Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Long-Term Follow-up after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights for Managing Medical Complexity after Critical Illness

Time to Talk Money? Intensive Care Unit Clinicians' Perspectives on Addressing Patients' Financial Hardship

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients and their families commonly experience financial hardship, yet this experience is inadequately addressed by clinicians providing care in the intensive care unit. Understanding clinicians' perspectives on the barriers to addressing financial hardship provides an opportunity to identify and mitigate those barriers and improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize intensive care unit clinicians' experiences with and perceived barriers to addressing financial hardship with their patients.

METHODS

The study entailed a thematic analysis of semistructured interviews of 17 physicians, nurses, and social workers providing care to critically ill patients in a large academic health care system in the US Pacific Northwest.

RESULTS

Participants recognized the importance of addressing financial hardship as an integral part of patient-centered care but identified barriers influencing their comfort with and capacity to address financial hardship. Barriers fit into 2 themes: "(dis)comfort addressing financial hardship" and "values-based concerns." (Dis)comfort addressing financial hardship was influenced by systems- and practice-based barriers. Participants discussed concerns about real and perceived conflicts of interest when patient, family, clinician, and institutional priorities were not aligned.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants recognized financial hardship as an important consequence of critical illness that negatively affected patient and family outcomes, yet they described barriers to adequately addressing this topic. Normalizing discussions about the financial impacts of critical illness and systematically screening for financial hardship may be a first step in mitigating these barriers.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

The understanding of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has evolved greatly since it was first described in a 1967 case series, with several subsequent updates to the definition of the syndrome. Basic science advances and clinical trials have provided insight into the mechanisms of lung injury in ARDS and led to reduced mortality through comprehensive critical care interventions. This review summarizes the current understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of ARDS. Key highlights include a recommended new global definition of ARDS and updated guidelines for managing ARDS on a backbone of established interventions such as low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, and a conservative fluid strategy. Future priorities for investigation of ARDS are also highlighted.

Do critical illness survivors with multimorbidity need a different model of care?

There is currently a lack of evidence on the optimal strategy to support patient recovery after critical illness. Previous research has largely focussed on rehabilitation interventions which aimed to address physical, psychological, and cognitive functional sequelae, the majority of which have failed to demonstrate benefit for the selected outcomes in clinical trials. It is increasingly recognised that a person's existing health status, and in particular multimorbidity (usually defined as two or more medical conditions) and frailty, are strongly associated with their long-term outcomes after critical illness. Recent evidence indicates the existence of a distinct subgroup of critical illness survivors with multimorbidity and high healthcare utilisation, whose prior health trajectory is a better predictor of long-term outcomes than the severity of their acute illness. This review examines the complex relationships between multimorbidity and patient outcomes after critical illness, which are likely mediated by a range of factors including the number, severity, and modifiability of a person's medical conditions, as well as related factors including treatment burden, functional status, healthcare delivery, and social support. We explore potential strategies to optimise patient recovery after critical illness in the presence of multimorbidity. A comprehensive and individualized approach is likely necessary including close coordination among healthcare providers, medication reconciliation and management, and addressing the physical, psychological, and social aspects of recovery. Providing patient-centred care that proactively identifies critical illness survivors with multimorbidity and accounts for their unique challenges and needs is likely crucial to facilitate recovery and improve outcomes.

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: understanding and addressing the burden of multisystem manifestations

Individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection can develop symptoms that persist well beyond the acute phase of COVID-19 or emerge after the acute phase, lasting for weeks or months after the initial acute illness. The post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, which include physical, cognitive, and mental health impairments, are known collectively as long COVID or post-COVID-19 condition. The substantial burden of this multisystem condition is felt at individual, health-care system, and socioeconomic levels, on an unprecedented scale. Survivors of COVID-19-related critical illness are at risk of the well known sequelae of acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and chronic critical illness, and these multidimensional morbidities might be difficult to differentiate from the specific effects of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. We provide an overview of the manifestations of post-COVID-19 condition after critical illness in adults. We explore the effects on various organ systems, describe potential pathophysiological mechanisms, and consider the challenges of providing clinical care and support for survivors of critical illness with multisystem manifestations. Research is needed to reduce the incidence of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19-related critical illness and to optimise therapeutic and rehabilitative care and support for patients.

