Morning and Evening Home Blood Pressure and Risks of Incident Stroke and Coronary Artery Disease in the Japanese General Practice Population

Association of plasma homocysteine with morning blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension

Previous studies have shown that morning blood pressure elevation increases stroke risk. Homocysteine levels are linked to stroke, but the benefit of lowering them alone for stroke is unclear. We aimed to explore the correlation between plasma homocysteine levels and morning blood pressure. 1056 hypertensive patients who were hospitalized and received ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were enrolled in the study. Morning hypertension was defined as the average of blood pressure ≥135/85 mmHg during the morning period of ABPM recording. Spearman's correlation analysis, logistic regression models, subgroup analysis were performed to investigate whether homocysteine levels were independently associated with morning hypertension. Both morning systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure increased with the rise of homocysteine levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further determined that homocysteine levels were an independent risk factor for morning hypertension: with the lowest tertile group as a reference, middle tertile group: odds ratio (OR): 2.394, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.554-3.687; highest tertile group: OR: 4.432, 95% CI: 2.549-7.706. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.745. In subgroup analysis, it was found that the association of homocysteine levels with morning hypertension was stronger in hypertensive patients who were older than 60 years old, female, with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, with a history of stroke. The plasma homocysteine levels are correlated with morning blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension, particularly among those who are older than 60 years, have a history of stroke, are female and have a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

The prognostic impact of home blood pressure measurements in patients with stage B heart failure

Although hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CVD) events in stage B heart failure (HF), data on the prognostic value of home blood pressure (BP) measurements in stage B HF are limited. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 568 patients with stage B HF and at least one cardiovascular risk factor who underwent home BP monitoring. Stage B HF was defined as BNP ≥ 35 pg/mL or NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL, Troponin T > 0.014 ng/mL, LVEF < 50%, enlarged left ventricular dimensions in diastole (men: ≥60 mm; women: ≥54 mm), enlarged left atrium (men: >40 mm; women: >38 mm), or increased left ventricular mass (men: >115 g/m2; women: >95 g/m2). Office hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg. Home BP was measured in the morning, evening, and nighttime; morning/evening home hypertension was defined as ≥135 mmHg and nighttime home hypertension as ≥120 mmHg. During a mean follow-up of 7.8 ± 3.6 years, 66 CVD events occurred. An unadjusted Cox regression model gave the following hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CVD-events risk in patients with office, morning, evening, and nighttime home hypertension: HR 1.69 (95% CI 1.03-2.78), 1.73 (1.02-2.95), 1.44 (0.89-2.33) and 2.33 (1.34-4.04), respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for significant variables, the association with CVD events remained only for nighttime home hypertension (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.06-3.38), not other hypertension types. In conclusion, hypertension defined based on nighttime home BP was associated with CVD-events risk in stage B HF patients.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a prespecified subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study by age subgroup

This predefined subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to determine whether the comparative efficacy and safety of esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide differs with age. Patients were divided into two age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years). The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was assessed based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) changes. Esaxerenone was considered non-inferior if this value was <3.9/ < 2.1 mmHg; if it was <0 mmHg, esaxerenone was considered superior in its BP-lowering effect. The results showed that the least squares mean changes in morning home SBP/DBP from baseline to the end of treatment (primary endpoint) were -9.5/-5.7 with esaxerenone and -8.2/-4.9 mmHg with trichloromethiazide (between-group difference: -1.3 [95% CI, -3.3, 0.8]/-0.8 [ - 2.1, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged <65 years. These changes were -14.6/-7.2 and -11.5/-6.7 (-3.0 [-4.9, -1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged ≥65 years. The incidences of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L were 2.2% and 1.9% in the esaxerenone-treated subgroups aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. In conclusion, esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged <65 years, esaxerenone achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering both SBP and DBP. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone was superior to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP and achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering DBP. The impact of esaxerenone on serum potassium levels did not show a specific age-related effect. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) showed that esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone achieved the superiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP.

Home blood pressure-based treatment with hypertension specialists: a better strategy for overcoming uncontrolled blood pressure

Schematic illustration of home BP-based treatment supported by hypertension specialists to overcome clinical inertia. The combination of support and feedback from hypertension specialists to patients and primary care physicians may improve the antihypertensive efficacy of HBPM. BP blood pressure, HBPM home blood pressure monitoring.

Home blood pressure stability score is associated with better cardiovascular prognosis: data from the nationwide prospective J-HOP study

A home blood pressure (BP)-centered strategy is emerging as the optimal approach to achieve adequate BP control in individuals with hypertension, but a simple cardiovascular risk score based on home BP level and variability is lacking. This study used prospective data from the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) extended study to develop a simple home BP stability score for the prediction of cardiovascular risk. The J-HOP extended study included 4070 participants (mean age 64.9 years) who measured home BP three times in the morning and evening for 14 days at baseline. During the mean 6.3-year follow-up, there were 260 cardiovascular events. A home BP stability score was calculated based on the average of morning and evening systolic BP (SBP; MEave), and three home BP variability metrics: average real variability (average absolute difference between successive measurements); average peak (average of the highest three SBP values for each individual), and time in therapeutic range (proportion of time spent with MEave home SBP 100-135 mmHg). There was a curvilinear association between the home BP stability score and the risk of cardiovascular events. Compared with individuals in the optimal home SBP stability score group (9-10 points), those in the very high-risk group (0 points) had significantly higher cardiovascular event risk during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 3.97, 95% confidence interval 2.22-7.09; p < 0.001), independent of age, sex, medication, cardiovascular risk factors, and office BP. These data show the potential for a simple home BP-based score to predict cardiovascular event risk in people with hypertension.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a predefined subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled trial by basal calcium channel blocker versus angiotensin receptor blocker

