1
|
Reutter M, Teigeler J, Gamer M. The influence of (social) anxiety and visual exploration on threat responding and generalization. Behav Res Ther 2025; 189:104746. [PMID: 40250248 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2025] [Accepted: 04/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/20/2025]
Abstract
Fear generalization has been identified as an important mechanism that might contribute to the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders. It is, however, yet unclear to what degree attentional processes contribute to overgeneralization of fear in clinical samples. To address this issue, we utilized a set of facial photographs that was meticulously created such that pairs of faces could either be distinguished by looking into the eyes or the region around mouth and nose, respectively. These pairs were then employed as CS+ and CS- in a differential fear conditioning paradigm followed by a generalization test with morphs in steps of 20 %, creating a continuum between CS+ and CS-. In a sample with diverse levels of social and general anxiety (N = 87), we demonstrated that the amount of fear generalization depends on attentional orienting towards diagnostic facial features. While social anxiety did not affect the shape of generalization gradients, we observed altered visual exploration patterns and a distinct multi-phasic heart rate modulation in participants with higher social anxiety. General anxiety symptomatology was also related to these characteristics of visual exploration and additionally predicted a broad elevation of threat ratings. In summary, fear generalization depends on attentional deployment. Future work should build on these findings to further explore these processes in clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Reutter
- Experimental Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Janna Teigeler
- Experimental Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Gamer
- Experimental Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kollenda D, Reher AS, de Haas B. Individual gaze predicts individual scene descriptions. Sci Rep 2025; 15:9443. [PMID: 40108359 PMCID: PMC11923161 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-94056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Do different people looking at the same scene perceive individual versions of what's in front of them? If perception is individual, which mechanisms mediate our particular view of the world? Recent findings have shown systematic observer differences in gaze, but it is unclear whether individual fixation biases translate to divergent impressions of the same scene. Here, we find systematic differences in the scene descriptions individual observers provide for identical complex scenes. Crucially, observer differences in fixation patterns predicted pairwise differences in scene descriptions, particularly the use of nouns, even for out-of-sample images. Part of this could be explained by the individual tendency to fixate text and people predicting corresponding description references. Our results strongly suggest that subjective scene perception is shaped by individual gaze.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Kollenda
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Marburg and Giessen, Germany.
| | | | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Marburg and Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hermann A, Benke C, Blecker CR, de Haas B, He Y, Hofmann SG, Iffland JR, Jengert-Stahl J, Kircher T, Leinweber K, Linka M, Mulert C, Neudert MK, Noll AK, Melzig CA, Rief W, Rothkopf C, Schäfer A, Schmitter CV, Schuster V, Stark R, Straube B, Zimmer RI, Kirchner L. Study protocol TransTAM: Transdiagnostic research into emotional disorders and cognitive-behavioral therapy of the adaptive mind. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:657. [PMID: 39369190 PMCID: PMC11456249 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety disorders share substantial similarities in their etiology and treatment. In recent decades, these commonalities have been increasingly recognized in classification systems and treatment programs crossing diagnostic boundaries. METHODS To examine the prospective effects of different transdiagnostic markers on relevant treatment outcomes, we plan to track a minimum of N = 200 patients with emotional disorders during their routine course of cognitive behavioral therapy at two German outpatient clinics. We will collect a wide range of transdiagnostic markers, ranging from basic perceptual processes and self-report measures to complex behavioral and neurobiological indicators, before entering therapy. Symptoms and psychopathological processes will be recorded before entering therapy, between the 20th and 24th therapy session, and at the end of therapy. DISCUSSION Our results could help to identify transdiagnostic markers with high predictive power, but also provide deeper insights into which patient groups with which symptom clusters are less likely to benefit from therapy, and for what reasons. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was preregistered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00031206; 2023-05-09).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Hermann
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Christoph Benke
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carlo R Blecker
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Yifei He
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Stefan G Hofmann
- Department of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jona R Iffland
- Center of Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Johanna Jengert-Stahl
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Leinweber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marcel Linka
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Christoph Mulert
- Center of Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marie K Neudert
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Noll
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Christiane A Melzig
