The pros and cons of airway lining fluid composition analysis

Development of a multi-matrix LC-MS/MS method for urea quantitation and its application in human respiratory disease studies

In human respiratory disease studies, liquid samples such as nasal secretion (NS), lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF), or upper airway mucosal lining fluid (MLF) are frequently collected, but their volumes often remain unknown. The lack of volume information makes it hard to estimate the actual concentration of recovered active pharmaceutical ingredient or biomarkers. Urea has been proposed to serve as a sample volume marker because it can freely diffuse through most body compartments and is less affected by disease states. Here, we report an easy and reliable LC-MS/MS method for cross-matrix measurement of urea in serum, plasma, universal transfer medium (UTM), synthetic absorptive matrix elution buffer 1 (SAMe1) and synthetic absorptive matrix elution buffer 2 (SAMe2) which are commonly sampled in human respiratory disease studies. The method uses two stable-isotope-labeled urea isotopologues, [¹⁵N₂]-urea and [¹³C,¹⁵N₂]-urea, as the surrogate analyte and the internal standard, respectively. This approach provides the best measurement consistency across different matrices. The analyte extraction was individually optimized in each matrix. Specifically in UTM, SAMe1 and SAMe2, the unique salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) not only dramatically reduces the matrix interferences but also improves the assay recovery. The use of an HILIC column largely increases the analyte retention. The typical run time is 3.6min which allows for high throughput analysis.

Inflammatory Mediator Profiling of n-butanol Exposed Upper Airways in Individuals with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a chronic condition characterized by reports of recurrent symptoms in response to low level exposure to various chemical substances. Recent findings suggests that dysregulation of the immune system may play a role in MCS pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine baseline and low dose n-butanol-induced upper airway inflammatory response profiles in MCS subjects versus healthy controls.

METHOD

Eighteen participants with MCS and 18 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Epithelial lining fluid was collected from the nasal cavity at three time points: baseline, within 15 minutes after being exposed to 3.7 ppm n-butanol in an exposure chamber and four hours after exposure termination. A total of 19 cytokines and chemokines were quantified. Furthermore, at baseline and during the exposure session, participants rated the perceived intensity, valence and levels of symptoms and autonomic recordings were obtained.

RESULTS

The physiological and psychophysical measurements during the n-butanol exposure session verified a specific response in MCS individuals only. However, MCS subjects and healthy controls displayed similar upper airway inflammatory mediator profiles (P>0.05) at baseline. Likewise, direct comparison of mediator levels in the MCS group and controls after n-butanol exposure revealed no significant group differences.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate no abnormal upper airway inflammatory mediator levels in MCS subjects before or after a symptom-eliciting exposure to low dose n-butanol, implying that upper airways of MCS subjects are functionally intact at the level of cytokine and chemokine production and secretory capacity. This suggests that previous findings of increased cytokine plasma levels in MCS are unlikely to be caused by systemic priming via excessive upper airway inflammatory processes.