Prognostic Significance of the Sodium Channel Blocker Test in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

The diagnostic role of pharmacological provocation testing in cardiac electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC, the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), the Paediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

The pharmacological provocation test is a pivotal tool in cardiac electrophysiology for the diagnosis of potential causes of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), arrhythmias, symptoms, or ECG abnormalities. The 2022 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death offered guidance on provocation testing but did not describe the indications and requirements in depth. This clinical consensus statement, led by the European Heart Rhythm Association and approved by major international stakeholders, aims to advise the general cardiologist and the arrhythmia expert who to test and when, where, and how to do it. The statement focuses on current practice for the diagnosis of subclinical arrhythmia syndromes and the causes of SCA, building upon the recommendations of the Guidelines. We address the sodium channel blocker provocation test for patients suspected of Brugada syndrome as well as the use of epinephrine, isoproterenol, adenosine, ergonovine, and acetylcholine.

Spontaneous type 1 ECG and arrhythmic risk in Brugada syndrome: A meta-analysis of adjusted time-to-event data

Background

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with an increased risk of major arrhythmic events (MAEs), particularly in patients with a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern.

Objective

Because previous meta-analyses used mainly crude or unadjusted data from observational studies, we conducted an updated meta-analysis on the prognostic role of spontaneous type 1 ECG in BrS patients combining adjusted and unadjusted data separately.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 2024. Studies providing hazard ratios for MAEs associated with spontaneous type 1 ECG in BrS patients were included.

Results

Eighteen studies comprising 7238 patients were included, with 10 providing adjusted and 17 providing unadjusted data. Separate pooled analyses using a random-effects model demonstrated a significantly increased risk of MAEs in BrS patients with spontaneous type 1 ECG compared with those without, with a pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.05 (95% CI 1.38-3.03) and an unadjusted hazard ratio of 2.97 (95% CI 2.04-4.34). Subgroup analysis revealed higher risks in studies with non-Asian populations and those including patients with no history of aborted cardiac arrest (aHR 2.36, 95% CI 1.35-4.11; and aHR 3.56, 95% CI 2.35-5.41, respectively) and a persistent significant risk in studies accounting for syncope as a covariate (aHR 2.01, 95% CI 1.24-3.27).

Conclusion

Our analysis indicates that patients with BrS and spontaneous type 1 ECG are at higher risk of MAEs. This is consistent across various subgroups, including asymptomatic individuals.

Clinical Management of Brugada Syndrome: Commentary From the Experts

Although there is consensus on the management of patients with Brugada Syndrome with high risk for sudden cardiac arrest, asymptomatic or intermediate-risk patients present clinical management challenges. This document explores the management opinions of experts throughout the world for patients with Brugada Syndrome who do not fit guideline recommendations. Four real-world clinical scenarios were presented with commentary from small expert groups for each case. All authors voted on case-specific questions to evaluate the level of consensus among the entire group in nuanced diagnostic and management decisions relevant to each case. Points of agreement, points of controversy, and gaps in knowledge are highlighted.

Deep learning unmasks the ECG signature of Brugada syndrome

One in 10 cases of sudden cardiac death strikes without warning as the result of an inherited arrhythmic cardiomyopathy, such as Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Normal physiological variations often obscure visible signs of this and related life-threatening channelopathies in conventional electrocardiograms (ECGs). Sodium channel blockers can reveal previously hidden diagnostic ECG features, however, their use carries the risk of life-threatening proarrhythmic side effects. The absence of a nonintrusive test places a grossly underestimated fraction of the population at risk of SCD. Here, we present a machine-learning algorithm that extracts, aligns, and classifies ECG waveforms for the presence of BrS. This protocol, which succeeds without the use of a sodium channel blocker (88.4% accuracy, 0.934 AUC in validation), can aid clinicians in identifying the presence of this potentially life-threatening heart disease.

