Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: Challenges and Solutions

AF is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, with a large preponderance in the older (>75 years) adult population. Stroke is the most feared complication of AF, with huge corresponding morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation is the mainstay for stroke prevention in AF, but is commonly underutilised in clinical practice due to the fear of intracerebral bleeding. Bleeding is the primary concern in older patients with conventional vitamin K antagonist use. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used for a decade in clinical practice and have been found to reduce major bleeds. The advantages of DOAC use in older patients include obviating the need for intermittent international normalised ratio monitoring, fewer drug interactions and reduction in intracerebral haemorrhage. The disadvantages of DOAC use include older patients having to take multiple doses per day and a lack of a universal antidote, as opposed to vitamin K antagonists. However, a lack of head-to-head trials among DOACs and specific randomised controlled trials in older patients preclude a definite conclusion regarding the ideal DOAC that should be used in the older population. Factor XI inhibition is an emerging approach for oral anticoagulation that holds promise for dissociating thrombosis from haemostasis. This provides an additional avenue for reducing bleeding in the older adult population.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Apixaban in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Haemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Apixaban is increasingly being used for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease with atrial fibrillation undergoing haemodialysis, but no pharmacostatistical model is available for dosage adjustment. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of apixaban in these patients to characterise its dialytic clearance and determine optimal dosing regimens and discontinuation timing before surgery.

METHODS

Patients received 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily for 9 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily for 8 days after a 5-day washout period (NCT02672709). Apixaban concentrations were measured on and off dialysis. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using parametric and non-parametric methods. Simulations were performed to assess plasmatic exposure and the time to reach clinically relevant apixaban concentrations after treatment discontinuation for seven dosing regimens and 13 dialysis schedules.

RESULTS

A total of 289 apixaban concentrations were measured, including 85 during haemodialysis. The best model was a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Dialytic clearance was estimated at 1.20 L/h with high inter-individual variability. Apixaban daily exposure was proportional to the total daily dose, independent of dosing frequency and dialysis timing. The standard discontinuation period of 48-72 h before surgery was insufficient to achieve clinically negligible concentrations in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the first pharmacokinetic model to characterise apixaban clearance in patients with end-stage kidney disease with atrial fibrillation undergoing haemodialysis. Simulations suggest that dialysis timing is not critical for monitoring apixaban, and the discontinuation period before surgery should be extended beyond current recommendations.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With ESRD and Kidney Transplantation

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has significantly increased because major medical organizations endorse their role for conditions in which anticoagulation is indicated. Owing to important pharmacokinetic properties, the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban requires careful consideration in at-risk populations such as those with kidney disease. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban undergo some degree of renal elimination, and thus total drug exposure is increased in patients with renal insufficiency and/or those undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). The available clinical trial and real-world data in this population suggests that apixaban is likely at least comparably effective as warfarin at preventing thromboembolic events and is likely safer when evaluating bleeding risk. Rivaroxaban data is more limited, and the reported results are more discordant. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban have been used successfully in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing kidney transplant listing as well as in the posttransplant setting. Prospective clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban in various conditions where anticoagulation is indicated should include patients with ESRD and kidney transplant recipients to help further define the role that these important novel agents should play in these complex patient populations.

Efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulant therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including atrial fibrillation, which usually requires anticoagulant therapy. The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with CKD remain insufficiently studied, particularly in the more advanced stages.

METHODS

This systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023410192), adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in CKD patients. Major databases were searched, and studies were selected based on strict inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with a total of 465,673 CKD patients were included. Direct oral anticoagulants showed a significant reduction in major bleeding events compared to vitamin K antagonists (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.49-0.79, p < 0.01) and a non-significant trend toward reducing thromboembolic events (RR = 0.69, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-1.14, p = 0.11). Furthermore, direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.63, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-0.91, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Direct oral anticoagulants may offer a safe alternative to vitamin K antagonists in CKD patients, particularly in terms of reducing bleeding risks and potentially improving survival. However, their role in preventing thromboembolic events remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research, especially in patients with advanced CKD and kidney failure.

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

Zero-contrast left atrial appendage closure, a feasible alternative for patients with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to reduce thrombotic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This procedure conventionally requires the use of a contrast agent. A significant proportion of patients who undergo this procedure have chronic kidney disease, with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the feasibility and safety of a zero-contrast LAAC technique.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies comparing a zero-contrast LAAC technique with conventional LAAC up to April 2024. From each study, we extracted baseline characteristics, feasibility, and safety outcomes. A random model meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Five studies reporting data from 367 patients were included. A 100% successful implantation rate was reported in all the zero-contrast groups. The mean number of recaptures reached no significant difference between the groups (mean difference, -0.15; CI, -0.67 to 0.37; I2 = 0%; P = .58). The zero-contrast group had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (mean difference, -4.03; CI, -7.72 to -0.34; I2 = 67%; P = .03). Complications related to the procedure, peridevice leak, and device-associated thrombus rates were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Zero-contrast LAAC is a feasible alternative. The success and complication rates are consistent with those of conventional LAAC. Aside from the inherent benefit of zero-contrast exposure, this technique allows a reduction in fluoroscopy time.

Comparison of value of 640-slice CT kidney scan and kidney ultrasound in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease

To explore the value of 640-slice CT kidney scan and kidney ultrasound (KUS) in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The data of 120 CKD patients at our institution between June 2019 and September 2020 were analyzed, and they were randomly divided into ultrasound (US) group (n = 40, KUS), CT group (n = 40) first receiving a plane CT scan to determine the scope of dynamic volume scan, which was performed for scans in cortical, parenchymal, and delayed phases with bolus injection of contrast medium, and combined group (n = 40, KUS and 640-slice CT kidney scan), with the images obtained read and analyzed. The subjective scores and effective radiation doses of 640-layer CT kidney scan were counted to calculate the detection rates. The subjective scores of 640-slice CT kidney scan in plane scan, cortical phase, parenchymal phase, and delayed phase were (1.23 ± 0.42), (1.80 ± 0.40), (2.08 ± 0.26), (2.18 ± 0.38) in the CT group and (1.18 ± 0.38), (1.85 ± 0.36), (2.08 ± 0.26), (2.20 ± 0.40) in the combined group. The effective radiation doses in the CT and combined groups were (1.92 ± 0.32) mSv and (1.95 ± 0.35) mSv. The reading results showed that 26 cases (65.0%), 30 cases (75.0%), and 38 cases (95.0%) were detected in the US, CT and combined groups, respectively, with remarkably higher detection rate in the combined group than the US and CT groups (P < 0.05). 640-slice CT kidney scan and KUS can be adopted for the diagnosis of CKD; with low radiation dose, good image quality, and higher detection rate in the former, their combination can improve the clinical detection rate of CKD and is worth promoting.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the first-line therapy for venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. As DOACs are partially excreted renally, their safety in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear.

