Reduced COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients Treated with Biologic Therapies for Asthma

Viral infections causing asthma exacerbations in the age of biologics and the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma exacerbations are associated with substantial symptom burden and healthcare costs. Viral infections are the most common identified cause of asthma exacerbations. The epidemiology of viral respiratory infections has undergone a significant evolution during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between viruses and asthmatic hosts has long been recognized but it is still incompletely understood. The use of newly approved asthma biologics has helped us understand this interaction better.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review recent updates on the interaction between asthma and respiratory viruses, and we address how biologics and immunotherapies could affect this relationship by altering the respiratory mucosa cytokine milieu. By exploring the evolving epidemiological landscape of viral infections during the different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, we emphasize the early post-pandemic stage, where a resurgence of pre-pandemic viruses with atypical seasonality patterns occurred. Finally, we discuss the newly developed RSV and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how they reduce respiratory infections.

SUMMARY

Characterizing how respiratory viruses interact with asthmatic hosts will allow us to identify tailored therapies to reduce the burden of asthma exacerbations. New vaccination strategies are likely to shape the future viral asthma exacerbation landscape.

SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine dose significantly extends humoral immune response half-life beyond the primary series

SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines continue to be administered as the predominant prophylactic measure to reduce COVID-19 disease pathogenesis. Quantifying the kinetics of the secondary immune response from subsequent doses beyond the primary series and understanding how dose-dependent immune waning kinetics vary as a function of age, sex, and various comorbidities remains an important question. We study anti-spike IgG waning kinetics in 152 individuals who received an mRNA-based primary series (first two doses) and a subset of 137 individuals who then received an mRNA-based booster dose. We find the booster dose elicits a 71-84% increase in the median Anti-S half life over that of the primary series. We find the Anti-S half life for both primary series and booster doses decreases with age. However, we stress that although chronological age continues to be a good proxy for vaccine-induced humoral waning, immunosenescence is likely not the mechanism, rather, more likely the mechanism is related to the presence of noncommunicable diseases, which also accumulate with age, that affect immune regulation. We are able to independently reproduce recent observations that those with pre-existing asthma exhibit a stronger primary series humoral response to vaccination than compared to those that do not, and further, we find this result is sustained for the booster dose. Finally, via a single-variate Kruskal-Wallis test we find no difference between male and female humoral decay kinetics, however, a multivariate approach utilizing  Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression for feature selection reveals a statistically significant (p < 1 × 10 - 3 ), albeit small, bias in favour of longer-lasting humoral immunity amongst males.

Systems biology of B cells in COVID-19

The integration of multi-'omic datasets into complex systems-wide assessments has become a mainstay in immunologic investigation. This focus on high-dimensional data collection and analysis was on full display in the investigation of COVID-19, the respiratory illness resulting from infection by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Particularly in the area of B cell biology, tremendous efforts in both cellular and serologic investigation have resulted in an increasingly detailed mapping of the coordinated effector, memory, and antibody secreting cell responses that underpin the development of humoral immunity in response to primary viral infection. Further, the rapid development and deployment of effective vaccines has allowed for the assessment of developing memory responses across a wide variety of immune contexts, including in patients with compromised immune function. The result has been a period of rapid gains in the understanding of B cell biology unrestricted to the study of COVID-19. Here, we outline the systems-level technologies that have been routinely implemented in these investigations throughout the pandemic, and discuss how their use has led to clear and applicable gains in pursuance of the amelioration of human infectious disease and beyond.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and asthma: What we have learned and what is still unknown

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has brought new insights into the immunologic intricacies of asthma. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of asthma in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of severe infection. Type 2 inflammation had an overall protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection by various mechanisms summarized in this review. Asthma, intranasal, and inhaled corticosteroids decreased the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, an important receptor for SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells. We summarize the nuances of the treatment of type 2 inflammation despite its underlying protective effects. Research to date has shown that patients on various allergen immunotherapies and biologics do benefit from being vaccinated.

COVID-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy in Chinese patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Both patients and physicians may be hesitant toward vaccination in patients with asthma, which may result in lower vaccine uptake. The aim of this work was to investigate the vaccination rate, the adverse reactions, as well as the factors associated with vaccine acceptance and hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccination among asthmatic patients in Beijing.