This prespecified subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to examine the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide as a second-line antihypertensive agent according to the basal antihypertensive agent used (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or calcium channel blocker [CCB]). The primary endpoint, change in morning home systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) from baseline to end of treatment was similar between the two groups (intergroup difference in least squares mean change [95% confidence interval]: -1.3 [-3.8, 1.3]/-0.2 [-1.6, 1.3] mmHg for ARB; -2.7 [-4.2, -1.2]/-0.8 [-1.7, 0.1] mmHg for CCB). The respective incidences of serum potassium levels <3.5 mEq/L and ≥5.5 mEq/L in the ARB subgroup were 3.4% and 4.2% for esaxerenone and 7.9% and 0% for trichlormethiazide; in the CCB subgroup, they were 2.8% and 0.6% for esaxerenone and 13.9% and 1.2% for trichlormethiazide, respectively. The incidence of uric acid level ≥7.0 mg/dL was numerically higher in the trichlormethiazide group than the esaxerenone group in both the ARB and CCB subgroups. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP was demonstrated regardless of whether the basal antihypertensive agent was an ARB or CCB. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns. Serum potassium levels tended to be higher when esaxerenone was combined with an ARB than with a CCB, but this can be mitigated if administered according to the package insert. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to basal antihypertensive agent demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP regardless irrespective of the basal antihypertensive agent. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns.

Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT)

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly prescribed as first- and second-line treatments for older Japanese patients with hypertension. However, due to age-related decline in renin activity, the effectiveness of ARBs may decrease. This highlights the need for other antihypertensive agents to be used in combination with CCBs to replace ARBs for more effective blood pressure (BP) control. The ESCORT-HT study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study with a 4-week run-in period and 12-week treatment period. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esaxerenone as a second-line treatment for hypertension and to determine whether its BP-lowering effect is noninferior to that of ARBs in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension on CCB monotherapy. The safety profiles of esaxerenone and ARBs will also be evaluated. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either esaxerenone or an ARB. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the change from baseline in morning home systolic BP at the end of the treatment period. The BP-lowering effect of esaxerenone will be considered noninferior to that of ARBs if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic BP change between esaxerenone and ARB is <3.8 mmHg, and will be considered superior if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI is <0. The findings may elucidate the possible benefits of earlier use of mineralocorticoid receptor blockers in combination with CCBs in older patients with essential hypertension.

Effect of living in well-insulated warm houses on hypertension and cardiovascular diseases based on a nationwide epidemiological survey in Japan: a modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are more prevalent in colder homes, partly due to cold-induced high blood pressure (BP). While thermal insulation and heating are rational strategies to mitigate cold exposure, the high initial and running costs pose significant barriers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of living in well-insulated warm houses.

Methods

An economic model was developed based on the indoor temperature-BP and BP-CVDs relationships. Five scenarios were outlined: a base scenario (Scenario 0: the most prevalent thermal insulation level (Grade 2) and indoor temperature (15°C) in Japan), two scenarios of upgrading insulation and living in warm houses after age 40 years (Scenario 1-1: Grade 4 & 18°C and Scenario 1-2: Grade 6 & 21°C), and two scenarios of retrofitting insulation of entire houses and living in warm houses after age 60 years (Scenario 2-1: Grade 4 & 18°C and Scenario 2-2: Grade 6 & 21°C). Monte Carlo simulations for 100 000 virtual husband-wife pairs were conducted to investigate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-cycle costs for thermal insulation work, heating and medical treatments.

Results

Regarding the upgrading insulation scenarios, compared with Scenario 0, Scenarios 1-1 and 1-2 increased the life-cycle cost by Japanese yen (JPY) 0.26 and JPY0.84 million, respectively, while extending the combined healthy life expectancy of a husband and wife by 0.31 and 0.48 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were below the threshold value of JPY5 million/QALY gained. Regarding the retrofitting insulation scenarios, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that Scenario 2-2 emerged as the most cost-effective option when the willingness to pay reached JPY6.5 million or more, which is above the threshold.

Conclusions

Upgrading insulation and residing in warmer homes could be cost-effective strategies. When conducting insulation retrofitting, lower-cost methods such as partial insulation retrofitting should be considered. These findings support decision-making for residents and policymakers.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profiles in Asia

High blood pressure (BP) remains a major health problem globally, with a proportion of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) increasing worldwide including in Asia region. Cardiovascular (CV), cerebral and kidney diseases related to hypertension were reported to be closely associated with morning surge and nocturnal hypertension-a subset of BP variability-which can be detected by out-of-office BP measurement. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and Home BP monitoring (HBPM) have been recommended by major guidelines to be used in the evaluation of BP variability and outcomes' prediction of hypertension patients. However, an interesting profile of ABPM in Asia has been reported and hypothesized to correlate with different outcomes. This review will focus on the current recommendation of ABPM use by the guidelines, the major different profiles of ABPM in Asia as compared to Western countries according to clinical indications, and the challenges in implementing optimal use of ABPM in Asian countries based on available evidence.

