Heart rate modulates the relationship of augmented systolic blood pressure with the blood natriuretic peptide levels

AIMS

Augmented central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), which is known to affect the cardiac afterload, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While an inverse relationship is known to exist between the heart rate (HR) and the cSBP, it has not yet been clarified if the HR also modulates the association between the cSBP and the cardiac afterload. The present study was conducted to clarify whether the association of the cSBP with the serum levels of the N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) differs between subjects with high and low HRs, using data obtained from the same subjects on two occasions (2009 and 2012) so as to confirm their consistency.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The radial augmentation index, systolic pressure at the second peak of the radial pressure waveform (SBP2), and serum NT-proBNP levels were measured and analysed in a worksite cohort of 2000 middle-aged men in 2009 and in 2012. The subjects were divided into three groups by the HR (i.e. ≤69, 70-79, and ≥80 b.p.m.). While the serum NT-proBNP levels were similar among the three groups, the radial augmentation index increased (from 61 ± 12% to 72 ± 13%, P < 0.01 in 2009 and from 61 ± 13% to 73 ± 12%, P < 0.01 in 2012) and the SBP1-2 decreased (from 18 ± 7 to 13 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.01 in 2009 and from 19 ± 7 to 13 ± 6 mmHg, P < 0.01 in 2012) significantly with decreasing HR. After the adjustment, the SBP2 showed a significant association with the serum NT-proBNP levels in the overall study population [non-standardized coefficient (B) = 0.005, standard error (SE) = 0.001, P < 0.01 in 2009 (n = 2257) and B = 0.004, SE = 0.001, P < 0.01 in 2012 (n = 1986)]. In subgroup analyses, the SBP2 showed a significant association with the serum NT-proBNP levels [B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, P = 0.02 in 2009 (n = 1291) and B = 0.005, SE = 0.001, P < 0.01 in 2012 (n = 1204)] only in the subject group with an HR of ≤69 b.p.m.

CONCLUSIONS

In middle-aged Japanese men, the relationship between the cSBP and the cardiac afterload appears to differ depending on the HR; the results of our analysis showed that the relationship between the cSBP and the cardiac overload may be more pronounced and strongly significant in patients with low HRs as compared with patients with high HRs.

Occurrence of composite cardiac endpoints with change in resting heart rate among Chinese patients with coronary artery disease: Chinese cohort from the real-world BISO-CAD study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated change in resting heart rate (RHR) and its impact on prognosis in Chinese coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with bisoprolol, and also assessed drug safety and tolerability.

METHODS

This phase IV, single arm observational study was a sub-study of the BISO-CAD study conducted across 20 hospitals in China between October 2011 and July 2015 with follow-up at 6, 12 and 18 months after baseline. The primary endpoint was occurrence of composite cardiac events.

RESULTS

A total of 663 CAD patients (baseline RHR 75.47 ± 6.62 bpm) were enrolled in the intent-to-treat (ITT) set, and 513 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (EA) set. In the ITT set, the risk and the number of composite cardiac events in patients with mean RHR 69-74 bpm were significantly higher than in the <65 bpm group (ITT: estimate 1.03 ± 0.47, p = .029). The incidence of the composite cardiac endpoint was not affected by continuous mean RHR (p = .5070). RHR significantly decreased from baseline to 18 months, most obviously in the first 6 months (p < .0001). Ejection fraction and fractional shortening significantly improved in both the ITT and EA sets. An average RHR of 69-74 bpm had a significant effect on admission to hospital for acute coronary syndrome in the ITT (estimate 1.10, HR 3.004, p = .0196) and EA (estimate 1.26, HR 3.526, p = .0132) groups. Seven (1.1%) patients reported drug related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Reduction in RHR with bisoprolol lowered the incidence of composite cardiac events along with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

Heart rate control is associated with reduced cardiovascular events in Asian patients with coronary artery disease treated with bisoprolol (BISO-CAD): results from a multi-national, real-world experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between decrease in resting heart rate (RHR) and occurrence of composite cardiac clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after bisoprolol treatment.

METHODS

This phase IV, multi-national, single-arm, open-label, non-randomized, observational trial was conducted between October 2011 and July 2015 across 42 hospitals from China, South Korea and Vietnam.

