Kinetics of immune cell infiltration in vaccinia virus keratitis

Mapping Resident Immune Cells in the Murine Ocular Surface and Lacrimal Gland by Flow Cytometry

BACKGROUND

The ocular surface and lacrimal gland have a frontline position in mucosal immunology. However, there have been few updates to the immune cell atlas of these tissues in recent years.

PURPOSE

To map the immune cells in murine ocular surface tissues and lacrimal gland.

METHODS

Central and peripheral corneas, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland were dissociated into single cell suspensions, followed by flow cytometry. Discrepancy of immune cells between the central and peripheral corneas was compared. In the conjunctiva and lacrimal gland, myeloid cells were clustered by tSNE and FlowSOM based on the expression of F4/80, Ly6C, Ly6G, and MHC II. ILCs, type 1 immune cells, and type 3 immune cells were analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of immune cells in peripheral corneas was about 16 folds of that in central corneas. B cells accounted for 8.74% of immune cells in murine peripheral corneas. In the conjunctiva and lacrimal gland, most myeloid cells tended out to be monocytes, macrophages, and classical dendritic cells (cDCs). ILC3 were 6.28% and 3.63% of ILCs in the conjunctiva and lacrimal gland, respectively. Th1, Tc1, and NK cells were predominant type 1 immune cells. γδ T17 cells and ILC3 outnumbered Th17 cells among type 3 T cells.

CONCLUSION

B cells resident in murine corneas were reported for the first time. Additionally, we proposed a strategy of clustering myeloid cells to better understand their heterogeneity in the conjunctiva and lacrimal gland based on tSNE and FlowSOM. Furthermore, we identified the ILC3 in the conjunctiva and lacrimal gland for the first time. Compositions of type 1 and type 3 immune cells were summarized. Our study provides a fundamental reference and novel insights for ocular surface immune homeostasis and diseases.

Pathobiology and treatment of viral keratitis

Keratitis is one of the most prevalent ocular diseases manifested by partial or total loss of vision. Amongst infectious (viz., microbes including bacteria, fungi, amebae, and viruses) and non-infectious (viz., eye trauma, chemical exposure, and ultraviolet exposure, contact lens) risk factors, viral keratitis has been demonstrated as one of the leading causes of corneal opacity. While many viruses have been shown to cause keratitis (such as rhabdoviruses, coxsackieviruses, etc.), herpesviruses are the predominant etiologic agent of viral keratitis. This chapter will summarize current knowledge on the prevalence, diagnosis, and pathobiology of viral keratitis. Virus-mediated immunomodulation of host innate and adaptive immune components is critical for viral persistence, and dysfunctional immune responses may cause destruction of ocular tissues leading to keratitis. Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised individuals may display recurring disease with pronounced severity. Early diagnosis of viral keratitis is beneficial for disease management and response to treatment. Finally, we have discussed current and emerging therapies to treat viral keratitis.

Both CD8+ and CD4+ T Cells Contribute to Corneal Clouding and Viral Clearance following Vaccinia Virus Infection in C57BL/6 Mice

Vaccinia virus (VACV) keratitis is a serious complication following smallpox vaccination and can lead to blindness. The pathological mechanisms involved in ocular VACV infection are poorly understood. Previous studies have used rabbits, but the lack of immune reagents and transgenic or knockout animals makes them less suitable for mechanistic studies. We report that infection of C57BL/6 mice with 1 × 10(7) PFU of vaccinia virus strain WR results in blepharitis, corneal neovascularization, and stromal keratitis. The DryVax strain of VACV was completely attenuated. Infection required corneal scarification and replication-competent virus, and the severity of ocular disease was similar in 4- to 6-week-old and 1-year-old mice. Viral titers peaked at approximately 1 × 10(6) PFU on day 5 postinfection, and virus had not cleared by day 13 postinfection. Neutrophils were found in the peripheral cornea on day 1 after infection and then declined, followed by infiltration of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, which remained peripheral throughout the infection. Blood vessel growth extended 2 to 5 mm into the cornea from the limbus. Infection of CD4(-/-), CD8(-/-), or antibody-depleted mice resulted in similar disease severity and corneal clouding, indicating that both T-cell subsets were involved in the immunopathological response. Depletion of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells resulted in significantly more severe disease and failure to clear the virus. On the basis of our results, the pathology of VACV keratitis is significantly different from that of herpes simplex virus keratitis. Further studies are likely to reveal novel information regarding virulence and immune responses to viral ocular infection.

IMPORTANCE

Potentially blinding eye infections can occur after vaccination for smallpox. Very little is known about the pathological mechanisms that are involved, and the information that is available was generated using rabbit models. The lack of immunological reagents for rabbits makes such studies difficult. We characterized a mouse model of vaccinia virus ocular disease using C57BL/6 mice and strain WR and show that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets play a role in the blinding eye disease and in controlling virus replication. On the basis of these results, vaccinia virus keratitis is significantly different from herpes simplex virus keratitis, and further studies using this model should generate novel insights into immunopathological responses to viral ocular infection.