Differences in ambulatory versus home blood pressure levels by ethnicity: data from the United Kingdom and Japan

This study tested the hypothesis that differences in ethnicity impact the level of agreement between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and home BP (HBP) levels. A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the UK and Japan was performed. Participants underwent office BP, daytime ABP, and HBP measurements. The ABP-HBP difference was compared between ethnic groups by multiple linear regression analysis. Diagnostic disagreement was defined as a disparity between the hypertension diagnoses obtained using ABP and HBP, since both measures share common thresholds of 135/85 mmHg for hypertension. Definite diagnostic disagreement was assigned where such a difference exceeded ±5 mmHg for either systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP). A total of 1 408 participants (age 62.1 ± 11.1 years, 48.6% males, 78.9% known hypertensive, White British 18.9%, South Asian 11.2%, African Caribbean 12.0%, Japanese 58.0%) were eligible. More Japanese participants showed higher ABP than HBP compared to White British: SBP + 3.09 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) + 1.14, +5.04 mmHg; DBP + 5.67 mmHg, 95%CI + 4.51, +6.84 mmHg. More Japanese participants than African Caribbean participants exhibited diagnostic disagreement in SBP (33.2% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, Japanese participants had a higher percentage of definite diagnostic disagreement in SBP compared to White British (9.3% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.040) and African Caribbean participants (9.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.018). In conclusion, Japanese participants showed greater disparity between ABP and HBP compared to White British participants. Complementary use of ABP and HBP monitoring may be more beneficial for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in Japanese participants compared to other ethnic groups.

Aortic stiffness: an age-related prognostic marker?

Aortic stiffness, a consequence of vascular aging, is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the impact of age and sex on its predictive performance remains unclear. We have included 6046 individuals from the population-based Rotterdam study. Survival analyses were performed to investigate the impact of age and sex on the link between aortic stiffness and outcomes, including coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The added predictive value of aortic stiffness across age categories and by sex was assessed by using explained variation, Harrell's C index and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). Aortic stiffness was independently associated with all outcomes [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval; CI): 1.16 (1.04-1.22) for CHD, 1.09 (1.00-1.19) for stroke, 1.11 (1.05-1.18) for CVD, 1.14 (1.05-1.23) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.08 (1.03-1.13) for all-cause mortality]. The strength of the association between aortic stiffness and stroke, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality decreased significantly by advancing age. The variance of the outcome (R2) explained by aortic stiffness alone was noticeable in individuals younger than 60 years and negligible in the other age categories. The association of aortic stiffness and CHD was stronger in women than in men. Similarly, the difference in R2 between women and men was greater for CHD than for the other considered outcomes. Our findings suggest that the gain in explained variation caused by aortic stiffness for CVD and mortality might be limited to individuals younger than 60 years.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: (1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or (2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

What are the ideal metrics for assessing the quality of long-term stabilized "perfect" 24-h BP control after renal denervation?

A significant number of individuals being treated for hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). In Japan, renal denervation (RDN) is being introduced into clinical practice as an adjunctive treatment for hypertension that is uncontrolled despite adequate lifestyle changes and maximal antihypertensive drug therapy. The pivotal SPYRAL ON-MED trial showed that there was a significant reduction in trough office and nighttime ambulatory BP values in the RDN group compared with sham control group, although 24-h and daytime BP values were not significantly different between the two groups. The trough office BP measurement (taken before morning antihypertensive dosing) is similar to guideline recommendations for taking morning home BP before taking the morning antihypertensive drug dose. Recent guidelines recommend the measurement of nighttime BP because nighttime BP is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular event risk than daytime BP. It is particularly important to assess nighttime BP in medicated individuals with hypertension because the up- or down-titration of antihypertensive drug dosing is primarily based on office and daytime BPs in clinical practice. This means that there may be significant risk relating to nocturnal hypertension during longer follow-up. Because RDN results in persistent, "always-on" 24-h BP-lowering effects, the best BP metrics to assess the potential benefit of RDN are nighttime BP (determined using home or ambulatory BP monitoring) and morning BP (determined using home BP monitoring or morning trough office BP measurement). The variability of office, home, and ambulatory BP values is another important metric to assess the quality of RDN-related BP lowering.

Factors influencing the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in hypertensive patients: a pooled analysis of five clinical studies on different comorbidities

This study aimed to identify factors associated with a strong home blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of esaxerenone and the incidence of elevated serum potassium levels in hypertensive patients treated with esaxerenone. A pooled analysis of five multicenter, prospective, open-label single-arm studies was conducted, including 479 patients in the full analysis set (FAS) and 492 patients in the safety analysis set. Multivariate linear regression analysis of morning home systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) changes from baseline to Week 12 in the FAS (primary endpoint) showed that male sex (estimated change 4.37 mmHg), office pulse rate ≥100 beats/min (25.10 mmHg), and calcium channel blocker (CCB) use as a basal antihypertensive agent (4.53 mmHg) were significantly associated with a positive estimated change (weaker BP-lowering effect) in morning home SBP. CCB use (3.70 mmHg) was associated with a positive estimated change in morning home DBP. Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to <300 mg/gCr (-4.13 mmHg) was significantly associated with a negative estimated change (stronger BP-lowering effect) in morning home SBP. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated baseline serum potassium level (≥4.5 vs < 4.5 mEq/L, odds ratio 13.502) was significantly associated with a high incidence of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L after esaxerenone treatment. In conclusion, factors associated with a strong BP-lowering effect of esaxerenone were female sex and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors as a basal antihypertensive drug. Patients with baseline serum potassium levels ≥4.5 mEq/L had an increased risk of developing elevated serum potassium levels (≥5.5 mEq/L) after esaxerenone treatment.

Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Relationships of Office, Ambulatory, and Self-measured Blood Pressure With Cardiac, Renal, and Atherosclerotic Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Previous studies with several limitations have comparatively analyzed the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and self-measured BP and biomarkers of organ damage. This study extends this line of research by examining the relationship between ambulatory and self-measured BP and cardiac, renal, and atherosclerotic biomarkers in outpatients at cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

In 1,440 practice outpatients who underwent office, ambulatory, and self-measured BP monitoring, we assessed the relationships of each BP with organ damage biomarkers including b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV).

