Pooled Analysis of Bleeding, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality in Clinical Trials of Time-Constrained Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Early Discontinuation of Aspirin Among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Drug-Eluting Stent: A Meta-Analysis

Key Points

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1–3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) decreases the risk of clinically significant bleeding when compared with 12 months of DAPT in patients with CKD treated with a drug-eluting stent. There is no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular events with early aspirin discontinuation when compared with 12 months of DAPT post-PCI in patients with CKD.

Background

Conflicting evidence exists to support whether short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces bleeding complications after coronary artery drug-eluting stent (DES) insertion, compared with standard 12-month DAPT, particularly among patients with CKD who are at increased risk of bleeding.

Methods

A MEDLINE search identified randomized trials comparing up to 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus twelve months of DAPT after insertion of a DES for any indication. Trials were included if they reported ischemic or bleeding outcomes among patients with CKD. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac or cerebrovascular events, stent thrombosis (MACE), and major or minor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome and clinically significant bleeding. The relative risk (RR) was estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

Seven randomized trials were included for a total of 4996 patients with CKD (14% of the trial population). Early discontinuation of aspirin was associated with a similar incidence of the primary outcome among patients with CKD compared with 12-month DAPT (RR 0.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.73 to 1.30). The RR of MACE was also similar between the two arms (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.23). The risk of clinically significant bleeding was significantly lower with early discontinuation of aspirin (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78).

Conclusion

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a shortened course of DAPT seems to be associated with a similar risk of ischemic events and a lower risk of bleeding events after DES insertion among patients with CKD compared with 12-month DAPT.

Long-Term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure to Oral Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been considered the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; however, many individuals are unable or unwilling to take long-term OAC. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been controversial, and new trial data have recently emerged. We therefore sought to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OAC to percutaneous LAAC, focusing on individual clinical endpoints.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 through December 2021 for all RCTs comparing percutaneous LAAC to OAC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Fixed and random effects meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) were performed using the longest follow-up duration available by intention-to-treat. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

Three RCTs enrolling 1516 patients were identified. The weighted mean follow-up was 54.7 months. LAAC was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; p = 0.023), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.61; p = 0.003), and major nonprocedural bleeding (HR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LAAC and OAC for any other endpoints.

Conclusions

The available evidence from RCTs suggests LAAC therapy is associated with reduced long-term risk of death compared with OAC. This may be driven by reductions in hemorrhagic stroke and major nonprocedural bleeding. There were no significant differences in the risk of all stroke. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy: Considerations for Acute and Long-Term Secondary Prevention Post-PCI

Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), an initial course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y 12 inhibitor ( P2Y 12 -i) is recommended to minimize the risk of thrombotic complications. After the initial period of DAPT, antiplatelet monotherapy, usually consisting of aspirin, is administered for long-term secondary prevention. However, over the last few years there has been accruing evidence on P2Y 12 -i monotherapy, both in the acute (i.e., post-PCI; after a brief period of DAPT, transitioning to monotherapy before six or 12 months in patients with chronic or acute coronary syndrome, respectively) and chronic (i.e., long-term secondary prevention; after completion of six or 12 months of DAPT, in patients with chronic or acute coronary syndrome, respectively) settings. In aggregate, most studies of short DAPT with transition to P2Y 12 -i monotherapy showed a reduced risk of bleeding complications, without any significant increase in ischemic events as compared to standard DAPT. On the other hand, the evidence on long-term P2Y 12 -i monotherapy is scarce, but results from a randomized trial showed that clopidogrel monotherapy outperformed aspirin monotherapy in terms of net benefit, ischemic events and bleeding. Antiplatelet therapy is also recommended for patients undergoing PCI and with an established indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). In this scenario, a brief period of triple therapy (i.e., aspirin, P2Y 12 -i and OAC) is followed by a course of dual antithrombotic therapy (usually with P2Y 12 -i and OAC) and ultimately by lifelong OAC alone. European and American guidelines have been recently updated to provide new recommendations on antithrombotic therapy, including the endorsement of P2Y 12 -i monotherapy in different settings. However, some areas of uncertainty still remain and further randomized investigations are ongoing to fulfil current gaps in knowledge. In this review, we assess the current knowledge and evidence on P2Y 12 -i monotherapy for the early and long-term secondary prevention in patients undergoing PCI, and explore upcoming research and future directions in the field.

Comparison of Short-Term DAPT and Long-Term DAPT on the Prognosis of PCI Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the primary medication for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the best DAPT duration is still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT compared to long-term (12 months) DAPT.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science systematically for all the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the different strategies for DAPT in patients undergoing PCI within ten years prior to January 2021. Major bleeding and any bleeding were identified as the safe endpoints. All causes of death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and stroke were identified as the efficacy endpoints. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in each study were abstracted.

Results

Overall, 11 trials and 24,242 patients were included in this meta-analysis with 15-month median follow-up time. Short-term DAPT was related to reduced risks of major bleeding (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89) and any bleeding (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.79). No obvious differences in any of the other endpoints were observed. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with drug-eluting stents (DES), short-term compared with long-term DAPT was related to a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87) without significant increasing in the risks of any bleeding and ischemic endpoints. Furthermore, short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy appreciably lowered the risk of major bleeding (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96) and any bleeding (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93). There were no obvious differences concerning death between the different strategies for DAPT.

Conclusions

After PCI with DES, short-term DAPT is safer than long-term DAPT, and is not inferior in effectiveness, even in ACS patients. P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy following short-term DAPT is also related to a decreased risk of bleeding and may be an alternative anti-platelet strategy.

