Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Intermittent Claudication: Focused Update

Intermittent claudication (IC) is the most common symptom of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which is a growing public health burden in the United States and globally. Patients with IC present with a broad spectrum of risk factors, comorbid conditions, range of disability, and treatment goals. Informed shared decision-making hinges on a comprehensive evaluation of these factors, patient education, and knowledge of the latest available evidence. In 2015 the Society for Vascular Surgery published a clinical practice guideline on the management of asymptomatic PAD and IC. An expert writing group was commissioned to provide a focused update to this guideline on the management of IC. Based on the available evidence from published research conducted since the prior guideline, six specific key questions were formulated spanning the areas of antithrombotic management, exercise therapy, and revascularization for IC. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of each question was conducted by a dedicated methodology team. The GRADE approach was employed to describe the strength of each recommendation and level of certainty of evidence. The review identified major gaps in evidence particularly in the arena of comparative effectiveness for interventions (exercise, revascularization) across defined clinical subgroups and employing meaningful patient-centered outcomes. Twelve recommendations, among which are two best practice statements, are provided in this focused update. They address the use of dual pathway antithrombotic strategies, the role and type of exercise therapy, endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal disease, and the identification of specific risk factors that should be incorporated into shared decision making around revascularization. A comprehensive and individualized approach to the management of patients with IC, relying first on education, risk factor control, optimal medical therapy, and exercise, is emphasized. A rubric for decision making that includes a thorough assessment of risk, benefits, degree of impairment and treatment durability, is considered fundamental to a patient-centered approach in IC. Significant unmet research needs in this field are also enumerated.

Expanding indications for drug-coated balloons in coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite technical advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and new iterations of drug-eluting stents (DES), complications still occur, including stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide a promising option for the treatment of coronary lesions - particularly when DES are undesirable or contraindicated - allowing for PCI without the implantation of metallic devices, thus adhering to the 'leave nothing behind' principle.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive literature search has been performed on PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane, up to November 2024, with no significant restrictions. This article provides an overview of available DCB and summarizes the evidence supporting their use in different settings, including ISR, small-vessel disease, de novo large-vessel disease, and bifurcations.

EXPERT OPINION

Trials of DCB are heterogeneous with respect to population, sample size, follow-up, anatomical pattern, and device used. Furthermore, they usually have limited statistical power for clinical endpoints. Based on current knowledge, DES may be preferrable for DES-ISR, de novo lesions in large vessels and for the treatment of the main branch in true bifurcations, with DCB approved for small-vessel disease and selected ISR lesions. Ongoing trials are expected to provide definitive insights into the efficacy and safety of DCB in different scenarios.

Bioengineering Strategies for Treating Neointimal Hyperplasia in Peripheral Vasculature: Innovations and Challenges

Neointimal hyperplasia, a pathological response to arterial interventions or injury, often leads to restenosis and recurrent narrowing or occlusion, particularly in the peripheral vasculature. Its prevalence and negative impact on the long-term success of vascular interventions have driven extensive research aimed at better understanding the condition and developing effective therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of emerging bioengineering strategies for treating neointimal hyperplasia in peripheral vessels. These approaches include novel therapeutics and cell-based technologies designed to promote re-endothelialization, modulate vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) phenotype, reduce inflammation, scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), and enhance biomechanical compatibility between grafts and native vessels. Furthermore, advanced therapeutic delivery modalities are highlighted for their potential to achieve targeted, localized treatment at injury sites. This review also explores underrepresented therapeutic targets beyond traditional approaches, offering new opportunities for intervention. The multifaceted examination underscores the challenge of neointimal hyperplasia and presents a promising roadmap toward more effective treatments, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes after vascular interventions.

French multicentric registry on LUMINOR drug-eluting balloon for superficial femoral and popliteal arteries

BACKGROUND

Endovascular interventions using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown promise in improving outcomes for femoropopliteal (FP) revascularizations. Luminor, a nanotechnology-based paclitaxel coated balloon, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in Effpac (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-coated Luminor Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Arteria Femoralis Superficialis). The LUMIFOLLOW (European All-comers' Multicentric Prospective REGISTRY on LUMINOR Drug Eluting Balloon in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Popliteal Artery With 5 Years Follow-up) registry, a large-scale, prospective, multicenter study, aims to assess the real-world performance of Luminor in FP lesions.

METHODS

LUMIFOLLOW enrolled 542 patients with 580 lesions across 15 French centers. It included both de novo and restenotic lesions, with calcified and/or long occlusions. Primary end points were medical safety (defined as freedom from peri-procedural death, index limb amputation, and/or all-cause mortality) and efficacy (primary patency defined as freedom from target lesion revascularization and/or binary restenosis); secondary end points included acute device success, procedural and clinical success, major adverse events, and functional assessments.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 71.2 years, with 67.2% male patients. Prevalent comorbidities included diabetes (n = 231/542 [42.6%]), hypertension (n = 391/542 [72.1%]), hyperlipidemia (n = 305/542 [56.3%]), and current smoking (n = 147/540 [27.2%]); 23.8% were classified as Rutherford category 2 (n = 129/542), 43.2% as Rutherford category 3 (n = 234/542), 16.8% as Rutherford category 4 (n = 91/542), and 16.2% as Rutherford category 5 (n = 88/542). Lesions were located in the superficial femoral artery (n = 329/572 [57.5%]) and could extend to the popliteal artery (n = 243/572 [42.5%]), with 43.6% classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C or D; 24.2% were restenosis (n = 139/575) with a 44.3% rate of total occlusions (n = 255/576). The mean lesion length was 140.55 ± 99.42 mm. Provisional stenting was required in 43.1% of patients (n = 249/580), with a mean stent length shorter than the initial lesion length at 87.21 ± 42.30 mm. The acute procedural success rate was 99.4% (n = 536/539), with two in-hospital deaths and one thrombosis of target lesion. Acute clinical success was achieved in 93.5% (n = 504/539). The 12-month composite safety end point was 82.7% (5.7% all-cause mortality, 0.7% index limb major amputation) and the estimated primary patency was 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-90.1%), with freedom from target lesion revascularization at 96.2% (95% CI, 93.9%-97.6%) and from target vessel revascularization at 94.9% (95% CI, 92.5%-96.6%). The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire indicated significant improvements in quality of life at 12 months, with 67.4% improved mobility, 63.5% reduced pain and discomfort, and 47.8% enhanced usual activities. Walking Impairment Questionnaire scores increased significantly in walking distance, speed, and stair-climbing ability (from 31.4 ± 24.7 to 62.5 ± 31.0; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LUMIFOLLOW registry demonstrates that Luminor DCBs are effective and safe for FP interventions. The significant improvement in quality of life and walking ability, along with high primary patency and low complication rates, underscore the benefits of Luminor DCBs in real-world settings. However, the high rate of provisional stenting underscores the need for these devices to be used alongside other endovascular techniques in challenging lesions.

