1
|
Lombardi L, Petoe MA, Moussallem L, Kolic M, Baglin EK, Stefopoulos S, Battiwalla X, Walker JG, Barnes N, Abbott CJ, Allen PJ, for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium. Face and Available Chair Detection and Localization With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2025; 14:11. [PMID: 40338732 PMCID: PMC12068524 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.14.5.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare accuracy of the comprehensive vision processing (VP) algorithm (Lanczos2 [L2]) with the novel VP algorithms, face detection (FaD) and available chair detection (ChD) methods in recipients of the second-generation suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Methods Four suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis recipients (#NCT05158049) were acclimatized to new VP methods (FaD and ChD) with L2 used as control. For face localization, one or two mannequins (white/black) were forward or backward facing in three positions in a room with a white backdrop. Participants were asked to detect the number of mannequins and faces present and point to the forward-facing mannequin. For available chair localization, two mannequins (white/black) were seated in two of three chairs (white/black). Participants were asked to detect and navigate to the available chair. Results FaD performed significantly better than L2 for correct face detection (FaD) (81.25 ± 10.21%; L2 32.81 ± 5.98%; P = 0.029) and for face localization (FaD, 81.25 ± 10.21%; L2, 26.56 ± 10.67%; P = 0.029). The accuracy of mannequin detection was equivalent between FaD (47.22 ± 5.56%) and L2 (52.78 ± 13.98%) with one mannequin (P = 0.457), and with two mannequins present (FaD, 21.43 ± 18.44%; L2. 3.57 ± 7.14%; P = 0.257). The ChD VP method (88.89 ± 12.00% correct) performed significantly better than L2 (19.44 ± 13.22%) for localizing available chairs (P = 0.029). Conclusions FaD and ChD VP methods performed better than L2 for the purpose of localizing faces and available chairs, respectively. Translational Relevance New VP algorithms can improve the localization of specific object types while using the second-generation suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Lombardi
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew A. Petoe
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lauren Moussallem
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K. Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Janine G. Walker
- Health & Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Black Mountain, ACT, Australia
| | - Nick Barnes
- School of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Carla J. Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Penelope J. Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Vitreoretinal Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bionic Vision Technologies Pty Ltd, Docklands, VIC, Australia
- Health & Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Black Mountain, ACT, Australia
- School of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Vitreoretinal Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nouri S, Tehrani AS, Faridani N, Toosi R, Noroozi J, Dehaqani MRA. Microsaccade selectivity as discriminative feature for object decoding. iScience 2025; 28:111584. [PMID: 39811658 PMCID: PMC11731985 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Microsaccades, a form of fixational eye movements, help maintain visual stability during stationary observations. This study examines the modulation of microsaccadic rates by various stimulus categories in monkeys and humans during a passive viewing task. Stimulus sets were grouped into four primary categories: human, animal, natural, and man-made. Distinct post-stimulus microsaccade patterns were identified across these categories, enabling successful decoding of the stimulus category with accuracy and recall of up to 85%. We observed that microsaccade rates are independent of pupil size changes. Neural data showed that category classification in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex peaks earlier than changes in microsaccade rates, suggesting feedback from the IT cortex influences eye movements after stimulus discrimination. These results contribute to neurobiological models, enhance human-machine interfaces, optimize experimental visual stimuli, and deepen understanding of microsaccades' role in object decoding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salar Nouri
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14399-57131, Iran
| | - Amirali Soltani Tehrani
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14399-57131, Iran
| | - Niloufar Faridani
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14399-57131, Iran
| | - Ramin Toosi
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14399-57131, Iran
| | - Jalaledin Noroozi
- School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Reza A. Dehaqani
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14399-57131, Iran
- School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petoe MA, Abbott CJ, Titchener SA, Kolic M, Kentler WG, Nayagam DAX, Baglin EK, Kvansakul J, Barnes N, Walker JG, Karapanos L, McGuinness MB, Ayton LN, Luu CD, Allen PJ. A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial of Feasibility. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2025; 5:100525. [PMID: 39328823 PMCID: PMC11426041 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the feasibility of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis for provision of functional vision in recipients with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) over 2.7 years. Design Prospective, single-arm, unmasked interventional clinical trial. Participants Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision. Methods The 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis was implanted in the worse-seeing eye. Device stability, functionality, and adverse events were investigated at approximately 12-week intervals up to 140 weeks (2.7 years) postdevice activation. Main Outcome Measures Serious adverse event (SAE) reporting, visual response outcomes, functional vision outcomes, and quality-of-life outcomes. Results All 4 participants (aged 39-66 years, 3 males) were successfully implanted in 2018, and there were no device-related SAEs