RESULTS

In the comparison of correlation, self-measured systolic BP (SBP) was more strongly correlated to log-transformed (Ln) BNP (n = 1,435; r = 0.123 vs. r = -0.093, P < 0.001), LVMI (n = 1,278; r = 0.223 vs. r = 0.094, P < 0.001), Ln-UACR (n = 1,435; r = 0.244 vs. r = 0.154, P = 0.010), and baPWV (n = 1,360; r = 0.327 vs. r = 0.115, P < 0.001) than daytime ambulatory SBP. In the linear regression models including office, ambulatory, and self-measured SBP, only self-measured SBP was significantly related to Ln-BNP (P = 0.016) and LVMI (P < 0.001). In the logistic regression models for the top quartile of LVMI, adding self-measured SBP improved the model predictability (P = 0.027), but adding daytime ambulatory SBP did not. However, adding daytime ambulatory SBP improved the model predictability in the logistic model for the top quartile of baPWV including office and self-measured SBP (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study findings suggested that self-measured BP was associated with cardiac biomarkers independent of ambulatory BP.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, esaxerenone, versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study

The EXCITE-HT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus thiazide diuretics (trichlormethiazide) as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change between groups was below 3.9/2.1 mmHg. A total of 295 and 290 patients were included in the esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was demonstrated: least squares mean change differences in morning home SBP/DBP at end of treatment (EOT) were -2.2 (95% CI, -3.6, -0.8) mmHg for SBP/-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) mmHg for DBP. Morning home, bedtime home, and office BP significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) from baseline to EOT in both groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from baseline to Week 12 in both groups, with no notable intergroup difference. Serum potassium elevations occurred more frequently with esaxerenone, while serum potassium reductions occurred more with trichlormethiazide. Uric acid elevations were observed in both groups, but more frequently with trichlormethiazide than esaxerenone. No cases of gout occurred in this study. Reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate were similarly observed in both groups. EXCITE-HT is the first randomized controlled study to demonstrate evidence that esaxerenone is non-inferior to trichlormethiazide as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension, with no new safety concerns. The EXCITE-HT study demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in its morning home blood pressure lowering effect and safety profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension who were previously treated with an angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker.

Home blood pressure measurement days and changes in urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio, estimated salt and potassium intakes and blood pressure: 1-year prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Current international guidelines recommend home blood pressure (BP) measurement and low sodium and high potassium intakes for the management of hypertension. We hypothesized that increased home BP measurement may result in more effective management of sodium and potassium intakes and BP.

METHODS

We examined associations of home BP measurement days with changes in the urinary sodium-to-potassium (Na/K) ratio, estimated salt and potassium intakes and BP. We included 209 healthy participants (mean age, 55.9 years; 56.5% women) from a prospective cohort study. We examined 1-year data on self-measured home BP and spot urine samples.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) days of home BP measurement was 324 (225-358) over 1-year. Baseline mean (SD) Na/K ratio, salt and potassium intakes, morning and evening SBP, and morning and evening DBP were 3.8 (2.3), 8.5 (1.9) g/day, 1833.5 (416.5) mg/day, 120.4 (14.0) mmHg, 118.2 (14.2) mmHg, 79.2 (10.1) mmHg, and 76.2 (10.1) mmHg, respectively. In multivariable-adjusted linear regression , β (standard error) per 10 days increase in number of home BP measurement were -0.031 (0.017) for Na/K ratio, -0.036 (0.015) for salt intake, -1.357 (2.797) for potassium intake, -0.178 (0.064) for morning SBP, -0.079 (0.041) for morning DBP, -0.109 (0.067) for evening SBP and -0.099 (0.045) for evening DBP. Additionally, relationships persisted for men and women, but changes in salt intake were more pronounced among participants taking antihypertensive medication (interaction P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Continuous measurement of home BP may lead not only to self-monitoring of BP, but also to declines in salt intakes and some BP indices.

Cumulative blood pressure predicts risk of stroke in individuals with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To determine whether cumulative blood pressure (BP) could predict stroke in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

BP levels at baseline and the initial three visits were obtained from individuals participating in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial who had not experienced a stroke. Cumulative elevations in BP were assessed by adding the weighted mean BP values at various time intervals. The association of cumulative BP with stroke was evaluated by a multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 8282 participants were included (62.10% males and 37.90% females; mean age, 62.73 years). With a median follow-up period of 6.36 years, 324 (3.91%) and 305 (3.68%) patients had any and nonfatal stroke events, respectively. Only baseline systolic BP (SBP) independently predicted any stroke after adjustment for potential confounders, whereas cumulative SBP and pulse pressure independently predicted elevated stroke events. A strong dose-response relationship between cumulative BP and stroke was identified, and conventional risk factors combined with cumulative SBP improved prediction efficiency.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative SBP independently predicts stroke in individuals with T2D and provides an incremental predictive value for stroke compared with baseline BP assessments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000620).

Systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome: from hypothesis to evidence

Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between blood pressure (BP) and CVD events has been based on mean BP alone. BP variability (BPV) is associated with increased organ damage and CVD events independently or beyond average home BP. To explain this association, we propose the systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS) hypothesis. The SHATS hypothesis indicates that hemodynamic stress increases vascular disease and vice versa, leading to a vicious cycle of the association between hemodynamic stress and a vascular disease; this association provides not only the risk but also the trigger for CVD events. The evidences of SHATS were gradually accumulating. We showed arterial stiffness synergistically amplified the association between hemodynamic stress and cardiac overload / CVD events in patients with at least one CVD risk factor.

