Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, carrying a significant socioeconomic burden. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with 4 major subtypes identified. Each subtype has unique prognostic factors, risks, treatment responses, and survival rates. Advances in targeted therapies have considerably improved the 5-year survival rates for primary breast cancer patients largely due to widespread screening programs that enable early detection and timely treatment. Imaging techniques are indispensable in diagnosing and managing breast cancer. While mammography is the primary screening tool, MRI plays a significant role when mammography results are inconclusive or in patients with dense breast tissue. MRI has become standard in breast cancer imaging, providing detailed anatomic and functional data, including tumor perfusion and cellularity. A key characteristic of breast tumors is angiogenesis, a biological process that promotes tumor development and growth. Increased angiogenesis in tumors generally indicates poor prognosis and increased risk of metastasis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI measures tumor perfusion and serves as an in vivo metric for angiogenesis. DCE-MRI has become the cornerstone of breast MRI, boasting a high negative-predictive value of 89% to 99%, although its specificity can vary. This review presents a thorough overview of magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in breast cancer, focusing on the role of DCE-MRI in clinical applications and exploring emerging MR perfusion imaging techniques.

The assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with DCE-MRI and DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating the pathological response of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and further indirectly compare the diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI and DWI.

METHODS

Literatures associated to DCE-MRI and DWI in the evaluation of pathological response of MIBC to NAC were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library, web of science, and EMBASE databases. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI and DWI in predicting the pathological response to NAC in patients with MIBC.

RESULTS

There were 11 studies involved, 6 of which only underwent DCE- MRI examination, 4 of which only underwent DWI examination, and 1 of which underwent both DCE- MRI and DWI examination. The pooled SE, SP, PLR, NLR, DOR of DCE-MRI were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-0.96), 7.4 (95% CI: 2.3-24.2), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07-0.27), and 53 (95% CI: 10-288), respectively. The pooled SE, SP, PLR, NLR, DOR of DWI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), 7.1 (95% CI: 4.3-11.7), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.28), and 36 (95% CI:18-73), respectively. The AUCs of SROC curve for DCE-MRI and DWI were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. There were no significant differences between DWI and DCE-MRI for SE, SP, and AUC.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated high diagnostic performance of both DCE-MRI and DWI in predicting the pathological response to NAC in MIBC. DWI might be a potential substitute for DCE-MRI, with no significant difference in diagnostic performance between the two. However, caution should be taken when applying our results, as our results were based on indirect comparison.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

No previous studies have comprehensively analysed the value of DCE-MRI and DWI in evaluating the pathological response to NAC in MIBC. According to the current study, both DCE-MRI and DWI yielded high diagnostic performance, with the AUCs of 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Indirect comparison no significant difference in the diagnostic performanceof DCE-MRI and DWI.

Breast MRI - The champion in the millimeter league: MIO breast MRI - The method of choice in women with dense breasts

We perform MRI of the breast as a first pass technique. We successfully established 10-minute-protocols (including T2 images) with a fixed dosage of 5 ml 1 M CM. A high spatial resolution of 526 × 526, better 672 × 672 or maximum (1.024 × 1.024, MIO MRI) is vital to achieve best results. We use fixation tools to avoid motion artifacts. Motion correction algorithms can, however, often eliminate such artifacts when they are present. In initial breast MRI exams, morphologic features are the most important criteria for lesion evaluation. If previous exams are available for comparison, the main criteria indicating a suspicious lesion are an increase in lesion size or the depiction of new lesions. High quality HR MRI of the breast is the method of choice in women with dense or extremely dense breasts in all cases (screening, assessment, follow up). In density type A or B, MRI can be helpful in defined constellations, e.g. when MX and US are limited or contraindicated. According to our experience, 95% or more of all carcinomas of the breast are detectable on MRI. The remaining 5% of MRI-occult lesions are intraductal tumors or very small invasive carcinomas depicted with mammography due to associated microcalcifications. MRI is, however, superior to all other imaging modalities in the detection of the clinically relevant DCIS (high risk DCIS, intermediate type). Consecutive MRI examinations in intervals of 12 to 24 months allow a reliable detection of invasive breast cancer with an average size of 7-8 mm. This corresponds to a rate of metastasis-free locoregional lymph nodes in >95% of cases. The rate of interval cancers is <2%. In conclusion, this strategy may increase the overall-lifetime survival of breast cancer patients to more than 95%. Inversely, mortality may be reduced to <5%. Taking these improvements in early breast cancer detection and survival that can be achieved through the implementation of QA HR MRI of the breast into account, it should be discussed to modify oncologic guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer. MRI is the best diagnostic tool we have and according to our experience, a first pass, quality-assured high-resolution breast MRI protocol provides best diagnostic results at minimal procedural effort.

