Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Experience in 100 Consecutive Patients

Evolutions in Combined Heart-Kidney Transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes management practices, outcomes, and allocation policies in candidates for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT).

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with heart failure and concomitant kidney disease, SHKT confers a survival advantage over heart transplantation (HT) alone in patients with dialysis dependence or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. However, when compared to kidney transplantation (KT) alone, SHKT is associated with worse patient and kidney allograft survival. In September 2023, the United Network of Organ Sharing adopted a new organ allocation policy, with strict eligibility criteria for SHKT and a safety net for patients requiring KT after HT alone. While the impact of the policy change on SHKT outcomes remains to be seen, strategies to prevent and slow development of kidney disease in patients with heart failure and to prevent kidney dysfunction after HT and SHKT are necessary.

New UNOS allocation system associated with no added benefit in waitlist outcomes and worse post-transplant survival in heart-kidney patients

BACKGROUND

The 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart transplant policy change (PC) sought to improve waitlist risk stratification to decrease waitlist mortality and promote geographically broader sharing for high-acuity patients awaiting heart transplantation. Our analysis sought to determine the effect of the UNOS PC on outcomes in patients waiting for, or who have received, a heart-kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We analyzed adult (≥18 years old), first-time, heart-only and heart-kidney transplant candidates and recipients from the UNOS Registry. Patients were divided into pre-PC (PRE: October 18, 2016-May 30, 2018) and post-PC (POST: October 18, 2018-May 30, 2020) groups for comparison. Competing risks analysis (subdistribution and cause-specific hazards analyses) was performed to assess for differences in waitlist death/deterioration or heart transplantation. One-year post-transplant survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. We included an interaction term (policy era × heart ± kidney) in our analyses to evaluate the effect of PC on outcomes in heart-kidney patients.

RESULTS

One-year post-transplant survival was similar (p = 0.83) for PRE heart-kidney and heart-only recipients, but worse (p < 0.001) for POST heart-kidney vs heart-only recipients. There was a policy-era interaction between heart-kidney and heart-only recipients (HR 1.92[1.04,3.55], p = 0.038) indicating a detrimental effect of policy on 1-year survival in POST vs PRE heart-kidney recipients. No added beneficial effect of PC on waitlist outcomes in heart-kidney vs heart-only candidates was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no added policy-era benefit on waitlist outcomes for heart-kidney candidates when compared to heart-only candidates. POST heart-kidney recipients experienced worse 1-year survival compared to PRE heart-kidney recipients with no policy effect on heart-only recipients.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant compared with heart transplant alone in patients with borderline renal function who are not dialysis dependent

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients who are not dependent on dialysis receiving simultaneous heart kidney transplantation versus heart transplantation alone (HTA) to identify optimal eGFR threshold where combined transplant strategy may be superior.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 7896 adult patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/minute from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received HTA or simultaneous heart kidney transplant between 2005 and 2021, excluding those who received pretransplant dialysis. Subjects were further stratified into 3 groups based on chronic kidney disease stage at time of transplant: Stage 3A (eGFR 45-59 mL/minute; n = 5044), Stage 3B (eGFR 30-44 mL/minute; n = 2193), and Stage 4 or 5 (eGFR <30 mL/minute; n = 659). Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiac allograft failure, and freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant following heart transplant.

RESULTS

Simultaneous heart kidney transplant and HTA recipients differed in various baseline characteristics. Simultaneous heart kidney transplant recipients with eGFR <45 mL/minute had greater short- and long-term overall survival and cardiac allograft survival compared with HTA, as well as greater long-term freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant. These results were consistent with both propensity matched analyses and multivariable Cox regression analysis of 10 year outcomes. Optimal cutoff value for pretransplant eGFR in predicting elevated risk of renal failure in recipients of heart transplant alone was found to be eGFR ∼45 mL/minute.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to patients with eGFR <30 mL/minute, patients with eGFR 30 to 44 mL/minute who underwent simultaneous heart kidney transplant had superior outcomes compared with HTA, suggesting possible benefit of combined transplant strategy for this subset of heart transplant candidates.