Long-term physical impairments in survivors of COVID-19-associated ARDS compared with classic ARDS: A two-center study

PURPOSE

This work aimed to compare physical impairment in survivors of classic ARDS compared with COVID-19-associated ARDS (CARDS) survivors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective observational cohort study on 248 patients with CARDS and compared them with a historical cohort of 48 patients with classic ARDS. Physical performance was evaluated at 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge, using the Medical Research Council Scale (MRCss), 6-min walk test (6MWT), handgrip dynamometry (HGD), and fatigue severity score (FSS). We also assessed activities of daily living (ADLs) using the Barthel index.

RESULTS

At 6 months, patients with classic ARDS had lower HGD (estimated difference [ED]: 11.71 kg, p < 0.001; ED 31.9% of predicted value, p < 0.001), 6MWT distance (ED: 89.11 m, p < 0.001; ED 12.96% of predicted value, p = 0.032), and more frequent significant fatigue (OR 0.35, p = 0.046). At 12 months, patients with classic ARDS had lower HGD (ED: 9.08 kg, p = 0.0014; ED 25.9% of predicted value, p < 0.001) and no difference in terms of 6MWT and fatigue. At 12 months, patients with classic ARDS improved their MRCss (ED 2.50, p = 0.006) and HGD (ED: 4.13 kg, p = 0.002; ED 9.45% of predicted value, p = 0.005), while those with CARDS did not. Most patients in both groups regained independence in ADLs at 6 months. COVID-19 diagnosis was a significant independent predictor of better HGD (p < 0.0001) and 6MWT performance (p = 0.001), and lower prevalence of fatigue (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Both classic ARDS and CARDS survivors experienced long-term impairments in physical functioning, confirming that post-intensive care syndrome remains a major legacy of critical illness. Surprisingly, however, persisting disability was more common in survivors of classic ARDS than in CARDS survivors. In fact, muscle strength measured with HGD was reduced in survivors of classic ARDS compared to CARDS patients at both 6 and 12 months. The 6MWT was reduced and fatigue was more common in classic ARDS compared to CARDS at 6 months but differences were no longer significant at 12 months. Most patients in both groups regained independent function in ADLs at 6 months.

Challenging the logic of lifesaving in the intensive care unit

Intensive care units are considered life-saving medical services and a vital component of healthcare systems. These specialized hospital wards contain the life support machines and technical expertise to sustain seriously ill and injured bodies. However, as the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, intensive care is an expensive, finite resource which is not necessarily available to all citizens, and which may be unjustly rationed. As a result, the intensive care unit may contribute more towards biopolitical narratives of investment in lifesaving than measurable improvements in population health. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork and a decade of involvement in clinical research, this paper examines everyday activities of lifesaving in the intensive care unit and interrogates epistemological assumptions upon which they are organized. A closer look at how healthcare professionals, medical devices, patients, and families accept, refuse, and modify imposed boundaries of bodily finitude reveals how activities of lifesaving often lead to uncertainty and may even impose harm when they deny possibilities for desired death. Refiguring death as a personal ethical threshold, rather than inherently tragic ending, challenges the power of the logic of lifesaving and instead insists on greater attention towards improving conditions for living.

Outcomes of Children Surviving Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence for the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference-2 (PALICC-2) recommendations for assessment of outcomes among patients surviving pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).

STUDY SELECTION

We conducted a scoping review to identify studies evaluating outcomes following PARDS. We included studies of survivors of PARDS, acute respiratory failure with a high proportion of PARDS patients, or other critical illnesses if PARDS-specific outcomes could be extracted.