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Rothkopf
- Institute of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Axel Schäfer
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christina V Schmitter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Verena Schuster
- Department of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Stark
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Straube
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Raphaela I Zimmer
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Lukas Kirchner
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trawiński T, Palumbo L, Begum R, Donnelly N. The effect of social factors on eye movements made when judging the aesthetic merit of figurative paintings. Sci Rep 2024; 14:21843. [PMID: 39294260 PMCID: PMC11410938 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72810-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
In the present study we explore how social factors (group contact, individuating experience, implicit racial bias) influence the eye movements made during the visual exploration when judging their aesthetic merit of figurative paintings depicting White and Black sitters. An opportunity sample of participants visiting a gallery in Liverpool viewed ten artworks while their eye movements were recorded and completed a set of individual difference measures. The individual difference measures indicated self-report of art interest, social contact and individuating experience with both Black and White communities, and implicitly held racial bias. The results showed that, despite viewing the paintings for less time, the majority of participants reported paintings showing Black sitters as more interesting, emotionally moving, and pleasurable then those depicting White sitters. However, if a participant reported limited social contact with Black community, and a negative implicit racial bias against them, their rating of aesthetic merit of paintings showing Black sitters was reduced, viewing time increased, and fixations became more focused on faces. The influence of social factors on the viewing of paintings showing White sitters was limited to aesthetic rating. The results are discussed in terms of how social factors influence eye movements when viewing paintings in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobiasz Trawiński
- School of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
| | - Letizia Palumbo
- School of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK
| | - Rabia Begum
- School of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK
| | - Nick Donnelly
- School of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Broda MD, Borovska P, de Haas B. Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades. J Vis 2024; 24:16. [PMID: 38913016 PMCID: PMC11204136 DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.6.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Humans saccade to faces in their periphery faster than to other types of objects. Previous research has highlighted the potential importance of the upper face region in this phenomenon, but it remains unclear whether this is driven by the eye region. Similarly, it remains unclear whether such rapid saccades are exclusive to faces or generalize to other semantically salient stimuli. Furthermore, it is unknown whether individuals differ in their face-specific saccadic reaction times and, if so, whether such differences could be linked to differences in face fixations during free viewing. To explore these open questions, we invited 77 participants to perform a saccadic choice task in which we contrasted faces as well as other salient objects, particularly isolated face features and text, with cars. Additionally, participants freely viewed 700 images of complex natural scenes in a separate session, which allowed us to determine the individual proportion of first fixations falling on faces. For the saccadic choice task, we found advantages for all categories of interest over cars. However, this effect was most pronounced for images of full faces. Full faces also elicited faster saccades compared with eyes, showing that isolated eye regions are not sufficient to elicit face-like responses. Additionally, we found consistent individual differences in saccadic reaction times toward faces that weakly correlated with face salience during free viewing. Our results suggest a link between semantic salience and rapid detection, but underscore the unique status of faces. Further research is needed to resolve the mechanisms underlying rapid face saccades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Davide Broda
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Petra Borovska
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Broda MD, de Haas B. Individual differences in human gaze behavior generalize from faces to objects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2322149121. [PMID: 38470925 PMCID: PMC10963009 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322149121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Individuals differ in where they fixate on a face, with some looking closer to the eyes while others prefer the mouth region. These individual biases are highly robust, generalize from the lab to the outside world, and have been associated with social cognition and associated disorders. However, it is unclear, whether these biases are specific to faces or influenced by domain-general mechanisms of vision. Here, we juxtaposed these hypotheses by testing whether individual face fixation biases generalize to inanimate objects. We analyzed >1.8 million fixations toward faces and objects in complex natural scenes from 405 participants tested in multiple labs. Consistent interindividual differences in fixation positions were highly inter-correlated across faces and objects in all samples. Observers who fixated closer to the eye region also fixated higher on inanimate objects and vice versa. Furthermore, the inter-individual spread of fixation positions scaled with target size in precisely the same, non-linear manner for faces and objects. These findings contradict a purely domain-specific account of individual face gaze. Instead, they suggest significant domain-general contributions to the individual way we look at faces, a finding with potential relevance for basic vision, face perception, social cognition, and associated clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Davide Broda