Dual organ transplantation: when heart alone is not enough

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of dual organ transplantations (DOT) are steadily increasing over the past few years. This is both a reflection of increasing complexity and advanced disease process in the patients and greater transplant center experience with performing dual organ transplants. Due to lack of standardization of the process, there remains significant center-based variability in patient selection, perioperative and long-term management of these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall posttransplant outcomes for DOT have been acceptable with some immunological advantages because of partial tolerance offered by the second organ. These achievements should, however, be balanced with the ethical implications of bypassing the patients who are listed for single organ transplantation because of the preferential allocation of organs for DOT.

SUMMARY

The field of DOT is expanding rapidly, with good long-term outcomes. There is an urgent need for guidelines to standardize the process of patient selection and listing dual organ transplantation.

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation With or Without Prior Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

Both combined heart-kidney transplantation and ventricular assist devices (VADs) pose significant challenges, including sensitization, immunosuppressive treatment, and infrastructure demands. Despite these challenges, we hypothesized that the recipients of combined heart-kidney transplants with and without VADs would have equivalent survival. We aimed to compare the survival of heart-kidney transplant recipients with and without prior VAD placement.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients enrolled in the United Network for Organ Sharing database who underwent heart-kidney transplants. We created a matched cohort of patients undergoing heart-kidney transplantation with or without prior VAD using 1:1 nearest propensity-score matching with preoperative variables.

RESULTS

In the propensity-matched cohort, 399 patients underwent heart-kidney transplantation with prior VAD, and 399 underwent heart-kidney transplantation without prior VAD. The estimated survival of heart--kidney recipients with prior VAD was 84.8% at one year, 81.2% at 3 years, and 75.3% at 5 years. The estimated survival of heart-kidney recipients without prior VAD was 86.8.7% at one year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 78.8% at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of heart-kidney transplant recipients with or without prior VAD at one year (P = .42; Figure 2), 3 years (P = .34), or 5 years (P = .30).

CONCLUSION

Despite the increased challenge of heart-kidney transplantation in recipients with prior VAD, we demonstrated that these patients have similar survival to those who underwent heart-kidney transplantation without previous VAD placement.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Clinical Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart/Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Pre- and Post-heart Allocation Policy Change Eras

BACKGROUND

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices (intra-aortic balloon pump; Impella 2.5, CP, 5.0; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) increased significantly across the United States for heart transplant candidates after the allocation policy change. Whether this practice change also affected simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) candidates and recipient survival is understudied.

METHODS

We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database to identify adult SHK recipients between January 2010 and March 2022. The population was stratified into pre- and post-heart allocation change cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare 1-y survival rates. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the effect of allocation period on patient survival. Recipient outcomes bridged with eligible tMCS devices were compared in the post-heart allocation era. In a separate analysis, SHK waitlist mortality was evaluated between the allocation eras.

RESULTS

A total of 1548 SHK recipients were identified, and 1102 were included in the final cohort (534 pre-allocation and 568 post-allocation change). tMCS utilization increased from 17.9% to 51.6% after the allocation change, with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use rising most significantly. However, 1-y post-SHK survival remained unchanged in the full cohort (log-rank P  = 0.154) and those supported with any of the eligible tMCS devices. In a separate analysis (using a larger cohort of all SHK listings), SHK waitlist mortality at 1 y was significantly lower in the current allocation era ( P  = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the remarkable increase in tMCS use in SHK candidates after the heart allocation change, 1 y posttransplant survival remained unchanged. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.

Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients

Objectives

The upper limit of recipient age for combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcomes of HKT in patients aged ≥65 years.

Methods

The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify patients undergoing HKT from 2005 to 2021. Patients were stratified by age at transplantation: <65 and ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 5-year mortality, postoperative new-onset dialysis, postoperative stroke, acute rejection prior to discharge, and rejection within one-year of HKT. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk adjustment for mortality was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

HKT in recipients aged ≥65 significantly increased from 5.6% of all recipients in 2005 to 23.7% in 2021 (p=0.002). Of 2,022 HKT patients in the study period, 372 (18.40%) were aged ≥65. Older recipients were more likely to be male and white, and fewer required dialysis prior to HKT. There were no differences between cohorts in unadjusted 90-day, 1-year, or 5-year survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis. These findings persisted after risk-adjustment, with an adjusted hazard for one-year mortality for age ≥65 of 0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), p=0.572). As a continuous variable, increasing age was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), p=0.236) per year). Patients aged ≥65 more frequently required new-onset dialysis prior to discharge (11.56% vs. 7.82%, p=0.051). Stroke and rejection rates were comparable.

