1
|
Zampieri FG, Ezekowitz JA. The "Small" Clinical Trial: Methods, Analysis, and Interpretation in Acute Care Cardiology. Can J Cardiol 2025; 41:656-668. [PMID: 39536916 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2024] [Revised: 11/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials in acute care settings, particularly those involving small populations or high mortality contexts, present unique challenges in design and analysis. In this review we explore novel statistical approaches and methodological considerations for such trials, with a focus on cardiovascular therapies. We discuss the concept of "small" sample sizes and their limitations and cover various analytical frameworks, including frequentist and Bayesian approaches, and emphasize their implications for result interpretation and reproducibility. We examine end points such as "days alive and free specific to disease state," which combines mortality and morbidity measures, the win ratio for hierarchical end points, and ordinal scales that capture detailed patient outcomes. These methods potentially increase statistical power and provide more clinically relevant measures compared with traditional binary outcomes; an extensive use of simulations is used to clarify this point. The use of longitudinal ordinal models is presented as a promising method to capture complex patient trajectories over time, offering insights into treatment effects at various disease stages. We also address the potential of adaptive platform trials for rare conditions, allowing for more efficient use of limited patient populations. In this overview we aim to guide researchers and clinicians in selecting optimal trial designs and analytical strategies, to ultimately improve the quality, efficiency, and interpretability of evidence in acute care cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando G Zampieri
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Justin A Ezekowitz
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Whitney JE, Johnson GM, Varisco BM, Raby BA, Yehya N. Biomarker-Based Risk Stratification Tool in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Single-Center, Longitudinal Validation in a 2014-2019 Cohort. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25:599-608. [PMID: 38591949 PMCID: PMC11222043 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Biomarker Risk Model (PARDSEVERE) used age and three plasma biomarkers measured within 24 hours of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) onset to predict mortality in a pilot cohort of 152 patients. However, longitudinal performance of PARDSEVERE has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether the risk model can be used to prognosticate after day 0. We, therefore, sought to determine the test characteristics of PARDSEVERE model and population over the first 7 days after ARDS onset. DESIGN Secondary unplanned post hoc analysis of data from a prospective observational cohort study carried out 2014-2019. SETTING University-affiliated PICU. PATIENTS Mechanically ventilated children with ARDS. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Between July 2014 and December 2019, 279 patients with ARDS had plasma collected at day 0, 266 at day 3 (11 nonsurvivors, two discharged between days 0 and 3), and 207 at day 7 (27 nonsurvivors, 45 discharged between days 3 and 7). The actual prevalence of mortality on days 0, 3, and 7, was 23% (64/279), 14% (38/266), and 13% (27/207), respectively. The PARDSEVERE risk model for mortality on days 0, 3, and 7 had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC [95% CI]) of 0.76 (0.69-0.82), 0.68 (0.60-0.76), and 0.74 (0.65-0.83), respectively. The AUROC data translate into prevalence thresholds for the PARDSEVERE model for mortality (i.e., using the sensitivity and specificity values) of 37%, 27%, and 24% on days 0, 3, and 7, respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) was high throughout (0.87-0.90 for all three-time points). CONCLUSIONS In this exploratory analysis of the PARDSEVERE model of mortality risk prediction in a population longitudinal series of data from days 0, 3, and 7 after ARDS diagnosis, the diagnostic performance is in the "acceptable" category. NPV was good. A major limitation is that actual mortality is far below the prevalence threshold for such testing. The model may, therefore, be more useful in cohorts with higher mortality rates (e.g., immunocompromised, other countries), and future enhancements to the model should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Whitney
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Grace M Johnson
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Brian M Varisco
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Benjamin A Raby
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nadir Yehya
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaher F, Diallo M, Achim AM, Joober R, Roy MA, Demers MF, Subramanian P, Lavigne KM, Lepage M, Gonzalez D, Zeljkovic I, Davis K, Mackinley M, Sabesan P, Lal S, Voppel A, Palaniyappan L. Speech markers to predict and prevent recurrent episodes of psychosis: A narrative overview and emerging opportunities. Schizophr Res 2024; 266:205-215. [PMID: 38428118 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Preventing relapse in schizophrenia improves long-term health outcomes. Repeated episodes of psychotic symptoms shape the trajectory of this illness and can be a detriment to functional recovery. Despite early intervention programs, high relapse rates persist, calling for alternative approaches in relapse prevention. Predicting imminent relapse at an individual level is critical for effective intervention. While clinical profiles are often used to foresee relapse, they lack the specificity and sensitivity needed for timely prediction. Here, we review the use of speech through Natural Language Processing (NLP) to predict a recurrent psychotic episode. Recent advancements in NLP of speech have shown the ability to detect linguistic markers related to thought disorder and other language disruptions within 2-4 weeks preceding a relapse. This approach has shown to be able to capture individual speech patterns, showing promise in its use as a prediction tool. We outline current developments in remote monitoring for psychotic relapses, discuss the challenges and limitations and present the speech-NLP based approach as an alternative to detect relapses with sufficient accuracy, construct validity and lead time to generate clinical actions towards prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farida Zaher
