Essential aspects of external quality assurance for point-of-care testing

Behind the scenes of EQA - characteristics, capabilities, benefits and assets of external quality assessment (EQA)

Providers of external quality assessment (EQA) programs evaluate data or information obtained and reported by participant laboratories using their routine procedures to examine properties or measurands in samples provided for this purpose. EQA samples must offer participants an equal chance to obtain accurate results, while being designed to provide results in clinically relevant ranges. It is the responsibility of the EQA provider to meet the necessary requirements for homogeneity, stability and some other properties of the EQA items in order to offer participants a fair, reliable and technically interesting EQA experience. Thus, the samples are at the heart and in the centre of EQA and its success depends on their quality. This manuscript describes the requirements for EQA samples and the activities of EQA providers to achieve them.

Behind the scenes of EQA-characteristics, capabilities, benefits and assets of external quality assessment (EQA)

The main stakeholders in external quality assessment (EQA) programs are the participants, in whose interests these challenges are ultimately organised. EQA schemes in the medical field contribute to improving the quality of patient care by evaluating the analytical and diagnostic quality of laboratory and point-of-care tests (POCT) by independent third parties and, if necessary, pointing out erroneous measurement results and analytical or diagnostic improvement potential. Other benefits include the option of using EQA samples for other important laboratory procedures, such as the verification or validation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD-MDs), a contribution to the estimation of measurement uncertainty, a means of training and educating laboratory staff through educational EQA programmes or samples, or even for independent and documented monitoring of staff competence, such as on samples with unusual or even exceptional characteristics. Participation in an EQA scheme for beneficiaries like medical, microbiological and histo- and molecular pathology laboratories, users of POCT and self-testing systems as well as National Metrology Institutes, calibration laboratories and reference laboratories that are dedicated to specific tasks and have particular expectations of the EQA scheme are presented here.

Establishing quality assurance for COVID-19 antigen tests in the Indo Pacific Region: A multi-site implementation study

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance programs (QAPs) are used to evaluate the analytical quality of a diagnostic test and provide feedback to improve quality processes in testing. Rapid diagnostic tests were used in both laboratory and non-laboratory settings to diagnose COVID-19, although varied in reported performance. We aimed to design and implement a QAP for antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for COVID-19 in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Papua New Guinea.

METHODS

Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 material derived from cell culture of Wildtype, Delta, and Omicron isolates were used to manufacture 435 quality control (QC) panels (consisting of a single positive and negative sample) and 36 external quality assessment (EQA) panels for use across 15 sites in accordance with provided training and protocols.

RESULTS

In total, 369 QC results and 112 EQA results were submitted by electronic reporting or paper forms by two countries. 19·3 % (34/176) positive and 99·5 % (192/193) negative samples were correctly reported in the QC, and 37·5 % (30/80) positive and 97·5 % (39/40) negative samples were correctly reported in the EQA.

CONCLUSION

This QAP demonstrates the importance of operator training and the design of QAP materials, which may have contributed to the high rate of false-negative interpretations in known COVID-19 positive samples. The implementation of this project, to our knowledge the first of its kind in the region and one of only a few globally, emphasised the importance of quality assurance principles, including non-laboratory community testing sites, to promote diagnostic quality for COVID-19 testing.

Analytical performance specifications and quality assurance of point-of-care testing in primary healthcare

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is the fastest-growing segment of laboratory medicine. This review focuses on the essential aspects of setting analytical performance specifications (APS) and performing quality assurance for POCT in primary healthcare. In-vitro diagnostic medical devices for POCT are typically small and easy to operate. Users often have little to no laboratory experience and may not necessarily see the value of conducting quality assurance on their devices. Therefore, training, guidance, and motivation should be integral parts of the total quality management system, as they are vital for managing errors and ensuring reliable results. It is common to believe that the analytical quality of POCT should be comparable to that of laboratory testing, and as a result, APS should be the same. This paper challenges this concept. The APS for POCT can often be less stringent compared to those used in a central laboratory because the requester is closer to both the analytical and clinical situation. Point-of-care instruments should be selected based on clinical needs, the required analytical quality and user-friendliness in the intended usage setting.Quality assurance should include both internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA). It is recommended that IQC protocols should be dependent on the complexity of the POCT device. A scoring system to determine how frequent IQC should be analyzed in primary healthcare on different types of POCT devices has been suggested. The main challenge in EQA for POCT involves using suitable control materials that reflect instrument performance on patient samples. Obtaining commutable control materials for POCT is difficult since the matrix often is whole blood. An essential aspect of EQA for POCT is that feedback reports should be easily interpretable. Users should receive advice from the EQA organizer regarding the root causes of deviating results. Quality assurance for POCT is not an easy task and presents numerous challenges. However, there is evidence that quality assurance improves the quality of POCT measurements and, consequently, can enhance patient outcomes.