Conclusion

Combined HKT is increasing in older recipients, and advanced age ≥65 should not preclude HKT.

Recent Developments in the Evaluation and Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic entity associated with high morbidity and mortality among acutely ill heart failure (HF) patients with acute and/ or chronic kidney diseases (CKD). While traditionally viewed as a state of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) due to decreased renal perfusion, mainly due to therapeutic interventions to relieve congestive in HF, recent insights into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of CRS led to a broader definition and further classification of CRS into 5 distinct types. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the classification of CRS, highlighting the underlying common pathogenetic pathways of heart failure and kidney injury, including increased congestion, neurohormonal dysregulation, oxidative stress as well as inflammation, and cytokine storm that are particularly evident in COVID-19 patients with multiorgan failure and also in those with other disorders including sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus and amyloidosis. In this review we also present the recent advances in the diagnostic strategies of CRS including cardiac and renal biomarkers as well as advanced cardiac and renal imaging techniques that are available to aid in the diagnosis as well as in the prognostication of this disorder. Finally, we discuss the various therapeutic options available to-date, including fluid optimization, hemofiltration, renal replacement therapy as well as the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in light of recent data from RCTs. It is important to note that, CRS population are either excluded or underrepresented, at best, in major RCTs and therefore, therapeutic recommendations are largely extrapolated from HF and CKD clinical trials.

Change in First-year Intravascular Ultrasound Results Predicts Adverse Events in Heart Transplant Recipients: Implications for Clinical Trial Endpoints

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation (HTx) is an established therapeutic option for patients with advanced heart failure who are refractory to conventional guideline-directed treatments. This study aimed to reassess whether intravascular ultrasound variables could predict adverse events after HTx in the modern era.

METHODS

One hundred primary HTx recipients with available serial intravascular ultrasound examination results of the left anterior descending artery 4-8 wk and 1 y after HTx were enrolled, with an average follow-up duration of 5.7 y. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, and angiographic cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients developed primary endpoints. The baseline maximal intimal thickness was independently associated with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 8.24; 95% confidential interval [CI], 3.21-21.21; P  < 0.001), and the optimal cutoff value was 0.64 mm. A change in the plaque atheroma volume in a proximal 20-mm segment from the left anterior descending artery bifurcation >1.05 mm 3 /mm (hazard ratio, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.28-5.89; P  = 0.009) and a change in the first-year maximal intimal thickness >0.27 mm (hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.05-6.56; P  = 0.04) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint 1 y after intravascular ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

The aforementioned important clinical implications of intravascular ultrasound parameters are useful predictors of outcomes, which may be considered endpoints in modern clinical HTx trials.

Managing Heart Failure in Patients on Dialysis: State-of-the-Art Review

Heart failure (HF) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) frequently coexist; 1 comorbidity worsens the prognosis of the other. HF is responsible for almost half the deaths of patients on dialysis. Despite patients' with ESKD composing an extremely high-risk population, they have been largely excluded from landmark clinical trials of HF, and there is, thus, a paucity of data regarding the management of HF in patients on dialysis, and most of the available evidence is observational. Likewise, in clinical practice, guideline-directed medical therapy for HF is often down-titrated or discontinued in patients with ESKD who are undergoing dialysis; this is due to concerns about safety and tolerability. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the available evidence for each of the foundational HF therapies in ESKD, review current challenges and barriers to managing patients with HF on dialysis, and outline future directions to optimize the management of HF in these high-risk patients.