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mariama Diallo
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amélie M Achim
- Département de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; Vitam - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Québec City, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche CERVO, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Ridha Joober
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc-André Roy
- Département de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche CERVO, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-France Demers
- Centre de Recherche CERVO, Québec City, QC, Canada; Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Priya Subramanian
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Katie M Lavigne
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Lepage
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniela Gonzalez
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis, London Health Sciences Center, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Irnes Zeljkovic
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kristin Davis
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Mackinley
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis, London Health Sciences Center, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Priyadharshini Sabesan
- Lakeshore General Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shalini Lal
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada; School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alban Voppel
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lena Palaniyappan
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tran A, Rochwerg B, Fan E, Belohlavek J, Suverein MM, Poll MCGVD, Lorusso R, Price S, Yannopoulos D, MacLaren G, Ramanathan K, Ling RR, Thiara S, Tonna JE, Shekar K, Hodgson CL, Scales DC, Sandroni C, Nolan JP, Slutsky AS, Combes A, Brodie D, Fernando SM. Prognostic factors associated with favourable functional outcome among adult patients requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2023; 193:110004. [PMID: 37863420 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has demonstrated promise in the management of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, evidence from observational studies and clinical trials are conflicting and the factors influencing outcome have not been well established. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the association between pre-ECPR prognostic factors and likelihood of good functional outcome among adult patients requiring ECPR for OHCA. We searched Medline and Embase databases from inception to February 28, 2023 and screened studies with two independent reviewers. We performed meta-analyses of unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, adjusted hazard ratios and mean differences separately. We assessed risk of bias using the QUIPS tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. FINDINGS We included 29 observational and randomized studies involving 7,397 patients. Factors with moderate or high certainty of association with increased survival with favourable functional outcome include pre-arrest patient factors, such as younger age (odds ratio (OR) 2.13, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.99) and female sex (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.70), as well as intra-arrest factors, such as shockable rhythm (OR 2.79, 95% CI 2.04 to 3.80), witnessed arrest (OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.42), bystander CPR (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.01), return of spontaneous circulation (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.61) and shorter time to cannulation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.69 per 10 minutes). INTERPRETATION The findings of this review confirm several clinical concepts wellestablished in the cardiac arrest literature and their applicability to the patient for whom ECPR is considered - that is, the impact of pre-existing patient factors, the benefit of timely and effective CPR, as well as the prognostic importance of minimizing low-flow time. We advocate for the thoughtful consideration of these prognostic factors as part of a risk stratification framework when evaluating a patient's potential candidacy for ECPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Tran
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Belohlavek
- 2(nd) Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martje M Suverein
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel C G van de Poll
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Susanna Price
- Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Demetris Yannopoulos
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kollengode Ramanathan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Ruiyang Ling
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sonny Thiara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Joseph E Tonna
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kiran Shekar
- Adult Intensive Care Services and Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane and Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carol L Hodgson
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care-Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Damon C Scales
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Sandroni
- Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jerry P Nolan
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | - Arthur S Slutsky
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France; Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut de Cardiologie, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shannon M Fernando