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen35394, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Universities of Marburg, Giessen, and Darmstadt, Marburg35032, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen35394, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Universities of Marburg, Giessen, and Darmstadt, Marburg35032, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pedziwiatr MA, Heer S, Coutrot A, Bex PJ, Mareschal I. Influence of prior knowledge on eye movements to scenes as revealed by hidden Markov models. J Vis 2023; 23:10. [PMID: 37721772 PMCID: PMC10511023 DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Human visual experience usually provides ample opportunity to accumulate knowledge about events unfolding in the environment. In typical scene perception experiments, however, participants view images that are unrelated to each other and, therefore, they cannot accumulate knowledge relevant to the upcoming visual input. Consequently, the influence of such knowledge on how this input is processed remains underexplored. Here, we investigated this influence in the context of gaze control. We used sequences of static film frames arranged in a way that allowed us to compare eye movements to identical frames between two groups: a group that accumulated prior knowledge relevant to the situations depicted in these frames and a group that did not. We used a machine learning approach based on hidden Markov models fitted to individual scanpaths to demonstrate that the gaze patterns from the two groups differed systematically and, thereby, showed that recently accumulated prior knowledge contributes to gaze control. Next, we leveraged the interpretability of hidden Markov models to characterize these differences. Additionally, we report two unexpected and interesting caveats of our approach. Overall, our results highlight the importance of recently acquired prior knowledge for oculomotor control and the potential of hidden Markov models as a tool for investigating it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek A Pedziwiatr
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sophie Heer
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Antoine Coutrot
- Univ Lyon, CNRS, INSA Lyon, UCBL, LIRIS, UMR5205, F-69621 Lyon, France
| | - Peter J Bex
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isabelle Mareschal
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borovska P, de Haas B. Faces in scenes attract rapid saccades. J Vis 2023; 23:11. [PMID: 37552021 PMCID: PMC10411644 DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.8.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
During natural vision, the human visual system has to process upcoming eye movements in parallel to currently fixated stimuli. Saccades targeting isolated faces are known to have lower latency and higher velocity, but it is unclear how this generalizes to the natural cycle of saccades and fixations during free-viewing of complex scenes. To which degree can the visual system process high-level features of extrafoveal stimuli when they are embedded in visual clutter and compete with concurrent foveal input? Here, we investigated how free-viewing dynamics vary as a function of an upcoming fixation target while controlling for various low-level factors. We found strong evidence that face- versus inanimate object-directed saccades are preceded by shorter fixations and have higher peak velocity. Interestingly, the boundary conditions for these two effects are dissociated. The effect on fixation duration was limited to face saccades, which were small and followed the trajectory of the preceding one, early in a trial. This is reminiscent of a recently proposed model of perisaccadic retinotopic shifts of attention. The effect on saccadic velocity, however, extended to very large saccades and increased with trial duration. These findings suggest that multiple, independent mechanisms interact to process high-level features of extrafoveal targets and modulate the dynamics of natural vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Borovska
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Linka M, Sensoy Ö, Karimpur H, Schwarzer G, de Haas B. Free viewing biases for complex scenes in preschoolers and adults. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11803. [PMID: 37479760 PMCID: PMC10362043 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38854-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult gaze behaviour towards naturalistic scenes is highly biased towards semantic object classes. Little is known about the ontological development of these biases, nor about group-level differences in gaze behaviour between adults and preschoolers. Here, we let preschoolers (n = 34, age 5 years) and adults (n = 42, age 18-59 years) freely view 40 complex scenes containing objects with different semantic attributes to compare their fixation behaviour. Results show that preschool children allocate a significantly smaller proportion of dwell time and first fixations on Text and instead fixate Faces, Touched objects, Hands and Bodies more. A predictive model of object fixations controlling for a range of potential confounds suggests that most of these differences can be explained by drastically reduced text salience in pre-schoolers and that this effect is independent of low-level salience. These findings are in line with a developmental attentional antagonism between text and body parts (touched objects and hands in particular), which resonates with recent findings regarding 'cortical recycling'. We discuss this and other potential mechanisms driving salience differences between children and adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Linka
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany.
