1
|
Tang V, Montemayor BN, Owens C. Factors Influencing Oral Pre-, Post-, and Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Among Substance-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Rural Southern US. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2025. [PMID: 40323716 DOI: 10.1089/apc.2025.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Substance-using men who have sex with men (MSM), especially those in rural areas, face a heightened risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Despite increased risk, uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) remains low among rural MSM. The multi-domain factors influencing past-year use of oral PrEP, PEP, and Doxy-PEP among substance-using MSM in the rural southern US remain unknown. A cross-sectional study of rural substance-using MSM (n = 345) in the Southern US was conducted from February 29 to March 23, 2024. Three series of bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Past-year PrEP use was significantly associated with HIV-negative status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.80, p = 0.025), past-year STI diagnosis (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.19-4.15, p = 0.012), past-year HIV testing (aOR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.05-10.9, p = 0.040), and past-year STI testing (aOR = 10.09, 95% CI: 2.25-45.37, p = 0.003). Past-year PEP use was significantly associated with past-year STI diagnosis (aOR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.33-10.32, p = 0.012) and oral sex (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.63, p = 0.015). Finally, past-year Doxy-PEP use was significantly associated with past year-STI diagnosis (aOR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.03-9.71, p < 0.001). Results underscore the need for integrated care across primary care, pharmacy, and substance use treatment settings to improve screening, education, and prescription of HIV/STI preventative biomedical pharmaceuticals for substance-using MSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinh Tang
- Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin N Montemayor
- Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Center for Health Equity and Evaluation Research, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Owens
- Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Center for Health Equity and Evaluation Research, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bunting SR, Vidyasagar N, Wilson AP, Hazra A. Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention at Outpatient Substance Use Treatment Facilities, United States, 2021. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:833-837. [PMID: 38815231 PMCID: PMC11224638 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2024.307699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Objectives. To determine the percentage of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities that offer HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods. We used a retrospective cross-sectional design with data from the National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey, which was administered to directors of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities in 2021. We evaluated the percentage of outpatient substance use treatment facilities offering PrEP and factors associated with the likelihood of offering PrEP. Results. We included 12 182 outpatient substance use treatment facilities. Of these, 637 (5.2%) offered PrEP. Offering HIV treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 45.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.0, 56.9) and offering programs for LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning) people (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.6) were associated with higher likelihoods of offering PrEP. Conclusions. PrEP is highly effective and recommended for patients at risk for HIV from injection drug use. Nearly 95% of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities did not offer PrEP-a missed opportunity for harm reduction through primary HIV prevention. Public Health Implications. Diversification of the array of available HIV PrEP options and the ongoing HIV and opioid use epidemics require outpatient substance use treatment facilities to expand PrEP availability. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(8):833-837. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307699).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R Bunting
- Samuel Bunting is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Nitin Vidyasagar is with the Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Allison Wilson and Aniruddha Hazra are with the Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago. Aniruddha Hazra is also with the Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
| | - Nitin Vidyasagar
- Samuel Bunting is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Nitin Vidyasagar is with the Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Allison Wilson and Aniruddha Hazra are with the Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago. Aniruddha Hazra is also with the Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
| | - Allison P Wilson
- Samuel Bunting is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Nitin Vidyasagar is with the Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Allison Wilson and Aniruddha Hazra are with the Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago. Aniruddha Hazra is also with the Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
| | - Aniruddha Hazra
- Samuel Bunting is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Nitin Vidyasagar is with the Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Allison Wilson and Aniruddha Hazra are with the Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago. Aniruddha Hazra is also with the Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sokale I, Wilkerson J, Wermuth P, Atem F, Burnett J, Wejnert C, Khuwaja S, Troisi C. Past-Year HIV Testing, Current Antiretroviral Therapy Use, and Participation in Services for People Who Inject Drugs. AIDS Behav 2024; 28:2793-2803. [PMID: 38822083 PMCID: PMC11492141 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04369-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
