD between racial and ethnic groups compared with White Americans and supports a renewed focus on social determinants of health to achieve health equity.

Antithrombotic therapy following lower extremity endovascular revascularization: The results of a survey of vascular specialists

Objective

Antithrombotic therapy improves endovascular intervention outcomes for peripheral artery disease. However, there are limited data guiding the choice and duration of these adjuvant therapies. Thus, we explored current antithrombotic prescribing preferences among vascular interventionalists, hypothesizing that there are varied and inconsistent treatment practices among providers.

Methods

We developed and distributed a de-identified RedCap survey via Twitter and email to Vascular Quality Initiative members (February 2023). Multiple-choice questions queried antithrombotic agents and treatment durations for a clinical vignette (a claudicant on 81 mg aspirin and statin) with different arterial disease locations (iliac, femoropopliteal, or tibial vessels) and different revascularization strategies (angioplasty or stenting, with and without drug-coating). Antithrombotic options included monotherapies with antiplatelet agents or low-dose rivaroxaban; dual therapies with aspirin combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor (dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT) or low-dose rivaroxaban (dual pathway inhibition or DPI); or triple therapy with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and low-dose rivaroxaban. Options for therapy duration included 30, 90, 180, and 365 days, or indefinitely.

Results

There were 199 respondents (17% female, 68% White race, 63% academic, 88% vascular surgery). Across all treatment scenarios, respondents selected DAPT (n = 171/199; 86%) in at least one revascularization scenario, followed by aspirin monotherapy (n = 83/199; 42%) and DPI (n = 49/199; 25%). Therapy choice did differ by both anatomic location and revascularization strategy (P < .05). DAPT was most selected following femoropopliteal revascularization (n = 165/199, 83%) and bare metal stenting (n = 162/198, 82%). However, aspirin monotherapy was most selected following iliac level revascularization (n = 52/197; 26%) and following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty at any level (n = 51/182; 28%). DPI was most selected following tibial revascularization (n = 39/184; 21%) and following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 38/182; 21%). Among those who selected DAPT, the 90-day (n = 99/171; 58%) duration was preferred. Those who selected DPI favored indefinite treatment durations (n = 34/49; 69%). Indefinite DAPT and DPI therapy were more commonly selected for distal level revascularization (P < .05). Rivaroxaban utilization was limited secondary to cost (n = 108/178; 61%), lack of demonstrated effectiveness (n = 75/178; 42%), and concern for safety and bleeding (n = 27/178; 15%).

Conclusions

Following lower extremity endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease, a 90-day duration of DAPT remains the most commonly selected antithrombotic regimen despite the emergence of DPI as an evidence-based antithrombotic therapy. The variability in provider preferred antithrombotic agent and treatment duration emphasizes the need for high-quality evidence for the medical optimization of revascularization outcomes.

Contemporary Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Endovascular Revascularization of Acute Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Acute limb ischemia is a vascular emergency associated with high rates of limb loss and mortality. As the use of endovascular techniques increases, estimation of rates and predictors of adverse outcomes remains needed.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess contemporary outcomes and predictors of adverse events following endovascular treatment of acute limb ischemia in a nationwide, multicenter registry.

METHODS

Patients who had peripheral vascular intervention performed for the indication of acute limb ischemia in National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Intervention Registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major amputation during index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of the composite outcome.

RESULTS

There were 3,541 endovascular procedures performed during the study period. Of these, 132 (3.7%) resulted in death, and 77 (2.2%) resulted in amputation during hospitalization. Thrombolysis catheters were used in 27.7% (n = 981) and thrombectomy catheters in 3.9% (n = 138). Independent predictors of death or amputation included severe lung disease (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.17-2.52), Rutherford Class IIb (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.62-3.65), and end-stage renal disease (OR: 3.94; 95% CI: 0.73-0.85), and preprocedure hemoglobin (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73- 0.85). Complications included bleeding within 72 hours of intervention (6.7%) and thrombosis (2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pre-existing medical comorbidities and those with diminished limb viability were more likely to suffer adverse outcomes. Adverse event rates remain high for patients affected by acute limb ischemia despite its declining incidence.

Accuracy of ankle-brachial index in screening for peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes

Although the ankle-brachial index (ABI) presents overall satisfactory accuracy, its sensitivity in the context of screening strategies does not ensure the detection of all individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), especially in clinical situations where there is calcification of the arterial media layer. This study evaluated the accuracy of ABI in screening PAD among individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a community setting. An observational study included only individuals with DM. ABI measurement was performed, and the lower limb duplex ultrasound (DU) was used as the reference standard for PAD diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) of ABI were assessed. The analysis included 194 limbs from 99 participants, with a PAD prevalence identified by DU of 15.98%. ABI demonstrated an accuracy of 87.63%, with a sensitivity of 35.48%, specificity of 97.55%, PPV of 73.33%, NPV of 89.83%, LR+ of 14.46, and LR- of 0.66. ABI showed high specificity but limited sensitivity in detecting PAD among individuals with DM in a community setting. An LR- of 0.66 suggests that a normal ABI result reduces but does not eliminate the possibility of PAD, highlighting the importance of complementary diagnostic approaches to enhance accuracy in identifying PAD in high-risk patients, such as those with DM. Incorporating additional diagnostic methods may be necessary to improve the effectiveness of PAD screening in this group.

Medical Optimization of Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD.

