A naturalistic outcome study of risperidone treatment among hospital patients

A naturalistic study of risperidone treatment in seven affiliated university hospitals in Korea

This retrospective naturalistic study, conducted on patients with schizophrenia, was undertaken to examine the differences in the clinical characteristics of subjects who were treated with risperidone, but who were discontinued soon after administration, and those who were maintained on the drug for a long-term period. Data on 210 of 580 inpatients with schizophrenia who were treated with risperidone and whose complete medical records were available, were analyzed. Patients maintained on risperidone for at least 2 years were assigned to a 'long-term maintenance' (LTM) group and those who were discontinued within 6 months of risperidone administration were assigned to an 'early drop-out' (ED) group. The parameters used for comparisons included the patients' demographic characteristics, the presence/absence of physical or psychiatric comorbidities, the severity of the psychopathology, the typology of the schizophrenia, the nature and subjects' responses to previous antipsychotic treatments (if any) and dosages of risperidone treatment. Of the 210 subjects, 67 (31.9%) belonged to the ED group, whereas 143 (68.1%) were maintained on risperidone at 2 years. There were no significant differences in the demographics, nor in the severity of the psychopathology, nor were there significant differences in the starting or maximal dosages of risperidone administered between the two groups. Exposure to any previous antipsychotic and the longest maintained final dosage of risperidone were significantly different in the two groups. We believed that a multicenter-based retrospective naturalistic study would provide useful information about the efficacy and other practical aspects of antipsychotic administration.

Would a switch from typical antipsychotics to risperidone be beneficial for elderly schizophrenic patients? A naturalistic, long-term, retrospective, comparative study

Elderly chronic schizophrenia patients are particularly difficult to treat because of aging-related changes, cognitive impairment, and comorbid physical illness. This article describes a naturalistic, retrospective study of typical antipsychotic treatment versus risperidone for elderly psychotic inpatients. Fifty-one patients, mean age 72.7 + 5.9 years, mean disease duration 33.1 + 12.0 years, who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were treated by risperidone (n = 26) or typical antipsychotic treatment (n = 25) during acute exacerbation and followed up for 18 months. Patients were rated using the clinical global impression (CGI) scale and positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS), and their body weight was recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Both treatment groups improved on all rating scales at 18 months. Levels of decrease in PANSS positive and total scores were more prominent in patients treated with risperidone (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). The change in CGI scores reached significance only after 18 months and was more pronounced in the risperidone group (p < 0.01). Anti-Parkinsonian medications were used more frequently in the typical antipsychotic group, whereas benzodiazepines were used more frequently in the risperidone group. Body mass index increased minimally after 18 months in the risperidone group (+ 0.3 kg/m2), whereas a larger (+ 1.1 kg/m2), albeit not statistically significant, increase was recorded in the typical antipsychotic group. Emergence of side effects was less frequent in patients treated with risperidone (4/26 vs. 16/25 patients, p < 0.01). The results of this study demonstrate that in elderly chronic schizophrenic patients, switching from typical antipsychotics to risperidone is effective and well tolerated.

Novel antipsychotics and patient care in state hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To review and highlight the opportunities and challenges of pharmacologic advances in the use of antipsychotics for the state hospital system.

METHODS

A critical review was performed of studies published either as articles or abstracts, on the use of novel antipsychotics, particularly as they relate to the patient population within the state mental hospital system.

FINDINGS

The recent availability of new antipsychotic medications within state facilities has resulted in more progressive treatment, reduced recidivism (and consequently cost savings), and preliminary evidence of preferential and superior treatment response in specific patient subgroups (e.g., those with aggression). At the same time, inpatient pharmacy budget increases and uncertainty in guiding the use of novel antipsychotics have influenced the availability of these agents in state hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

State hospital services have, by and large, embraced the developments in pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Optimal use of these new agents in this population requires additional information on their relative efficacy in specific patient subgroups.