Applications of Mass Spectrometry for Clinical Diagnostics: The Influence of Turnaround Time

This critical review discusses how the need for reduced clinical turnaround times has influenced chemical instrumentation. We focus on the development of modern mass spectrometry (MS) and its application in clinical diagnosis. With increased functionality that takes advantage of novel front-end modifications and computational capabilities, MS can now be used for non-traditional clinical analyses, including applications in clinical microbiology for bacteria differentiation and in surgical operation rooms. We summarize here recent developments in the field that have enabled such capabilities, which include miniaturization for point-of-care testing, direct complex mixture analysis via ambient ionization, chemical imaging and profiling, and systems integration.

Commutability of a Whole-Blood External Quality Assessment Material for Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein, Glucose, and Hemoglobin Testing

BACKGROUND

The optimal situation in external quality assessment (EQA) is to use commutable materials. No previous study has examined the commutability of a whole-blood material for point-of-care (POC) testing. The aim of this study was to determine the commutability of the Norwegian Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus) organization's “in-house” whole-blood EQA material for C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, and hemoglobin for frequently used POC instruments in Norway and to determine the possibility of using a common target value for each analyte.

METHODS

The study was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The EQA material was pooled stabilized EDTA venous whole-blood containing different concentrations of the analytes. The EQA material and native routine patient samples were analyzed using 17 POC and 3 hospital instruments. The commutability was assessed using Deming regression analysis with 95% prediction intervals for each instrument comparison.

RESULTS

The EQA material was commutable for all CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments, whereas for glucose the material was commutable for all POC instruments at the lowest concentration analyzed [126.0 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L)] and for 3 POC instruments at all of the concentrations analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Noklus EQA participants using CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments now receive results that are compared with a reference target value, whereas the results for participants using glucose POC instruments are still compared with method-specific target values. Systematic deviations from a reference target value for the commutable glucose POC instruments can be calculated, and this additional information can now be offered to these participants and to the manufacturers.

Harmonization activities of Noklus – a quality improvement organization for point-of-care laboratory examinations

Noklus is a non-profit quality improvement organization that focuses to improve all elements in the total testing process. The aim is to ensure that all medical laboratory examinations are ordered, performed and interpreted correctly and in accordance with the patients’ needs for investigation, treatment and follow-up. For 25 years, Noklus has focused on point-of-care (POC) testing in primary healthcare laboratories and has more than 3100 voluntary participants. The Noklus quality system uses different tools to obtain harmonization and improvement: (1) external quality assessment for the pre-examination, examination and postexamination phase to monitor the harmonization process and to identify areas that need improvement and harmonization, (2) manufacturer-independent evaluations of the analytical quality and user-friendliness of POC instruments and (3) close interactions and follow-up of the participants through site visits, courses, training and guidance. Noklus also recommends which tests that should be performed in the different facilities like general practitioner offices, nursing homes, home care, etc. About 400 courses with more than 6000 delegates are organized annually. In 2017, more than 21,000 e-learning programs were completed.

The impact of digital technologies on point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings

INTRODUCTION

Simple, rapid tests that can be used at the point-of-care (POC) can improve access to diagnostic services and overall patient management in resource-limited settings where laboratory infrastructure is limited. Implementation of POC tests places tremendous strain on already fragile health systems as the demand for training, supply management and quality assurance are amplified. Digital health has a major role to play in ensuring effective delivery and management of POC testing services. Area covered: The ability to digitise laboratory and POC platforms, including lateral flow rapid diagnostic test results, can standardize the interpretation of results and allows data to be linked to proficiency testing to ensure testing quality, reducing interpretation and transcription errors. Remote monitoring of POC instrument functionality and utilization through connectivity, allows programs to optimize instrument placement, algorithm adoption and supply management. Alerts can be built into the system to raise alarm at unusual trends such as outbreaks. Expert commentary: Digital technology has had a powerful impact on POC testing in resource limited settings. Technology, markets, and medical devices have matured to enable connected diagnostics to become a useful tool for epidemiology, patient care and tracking, research, and antimicrobial resistance and outbreak surveillance. However, to unlock this potential, digital tools must first add value at the point of patient care. The global health community need to propose models for protecting intellectual property to foster innovation and for safeguarding data confidentiality.