Educating Trainees to Treat Peripheral Arterial Disease: Challenges and Opportunities

Educating trainees to treat Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) carries specific contemporary challenges. The national increase of the prevalence of PAD combined with a significant shortage of vascular surgeons creates a need for concern for future management of this complex disease. Over the past 2 decades, traditional (5 + 2) and integrated (0 + 5) paradigms have fostered trainee annual growth and comparable case distribution and volumes in endovascular and open surgical treatment options have been maintained. Close evaluation into not only the absolute numbers of surgical cases, but the level of trainee involvement in each logged case is recommended. Future implementation of the Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) modules will hopefully assist in ensuring linear development of surgical skill and judgment. Additionally, advances in individual and systems level techniques to enhance skill acquisition in the form of "off-the job training" and simulation-based training may provide an enhancement to traditional technical training methods. Finally, the possibility and role of artificial intelligence in vascular surgery skill training must not be ignored, but carefully explored and utilized to modernize cognitive and technical skill preparation for trainees in the and delivery of care for PAD patients. Overall, the training residents for the treatment of PAD patients will be associated with new challenges that vascular surgery must embrace and surmount to advance our specialty.

Evaluation of nontarget lesions in femoropopliteal disease using near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging

BACKGROUND

In coronary artery disease (CAD), lipid-core-containing plaque (LCP) in nontarget lesions detected using near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) was related to increased major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CAD. In the endovascular therapy field, few previous studies using NIRS-IVUS revealed the presence of LCPs in severe stenotic lesions of femoropopliteal disease.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the plaque morphology of nontarget lesions, especially LCPs, and compare it with that of target lesions using NIRS-IVUS in patients with femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

This single-center prospective observational study included 14 patients who underwent endovascular therapy for FP disease. NIRS-IVUS assessment was performed on the entire FP arterial segment. Forty-one LCP lesions with a maximum lipid-core burden index in any 4-mm region (max LCBI4mm) > 100 were detected using NIRS-IVUS. We evaluated the patient and lesion characteristics. LCP lesions were divided into the target (n = 18) and nontarget (n = 23) lesion groups for comparison.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were notable for advanced age (76.8 ± 6.6 years); high proportion of males (78.7%); and high incidence of hypertension (100%), dyslipidemia (78.6%), diabetes (64.3%). Regarding NIRS findings, the target lesion group exhibited a significantly smaller proportion of LCPs concerning the lesion length (25.9 ± 15.7% vs. 50.6 ± 29.2%, p = 0.002) than the nontarget lesion group. Conversely, there were no significant differences in the value of max LCBI4mm (284.4 ± 153.4 vs. 289.5 ± 113.1, p = 0.90), length of LCP lesion (9.8 ± 9.7 mm vs. 10.7 ± 6.9 mm, p = 0.74), and distribution of LCPs (p = 0.08) between the groups. In addition, the number of LCPs in the target FP artery positively correlated with max LCBI4mm in the target FP artery (r = 0.671, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

NIRS-IVUS findings demonstrated the presence of LCPs in nontarget lesions in patients with FP disease. Moreover, the abundance of LCPs in nontarget lesions was similar to that in target lesions in FP disease.

Non-surgical interventions for preventing contralateral tissue loss and amputation in dysvascular patients with a primary major lower limb amputation

RATIONALE

Major lower limb amputation (LLA, above the ankle) is performed for people with intractable pain, life-threatening infections, or non-functional limbs. Of 7500 LLAs carried out in England between 2015 and 2018, the majority of these were performed in dysvascular patients. Dysvascularity is the absence of adequate blood supply to maintain a limb's usual function (ischaemia, usually caused by peripheral arterial disease or diabetes mellitus), ultimately leading to pain and tissue injury (ulcers, gangrene, sometimes referred to as tissue loss). Among those who undergo dysvascular LLA, 5.7% and 11.5% will likely undergo contralateral LLA at one and five years respectively, which is associated with greater disability and lower likelihood of returning to work, increasing the psychological burden to the patient and socioeconomic cost to the patient and health service. While extensive research has been carried out in the management of peripheral arterial disease and the care of diabetic feet, there are no guidelines for practice on prevention of contralateral amputation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of non-surgical interventions versus placebo, no intervention, or other non-surgical interventions on contralateral limb (CLL) tissue loss and amputation in dysvascular patients with a primary major LLA.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PEDro databases and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers until 20 March 2023. We also checked the references of identified studies and contacted study authors and manufacturers of relevant products.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We aimed to include all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs (e.g. randomised by birthdate) comparing the effectiveness of a non-surgical intervention with placebo, no intervention, or other non-surgical intervention, in adults with a primary major LLA due to dysvascularity. Interventions could be physical, pharmacological, educational, behavioural, or organisational, and delivered by a healthcare professional or carer.

OUTCOMES

Our critical and important outcomes of interest were as follows. Critical outcomes • Incidence of new localised tissue injury or ulceration (tissue loss) of the CLL, regardless of stage or classification at given time points. • Time to the development of any localised tissue injury or ulceration (tissue loss) of the CLL, regardless of stage or classification. • Incidence of new minor amputation (through the ankle, foot, or toe(s)) of the CLL at given time points. • Time to new minor amputation (through the ankle, foot, or toe(s)) of the CLL. • Incidence of new major amputation (whole limb or partial limb, above the ankle) of the CLL at given time points. • Time to new major amputation (whole limb or partial limb, above the ankle) of the CLL. Important outcomes • Survival (time to death from all causes) at 12 months. • Patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using validated scales such as the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and EQ-5D. • Adverse events (e.g. infections in the CLL). • Hospital readmission.

