Short-term influences of lung volume reduction surgery on the diaphragm in emphysematous hamsters

Respiratory muscle plasticity

Muscle plasticity is defined as the ability of a given muscle to alter its structural and functional properties in accordance with the environmental conditions imposed on it. As such, respiratory muscle is in a constant state of remodeling, and the basis of muscle's plasticity is its ability to change protein expression and resultant protein balance in response to varying environmental conditions. Here, we will describe the changes of respiratory muscle imposed by extrinsic changes in mechanical load, activity, and innervation. Although there is a large body of literature on the structural and functional plasticity of respiratory muscles, we are only beginning to understand the molecular-scale protein changes that contribute to protein balance. We will give an overview of key mechanisms regulating protein synthesis and protein degradation, as well as the complex interactions between them. We suggest future application of a systems biology approach that would develop a mathematical model of protein balance and greatly improve treatments in a variety of clinical settings related to maintaining both muscle mass and optimal contractile function of respiratory muscles.

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery

Since the publication of the last edition of the Handbook of Physiology, lung transplantation has become widely available, via specialized centers, for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Lung volume reduction surgery, a procedure for emphysema first conceptualized in the 1950s, electrified the pulmonary medicine community when it was rediscovered in the 1990s. In parallel with their technical and clinical refinement, extensive investigation has explored the unique physiology of these procedures. In the case of lung transplantation, relevant issues include the discrepant mechanical function of the donor lungs and recipient thorax, the effects of surgical denervation, acute and chronic rejection, respiratory, chest wall, and limb muscle function, and response to exercise. For lung volume reduction surgery, there have been new insights into the counterintuitive observation that lung function in severe emphysema can be improved by resecting the most diseased portions of the lungs. For both procedures, insights from physiology have fed back to clinicians to refine patient selection and to scientists to design clinical trials. This section will first provide an overview of the clinical aspects of these procedures, including patient selection, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes. It then reviews the extensive data on lung and muscle function following transplantation and its complications. Finally, it reviews the insights from the last 15 years on the mechanisms whereby removal of lung from an emphysema patient can improve the function of the lung left behind.

Effect of lung transplant and volume reduction surgery on respiratory muscle function

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery have opened a new therapeutic era for patients with advanced emphysema. In addition to providing impressive clinical benefits, they have helped us better understand how the chest wall and respiratory muscles adapt to chronic hyperinflation. This article reviews the effects of these procedures on respiratory muscle and chest wall function. Inspiratory (including diaphragm) and expiratory muscle strength are often close to normal after unilateral and bilateral transplantation, although some patients have marked weakness. After bilateral transplantation for emphysema, graft volume is normal at full inflation but remains greater than normal at end expiration, which results from structural changes in the chest wall. In contrast, patients with unilateral transplantation have a reduction in graft volume at full inflation. The mediastinum is displaced toward the graft at end expiration, which reduces the surface area of the diaphragm on the transplanted side, and it moves toward the native lung during tidal and full inspiration and toward the graft during tidal and forced expiration. Lung volume reduction produces an increase in contractility, length and surface area of the diaphragm, and increases its contribution to tidal volume; at the same time, neural drive to the muscle and respiratory load are reduced, such that diaphragm neuromechanical coupling is improved. Diaphragm configuration and rib cage dimensions are only minimally affected by the procedure. Single-lung transplantation and lung volume reduction favorably impact on the disadvantageous size interaction by which the lungs are functionally restricted by the chest wall in emphysema.

Respiratory muscle fiber remodeling in chronic hyperinflation: dysfunction or adaptation?

The diaphragm and other respiratory muscles undergo extensive remodeling in both animal models of emphysema and in human chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but the nature of the remodeling is different in many respects. One common feature is a shift toward improved endurance characteristics and increased oxidative capacity. Furthermore, both animals and humans respond to chronic hyperinflation by diaphragm shortening. Although in rodent models this clearly arises by deletion of sarcomeres in series, the mechanism has not been proven conclusively in human chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Unique characteristics of the adaptation in human diaphragms include shifts to more predominant slow, type I fibers, expressing slower myosin heavy chain isoforms, and type I and type II fiber atrophy. Although some laboratories report reductions in specific force, this may be accounted for by decreases in myosin heavy chain content as the muscles become more oxidative and more efficient. More recent findings have reported reductions in Ca(2+) sensitivity and reduced myofibrillar elastic recoil. In contrast, in rodent models of disease, there is no consistent evidence for loss of specific force, no consistent shift in fiber populations, and atrophy is predominantly seen only in fast, type IIX fibers. This review challenges the hypothesis that the adaptations in human diaphragm represent a form of dysfunction, secondary to systemic disease, and suggest that most findings can as well be attributed to adaptive processes of a complex muscle responding to unique alterations in its working environment.

Physiologic basis for improved pulmonary function after lung volume reduction

It is not readily apparent how pulmonary function could be improved by resecting portions of the lung in patients with emphysema. In emphysema, elevation in residual volume relative to total lung capacity reduces forced expiratory volumes, increases inspiratory effort, and impairs inspiratory muscle mechanics. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) better matches the size of the lungs to the size of the thorax containing them. This restores forced expiratory volumes and the mechanical advantage of the inspiratory muscles. In patients with heterogeneous emphysema, LVRS may also allow space occupied by cysts to be reclaimed by more normal lung. Newer, bronchoscopic methods for lung volume reduction seek to achieve similar ends by causing localized atelectasis, but may be hindered by the low collateral resistance of emphysematous lung. Understanding of the mechanisms of improved function after LVRS can help select patients more likely to benefit from this approach.

Lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been widely studied and has been available for the treatment of advanced emphysema for 10 years. This paper reviews some of the historical attempts at surgical treatment of emphysema, the physiology of LVRS, and the modern data on patient selection, risks, and benefits. Data from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial are presented in the context of the large body of case series and smaller randomized trials that have preceded that study. Future technologies of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction are also discussed.

Volume Reduction Surgery Impairs Immediate Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Canine Emphysema

RATIONALE

In severe pulmonary emphysema, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves pulmonary function over a 2-yr period in selected patients. However, the changes in lung function and maximal flow (Vmax) occurring immediately postoperatively are not clear and may contribute to the high morbidity observed. In the present study, we used a chronic canine model of upper lobe emphysema to address this question.

METHODS

Bilateral upper lobe emphysema was produced by the intrabronchial administration of papain. Measurements were made before and immediately after LVRS was performed. A vacuum-assisted surgical system (VALR Surgical System; Spiration, Redmond, WA) that deploys a compression sleeve over portions of the disease tissue was used to produce LVRS. Changes in Vmax were interpreted in terms of the wave-speed theory of flow limitation in which a pressure sensor was placed into the airway to determine the site of limitation and intrabronchial pressures.

RESULTS

In the emphysema group, total lung capacity postemphysema increased to approximately 20% above the preemphysema value, whereas Vmax was reduced as compared with a control group. After LVRS, tidal respiratory compliance and Vmax decreased, whereas lung elastic recoil and frictional resistance increased in both the emphysema and control groups as compared with presurgery.

CONCLUSION

The acute effect of LVRS leads to an impairment in lung mechanical properties. These changes could contribute to ventilatory complications, including the difficulty of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation and the mortality observed from this procedure.