Cilostazol after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (ET) outcomes for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (FP-PAD) remain suboptimal. Cilostazol therapy may improve patency rates and decrease major adverse limb events after ET for FP-PAD. Our goal was to analyze published studies evaluating the use of cilostazol after ET for FP-PAD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized and observational studies (OSs) evaluating cilostazol therapy after ET for FP-PAD. We only included OSs adjusting for confounding variables. We analyzed observational and randomized studies separately and explored heterogeneity by estimating an I2 statistic. A fixed-effects model was chosen if the I2 statistic was low. If the two-sided probability of observing the difference between groups under a true null hypothesis was <5%, we considered this difference statistically significant.

RESULTS

We screened 2171 studies and included 26 papers in our analysis (5 randomized controlled trials and 21 OSs). All randomized studies were open label. In randomized studies, the odds of restenosis were lower in patients treated with cilostazol (pooled odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.43; P < .01; I2 = 0%). The odds of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were also lower in patients treated with cilostazol (pooled odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.65; P < .01; I2 = 0%). In OSs, we also identified associations between peri-interventional treatment with cilostazol and lower rates of restenosis (pooled hazard ratio [pHR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.65; P < .01; I2 = 34%), TLR (pHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; P < .01; I2 = 0%), and amputation (pHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; P = .02; I2 = 30%).

CONCLUSIONS

In randomized open-label studies, peri-interventional treatment with cilostazol after ET for FP-PAD decreased the odds of restenosis and TLR (Level 1A). Similarly, in OSs that adjusted for confounding, peri-interventional cilostazol therapy was associated with lower rates of restenosis, TLR, and amputation (Level 2A).

Plain versus drug balloon and stenting in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-3): open label, three arm, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine which primary endovascular revascularisation strategy represents the most clinically effective treatment for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who require endovascular femoro-popliteal, with or without infra-popliteal, revascularisation.

DESIGN

Three arm, open label, pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 superiority trial (BASIL-3).

SETTING

35 UK NHS vascular units.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required endovascular femoro-popliteal, with or without infra-popliteal, revascularisation.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to femoro-popliteal plain balloon angioplasty with or without bare metal stenting (PBA±BMS), drug coated balloon angioplasty with or without bare metal stenting (DCBA±BMS), or drug eluting stenting (DES) as their first revascularisation strategy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was amputation free survival defined as time to first major amputation or death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included the composite components of the primary outcome, major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, and other prespecified clinical and patient reported outcome measures. Serious adverse events were collected up to 30 days after the first revascularisation procedure.

RESULTS

Between 29 January 2016 and 31 August 2021, 481 participants were randomised (167 (35%) women, mean age 71.8 years (standard deviation 10.8)). Major amputation or death occurred in 106 of 160 (66%) participants in the PBA±BMS group, 97 of 161 (60%) in the DCBA±BMS group, and 93 of 159 (58%) in the DES group (adjusted hazard ratios: PBA±BMS v DCBA±BMS: 0.84, 97.5% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.16, P=0.22; PBA±BMS v DES: 0.83, 0.60 to 1.15, P=0.20). No differences in serious adverse events were reported between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither DCBA±BMS nor DES conferred significant clinical benefit over PBA±BMS in the femoro-popliteal segment in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia undergoing endovascular femoro-popliteal, with or without infra-popliteal, revascularisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN14469736.

Quantifying patients' preferences on tradeoffs between mortality risk and reduced need for target vessel revascularization for claudication

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning that symptomatic relief from claudication using paclitaxel-coated devices might be associated with an increase in mortality over 5 years. We designed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to quantify tradeoffs that patients would accept between a decreased risk of clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CDTVR) and increased mortality risk.

METHODS

Patients with claudication symptoms were recruited from seven medical centers to complete a web-based survey including eight DCE questions that presented pairs of hypothetical device profiles defined by varying risks of CDTVR and overall mortality at 2 and 5 years. Random-parameters logit models were used to estimate relative preference weights, from which the maximum-acceptable increase in 5-year mortality risk was derived.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients completed the survey. On average, patients would accept a device offering reductions in CDTVR risks from 30% to 10% at 2 years and from 40% to 30% at 5 years if the 5-year mortality risk was less than 12.6% (95% CI: 11.8-13.4%), representing a cut-point of 4.6 percentage points above a baseline risk of 8%. However, approximately 40% chose the device alternative with the lower 5-year mortality risk in seven (20.6%) or eight (18.0%) of the eight DCE questions regardless of the benefit offered.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in the study would accept some incremental increase in 5-year mortality risk to reduce the 2-year and 5-year risks of CDTVR by 20 and 10 percentage points, respectively. However, significant patient-level variability in risk tolerance underscores the need for systematic approaches to support benefit-risk decision making.

Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is the third leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity after coronary artery disease and stroke. Lower limb peripheral arterial disease commonly involves infrainguinal arteries, may impair walking ability (intermittent claudication) and may confer a significant risk of limb loss (chronic limb-threatening ischaemia), depending on the severity of ischaemia. Endovascular treatment has become the mainstay revascularisation option in both the femoropopliteal and the below-the-knee arterial segments. After crossing and preparing the lesion, treatment results in these arterial segments can be enhanced by using drug-coated devices (drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons) that mitigate the occurrence of restenosis. As for other medical devices, the use of drug-eluting devices is based on their demonstrated safety and efficacy profiles when applied in the distinct segments of the lower limb vasculature. In this state-of-the-art narrative review we provide an overview of the safety and efficacy of drug-coated devices when used in the femoropopliteal and below-the-knee arterial segments.

Benefits and Challenges of Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice

Multiple clinical trials have reported favorable outcomes after drug-coated balloon therapy for peripheral artery disease in above-the-knee and below-the-knee lesions and in both de novo and in-stent restenosis. However, there are still insufficient data to identify and tackle the risk factors associated with a higher risk of restenosis, which is the primary concern for patients who are treated with an endovascular approach. A modern armamentarium, which includes improved lesion preparation techniques such as plaque modification balloons, mechanical atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, and imaging, is crucial for obtaining better long-term clinical outcomes. Moreover, a better understanding of the molecular properties of drug-coated balloons has led to improved devices that could tackle the shortcomings of previous generations. This comprehensive review focuses on drug-coated balloon technology as a tool to treat peripheral artery disease and the effects of the molecular mechanisms involved in preventing vascular restenosis.