| | - Özlem Sensoy
- Department of Developmental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany
| | - Harun Karimpur
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany
| | - Gudrun Schwarzer
- Department of Developmental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Broda MD, Haddad T, de Haas B. Quick, eyes! Isolated upper face regions but not artificial features elicit rapid saccades. J Vis 2023; 23:5. [PMID: 36749582 PMCID: PMC9919614 DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.2.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Human faces elicit faster saccades than objects or animals, resonating with the great importance of faces for our species. The underlying mechanisms are largely unclear. Here, we test two hypotheses based on previous findings. First, ultra-rapid saccades toward faces may not depend on the presence of the whole face, but the upper face region containing the eye region. Second, ultra-rapid saccades toward faces (and possibly face parts) may emerge from our extensive experience with this stimulus and thus extend to glasses and masks - artificial features frequently encountered as part of a face. To test these hypotheses, we asked 43 participants to complete a saccadic choice task, which contrasted images of whole, upper and lower faces, face masks, and glasses with car images. The resulting data confirmed ultra-rapid saccades for isolated upper face regions, but not for artificial facial features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Davide Broda
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Theresa Haddad
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Berlijn AM, Hildebrandt LK, Gamer M. Idiosyncratic viewing patterns of social scenes reflect individual preferences. J Vis 2022; 22:10. [PMID: 36583910 PMCID: PMC9807181 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.13.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In general, humans preferentially look at conspecifics in naturalistic images. However, such group-based effects might conceal systematic individual differences concerning the preference for social information. Here, we investigated to what degree fixations on social features occur consistently within observers and whether this preference generalizes to other measures of social prioritization in the laboratory as well as the real world. Participants carried out a free viewing task, a relevance taps task that required them to actively select image regions that are crucial for understanding a given scene, and they were asked to freely take photographs outside the laboratory that were later classified regarding their social content. We observed stable individual differences in the fixation and active selection of human heads and faces that were correlated across tasks and partly predicted the social content of self-taken photographs. Such relationship was not observed for human bodies indicating that different social elements need to be dissociated. These findings suggest that idiosyncrasies in the visual exploration and interpretation of social features exist and predict real-world behavior. Future studies should further characterize these preferences and elucidate how they shape perception and interpretation of social contexts in healthy participants and patients with mental disorders that affect social functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M Berlijn
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lea K Hildebrandt
- Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Gamer
- Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Broda MD, de Haas B. Individual fixation tendencies in person viewing generalize from images to videos. Iperception 2022; 13:20416695221128844. [PMID: 36353505 PMCID: PMC9638695 DOI: 10.1177/20416695221128844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Fixation behavior toward persons in static scenes varies considerably between individuals. However, it is unclear whether these differences generalize to dynamic stimuli. Here, we examined individual differences in the distribution of gaze across seven person features (i.e. body and face parts) in static and dynamic scenes. Forty-four participants freely viewed 700 complex static scenes followed by eight director-cut videos (28,925 frames). We determined the presence of person features using hand-delineated pixel masks (images) and Deep Neural Networks (videos). Results replicated highly consistent individual differences in fixation tendencies for all person features in static scenes and revealed that these tendencies generalize to videos. Individual fixation behavior for both, images and videos, fell into two anticorrelated clusters representing the tendency to fixate faces versus bodies. These results corroborate a low-dimensional space for individual gaze biases toward persons and show they generalize from images to videos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian D. Broda
- Department of Experimental
Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior
(CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen,
Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Department of Experimental
Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior
(CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Broda MD, de Haas B. Individual differences in looking at persons in scenes. J Vis 2022; 22:9. [PMID: 36342691 PMCID: PMC9652713 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.12.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals freely viewing complex scenes vary in their fixation behavior. The most prominent and reliable dimension of such individual differences is the tendency to fixate faces. However, much less is known about how observers distribute fixations across other body parts of persons in scenes and how individuals may vary in this regard. Here, we aimed to close this gap. We expanded a popular annotated stimulus set (Xu, Jiang, Wang, Kankanhalli, & Zhao, 2014) with 6,365 hand-delineated pixel masks for the body parts of 1,136 persons embedded in 700 complex scenes, which we publish with this article (https://osf.io/ynujz/). This resource allowed us to analyze the person-directed fixations of 103 participants freely viewing these scenes. We found large and reliable individual differences in the distribution of fixations across person features. Individual fixation tendencies formed two anticorrelated clusters, one for the eyes, head, and the inner face and one for body features (torsi, arms, legs, and hands). Interestingly, the tendency to fixate mouths was independent of the face cluster. Finally, our results show that observers who tend to avoid person fixations in general, particularly do so for the face region. These findings underscore the role of individual differences in fixation behavior and reveal underlying dimensions. They are further in line with a recently proposed push-pull relationship between cortical tuning for faces and bodies. They may also aid the comparison of special populations to general variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Davide Broda
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Großekathöfer JD, Seis C, Gamer M. Reality in a sphere: A direct comparison of social attention in the laboratory and the real world. Behav Res Methods 2022; 54:2286-2301. [PMID: 34918223 PMCID: PMC9579106 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01724-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Humans often show reduced social attention in real situations, a finding rarely replicated in controlled laboratory studies. Virtual reality is supposed to allow for ecologically valid and at the same time highly controlled experiments. This study aimed to provide initial insights into the reliability and validity of using spherical videos viewed via a head-mounted display (HMD) to assess social attention. We chose five public places in the city of Würzburg and measured eye movements of 44 participants for 30 s at each location twice: Once in a real environment with mobile eye-tracking glasses and once in a virtual environment playing a spherical video of the location in an HMD with an integrated eye tracker. As hypothesized, participants demonstrated reduced social attention with less exploration of passengers in the real environment as compared to the virtual one. This is in line with earlier studies showing social avoidance in interactive situations. Furthermore, we only observed consistent gaze proportions on passengers across locations in virtual environments. These findings highlight that the potential for social interactions and an adherence to social norms are essential modulators of viewing behavior in social situations and cannot be easily simulated in laboratory contexts. However, spherical videos might be helpful for supplementing the range of methods in social cognition research and other fields. Data and analysis scripts are available at https://osf.io/hktdu/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas D Großekathöfer
- Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Christian Seis
- Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Gamer
- Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Linka M, Broda MD, Alsheimer T, de Haas B, Ramon M. Characteristic fixation biases in Super-Recognizers. J Vis 2022; 22:17. [PMID: 35900724 PMCID: PMC9344214 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.8.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurotypical observers show large and reliable individual differences in gaze behavior along several semantic object dimensions. Individual gaze behavior toward faces has been linked to face identity processing, including that of neurotypical observers. Here, we investigated potential gaze biases in Super-Recognizers (SRs), individuals with exceptional face identity processing skills. Ten SRs, identified with a novel conservative diagnostic framework, and 43 controls freely viewed 700 complex scenes depicting more than 5000 objects. First, we tested whether SRs and controls differ in fixation biases along four semantic dimensions: faces, text, objects being touched, and bodies. Second, we tested potential group differences in fixation biases toward eyes and mouths. Finally, we tested whether SRs fixate closer to the theoretical optimal fixation point for face identification. SRs showed a stronger gaze bias toward faces and away from text and touched objects, starting from the first fixation onward. Further, SRs spent a significantly smaller proportion of first fixations and dwell time toward faces on mouths but did not differ in dwell time or first fixations devoted to eyes. Face fixation of SRs also fell significantly closer to the theoretical optimal fixation point for identification, just below the eyes. Our findings suggest that reliable superiority for face identity processing is accompanied by early fixation biases toward faces and preferred saccadic landing positions close to the theoretical optimum for face identification. We discuss future directions to investigate the functional basis of individual fixation behavior and face identity processing ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Linka