RISK OF BIAS

We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool to assess risk of bias in the included study.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We were only able to perform a narrative review due to lack of data. We reported risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We found one eligible study, which compared electrostimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle and standard rehabilitation against standard rehabilitation in 50 dysvascular amputees.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

There was no new incidence of tissue loss reported. The following outcomes were not reported: time to new tissue loss; time to and incidence of minor amputation; HRQoL outcomes; adverse events; and hospital readmissions. Electrostimulation was associated with a three-fold reduction in the incidence of new major amputation of the CLL (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.99), although time to new major amputation was not reported. There was no difference between groups in 12-month survival (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.18). We judged the overall certainty of the evidence (GRADE) as very low across all outcomes, with unclear risk of selection and detection bias and high risk of performance bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the care of the CLL being identified as a key research priority by two separate consensus papers, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to address this priority to date. We found only a single RCT suitable for inclusion, and this study was subject to risk of bias. Contralateral limb outcomes should be recorded in future research on dysvascular amputees. Until better evidence and clearer recommendations are available, this topic is likely to remain a research priority.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Protocol available via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013857.

Long-term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease In Veterans: Analysis of the PEripheral ARtery Disease Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS)

Background

Contemporary research in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains limited due to lack of a national registry and low accuracy of diagnosis codes to identify PAD patients in electronic health records.

Methods & Results

Leveraging a novel natural language processing (NLP) system that identifies PAD with high accuracy using ankle brachial index (ABI) and toe-brachial index (TBI) values, we created a registry of 103,748 patients with new onset PAD patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Study endpoints include mortality, cardiovascular (hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or stroke) and limb events (hospitalization for critical limb ischemia or major amputation) and were identified using VA and non-VA encounters. The mean age was 70.6 years; 97.3% were males, and 18.5% self-identified as Black race. The mean ABI value was 0.78 (SD: 0.26) and the mean TBI value was 0.51 (SD: 0.19). Nearly one-third (32.4%) patients were currently smoking and 35.4% formerly smoked. Prevalence of hypertension (86.6%), heart failure (22.7%), diabetes (54.8%), renal failure (23.6%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (35.4%) was high. At 1-year, 9.4% of patients had died. The 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events was 5.6 per 100 patient-years and limb events was 4.5 per 100 patient-years.

Conclusions

We have successfully launched a registry of >100,000 patients with a new diagnosis of PAD in the VHA, the largest integrated health system in the U.S. The ncidence of death and clinical events in our cohort is high. Ongoing studies will yield important insights regarding improving care and outcomes in this high-risk group.

Outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with dyslipidemia in the BIOLUX P-III registry: A subgroup analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term outcomes of the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) to treat infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS

BIOLUX P-III is a prospective, international, multicenter, all-comers registry-based study that was conducted at 44 sites with follow-ups at 6, 12 and 24 months. The present study is a subgroup analysis comparing the outcomes associated with endovascular revascularization with those associated with Passeo-18 lux DCBs in patients with and without dyslipidemia. The proportions of patients free from major adverse events (defined as device- or procedure-related mortality within 30 days, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and major target limb amputation), target vessel revascularization, and patient-reported outcomes within 24 months postintervention were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 876 patients with symptomatic PAD who underwent peripheral revascularization with DCBs and had information on their dyslipidemia status were included; 588 of those patients had dyslipidemia. There was no difference in the proportion of patients free from MAEs between the groups. The percentages of patients who were 6, 12 and 24 months free from CD-TLR were significantly lower in the dyslipidemia group than in the nondyslipidemia group (86.3% vs 91.9% at 2 years, p = .0183). Similarly, the percentage of patients free from target vessel revascularization was lower in the dyslipidemia group at all timepoints (83.3% vs 89.3% at 2 years, p = .0203). There was no difference in mortality or major or minor limb amputation rates. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to those without dyslipidemia, patients with symptomatic PAD and dyslipidemia who underwent revascularization with a Passeo-18 lux DCB had greater rates of CD-TLR and TVR. However, having dyslipidemia did not increase the risk of mortality or limb amputation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02276313.

Association between statin intensity and femoropopliteal stent primary patency in peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Statins are widely used in coronary and peripheral arterial disease, but their impact on patency of stents placed for peripheral arterial disease is not well-studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate femoropopliteal stent primary patency according to statin intensity at the time of stent placement and compare this effect to other covariates that may influence stent patency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review identified 278 discrete femoropopliteal stent constructs placed in 216 patients over a 10-year period; Rutherford categories were 2 (3.6%), 3 (12.9%), 4 (21.2%), 5 (49.6%), and 6 (12.6%). Stent locations were common femoral (1.8%), common femoral/superficial femoral (0.7%), superficial femoral (50.7%), superficial femoral/popliteal (32.7%) and popliteal (14.0%) arteries; 63.3% of stents were paclitaxel-eluting. Primary patency of each stent construct was determined with duplex ultrasound, angiography, or computed tomographic angiography. Greater than 50% restenosis or stent occlusion was considered loss of patency. Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier modeling were used to assess the effect of statin use and additional covariates on stent patency.

RESULTS

Patients on any statin at the time of stent placement were half as likely to undergo loss of primary unassisted patency as patients on no statin therapy (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.87; P = .004). Moderate/high intensity statin therapy conferred 17 additional months of median stent patency compared to the no statin group. Antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, drug-eluting stents (versus bare metal or covered stents), and Rutherford class were not predictive of stent patency (P = 0.52, 0.85, 0.58, and 0.82, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of statin therapy at the time of femoropopliteal stent placement was the most predictive examined variable influencing primary unassisted patency.