Objectives

To synthesize primary evidence on the safety profile of DOACs in patients with CKD.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to June 2023 for randomized and nonrandomized cohort studies comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in CKD patients. Screening and data collection were conducted in duplicate. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, stratified by CKD severity. Meta-analysis was done using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, presented as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs.

Results

Of the 2355 articles captured in the literature search, 25 nonrandomized studies (n = 6832) and 6 randomized studies (n = 66,898) were included. DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in all subgroups (stage 4: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58, 0.93; stage 5/renal replacement therapy: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50, 0.98; stage unspecified: OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63, 0.83). Apixaban and rivaroxaban both reduced major bleeding in stage 5/renal replacement therapy patients (apixaban: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.85; rivaroxaban: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.94).

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in stage 4, stage 5/renal replacement therapy, and CKD stage unspecified patients. Future analysis should evaluate the impact of specific DOACs and dosage on safety and efficacy in this population.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in peritoneal dialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial (APIDP2)

INTRODUCTION

Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that novel oral anticoagulants are safer compared with vitamin K antagonists for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent thromboembolic events in the general population. There is a growing interest in the use of apixaban in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) but there is a lack of randomised data in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

APIDP2 is a prospective parallel, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial involving patients with ESRD undergoing chronic PD who have NVAF. A total of 178 participants will be recruited from 20 French PD centres. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either apixaban at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg two times per day (dose determined with the previous pharmacokinetic study APIDP1) or dose-adjusted to international normalised ratio (INR) target (2-3) coumadin therapy. Anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic events will be initiated or changed according to the randomisation for a duration of 1 year. The primary outcome is a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding from randomisation up to month 12, assessed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Score. Secondary outcomes encompass an efficacy composite criterion combining stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), cardiovascular death and thrombosis including myocardial infarction cumulated at 12 months. Bleeding events will be also classified according to Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria and pharmacodynamics outcomes will evaluate the time within the INR target range of 2-3 in the warfarin arm over 1 year, and anti-Xa apixaban activity in case of bleeding events and at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of follow-up in the apixaban arm. To demonstrate that apixaban is safer than warfarin at 1 year, assuming two interim analyses after 60 and 118 patients, a bilateral alpha risk of 5% and a power of 80%, 178 patients are needed in this randomised trial (effect size found from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) Study among patients with creatinine clearance 25-30 ml/min), that is, 89 patients per group.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committee Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Est III - Lyon - FRANCE, CT number 2023-507544-37-00. Written informed consent is required for each participant. Findings will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06045858; European Clinical Trial System, CT number 2023-507544-37-00.

Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become a standard of care for anticoagulation (AC) in patients with AF and VTE, the appropriate use of these agents in comorbid kidney impairment warrants detailed discussion. This scientific narrative review summarizes the effectiveness and safety of apixaban use in patients with renal dysfunction by assessing the current published pharmacokinetic, interventional, observational, and guideline data. Apixaban is a highly selective, orally active, direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with well-established pharmacokinetics and consistent clinical outcomes across a broad range of patient populations, including those with kidney impairment. Overall, the scientific literature has shown that apixaban has a favorable clinical efficacy and safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists for patients with AF or VTE and comorbid kidney impairment. These data support the approved label dosing strategy of apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and in treating VTE across all ranges of kidney function. Both clinician experience and knowledge of patient-specific factors may be required in the management of comorbid patients with advanced CKD or those requiring dialysis, as data on these patients are limited.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Decade of Experience

INTRODUCTION

Both the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its subsequent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly increasing in patients of older age. In the absence of contra-indications, guidelines advocate anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score for all AF patients aged 75 and above. However, some practitioners are hesitant to prescribe anticoagulants to older and frail patients due to perceived elevated bleeding risks. This review delves into the comparative treatment outcomes of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in older patients with AF, particularly focusing on those of advanced age, frailty, increased risk of falling, chronic kidney disease (CKD), or with a history of major bleeding. Additionally, considerations on the use of off-label DOAC doses, the role of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and future developments in factor XIa-inhibitors will be discussed.

RESULTS

While strong evidence supports the use of DOACs in the vital older patients with nonvalvular AF, it remains scant in frail patient groups. There is some evidence from non-randomized studies suggesting that the effect of DOACs compared with VKAs is consistent between frail and nonfrail patients. However, recent findings from a single randomized trial showed increased bleeding risks but comparable thromboembolic outcomes in frail individuals switching from VKAs to DOACs. In patients with an increased risk of falling, data suggest no relevant interaction of increased risk of falling on the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin. Resuming oral anticoagulants in patients with Af after major bleeding seems to be beneficial. Off-label low-dose DOAC is often prescribed to patients who were underrepresented in larger randomized trails because of an elevated risk of bleeding or overexposure to DOACs, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs are the recommended oral anticoagulant for vital older patients with AF. The scarcity of data backing DOAC use in frail individuals, those with renal impairments, or significant bleeding history underscores the necessity for further investigation. However, existing evidence suggests at least similar effectiveness and safety and potential benefits for DOACs in these patient subsets. Therefore, there is no reason to suggest these patients should be treated differently than the established guidelines regarding anticoagulation.

Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes between Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Dialysis

Background

Anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis poses significant challenges. This review aimed to furnish clinicians with the latest clinical outcomes associated with apixaban and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in managing AF patients on dialysis.

Methods

Literature from the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2024 underwent systematic scrutiny for inclusion. The results were narratively summarized.

Results

Six studies were included in this review, comprising the AXADIA-AFNET 8 study, the RENAL-AF trial, and four observational studies. In a French nationwide observational study, patients initiated on apixaban demonstrated a diminished risk of thromboembolic events (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.78) compared to those on VKAs. A retrospective review with a 2-year follow-up, encompassing patients with AF and ESKD on hemodialysis, evidenced no statistical difference in the risk of symptomatic bleeding and stroke between the apixaban and warfarin groups. Two retrospective studies based on the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database both indicated no statistical difference between apixaban and VKAs in the risk of thromboembolic events. One study reported that apixaban correlated with a reduced risk of major bleeding relative to warfarin (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.87), while the other study suggested that apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of mortality compared to warfarin (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-0.92). The AXADIA-AFNET 8 study found no differences between apixaban and VKAs in safety or effectiveness outcomes for AF patients on dialysis. The RENAL-AF trial, however, was deemed inadequate for drawing conclusions due to its small sample size.

Conclusions

Currently, the published studies generally support that apixaban exhibits non-inferior safety and effectiveness outcomes compared to VKAs for AF patients on dialysis.

Adverse outcomes with left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in chronic and end stage kidney disease: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are associated with increased risk of bleeding events, including hemorrhagic stroke, and periprocedural and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) among this patient population has been uncertain with studies showing contradictory results.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies comparing outcomes among patients with and without significant CKD, and with and without ESRD who underwent LAAO device implantation. Data on outcomes from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test.

RESULTS

Data from eleven studies with 61,724 patients with and without kidney disease were included in the final analyses. There was an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76, 95 % CI [1.15-6.64]; p = 0.02) and peri-procedural bleeding (1.51 [1.33-1.71]; p < 0.01) associated with kidney disease. There was no significant difference in risk of stroke (1.19 [0.70-2.03]; p = 0.53), pericardial effusion (1.22 [0.77-1.92]; p = 0.40), vascular complications (1.18 [0.92-1.52]; p = 0.20), or device related thrombus (1.13 [0.53-2.40]; p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows an increased risk of complications among patients with kidney disease, who undergo LAAO device implantation. These findings suggest the need for studies with randomized control design specifically designed to compare outcomes with LAAO versus anticoagulation in the CKD and ESRD populations.

Risk of Major Bleeding, Stroke/Systemic Embolism, and Death Associated With Different Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease have higher risks of bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. However, optimal anticoagulant choice in these high-risk patients remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using deidentified electronic health records from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, adults with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) initiating warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban between 2011 and 2021 were included. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, adjusted risks of major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death were compared among agents. A total of 6794 patients were included (mean age, 78.5 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2; 51% women). Apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 1.5 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.70]), and similar risks for stroke/systemic embolism (incidence rate, 1.9 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.09]) and death (incidence rate, 4.6 versus 4.5 per 100 person-years; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 4.9 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.10-2.48]), with no difference in risks for stroke/systemic embolism and death. Apixaban versus rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (sub-HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78]).

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world findings are consistent with potential safety advantages of apixaban over warfarin and rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials comparing individual oral anticoagulants are warranted.

A systematic review and Bayesian analysis of the adverse effects of dienogest

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two common diseases that impair women's health, and dienogest is one of the pharmacologic treatments which is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and individuals who have no desire for immediate pregnancy. The goal of this study was to summarize the current evidence of adverse events associated with dienogest as well as the prevalence of these adverse events during treatment with dienogest.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central and Clinicaltrials.gov, etc.) and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard were searched on May 31, 2023, using the topic words alongside free words of dienogest and "adverse reaction". Studies were incorporated into this research if they reported or assessed safety issues or adverse reactions of dienogest during the period of endometriosis treatment or adenomyosis therapy. The extracted information comprised trial design, dienogest and control group demographics, as well as reported side effects.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprehended 39 publications in total. The mean age of patients in the included studies was 34.43 years. The follow-up duration varied from 3 to 60 months. Most adverse reactions were common and not serious, and the most common adverse reactions during dienogest medication were abnormal uterine bleeding (55%, 95% CI 37-73%), amenorrhea (17%, 95% CI 2-42%) and swelling (13%, 95% CI 3-28%). Uncommon adverse reactions included dysmenorrhea (0.2%, n = 1), dyspepsia (0.4%, n = 1), and (lower) abdominal pain (1%, 95% CI 0-3%), urticaria (1%, 95% CI 0-3%) and peritonitis (1%, n = 1). Serious adverse reactions including decreased lumbar spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), depression, peritonitis and so on have been reported. Heterogeneity assessment revealed that patient number and study design are influencing factors to adverse reaction prevalence. Moreover, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, back pain and anemia are side effects reported both in the FAERS database and in the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest's most frequent side effects were not severe. Dienogest is generally safe for treating endometriosis and adenomyosis. Nevertheless, people should be aware of serious adverse reactions, such as decreased lumbar spine BMD and hemorrhagic shock.

Effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban on fibrin network permeability, thrombin generation, and fibrinolysis

INTRODUCTION

There are important pharmacological differences between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and a deeper knowledge of how they influence different aspects of hemostasis in patients on treatment is desirable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples from patients on dabigatran (n = 23), rivaroxaban (n = 26), or apixaban (n = 20) were analyzed with a fibrin network permeability assay, a turbidimetric clotting and lysis assay, the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT), plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and D-dimer, as well as DOAC concentrations, PT-INR and aPTT. As a comparison, we also analyzed samples from 27 patients on treatment with warfarin.