DATA EXTRACTION

Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Of 8,037 abstracts screened, we identified 20 articles for inclusion. Morbidity following PARDS was common and affected multiple domains of pulmonary and nonpulmonary function. There was insufficient evidence to generate any evidence-based recommendations. We generated eight good practice statements and five research statements. A panel of 52 experts discussed each proposed good practice statement and research statement, and the agreement rate was measured with an online voting process. Good practice statements describe the approach to clinical outcome assessment, assessment of pulmonary outcomes of children surviving PARDS, and assessment of nonpulmonary outcomes of children surviving PARDS including health-related quality of life and physical, neurocognitive, emotional, family, and social functioning. The five research statements relate to assessment of patient preillness status, use of postdischarge endpoints for clinical trials, the association between short-term and longer term outcomes, the trajectory of recovery following PARDS, and practices to optimize follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing evidence that children are at risk for impairments across a range of pulmonary and nonpulmonary health domains following hospitalization for PARDS. The results of this extensive scoping review and consensus conference involving experts in PARDS research, clinical care, and outcomes assessment provide guidance to clinicians and researchers on postdischarge follow-up to optimize the long-term health of patients surviving PARDS.

Identifying Long-Term Morbidities and Health Trajectories After Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Children Using State All Payer Claims Data

OBJECTIVES

To identify postdischarge outcome phenotypes and risk factors for poor outcomes using insurance claims data.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single quaternary center.

PATIENTS

Children without preexisting tracheostomy who required greater than or equal to 3 days of invasive mechanical ventilation, survived the hospitalization, and had postdischarge insurance eligibility in Colorado's All Payer Claims Database.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We used unsupervised machine learning to identify functional outcome phenotypes based on claims data representative of postdischarge morbidities. We assessed health trajectory by comparing change in the number of insurance claims between quarters 1 and 4 of the postdischarge year. Regression analyses identified variables associated with unfavorable outcomes. The 381 subjects had median age 3.3 years (interquartile range, 0.9-12 yr), and 147 (39%) had a complex chronic condition. Primary diagnoses were respiratory (41%), injury (23%), and neurologic (11%). We identified three phenotypes: lower morbidity (n = 300), higher morbidity (n = 62), and 1-year nonsurvivors (n = 19). Complex chronic conditions most strongly predicted the nonsurvivor phenotype. Longer PICU stays and tracheostomy placement most strongly predicted the higher morbidity phenotype. Patients with high but improving postdischarge resource use were differentiated by high illness severity and long PICU stays. Patients with persistently high or increasing resource use were differentiated by complex chronic conditions and tracheostomy placement.

CONCLUSIONS

New morbidities are common after prolonged mechanical ventilation. Identifying phenotypes at high risk of postdischarge morbidity may facilitate prognostic enrichment in clinical trials.

Novel Claims-Based Outcome Phenotypes in Survivors of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

For children hospitalized with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), to use postdischarge insurance claims to identify: (1) healthcare utilization patterns representative of functional outcome phenotypes and (2) patient and hospitalization characteristics that predict outcome phenotype.

SETTING

Two pediatric trauma centers and a state-level insurance claim aggregator.

PATIENTS

A total of 289 children, who survived a hospitalization after TBI between 2009 and 2014, were in the hospital trauma registry, and had postdischarge insurance eligibility.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

MAIN MEASURES

Unsupervised machine learning to identify phenotypes based on postdischarge insurance claims. Regression analyses to identify predictors of phenotype.

RESULTS

Median age 5 years (interquartile range 2-12), 29% (84/289) female. TBI severity: 30% severe, 14% moderate, and 60% mild. We identified 4 functional outcome phenotypes. Phenotypes 3 and 4 were the highest utilizers of resources. Morbidity burden was highest during the first 4 postdischarge months and subsequently decreased in all domains except respiratory. Severity and mechanism of injury, intracranial pressure monitor placement, seizures, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay were phenotype predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsupervised machine learning identified postdischarge phenotypes at high risk for morbidities. Most phenotype predictors are available early in the hospitalization and can be used for prognostic enrichment of clinical trials targeting mitigation or treatment of domain-specific morbidities.

Theorising survivorship after intensive care: A systematic review of patient and family experiences

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review explores and maps what we know about survivorship to understand how survivorship can be theoretically defined.

BACKGROUND

Survivorship of critical illness has been identified as a challenge for the 21st Century. Whilst the use of the term 'survivorship' is now common in critical care, it has been borrowed from the cancer literature where the discourse on what survivorship means in a cancer context is ongoing and remains largely descriptive. In the absence of a theoretical understanding, the term 'survivorship' is often used in critical illness in a generic way, limiting our understanding of what survivorship is. The current COVID-19 pandemic adds to an urgency of understanding what intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship might mean, given the emerging long-term consequences of this patient cohort. We set out to explore how survivorship after critical illness is being conceptualised and what the implications might be for clinical practice and research.