Prognosis of a malignant phenotype of obesity defined by a cardiac biomarker in hypertension: the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study

Obesity with increased high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) has been reported to be more likely to progress cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, which suggests that hs-cTnT may identify a "malignant" phenotype of obesity. We classified 3513 hypertensive patients from the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study into groups based on body mass index (BMI) (normal weight: <25 kg/m2, overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m2, obesity: ≥30 kg/m2) and elevations in biomarker levels (hs-cTnT ≥3 ng/mL: 51.3%, 54.9%, 53.3%, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-ProBNP] ≥55 pg/mL: 51.1%, 40.7%, 36.0% in each BMI category). We evaluated the independent and combined associations of BMI and each hs-cTnT/NT-proBNP or both with CVD events (fatal and nonfatal coronary artery disease, stroke, and hospitalized heart failure). During the mean 6.4 ± 3.9-year follow-up, 232 CVD events occurred. Obesity with elevated hs-cTnT was associated with a risk of CVD events compared to normal weight without elevated hs-cTnT (hazard ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-5.68). A similar pattern of results was also observed across the status of obesity and elevated NT-proBNP. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT and CVD events according to the obesity status (p = 0.039), while this association was marginal in NT-proBNP (p = 0.060). The magnitude of the mediation of hs-cTnT for the association between obesity and CVD risk was 41.2%, and that for NT-proBNP was 8.1%. In this Japanese hypertensive population, the elevation of hs-cTnT identified obese patients at particularly high risk for developing CVD events, suggesting that hs-cTnT may identify a 'malignant' phenotype of obesity.

Nighttime blood pressure and glucose control impacts on left ventricular hypertrophy: The Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) Study

Several studies investigated the association between nighttime blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in diabetes, but since most of these studies were conducted in diabetes populations only, they did not compare differences in the impact of nighttime BP on LVH in subjects without diabetes. Moreover, data about the impact of glucose control in diabetes on the relationship between nighttime BP and LVH are sparse. We classified 1277 adults (age 64.7 ± 11.8 years) performing ambulatory BP monitoring while enrolled as part of the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study into groups according to the control status of daytime BP (systolic BP [SBP] < 135 mmHg or ≥135 mmHg), nighttime BP (SBP < 120 mmHg or ≥120 mmHg), and diabetes (HbA1c < 7.0% or ≥7.0%). LVH was assessed by echocardiography. LVH according to echocardiographic criteria was identified in 33.7% of the participants. The group with poorly controlled diabetes plus uncontrolled nighttime BP (n = 90) had a 2.1-fold higher risk of LVH compared to the group with controlled nighttime BP and non-diabetes (n = 505) (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-3.44). No association was observed between uncontrolled daytime BP and diabetes for LVH. In the participants with poorly controlled diabetes (n = 146), uncontrolled nighttime BP posed a 3.1-fold higher risk of LVH compared to controlled nighttime BP (OR 3.12, 95%CI: 1.47-6.62). This association was not found in controlled diabetes. Uncontrolled nighttime BP was associated with a risk of LVH, especially among individuals with poorly controlled diabetes.

Home blood pressure measurement consistency and cognitive impairment

Cognitive function tends to decline with age, and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often have difficulty completing established self-management tasks. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the number of days within a 5-and-a-half-day period that patients took their home blood pressure (BP) as instructed and MCI assessed by the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) in an elderly clinical population. We analyzed 303 ambulatory patients (mean age 77.3 ± 8.2 years) in whom MoCA-J had been assessed, who were instructed to take home BP for 1 evening and twice a day for the next five days, and who had at least one morning home BP measurement. After accounting for patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, drinking, smoking, prevalent cardiovascular disease, morning systolic BP and diastolic BP, and the use of antihypertensive drugs, the number of days home BP was measured was independently associated with both total MoCA-J score (estimate, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.21; P < 0.001) and the lowest quartile of MoCA-J score (13 or below) (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95%CI, 0.59-0.87; P = 0.001). Home BP measurement noncompliance (<5 days' measurement) was also independently associated with the total MoCA-J score (estimate, -2.56; 95%CI, -4.09 to -1.03; P = 0.001) and the lowest quartile of MoCA-J score (OR, 3.32; 95%CI, 1.59-6.96; P = 0.001). In conclusion, poor compliance with home BP monitoring was associated with cognitive impairment in elderly cases who had been specifically instructed to perform home BP monitoring during a designated period.

Agreement Between Guideline Thresholds Using an "All-in-One" Device to Measure Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressures

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) thresholds for diagnosing and managing hypertension vary for office, home, and ambulatory readings, and between guideline documents. This analysis determined corresponding office, home, and ambulatory BP thresholds using baseline data from the HI-JAMP (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) study, which used a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 2322 treated patients with hypertension who underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days were analyzed. Corresponding BP thresholds for office, home, and ambulatory measurements were determined using Deming regression. Values equivalent to office systolic BP (SBP) of 120 and 140 mm Hg were as follows: 115.9 and 127.7 mm Hg for 24-hour ambulatory SBP; 120.8 and 134.0 mm Hg for daytime ambulatory SBP; 104.9 and 117.9 mm Hg for nighttime ambulatory SBP; and 122.0 and 134.2 mm Hg for morning-evening average home SBP. Deming regression showed that morning-evening average home SBP and daytime ambulatory SBP were almost the same (home SBP=0.99×daytime ambulatory SBP+0.27 mm Hg; r=0.627). Morning-evening average home SBP values of 120 and 135 mm Hg were equivalent to daytime ambulatory SBP values of 119.1 and 133.9 mm Hg, respectively. A home SBP threshold of 130 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 123.5 and 113.6 mm Hg, whereas a home SBP threshold of 135 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 128.0 and 119.2 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory and home BP thresholds in this analysis were similar to those proposed by existing guidelines. The similarity between the home BP and daytime ambulatory BP thresholds was a clinically relevant finding.