Evaluating routine HIV testing and treatment and use of services for people who inject drugs (PWID) is critical to curb the ongoing HIV epidemic. We analyzed data from the 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance of PWID aged 18 years or older, recruited using respondent-driven sampling and offered anonymous HIV testing after survey. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses with log-linked Poisson regression of the generalized linear models to examine the associations between demographics and PWID service use, past-year HIV testing, and current antiretroviral therapy (ART) use. Among 10,311 HIV-negative PWID, 56% reported past-year HIV testing, and of the 553 HIV-positive PWID, 69% reported current ART use. Of the HIV-negative PWID, 64% (2874/4482) in drug treatment and 62% (3386/5440) who used syringe service programs (SSPs) reported past-year HIV testing. Among HIV-positive PWID, 75% (187/248) in drug treatment and 67% (200/298) SSP participants were on ART. In the adjusted multivariable model, past-year HIV testing was associated with drug use treatment (aPR 1.26, 95% CI 1.23-1.31) and SSP participation (aPR 1.19, 95% CI 1.13-1.26) among HIV-negative PWID. Current ART use was associated with drug use treatment (aPR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.28) but the link was not significant probably due to small sample size. Findings support the expansion and improvement of PWID-targeted services, into comprehensive programs, including drug use treatment, SSP, and HIV testing and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itunu Sokale
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Room RAS E927, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Johnny Wilkerson
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paige Wermuth
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Room RAS E927, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Folefac Atem
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janet Burnett
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cyprian Wejnert
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Salma Khuwaja
- Disease Prevention and Control Division, Houston Health Department, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine Troisi
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Room RAS E927, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bunting SR, Wang G, Yu R, Hazra A. Availability of Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV in U.S. Outpatient Mental Healthcare Settings. AIDS Behav 2024; 28:1029-1038. [PMID: 37882953 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-04211-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
People with mental illnesses experience higher incidence of sexually transmitted illnesses (STIs) and HIV, and estimates show fewer than 50% have received testing. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of STI/HIV testing among United States outpatient mental healthcare service providers. Data from the National Mental Health Services Survey (NMHSS) was used to determine the rates of STI and HIV testing amongst 9,267 outpatient mental healthcare service providers in the U.S. Regression analyses were used to assess whether the likelihood a service provider offered STI or HIV testing was associated with service provider characteristics (facility type, services offered, accepted payments) and state-level incidence of STIs and HIV. We found 7.79% and 6.64% of outpatient mental healthcare service providers provided STI and HIV testing, respectively, with lowest rates in community mental health centers and partial hospitalization facilities. Providing dual-diagnosis for severe mental illness and substance use disorders was an independent predictor of STI testing (aOR = 2.17, [1.72-2.75] and HIV testing (aOR = 2.61, [2.07-3.30]. Higher state-level incidence of STIs and HIV were associated with higher rates of STI testing (β = 0.28, p = .047) and HIV testing (β = 0.48, p < .001). Preventing STIs and HIV among patients living with mental illness is a key priority of multiple national initiatives. Despite this, fewer than 10% of outpatient mental healthcare service providers responding to the NMHSS offered STI and HIV testing. Existing service co-delivery models may be one promising method for implementing STI/HIV testing within outpatient mental health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R Bunting
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Gary Wang
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roger Yu
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aniruddha Hazra
- Section of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomas MD, Vittinghoff E, Koester KA, Dahiya P, Riano NS, Cournos F, Dawson L, Olfson M, Pinals DA, Crystal S, Walkup J, Shade S, Mangurian C, Arnold EA. Examining the Impact of State-Level Factors on HIV Testing for Medicaid Enrollees With Schizophrenia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2023; 94:18-27. [PMID: 37229531 PMCID: PMC10524352 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with schizophrenia experience unique barriers to routine HIV testing, despite increased risk of HIV compared with the general US population. Little is known about how health care delivery system factors affect testing rates or whether there are testing differences for people with schizophrenia. SETTING Nationally representative sample of Medicaid enrollees with and without schizophrenia. METHODS Using retrospective longitudinal data, we examined whether state-level factors were associated with differences in HIV testing among Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia compared with frequency-matched controls during 2002-2012. Multivariable logistic regression estimated testing rate differences between and within cohorts. RESULTS Higher HIV testing rates for enrollees with schizophrenia were associated with higher state-level Medicaid spending per enrollee, efforts to reduce Medicaid fragmentation, and higher federal prevention funding. State-level AIDS epidemiology predicted more frequent HIV testing for enrollees with schizophrenia versus controls. Living in rural settings predicted lower HIV testing, especially for people with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION Overall, state-level predictors of HIV testing rates varied among Medicaid enrollees, although rates were generally higher for those with schizophrenia than controls. Increased HIV testing for people with schizophrenia was associated with coverage of HIV testing when medically necessary, higher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention prevention funding, and higher AIDS incidence, prevalence, and mortality when compared with controls. This analysis suggests that state policymaking has an important role to play in advancing that effort. Overcoming fragmented care systems, sustaining robust prevention funding, and consolidating funding streams in innovative and flexible ways to support more comprehensive systems of care delivery deserve attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn D. Thomas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 550 16th St 2 floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 675 18th St, San Francisco, CA 94107