RESULTS

Patients on dabigatran had a more permeable fibrin network, longer lag time (CAT and turbidimetric assay), and lower levels of D-dimer in plasma, compared with patients on rivaroxaban- and apixaban treatment, and a more permeable fibrin network than patients on warfarin. Clot lysis time was slightly longer in patients on dabigatran than in patients on rivaroxaban. Warfarin patients formed a more permeable fibrin network than patients on apixaban, had longer lag time than patients on rivaroxaban (CAT assay), and lower peak thrombin and ETP compared to patients on treatment with both FXa-inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study indicate dabigatran treatment is a more potent anticoagulant than apixaban and rivaroxaban. However, as these results are not supported by clinical data, they are probably more related to the assays used and highlight the difficulty of measuring and comparing the effect of anticoagulants.

CURE: A deep learning framework pre-trained on large-scale patient data for treatment effect estimation

Treatment effect estimation (TEE) aims to identify the causal effects of treatments on important outcomes. Current machine-learning-based methods, mainly trained on labeled data for specific treatments or outcomes, can be sub-optimal with limited labeled data. In this article, we propose a new pre-training and fine-tuning framework, CURE (causal treatment effect estimation), for TEE from observational data. CURE is pre-trained on large-scale unlabeled patient data to learn representative contextual patient representations and fine-tuned on labeled patient data for TEE. We present a new sequence encoding approach for longitudinal patient data embedding both structure and time. Evaluated on four downstream TEE tasks, CURE outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, marking a 7% increase in area under the precision-recall curve and an 8% rise in the influence-function-based precision of estimating heterogeneous effects. Validation with four randomized clinical trials confirms its efficacy in producing trial conclusions, highlighting CURE's capacity to supplement traditional clinical trials.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice timely and fully, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2‑VASc‑60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of the Asian AF population. The guidelines also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Retrospective study of clinical settings, indications and consequences of measurement of direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in Northern Tasmania, Australia

BACKGROUND

Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals.

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia.

METHODS

Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history.

CONCLUSION

Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed.

When anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation becomes difficult: Focus on chronic kidney disease, coagulation disorders, and cancer

Anticoagulation therapy (AT) is fundamental in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment but poses challenges in implementation, especially in AF populations with elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Current guidelines emphasize the need to estimate and balance thrombosis and bleeding risks for all potential candidates of antithrombotic therapy. However, administering oral AT raises concerns in specific populations, such as those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), coagulation disorders, and cancer due to lack of robust data. These groups, excluded from large direct oral anticoagulants trials, rely on observational studies, prompting physicians to adopt individualized management strategies based on case-specific evaluations. The scarcity of evidence and specific guidelines underline the need for a tailored approach, emphasizing regular reassessment of risk factors and anticoagulation drug doses. This narrative review aims to summarize evidence and recommendations for challenging AF clinical scenarios, particularly in the long-term management of AT for patients with CKD, coagulation disorders, and cancer.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation combined with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently published studies have not observed consistent results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) combined with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, this study conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of DOACs for patients with AF complicated with CKD.

METHODS

Database literature was searched up to May 30, 2023, to include randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving patients with AF complicated with CKD DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and all-cause mortality were used as effectiveness indicators, and major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were used as safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine RCT studies were included for analysis according to the inclusion criteria. Results of the efficacy analysis showed that compared with VKAs, DOACs reduced the incidence of stroke/SE (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84) and all-cause deaths (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93) in patients with AF who had comorbid CKD. Safety analyses showed that compared with VKAs, DOACs improved safety by reducing the risk of major bleeding (OR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.65-0.90), ICH (OR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.38-0.56), and fatal bleeding (OR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.65-0.87), but did not reduce the incidence of GIB and CRNMB.

CONCLUSION

Compared with VKAs, DOACs may increase efficacy and improve safety in AF patients with CKD (90 ml/min> Crcl≥15 ml/min), and shows at least similar efficacy and safety in AF patients with Kidney failure (Crcl<15 ml/min).

Anticoagulation for Patients With Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concomitant atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease is common and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although oral anticoagulants have been well established to prevent thromboembolism, the applicability in patients under long-term dialysis remains debatable. The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in the dialysis-dependent population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An updated network meta-analysis based on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban 2.5/5 mg twice daily), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and no anticoagulation were compared on safety and efficacy outcomes. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause death. A total of 42 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, with 185 864 subjects were pooled. VKAs were associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding than either no anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61) or DOACs (DOACs versus VKAs; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]). For the prevention of thromboembolism, the efficacies of VKAs, DOACs, and no anticoagulation were equivalent. Nevertheless, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with fewer embolic events. There were no differences in all-cause death with the administration of VKAs, DOACs, or no anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

For dialysis-dependent populations, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with better efficacy, while dabigatran and apixaban demonstrated better safety. No anticoagulation was a noninferior alterative, and VKAs were associated with the worst outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Saudi Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly heightens stroke risk, which can be mitigated through anticoagulation therapy. Although warfarin was traditionally employed for this purpose, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is on the rise.

METHODS

This retrospective study, which spanned from June 2016 to January 2018, focused on adult patients diagnosed with AF. Their treatments, either via warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran), were evaluated. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 21; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin in preventing thromboembolic complications among Saudi patients with AF.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients with AF, averaging 66 ± 14 years of age, were part of the study. Among them, there were slightly more female patients (205 or 51.8%). The majority of patients (223 or 56.3%) were treated with a DOAC, while the rest (173 or 43.7%) received warfarin. Furthermore, 93 patients (23.5%) were taking anti-platelet drugs. Statistically, the rate of ischemic stroke was significantly higher among patients treated with DOACs than with warfarin (p=0.005), but bleeding rates were similar in both groups. Specifically, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban showed a significant association with the occurrence of stroke when compared to warfarin (p=0.012 and p=007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, both DOACs and warfarin presented similar results regarding hemorrhagic complications when treating AF patients. However, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban displayed higher risks of ischemic stroke compared to warfarin.

Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice in a timely and comprehensive manner, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of the Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of the Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering have jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines have comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of AF in the Asian population. The guidelines have also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Oral Anticoagulation Use in Individuals With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is associated with an increased risk of stroke, which increases as kidney function declines. In the general population and in those with a moderate degree of CKD (creatinine clearance 30-50 mL/min), the use of oral anticoagulation to decrease the risk of stroke has been the standard of care based on a favorable risk-benefit profile that had been established in seminal randomized controlled trials. However, evidence regarding the use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention is less clear in patients with severe CKD (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) and those receiving maintenance dialysis, as these individuals were excluded from such large randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, the direct oral anticoagulants have invariably usurped vitamin K antagonists as the preferred choice for oral anticoagulation among patients with AF across all strata of CKD based on their well-defined safety and efficacy and multiple pharmacokinetic benefits (e.g., less drug-drug interactions). This review summarizes the current literature on the role of oral anticoagulation in the management of AF among patients with CKD and highlights current deficiencies in the evidence base and how to overcome them.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Current Literature and Views

Atrial fibrillation is a common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with uncoordinated atrial activation and ineffective atrial contraction. This leads to an increased risk of atrial thrombi, most commonly in the left atrial appendage, and increased risks of embolic strokes and/or peripheral thromboembolism. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To meet the concerns of thrombi and stroke, anticoagulation has been the mainstay for prevention and treatment thereof. Historically, anticoagulation involved the use of aspirin or vitamin K antagonists, mainly warfarin. Since early 2010s, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been introduced and approved for anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation. DOACs demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage as compared to warfarin, and offer the advantages of absolution of monitoring therefore avoid the risk of hemorrhages in the context of narrow therapeutic window and under-treatment characteristic of warfarin, particularly in high-risk patients. One major concern and disadvantage for DOACs was lack of reversal agents, which have largely been ameliorated by the approval of Idarucizumab for dabigatran and Andexanet alfa for both apixaban and rivaroxaban, with Ciraparantag as a universal reversal agent for all DOACs undergoing Fast-Track Review from FDA. In this article, we will be providing a broad review of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation with a focus on risk stratification schemes and anticoagulation agents (warfarin, aspirin, DOACs) including special clinical considerations.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Warfarin or Rivaroxaban Versus Apixaban in Patients With Advanced CKD and Atrial Fibrillation: Nationwide US Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Head-to-head data comparing the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are lacking. We compared the safety and effectiveness of warfarin or rivaroxaban versus apixaban in patients with AF and non-dialysis-dependent CKD stage 4/5.

STUDY DESIGN

Propensity score-matched cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

2 nationwide US claims databases, Medicare and Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, were searched for the interval from January 1, 2013, through March 31, 2022, for patients with nonvalvular AF and CKD stage 4/5 who initiated warfarin versus apixaban (matched cohort, n=12,488) and rivaroxaban versus apixaban (matched cohort, n = 5,720).

EXPOSURES

Warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes included major bleeding and ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cox regression was used to estimate HRs, and 1:1 propensity-score matching was used to adjust for 80 potential confounders.

RESULTS

Compared with apixaban, warfarin initiation was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.59-2.15), including major gastrointestinal bleeding (1.86; 1.53-2.25) and intracranial bleeding (2.15; 1.42-3.25). Compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban was also associated with a higher rate of major bleeding (1.69; 1.33-2.15). All-cause mortality was similar for warfarin (1.08; 0.98-1.18) and rivaroxaban (0.94; 0.81-1.10) versus apixaban. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences for ischemic stroke were observed for warfarin (1.14; 0.83-1.57) or rivaroxaban (0.71; 0.40-1.24) versus apixaban, but the CIs were wide. Similar results were observed for warfarin versus apixaban in the positive control cohort of patients with CKD stage 3, consistent with randomized trial findings.

LIMITATIONS

Few ischemic stroke events, potential residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and advanced CKD, rivaroxaban and warfarin were associated with higher rates of major bleeding compared with apixaban, suggesting a superior safety profile for apixaban in this high-risk population.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Different anticoagulants have been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, such as warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants like apixaban and rivaroxaban. Unfortunately, the large-scale randomized trials that compared direct anticoagulants versus warfarin excluded patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Therefore, the comparative safety and effectiveness of warfarin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban are uncertain in this population. In this study, we used administrative claims data from the United States to answer this question. We found that warfarin and rivaroxaban were associated with increased risks of major bleeding compared with apixaban. There were few stroke events, with no major differences among the 3 drugs in the risk of stroke. In conclusion, this study suggests that apixaban has a better safety profile than warfarin and rivaroxaban.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of apixaban to predict exposure in populations with hepatic and renal impairment and elderly populations

BACKGROUND

Apixaban is a factor Xa inhibitor with a limited therapeutic index that belongs to the family of oral direct anticoagulants. The pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of apixaban may be altered in elderly populations and populations with renal or hepatic impairment, necessitating dosage adjustments.

METHODS

This study was conducted to examine how the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describes the PKs of apixaban in adult and elderly populations and to determine the PKs of apixaban in elderly populations with renal and hepatic impairment. After PBPK models were constructed using the reported physicochemical properties of apixaban and clinical data, they were validated using data from clinical studies involving various dose ranges. Comparing predicted and observed blood concentration data and PK parameters was utilized to evaluate the model's fit performance.

RESULTS

Doses should be reduced to approximately 70% of the healthy adult population for the healthy elderly population to achieve the same PK exposure; approximately 88%, 71%, and 89% of that for the elderly populations with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively; and approximately 96%, 81%, and 58% of that for the Child Pugh-A, Child Pugh-B, and Child Pugh-C hepatic impairment elderly populations, respectively to achieve the same PK exposure.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that the renal and hepatic function might be considered for apixaban therapy in Chinese elderly patients and the PBPK model can be used to optimize dosage regimens for specific populations.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

A narrative review of acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis: from pathogenesis to clinical management

Acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis (APISVT) is an important sequela complication of acute pancreatitis, which may cause poor prognosis, such as severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bowel ischemic necrosis and liver failure. However, its mechanism remains uncertain, and there is not a general consensus on the management. In this study, we reviewed the latest academic publications in APISVT, and discussed its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, adverse outcome and treatment, especially focused on the role of anticoagulant therapy. It was indicated that anticoagulation therapy can significantly elevate thrombus recanalization and reduce the incidence of complications and mortality with no increase of bleeding. Actually, as most of these studies were retrospective analyses and prospective studies included small samples, the conclusion remains controversial. Thus, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urged to verify the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy for APISVT.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have overtaken vitamin K antagonists to become the most widely used method of anticoagulation for most indications. Their stable and predictable pharmacokinetics combined with relatively simple dosing, and the absence of routine monitoring has made them an attractive proposition for healthcare providers. Despite the benefits of DOACs as a class, important differences exist between individual DOAC drugs in respect of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with implications for dosing and reversal in cases of major bleeding.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the state of knowledge relating to the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran (factor IIa/thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (factor Xa) inhibitors. We focus on pharmacokinetic differences between the drugs which may have clinically significant implications.