Quelling the Storm: A Review of the Management of Electrical Storm

Heightened sympathetic input to the myocardium potentiates cardiac electrical instability and may herald an electrical storm. An electrical storm is characterized by 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate internal cardiac defibrillator shocks within 24 hours. Management of electrical storms is resource-intensive and inevitably requires careful coordination between multiple subspecialties. Anesthesiologists have an important role in acute, subacute, and long-term management. Identifying the phase of an electrical storm and understanding the characteristics of each morphology may help the anesthesiologist anticipate the management approach. In the acute phase, management of an electrical storm is aimed at providing advanced cardiac life support and identifying reversible causes. After initial stabilization, subacute management focuses on dampening the sympathetic surge with sedation, thoracic epidural, or stellate ganglion blockade. Definitive long-term management with surgical sympathectomy or catheter ablation also may be warranted. Our objective is to provide an overview of electrical storms and the anesthesiologist's role in management.

Heart rate variability and microvolt T wave alternans changes during ajmaline test may predict prognosis in Brugada syndrome

PURPOSE

Drug-induced type I Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with a ventricular arrhythmia (VA) rate of 1 case per 100 person-years. This study aims to evaluate changes in electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters such as microvolt T wave alternans (mTWA) and heart rate variability (HRV) at baseline and during ajmaline testing for BrS diagnosis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS during ajmaline testing with 5-year follow-up were included in this study. For comparison, a negative ajmaline control group and an isoproterenol control group were also included. ECG recordings during ajmaline or isoproterenol test were divided in two timeframes from which ECG parameters were calculated: a 5-min baseline timeframe and a 5-min drug timeframe.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients with BrS were included, 22 (0.7%) of which suffered VAs during follow-up. One hundred patients were included in both isoproterenol and negative ajmaline control groups. At baseline, there was no difference in ECG parameters between control groups and patients with BrS, nor between BrS with and without VAs. During ajmaline testing, BrS with VAs presented longer QRS duration [159 ± 34 ms versus 138 (122-155) ms, p = 0.006], higher maximum mTWA [33.8 (14.0-114) µV versus 8.00 (3.67-28.2) µV, p = 0.001], and lower power in low frequency band [25.6 (5.8-53.8) ms² versus 129.5 (52.7-286) ms², p < 0.0001] when compared to BrS without VAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ajmaline induced important HRV changes similar to those observed during isoproterenol. Increased mTWA was observed only in patients with BrS. BrS with VAs during follow-up presented worse changes during ajmaline test, including lower LF power and higher maximum mTWA which were independent predictors of events.

Brugada syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmia syndrome that causes a heightened risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. BrS is characterised by a coved ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads. The prevalence is estimated to range between 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 2,000 in different populations, with the highest being in Southeast Asia and in males. More than 18 genes associated with BrS have been discovered and recent evidence has suggested a complex polygenic mode of inheritance with multiple common and rare genetic variants acting in concert to produce the BrS phenotype. Diagnosis of BrS in patients currently relies on presentation with a type-1 Brugada pattern on ECG either spontaneously or following a drug provocation test using a sodium channel blocker. Risk assessment in patients diagnosed with BrS is controversial, especially with regard to the predictive value of programmed electrical stimulation and novel ECG parameters, such as QRS fragmentation. The first line of BrS therapy remains an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), although radiofrequency catheter ablation has been shown to be an effective option in patients with contraindications for an ICD. True BrS can be unmasked on ECG in susceptible individuals by monitoring factors such as fever, and this has been recently evident in several patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Aggressive antipyretic therapy and regular ECG monitoring until fever resolves are current recommendations to help reduce the arrhythmic risk in these COVID-19 patients. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, genetics, clinical diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with BrS, with special emphasis on COVID-19 comorbidity.

Clinical characterization of the first Belgian SCN5A founder mutation cohort

AIMS

We identified the first Belgian SCN5A founder mutation, c.4813 + 3_4813 + 6dupGGGT. To describe the clinical spectrum and disease severity associated with this mutation, clinical data of 101 SCN5A founder mutation carriers and 46 non-mutation carrying family members from 25 Belgian families were collected.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The SCN5A founder mutation was confirmed by haplotype analysis. The clinical history and electrocardiographic parameters of the mutation carriers and their family members were gathered and compared. A cardiac electrical abnormality was observed in the majority (82%) of the mutation carriers. Cardiac conduction defects, defined as PR or QRS prolongation on electrocardiogram (ECG), were most frequent, occurring in 65% of the mutation carriers. Brugada syndrome (BrS) was the second most prevalent phenotype identified in 52%, followed by atrial dysrythmia in 11%. Overall, 33% of tested mutation carriers had a normal sodium channel blocker test. Negative tests were more common in family members distantly related to the proband. Overall, 23% of the mutation carriers were symptomatic, with 8% displaying major adverse events. As many as 13% of the patients tested with a sodium blocker developed ventricular arrhythmia. One family member who did not carry the founder mutation was diagnosed with BrS.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of symptoms and sensitivity to sodium channel blockers in our founder population highlights the adverse effect of the founder mutation on cardiac conduction. The large phenotypical heterogeneity, variable penetrance, and even non-segregation suggest that other genetic (and environmental) factors modify the disease expression, severity, and outcome in these families.