Randomized Trial of a Vascular Care Team vs Education for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Underutilization of therapies to reduce ischemic risk in peripheral artery disease (PAD) persists.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose was to conduct an implementation trial of lipid management in vascular disease.

METHODS

The OPTIMIZE PAD-1 (Implementation of Vascular Care Team to Improve Medical Management of PAD Patients) trial randomized patients with peripheral artery disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 mg/dL to management via a vascular care team including a clinical pharmacist and an algorithm of intensive lipid management to achieve goal LDL-C in 1 step vs usual care plus provider education. Medications were obtained using commercial insurance. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C at 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 166 enrolled patients, 74.2% did not have an LDL-C level at goal. Among 114 randomized patients (mean age 66 years, 36.0% women, and 15.8% Black), 50.9% received high-intensity statin, and 7.9% received ezetimibe at baseline. The mean 12-month LDL-C change was -49.1% (95% CI: -58.7% to -39.5%) with vascular care team management and -5.4% (95% CI: -15.3% to 4.6%) with usual care; the between-group least-squares mean difference was -43.7% (95% CI: -57.6% to -29.9%; P < 0.0001). Mean LDL-C was reduced in vascular care team patients from 100.6 mg/dL at baseline to 54.8 and 50.1 mg/dL by week 4 and month 12, respectively. At 12 months, vascular care team patients were >3 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 8 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <55 mg/dL (P < 0.0001) than usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

OPTIMIZE PAD-1 showed that an interprofessional, algorithm-based program can achieve rapid LDL-C lowering in vascular patients using available insurance and therapies, and LDL-C targets can be met in most patients if enabled by optimized systems of care.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Specificities of primary and secondary prevention of lower extremity artery disease: introduction to a series of reviews

This article briefly discusses the risk factors for the development of lower extremity artery disease, namely smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia/dyslipidemia and hypertension. Each of these risk factors will be discussed in detail in forthcoming articles of the journal.

Appropriate care in chronic limb threatening ischemia: A review of current evidence and outcomes

Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses a significant treatment challenge for vascular surgeons, interventionalists, podiatrists, and associated medical specialists. The evidence for what constitutes appropriate care is rapidly evolving and new treatment options are in constant development. This review examines the current guidelines for CLTI care, as well as reported outcomes for multiple care strategies in this patient population, including revascularization and medical optimization. We performed a literature review of the PubMed database, reviewing articles that reported outcomes for CLTI care between 2000 and 2023, and described these outcomes as they relate to the current state of CLTI treatment. Significant data are still forthcoming regarding CLTI care, but widespread adoption of appropriate CLTI care is essential for the treatment of this vulnerable population.

Variability in guideline-directed medical therapy across sites and operators and long-term mortality and amputation outcomes risk in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions

BACKGROUND

The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) decreases the risk of death and amputation and may decrease hospital readmissions. The variability of GDMT prescription across sites and operators and the proportionality of risk is not well understood. We aimed to study the association between variability of GDMT prescription at the site and operator level and outcomes (including 90-day readmissions and 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation).

METHODS

We examined GDMT discharge rates in PVIs performed between 2017 and 2018 using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry. GDMT included a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-i/ARB) if hypertensive. Quartiles (Q1-4) of GDMT rates were documented by operators and sites and variability was quantified using median odds ratios (MOR) and intraclass correlation (ICC). The association between lower GDMT rates (per 10%) by sites and operators with 90-day readmission were calculated using logistic regression, and with 24-month mortality and major amputation using parametric survival model. Models were adjusted for patient-level factors and included sites and operators nested within sites as 2 random effects.

RESULTS

GDMT rates for 17,147 patients across 223 sites and 1,263 operators ranged from 0% to 38% (Q1, MOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.39-1.47, P ≤ .001) to 57%-100% (Q4, MOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.44-1.51, P ≤ .001). Four percent of variance in GDMT use was explained by sites (ICC 3.9, 95%CI 2.9-5.3) and operators (ICC 4.1, 95%CI 3.1-5.4). A dose-response relationship was noted between lower GDMT rates and increased risk of 90-day readmission risk by sites (P = .021) and operators (P < .001). Lower GDMT prescription by site was associated with higher risk of 24-month mortality (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.13) and major amputation (HR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.01-1.15). Similar associations were found for GDMT use by provider (mortality HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.08 and amputation HR = 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08).

CONCLUSION

Both at the operator and health system level, there was significant variability in GDMT prescription following PVI, proportionally translating into risk for readmission, mortality, and major amputation. Targeted quality efforts should prioritize both operator and site levels to improve GDMT use and outcomes for patients undergoing PVI.

Evidence for clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications among adults with peripheral artery disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines recommend that adults with peripheral artery disease (PAD) be prescribed antiplatelet, statin and antihypertensive medications. However, it is unclear how often people with PAD are underprescribed these drugs, which characteristics predict clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications, and whether underprescription and non-adherence are associated with adverse health and health system outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews from 2006 onwards. Two investigators will independently review abstracts and full-text studies. We will include studies that enrolled adults and reported the incidence and/or prevalence of clinician underprescription of or patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications among people with PAD; adjusted risk factors for underprescription of/non-adherence to these medications; and adjusted associations between underprescription/non-adherence to these medications and outcomes. Outcomes will include mortality, major adverse cardiac and limb events (including revascularisation procedures and amputations), other reported morbidities, healthcare resource use and costs. Two investigators will independently extract data and evaluate study risk of bias. We will calculate summary estimates of the incidence and prevalence of clinician underprescription/patient non-adherence across studies. We will also conduct subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression to determine if estimates vary by country, characteristics of the patients and treating clinicians, population-based versus non-population-based design, and study risks of bias. Finally, we will calculate pooled adjusted risk factors for underprescription/non-adherence and adjusted associations between underprescription/non-adherence and outcomes. We will use Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine estimate certainty.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required as we are studying published data. This systematic review will synthesise existing evidence regarding clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications in adults with PAD. Results will be used to identify evidence-care gaps and inform where interventions may be required to improve clinician prescribing and patient adherence to prescribed medications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362801.