over the duration of the study. A mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage was detected in 2 recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. OCT confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Improvements in localization abilities were demonstrated for all 4 participants in screen-based, tabletop, and orientation and mobility tasks. In addition, 3 of 4 participants recorded improvements in motion discrimination and 2 of 4 participants recorded substantial improvements in spatial discrimination and identification of tabletop objects. Participants reported their unsupervised use of the device included exploring new environments, detecting people, and safely navigating around obstacles. A positive effect of the implant on participants' daily lives in their local environments was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and participant self-report. Emotional well-being was not impacted by device implantation or usage. Conclusions The completed clinical study demonstrates that the suprachoroidal prosthesis raises no safety concerns and provides improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. Financial Disclosures Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Petoe
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carla J Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel A Titchener
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William G Kentler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David A X Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Kvansakul
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Barnes
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Janine G Walker
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Lewis Karapanos
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Myra B McGuinness
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren N Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chi D Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope J Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Vitreoretinal Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Vides L, Hernández-Verdejo JL, Cañadas-Suárez P. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review. J Eye Mov Res 2023; 16:10.16910/jemr.16.3.3. [PMID: 38111688 PMCID: PMC10725735 DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.3.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
This systematic review examines the use of eye-tracking devices in optometry, describing their main characteristics, areas of application and metrics used. Using the PRISMA method, a systematic search was performed of three databases. The search strategy identified 141 reports relevant to this topic, indicating the exponential growth over the past ten years of the use of eye trackers in optometry. Eye-tracking technology was applied in at least 12 areas of the field of optometry and rehabilitation, the main ones being optometric device technology, and the assessment, treatment, and analysis of ocular disorders. The main devices reported on were infrared light-based and had an image capture frequency of 60 Hz to 2000 Hz. The main metrics mentioned were fixations, saccadic movements, smooth pursuit, microsaccades, and pupil variables. Study quality was sometimes limited in that incomplete information was provided regarding the devices used, the study design, the methods used, participants' visual function and statistical treatment of data. While there is still a need for more research in this area, eye-tracking devices should be more actively incorporated as a useful tool with both clinical and research applications. This review highlights the robustness this technology offers to obtain objective information about a person's vision in terms of optometry and visual function, with implications for improving visual health services and our understanding of the vision process.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu KY, Mina M, Sahyoun JY, Kalevar A, Tran SD. Retinal Prostheses: Engineering and Clinical Perspectives for Vision Restoration. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:5782. [PMID: 37447632 PMCID: PMC10347280 DOI: 10.3390/s23135782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
A retinal prosthesis, also known as a bionic eye, is a device that can be implanted to partially restore vision in patients with retinal diseases that have resulted in the loss of photoreceptors (e.g., age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa). Recently, there have been major breakthroughs in retinal prosthesis technology, with the creation of numerous types of implants, including epiretinal, subretinal, and suprachoroidal sensors. These devices can stimulate the remaining cells in the retina with electric signals to create a visual sensation. A literature review of the pre-clinical and clinical studies published between 2017 and 2023 is conducted. This narrative review delves into the retinal anatomy, physiology, pathology, and principles underlying electronic retinal prostheses. Engineering aspects are explored, including electrode-retina alignment, electrode size and material, charge density, resolution limits, spatial selectivity, and bidirectional closed-loop systems. This article also discusses clinical aspects, focusing on safety, adverse events, visual function, outcomes, and the importance of rehabilitation programs. Moreover, there is ongoing debate over whether implantable retinal devices still offer a promising approach for the treatment of retinal diseases, considering the recent emergence of cell-based and gene-based therapies as well as optogenetics. This review compares retinal prostheses with these alternative therapies, providing a balanced perspective on their advantages and limitations. The recent advancements in retinal prosthesis technology are also outlined, emphasizing progress in engineering and the outlook of retinal prostheses. While acknowledging the challenges and complexities of the technology, this article highlights the significant potential of retinal prostheses for vision restoration in individuals with retinal diseases and calls for continued research and development to refine and enhance their performance, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Y. Wu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1G 2E8, Canada; (K.Y.W.)