Comparison of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Variability for Cardiovascular Prognosis and Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Although blood pressure variability (BPV) is reported to be associated with cardiovascular prognoses, it has not been established whether ambulatory BPV (ABPV; ie, short-term 24-hour BPV) or home BPV (HBPV; day-to-day BPV) is a superior clinical marker.

METHODS

We analyzed the associations of ABPV and HBPV with cardiovascular prognoses and biomarkers in 1314 hypertensive outpatients who underwent both home and ambulatory BP measurements in the J-HOP study (Japan Morning-Surge Home Blood Pressure). BPV was evaluated by the SD, coefficient of variation, and average real variability of the patients' 24-hour ambulatory and home systolic BP values.

RESULTS

During the median 7.0-year follow-up, 109 cardiovascular events occurred. All SD, coefficient of variation, and average real variability values of the HBPV were significantly associated with cardiovascular risk even after adjusting by average 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP and each ABPV value: 1 SD of hazard ratio (95% CI) for the SD, 1.36 (1.14-1.63); coefficient of variation, 1.38 (1.16-1.66); and average real variability 1.29 (1.10-1.51) of HBPV. The ABPV parameters did not exhibit comparable relationships. The cardiovascular risk spline curves showed a trend toward increased risks with increasing HBPV parameters. There were no differences between ABPV and HBPV in the relationships with B-type natriuretic peptide and the urine albumin-creatine ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparative analysis of ambulatory and home BP monitoring values in individuals with hypertension, ABPV was not significantly associated with cardiovascular prognosis adjusted by average BP level, and HBPV was suggested to have modest superiority in predicting cardiovascular prognosis compared with ABPV.

Home blood pressure-centered approach - from digital health to medical practice: HOPE Asia Network consensus statement 2023

Recent innovations in digital technology have enabled the simultaneous accumulation, and the linking and analysis of time-series big data relating to several factors that influence blood pressure (BP), including biological indicators, physical activity, and environmental information. Various approaches can be used to monitor BP: in the office/clinic; at home; 24-h ambulatory recording; or with wearable and cuffless devices. Of these, home BP monitoring is a reliable and convenient method, and is recommended for hypertension management by current national and international guidelines. This recommendation is based on evidence showing that home BP is an important predictor of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney disease in patients with hypertension. In addition, lifetime personalized health record (PHR)-based home BP with telemonitoring combined with co-interventions has been shown to lower BP more effectively than the traditional approach based on office BP. Thus, home BP represents a key metric for personalized anticipation medicine, from digital healthcare to digital medicine. This paper summarizes the latest evidence on home BP monitoring and proposes a Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network consensus on a home BP-centered approach to the management of hypertension.

Digital hypertension towards to the anticipation medicine

"Digital Hypertension" is a new research field proposed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension that integrates digital technology into hypertension management and proactively promotes research activities. This novel approach includes the development of new technologies for better BP management, such as sensors for detecting environmental factors that affect BP, information processing, and machine learning. To facilitate "Digital Hypertension," a more sophisticated BP monitoring system capable of measuring an individual's BP more frequently in various situations would be required. With the use of these technologies, hypertension management could shift from the current "dots" management based on office BP readings during clinic visits to a "line" management system based on seamless home BP or individual BP data taken by a wearable BP monitoring device. DTx is the innovation to change hypertension management from "dots" to "line", completely achieved by wearable BP.

Lipids, Blood Pressure, and Diabetes Mellitus on Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in East Asians: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and impaired glycemic control are well-established cardiovascular risk factors in Europeans, but there are comparatively few studies focused on East Asian populations. This study evaluated the potential causal relations between traditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease risk in East Asians through a 2-sample Mendelian randomization approach. We collected summary statistics for blood pressure parameters, lipid subsets, and type 2 diabetes mellitus liability from large genome-wide association study meta-analyses conducted in East Asians and Europeans. These were paired with summary statistics for ischemic heart disease (IHD), ischemic stroke (IS), peripheral vascular disease, heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed univariable Mendelian randomization analyses for each exposure-outcome pair, followed by multivariable analyses for the available lipid subsets. The genetically predicted risk factors associated with IHD and AF were similar between East Asians and Europeans. However, in East Asians only genetically predicted elevated blood pressure was significantly associated with IS (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.06, p <0.0001) and HF (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.06, p <0.0001), whereas nearly all genetically predicted risk factors were significantly associated with IS and HF in Europeans. In conclusion, this study provides supportive evidence for similar causal relations between traditional cardiovascular risk factors and IHD and AF in both East Asian and European ancestry populations. However, the identified risk factors for IS and HF differed between East Asians and Europeans, potentially highlighting distinct disease etiologies between these populations.