Lifestyle Approach and Medical Therapy of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common among patients with several risk factors, such as elderly, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Notably, PAD is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular complications. Non-invasive interventions are beneficial to improve morbidity and mortality among patients with PAD. Traditional risk factors like smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia play a significant role in the development of PAD. Still, additional factors such as mental health, glycemic control, diet, exercise, obesity management, lipid-lowering therapy, and antiplatelet therapy have emerged as important considerations. Managing these factors can help improve outcomes and reduce complications in PAD patients. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel is recommended in PAD patients, with clopidogrel showing more significant benefits in symptomatic PAD individuals. Managing several risk factors is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications in patients with PAD. Further research is also needed to explore the potential benefits of novel therapies. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to PAD management is essential for improving morbidity and mortality among patients with this condition.

The Pink Tax: Sex and Gender Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease associated with significant functional impairment, morbidity, and mortality. Among women, PAD remains poorly recognized and undermanaged. Compared with men, women with PAD tend to be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, have poorer quality of life, and experience higher rates of PAD-related morbidity and cardiovascular mortality. In this review, we describe the sex- and gender-related differences in the epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and management of PAD. We provide specific recommendations to overcome these factors, including greater awareness and an increased emphasis on tailored and more aggressive interventions for women with PAD. Such changes are warranted and necessary to achieve more equitable outcomes in women with PAD, including improved limb outcomes, enhanced lifestyle, and cardiovascular risk reduction.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

The Complex Mechanisms and the Potential Effects of Statins on Vascular Calcification: A Narrative Review

Vascular calcification (VC) is a complex process of calcium deposition on the arterial wall and atherosclerotic plaques and involves interaction between vascular smooth muscle cells, inflammatory and VC mediators. The latter are independent predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and potential targets of pharmaceutical therapy. This paper is a narrative review of the complex mechanisms of VC development and in this context the potential anti-atherosclerotic effects of statins. At the initial stages of atherosclerosis VC correlates with atherosclerosis burden and in the long-term with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A plethora of animal and clinical studies have proposed statins as the cornerstone of primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Based on coronary computed tomography data, high doses of statins may have negligible or even positive effects on the progression of coronary artery calcification. Growing data support an increase in atherosclerotic plaque calcification in peripheral arteries (e.g., carotids), after long-term, statin-therapy. Despite the paradox of increasing VC, those effects of statins have been associated with higher plaque stability, reducing the risk of consequent adverse events. Statins seem to promote a "favorable" atherosclerotic calcification, suppressing atherosclerotic lesion expansion and their vulnerability. More studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

2024 TSOC/TSPS Joint Consensus: Strategies for Advanced Vascular Wound Management in Arterial and Venous Diseases

The Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and Taiwan Society of Plastic Surgery (TSPS) have collaborated to develop a joint consensus for the management of patients with advanced vascular wounds. The taskforce comprises experts including preventive cardiologists, interventionists, and cardiovascular and plastic surgeons. The consensus focuses on addressing the challenges in diagnosing, treating, and managing complex wounds; incorporates the perfusion evaluation and the advanced vascular wound care team; and highlights the importance of cross-disciplinary teamwork. The aim of this joint consensus is to manage patients with advanced vascular wounds and encourage the adoption of these guidelines by healthcare professionals to improve patient care and outcomes. The guidelines encompass a range of topics, including the definition of advanced vascular wounds, increased awareness, team structure, epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical treatment, endovascular intervention, vascular surgery, infection control, advanced wound management, and evaluation of treatment results. It also outlines a detailed protocol for assessing patients with lower leg wounds, provides guidance on consultation and referral processes, and offers recommendations for various wound care devices, dressings, and products. The 2024 TSOC/TSPS consensus for the management of patients with advanced vascular wounds serves as a catalyst for international collaboration, promoting knowledge exchange and facilitating advancements in the field of advanced vascular wound management. By providing a comprehensive and evidence-based approach, this consensus aims to contribute to improved patient care and outcomes globally.

Impact of guideline-directed medical therapy on 5-year mortality in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend that patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) should be treated with antithrombotic agents, renin-angiotensin-system blockers, and statins. However, the clinical impact of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on long-term mortality in patients with newly diagnosed PAD remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of GDMT and evaluate 5-year mortality according to GDMT after PAD diagnosis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, using nationwide health insurance claims data in Korea, included patients newly diagnosed with PAD between 2006 and 2015. GDMT was defined as the use of all drugs, including antithrombotic agents, renin-angiotensin-system blockers, and statins, within 3 months of PAD diagnosis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We investigated 19,561 newly diagnosed patients with PAD without proven cardiovascular disease. Among the study population, 4378 patients (22.4%) were categorized in the GDMT and 15,183 (77.6%) in the non-GDMT groups. During the 5-year follow-up, GDMT showed a lower incidence of all-cause mortality than that of non-GDMT (2.8% vs 4.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.329; 95% confidence interval, 0.257-0.421; P < .001). Even in the propensity-matched population, GDMT showed a lower mortality rate than non-GDMT (hazard ratio, 0.283; 95% confidence interval, 0.217-0.370; P < .001). As the number of guideline-recommended drugs increased, the mortality rate decreased proportionately.