Temporary Left Ventricular Support Device as a Bridge to Heart-Liver or Heart-Kidney Transplant: Pushing the Boundaries of Temporary Support

In patients with severe cardiogenic shock, temporary mechanical circulatory support has become a viable strategy to bridge patients to heart transplantation. However, end-stage heart failure is often associated with progressive organ dysfunction of the liver or kidney. This can require a dual organ transplant for definitive management (combined heart-liver [HL] or heart-kidney [HK] transplantation). We evaluated temporary mechanical support to bridge patients to HL or HK transplant at a single, high-volume center. All patients who underwent Impella 5.0 placement from January 2014 to October 2018 were identified. From this dataset, patients who underwent placement as a bridge to dual organ transplant were selected, as were those who underwent Impella as a bridge to isolated heart transplant. Over the 5 years of evaluation, 104 patients underwent Impella 5.0 placement. Of these, 14.3% (n = 15) were identified as potential dual organ recipients (11 HK, 4 HL). In total, 80% (12/15) successfully underwent dual organ transplant (8 HK, 4 HL), with a 1-year survival of 100% in both transplanted groups. Among patients undergoing Impella 5.0 placement as a bridge to isolated heart transplant (n = 33), 78.8% (26) were successfully bridged, and 1-year survival was 92% after transplantation. Impella 5.0 is a viable bridge to dual organ transplantation and should be considered as a management strategy in these complex patients at experienced institutions.

Overcoming challenges in patient selection and monitoring in combined heart and kidney transplantation

Combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) is a growing therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although patients with advanced HF and need for chronic haemodialysis have a clear indication for combined HKT, challenges to current practice lie in identifying those patients with severely depressed kidney function, which will not recover kidney function after restoration of appropriate haemodynamic conditions following heart transplantation (HT) alone. Because of the paucity of available organs, maximisation of kidney graft utility whilst minimising the operative risks associated with combined transplantation is mandatory. The benefits of HKT go beyond the mere restoration of kidney function. Data from registry analysis show that HKT improves overall survival in patients with CKD, as compared to heart transplant only, and it is associated with reduced incidence of heart allograft rejection, likely through the promotion of host immune tolerance mechanisms. In patients not requiring chronic dialysis, kidney-after-heart strategy may be explored, instead of combined HKT, in particular when the aetiology of CKD is unclear. This indeed allows for monitoring and gaging of indications for combined transplantation in the postoperative period. This approach however should be matched with priority listing for kidney transplantation given the high waitlist mortality in heart transplant recipients with associated CKD. The use of kidney machine perfusion may represent an additional tool to optimise the outcome of HKT, allowing more time to stabilise the patient after HT surgery.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Initial Clinical Experience

Introduction

Combined solid organ transplantation is infrequently performed in Brazil. The objective of this article is to present our initial experience with combined heart and kidney transplantation.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2019, four patients were submitted to combined heart and kidney transplantation. Their mean age was 55.7±4.4 years, and three (75%) patients were males. All patients had Chagas cardiomyopathy, two were hospitalized and inotrope dependent, and all patients were on preoperative dialysis (median of 12 months prior to transplant).

Results

All patients survived and were in New York Heart Association functional class I at the latest follow-up (mean 34.7±17.5 months). Mean retarded kidney graft function was 22.9±9.7 days. One patient lost the kidney graft two years after the transplant due to Polyomavirus infection.

Conclusion

Our initial experience of combined heart and kidney transplantation was favorable in selected patients with advanced heart failure and end-stage kidney disease. It requires involvement of a dedicated multispecialty team throughout all the diagnostics and treatment steps.

Kidney Re-Transplantation after Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplant: Case Study and Literature Review

The kidney is one of most frequent transplants to be performed in multi-organ transplantation. A simultaneous heart and kidney transplant (SHKT) is the best-known treatment method in patients with severe heart failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Here, the authors describe the case of a kidney re-transplantation after SHKT, which is in accordance with the majority of studies, and proves the safety of simultaneous procedures. The article highlights the complex care required after the transplant, followed by the multi-factor qualification for re-transplantation. In conclusion, the case shows that SHKT provides long-term favorable outcomes and enables a repeated kidney transplantation with satisfactory one-year follow-up results.

