Asymmetric dimethylarginine and hypertension in cerebral small vessel disease

Arginine Derivatives in Cerebrovascular Diseases: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

The amino acid L-arginine serves as substrate for the nitric oxide synthase which is crucial in vascular function and disease. Derivatives of arginine, such as asymmetric (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), are regarded as markers of endothelial dysfunction and have been implicated in vascular disorders. While there is a variety of studies consolidating ADMA as biomarker of cerebrovascular risk, morbidity and mortality, SDMA is currently emerging as an interesting metabolite with distinct characteristics in ischemic stroke. In contrast to dimethylarginines, homoarginine is inversely associated with adverse events and mortality in cerebrovascular diseases and might constitute a modifiable protective risk factor. This review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence for the pathophysiological role of arginine derivatives in cerebrovascular ischemic diseases. We discuss the complex mechanisms of arginine metabolism in health and disease and its potential clinical implications in diverse aspects of ischemic stroke.

Nitric oxide (NO) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): their pathophysiological role and involvement in intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Nitric oxide (NO) has a variety of functions in physiological systems, particularly in the vasculature and the central nervous system. Currently, the imbalance of the pathway involving nitric oxide, nitric oxide synthase, and asymmetric dimethylarginine (NO-NOS-ADMA) is increasingly discussed in connection with endothelial dysfunction. Knowledge about the role of this pathway in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), which represents the most devastating stroke subtype, is increasing but still sparse. This article aims to review the current knowledge about the role and metabolism of NO and ADMA. It will also address the role of the NO-NOS-ADMA pathway in ICH and delineate some questions that should be addressed by future studies.

METHODS

A literature search regarding the data about NO, NOS, and ADMA and its role in ICH was conducted in PubMed.

RESULTS

Experimental data from cell culture and animal models indicate that, after the occurrence of ICH, neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthases (nNOS and iNOS) are both overexpressed and uncoupled through the induction of blood compound metabolites, including thrombin and inflammatory mediators. ADMA, the most potent endogenous inhibitor of NOS, is also overproduced following dysregulation of its metabolizing enzymes. Dysfunction of the NO-NOS-ADMA pathway results in cell death, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, and brain edema via different pathological mechanisms. However, the available data from clinical studies are still rare and partially contradictory.

CONCLUSION

Experimental data suggest an important role for the NO-NOS-ADMA pathway for secondary injury after ICH. Since the literature shows contradictory results, further studies are needed to address current confusion.