Alleviating iatrogenic effects of paclitaxel via antiinflammatory treatment

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (PTX) is touted as an essential medicine due to its extensive use as a chemotherapeutic agent for various cancers and an antiproliferative agent for endovascular applications. Emerging studies in cardio-oncology implicate various vascular complications of chemotherapeutic agents.

METHODS

We evaluated the inflammatory response induced by the systemic administration of PTX. The investigation included RNAseq analysis of primary human endothelial cells (ECs) treated with PTX to identify transcriptional changes in pro-inflammatory mediators. Additionally, we used dexamethasone (DEX), a well-known antiinflammatory compound, to assess its effectiveness in counteracting these PTX-induced changes. Further, we studied the effects of PTX on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels in the media of ECs. The study also extended to in vivo analysis, where a group of mice was injected with PTX and subsequently harvested at different times to assess the immediate and delayed effects of PTX on inflammatory mediators in blood and aortic ECs.

RESULTS

Our RNAseq analysis revealed that PTX treatment led to significant transcriptional perturbations in pro-inflammatory mediators such as MCP-1 and CD137 within primary human ECs. These changes were effectively abrogated when DEX was administered. In vitro experiments showed a marked increase in MCP-1 levels in EC media following PTX treatment, which returned to baseline upon treatment with DEX. In vivo, we observed a threefold increase in MCP-1 levels in blood and aortic ECs 12 h post-PTX administration. Similar trends were noted for CD137 and other downstream mediators like tissue factor, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and E-selectin in aortic ECs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate that PTX exposure induces an upregulation of atherothrombotic mediators, which can be alleviated with concurrent administration of DEX. Considering these observations, further long-term investigations should focus on understanding the systemic implications associated with PTX-based therapies and explore the clinical relevance of DEX in mitigating such risks.

Device regulation and surveillance in vascular care: Challenges and opportunities

Cardiovascular devices are essential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including cerebrovascular, coronary, valvular, congenital, peripheral vascular and arrhythmic diseases. The regulation and surveillance of vascular devices in real-world practice, however, presents challenges during each individual product's life cycle. Four examples illustrate recent challenges and questions regarding safety, appropriate use and efficacy arising from FDA approved devices used in real-world practice. We outline potential pathways wherein providers, regulators and payors could potentially provide high-quality cardiovascular care, identify safety signals, ensure equitable device access, and study potential issues with devices in real-world practice.

Performance of drug-coated balloons in coronary and below-the-knee arteries: Anatomical, physiological and pathological considerations

Below-the-knee (infrapopliteal) atherosclerotic disease, which presents as chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in nearly 50% of patients, represents a treatment challenge when it comes to the endovascular intervention arm of management. Due to reduced tissue perfusion, patients usually experience pain at rest and atrophic changes correlated to the extent of the compromised perfusion. Unfortunately, the prognosis remains unsatisfactory with 30% of patients requiring major amputation and a mortality rate of 25% within 1 year. To date, randomized multicentre trials of endovascular intervention have shown that drug-eluting stents (DES) increase patency rate and lower target lesion revascularization rate compared to plain balloon angioplasty and bare-metal stents. The majority of these trials recruited patients with focal infrapopliteal lesions, while most patients requiring endovascular intervention have complex and diffuse atherosclerotic disease. Moreover, due to the nature of the infrapopliteal arteries, the use of long DES is limited. Following recent results of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of femoropopliteal and coronary arteries, it was hoped that similar effective results would be achieved in the infrapopliteal arteries. In reality, multicentre trials have failed to support the proposed hypothesis and no advantage was found in using DCBs in comparison to plain balloon angioplasty. This review aims to explore anatomical, physiological and pathological differences between lesions of the infrapopliteal and coronary arteries to explain the differences in outcome when using DCBs.

Safety and Effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization in the Korean Population: A Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) in endovascular revascularization procedures under real-world conditions in a Korean population with atherosclerotic disease of the infrainguinal arteries, including below-the-knee (BTK) arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight institutions in the Republic of Korea participated in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market surveillance study. Two hundred patients with Rutherford class 2-5 peripheral arterial disease and infrainguinal lesions suitable for endovascular treatment were competitively enrolled. Data were collected at baseline, the time of intervention, discharge, and 1-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up visits. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) within 6 months (except when limiting the time frame for procedure- or device-related mortality to within 30 days), and the primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) within 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with 332 target lesions were analyzed. Two-thirds of the patients had diabetes mellitus, and 41.6% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The median target lesion length was 100 mm (interquartile range: 56-133 mm). Of the target lesions, 35.2% were occlusions, and 14.8% were located in the BTK arteries. Rate of freedom from MAE was 97.9% at 6 months, and the rate of freedom from CD-TLR was 95.0% and 92.2% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis of 43 patients and 49 target lesions involving the BTK arteries showed rate of freedom from MAE of 92.8% at 6 months and rates of freedom from CD-TLR of 88.8% and 84.4% at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study, including the BTK subgroup analysis, showed outcomes comparable to those of other DCB studies, confirming the safety and effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux DCB in the Korean population.

Mortality in a Nationwide Practice-Based Cohort Receiving Paclitaxel-Coated Devices for Lower Limb Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

According to a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) for lower limb endovascular revascularization may be associated with increased risk of late mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether PCDs are associated with all-cause mortality in a real-world setting.

METHODS

DETECT is a nationwide, exhaustive retrospective cohort study using medico-administrative data from the French National Healthcare System representing >99% of the population. The main selection criterion was the first procedure of interest: endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease involving ≥1 balloon and/or stent performed between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Patients with or without PCDs were compared for all-cause mortality until December 31, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 259,137 patients were analyzed, with 20,083 (7.7%) treated with ≥1 PCD. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years (Q1-Q3: 2.3-6.4 years), a total of 5,385 deaths/73,923 person-years (PY) (7.3/100 PY) and 109,844 deaths/1,060,513 PY (10.4/100 PY) were observed in the PCD and control groups, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, PCD treatment was associated with a lower risk of mortality in multivariable Cox analyses (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.84-0.89; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed using propensity score matching approaches based on either nearest-neighbor or exact matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide analysis based on large-scale real-world data, exposure to PCDs was not associated with a higher risk of mortality in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease. (The DETECT Project; NCT05254106).

Liquid Drug Delivery Approaches for the Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Local Liquid drug (LLD) delivery devices have recently emerged as a novel approach to treat peripheral arterial disease. This systemic review aims to identify and evaluate the clinical utility of the most commonly used delivery devices.