Assessment and Response to Neoadjuvant Treatments in Breast Cancer: Current Practice, Response Monitoring, Future Approaches and Perspectives

Neoadjuvant treatments (NAT) for breast cancer (BC) consist in the administration of chemotherapy-more rarely endocrine therapy-before surgery. Firstly, it was introduced 50 years ago to downsize locally advanced (inoperable) BCs. NAT are now widespread and so effective to be used also at the early stage of the disease. NAT are heterogeneous in terms of therapeutic patterns, class of used drugs, dosage, and duration. The poly-chemotherapy regimen and administration schedule are established by a multi-disciplinary team, according to the stage of disease, the tumor subtype and the age, the physical status, and the drug sensitivity of BC patients. Consequently, an accurate monitoring of treatment response can provide significant clinical advantages, such as the treatment de-escalation in case of early recognition of complete response or, on the contrary, the switch to an alternative treatment path in case of early detection of resistance to the ongoing therapy. Future is going toward increasingly personalized therapies and the prediction of individual response to treatment is the key to practice customized care pathways, preserving oncological safety and effectiveness. To gain such goal, the development of an accurate monitoring system, reproducible and reliable alone or as part of more complex diagnostic algorithms, will be promising.

MRI to assess response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to estimate and compare sensitivity, specificity, positive- (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting pathological complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We stratified for molecular subtype by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and explored the impact of other factors. Two researchers systematically searched PUBMED and EMBASE to select relevant studies and extract data. For meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity, we used bivariate random-effects models. Twenty-six included studies contained 4497 patients. There was a significant impact of IHC subtype on post-NAC MRI accuracy (p = 0.0082) for pCR. The pooled sensitivity was 0.67 [95% CI 0.58-0.74] for the HR-/HER2-, 0.65 [95% CI 0.56-0.73] for the HR-/HER2+, 0.55 [95% CI 0.45-0.64] for the HR+/HER2- and 0.60 [95% CI 0.50-0.70] for the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The pooled specificity was 0.85 [95% CI 0.81-0.88] for the HR-/HER2-, 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.86] for the HR-/HER2+, 0.88[95% CI 0.84-0.91] for the HR+/HER2- and 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.83] for the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The PPV was highest in the HR-/HER2- subtype and lowest in the HR+/HER2- subtype. MRI field strength of 3.0 T was associated with a higher sensitivity compared to 1.5 T (p = 0.00063). The accuracy of MRI for predicting pCR depends on molecular subtype, which should be taken into account in clinical practice. Higher MRI field strength positively impacts accuracy. When intervention trials based on MRI response evaluation are designed, the impact of IHC subtype and field strength on MR accuracy should be considered.

A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles

Purpose

The neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (NABC) is a rapidly changing area that benefits from guidelines integrating evidence with expert consensus to help direct practice. This can optimize patient outcomes by ensuring the appropriate use of evolving neoadjuvant principles.

Methods

An expert panel formulated evidence-based practice recommendations spanning the entire neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment journey. These were sent for practice-based consensus across Canada using the modified Delphi methodology, through a secure online survey. Final recommendations were graded using the GRADE criteria for guidelines. The evidence was reviewed over the course of guideline development to ensure recommendations remained aligned with current relevant data.

Results

Response rate to the online survey was almost 30%; representation was achieved from various medical specialties from both community and academic centres in various Canadian provinces. Two rounds of consensus were required to achieve 80% or higher consensus on 59 final statements. Five additional statements were added to reflect updated evidence but not sent for consensus.