DESIGN

Integrated systematic literature review. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PRISMA guidelines were followed and a PRISMA checklist for reporting systematic reviews completed.

RESULTS

The three main themes around which the reviewed studies were organised are: (a) healthcare system; (b) ICU survivors' families; and (c) ICU survivor's identity. These three themes feed into an overarching core theme of 'ICU Survivorship Experiences'. These themes map our current knowledge of what happens when a patient survives a critical illness and where we are in understanding ICU survivorship.

CONCLUSION

We mapped in this systematic review the different pieces of the jigsaw that emerge following critical illness to understand and see the bigger picture of what happens after patients survive critical illness. It is evident that existing research has mapped these connections, but what we have not managed to do yet is defining what survivorship is theoretically. We offer a preliminary definition of survivorship as a process but are aware that this definition needs to be developed further with patients and families.

Spontaneous Versus Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Purpose of Review

To review clinical evidence on whether or not to allow mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to breathe spontaneously.

Recent Findings

Observational data (LUNG SAFE study) indicate that mechanical ventilation allowing for spontaneous breathing (SB) is associated with more ventilator-free days and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit without any effect on hospital mortality. A paediatric trial, comparing airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and low-tidal volume ventilation, showed an increase in mortality in the APRV group. Conversely, in an unpublished trial comparing SB and controlled ventilation (NCT01862016), the authors concluded that SB is feasible but did not improve outcomes in ARDS patients.

Summary

A paucity of clinical trial data continues to prevent firm guidance on if or when to allow SB during mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. No published large randomised controlled trial exists to inform practice about the benefits and harms of either mode.

COVID-19: Rethinking the Lockdown Groupthink

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide pandemic in 2020. In response, most countries in the world implemented lockdowns, restricting their population's movements, work, education, gatherings, and general activities in attempt to "flatten the curve" of COVID-19 cases. The public health goal of lockdowns was to save the population from COVID-19 cases and deaths, and to prevent overwhelming health care systems with COVID-19 patients. In this narrative review I explain why I changed my mind about supporting lockdowns. The initial modeling predictions induced fear and crowd-effects (i.e., groupthink). Over time, important information emerged relevant to the modeling, including the lower infection fatality rate (median 0.23%), clarification of high-risk groups (specifically, those 70 years of age and older), lower herd immunity thresholds (likely 20-40% population immunity), and the difficult exit strategies. In addition, information emerged on significant collateral damage due to the response to the pandemic, adversely affecting many millions of people with poverty, food insecurity, loneliness, unemployment, school closures, and interrupted healthcare. Raw numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths were difficult to interpret, and may be tempered by information placing the number of COVID-19 deaths in proper context and perspective relative to background rates. Considering this information, a cost-benefit analysis of the response to COVID-19 finds that lockdowns are far more harmful to public health (at least 5-10 times so in terms of wellbeing years) than COVID-19 can be. Controversies and objections about the main points made are considered and addressed. Progress in the response to COVID-19 depends on considering the trade-offs discussed here that determine the wellbeing of populations. I close with some suggestions for moving forward, including focused protection of those truly at high risk, opening of schools, and building back better with a economy.

Post-discharge critical COVID-19 lung function related to severity of radiologic lung involvement at admission

Lung function impairment persists in 55% of critical COVID-19 patients three months after ICU discharge. Patient lung function, exercise capacity, radiologic, and quality of life data suggest impairment is related to radiologic lung involvement at admission.

Novel risk scoring system for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China

Background

The mortality rate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hence, risk evaluation tools are required to immediately identify high-risk patients upon admission for early intervention.

Methods

A cohort of 220 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. To analyze the risk factors of ARDS, data obtained from approximately 70% of the participants were randomly selected and used as training dataset to establish a logistic regression model. Meanwhile, data obtained from the remaining 30% of the participants were used as test dataset to validate the effect of the model.

Results

Lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, D-dimer, procalcitonin, and ferritin levels were included in the risk score system and were assigned a score of 25, 15, 34, 20, and 24, respectively. The cutoff value for the total score was > 35, with a sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 81.20%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were 0.967 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.925–0.989) and 0.437(P Value = 0.437). The model had excellent discrimination and calibration during internal validation.