Spatiotemporal differences in precordial electrocardiographic amplitude before and after flecainide provocation are associated with a history of unstable ventricular arrhythmia in Brugada syndrome

INTRODUCTION

A drug provocation test (DPT) is important for the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BrS). The link, however, between dynamic changes of electrocardiography (ECG) features after DPT and unstable ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in BrS remains unknown.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2019, we assessed 27 patients with BrS (median age: 37.0 [interquartile range, IQR: 22.0-51.0] years; 25 men), including 9 (33.3%) with a history of unstable VA and 18 (66.7%) without. All patients in the study presented with Brugada-like ECG features before DPT. The ECG parameters and dynamic changes (∆) in 12-lead ECGs recorded from the second, third, and fourth intercostal spaces (ICS) before and at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after DPT (oral flecainide 400 mg) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The total amplitude of V₁ at the third ICS 18 and 24 h after DPT was significantly lower in patients with a history of unstable VA than in those without. Patients with BrS and unstable VAs had a significantly larger ∆ amplitude of V₁ at the second ICS 12 h after DPT than in those without unstable VAs (0.28 [0.18-0.41] mV vs. 0.08 [0.01-0.15] mV, p = .01). A multivariate analysis revealed that the amplitude of V₁ at the third ICS 18 and 24 h after DPT and the ∆ amplitude of V₁ at the second ICS 12 h after DPT were associated with a history of unstable VA.

CONCLUSION

Nonuniform changes and spatiotemporal differences in precordial ECG features after DPT were observed in patients with BrS and these may be surrogate markers for risk stratification.

Suspected Brugada Phenocopy Secondary to Coronary Slow Flow

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic condition that accentuates the risk of potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a structurally normal heart. The Brugada electrocardiographic pattern may manifest separately from the syndrome—this clinical scenario has been described as Brugada phenocopy (BrP). Many etiologies of BrP have been reported, but it has not yet been reported as a result of coronary slow flow (CSF) phenomenon. This case report highlights a suspected coronary slow flow-associated Brugada type 1 electrocardiographic pattern, which subsequently normalized following the institution of guideline-directed medical therapy for acute coronary syndrome.

Clinical approach to the patient with Brugada Syndrome: risk stratification and optimal management

The Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac ion channel disorder associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Diagnosis is based on a characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern of coved type ST-segment elevation >2 mm followed by a negative T-wave in ≥1 of the right precordial leads V1 to V3. Since the first description of BrS, the definition of disease and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms have been significantly improved in recent years. Also, significant progress has been made in the field of genetic testing in these patients. Still, there are several open questions regarding the management and outcome of these patients. There is more information about patients who would need an implantable cardiac defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (that is, those with spontaneous Type I Brugada ECG pattern and arrhythmia-related syncope), but currently published data concerning asymptomatic patients with Brugada ECG pattern and other less-well defined presentations are conflicting. Whereas the role of cardiac defibrillator in patients with Brugada Syndrome is clear, optimal use of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy needs to be further investigated. In this review, we summarize current evidence and contemporary management of patients with BrS.

Suspected hyponatremia-induced Brugada phenocopy

Brugada syndrome is a genetic condition that predisposes to an increased risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death in a structurally normal heart. The Brugada type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern may occur independently of the actual syndrome, and this clinical phenomenon is often referred to as Brugada phenocopy. There are several other factors which have been known to induce this electrocardiographic pattern, and currently, there is a paucity of literature with respect to the pattern that is observed in patients with electrolyte disturbances, specifically hyponatremia. This case report highlights a suspected hyponatremia-induced Brugada type 1 ECG pattern, which subsequently normalized following resolution of the electrolyte derangement.