| | - Mina Mina
- Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Sahyoun
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Ananda Kalevar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1G 2E8, Canada; (K.Y.W.)
| | - Simon D. Tran
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Titchener SA, Goossens J, Kvansakul J, Nayagam DAX, Kolic M, Baglin EK, Ayton LN, Abbott CJ, Luu CD, Barnes N, Kentler WG, Shivdasani MN, Allen PJ, Petoe MA. Estimating Phosphene Locations Using Eye Movements of Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis Users. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023; 12:20. [PMID: 36943168 PMCID: PMC10043502 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accurate mapping of phosphene locations from visual prostheses is vital to encode spatial information. This process may involve the subject pointing to evoked phosphene locations with their finger. Here, we demonstrate phosphene mapping for a retinal implant using eye movements and compare it with retinotopic electrode positions and previous results using conventional finger-based mapping. Methods Three suprachoroidal retinal implant recipients (NCT03406416) indicated the spatial position of phosphenes. Electrodes were stimulated individually, and the subjects moved their finger (finger based) or their eyes (gaze based) to the perceived phosphene location. The distortion of the measured phosphene locations from the expected locations (retinotopic electrode locations) was characterized with Procrustes analysis. Results The finger-based phosphene locations were compressed spatially relative to the expected locations all three subjects, but preserved the general retinotopic arrangement (scale factors ranged from 0.37 to 0.83). In two subjects, the gaze-based phosphene locations were similar to the expected locations (scale factors of 0.72 and 0.99). For the third subject, there was no apparent relationship between gaze-based phosphene locations and electrode locations (scale factor of 0.07). Conclusions Gaze-based phosphene mapping was achievable in two of three tested retinal prosthesis subjects and their derived phosphene maps correlated well with the retinotopic electrode layout. A third subject could not produce a coherent gaze-based phosphene map, but this may have revealed that their phosphenes were indistinct spatially. Translational Relevance Gaze-based phosphene mapping is a viable alternative to conventional finger-based mapping, but may not be suitable for all subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Titchener
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeroen Goossens
- Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc, the Netherlands
| | - Jessica Kvansakul
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David A X Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lauren N Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carla J Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chi D Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nick Barnes
- Data61, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, ACT, Australia
| | - William G Kentler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mohit N Shivdasani
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Penelope J Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew A Petoe
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abbott CJ, Baglin EK, Kolic M, McGuinness MB, Titchener SA, Young KA, Yeoh J, Luu CD, Ayton LN, Petoe MA, Allen PJ. Interobserver Agreement of Electrode to Retina Distance Measurements in a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11:4. [PMID: 36066322 PMCID: PMC9463715 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.9.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The electrode to retina (ER) distance is an important contributory factor to the safety and efficacy of a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Measuring ER distance may be performed by different observers during multisite studies. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement in measuring ER distance. Methods Three independent, trained observers measured ER distance from the center of each suprachoroidal electrode to the inner retinal pigment epithelium in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) B-scans. A total of 121 ER distance measurements from 77 B-scans collected over 5 months from one subject implanted with a second-generation 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (NCT03406416) were made by each observer. Results ER distance ranged from 208 to 509 µm. Pearson's correlation coefficient (ρ) showed agreement of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98–0.99) in measuring ER for each pairwise comparison. The mean difference in ER distance between observers ranged from 2.4 to 6.4 µm with pairwise limits of agreement (95% CI) of ±20 µm (5.5% of mean). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed agreement of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.97–0.99) between observers. Conclusions There is high agreement in measuring ER distances for suprachoroidal retinal prostheses using our systematic approach between multiple, trained observers, supporting the use of a single observer for each image. Translational Relevance High interobserver agreement outcomes indicate that multiple, trained observers can be used to take ER measurements across different images in suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis studies. This improves multisite study efficiency and gives confidence in interpreting results relating to the safety and efficacy of suprachoroidal retinal prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla J Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Myra B McGuinness
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel A Titchener
- Bionics Institute of Australia, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kiera A Young
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Yeoh
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chi D Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren N Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew A Petoe