METHODS

A multi-center, cross-sectional face-to-face survey was conducted in patients with asthma consecutively recruited from December 2021 to April 2022. The survey included asthma status, COVID-19 vaccine uptake and adverse reactions, and knowledge of and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients were enrolled. The rate of COVID-19 vaccination during the study period was 73.6%, as compared to 87.64% in the general population in China. Patients who were currently working, had received other vaccines in the past, and had had no adverse reactions to other vaccines, showed a higher rate of COVID-19 vaccination. Patients believing that the vaccination of family members and colleagues had a positive impact on their decision to get vaccinated, were more likely to get the COVID-19 vaccines. The COVID-19 vaccination rate was lower in those with poorly monitored asthma and those using biologic therapies. The adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in asthmatic patients were similar to those in the general population.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 vaccination rate in asthmatic patients was lower than the general population in China. Active measures should be taken to control asthma and increase vaccination rates in these patients.

Inhaled ciclesonide does not affect production of antibodies or elimination of virus in patients with COVID-19: Subanalysis of a multicenter, open-label randomized trial

During an earlier multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose inhaled ciclesonide in patients with asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we observed that worsening of shadows on CT without worsening of clinical symptoms was more common with ciclesonide. The present study sought to determine if an association exists between worsening CT shadows and impaired antibody production in patients treated with inhaled ciclesonide. Eighty-nine of the 90 patients in the original study were prospectively enrolled. After exclusions, there were 36 patients each in the ciclesonide and control groups. We analyzed antibody titers against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid protein at various time points. Changes in viral load during treatment were compared. There was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, background clinical characteristics, or symptoms between the two groups. Although evaluation on day 8 suggested a greater tendency for worsening shadows on CT in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.072), there was no significant difference between them in the ability to produce antibodies (p = 0.379) or the maximum antibody titer during the clinical course. In both groups, worsening CT shadows and higher viral loads were observed on days 1-8, suggesting ciclesonide does not affect clearance of the virus (p = 0.134). High-dose inhaled ciclesonide did not impair production of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 or affect elimination of the virus, suggesting that this treatment can be used safely in patients with COVID-19 patients who use inhaled steroids for asthma and other diseases.

COVID-19 and Its Impact on Common Diseases in the Allergy Clinics

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious viral disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It has various effects on asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria and may change the course of the disease depending on the severity of the infection and control status of the disease. Conversely, these diseases may also impact the course of COVID-19. Patients with chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis may have COVID-19-induced disease exacerbations and biological treatments reduce the risk of exacerbations. Poor asthma control is linked to severe COVID-19 while allergic asthma is associated with lower risk of death and a lower rate of hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared with nonallergic asthma. The use of intranasal corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with allergic rhinitis, whereas the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is confounded by asthma severity. These observations reinforce the importance of keeping allergic diseases under control during pandemics. The use of biologicals during COVID-19 is generally regarded as safe, but more evidence is needed. The pandemic substantially changed the management of allergic disorders such as home implementation of various biologicals, allergen immunotherapy, food introduction, and increased use of telemedicine and even home management of anaphylaxis to reduce emergency department burden and reduce risk of infection. Physicians need to be aware of the potential impact of COVID-19 on allergic diseases and educate their patients on the importance of continuing prescribed medications and adhering to their treatment plans to maintain optimal control of their disease.

Effect of biologic therapy on the humoral immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with asthma

The effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and biologics on the humoral immune response following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination in patients with asthma is unknown. We prospectively evaluated the humoral immune response 3 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) after the second dose of BNT162b2 in 30 SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients with asthma. We measured anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers and serum-neutralizing activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain. The anti-spike IgG titer and neutralizing activity did not differ significantly between the biologics and non-biologics groups at T1 (P = 0.708 and P = 0.417, respectively) or T2 (P = 0.299 and P = 0.492, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age and sex were significantly associated with the magnitude of the humoral immune response; however, the use of biologics and ICS dose were not, suggesting that these would not affect BNT162b2 immunogenicity in patients with asthma. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Asthma in the era of COVID-19

Since its global invasion in 2019, COVID-19 has affected several aspects of patients' lives and posed a significant impact on the health care system. Several patient populations were identified to be at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or developing severe COVID-19-related sequelae. Conversely, anyone who has contracted SARS-CoV-2 is at risk to experience symptoms and signs consistent with post-COVID manifestations. Patients with asthma were initially thought to be at increased risk and severity for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, accumulating evidence demonstrates that asthma endotypes/phenotypes and comorbidities influence the risk stratification in this population. Furthermore, initial concerns about the potentially increased risk of poor outcomes with asthma treatments such as inhaled corticosteroids and biologics have not been substantiated. In this review, we provide an update on COVID-19 and asthma, including risk of susceptibility, clinical manifestations and course in this population as well as discuss recommendations for management.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces an intranasal mucosal response characterized by neutralizing antibodies

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine-induced systemic antibody profiles are well characterized; however, little is known about whether intranasal mucosal antibodies are induced or can neutralize virus in response to mRNA vaccination.