EXPERT OPINION

Patient-centered care necessitates a careful consideration of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between DOACs, and how these relate to individual patient circumstances. Prescribers should be aware of the potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions with DOACs which may influence prescribing decisions in patients with multiple comorbidities. In order to give an appropriate dose of DOAC drugs, accurate estimation of renal function using the Cockcroft-Gault formula using actual body weight is necessary. An increasing body of evidence supports the use of DOACs in patients who are obese, and this is becoming more routine in clinical practice.

Associations of Apixaban Dose With Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for apixaban dosing on the basis of kidney function are inconsistent between the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for patients with atrial fibrillation. Optimal apixaban dosing in chronic kidney disease remains unknown.

METHODS

With the use of deidentified electronic health record data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease stage 4/5 initiating apixaban between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Risks of bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism were compared by apixaban dose (5 versus 2.5 mg), adjusted for baseline characteristics by the inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was used to account for the competing risk of death. Cox regression was used to examine risk of death by apixaban dose.

RESULTS

Among 4313 apixaban new users, 1705 (40%) received 5 mg and 2608 (60%) received 2.5 mg. Patients treated with 5 mg apixaban were younger (mean age, 72 versus 80 years), with greater weight (95 versus 80 kg) and higher serum creatinine (2.7 versus 2.5 mg/dL). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was not different between the groups (24 versus 24 mL·min-1·1.73 m-2). In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, apixaban 5 mg was associated with a higher risk of bleeding (incidence rate 4.9 versus 2.9 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate difference, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.6-3.4] events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.04-2.54]). There was no difference between apixaban 5 mg and 2.5 mg groups in the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (3.3 versus 3.0 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate difference, 0.2 [95% CI, -1.0 to 1.4] events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.59-1.73]), or death (9.9 versus 9.4 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate difference, 0.5 [95% CI, -1.6 to 2.6] events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 2.5 mg, use of 5 mg apixaban was associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease, with no difference in the risk of stroke/systemic embolism or death, supporting the apixaban dosing recommendations on the basis of kidney function by the European Medicines Agency, which differ from those issued by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and advanced kidney disease (AKD) has not been fully established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety related to pooled or specific DOACs to that with warfarin in patients with AF and AKD.

METHODS

Patients with AF and AKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min) who received DOAC or warfarin from July 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified in a medical center in Taiwan. Primary outcomes were hospitalized for stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included any ischemia and any bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 1,011 patients were recruited, of whom 809 (80.0%) were in the DOACs group (15.3% dabigatran, 25.4% rivaroxaban, 25.2% apixaban, and 14.1% edoxaban), and 202 (20.0%) in the warfarin group. DOACs had considerably lower risks of stroke/systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97) and any ischemia (aHR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79), but had comparable risks of major bleeding (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.34-2.92) and any bleeding (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09) than warfarin. Apixaban was linked to considerably lower risks of any ischemia (aHR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.48) and any bleeding (aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99) than warfarin.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with AF and AKD, DOACs were linked to a lower risk of ischemic events, and apixaban was linked to a lower risk of any ischemia and any bleeding than warfarin.

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Anticoagulation Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Anticoagulation therapy can reduce this risk, but the optimal choice of anticoagulant in patients with AF and renal dysfunction is challenging. Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity seen in patients with AF. Renal dysfunction would affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants and make the patient more prone to bleeding complications. This complicates the assessment of the risks, benefits, and ratio for starting anticoagulant drugs in patients with renal dysfunction. Therefore, there is always a therapeutic conundrum due to the increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in AF patients with renal dysfunction. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the current literature and identify the challenges of anticoagulation strategies in AF with renal dysfunction. We examined 180 articles from reputable journals published from 2018 to June 2023 and selected eight papers for detailed analysis. The studies we chose included a variety of drug treatments, such as traditional therapies like vitamin K antagonists, factor Xa inhibitors, heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors. This systematic review will provide comprehensive information on the latest data on the effectiveness of various pharmacological treatments (anticoagulation strategies) in AF patients with renal dysfunction. The aim is to help doctors and other healthcare decision-makers choose the best anticoagulation strategy in AF patients with renal dysfunction and to overcome their dilemma between bleeding risk and systemic thromboembolic events.

Prescription of DOACs in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Different Stages of Renal Insufficiency

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal insufficiency often coexist and are increasingly prevalent with advancing age. Both the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding propensity are higher in patients with AF and impaired renal function versus those with good renal health. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the treatment of patients with AF and impaired renal function as VKAs may accelerate progression of chronic kidney disease. DOACs, however, are eliminated by the kidneys to varying degrees, and their dosages must be adapted in accordance with renal function. Since creatinine clearance (CrCl) monitoring is recommended in patients with AF receiving DOAC therapy, CrCl must be routinely monitored in patients at the start and during the course of anticoagulation to avoid deviation from Summary of Product Characteristics dosage specifications. This review article provides an overview of current knowledge on the selection and dose of DOACs including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in AF patients at different stages of renal insufficiency, with a special focus on elderly patients with comorbidities and receiving multiple medications. The groups discussed in this review include patients with varying levels of CrCl including hyperfiltration or CrCl > 90 ml/min, CrCl < 90-50 ml/min, CrCl < 50-30 ml/min, CrCl < 30-15 ml/min and end-stage renal disease or on dialysis.