Donor selection for multiorgan transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is limited data and guidance on donor selection for multiorgan transplantation. In this article, we review the current Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policy on multiorgan allocation and the ideal donor criteria for each specific organ, in order to provide a framework to guide donor selection for various scenarios of multiorgan transplantation, including heart-kidney, heart-lung, heart-liver and heart-kidney-liver transplant procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combined heart-kidney transplantation is the most common multiorgan transplant procedure and requires the most stringent HLA matching to ensure optimal graft survival. Using the virtual crossmatch and desensitization therapies can shorten waitlist times without increasing posttransplant rejection or mortality rates. The ideal heart-lung donor tends to be younger than other multiorgan transplants, and more tolerant to HLA mismatch, but ideally requires donors with no prior history of smoking, a short period of time on mechanical ventilation, adequate oxygenation and absence of pulmonary infection. The ideal heart-liver donor is often driven by criteria specific to the donor heart. Finally, several observational studies suggest that livers are more tolerant to HLA mismatch than other organs, and offer some degree of immune protection in combined organ transplants.

SUMMARY

Multiorgan transplantation is a steadily growing field. The required short ischemic time for the donor heart is often the limiting factor, as well as the scarcity of appropriate donors available within geographical confines. In general, as with single organ transplantation, younger age, size matching, few medical comorbidities and HLA compatibility confer the best posttransplant outcomes.

Combined heart-liver-kidney transplant: The university of chicago medicine experience

Until recently, combined heart-liver-kidney transplantation was considered too complex or too high-risk an option for patients with end-stage heart failure who present with advanced liver and kidney failure as well. The objective of this paper is to present our institution's best practices for successfully executing this highly challenging operation. At our institution, referral patterns are most often initiated through the cardiac team. Determinants of successful outcomes include diligent multidisciplinary patient selection, detailed perioperative planning, and choreographed care transition and coordination among all transplant teams. The surgery proceeds in three distinct phases with three different teams, linked seamlessly in planned handoffs. The selection and perioperative care are executed with determined collaboration of all of the invested care teams. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Risk factors and outcomes for delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous heart and kidney transplant recipients: A UNOS/OPTN database analysis

There are no prior studies assessing the risk factors and outcomes for kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) in simultaneous heart and kidney (SHK) transplant recipients. Using the OPTN/UNOS database, we sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of K-DGF in this unique population, as well as outcomes associated with K-DGF. A total of 1161 SHK transplanted between 1998 and 2018 were included in the analysis, of which 311 (27%) were in the K-DGF (+) group and 850 in the K-DGF (-) group. In the multivariable analysis, history of pretransplant dialysis (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 2.94 to 5.29; p < .001) was significantly associated with the development of K-DGF, as was donor death from cerebrovascular accident and longer cold ischemia time of either organ. SHK recipients with K-DGF had increased mortality (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.60; p < .001) and death censored kidney graft failure (HR: 3.51; 95% CI: 2.29 to 5.36; p < .001) in the multivariable analysis. Similar outcomes were obtained when limiting our study to 2008-2018. Similar to kidney-only recipients, K-DGF in SHK recipients is associated with worse outcomes. Careful matching of recipients and donors, as well as peri-operative management, may help reduce the risk of K-DGF and the associated detrimental effects.

Outcomes of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Heart transplantation in the setting of renal insufficiency is controversial. The objective of this study was to perform a descriptive analysis of patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) due to acute kidney injury (AKI).

DESIGN

An observational cohort study with retrospective data collection.

SETTING

A tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-one patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation with cardiogenic shock under inotrope dependence, with nine patients having preoperative RRT and 42 patients not having preoperative RRT.

INTERVENTIONS

There were no interventions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hospital mortality occurred in eight (15.6%) patients. Although there were no significant differences between the study groups (preoperative RRT 33.3% v controls 11.9%, p = 0.1), this study was underpowered to detect differences in mortality. Dialysis also was required in 52.4% of patients who were not on preoperative RRT. All survivors had full recovery of kidney function with similar timing after transplant (18.5 days v 15 days, p = 0.75). Actuarial survival was 82.4%, 76.5%, and 66.5% at six months, one year, and five years, respectively. A cold ischemic time greater than 180 minutes (hazard ratio [HR] 4.37 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-12.6; p = 0.006) and pretransplant RRT (HR = 7.19 95% CI 1.13-45.7; p = 0.04) were independent predictors of long-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In a health system with limited funding and availability of mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation in the setting of AKI, RRT, and low Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile was associated with important hospital mortality. Among hospital survivors, however, all patients had full renal recovery and by 25 months there was no difference in mortality between those who required preoperative RRT and those who did not.