CONCLUSIONS

After PAD diagnosis, GDMT was associated with a lower incidence of mortality regardless of proven cardiovascular disease. This retrospective analysis showed an insufficient prevalence of GDMT among patients with PAD in real-world practice.

Longitudinal outcomes following peripheral vascular intervention among older persons living with HIV

BACKGROUND

Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PLWH) have an increased risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in comparison to the general population. However, a gap remains in understanding optimal management for this condition. This study assesses longitudinal outcomes associated with peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for PAD among PLWH.

METHODS

All Medicare fee-for-service patients undergoing femoropopliteal artery PVI between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 were identified and stratified by HIV serostatus. The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as major amputation or arterial embolism/thrombosis following an index procedure. The subdistribution hazard was used to evaluate the association between HIV serostatus and MALE, accounting for the competing risk of death. Results were adjusted for sociodemographics and major comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 168,553 patients who underwent PVI, 357 (0.21%) were PLWH. The average age was 77.0 ± 7.6 years; 80.3% had hypertension, 70.3% had hyperlipidemia, and 24.6% had tobacco use disorder. Compared to those without HIV, PLWH were younger and had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors. MALE were substantially more frequent among PLWH, with a cumulative incidence of 24.6%, compared to 14.5% among those without HIV. The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.00-1.58, p = 0.05). The use of guideline-directed statin therapy was low in both groups in the 90 days following revascularization (57.9% in PLWH vs 58.1% in those without HIV, p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

Among US Medicare beneficiaries, PLWH had poorer long-term outcomes following PVI. Greater attention to the management of symptomatic PAD is warranted for the HIV population, particularly following revascularization.

Lower limb arterial calcification and its clinical relevance with peripheral arterial disease

Lower limb arterial calcification (LLAC) is associated with an increased risk of mortality and it predicts poor outcomes after endovascular interventions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Detailed histological analysis of human lower artery specimens pinpointed the presence of LLAC in two distinct layers: the intima and the media. Intimal calcification has been assumed to be an atherosclerotic pathology and it is associated with smoking and obesity. It becomes instrumental in lumen stenosis, thereby playing a crucial role in disease progression. On the contrary, medial calcification is a separate process, systematically regulated and linked with age advancement, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. It prominently interacts with vasodilation and arterial stiffness. Given that both types of calcifications frequently co-exist in PAD patients, it is vital to understand their respective mechanisms within the context of PAD. Calcification can be easily identifiable entity on imaging scans. Considering the highly improved abilities of novel imaging technologies in differentiating intimal and medial calcification within the lower limb arteries, this review aimed to describe the distinct histological and imaging features of the two types of LLAC. Additionally, it aims to provide in-depth insight into the risk factors, the effects on hemodynamics, and the clinical implications of LLAC, either occurring in the intimal or medial layers.

Protective Effects of Statins on Limb and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease

Background

Previous studies have reported that statins have inconsistent and marginal cardiovascular (CV) benefits in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether statins play a secondary preventive role in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and ESRD remains unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between statin users and nonusers with PAD and ESRD.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study assessed the long-term protective effects of statins using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Propensity score matching was performed according to sex, age, index year, related comorbidities, and medications. The main outcomes were limb events and major adverse CV events (MACEs).

Results

The statin user group (n = 4,460) was compared with the propensity score-matched statin nonuser group (n = 4,460). The mean age of the matched patients was 64 years, and 40% of the patients were men. The baseline characteristics of the groups were well-balanced. The overall limb event and MACE rates were not different between the two groups. However, the statin user group had lower rates of limb amputation [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.99], stroke (aHR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.83), CV death (aHR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.32-0.66), and all-cause death (aHR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.42-0.48) despite having a higher rate of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for PAD.

Conclusions

This population-based retrospective cohort study demonstrated that statin therapy was associated with a lower risk of limb amputation, nonfatal stroke, CV death, and all-cause death in patients with PAD and ESRD.

Medical Management of Cardiovascular Disease

We offer an overview of lipid lowering, antiplatelet, antihypertensive, and glucose-lowering therapies for vascular surgeons and their respective medical teams. Further reviews should offer additional guidance on smoking cessation, exercise therapy, and nutritional optimization.

Gaps in Guideline-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 322 153 Patients

BACKGROUND

Many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not on guideline-recommended statin therapy. We evaluated utilization of statins and other lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), among patients with ASCVD over a 1-year period.

METHODS

LLT and LDL-C levels at the first outpatient visit (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018) and 1-year follow-up were evaluated using data from Cerner Real-World Data, an electronic health record-derived data set from 92 US health systems. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with high-intensity statin use.