METHODS

A systemic review was performed using the Medical Subjects Heading terms of "drug delivery," "liquid," "local," and "cardiovascular disease" in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

RESULTS

Four commonly used delivery devices were identified, including (1) the Bullfrog Micro-Infusion Device, (2) the ClearWay RX Catheter, (3) the Occlusion Perfusion Catheter, and (4) the Targeted Adjustable Pharmaceutical Administration. All have shown to successfully deliver liquid therapeutic into the target lesion and have exhibited favorable safety and efficacy profiles in preclinical and clinical trials. The LLD devices have the ability to treat very long or multiple lesions with a single device, providing a more economical option. The safety profile in LLD clinical studies is also favorable in view of recent concerns regarding adverse events with crystalline-paclitaxel-coated devices.

CONCLUSION

There is clear clinical evidence to support the concept of local liquid delivery to treat occlusive arterial disease.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The 'leave nothing behind' strategy has been at the forefront of the most recent innovations in the field of interventional cardiology and vascular interventions. Although drug coated balloons have overcome limitations associated with plain old balloon angioplasty and peripheral stents, recent safety concerns and cost considerations have impacted their usage. In this review, various liquid drug delivery devices are presented, showcasing their capabilities and success in both preclinical and clinical settings. These innovative liquid delivery devices, capable of targeted delivery and their ability to be re-used for multiple treatment sites, may provide solutions for current unmet clinical needs.

Robustness of Longitudinal Safety and Efficacy After Paclitaxel-Based Endovascular Therapy for Treatment of Femoro-Popliteal Artery Occlusive Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were: i) to assess fragility indices (FIs) of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared paclitaxel-based drug-coated balloons (DCBs) or drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus standard endovascular devices, and ii) to meta-analyze mid-term and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from available RCT data while also estimating the FI of pooled results.

METHODS

This systematic review has been registered in the PROSPERO public database (CRD42022304326 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). A query of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE (Excerpta Medical Database), Scopus, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases was performed to identify eligible RCTs. Rates of primary patency (PP) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were assessed as efficacy outcomes, while lower limb amputation (LLA) consisting of major amputation that is. below or above the knee and all-cause mortality were estimated as safety outcomes. All outcomes were pooled with a random effects model to account for any clinical and study design heterogeneity. The analyses were performed by dividing the RCTs according to their maximal follow-up length (mid-term was defined as results up to 2-3 years, while long-term was defined as results up to 4-5 years). For each individual outcome, the FI and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated according to whether the outcome results were statistically significant or not, respectively. The fragility quotient (FQ) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ), which are the FI or RFI divided by the sample size, were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2,337 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There were 2 RCTs examining DES devices and 14 RCTs evaluating different DCBs. For efficacy outcomes, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy increased the PP rate and reduced the TLR rate at mid-term, with a calculated pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.66 for patency (95% CI, 1.55-1.86; P < 0.001), with a corresponding number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 3 patients (95% CI, 2.9-3.8) and RR of 0.44 for TLR (95% CI, 0.35-0.54; P = 0.027), respectively. Similarly, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy both increased PP and decreased TLR rates at long-term, with calculated pooled RR values of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.12-2.61; P = 0.004) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.45-0.62; P = 0.82), respectively. For safety outcomes, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy increased all-cause mortality at mid-term, with a calculated pooled RR of 2.05 (95% CI, 1.21-3.24). However, there was no difference between treatment arms in LLA at mid-term (95% CI, 0.1-2.7; P = 0.68). Similarly, neither all-cause mortality nor LLA at long-term differed between treatment arms, with a calculated pooled RR of 0.66, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.31-3.42) and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.30-5.21; P = 0.22), respectively. The pooled estimates of PP at mid-term were robust (FI = 28 and FQ = 1.9%) as were pooled rates of TLR (FI = 18 and FQ = 0.9%). However, when safety outcomes were analyzed, the robustness of the meta-analysis decreased significantly. In fact, the relationship between the use of paclitaxel-coated devices and all-cause mortality at mid-term showed very low robustness (FI = 4 and FQ = 0.2%). At 5 years, only the benefit of paclitaxel-based devices to reduce TLR remained robust, with an FI of 32 and an FQ of 3.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The data supporting clinical efficacy endpoints of RCTs that examined paclitaxel-based devices in the treatment of femoral-popliteal arterial occlusive disease were robust; however, the pooled safety endpoints were highly fragile and prone to bias due to loss of patient follow-up in the original studies. These findings should be considered in the ongoing debate concerning the safety of paclitaxel-based devices.

Efficacy analysis following polymer coated drug eluting stent and bare metal stent deployment for femoropopliteal arterial disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to assess the performance of the Eluvia polymer coated drug eluting stent (DES) compared to a bare metal stent (BMS) platform in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis. Patients treated with the Eluvia DES (group Eluvia) or the EverFlex BMS (group BMS) for femoropopliteal disease between January 2013 and December 2019 were included. Primary measure outcome of this analysis was the overall mortality. The PTX specific mortality, the primary patency, the amputation free survival (AFS), and the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were additionally evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were treated by BMS deployment, while the Eluvia platform was preferred in 75 subjects. In both groups the majority presented with lifestyle limiting claudication (BMS: 84% vs Eluvia: 73%, p = 0.73). Chronic total occlusions were more frequent in patients treated by BMS (BMS: 71% vs Eluvia: 84%, p = 0.027), whereas the calcification burden (BMS: 81% vs Eluvia: 76%, p = 0.43) and the median lesion length (in mm, IQR) (BMS: 160 (100 to 240) vs Eluvia: 140 (80 to 229), p = 0.17) were comparable. At 24 months, the overall survival (BMS: 93% vs Eluvia: 89%, hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 to 2.64, p = 0.64) and the PTX specific survival (BMS: 95% vs Eluvia: 95%, HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.41 to 4.02, p = 0.67) did not differ significantly between the two platforms. No significant difference was observed regarding the 24 months primary patency rate (BMS: 66% vs Eluvia: 78%, HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.15, p = 0.18), the freedom from TLR (BMS: 83% vs Eluvia: 89%, HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.68, p = 0.572), and the AFS (BMS: 93 vs Eluvia: 89%, HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.55 to 2.64). The Cox regression analysis revealed a higher mortality risk among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.61 to 6.14, p = 0.008), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR: 4.65, 95% CI: 2.14 to 10.09, p = 0.001), in octagenerians (HR: 4.40, 95% CI: 1.92 to 10.44, p = 0.005), and in patients not on statins at baseline (HR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.19 to 4.99, p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, the use of the Eluvia DES did not increase the risk for mortality compared to BMS deployment. CLTI, COPD, advanced age, and the lack of statin therapy at baseline were associated with a higher risk for death.

Long-Term Follow-up and Mortality Rate of Patients of the Randomized Freeway Stent Study

PURPOSE

This follow-up study was designed as a reopen of the completed Freeway Stent Study and collected mortality and clinical outcome data for at least 5 years after enrollment to evaluate long-term patient safety and treatment efficacy. The primary study enrolled 204 patients with stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Patients were randomized to primary nitinol stenting followed by standard PTA or primary nitinol stenting followed by FREEWAY™ paclitaxel-eluting balloon PTA.