Conclusions

The novel risk score may be a valuable risk evaluation tool for screening patients with COVID-19 who are at high risk of ARDS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05561-y.

Experimental lung injury induces cerebral cytokine mRNA production in pigs

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an important disease with a high incidence among patients admitted to intensive care units. Over the last decades, the survival of critically ill patients has improved; however, cognitive deficits are among the long-term sequelae. We hypothesize that acute lung injury leads to upregulation of cerebral cytokine synthesis.

Methods

After approval of the institutional and animal care committee, 20 male pigs were randomized to one of three groups: (1) Lung injury by oleic acid injection (OAI), (2) ventilation only (CTR) or (3) untreated. We compared neuronal numbers, proportion of neurons with markers for apoptosis, activation state of Iba-1 stained microglia cells and cerebral mRNA levels of different cytokines between the groups 18 hours after onset of lung injury.

Results

We found an increase in hippocampal TNFalpha (p < 0.05) and IL-6 (p < 0.05) messenger RNA (mRNA) in the OAI compared to untreated group as well as higher hippocampal IL-6 mRNA compared to control (p < 0.05). IL-8 and IL-1beta mRNA showed no differences between the groups. We found histologic markers for beginning apoptosis in OAI compared to untreated (p < 0.05) and more active microglia cells in OAI and CTR compared to untreated (p < 0.001 each).

Conclusion

Hippocampal cytokine transcription increases within 18 hours after the induction of acute lung injury with histological evidence of neuronal damage. It remains to be elucidated if increased cytokine mRNA synthesis plays a role in the cognitive decline observed in survivors of ARDS.

Neurorehabilitation in the times of Covid-19: insights from the Spanish Neurorehabilitation Society (SENR)

The entire world is experiencing an unprecedented global health crisis and Spain has been one of the most heavily affected countries within Europe. Unexpected rapid changes and reorganization of medical services that occurred during the pandemic lead to an impact in the practice of neurorehabilitation. The idiosyncrasies typical of neurorehabilitation management, specially in acute facilities, that makes it susceptible as a vector of dissemination of Covid but also because of the need of finding new wards and intensive care units for Covid patients, the interventions in neurorehabilitation has suffered enormous changes. There is a need for rethinking the future to treat a new wave of patients with neurorehabilitation necessities such as those recovering from Covid 19 with neurological sequelae but also of those neurorehab patients who were unable to access the health system during the locke down period. This article is intended to invite to reflect on and discuss the redesign of our current neurorehabilitation plans after the experience on the Covid 19 pandemic.

Canagliflozin alleviates LPS-induced acute lung injury by modulating alveolar macrophage polarization

BACKGROUND

Canagliflozin (CANA), a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is a novel therapeutic agent that exhibits multiple actions in type 2 diabetes. CANA can regulate intracellular glucose metabolism and exert anti-inflammatory effects in immune cells. Alveolar macrophage polarization balance is often associated with lower inflammation in acute lung injury (ALI). However, little is known about the anti-inflammatory effect of CANA on ALI.

METHODS

This study aimed to determine the effect of CANA on ALI as well as its potential ability to modulate alveolar macrophage polarization in ALI mouse models and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs).

RESULTS

The histopathological changes indicated that CANA alleviated lung injury in lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI mice models and exerted anti-inflammatory effects in the presence of lower levels of tumor necrosis factor-ɑ, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum. Moreover, flow cytometry analysis of mouse BALF cells and BMDMs demonstrated that CANA can modulate and reconstitute M1 and M2 macrophage balance, inhibiting macrophages with the M1 phenotype while promoting macrophages to shift to the M2 phenotype. Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were also performed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that CANA alleviates lung injury and exerts anti-inflammatory effects by modulating alveolar macrophage polarization balance, suggesting that CANA might act as a novel anti-inflammatory drug for treating ALI.

Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review

Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51–57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29–41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38–100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15–63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10–78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10–20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78–86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44–52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories.