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care, Lakeridge Health Corporation, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson S, Sommer N, Cox-Flaherty K, Weissmann N, Ventetuolo CE, Maron BA. Pulmonary Hypertension: A Contemporary Review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 208:528-548. [PMID: 37450768 PMCID: PMC10492255 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0327so] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Major advances in pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with lung disease, and chronic thromboembolic PH cast new light on the pathogenetic mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnostic approach, and therapeutic armamentarium for pulmonary vascular disease. Here, we summarize key basic, translational, and clinical PH reports, emphasizing findings that build on current state-of-the-art research. This review includes cutting-edge progress in translational pulmonary vascular biology, with a guide to the diagnosis of patients in clinical practice, incorporating recent PH definition revisions that continue emphasis on early detection of disease. PH management is reviewed including an overview of the evolving considerations for the approach to treatment of PH in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities, as well as a discussion of the groundbreaking sotatercept data for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelsey Johnson
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and
| | - Natascha Sommer
- Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary Institute, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | | | - Norbert Weissmann
- Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary Institute, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Corey E. Ventetuolo
- Department of Medicine and
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bradley A. Maron
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep, and Critical Care Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
- The University of Maryland-Institute for Health Computing, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sandroni C, Natalini D, Nolan JP. Temperature control after cardiac arrest. Crit Care 2022; 26:361. [PMID: 36434649 PMCID: PMC9700892 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04238-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Most of the patients who die after cardiac arrest do so because of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). Experimental evidence shows that temperature control targeted at hypothermia mitigates HIBI. In 2002, one randomized trial and one quasi-randomized trial showed that temperature control targeted at 32-34 °C improved neurological outcome and mortality in patients who are comatose after cardiac arrest. However, following the publication of these trials, other studies have questioned the neuroprotective effects of hypothermia. In 2021, the largest study conducted so far on temperature control (the TTM-2 trial) including 1900 adults comatose after resuscitation showed no effect of temperature control targeted at 33 °C compared with normothermia or fever control. A systematic review of 32 trials published between 2001 and 2021 concluded that temperature control with a target of 32-34 °C compared with fever prevention did not result in an improvement in survival (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.89-1.30) or favorable functional outcome (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.91-1.61) at 90-180 days after resuscitation. There was substantial heterogeneity across the trials, and the certainty of the evidence was low. Based on these results, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation currently recommends monitoring core temperature and actively preventing fever (37.7 °C) for at least 72 h in patients who are comatose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Future studies are needed to identify potential patient subgroups who may benefit from temperature control aimed at hypothermia. There are no trials comparing normothermia or fever control with no temperature control after cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Sandroni
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS. Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart. Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS. L.go F, Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Daniele Natalini
- Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS. Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Jerry P Nolan
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of temperature targets. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:1078-1088. [PMID: 34389870 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06505-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Targeted temperature management (TTM) may improve survival and functional outcome in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), though the optimal target temperature remains unknown. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of deep hypothermia (31-32 °C), moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C), mild hypothermia (35-36 °C), and normothermia (37-37.8 °C) during TTM. METHODS We searched six databases from inception to June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating TTM in comatose OHCA survivors. Two reviewers performed screening, full text review, and extraction independently. The primary outcome of interest was survival with good functional outcome. We used GRADE to rate our certainty in estimates. RESULTS We included 10 RCTs (4218 patients). Compared with normothermia, deep hypothermia (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-2.30), moderate hypothermia (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.92-1.94) and mild hypothermia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.74-2.80) may have no effect on survival with good functional outcome (all low certainty). Deep hypothermia may not improve survival with good functional outcome, as compared to moderate hypothermia (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.61-1.54, low certainty). Moderate hypothermia (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.86-1.77) and deep hypothermia (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.32) may have no effect on survival, as compared to normothermia. Finally, incidence of arrhythmia was higher with moderate hypothermia (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.08-1.94) and deep hypothermia (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.77-7.26), compared to normothermia (both high certainty). CONCLUSIONS Mild, moderate, or deep hypothermia may not improve survival or functional outcome after OHCA, as compared to normothermia. Moderate and deep hypothermia were associated with higher incidence of arrhythmia. Routine use of moderate or deep hypothermia in comatose survivors of OHCA may potentially be associated with more harm than benefit.
Collapse
|