METHODS

Previous patients were recontacted by phone or during a routine hospital visit, and medical records were reviewed. Vital and clinical status information was collected.

RESULTS

No increased late mortality was observed at 5 years, with an all-cause mortality rate of 12.0% in the FREEWAY drug-eluting balloon group versus 15.0% in the non-paclitaxel PTA group. No accumulation of any cause of death was observed in either group, nor was there any correlation with the dose of paclitaxel used. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 5 years was significantly higher in the FREEWAY drug eluting balloon group (85.3%) compared to standard PTA group (72.7%) Log-rank p = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

The safety results presented support the recent conclusions that the use of paclitaxel technology does not lead to an increase in mortality. At the same time, the efficacy results clearly demonstrate that the potential benefits of drug-eluting balloon treatment are maintained over a 5-year period.

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038.

FINDINGS

Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.

Mortality in randomised controlled trials using paclitaxel-coated devices for femoropopliteal interventional procedures: an updated patient-level meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices.

METHODS

Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated.

FINDINGS

A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices.

FUNDING

Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical.

Neointima abating and endothelium preserving - An adventitia-localized nanoformulation to inhibit the epigenetic writer DOT1L

Open vascular reconstructions such as bypass are common treatments for cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, neointimal hyperplasia (IH) follows, leading to treatment failure for which there is no approved therapy. Here we combined the strengths of tailoring nanoplatforms for open vascular reconstructions and targeting new epigenetic mechanisms. We produced adhesive nanoparticles (ahNP) that could be pen-brushed and immobilized on the adventitia to sustainably release pinometostat, an inhibitor drug selective to the epigenetic writer DOT1L that catalyzes histone-3 lysine-79 dimethylation (H3K79me2). This treatment not only reduced IH by 76.8% in injured arteries mimicking open reconstructions in obese Zucker rats with human-like diseases but also avoided the shortcoming of endothelial impairment in IH management. In mechanistic studies, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing revealed co-enrichment of the histone mark H3K27ac(acetyl) and its reader BRD4 at the gene of aurora kinase B (AURKB), where H3K79me2 was also enriched as indicated by ChIP-qPCR. Accordingly, DOT1L co-immunoprecipitated with H3K27ac. Furthermore, the known IH driver BRD4 governed the expression of DOT1L which controlled AURKB's protein level, revealing a BRD4- > DOT1L- > AURKB axis. Consistently, AURKB-selective inhibition reduced IH. Thus, this study presents a prototype nanoformulation suited for open vascular reconstructions, and the new insights into chromatin modulators may aid future translational advances.

Application of first-generation high- and low-dose drug-coated balloons to the femoropopliteal artery disease: a sub-analysis of the POPCORN registry

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have significantly changed endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease, in terms of the expansion of indications for EVT for symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). However, whether there is a difference in the performance among individual DCBs has not yet been fully discussed. The present sub-analysis of real-world data from a prospective trial of first-generation DCBs compared the clinical outcomes between high- and low-dose DCBs using propensity score matching methods. The primary endpoint was the restenosis-free and revascularization-free rates at 1 year.

RESULTS

We compared 592 pairs matched for patient and lesion characteristics using propensity score matching among a total of 2,507 cases with first-generation DCBs (592 and 1,808 cases in the Lutonix low-dose and In.PACT Admiral high-dose DCB groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient/lesion characteristics, procedural success rates, or complications between the two groups. First-generation low-dose DCB had significantly lower patency (73.3% [95% confidence interval, 69.6%-77.3%] in the low-dose DCB group versus 86.2% [84.1%-88.3%] in the high-dose DCB group; P < 0.001) and revascularization-free (84.9% [81.9%-88.1%] versus 92.5% [90.8%-94.1%]; P < 0.001) rates. Chronic kidney disease on dialysis, cilostazol use, anticoagulant use, and severe calcification had a significant interaction effect in the association (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT to FPA with first-generation DCBs had inferior low-dose patency outcomes as compared with high-dose outcomes in the present cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Sub analysis of a prospective multicenter study.

Device Effectiveness for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment: An Analysis of K-VIS ELLA Registry

BACKGROUND

Although drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are frequently used for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease, their mid- or long-term clinical efficacy in real-world practice is still limited.

OBJECTIVES

From the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) multicenter registry cohort, clinical outcomes of drug-eluting devices for FPA lesions in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) were evaluated.

METHODS

Limbs that underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for FPA lesions with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA, n = 826), BMS (n = 943), DCBs (n = 778), or DES (n = 227) between 2012 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for confounding.

RESULTS

After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced among groups. Compared with the 2-year cumulative incidence of TLR with BMS (26.5%), the incidence of TLR was significantly lower in limbs treated with DCBs (15.9%; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30-0.64; P < 0.001) or DES (15.9%; HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.87; P = 0.014). No significant differences were observed in the risk of TLR between DCBs vs DES (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.51-1.49; P = 0.613) and POBA vs BMS (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.73-1.21; P = 0.626). All-cause mortality was comparable in the 4 groups. Treatment with DCBs showed a more pronounced favorable outcome in limbs with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II type C/D lesions or long lesions (≥150 mm) compared with POBA, BMS, or DES (P_interaction< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, DCBs and DES demonstrated comparably superior midterm outcomes over POBA or BMS in the treatment of FPA lesions.

Five-Year Independent Patient-Level Mortality Analysis of the Pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

There is a need to evaluate the latest information regarding a potential late safety signal in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices for peripheral artery disease. We evaluated the 5-year all-cause mortality rate of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

Methods

An independent third-party performed a patient-level meta-analysis of the pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was time to death. Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause mortality were compared with the log-rank test. Predictors of mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicated all serious adverse events (including death). The follow-up was 60 months.

Results

A total of 589 patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years (IQR, 4.8, 5.1 years); 419 were randomized to Stellarex DCB and 170 to PTA. Vital status was obtained for 93.8%. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause death were 80.4% (95% CI, 76.7%-84.3%) in the Stellarex DCB arm versus 80.4% (95% CI, 74.3%-86.5%) in the PTA arm (log-rank, P = .7754). There was no difference in all-cause mortality when stratified by paclitaxel dose terciles. Predictors of mortality included renal insufficiency, reference vessel diameter, age, and lesion length, but not paclitaxel dose nor paclitaxel exposure.

Conclusions

There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the Stellarex DCB and PTA through the final 5-year follow-up window of 2 ILLUMENATE randomized controlled trials. These long-term data build on the previously reported safety of the Stellarex DCB for treating symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.

Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease

PURPOSE

To investigate the real-world safety of paclitaxel (PTX)-coated devices for treating lower extremity peripheral artery disease using a commercial claims database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from FAIR Health, the largest commercial claims data warehouse in the United States, were used for this study. The study consisted of patients who underwent femoropopliteal revascularization procedures between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, with PTX and non-PTX devices. The primary outcome was 4-year survival following treatment. The secondary outcomes included 2-year survival, 2- and 4-year freedom from amputation, and repeat revascularization. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding, and the Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

A total of 10,832 procedures were included in the analysis, including 4,962 involving PTX devices and 5,870 involving non-PTX devices. PTX devices were associated with a reduced hazard of death following treatment at 2 and 4 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.69-0.79]; P <.05, and HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77-1.02]; log-rank P =.018, respectively). The risk of amputation was also lower following treatment with PTX devices than with non-PTX devices at 2 and 4 years (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.87]; P =.02, and HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.67-0.89]; log-rank P =.01, respectively). In addition, the odds of repeat revascularization were similar with PTX and non-PTX devices at 2 and 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world commercial claims database, no short- or long-term signal for increased mortality or amputations was observed following treatment with PTX devices.

Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications

Drug-coated balloons are approved outside the United States, not only for the treatment of peripheral arteries but also for coronary arteries. This review describes the technological basics, the scenarios of clinical application, and the current available data from clinical trials for the different coronary indications.

Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent Safety in Patients With Femoropopliteal and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

Background Patients with severe-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded from femoropopliteal disease trials evaluating drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) and bare metal stents (BMSs). We examined the interaction between CKD status and device type for the association with 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation risk. Methods and Results We studied patients undergoing femoropopliteal interventions (September 2016-December 2018) from Medicare-linked VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) registry data. We compared outcomes for: (1) early-stage CKD (stages 1-3) receiving DCB/DES, (2) early-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS, (3) severe-stage (4 and 5) CKD receiving DCB/DES, and (4) severe-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS. We studied 8799 patients (early-stage CKD: 94%; severe-stage: 6%). DCB/DES use was 57% versus 51% in patients with early-stage versus severe-stage CKD. Twenty-four-month mortality risk for patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES (reference) was 21% versus 28% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47 [95% CI, 1.31-1.65]) for those receiving POBA/BMS; patients with severe-stage CKD: those receiving DCB/DES had a 49% (HR, 2.61 [95% CI, 2.06-3.31]) mortality risk versus 52% (HR, 3.64 [95% CI, 2.91-4.55]) for those receiving POBA/BMS (interaction P<0.001). Adjusted analyses attenuated these results. For severe-stage CKD, DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS mortality risk was not significant at 24 months (post hoc comparison P=0.06) but was higher for the POBA/BMS group at 18 months (post hoc P<0.05). Patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES had the lowest 24-month amputation risk (6%), followed by 11% for early-stage CKD-POBA/BMS, 15% for severe-stage CKD-DCB/DES, and 16% for severe-stage CKD-POBA/BMS (interaction P<0.001). DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS amputation rates in patients with severe-stage CKD did not differ (post hoc P=0.820). Conclusions DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS use in patients with severe-stage CKD was associated with lower mortality and no difference in amputation outcomes.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of below-the-knee arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) arterial disease.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted from inception to July 24, 2021. Retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies that had used SESs to treat BTK arterial disease and had reported the primary patency, technical success, target lesion revascularization, and/or mortality were included. Meta-analyses of the proportions were conducted to derive pooled summary statistics of the outcomes. Where Kaplan-Meier curves were provided for primary patency, a meta-analysis of the individual patient data was conducted via a graphic reconstruction tool to estimate primary patency at various follow-up points. For studies comparing SESs and bare metal stents (BMSs), a two-stage meta-analysis was performed to compare the 6-month primary patency of SESs vs BMSs.

RESULTS

Ten studies across 13 publications, including 995 patients, were retrieved for analysis. In the meta-analysis of proportions, across six studies (n = 339 patients), the pooled 6-month primary patency was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.6%-92.1%). Across seven studies (n = 283 patients), the pooled 6-month mortality was 5.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-11.2%). An individual patient data analysis of three studies (n = 282 patients) yielded a primary patency rate of 95.2% (95% CI, 92.7%-97.8%), 82.8% (95% CI, 78.3%-87.6%), 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%), and 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The 12-month target lesion revascularization rate across four studies (n = 324 patients) was 9.6% (95% CI, 6.4%-13.4%). In the two-stage meta-analysis of 6-month primary patency across three studies (n = 168 patients), the use of SESs was significantly favored over BMSs (risk ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall evidence suggests that the use of SESs appears to be safe and offers favorable outcomes for BTK arterial disease compared with BMSs.

Single-Center Study Evaluating Long-Term Major Adverse Outcomes with the Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Treating Infrainguinal Arterial Disease

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCB) have been shown to reduce target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, but recently an association between paclitaxel and an increase in mortality at 5-year was reported. We reviewed the 5-year mortality and freedom from TLR rates from a single center among patients that received DCB. Consecutive patients that received DCB from July 8, 2015 to November 27, 2019 with follow-up obtained from medical records and review of official death certificates were reviewed. The primary objective was total mortality and TLR rates with cumulative exposure to paclitaxel-coated balloons. Demographic, angiographic, clinical, and procedural variables were collected. Causes of mortality were classified according to death certificates. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the total length of DCBs in those who were alive and those who died by the end of study. Kaplan-Meier (KM) was used to plot the freedom from mortality up to 5 years. A total of 91 symptomatic patients received the Lutonix balloon at index to treat femoropopliteal arterial disease and subsequently received either Lutonix or in.PACT during the follow-up phase for additional procedures. Age was 68.4 ± 10.8 years (56.0% males). Critical limb ischemia was present in 20.9%. There was no statistical difference in mortality between the median total number of balloons used among patients who were alive versus those who died (2.5 vs. 3.0, p -value = 0.89). Also, there was no statistical difference in the total length of DCB balloons used between those who were alive and those who died at the end of the study (p-value = 0.39). There were no in-hospital amputation or death. At 5-year follow-up KM freedom from TLR was 78.5%. A total of 13 patients died during follow-up. Of these 10 received only the Lutonix balloon and 3 did receive both Lutonix and In.PACT. The yearly KM freedom from mortality for the Lutonix only cohort were 92.7, 89.1, 85.5, 83.6, and 81.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Freedom from TLR and mortality at 5 years appears to be favorable with the use of DCB, predominantly Lutonix balloon in this cohort. This data needs to be supported prospectively by a larger number of patients.