Atrial Fibrillation in Kidney Failure: Challenges in Risk Assessment and Anticoagulation Management

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a clinical conundrum in people with kidney failure. Stroke risk is disproportionately high, but clinicians have a limited armamentarium to improve outcomes in this population in whom there is a concurrently high bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulants may have a superior benefit-risk profile compared with vitamin K antagonists in people on hemodialysis. Although research has predominantly focused on identifying a safe and effective oral anticoagulation option to reduce stroke risk in people with kidney failure (and predominantly those on hemodialysis), it remains uncertain how clinicians discriminate between people who would derive net clinical benefit as opposed to net harm. The recommended CHA2DS2-VASc score cutoffs provide poor discriminatory value, and there is an urgent need to identify robust markers of thromboembolic risk in kidney failure. There is increasing data to challenge the prior dogma of risk equivalence across AF type, and the American Heart Association highlights moving beyond AF as a binary entity to consider the prognostic significance of AF burden. Implantable cardiac monitor studies reveal high rates and varied burden of subclinical and paroxysmal AF in people on hemodialysis. The association between AF burden and the proarrhythmic environment of hemodialysis with cyclical volume loading, offloading, and electrolyte changes is not well studied. We review the significance of AF burden as a contributor to thromboembolic risk, its potential as the missing link in risk assessment, and updated evidence for anticoagulation in people with kidney failure.

Elzeftawy M, Abdelazeem B. The efficacy and safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in patients on hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Direct factor Xa inhibitors have been extensively prescribed for multiple indications; however, hemodialysis patients have been excluded from most of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of direct factor Xa inhibitors. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in hemodialysis patients is uncertain.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through November 25, 2022. We used the fixed-effect model to pool the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RevMan v5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous outcomes using RR and continuous outcomes using mean difference presented with the corresponding CI.

Results

Three RCTs with a total of 341 patients were included in our analysis. There was no difference between direct factor Xa inhibitors and VKAs regarding all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI [0.76, 1.30]; P = 0.96), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.35; 95% CI [0.71, 2.60]; P = 0.36), noncardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.75; 95% CI [0.53, 1.05]; P = 0.09), sudden mortality (RR, 1.33; 95% CI [0.53, 3.33]; P = 0.54), any cerebrovascular event (RR, 0.52; 95% CI [0.21, 1.29]; P = 0.16), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.51; 95% CI [0.19, 1.37]; P = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR, 0.61; 95% CI [0.10, 3.70]; P = 0.59).

Conclusion

In patients with atrial fibrillation who are on hemodialysis, direct factor Xa inhibitors and VKAs were similar in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes. However, evidence is still sparse, warranting dedicated RCTs.

Managing older people with atrial fibrillation and preventing stroke: a review of anticoagulation approaches

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but prescribing decisions in older people are complicated. Clinicians must assess the net clinical benefit of OAC in the context of multiple chronic conditions, polypharmacy, frailty and life expectancy. The under-representation of high-risk, older adult sub-populations in clinical trials presents the challenge of choosing the right OAC, where a 'one-size-fits-all' approach cannot be taken.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses OAC approaches for stroke prevention in older people with AF and presents a prescribing aid to support clinicians' decision-making. High-risk older adults with multiple chronic conditions, specifically chronic kidney disease, dementia/cognitive impairment, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack or intracranial hemorrhage, polypharmacy, frailty, low body weight, high falls risk, and those aged ≥75 years are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Non-vitamin K antagonist OACs are the preferred first-line OAC in older adults with AF, including high-risk subpopulations, after individual assessment of stroke and bleeding risk, except those with mechanical heart valves and moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis. Head-to-head comparisons of NOACs are not available, therefore the choice of drug (and dose) should be based on an individual's risk (stroke and bleeding) and incorporate their treatment preferences. Treatment decisions must be person-centered and principles of shared decision-making applied.

Renal Function and Clinical Outcomes Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation From ANAFIE

Background

Advancing age, decreasing renal function, and atrial fibrillation are strongly associated. Real-world evidence of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use among elderly patients ≥75 years of age with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction is limited.

Objectives

This study sought to assess 2-year outcomes and anticoagulant treatment, stratified by renal function.

Methods

Enrolled patients were divided into 4 subgroups by creatinine clearance (CrCl) to determine the impact of renal dysfunction on clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 32,275 patients, 26,202 with CrCl data were analyzed (median follow-up 2.00 [IQR: 1.92-2.00] years); 1.3% of patients had CrCl <15 mL/min, 10.7% had CrCl 15 to <30 mL/min, 33.4% had CrCl 30 to <50 mL/min, 35.8% had CrCl ≥50 mL/min, and 18.9% had unknown CrCl. Cumulative incidences of stroke/systemic embolic events, major bleeding, major plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and net clinical outcomes increased with decreasing CrCl. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, lower CrCl emerged as an independent risk factor for these clinical outcomes, except for major bleeding, compared with CrCl ≥50 mL/min. The effectiveness and safety of DOACs over warfarin were similar or better across 3 CrCl subgroups with CrCl 15 mL/min or more. DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolic events, major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and net clinical outcome compared with warfarin in patients with CrCl 30 to <50 mL/min.

Conclusions

Incidences of major clinical outcomes increased with decreasing renal function in elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. DOACs were effective and safe even in patients with renal dysfunction (CrCl 15-<50 mL/min). (Prospective Observational Study in Late-Stage Elderly Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: All Nippon AF In Elderly Registry [ANAFIE Registry]; UMIN000024006).

Oral anticoagulant switching in patients with atrial fibrillation: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.