Consensus conference on heart-kidney transplantation

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (sHK) has enabled the successful transplantation of patients with end-stage heart disease and concomitant kidney disease, with non-inferior outcomes to heart transplant (HT) alone. The decision for sHK is challenged by difficulties in differentiating those patients with a significant component of reversible kidney injury due to cardiorenal syndrome who may recover kidney function after HT, from those with intrinsic advanced kidney disease who would benefit most from sHK. A consensus conference on sHK took place on June 1, 2019 in Boston, Massachusetts. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in cardiothoracic and kidney transplantation from centers across the United States to explore the development of guidelines for the interdisciplinary criteria for kidney transplantation in the sHK candidate, to evaluate the current allocation of kidneys to follow the heart for sHK, and to recommend standardized care for the management of sHK recipients. The conference served as a forum to unify criteria between the different specialties and to forge a pathway for patients who may need dual organ transplantation. Due to the continuing shortage of available donor organs, ethical problems related to multi-organ transplantation were also debated. The findings and consensus statements are presented.

Impact of preoperative renal replacement therapy on the clinical outcome of heart transplant patients

Renal dysfunction is considered as a relative contraindication for heart transplantation (HTx). However, in the real world setting, many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) experience worsening of renal function and some even require renal replacement therapy (RRT) by the time they undergo HTx. We aimed to investigate the prognosis and clinical outcomes of HTx patients who required RRT during the perioperative period. The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) is a nationwide organ transplant registry in Korea. A total of 501 HTx patients had been prospectively enrolled in the KOTRY registry during 2014–2018. Among the 501 patients, 13 underwent combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx). The 488 patients who underwent isolated HTx were grouped according to their pre- and postoperative RRT status. The primary outcome was progression to dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after HTx. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality after HTx. The median follow-up was 22 months (9–39 months). Patients who needed preoperative RRT but were free from postoperative RRT showed comparable overall survival and renal outcome to patients who were free from both pre- and postoperative RRT. In multivariable analysis, preoperative RRT was not associated with progression to ESRD or all-cause mortality after HTx; however, postoperative RRT was a significant predictor for both progression to ESRD and all-cause mortality after HTx. Preoperative creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were not predictive of progression to ESRD after HTx. The present analysis suggests that preoperative RRT requirement does not indicate irreversible renal dysfunction in patients waiting for HTx. However, postoperative RRT was associated with progression to ESRD and mortality after HTx.

Immunosuppression considerations in simultaneous organ transplant

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients in the end stage of heart, lung, kidney, and liver failure. For patients with more than one failing organ, simultaneous organ transplantation has emerged as a viable treatment option. Immunosuppression strategies and outcomes for simultaneous organ transplant recipients have been reported, but often involve limited populations. Transplanting dual organs poses challenges in terms of balancing immunosuppression with immunologic risk and allograft damage from surgical complications. Furthermore, transplanting certain organs can impose considerations on the management of immunosuppression. For example, liver allografts may confer immunologic privilege and lower rates of rejection of other allografts. This review article evaluates immunosuppression strategies for simultaneous kidney-pancreas, liver-kidney, heart-kidney, heart-liver, heart-lung, lung-liver, and lung-kidney transplants. To date, no comprehensive review exists to address immunosuppressive strategies in simultaneous organ transplant populations. Our review summarizes the available literature and provides evidence-based recommendations regarding immunosuppression strategies in simultaneous organ transplant recipients.