Outcome after revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) atherosclerotic disease is derived from studies that mainly evaluated patients with claudication. Outcomes of PTX treatment for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is incompletely defined. This study compares outcome in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FPA intervention for an indication of CLTI in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention database from 2016 to 2020. Patients who had concomitant iliac or tibial interventions were included. One limb per patient was studied. Propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, indication, and pharmacological therapy was performed to generate balanced cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression compared limb salvage, overall survival, primary patency, and major adverse limb events (MALE) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, indications, and procedural details were similar between 14,065 PTX and 14,065 non-PTX propensity-matched patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 18-month follow-up demonstrated that the PTX group compared with the non-PTX group had a significantly higher rates of limb salvage (89.2% vs 86.5%; P < .001), primary patency (80.3% vs 76.9%; P < .001), and freedom from MALE (72.6% vs 67.9%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis also showed that PTX treatment was associated with a lower risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82; P < .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87; P < .001), and MALE (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.82; P < .001). Overall, 21% of patients had a prior ipsilateral peripheral vascular intervention. Removing these patients from the analysis yielded similar results at 18 months. Overall survival at 54 months was not statistically different between the PTX and non-PTX groups in the overall cohort (73.5 vs 71.3%; P = .07), but significant in the de-novo treated patients (73.9% vs 70.7%; P = .02).Multivariate analyses showed a lower mortality risk in the PTX patients (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

FPA intervention with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved limb salvage, primary patency, and freedom from MALE at the 18-month follow-up compared with uncoated devices. This benefit was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality out to 4.5 years. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal role for PTX in the treatment of the FPA for patients with CLTI and to understand its long-term outcome.

Vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, an update

Arterial occlusive disease is the leading cause of death in Western countries. Core contemporary therapies for this disease include angioplasties, stents, endarterectomies and bypass surgery. However, these treatments suffer from high failure rates due to re-occlusive vascular wall adaptations and restenosis. Restenosis following vascular surgery is largely due to intimal hyperplasia. Intimal hyperplasia develops in response to vessel injury, leading to inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cells dedifferentiation, migration, proliferation and secretion of extra-cellular matrix into the vessel's innermost layer or intima. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on the origin and mechanisms underlying the dysregulated proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, and we present the new avenues of research targeting VSMC phenotype and proliferation.

Understudied factors in drug-coated balloon design and evaluation: A biophysical perspective

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous interventional therapy allows for durable reopening of the narrowed lumen via physical tissue expansion and local anti-restenosis drug delivery, providing an alternative to traditional uncoated balloons or a permanent indwelling implant such as a conventional metallic drug-eluting stent. While DCB-based treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been incorporated into clinical guidelines, DCB use has been recently curtailed due to reports that showed evidence of increased mortality risk in patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons. Given the United States Food and Drug Administration's 2019 consequent warning regarding PTX-eluting DCBs and the subsequent marked reduction in clinical DCB use, there is now a critical need to better understand the compositional and mechanical factors underlying DCB efficacy and safety. Most work to date on DCB refinement has focused on designing both the enabling balloon catheter and alternate coatings composed of various drugs and excipients, followed by device evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. We contend that improvement in DCB performance will require a better understanding of the biophysical factors operative during and following balloon deployment, and moreover that the elaboration and demonstrated control of these factors are needed to address current concerns with DCB use. This article provides a perspective on the biophysical interactions that govern DCB performance and offers new design strategies for the development of next-generation DCB devices.

Editor's Choice - Real World Study of Mortality After the Use of Paclitaxel Coated Devices in Peripheral Vascular Intervention

OBJECTIVE

This observational cohort study examined outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) with paclitaxel coated devices (PCD) and non-PCD, and evaluated heterogeneity of treatment effect in populations of interest.

METHODS

The study included patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and or stent placement between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2018 in the Vascular Quality Initiative Registry linked to Medicare claims. It determined differences in patient mortality and ipsilateral major amputation after PVI with PCD and non-PCD using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regressions with inverse probability weighting in three cohorts: (A) patients treated for femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal occlusive disease with or without any other concurrent treatment (n = 11 452); (B) those treated for isolated superficial femoral or popliteal artery disease (n = 5 519); and (C) patients with inclusion criteria designed to approximate RCT populations (n = 2 278).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 72.3 (SD = 10.9) years, and 40.6% were female. In cohort A, patients receiving PCD had a lower mortality rate (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.98) than those receiving non-PCD. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups in cohort B (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 - 1.04) and cohort C (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.43). Patients receiving PCD did not have a significantly elevated risk of major amputation compared with those receiving non-PCD (cohort A: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 - 1.00; cohort B: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.06; and cohort C: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.51 - 2.14).

CONCLUSION

No increased patient mortality or major amputation was found at three years after PVI with PCD vs. non-PCD in this large, linked registry claims study, after accounting for heterogeneity of treatment effect by population. The analysis and results from three cohorts intended to mirror the cohorts of previous studies provide robust and niche real world evidence on PCD safety and help to understand and reconcile previously discrepant findings.

A Policy Approach to Reducing Low-Value Device-Based Procedure Use

Policy Points Low-value care is common in clinical practice, leading to patient harm and wasted spending. Much of this low-value care stems from the use of medical device-based procedures. We describe here a novel academic-policymaker collaboration in which evidence-based clinical coverage for device-based procedures is implemented through prior authorization-based policies for Louisiana's Medicaid beneficiary population. This process involves eight steps: 1) identifying low-value medical device-based procedures based on clinical evidence review, 2) quantifying utilization and reimbursement, 3) reviewing clinical coverage policies to identify opportunities to align coverage with evidence, 4) using a low-value device selection index, 5) developing an evidence synthesis and policy proposal, 6) stakeholder engagement and input, 7) policy implementation, and 8) policy evaluation. This strategy holds significant potential to reduce low-value device-based care.

Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Disease Compared to Balloon Angioplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.

Results

Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).

Conclusions

Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.

Safety and Efficacy of All Comers Treated with a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for Below Knee Intervention

OBJECTIVE

Data on paclitaxel coated balloons (PCBs) for below knee (BTK) angioplasty exhibited conflicting efficacy results, and previous meta-analyses suggested an increased mortality and amputation risk highlighting the need for further research. The aim of this study was to investigate safety and efficacy of PCBs for BTK interventions in a real world cohort.