P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting: are all P2Y12-inhibitors equal?

INTRODUCTION

P2Y₁₂-inhibitor monotherapy following 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces (major) bleeding without an apparent increase in ischemic events and has therefore emerged as an alternative to 6-12 months of DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are important differences between the available P2Y₁₂-inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) as agents of choice for P2Y₁₂-inhibitor monotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review critically appraises the evidence for P2Y₁₂-inhibitor monotherapy after PCI using either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. Furthermore, we discuss ongoing trials and future directions for research.

EXPERT OPINION

P2Y₁₂-inhibitor monotherapy following 1-3 months of DAPT is an alternative to 6-12 months of DAPT following PCI. Ticagrelor may be considered the current preferred option due to its reliable effect on platelet reactivity and its predominant use in clinical trials. Prasugrel could serve as a useful substitute for those not tolerating ticagrelor, but more research into prasugrel monotherapy is warranted. Alternatively, clopidogrel can be used, although there are concerns of high platelet reactivity, especially when genotyping and/or platelet function testing are not used. Future research will need to address the minimal duration of DAPT before switching to P2Y₁₂-inhibitor monotherapy and what the optimal antithrombotic therapy beyond 12 months is.

Guided and unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with ACS: a meta-analysis

AIM

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) intends to balance ischemic and bleeding risks. Various DAPT de-escalation strategies, defined as switching from a full-dose potent to a reduced dose or less potent P2Y12 inhibitor, have been evaluated in several ACS-PCI trials. We aimed to compare DAPT de-escalation to standard DAPT with full dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS patients who underwent PCI.

METHODS & RESULTS

PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible randomised controlled trials. Aspirin monotherapy trials were excluded. Five randomised trials (n = 10,779 patients) that assigned DAPT de-escalation (genetically guided to clopidogrel n = 1,242; platelet function guided to clopidogrel n = 1,304; unguided to clopidogrel n = 1,672; unguided to lower dose n = 1,170) versus standard DAPT (control group n = 5,391) were included in this analysis. DAPT de-escalation was associated with a significant reduction in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 2 bleeding (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.78; I2 = 77%) as well as major adverse cardiac events, represented in most trials by the composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96; I2 = 0%). Notwithstanding the limited power, consistency was noted across various de-escalation strategies.

CONCLUSION

De-escalation of DAPT after PCI for ACS, both unguided and guided by genetic or platelet function testing, was associated with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding and ischemic events as compared to standard DAPT with potent P2Y12 inhibitors based on five open-label RCTs reviewed.

Effect of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with early aspirin discontinuation and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy

Recent clinical trials showed that short aspirin duration (1 or 3 months) in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduced the risk of bleeding and did not increase the ischemic risk compared to 12-month DAPT in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is unclear about the optimal duration of aspirin in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in a cohort of ACS patients with early aspirin interruption and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018, we included 498 ACS patients (age 70.18 ± 12.84 years, 71.3% men) with aspirin stopped for various reasons before 6 months after PCI and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. The clinical outcomes between those with aspirin treatment ≤ 1 month and > 1 month were compared in 12-month follow up after PCI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the covariates between groups. The mean duration of aspirin treatment was 7.52 ± 8.10 days vs. 98.05 ± 56.70 days in the 2 groups (p<0.001). The primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization and stroke occurred in 12.6% and 14.4% in the 2 groups (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.85-1.68). The safety outcome of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was also similar (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.40) between the 2 groups. In conclusion, patients with ≤ 1 month aspirin treatment had similar clinical outcomes to those with treatment > 1 month. Our results indicated that ≤ 1-month aspirin may be enough in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy strategy for ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Aspirin-free antiplatelet regimens after PCI: insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial and beyond

Historically, aspirin has been the primary treatment for the prevention of ischaemic events in patients with coronary artery disease. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard treatment has been 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel, followed by aspirin monotherapy; however, DAPT is undeniably associated with an increased risk of bleeding. For over a decade novel P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, which have increased specificity, potency, and efficacy have been available, prompting studies which have tested whether these newer agents can be used in aspirin-free antiplatelet regimens to augment clinical benefits in patients post-PCI. Among these studies, the GLOBAL LEADERS trial is the largest by cohort size, and so far has provided a wealth of evidence in a variety of clinical settings and patient groups. This article summarizes the state-of-the-art evidence obtained from the GLOBAL LEADERS and other trials of aspirin-free strategies.

Patient-tailored antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy has long been the standard of care in preventing coronary and cerebrovascular thrombotic events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but choosing the optimal treatment duration and composition has become a major challenge. Numerous studies have shown that certain patients benefit from either shortened or extended treatment duration. Furthermore, trials evaluating novel antithrombotic strategies, such as P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, low-dose factor Xa inhibitors on top of antiplatelet therapy, and platelet function- or genotype-guided (de-)escalation of treatment, have shown promising results. Current guidelines recommend risk stratification for tailoring treatment duration and composition. Although several risk stratification methods evaluating ischaemic and bleeding risk are available to clinicians, such as the use of risk scores, platelet function testing , and genotyping, risk stratification has not been broadly adopted in clinical practice. Multiple risk scores have been developed to determine the optimal treatment duration, but external validation studies have yielded conflicting results in terms of calibration and discrimination and there is limited evidence that their adoption improves clinical outcomes. Likewise, platelet function testing and genotyping can provide useful prognostic insights, but trials evaluating treatment strategies guided by these stratification methods have produced mixed results. This review critically appraises the currently available antithrombotic strategies and provides a viewpoint on the use of different risk stratification methods alongside clinical judgement in current clinical practice.