Cardiorenal syndrome: Multi-organ dysfunction involving the heart, kidney and vasculature

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a multi-organ disease, encompassing heart, kidney and vascular system dysfunction. CRS is a worldwide problem, with high morbidity, mortality, and inflicts a significant burden on the health care system. The pathophysiology is complex, involving interactions between neurohormones, inflammatory processes, oxidative stress and metabolic derangements. Therapies remain inadequate, mainly comprising symptomatic care with minimal prospect of full recovery. Challenges include limiting the contradictory effects of multi-organ targeted drug prescriptions and continuous monitoring of volume overload. Novel strategies such as multi-organ transplantation and innovative dialysis modalities have been considered but lack evidence in the CRS context. The adjunct use of pharmaceuticals targeting alternative pathways showing positive results in preclinical models also warrants further validation in the clinic. In recent years, studies have identified the involvement of gut dysbiosis, uraemic toxin accumulation, sphingolipid imbalance and other unconventional contributors, which has encouraged a shift in the paradigm of CRS therapy.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Experience in 100 Consecutive Patients

Background

Combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) is performed in patients with severe heart failure and advanced renal insufficiency. We analyzed the long‐term survival after HKTx, the influence of age and dialysis status, the rates of cardiac rejection, and the influence of sensitization.

Methods and Results

From June 1992 to December 2016, we performed 100 HKTx procedures. We compared older (≥60 years, n=53) with younger (<60 years, n=47) recipients, and recipients on preoperative dialysis (n=49) and not on dialysis (n=51). We analyzed actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection, acute cellular rejection, and antibody‐mediated rejection, and survival rates by sensitized status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50%, and compared these survival rates with those from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the 2 age groups (35±12.4% and 49±17.3%, ≥60 versus <60 years; P=0.45). There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the dialysis and nondialysis groups (44±13.4% and 37±15.2%, P=0.95). Actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection (acute cellular rejection>0 or antibody‐mediated rejection>0) was 92±2.8% and 84±3.8%, acute cellular rejection (≥2R/3A) 98±1.5% and 94±2.5%, and antibody‐mediated rejection (≥1) 96±2.1% and 93±2.6% at 30 days and 1 year after HKTx. There was no difference in the 5‐year survival among recipients by sensitization status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50% (82±5.9%, 83±10.8%, and 92±8.0%; P=0.55). There was no difference in 15‐year survival after HKTx between the United Network for Organ Sharing database and our center (38±3.2% and 40±10.1%, respectively; P=0.45).

Conclusions

HKTx is safe to perform in patients 60 years and older or younger than 60 years and with or without dialysis dependence, with excellent outcomes. The degree of panel‐reactive antibody sensitization did not appear to affect survival after HKTx.

Kidney transplantation and cardiomyopathy: Concepts and controversies in clinical decision-making

Increasing comorbidities and an aging population have led to a tremendous increase in the burden of both kidney and cardiac dysfunction. Concomitant cardiomyopathy exposes the patients with kidney disease to further physiological, hemodynamic, and pathologic alterations. Kidney transplantation imposes lesser anesthetic and surgical complexities compared to another solid organ transplant. The surgical decision-making remains an unsettled issue in these conditions. The surgical choices, techniques, and sequences in kidney transplant and cardiac surgery depend on the pathophysiological perturbations and perioperative outcomes. The absence of randomized controlled trials eludes us from suggesting definite management protocol in patients with end-stage kidney disease with cardiomyopathy. Nevertheless, in this review, we extracted data from published literature to understand the pathophysiologic interactions between end-stage renal diseases with cardiomyopathy and also proposed the management algorithm in this challenging scenario. The proposed management algorithm would ensure consensus across all stakeholders involved in decision-making. Our simplistic evidence-based approach would augur future randomized trials and would further ensure refinement in our management approach after the emergence of more definitive evidence.

Preoperative Noncoronary Cardiovascular Assessment and Management of Kidney Transplant Candidates

The pretransplant risk assessment for patients with ESKD who are undergoing evaluation for kidney transplant is complex and multifaceted. When considering cardiovascular disease in particular, many factors should be considered. Given the increasing incidence of kidney transplantation and the growing body of evidence addressing ESKD-specific cardiovascular risk profiles, there is an important need for a consolidated, evidence-based model that considers the unique cardiovascular challenges that these patients face. Cardiovascular physiology is altered in these patients by abrupt shifts in volume status, altered calcium-phosphate metabolism, high-output states (in the setting of arteriovenous fistulization), and adverse geometric and electrical remodeling, to name a few. Here, we present a contemporary review by addressing cardiomyopathy/heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, valvular dysfunction, and arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death within the ESKD population.