- Bionics Institute of Australia, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope J Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang J, Zhao R, Li P, Fang Z, Li Q, Han Y, Zhou R, Zhang Y. Clinical Progress and Optimization of Information Processing in Artificial Visual Prostheses. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:6544. [PMID: 36081002 PMCID: PMC9460383 DOI: 10.3390/s22176544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Visual prostheses, used to assist in restoring functional vision to the visually impaired, convert captured external images into corresponding electrical stimulation patterns that are stimulated by implanted microelectrodes to induce phosphenes and eventually visual perception. Detecting and providing useful visual information to the prosthesis wearer under limited artificial vision has been an important concern in the field of visual prosthesis. Along with the development of prosthetic device design and stimulus encoding methods, researchers have explored the possibility of the application of computer vision by simulating visual perception under prosthetic vision. Effective image processing in computer vision is performed to optimize artificial visual information and improve the ability to restore various important visual functions in implant recipients, allowing them to better achieve their daily demands. This paper first reviews the recent clinical implantation of different types of visual prostheses, summarizes the artificial visual perception of implant recipients, and especially focuses on its irregularities, such as dropout and distorted phosphenes. Then, the important aspects of computer vision in the optimization of visual information processing are reviewed, and the possibilities and shortcomings of these solutions are discussed. Ultimately, the development direction and emphasis issues for improving the performance of visual prosthesis devices are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
- Key Laboratory of Fishery Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 200335, China
| | - Rongfeng Zhao
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Peitong Li
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Zhiqiang Fang
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Qianqian Li
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Yanling Han
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Ruyan Zhou
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Titchener SA, Nayagam DAX, Kvansakul J, Kolic M, Baglin EK, Abbott CJ, McGuinness MB, Ayton LN, Luu CD, Greenstein S, Kentler WG, Shivdasani MN, Allen PJ, Petoe MA. A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11:12. [PMID: 35696133 PMCID: PMC9202334 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Methods Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode–retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Results Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode–retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode–retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode–retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Conclusions Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode–retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Translational Relevance Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Titchener
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David A X Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Kvansakul
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carla J Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Myra B McGuinness
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren N Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chi D Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Greenstein
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William G Kentler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mohit N Shivdasani
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Penelope J Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew A Petoe
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karapanos L, Abbott CJ, Ayton LN, Kolic M, McGuinness MB, Baglin EK, Titchener SA, Kvansakul J, Johnson D, Kentler WG, Barnes N, Nayagam DAX, Allen PJ, Petoe MA. Functional Vision in the Real-World Environment With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10:7. [PMID: 34383875 PMCID: PMC8362639 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.10.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In a clinical trial (NCT03406416) of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis implanted in subjects with late-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP), we assessed performance in real-world functional visual tasks and emotional well-being. Methods The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) and Impact of Vision Impairment-Very Low Vision (IVI-VLV) instruments were administered to four subjects before implantation and after device fitting. The FLORA contains 13 self-reported and 35 observer-reported items ranked for ease of conducting task (impossible-easy, central tendency given as mode). The IVI-VLV instrument quantified the impact of low vision on daily activities and emotional well-being. Results Three subjects completed the FLORA for two years after device fitting; the fourth subject ceased participation in the FLORA after fitting for reasons unrelated to the device. For all subjects at each post-fitting visit, the mode ease of task with device ON was better or equal to device OFF. Ease of task improved over the first six months with device ON, then remained stable. Subjects reported improvements in mobility, functional vision, and quality of life with device ON. The IVI-VLV suggested self-assessed vision-related quality of life was not impacted by device implantation or usage. Conclusions Subjects demonstrated sustained improved ease of task scores with device ON compared to OFF, indicating the device has a positive impact in the real-world setting. Translational Relevance Our suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis shows potential utility in everyday life, by enabling an increased environmental awareness and improving access to sensory information for people with end-stage RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewis Karapanos
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carla J. Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lauren N. Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Myra B. McGuinness
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K. Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samuel A. Titchener
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica Kvansakul
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean Johnson
- Specialised Orientation and Mobility, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William G. Kentler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Nick Barnes
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - David A. X. Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Penelope J. Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew A. Petoe
