1
|
Peer Y, Koren A. Facilitators and barriers for implementing the integrated behavioural health care model in the USA: An integrative review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2022; 31:1300-1314. [PMID: 35637556 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The integrated behavioural health care (IBHC) model incorporates mental health services with primary care. This service model is widely advocated due to its increasing access to health care and cost-saving. By connecting individuals with mental illnesses with a primary care provider, this model of care promotes collaboration between interdisciplinary teams, and therefore, increases health equity, decreases stigma, and increases patient satisfaction. This integrative review aimed to examine and synthesize available literature on facilitators and barriers related to the IBHC model implementation in the United States. An integrative review methodology by Whittemore and Knafl was utilized, and data evaluation was based on the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The social-ecological model guided the review. Twenty-two articles were analysed, and nine themes were identified, which were further organized according to the five levels of the social-ecological model and consisted of intrapersonal level - patient-centered care; interpersonal level - relationships; community level - physical accessibility; organizational level - operation and infrastructure, team approach, training in behavioural health, electronic medical record, and staffing; and policy level - funds and health insurance. Most facilitating factors were on the organizational level and related to infrastructure, team approach, patient-centered care, and the most noted barrier was poor relationships. Nurses can increase engagement in integrated care by assuming roles that oversee patient care, foster professional collaborations, and improve relationships. Future research should focus on vulnerable populations this model serves, patients' perspectives, and the effect of telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifat Peer
- Susan and Alan Solomont School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts - Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ainat Koren
- Susan and Alan Solomont School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts - Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Collins DE, Luther L, Raugh IM, Condray R, Allen DN, Strauss GP. The Role of Disability Benefits as an Environmental Factor Contributing to Negative Symptoms. Schizophr Bull 2022; 49:1-4. [PMID: 35808961 PMCID: PMC9810000 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren Luther
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Ian M Raugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Ruth Condray
- Biometrics Research Program, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel N Allen
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Gregory P Strauss
- To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, 125 Baldwin St., Athens, GA 30602; tel: +1-706-542-0307, fax: +1-706-542-3275,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson JL, Holloway K, Karyczak S, Serody MR, Lane IA, Ellison ML, Gill KJ, Davis M, Mullen MG. Evaluating Educational and Employment Services for Young People With Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:787-800. [PMID: 34875848 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating vocational interventions for young people with psychiatric conditions to determine the extent to which services were adapted for young people and whether services promoted gains in postsecondary education and employment. METHODS Five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, and ERIC) were searched. Sources eligible for inclusion were controlled studies published between 2000 and mid-2020 that evaluated a vocational intervention and examined postsecondary educational or employment outcomes for youths or young adults (ages 14-35 years) with psychiatric conditions. RESULTS Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Several of the studies evaluated services that were adapted for young people, including through the incorporation of educational supports. The most consistent finding was that services based on the individual placement and support (IPS) model improved employment outcomes more effectively than did comparison approaches and treatment as usual. Fewer studies assessed educational outcomes, and they yielded mixed results; however, recent findings from a controlled trial indicate that an enhanced IPS intervention that included well-specified supported education and skills training led to significantly superior outcomes in both education and employment. CONCLUSIONS These results provide support for the efficacy of IPS-based services to improve employment outcomes among young people with psychiatric conditions and suggest that adapting IPS to include comprehensive educational supports and skills training may be important for efforts to improve postsecondary educational outcomes. Additional well-controlled intervention studies that examine educational and longer-term outcomes should further inform the development and delivery of vocational services for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy L Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Katherine Holloway
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Sean Karyczak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Megan R Serody
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Ian A Lane
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Marsha L Ellison
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Kenneth J Gill
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Maryann Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| | - Michelle G Mullen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Thompson, Serody); Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Thompson, Holloway, Karyczak, Gill); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Lane, Ellison, Davis, Mullen)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foley SM, Haines K, Mock L. Phase I development of the SGA Model: Use of administrative data and expert opinion to identify key components of the SGA Model. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION 2020. [DOI: 10.3233/jvr-201103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The SGA Model Demonstration tested a coordinated team approach that integrated specific components of vocational rehabilitation services to determine if the model would increase earnings outcomes of Social Security Disability income beneficiaries who sought VR services in Kentucky and Minnesota. OBJECTIVE: This paper provides details on the first phase of development of the SGA intervention. METHODS: Researchers combined a Delphi process, key informant interviews, and administrative data review to identify practices that were high priority for inclusion in the model. RESULTS: Researchers reached a consensus on the high priority components to construct a testable intervention under the control of the vocational rehabilitation system. CONCLUSIONS: The SGA Project team identified three practice domains to guide an intensive case study for Phase II development of the intervention. These included pacing of services, work incentives counseling, and strategies for employment service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Foley
- Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly Haines
- Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda Mock
- Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weaver DA. Social Security Disability Benefits: Characteristics of the Approved and Denied Populations. JOURNAL OF DISABILITY POLICY STUDIES 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/1044207320933538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Using new data from the 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation, I estimate that about 24 million individuals between the ages of 18 and 66 years have applied for Social Security disability benefits at some point in their lives. This population is about evenly divided among those who have ever received benefits from the program (beneficiaries) and those who have been denied. Those who have been denied benefits have only somewhat more favorable health circumstances than beneficiaries. Furthermore, relative to the general working age population, I find that the denied group has a high rate of poor health, high levels of poverty, and limited earnings. I also examine subpopulations of the denied group, finding that those who have been denied Social Security but who have received Supplemental Security Income disability face less favorable circumstances and those who have been denied Social Security but who have received Veterans Affairs, Workers Compensation, or private disability benefits have more favorable circumstances. Currently, no federal program or policy specifically targets work, health, or poverty outcomes of the denied Social Security population. Possible initiatives to improve outcomes, however, would need to take into account the underlying health conditions and work capacity of the population documented in this study.