RESULTS

We identified 322 153 patients with ASCVD (median age 69 years, 58.8% men, 81.8% White). Overall, 76.1% of patients were on statins, with only 39.4% on high-intensity statins. Men were more likely to receive high-intensity statins than women (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.30-1.38]). Increasing age was associated with lower odds of statin use (odds ratio, 0.79 per 5-year increase at 60 years [95% CI, 0.78-0.81]). Patients with peripheral artery disease (odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.37-0.42]) and cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.80]) had lower odds of using high-intensity statins than those with coronary artery disease. At baseline, most patients (61.3%) had elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL), including 59.8% of those on low/moderate-intensity statins and 76.1% on no statin; only 45.3% achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL at 1 year. Nonstatin LLT use was low (ezetimibe, 4.4%; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, 0.7%). Among patients on no statin or low/moderate-intensity statin at baseline, 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively, were on high-intensity statins at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ASCVD in routine care, high-intensity statins are underutilized, and uptitration and use of nonstatin therapy are uncommon. Women, older adults, and individuals with noncardiac ASCVD are particularly undertreated. Concerted efforts are needed to address therapeutic inertia for lipid management in patients with ASCVD.

Low and High Ankle-Brachial Index Are Both Associated with Mortality in German Nursing Home Residents-The Five-Year Follow-Up of the "Allo-Study" Cohort

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We aimed to examine this relation in a population that tends to be under-represented in research on the topic. In a prospective observational cohort study, residents of 45 nursing homes in Germany were screened for pathological ankle-brachial index (ABI) and observed for five years. Of 1333 participants (median age 84 years), 55.5% had a pathological ABI (≤0.9 or >1.4) on one or both legs. 84.7% of the probands with a low ABI (indicating PAD) had no previously known PAD diagnosis. The five-year mortality was 73.0%. Mortality was higher in individuals with a pathological ABI (76.5%) than in those with a normal ABI (68.7%, p = 0.003). An ABI > 1.4 was associated with a higher mortality (79.4%) than a reduced (74.7%) or normal ABI (68.7%, p = 0.011). Pathological ABI values were associated with an increase in mortality after correction for age, sex and all recorded comorbidities, including cardiac disease. Although PAD is highly prevalent in nursing home residents, it is underdiagnosed and undertreated. In the study cohort, both high and low ABI were important predictors of mortality. PAD deserves more attention in this high-risk population.

Optimal Medical Management in Patients undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia is associated with Improved Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing medical management and risk factor modification are underutilized strategies in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), despite evidence of improved outcomes. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry is a tool to improve quality of vascular care. In this study, we used the VQI to evaluate trends in medical management in CLTI patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), and the impact of changes in management on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS).

METHODS

Patients undergoing index PVI for CLTI between 2012-2016, with at least 24-month follow-up were identified from the national VQI registry. Patient details including smoking status and medication use, OS, LS, and AFS were analyzed with linear-by-linear association, t-test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

12,370 PVI were completed in 11,466 patients. There was a significant increase in infrapopliteal interventions (29.8% → 39.0%; P < .001) and PVI performed for tissue loss (TL) (59.1% → 66.5%; P < .001). The percentage of current smokers at time of PVI decreased (36.2% → 30.7%; P = .036). At discharge, statins were initiated in 25%, aspirin in 45% and P2Y12 therapy in 58% of patients not receiving these medications prior to PVI. Over the course of follow-up, dual antiplatelet (DAPT) (41.1% → 48.0%; P < .001), ACE-inhibitor (46.2% → 51.3%; P < .001), and statin (70.4% → 77.5%; P < .001) use increased. Combined DAPT, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased from 33.6% → 39.6% (P=<.001). Significant improvement in 24-month OS and AFS was noted (OS, 90.9% → 93.7%; P = .002: AFS, 81.2% → 83.1%; P = .046) but not LS (89.6% → 89.0%; P = .83). Combined therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, statins and ACE-inhibitors was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.61; 0.39 - 0.96, P = .034). DAPT was independent predictor of improved LS (HR 0.83; 0.79 - 0.87, P < .007).

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased over the study period and was associated with improved OS and AFS. Limb salvage trends did not change significantly over time, possibly due to inclusion of patients with higher disease burden or inadequate medical management. Medical management, although improved, remained far from optimal and represents an area for continued development.

Assessing the Prevalence of Medical Optimization Therapy in Vascular Surgery Clinics

This cross-sectional study uses checklist data to assess optimal medical therapy prescribed for veterans with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common type of atherosclerotic disease of the lower extremities associated with reduced quality of life and ambulatory capacity. Major adverse cardiovascular events and limb amputations are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Optimal medical therapy is therefore critical in these patients to prevent adverse events. Risk factor modifications, including blood pressure control and smoking cessation, in addition to antithrombotic agents, peripheral vasodilators, and supervised exercise therapy are key pillars of medical therapy. Revascularization procedures represent key touch points between patients and health care providers and serve as opportunities to optimize medical therapy and improve long-term patency rates and outcomes. This review summarizes the aspects of medical therapy that all providers should be familiar with when caring for patients with PAD in the peri-revascularization period.

Impact of Statins on Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Endovascular Intervention for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy is recommended in all patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Its impact on reduction in mortality has been well-documented, yet effect on limb-specific outcomes has been less conclusive. Differences among PAD subgroups or variability of statin use may contribute to the inconsistent findings. We evaluated statin use in patients who underwent peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and its impact on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS).