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 550 16th St 2 floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Kimberly A. Koester
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143
| | - Priya Dahiya
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 675 18th St, San Francisco, CA 94107
| | - Nicholas S. Riano
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 675 18th St, San Francisco, CA 94107
- Department of Psychological Science, School of Social Ecology, University of California Irvine, 2220 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, 214 Pereira Dr, Irvine, CA 92617
| | - Francine Cournos
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032
| | - Lindsey Dawson
- KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) 185 Berry St #2000, San Francisco, CA 94107
| | - Mark Olfson
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032
- New York State Psychiatric Institute 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032
| | - Debra A. Pinals
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Steven Crystal
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - James Walkup
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University 152 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854
| | - Starley Shade
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 550 16th St 2 floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Christina Mangurian
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 550 16th St 2 floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 675 18th St, San Francisco, CA 94107
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital 2789 25th St, San Francisco, CA 94110
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco 490 Illinois Street 7 Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Emily A. Arnold
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco 550 16th St 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA 94158
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ware OD, Srivastava A, Masa R, Baca-Atlas SN, Chowa G. HIV Prevention Services in Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities in the United States. AIDS EDUCATION AND PREVENTION : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AIDS EDUCATION 2023; 35:173-183. [PMID: 37129590 DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2023.35.2.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Residential substance use disorder treatment is designed to treat more severe substance use disorders. Considering the strong association between substance use and HIV, providing HIV prevention services during residential substance use disorder treatment is imperative. However, not all treatment facilities offer the same services, and differences in residential substance use disorder treatment facilities providing HIV prevention services might stem from facility-level characteristics. Using 3 years (2018-2020) of cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services, we examined which treatment facility characteristics were associated with having HIV prevention services. Using a logistic regression model with HIV prevention services as the outcome, we found that facilities that were accredited, engaged in community outreach, and offered assistance with housing and transportation were more likely to provide HIV prevention services. Furthermore, facilities in the Midwest and West were less likely to provide HIV prevention services than those in the South.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orrin D Ware
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ankur Srivastava
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rainier Masa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stefani N Baca-Atlas
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gina Chowa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fujita AW, Wilson JD, Kennedy AJ. A Call to Action: Integration of Buprenorphine Prescribing into the Care of Persons with HIV and Opioid Use Disorder. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac400. [PMID: 36039099 PMCID: PMC9384664 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we also experienced a worsening opioid overdose epidemic. Untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with worse HIV-related outcomes. Buprenorphine is a safe, evidence-based medication for OUD and is effective in reducing opioid craving and overdose and improving outcomes along the HIV care continuum. Despite the longstanding evidence supporting the benefits of buprenorphine, there remains an implementation gap in the uptake of buprenorphine prescribing in HIV care settings. To improve integration of OUD care and HIV primary care, we recommend (1) all HIV clinicians obtain a buprenorphine waiver, (2) teaching on OUD should be integrated into infectious diseases and HIV continuing medical education, and (3) previously validated models of integrated care should be leveraged to urgently expand access to buprenorphine for persons with HIV and OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wendy Fujita
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University Department of Medicine , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - J Deanna Wilson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA , USA
| | - Amy J Kennedy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA , USA
| |
Collapse
|