Conclusions

Key highlights of this comprehensive Canadian guideline on NABC include the use of neoadjuvant therapy for early stage triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer, with subsequent adjuvant treatments for patients with residual disease. The use of molecular signatures, other targeted adjuvant therapies, and optimal response-based local regional management remain actively evolving areas. Many statements had evolving or limited data but still achieved high consensus, demonstrating the utility of such a guideline in helping to unify practice while further evidence evolves in this important area of breast cancer management.

Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 are currently the reference standard for evaluating efficacy of therapies in patients with solid tumours who are included in clinical trials, and they are widely used and accepted by regulatory agencies. This expert statement discusses the principles underlying RECIST, as well as their reproducibility and limitations. While the RECIST framework may not be perfect, the scientific bases for the anticancer drugs that have been approved using a RECIST-based surrogate endpoint remain valid. Importantly, changes in measurement have to meet thresholds defined by RECIST for response classification within thus partly circumventing the problems of measurement variability. The RECIST framework also applies to clinical patients in individual settings even though the relationship between tumour size changes and outcome from cohort studies is not necessarily translatable to individual cases. As reproducibility of RECIST measurements is impacted by reader experience, choice of target lesions and detection/interpretation of new lesions, it can result in patients changing response categories when measurements are near threshold values or if new lesions are missed or incorrectly interpreted. There are several situations where RECIST will fail to evaluate treatment-induced changes correctly; knowledge and understanding of these is crucial for correct interpretation. Also, some patterns of response/progression cannot be correctly documented by RECIST, particularly in relation to organ-site (e.g. bone without associated soft-tissue lesion) and treatment type (e.g. focal therapies). These require specialist reader experience and communication with oncologists to determine the actual impact of the therapy and best evaluation strategy. In such situations, alternative imaging markers for tumour response may be used but the sources of variability of individual imaging techniques need to be known and accounted for. Communication between imaging experts and oncologists regarding the level of confidence in a biomarker is essential for the correct interpretation of a biomarker and its application to clinical decision-making. Though measurement automation is desirable and potentially reduces the variability of results, associated technical difficulties must be overcome, and human adjudications may be required.

Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer, aiming to reduce tumor size before surgery. Unfortunately, less than 30% of patients generally achieve a pathological complete response and approximately 5% of patients show disease progression while receiving NAC. Accurate assessment of the response to NAC is crucial for subsequent surgical planning. Furthermore, early prediction of tumor response could avoid patients being overtreated with useless chemotherapy sections, which are not free from side effects and psychological implications. In this review, we first analyze and compare the accuracy of conventional and advanced imaging techniques as well as discuss the application of artificial intelligence tools in the assessment of tumor response after NAC. Thereafter, the role of advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI, nuclear medicine, and new hybrid PET/MRI imaging in the prediction of the response to NAC is described in the second part of the review. Finally, future perspectives in NAC response prediction, represented by AI applications, are discussed.

"The Pituitary within GRASP" - Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Dynamic MRI Technique and Applications to the Pituitary Gland

MRI is the preferred radiologic modality for evaluating the pituitary gland. An important component of pituitary MRI examinations is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Compared to conventional dynamic techniques, golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) imaging offers multiple advantages, including the ability to achieve higher spatial and temporal resolution. In this narrative review, we discuss dynamic imaging of the pituitary gland, the technical fundamentals of GRASP, and applications of GRASP to the pituitary gland.

Early ultrasound evaluation identifies excellent responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity exists in the response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to standard anthracycline (AC)/taxane-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), with 40% to 50% of patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Early assessment of the imaging response during NAST may identify a subset of TNBCs that are likely to have a pCR upon completion of treatment. The authors aimed to evaluate the performance of early ultrasound (US) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant NAST in identifying excellent responders to NAST among patients with TNBC.

METHODS

Two hundred fifteen patients with TNBC were enrolled in the ongoing ARTEMIS (A Robust TNBC Evaluation Framework to Improve Survival) clinical trial. The patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n = 107) and a validation cohort (n = 108). A receiver operating characteristic analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to model the probability of a pCR on the basis of the tumor volume reduction (TVR) percentage by US from the baseline to after 2 cycles of AC.