METHODS

The national Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for the index PVI for CLTI during the period 2010-2016; follow-up (FU) through 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and FU status were recorded. Patients were categorized as E-Statin: statin use pre-PVI through discharge (D/C) and FU or N-Statin: No statins pre-PVI, at D/C or any time during FU. The propensity score matched model (PSM) was constructed. Groups were compared using chi-square, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 9,089 index PVI in 8,402 patients; E-Statin: 7149 index PVI in 6,591 patients; and N-Statin: 1940 index PVI in 1811 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 12 years and 58% were male. Statin use was associated with improved 3-year OS-E Statin: 92.9% ± 0.9 versus N Statin: 91.1% ± 2.2%; P = 0.003; hazard ratio (HR): Exp (B) (95% confidence interval): 0.66 (0.44-0.99); P = 0.047 and remained significant following PSM: E Statin: 95.1% ± 0.2% versus 90.8% ± 0.3%; P = 0.02; HR: 0.50 (0.27-0.92); P = 0.025. No significant differences in 3-year LS or AFS were noted between the prematched groups; LS: E Statin: 83.7% ± 0.8 versus N Statin: 84.0% ± 1.7%; P = 0.89; HR: 1.09 (0.88-1.35); P = 0.44; AFS-E Statin: 77.2% ± 1.1% versus 76.1% ± 2.5%; P = 0.17; HR: 0.97 (0.79-1.18); P = 0.74. or following PSM: AFS: 80.2% ± 2.8% vs. 74.7% ± 3.9%; P = 0.53, HR: 0.92 (0.72-1.19); P = 0.54; LS 85.3% ± 1.9% vs. 83.5% ± 2.6%; P = 0.51, HR: 1.08 (0.83-1.4); P = 0.57. Statins significantly improved LS among those with renal failure: 67.8% ± 2.6% vs. 59.7% ± 4.4%; P = 0.003; HR: 56 (0.40-0.79); P = 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins are independently associated with improved OS in patients who undergo PVI for CLTI and should be considered for all barring intolerance. Statin use was associated with improved LS in patients with end-stage renal disease. Additional research is needed in this area, particularly, the impact of statin therapy in high-risk CLTI subgroups.

Epidemiology and Outcome of Nontraumatic Lower Limb Amputations

BACKGROUND

In order to create a solid evidence base for the development of improved management methods, this study was performed to describe the epidemiology and outcome of nontraumatic lower limb amputations (LLAs).

METHODS

This descriptive case series was conducted over a period of 4 years. It included all patients of both sexes and all ages who underwent LLAs for nontraumatic indications.

RESULTS

There were a total of 217 patients with 136 (62.67%) men and 81(37.32%) women. The age range was 7 to 71 years, with a mean of 54.25 ± 11.49 years. The most common indication for amputation (41.47%) was diabetic foot gangrene. The most common level of amputation (48.29%) was below knee amputation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetic foot gangrene, malignant tumors, and chronic neuropathic ulcers with osteomyelitis constituted the bulk of the amputees. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension were the commonest comorbidities identified among them. Public awareness and education would ensure prompt and early health seeking at the appropriate time and help to prevent the need for major amputations in many instances. The amputees' improved reintegration into society and ability to become contributing members of society would be ensured by the provision of vigorous rehabilitation.

Lower-limb peripheral arterial disease and amputations in people with diabetes: Risk factors, prognostic value and management

Lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD), is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis, resulting from a partial or complete obstruction of at least one lower-limb arteries. PAD is a major endemic disease with an excess risk of major cardiovascular events and death. It also leads to disability, high rates of lower-limb adverse events and non-traumatic amputation. In patients with diabetes, PAD is particularly frequent and has a worse prognosis than in patients without diabetes. The risk factors of PAD are comparable to those for cardiovascular disease. The ankle-brachial index is usually recommended to screen PAD despite its limited performance in patients with diabetes, affected by the presence of peripheral neuropathy, medial arterial calcification, incompressible arteries and infection. Toe brachial index and toe pressure emerge as alternative screening tools. The management of PAD requires strict control of cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, the use of antiplatelet agents and lifestyle management, to reduce cardiovascular adverse events, but few randomized controlled trials have evaluated the benefits of these treatments in PAD. Several advances have been achieved in endovascular and surgical revascularization procedures, with obvious improvement in PAD prognosis. Further studies are required to increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of PAD and to evaluate the interest of different therapeutic strategies in the occurrence and progression of PAD in patients with diabetes. Here, we present a narrative and contemporary review to synthesize the key epidemiology findings, screening and diagnosis methods, and major therapeutic advances regarding PAD in patients with diabetes.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2023 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2022 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. The American Heart Association strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) publications, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Long-Term Mortality and Amputation Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions

BACKGROUND

Lack of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) may increase mortality and amputation risk.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to study the association between GDMT and mortality/amputation and to examine GDMT variability among providers and health systems.

METHODS

We performed an observational study using patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry undergoing PVI between 2017 and 2018. Two-year all-cause mortality and major amputation data were derived from Medicare claims data. Compliance with GDMT was defined as receiving a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker if hypertensive. Propensity 1:1 matching was applied for GDMT vs no GDMT and survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Of 15,891 patients undergoing PVIs, 48.8% received GDMT and 6,120 patients in each group were matched. Median follow-up was 9.6 (IQR: 4.5-16.2) months for mortality and 8.4 (IQR: 3.5-15.4) for amputation. Mean age was 72.0 ± 9.9 years. Mortality risk was higher among patients who did not receive GDMT versus those on GDMT (31.2% vs 24.5%; HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25-1.50; P < 0.001), as well as, risk of amputation (16.0% vs 13.2%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.35; P < 0.001). GDMT rates across sites and providers ranging from 0% to 100%, with lower performance translating into higher risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-half of the patients receiving PVI in this national quality registry were not on GDMT, and this was associated with increased risk of mortality and major amputation. Quality improvement efforts in vascular care should focus on GDMT in patients undergoing PVI.