Evening home blood pressure and pulse rate: age-specific associations with nocturia severity

Previous studies have reported a significant relationship between hypertension and nocturia. However, the underlying pathophysiology associated with pulse rate (PR) remains unclear. In the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study, a self-administered nocturia questionnaire and evening home blood pressure (BP) and PR measurements (taken on a mean of 11.2 days) were performed on 4310 patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors (mean: 64.9 years old; 47% male). According to the number of nighttime voids, the study population was divided into three groups (no voids: n = 2382; 1 void: n = 847; ≥2 voids per night: n = 1082). In the multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders, diuretic use (OR, 1.23; 95%CI, 1.01-1.50; p < 0.05) was significantly associated with one nocturnal void, whereas evening home systolic BP (SBP) (OR per 1 SD, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.05-1.24; p < 0.01) and evening home PR (OR per 1 SD, 1.12; 95%CI: 1.02-1.24; p < 0.05) were significantly associated with multiple nocturnal voids. In the younger group (<65 years), only evening home PR was significantly related to multiple nighttime voids (p < 0.01), whereas in the older group (≥65 years), only evening home SBP was significantly related to multiple nighttime voids (p = 0.02). In this study, both higher evening home PR and higher evening home SBP were associated with multiple nighttime voids, with the former playing a greater role in the younger participants, and the latter more often associating the older group. An age-stratified approach to reduce the burden of BP or PR might be important to improve sleep quality.

Prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring in patients under antihypertensive treatment

The prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has been investigated in several studies in the general population, demonstrating its independent association with cardiovascular events. However, in the case of treated hypertensive subjects, evidence is controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of HBPM in this population. Medicated hypertensive patients who performed a 4-day HBPM (Omron® HEM-705CP-II) between 2008 and 2015 were followed up for a median of 5.9 years, registering the occurrence of a composite primary outcome of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. Cox regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value of HBPM, considering 4-day measurements, discarding the first day, and analyzing morning, afternoon and evening periods separately. We included 1582 patients in the analysis (33.4% men, median age 70.8 years, on an average of 2.1 antihypertensive drugs). During follow-up, 273 events occurred. HBPM was significantly associated with cardiovascular events in all five scenarios in the unadjusted models. When adjusting for office BP and other cardiovascular risk factors, the association remained marginally significant for the 4-day period, discarding first-day measurements HBPM (HR 1.04 [95% CI 1-1.1] and 1.04 [95% CI 1-1.1], respectively) and statistically significant for all separate periods of measurement: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.01-1.72); 1.33 (95% CI 1.02-1.72); and 1.30 (95% CI 1.01-1.67), for morning, afternoon and evening, respectively. When analyzing separately fatal and non-fatal events, statistical significance was held for the former only. In conclusion, HBPM is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in hypertensives under treatment.

Peak home blood pressure as an earlier and strong novel risk factor for stroke: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP study extended

While home blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended for hypertension management, the clinical implications of peak home BP values have not been well studied. This study investigated the association between pathological threshold or frequency of peak home BP and cardiovascular events in patients with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor. The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study enrolled participants from 2005-2012 with extended follow-up from December 2017 to May 2018, which generated the dataset for this analysis. Average peak home systolic BP (SBP) was defined as average of the highest three BP values on 14-day measurement period. Patients were divided into quintiles of peak home BP, and the risk of stroke, coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD; stroke+CAD) was determined. In 4231 patients (mean 65 years) followed for 6.2 years there were 94 strokes and 124 CAD events. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for the risk of stroke and ASCVD in patients with average peak home SBP in the highest versus lowest quintile was 4.39 (1.85-10.43) and 2.04 (1.24-3.36), respectively. Risk was greatest for stroke in the first 5 years: HR 22.66 (2.98-172.1). The pathological threshold of average peak home SBP for 5-year stroke risk was 176 mmHg. There was a linear association between the number of times peak home SBP > 175 mmHg and stroke risk. Peak home BP was a strong risk factor for stroke, especially within the first 5 years. We propose exaggerated peak home SBP > 175 mmHg as an early and strong novel risk factor for stroke.

Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus trichlormethiazide in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: EXCITE-HT study

The next-generation mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (MRB) esaxerenone has favorable antihypertensive effects in patients who do not respond to treatment with first-line antihypertensive agents and may be beneficial as a second-line treatment. However, MRBs are currently considered a fourth-line treatment as there is no clinical evidence comparing the efficacy of esaxerenone with other classes of antihypertensive agents. The multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone as a second-line agent in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. After a 4-week run-in period, patients will receive either esaxerenone or trichlormethiazide for 12 weeks per the package insert and the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. At Weeks 4 and 8, the dose of esaxerenone or trichlormethiazide may be increased. Blood pressure (home [morning and bedtime] and office), serum biomarkers, and urinary biomarkers will be measured. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline in morning home systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure to the end of treatment. The EXCITE-HT study is expected to validate the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide and provide the first evidence for the early use of esaxerenone as a second-line agent in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension instead of its current use as a fourth-line agent.

Impact of diabetic status and contribution of office and home blood pressure across diabetic status for cardiovascular disease: the J-HOP study

Few studies have investigated whether the prognostic power of home blood pressure (BP) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events differs across subjects with different diabetic status. We used the dataset of the J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) study, which enrolled patients having cardiovascular risks to investigate relationships between home BP and CVD events. We classified the patients as having diabetes mellitus (DM), prediabetes or normal glucose metabolism (NGM) as follows: for DM, a self-reported history of physician-diagnosed DM and/or use of DM medication, a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL, a casual plasma glucose level ≥200 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% (n = 1034); for prediabetes, HbA1c of 5.7-6.4% (n = 1167), and for NGM, those who remained (n = 2024). CVD outcome was defined as coronary artery disease, stroke or heart failure. During a median 6.2 ± 3.8 years of follow-up, 259 CVD events occurred. Analysis found both prediabetes (Unadjusted Hazard ratio [uHR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.95), and DM (uHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.59-2.85) as risks of CVD compared to NGM. In DM, patients with a 10-mmHg elevation of office systolic BP (SBP) and morning home SBP had 16% and 14% higher risks for CVD events. In the prediabetes group, only an elevated morning home SBP conferred a risk of CVD events (uHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31), but this association did not hold for the adjusted model. Like DM, prediabetes should be recognized as a risk for CVD events, albeit weakly. Elevated home BP contributes to increased CVD risk in diabetes. Our study demonstrated the impact of prediabetes and diabetes on CVD and the impact of office and home BP on CVD events in each group.