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petoe MA, Titchener SA, Kolic M, Kentler WG, Abbott CJ, Nayagam DAX, Baglin EK, Kvansakul J, Barnes N, Walker JG, Epp SB, Young KA, Ayton LN, Luu CD, Allen PJ. A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10:12. [PMID: 34581770 PMCID: PMC8479573 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.10.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. Methods Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416). A 44-channel electrode array was implanted in a suprachoroidal pocket. Device stability, efficacy, and adverse events were investigated at 12-week intervals. Results All four subjects were implanted successfully and there were no device-related serious adverse events. Color fundus photography indicated a mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage in two recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. Optical coherence tomography confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Screen-based localization accuracy was significantly better for all subjects with device on versus device off. Two subjects were significantly better with the device on in a motion discrimination task at 7, 15, and 30°/s and in a spatial discrimination task at 0.033 cycles per degree. All subjects were more accurate with the device on than device off at walking toward a target on a modified door task, localizing and touching tabletop objects, and detecting obstacles in an obstacle avoidance task. A positive effect of the implant on subjects' daily lives was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and subject self-report. Conclusions These interim study data demonstrate that the suprachoroidal prosthesis is safe and provides significant improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. Translational Relevance A suprachoroidal prosthesis can provide clinically useful artificial vision while maintaining a safe surgical profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Petoe
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel A Titchener
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Kolic
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William G Kentler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carla J Abbott
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David A X Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Baglin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Kvansakul
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Barnes
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Janine G Walker
- Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | - Kiera A Young
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren N Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chi D Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope J Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Full gaze contingency provides better reading performance than head steering alone in a simulation of prosthetic vision. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11121. [PMID: 34045485 PMCID: PMC8160142 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86996-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The visual pathway is retinotopically organized and sensitive to gaze position, leading us to hypothesize that subjects using visual prostheses incorporating eye position would perform better on perceptual tasks than with devices that are merely head-steered. We had sighted subjects read sentences from the MNREAD corpus through a simulation of artificial vision under conditions of full gaze compensation, and head-steered viewing. With 2000 simulated phosphenes, subjects (n = 23) were immediately able to read under full gaze compensation and were assessed at an equivalent visual acuity of 1.0 logMAR, but were nearly unable to perform the task under head-steered viewing. At the largest font size tested, 1.4 logMAR, subjects read at 59 WPM (50% of normal speed) with 100% accuracy under the full-gaze condition, but at 0.7 WPM (under 1% of normal) with below 15% accuracy under head-steering. We conclude that gaze-compensated prostheses are likely to produce considerably better patient outcomes than those not incorporating eye movements.
Collapse
|
13
|
Moleirinho S, Whalen AJ, Fried SI, Pezaris JS. The impact of synchronous versus asynchronous electrical stimulation in artificial vision. J Neural Eng 2021; 18:10.1088/1741-2552/abecf1. [PMID: 33900206 PMCID: PMC11565581 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abecf1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Visual prosthesis devices designed to restore sight to the blind have been under development in the laboratory for several decades. Clinical translation continues to be challenging, due in part to gaps in our understanding of critical parameters such as how phosphenes, the electrically-generated pixels of artificial vision, can be combined to form images. In this review we explore the effects that synchronous and asynchronous electrical stimulation across multiple electrodes have in evoking phosphenes. Understanding how electrical patterns influence phosphene generation to control object binding and perception of visual form is fundamental to creation of a clinically successful prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Moleirinho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Whalen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Shelley I Fried
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, United States of America
- Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - John S Pezaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abbasi B, Rizzo JF. Advances in Neuroscience, Not Devices, Will Determine the Effectiveness of Visual Prostheses. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; 36:168-175. [PMID: 33734937 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1887902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Background: Innovations in engineering and neuroscience have enabled the development of sophisticated visual prosthetic devices. In clinical trials, these devices have provided visual acuities as high as 20/460, enabled coarse navigation, and even allowed for reading of short words. However, long-term commercial viability arguably rests on attaining even better vision and more definitive improvements in tasks of daily living and quality of life. Purpose: Here we review technological and biological obstacles in the implementation of visual prosthetics. Conclusions: Research in the visual prosthetic field has tackled significant technical challenges, including biocompatibility, signal spread through neural tissue, and inadvertent activation of passing axons; however, significant gaps in knowledge remain in the realm of neuroscience, including the neural code of vision and visual plasticity. We assert that further optimization of prosthetic devices alone will not provide markedly improved visual outcomes without significant advances in our understanding of neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bardia Abbasi
- Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph F Rizzo
- Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|