CONCLUSIONS

OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Clinical benefits and risks of anticoagulation therapy according to the degree of chronic kidney disease in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits and risks of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are still inconclusive. We describe the outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after anticoagulation therapy according to differences in creatinine clearance (CrCl). We also aimed to determine the patients who could benefit from anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational review of patients with AF who were managed at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018. Patients were categorized into groups according to their baseline CrCl by Cockcroft-Gault equation and their outcomes were evaluated (CKD 1, ≥ 90 mL/min; CKD2, 60-89 mL/min; CKD3, 30-59 mL/min; CKD4, 15-29 mL/min; CKD 5, < 15 mL/min). The primary outcome was NACE (net adverse clinical events), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

We identified 12,714 consecutive patients with AF (mean 64.6 ± 11.9 years, 65.3% male, mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 2.4 ± 1.6 points) between 2006 and 2017. In patients receiving anticoagulation therapy (n = 4447, 35.0%), warfarin (N = 3768, 84.7%) was used more frequently than NOACs (N = 673, 15.3%). There was a higher 3-year rate of NACE with renal function deterioration (14.8%, 18.6%, 30.3%, 44.0%, and 48.8% for CKD stages 1-5, respectively).The clinical benefit of anticoagulation therapy was most prominent in patients with CKD 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.67), 2 (HR 0.64 CI 0.54-0.76), and 3 (HR 0.64 CI 0.54-0.76), but not in CKD 4 (HR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.28) and 5 (HR 0.81, CI 0.47-1.40). Among patients with CKD, the benefit of anticoagulation therapy was only evident in those with a high risk of embolism (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 4, HR 0.25, CI 0.08-0.80).

CONCLUSION

Advanced CKD is associated with a higher risk of NACE. The clinical benefit of anticoagulation therapy was reduced with the increasing CKD stage.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with left-sided bioprosthetic heart valves and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of patients with left-sided bioprosthetic heart valves (BHV) and atrial fibrillation (AF) remain controversial. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in this region.

METHODS

We retrieved all relevant randomized controlled studies and observational cohort studies, which critically assessed the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs among patients with left-sided BHV and AF in databases of PubMed, Cochrane, ISI Web of Sciences, and Embase. The efficacy outcomes of this meta-analysis were stroke events and all-cause death when the safety outcomes included major and any bleeding.

RESULTS

The analysis integrated 13 studies while enrolling 27,793 patients with AF and left-sided BHV. DOACs reduced the rate of stroke by 33% compared with VKAs (risk ratio [RR] 0.67; 95% CI 0.50-0.91), with no increased incidence of all-cause death (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.82-1.12). For safety outcomes, major bleeding was reduced by 28% using DOACs rather than VKAs (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99), while there was no difference in the events of any bleeding (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68-1.03). In addition, in patients younger than 75 years old, the stroke rate was reduced by 45% in the population using DOACs (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.84).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that in patients with AF and BHV, compared with VKAs, using DOACs was associated with reduced stroke and major bleeding events without an increase of all-cause mortality and any bleeding. In the population younger than 75 years old, DOAC might be more effective in preventing cardiogenic stroke.

Secondary Ischemic Stroke Prevention

The health burden of ischemic stroke is high and will continue to increase with an aging population. Recurrent ischemic stroke is increasingly recognized as a major public health concern with potentially debilitating sequelae. Thus, it is imperative to develop and implement effective strategies for stroke prevention. When considering secondary ischemic stroke prevention, it is important to consider the mechanism of the first stroke and the related vascular risk factors. Secondary ischemic stroke prevention typically includes multiple medical and, potentially, surgical treatments, but with the shared goal of reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Providers, health care systems, and insurers also need to consider the availability of treatments, their cost and patient burden, methods for improving adherence, and interventions that target lifestyle risk factors such as diet or activity. In this article, we discuss aspects from the 2021 AHA Guideline on Secondary Stroke Prevention as well as highlight additional information relevant to best practices for reducing recurrent stroke risk.

Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: CODE-AF Registry

PURPOSE

Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, increases thromboembolic risk among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study examined the comparative safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared to warfarin or no oral anticoagulant (OAC) in AF patients with advanced CKD or ESRD on dialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of AF (CODE-AF) registry, 260 non-valvular AF patients with advanced CKD (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73/m²) or ESRD on dialysis were enrolled from June 2016 to July 2020. The study population was categorized into DOAC, warfarin, and no OAC groups; and differences in major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction/critical limb ischemia (CLI), and death were assessed.

RESULTS

During a median 24 months of follow-up, major or CRNM bleeding risk was significantly reduced in the DOAC group compared to the warfarin group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.93, p=0.043]. In addition, the risk of composite adverse clinical outcomes (major or CRNM bleeding, stroke/SE, myocardial infarction/CLI, and death) was significantly reduced in the DOAC group compared to the no OAC group (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.91, p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Among AF patients with advanced CKD or ESRD on dialysis, DOAC was associated with a lower risk of major or CRNM bleeding compared to warfarin and a lower risk of composite adverse clinical outcomes compared to no OAC. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02786095).

Apixaban for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

There are no randomized data evaluating the safety or efficacy of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis and with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

The RENAL-AF trial (Renal Hemodialysis Patients Allocated Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome evaluation (PROBE) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients receiving hemodialysis with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 5 mg of apixaban twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily for patients ≥80 years of age, weight ≤60 kg, or both) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The primary outcome was time to major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke, mortality, and apixaban pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic sampling was day 1, day 3, and month 1.

RESULTS

From January 2017 through January 2019, 154 patients were randomly assigned to apixaban (n=82) or warfarin (n=72). The trial stopped prematurely because of enrollment challenges. Time in therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) for warfarin-treated patients was 44% (interquartile range, 23%-59%). The 1-year rates for major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 32% and 26% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.30]), whereas 1-year rates for stroke or systemic embolism were 3.0% and 3.3% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Death was the most common major event in the apixaban (21 patients [26%]) and warfarin (13 patients [18%]) arms. The pharmacokinetic substudy enrolled the target 50 patients. Median steady-state 12-hour area under the curve was 2475 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 1342-3285) for 5 mg of apixaban twice daily and 1269 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 615-1946) for 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily. There was substantial overlap between minimum apixaban blood concentration, 12-hour area under the curve, and maximum apixaban blood concentration for patients with and without a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event.

CONCLUSIONS

There was inadequate power to draw any conclusion regarding rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Clinically relevant bleeding events were ≈10-fold more frequent than stroke or systemic embolism among this population on anticoagulation, highlighting the need for future randomized studies evaluating the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation among patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02942407.