RESULTS

Analysis of 866 patients (mean age 63.85 ± 10.35; mean RHR at baseline 75.71 ± 6.87 bpm in intent-to-treat [ITT]; 75.56 ± 6.73 in efficacy analysis [EA] sets) was performed. Patients with lower mean RHR had fewer composite cardiac events and patients with RHR of 69-74 bpm reported significantly higher outcomes than patients with RHR <65 bpm (p = .0449). A significant association with occurrence of the composite cardiac outcome and hospital admission for unstable angina or revascularization was reported in the EA set (regression estimate: 0.03, 95% CI 0.00-0.07, p = .0412) and not in the ITT set for bisoprolol treated CAD patients. Composite cardiac outcomes significantly increased in patients with mean RHR ≥70 bpm compared to patients with mean RHR <70 bpm (p = .0328). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 206 (23.8%) patients, of whom 102 (11.8%) patients had serious adverse event (SAEs). Among the patients with SAEs, 11 (1.3%) patients died. Treatment related adverse events were only 12 (1.4%). No treatment related SAE happened.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed bisoprolol to be efficacious, in terms of lowering RHR and causing a significant decrease in the occurrence of the composite cardiac outcome, as well as safe in Asian patients with CAD.

Practical Applications for Single Pill Combinations in the Cardiovascular Continuum

Despite the availability of new drugs and devices, the treatment of cardiovascular disease remains suboptimal. Single-pill combination therapy offers a number of potential advantages. It can combine different classes of drugs to increase efficacy while mitigating the risks of treatment-related adverse events, reduce pill burden, lower medical cost, and improve patient adherence. Furthermore, in hypertension, single pill combinations include standard to lower doses of each drug than would be necessary to achieve goals with monotherapy, which may explain their better tolerability compared with higher dose monotherapy. Combination therapy is now established in the treatment of hypertension. In ischaemic heart disease, the concept of a preventative polypill has been studied, but its benefits have not been established conclusively. However, the combination of ivabradine and beta-blockers has proven efficacy in patients with stable angina pectoris. This combination has also demonstrated benefits in patients with chronic heart failure.

Defining the role of trimetazidine in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders: some insights on its role in heart failure and peripheral artery disease

Trimetazidine is a cytoprotective drug whose cardiovascular effectiveness, especially in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, has been the source of much controversy in recent years; some have gone so far as to treat the medication as a ‘placebo drug’ whose new side effects, such as Parkinsonian symptoms, outweigh its benefits. This article is an attempt to present the recent key studies, including meta-analyses, on the use of trimetazidine in chronic heart failure, also in patients with diabetes mellitus and arrhythmia, as well as in peripheral artery disease. This paper also includes the most recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines, including those of 2013, on the use of trimetazidine in cardiovascular disease.

Heart failure in the diabetic population - pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

Evidence from clinical trials repeatedly confirms the association of diabetes with heart failure, independent of hypertension, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease. However, the importance of coexistence of diabetes and heart failure is not universally recognized, despite the fact that it may significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality of the diabetic population. It seems that prevention of heart failure, early diagnosis, and appropriate management could improve the outcome. Unfortunately, the etiology of heart failure in diabetic patients is still to be elucidated. It is multifactorial in nature and several cellular, molecular and metabolic factors are implicated. Additionally, there are still no definite guidelines on either the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure in diabetic patients or on the therapy of diabetes in subjects with heart failure. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevention of heart failure in the diabetic population as well as management of both comorbidities.

Effect of Carvedilol, Ivabradine or their combination on exercise capacity in patients with Heart Failure (the CARVIVA HF trial)

AIM

Patients with heart failure (HF) have reduced exercise capacity. The beneficial effect of beta-blocker on prognosis is not matched by an impact on exercise capacity and quality of life. We performed a randomised open blinded endpoint study to assess the effect of heart rate reduction with carvedilol, ivabradine, and their combination on exercise capacity in HF patients receiving maximal dose of ACE inhibitor.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After a run-in phase patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups: carvedilol up to 25mg bid (n=38); ivabradine up to 7.5mg bid (n=41); and carvedilol/ivabradine up to 12.5/7.5mg bid (n=42). The maximal dose of study treatment was more frequently tolerated in patients receiving ivabradine (36/41) than in those receiving carvedilol (18/38) or combination therapy (32/42) (P<0.01 ivabradine versus carvedilol). Heart rate was reduced in all three groups, but to a greater extent by the combination. The distance walked on the 6-min walking test and the exercise time on MVO(2) test significantly improved in the ivabradine and combination groups (both P<0.01 versus baseline), as did peak VO(2) and VAT (P<0.01 for ivabradine and P<0.03 for combination versus carvedilol, respectively). No changes in these parameters were found with carvedilol. The patients receiving ivabradine or the combination had better quality of life (P<0.01 versus baseline for ivabradine and P<0.02 for combination), versus no change with carvedilol.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine alone or in combination with carvedilol is more effective than carvedilol alone at improving exercise tolerance and quality of life in HF patients.