Metabolic Imaging and Biological Assessment: Platforms to Evaluate Acute Lung Injury and Inflammation

Pulmonary inflammation is a hallmark of several pulmonary disorders including acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, it has been shown that patients with hyperinflammatory phenotype have a significantly higher mortality rate. Despite this, current therapeutic approaches focus on managing the injury rather than subsiding the inflammatory burden of the lung. This is because of the lack of appropriate non-invasive biomarkers that can be used clinically to assess pulmonary inflammation. In this review, we discuss two metabolic imaging tools that can be used to non-invasively assess lung inflammation. The first method, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), is widely used in clinical oncology and quantifies flux in metabolic pathways by measuring uptake of a radiolabeled molecule into the cells. The second method, hyperpolarized ¹³C MRI, is an emerging tool that interrogates the branching points of the metabolic pathways to quantify the fate of metabolites. We discuss the differences and similarities between these techniques and discuss their clinical applications.

Catching our breath: reshaping rehabilitation services for COVID-19

PURPOSE

War and natural disaster have been spurs to the creation of rehabilitation services. The COVID-19 pandemic poses a different question for existing rehabilitation services: how best to respond to a disaster that is anticipated from afar, but whose shape has yet to take full form?

METHODS

Applying the 5-phase crisis management model of Pearson and Mitroff, we report our experience at one of Scotland's largest centres for rehabilitation, in planning to cope with COVID-19.

RESULTS

Contingency rehabilitation planning can be framed in a 5-phase crisis management model that includes (i) signal detection; (ii) prevention/preparedness; (iii) damage limitation; (iv) recovery; and (v) learning. We have reported the impact of COVID-19 on rehabilitation services within a Scottish context and shared some of our learning.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 has challenged healthcare worldwide and has served as an amplifier for the recognised ill effects of poverty and inequality. As rehabilitation clinicians, we are in a position to continue advocating for people facing disability, and also seeking and responding to signals of COVID-19's late effects in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients alike. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION COVID-19 has resulted in unprecedented challenges in rehabilitation service planning. Contingency rehabilitation planning can be framed in a 5-phase crisis management model of Pearson and Mitroff, including (i) signal detection; (ii) prevention/preparedness; (iii) damage limitation; (iv) recovery; and (v) learning. COVID-19 has served as an amplifier for the recognised ill effects of poverty and inequality; as rehabilitation clinicians, we are in a position to continue advocating for people facing disability, and also seeking and responding to signals of COVID-19's late effects in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients alike.

Rate and Modifiable Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the United States

Background

The 30-day readmission rates are being used as a quality measure by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for specific medical and surgical conditions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States (US). The characteristics and predictors of 30-day readmission in ARDS patients in the US are not widely known, which we have depicted in our study.

Objective

The aim of this study is to identify 30-day readmission rates, characteristics, and predictors of ARDS patients using the largest publicly available nationwide database.

Methods

We used the National Readmission Database from the year 2013 to extract the patients with ARDS by primary discharge diagnosis with ICD9-CM codes. All-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rates were calculated for patients admitted between January and November 2013. The independent predictors for unplanned 30-day readmission were identified by survey logistic regression.

Results

After excluding elective readmission, the all-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rate for ARDS patients was 18%. Index admissions readmitted within 30-day had a significantly higher baseline burden of comorbidities with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥1 as compared to those who were not readmitted within 30 days. In multivariate regression analysis, several predictors associated with 30-day readmission were self-pay/no charge/other (OR 1.19, 95%CI: 1.02-1.38; p = 0.02), higher-income class (OR 0.86, 95%CI:0.79-0.99; p = 0.03), private insurance (OR 0.81, 95%CI:0.67-0.94; p = 0.01), and teaching metropolitan hospital (OR 0.72, 95%CI:0.61-0.94; p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The unplanned 30-day readmission rates are higher in ARDS patients in the US. Several modifiable factors such as insurance, socioeconomic status, and hospital type are associated with 30-day readmission among ARDS patients.

Historic review of long-term outcomes research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the results from long-term intensive care outcome research over the past 50 years. Key findings from early studies are reflected in citations of contemporary research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The postintensive care syndrome (PICS) is a multifaceted entity of residual disability and complications burdening survivors of critical illness. Some interventions applied early in the history of outcomes research have now been confirmed as effective in counteracting specific PICS components.