Objective

We sought to evaluate intranasal mucosal antibody production with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Methods

SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA concentrations and neutralization activity from sera and nasal mucosa via nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) collection were measured in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-vaccinated healthy volunteers (N = 29) by using multiplex immunoassays. Data were compared before and after vaccination, between mRNA vaccine brands, and by sex.

Results

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induced an intranasal immune response characterized by neutralizing mucosal antibodies. IgG antibodies displayed greater Spike 1 (S1) binding specificity than did IgA in serum and nasal mucosa. Nasal antibodies displayed greater neutralization activity against the receptor-binding domain than serum. Spikevax (Moderna)-vaccinated individuals displayed greater SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibody concentrations than did Comirnaty (BioNTech/Pfizer)-vaccinated individuals in their serum and nasal epithelial lining fluid. Sex-dependent differences in antibody response were not observed.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces a robust systemic and intranasal antibody production with neutralizing capacity. Spikevax vaccinations elicit a greater antibody response than does Comirnaty vaccination systemically and intranasally.

Covid-19 pandemic and asthma: What did we learn?

This review addresses some of the major lessons we have learnt regarding asthma and the covid-19 pandemic, including susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19, potentially protective factors, comparison to other respiratory infections, changes in healthcare behaviour from the perspective of patients and clinicians, medications to treat or prevent covid-19, and post-covid syndrome.

Reduced COVID-19 vaccine response in patient treated with dupilumab for IgG4-related disease

Dupilumab is a novel anti-IL-4 receptor-α mAb that targets the signaling pathways of IL-4 and IL-13. Thus far, the data about adequate humoral immune response after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients who are taking dupilumab have been limited.

The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Increases the Contractile Sensitivity to Histamine and Parasympathetic Activation in a Human Ex Vivo Model of Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine is composed of lipid-nanoparticles (LNP) containing the mRNA that encodes for SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Bronchospasm has been reported as an early reaction after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in asthmatic patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute impact of BNT162b2 in a human ex vivo model of severe eosinophilic asthma. Passively sensitized human isolated bronchi were challenged with the platelet-activating factor to reproduce ex vivo the hyperresponsiveness of airways of patients suffering from severe eosinophilic asthma. BNT162b2 was tested on the contractile sensitivity to histamine and parasympathetic activation via electrical field stimulation (EFS); some experiments were performed after mRNA denaturation. BNT162b2 increased the resting tone (+11.82 ± 2.27%) and response to histamine in partially contracted tissue (+42.97 ± 9.64%) vs. the control (p < 0.001); it also shifted the concentration-response curve to histamine leftward (0.76 ± 0.09 logarithm) and enhanced the response to EFS (+28.46 ± 4.40%) vs. the control. Denaturation did not significantly modify (p > 0.05) the effect of BNT162b2. BNT162b2 increases the contractile sensitivity to histamine and parasympathetic activation in hyperresponsive airways, a detrimental effect not related to the active component but to some excipient. A possible candidate for the bronchospasm elicited by BNT162b2 could be the polyethylene glycol/macrogol used to produce LNP.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis and COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised awareness about olfactory dysfunction, although a loss of smell was present in the general population before COVID-19. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common upper airway chronic inflammatory disease that is also one of the most common causes of olfactory dysfunction. It can be classified into different phenotypes (ie, with and without nasal polyps) and endotypes (ie, type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation). However, scientific information regarding CRS within the context of COVID-19 is still scarce. This review focuses on (1) the potential effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection on CRS symptoms, including a loss of smell, and comorbidities; (2) the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the olfactory dysfunction; (3) CRS diagnosis in the context of COVID-19, including telemedicine; (4) the protective hypothesis of CRS in COVID-19; and (5) the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for CRS within the context of COVID-19.

Short and Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Previous Respiratory Diseases

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. Till now, it affected 452.4 million (Spain, 11.18 million) persons all over the world with a total of 6.04 million of deaths (Spain, 100,992). It is observed that 75% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients have at least one COVID-19 associated comorbidity. It was shown that people with underlying chronic illnesses are more likely to get it and grow seriously ill. Individuals with COVID-19 who have a past medical history of cardiovascular disorder, cancer, obesity, chronic lung disease, diabetes, or neurological disease had the worst prognosis and are more likely to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome or pneumonia. COVID-19 can affect the respiratory system in a variety of ways and across a spectrum of levels of disease severity, depending on a person's immune system, age and comorbidities. Symptoms can range from mild, such as cough, shortness of breath and fever, to critical disease, including respiratory failure, shock and multi-organ system failure. So, COVID-19 infection can cause overall worsening of these previous respiratory diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, etc. This review aims to provide information on the impact of the COVID-19 disease on pre-existing lung comorbidities.