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | | - Tamara Alsheimer
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Applied Face Cognition Lab, University of Lausanne, Institute of Psychology, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Meike Ramon
- Applied Face Cognition Lab, University of Lausanne, Institute of Psychology, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schröder R, Baumert PM, Ettinger U. Replicability and reliability of the background and target velocity effects in smooth pursuit eye movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2021; 219:103364. [PMID: 34245980 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
When we follow a slowly moving target with our eyes, we perform smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM). Previous investigations point to significantly and robustly reduced SPEM performance in the presence of a stationary background and at higher compared to lower target velocities. However, the reliability of these background and target velocity effects has not yet been investigated systematically. To address this issue, 45 healthy participants (17 m, 28 f) took part in two experimental sessions 7 days apart. In each session, participants were instructed to follow a horizontal SPEM target moving sinusoidally between ±7.89° at three different target velocities, corresponding to frequencies of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 Hz. Each target velocity was presented once with and once without a stationary background, resulting in six blocks. The blocks were presented twice per session in order to additionally explore potential task length effects. To assess SPEM performance, velocity gain was calculated as the ratio of eye to target velocity. In line with previous research, detrimental background and target velocity effects were replicated robustly in both sessions with large effect sizes. Good to excellent test-retest reliabilities were obtained at higher target velocities and in the presence of a stationary background, whereas lower reliabilities occurred with slower targets and in the absence of background stimuli. Target velocity and background effects resulted in largely good to excellent reliabilities. These findings not only replicated robust experimental effects of background and target velocity at group level, but also revealed that these effects can be translated into reliable individual difference measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekka Schröder
- Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Ettinger
- Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Studies on colored transparent objects have elucidated potential mechanisms, but these studies have mainly focused on flat filters overlaying flat backgrounds. While they have provided valuable insight, these studies have not captured all aspects of transparency, like caustics, specular reflections/highlights, and shadows. Here, we investigate color-matching experiments with curved transparent objects for different matching stimuli: a uniform patch and a flat filter. Two instructions were tested: simply match the color of the glass object and the test element (patch and flat filter) or match the color of the dye that was used to tint the transparent object (patch). Observers’ matches differed from the mean, the most frequent, and the most saturated color of the transparent stimuli, whereas the brightest regions captured the chromaticity, but not the lightness, of patch matches. We applied four models from flat filter studies: the convergence model, the ratios of either the means (RMC) or standard deviations (RSD) of cone excitations, and a robust ratio model. The original convergence model does not fully generalize but does not perform poorly, and with modifications, we find that curved transparent objects cause a convergence of filtered colors toward a point in color space, similar to flat filters. Considering that, the RMC and robust ratio models generalized more than the RSD, with the RMC performing best across the stimuli we tested. We conclude that the RMC is probably the strongest factor for determining the color. The RSD seems instead to be related to the perceived “clarity” of glass objects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Ennis
- Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen, Department of General Psychology, Giessen, Germany.,
| | - Katja Doerschner
- Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen, Department of General Psychology, Giessen, Germany.,National Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.,
| |
Collapse
|