Collapse
|
6
|
Impacting Entry into Evidence-Based Supported Employment: A Population-Based Empirical Analysis of a Statewide Public Mental Health Program in Maryland. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2017; 45:328-341. [DOI: 10.1007/s10488-017-0827-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
7
|
Morgan VA, Waterreus A, Carr V, Castle D, Cohen M, Harvey C, Galletly C, Mackinnon A, McGorry P, McGrath JJ, Neil AL, Saw S, Badcock JC, Foley DL, Waghorn G, Coker S, Jablensky A. Responding to challenges for people with psychotic illness: Updated evidence from the Survey of High Impact Psychosis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017; 51:124-140. [PMID: 27913580 DOI: 10.1177/0004867416679738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective is to summarise recent findings from the 2010 Australian Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) and examine their implications for future policy and planning to improve mental health, physical health and other circumstances of people with a psychotic disorder. METHODS Survey of High Impact Psychosis collected nationally representative data on 1825 people with psychotic illness. Over 60 papers have been published covering key challenges reported by participants: financial problems, loneliness and social isolation, unemployment, poor physical health, uncontrolled symptoms of mental illness, and lack of stable, suitable housing. Findings are summarised under the rubric of participant-ranked top challenges. RESULTS The main income source for the majority (85%) of participants was a government benefit. Only one-third was employed, and the most appropriate employment services for this group were under-utilised. High rates of loneliness and social isolation impacted mental and physical health. The rate of cardiometabolic disease was well above the general population rate, and associated risk factors were present from a very young age. Childhood abuse (30.6%), adult violent victimisation (16.4%) and alcohol and substance abuse/dependence (lifetime rates of 50.5% and 54.5%, respectively) complicated the clinical profile. Treatment with medication was suboptimal, with physical health conditions undertreated, a high rate of psychotropic polypharmacy and underutilisation of clozapine in chronic persistent psychotic illness. Only 38.6% received evidence-based psychosocial therapies. In the previous year, 27.4% had changed housing and 12.8% had been homeless, on average for 155 days. CONCLUSION Money, social engagement and employment are the most important challenges for people with psychotic illness, as well as good physical and mental health. An integrated approach to recovery is needed to optimise service delivery and augment evidence-based clinical practice with measures to improve physical health and social circumstances. Meeting these challenges has the potential to reduce costs to government and society, as well as promote recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera A Morgan
- 1 Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.,2 Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Anna Waterreus
- 1 Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Vaughan Carr
- 3 Research Unit for Schizophrenia Epidemiology, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,4 Schizophrenia Research Institute and Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,5 Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Castle
- 6 St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,7 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin Cohen
- 8 Hunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,9 The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Carol Harvey
- 7 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cherrie Galletly
- 10 Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,11 Ramsay Health Care, Mental Health Services, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,12 Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- 13 Black Dog Institute and University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia.,14 Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Patrick McGorry
- 15 Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John J McGrath
- 16 Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,17 Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amanda L Neil
- 18 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Suzy Saw
- 19 Health Data Analysis Pty Ltd, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Johanna C Badcock
- 2 Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.,20 Cooperative Research Centre-Mental Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Debra L Foley
- 21 Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Geoff Waghorn
- 17 Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah Coker
- 22 SANE Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Assen Jablensky
- 2 Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.,20 Cooperative Research Centre-Mental Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|