SUMMARY

Interest in patient-centred outcomes has been present since the beginning of modern intensive care. Findings from early long-term studies remain valid even in the face of contemporary large registries that facilitate follow-up of larger cohorts. A further understanding of the mechanisms leading to experienced physical and psychological impairment of PICS will be essential to the design of future intervention trials.

Long-Term Outcome after Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. A Long-Term Acute-Care Hospital Study

Rationale: Patients managed at a long-term acute-care hospital (LTACH) for weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation are at risk for profound muscle weakness and disability. Objectives: To investigate effects of prolonged ventilation on survival, muscle function, and its impact on quality of life at 6 and 12 months after LTACH discharge. Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal study conducted in 315 patients being weaned from prolonged ventilation at an LTACH. Measurements and Main Results: At discharge, 53.7% of patients were detached from the ventilator and 1-year survival was 66.9%. On enrollment, maximum inspiratory pressure (Pi_max) was 41.3 (95% confidence interval, 39.4-43.2) cm H₂O (53.1% predicted), whereas handgrip strength was 16.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.4-18.7) kPa (21.5% predicted). At discharge, Pi_max did not change, whereas handgrip strength increased by 34.8% (P < 0.001). Between discharge and 6 months, handgrip strength increased 6.2 times more than did Pi_max. Between discharge and 6 months, Katz activities-of-daily-living summary score improved by 64.4%; improvement in Katz summary score was related to improvement in handgrip strength (r = -0.51; P < 0.001). By 12 months, physical summary score and mental summary score of 36-item Short-Form Survey returned to preillness values. When asked, 84.7% of survivors indicated willingness to undergo mechanical ventilation again. Conclusions: Among patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation at an LTACH, 53.7% were detached from the ventilator at discharge and 1-year survival was 66.9%. Respiratory strength was well maintained, whereas peripheral strength was severely impaired throughout hospitalization. Six months after discharge, improvement in muscle function enabled patients to perform daily activities, and 84.7% indicated willingness to undergo mechanical ventilation again.

An NMR based panorama of the heterogeneous biology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from the standpoint of metabolic biomarkers

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), manifested by intricate etiology and pathophysiology, demands careful clinical surveillance due to its high mortality and imminent life support measures. NMR based metabolomics provides an approach for ARDS which culminates from a wide spectrum of illness thereby confounding early manifestation and prognosis predictors. ¹ H NMR with its manifold applications in critical disease settings can unravel the biomarker of ARDS thus holding potent implications by providing surrogate endpoints of clinical utility. NMR metabolomics which is the current apogee platform of omics trilogy is contributing towards the possible panacea of ARDS by subsequent validation of biomarker credential on larger datasets. In the present review, the physiological derangements that jeopardize the whole metabolic functioning in ARDS are exploited and the biomarkers involved in progression are addressed and substantiated. The following sections of the review also outline the clinical spectrum of ARDS from the standpoint of NMR based metabolomics which is an emerging element of systems biology. ARDS is the main premise of intensivists textbook, which has been thoroughly reviewed along with its incidence, progressive stages of severity, new proposed diagnostic definition, and the preventive measures and the current pitfalls of clinical management. The advent of new therapies, the need for biomarkers, the methodology and the contemporary promising approaches needed to improve survival and address heterogeneity have also been evaluated. The review has been stepwise illustrated with potent biometrics employed to selectively pool out differential metabolites as diagnostic markers and outcome predictors. The following sections have been drafted with an objective to better understand ARDS mechanisms with predictive and precise biomarkers detected so far on the basis of underlying physiological parameters having close proximity to diseased phenotype. The aim of this review is to stimulate interest in conducting more studies to help resolve the complex heterogeneity of ARDS with biomarkers of clinical utility and relevance.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Prone Positioning

Acute respiratory distress syndrome continues to have high morbidity and mortality despite more than 50 years of research. The Berlin definition in 2012 established risk stratification based on degree of hypoxemia and the use of positive end-expiratory pressure. The use of prone positioning as a treatment modality has been studied for more than 40 years, with recent studies showing an improvement in oxygenation and decreased mortality. The studies also provide evidence to support the methodology and length of treatment time. Recent guidelines include several ventilator strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome, including prone positioning. Protocols and procedures discussed in this article ensure successful prone repositioning and prevention of complications related to the procedure itself.