RESULTS

Overall, 39.3% of the patients (42 of 107) achieved a pCR. A positive predictive value (PPV) analysis identified a cutoff point of 80% TVR after 2 cycles; the pCR rate was 77% (17 of 22) in patients with a TVR ≥ 80%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .0001). In the validation cohort, the pCR rate was 44%. The PPV for pCR with a TVR ≥ 80% after 2 cycles was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%), and the AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The TVR percentage by US evaluation after 2 cycles of NAST may be a cost-effective early imaging biomarker for a pCR to AC/taxane-based NAST.

An MRI-Based Radiomic Prognostic Index Predicts Poor Outcome and Specific Genetic Alterations in Endometrial Cancer

Integrative tumor characterization linking radiomic profiles to corresponding gene expression profiles has the potential to identify specific genetic alterations based on non-invasive radiomic profiling in cancer. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a radiomic prognostic index (RPI) based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess possible associations between the RPI and gene expression profiles in endometrial cancer patients. Tumor texture features were extracted from preoperative 2D MRI in 177 endometrial cancer patients. The RPI was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression in a study cohort (n = 95) and validated in an MRI validation cohort (n = 82). Transcriptional alterations associated with the RPI were investigated in the study cohort. Potential prognostic markers were further explored for validation in an mRNA validation cohort (n = 161). The RPI included four tumor texture features, and a high RPI was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in both the study cohort (p < 0.001) and the MRI validation cohort (p = 0.030). The association between RPI and gene expression profiles revealed 46 significantly differentially expressed genes in patients with a high RPI versus a low RPI (p < 0.001). The most differentially expressed genes, COMP and DMBT1, were significantly associated with disease-specific survival in both the study cohort and the mRNA validation cohort. In conclusion, a high RPI score predicts poor outcome and is associated with specific gene expression profiles in endometrial cancer patients. The promising link between radiomic tumor profiles and molecular alterations may aid in developing refined prognostication and targeted treatment strategies in endometrial cancer.

Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, neoadjuvant treatment trials have shown that breast cancer subtypes identified on the basis of genomic and/or molecular signatures exhibit different response rates and recurrence outcomes, with the implication that subtype-specific treatment approaches are needed. Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers present a unique set of challenges for determining optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches. There is increased recognition that not all ER+ breast cancers benefit from chemotherapy, and that there may be a subset of ER+ breast cancers that can be treated effectively using endocrine therapies alone. With this uncertainty, there is a need to improve the assessment and to optimize the treatment of ER+ breast cancers. While pathology-based markers offer a snapshot of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, non-invasive imaging of the ER disease in response to treatment would provide broader insights into tumor heterogeneity, ER biology, and the timing of surrogate endpoint measurements. In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of breast imaging in neoadjuvant studies and highlight the technological advances in each imaging modality. We then further examine some potential imaging markers for neoadjuvant treatment response in ER+ breast cancers.

Tumor segmentation analysis at different post-contrast time points: A possible source of variability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

to assess if tumor segmentation analysis performed at different post-contrast time points (TPs) on dynamic images could influence the extraction of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), and potentially represent a source of variability.

METHOD

forty patients with forty-two LABC lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent breast DCE-MRI examination at 3 T. On post-processed dynamic images, enhancing tumor lesions were manually segmented at four different TPs: at the first post-contrast dynamic image in which the lesion was appreciable (TP 1) and at 1, 5 and 10 min after contrast-agent administration (TPs 2, 3 and 4, respectively) and corresponding DCE-MRI parameters were extracted. Friedman's test followed by Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon signed rank test for post-hoc analysis was used to compare DCE-MRI parameters. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of DCE-MRI parameters measurements was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis.

RESULTS

Ktrans, Kep and iAUC were significantly higher when extracted from ROIs placed at TP1 and progressively decreased from TP 2-4. The intra-observer reliability ranged from good to excellent (ICC's: 0.894 to 0.990). The inter-observer reliability varied from moderate to excellent (0.770 to 0.942). The inter-observer reliability was significantly higher for Ktrans and Kep extracted at TPs1 and 2 as compared to TPs 3 and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant variability of DCE-MRI quantitative parameters occurs when tumor segmentation is performed at different TPs. We suggest to performing tumor delineation at an established TP, preferably the earliest, in order to extract reliable and comparable DCE-MRI data.