METHODS

Within a single centre cohort study, 552 consecutive patients were included undergoing BTK interventions with and without PCB use. Two year safety and efficacy results were compared in unadjusted and propensity score matched (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

BTK interventions were performed in 157 patients with PCB angioplasty (100% Lutonix 0.014 inch drug coated balloon; Bard Lutonix, New Hope, MN, USA) and 395 patients with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). The majority of interventions (> 70%) were performed for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Mean lesion length was 20.8 ± 12.6 cm; 61.2% in the PCB and 66.7% in the POBA group were occlusions. In the PCB group, more procedures were performed for re-stenotic lesions than POBA (28.5 vs. 17.2%). In PSM analysis (128 matched pairs), the primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD TLR), which occurred in 70.1% in the PCB and 73.1% in the POBA group at one year (p = .85; McNemar test). Survival analysis suggested lower rates of major amputations in the PCB group in unadjusted (94.4% ± 2.1 vs. 89.2% ± 1.9 in the POBA group) and PSM analyses (97.2% ± 1.6 vs. 89.3% ± 3.5) through two years, while no differences were seen for CD TLR and all cause mortality between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this all comer analysis, PCBs were found to be safe for BTK interventions with a signal towards lower amputation rates but no benefit was seen for repeat revascularisation.

Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries, which caused enormous controversy and debates globally. This study aims to further evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices by incorporating the most recently published data.

Methods

We searched for candidate studies in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) online databases, government web archives and international cardiovascular conferences. Safety endpoints of interest included all-cause mortality rates at one, two and five years and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the summary measure. The primary analysis was performed using random-effects models to account for potential clinical heterogeneity.

Findings

Thirty-nine RCTs including 9164 patients were identified. At one year, the random-effects model yielded a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI [0.87, 1.29]) indicating no difference in short-term all-cause deaths between the paclitaxel and control groups (crude mortality, 4.3%, 214/5025 versus 4.5%, 177/3965). Two-year mortality was reported in 26 RCTs with 382 deaths out of 3788 patients (10.1%) in the paclitaxel arm and 299 out of 2955 patients (10.1%) in the control arm and no association was found between increased risk of death and usage of paclitaxel-coated devices (RR 1.08, 95% CI [0.93, 1.25]). Eight RCTs recorded all-cause deaths up to five years and a pooled RR of 1.18 (95% CI [0.92, 1.51]) demonstrated no late mortality risk due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices (crude mortality, paclitaxel 18.2%, 247/1360 versus control 15.2%, 122/805).

Conclusions

We found no significant difference in either short- or long-term all-cause mortalities between patients receiving paclitaxel-coated and uncoated devices. Further research on the longer-term safety of paclitaxel usage (e.g., 8- or 10-year) is warranted.

Registration

PROSPERO, CRD42021246291.

Bindarit encapsulated nanoparticles prevent venous neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis in a murine angioplasty model

Monocyte and macrophage recruitment occur to the injured vessel wall after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of stenotic arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) through increased expression of MCP-1 leading to venous neointimal hyperplasia (VNH) and venous stenosis (VS). We hypothesized that adventitial delivery of Bindarit, an oral selective inhibitor of MCP-1, -2, and -3 encapsulated in poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles embedded in a thermosensitive Pluronic F127 hydrogel (BN NP) could prevent VNH/VS formation in a murine model of PTA with AVF. Scanning electron microscope and dynamic light scattering were used to characterize the BN NP and control nanoparticles (NP C). Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to study drug release kinetics. Immediately after PTA, in a murine model of AVF stenosis, BN NP or NP C was administrated to the adventitia of outflow veins. Animals were sacrificed 3 and 21 days later for gene expression, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical analyses. Doppler ultrasound was performed weekly. There was no difference in the size and storage modulus of BN NP compared to controls. The pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated increased drug release from BN NP when compared to controls. BN NP-treated vessels had reduced MCP-1, MCP-2, and MCP-3 gene, and protein levels, reduced macrophage/monocyte abundance, proinflammatory cytokines, and venous fibrosis resulting in positive vascular remodeling and improved patency with reduced VNH/VS. There was increased peak velocity 21 days after PTA in the BN NP group. Adventitial administration of BN NP to the outflow vein after PTA results in decreased VNH/VS.

Long-Term Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis and De Novo Lesions: The Novara-Biella-Trento (NOBITRE) Registry

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of in-stent restenosis or particular anatomical subsets. We provide a real-world analysis of the prognostic determinants and long-term outcomes of patients treated with DCB for any lesion in a comprehensive multicenter registry. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow-up. We included 267 patients (196 treated for in-stent restenosis and 71 for de novo lesions), with a median follow-up of 616 [368–1025] days. MACE occurred in 70 (26.2%) of the patients and related with higher rates of in-stent restenosis (P = .04), longer and more type C lesions ( P = .05 and P = .04). At multivariate Cox-regression, type C lesions emerged as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.83[1.13–2.97], P = .014), mainly driven by target vessel revascularization (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.78[1.05–2.95], P = .03) not conditioning survival. In-stent restenosis emerged as major determinant of TLF (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 2.59[1.17–5.75], P = .02). DCBs represent a treatment option for any lesion; however, type C and restenotic lesions are associated with an increased risk of MACE and target lesion failure, where the optimal strategies for patients’ selection and lesion preparation are still undefined.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty : 5-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EffPac Trial

Purpose

This study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB).

Materials and Methods

The EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants.

Results

Kaplan–Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34).

Conclusions

Primary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).

Use of paclitaxcel-coated balloons in clinical setting is not associated with increased mortality compared to plain balloon angioplasty in femoropopliteal lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mortality and causes of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) compared to plain balloon (PB) angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent percutaneous femoropopliteal artery angioplasty without stenting between years 2014 and 2020. Patients were stratified into PCB and PB groups according to the index procedure. Those who had undergone any prior or subsequent intervention using drug-eluting technology were excluded from the PB group. Long-term survival was estimated up to 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for all-cause mortality were assessed in a multivariable analysis. Causes of death were retrieved from a national registry.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients treated with PB and 190 with PCB. Patients treated with PCB had higher prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease (27% vs 17%; P=0.02) and were less often on anticoagulant therapy (34% vs 48%; P=0.01) compared to patients in the PB group. Those treated with PB were more likely to have chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; 82% vs 72%; P=0.04). Ipsilateral perioperative amputation rate was significantly higher in the PB group (7% vs 1%; P=0.01). There were no major differences in other 30-day outcomes between the groups and no differences in the rates of reinterventions and ipsilateral amputations during a mean follow-up time of 2.7±1.9 years. Survival at 1-year in the PCB group was 83±3% compared to 73±4% in the PB group (P=0.0001). The 5-year survival estimates were 56±5% and 37±5%, respectively. PCB use was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.97). Independent risk factors for increased mortality were age (HR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.02-1.06), cardiac insufficiency (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.12-2.27), chronic renal insufficiency (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.47-2.85), anticoagulation therapy (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.34) and CLTI (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.51-5.39). In the PCB group, 63% of deaths were due to cardiovascular causes compared to 42% in the PB group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCB is safe and there is no concern of increased mortality after the procedure based on the 5-year survival estimates.