Difference between morning and evening blood pressure at home and nocturnal hypoxia in the general practitioner-based J-HOP study

The aim of this study was to determine the independent association of nocturnal hypoxia with morning minus evening home blood pressure (MEdif) in a cohort of outpatients with at least one cardiovascular risk. A total of 1053 participants underwent home blood pressure (BP) portable pulse oximetry measurements, and 147 (14%) had an MEdif ≥20 mmHg, where MEdif was defined as the difference between morning and evening home systolic BP. When participants were divided into quartiles according to the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO₂) during the nighttime, those in the lowest quartile (range, 54-79%) were significantly more likely to have MEdif ≥20 mmHg than those in the top quartile (range, 89-97%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.49). The present study revealed an association between lowest SpO₂ during the nighttime and increased MEdif in a cohort of outpatients with at least one cardiovascular risk.

Current situation of telemedicine research for cardiovascular risk in Japan

Hypertension continues to be a principal risk factor for the occurrence of cardiovascular disorders, stroke, and kidney diseases. Although more than 40 million subjects suffer from hypertension in Japan, its optimal control is achieved only a subpopulation of patients, highlighting the need for novel approaches to manage this disorder. Toward the better control of blood pressure, the Japanese Society of Hypertension has developed the Future Plan, in which the application of the state-of-art information and communication technology, including web-based resources, artificial intelligence, and big data analysis, is considered as one of the promising solutions. In fact, the rapid advance of digital health technologies, as well as ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, has triggered the structural changes in the healthcare system globally, increasing demand for the remote delivery of the medical services. Nonetheless, it is not entirely clear what evidence exists that support the widespread use of telemedicine in Japan. Here, we summarize the current status of telemedicine research, particularly in the field of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. We note that there have been very few interventional studies in Japan that clearly showed the superiority or noninferiority of telemedicine over standard care, and that the methods of online consultation considerably varied among studies. Clearly, more evidence is necessary for wide implementation of telemedicine in hypertensive patients in Japan, and also those with other cardiovascular risk factors.

Association of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Cardiovascular Prognosis in Practice Hypertensive Outpatients

BACKGROUND

Although international guidelines for hypertension management recommend home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, few studies have assessed which is more useful in predicting cardiovascular incidence in hypertensive outpatients.

METHODS

We analyzed the association of home and ambulatory BP with cardiovascular prognosis in 1336 practice outpatients with hypertension who underwent both home and ambulatory BP measurements in the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure).

RESULTS

During the median 6.9 years of follow-up, 111 cardiovascular events occurred. Both home and ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) were associated with cardiovascular risk independent of office SBP (hazard ratio [95% CI] per 20 mm Hg of average morning and evening home SBP, 1.46 [1.11-1.93]; 24-hour ambulatory SBP, 1.41 [1.02-1.94]). Moreover, average morning and evening home SBP was also associated with cardiovascular risk even adjusted by 24-hour ambulatory SBP (hazard ratio [95%CI] per 20 mm Hg, 1.38 [1.01-1.87]), but 24-hour ambulatory SBP was not associated with cardiovascular risk adjusted by average morning and evening home SBP. Regarding this relationship, the model-fit was significantly improved by using the analysis of likelihood ratio, but that was not significant in the analysis using C statistics. Additionally, even in patients with well-controlled 24-hour ambulatory BP, uncontrolled morning home BP was associated with cardiovascular risks (hazard ratio [95% CI], 2.15 [1.02-4.50]). In patients with well-controlled average morning and evening home BP, uncontrolled ambulatory BP was not associated with cardiovascular risks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the prognostic values of home and ambulatory BP in practice hypertensive outpatients. Our findings indicated the modest superiority of home BP compared to ambulatory BP to predict cardiovascular prognosis.

Concept, study design, and baseline blood pressure control status of the nationwide prospective HI-JAMP study using multisensor ABPM

The Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (HI-JAMP) study is a nationwide general practitioner-based cohort of medicated hypertensive patients that began in 2017. The primary objective of this study is to clarify which blood pressure (BP) measure is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease: office, home, or ambulatory BP. To this end, we used a newly developed ICT-based multisensor ambulatory BP monitoring (IMS-ABPM) device (TM-2441; A&D Company), which can also be used for home BP monitoring and is equipped with a high-sensitivity actigraph, a thermometer, and a barometer. This is the first study to evaluate three hemodynamic properties under resting home and active ambulatory conditions using the same device: (1) BP variability; (2) trigger-specific BP sensitivity to physical activity, temperature, and atmospheric pressure; and (3) central hemodynamics. A total of 2754 patients were enrolled, and 2731 patients with the required number of ambulatory BP readings (at least 6 daytime and 3 nighttime readings) were included in the final analysis. The overall patient group showed worse control of morning and nighttime BPs compared to office and daytime BPs, and the control rate was also poor among patients with a higher number of antihypertensive drugs. In conclusion, the baseline data of the HI-JAMP study demonstrated that morning home and nighttime BP remain difficult to control even among patients taking two or more hypertensive agents. By simultaneously considering office, home, and ambulatory BPs, the HI-JAMP study will contribute to the development of hypertension management strategies and new BP indices.