Comparison of multiple-dose and once-daily nitrate therapy in 1212 patients with stable angina pectoris: effects on quality of life indices. Dutch Mononitrate Quality of Life (DUMQOL) Study Group

Compound salvia pellet might be more effective and safer for chronic stable angina pectoris compared with nitrates: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic stable angina (CSA) resulted in a considerable burden for both individuals and the society. In this study we aimed to critically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Compound salvia pellet compared with nitrates in the treatment of Chronic Stable Angina (CSA) pectoris, and to provide more credible evidence for clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive and exhaustive search strategy was formulated to identify potential RCTs of compound salvia pellet for CSA in international and Chinese databases from their inception to July 4th, 2018. We also searched the bibliographies of relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included trials by using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1849 citations and 51 RCTs (n = 4732) were included for meta-analysis after titles, abstracts and full text selection according to eligibility criteria. The pooled results suggested that compound salvia pellet was much more effective than nitrates in the improvement of angina symptoms (therapy = 4 weeks, RR = 1.23, 95%CI = [1.17, 1.30], P < .001, I = 0%; therapy = 4 weeks, RR = 1.13, 95%CI = [1.08, 1.17], P < .001, I = 45.6%), and ECG test (therapy = 4 weeks, RR = 1.24, 95%CI [1.14, 1.35], P < .001, I = 51.5%; and therapy > 4 weeks, RR = 1.30, 95%CI[1.20, 1.42], P < .001, I = 36.4%) in CSA. Compared with nitrates, the percentage of patients with adverse events significantly decreased when prescribed with compound salvia pellet (3.2% vs 17.0%).

CONCLUSION

Compound salvia pellet might be more effective on the improvement of angina symptoms, ECG test and with few adverse events compared with nitrates. While there are some limitations in this study, which may weaken the results, we believe the findings could provide useful information for stakeholders concerned with outcomes in patients with CSA. More rigorous RCTs with high quality are needed to confirm these findings.

Chronic nitrate therapy in patients with angina with comorbidity

In a retrospective study from the Dutch Mononitrate Quality of Life (DUMQOL) Study Group, the authors found that patients with angina with concomitant diabetes or hypercholesterolemia derived more benefit from changing over to a once-daily nitrate treatment regimen than did patients without angina. The aim of this study was to assess this issue prospectively. In an open-label study, patients with stable angina pectoris from facilities in Germany, Portugal, and me Czech Republic were treated for 3 months with multiple daily doses and subsequently for 3 more months with once-daily isosorbide mononitrate/dinitrate. After the first and second 3-month periods, they were assessed by a validated QOL battery including domains for mobility, side effects, life satisfaction, anginal pain, and psychological distress. In the 1045 patients who participated in the study, the mean summary domain scores varied from 5 to 16 points and score improvements from 1.6 to 4.3 points. In the patients without concomitant hypertension and smokers, domain scores improved less than they did in the patients without, with differences in domain score improvements up to 1.0 points (P<0.001), which is substantial considering the range of improvement was between 1.6 and 4.3 points. In the patients with diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolemia, a reverse pattern was observed with differences in domain score improvements up to 0.4 points (P<0.05). Patients with angina with diabetes or hypercholesterolemia derived more benefit from an asymmetric regimen of isosorbide mononitrate/dinitrate than did patients without. Patients with angina with hypertension and smokers benefited less. Differences in endothelial function may be involved.

A population-based study on well-being in the very old: the role of cardiovascular diseases and drugs

Cardiovascular diseases constitute the most common health problems in very old people. Consequently, cardiovascular drugs are the medicines that are most frequently used by elderly subjects. Although many studies have examined the physiological effect and adverse reactions of these drugs, knowledge on their effect on emotional well-being is missing. The present study aims to examine the association between cardiovascular diseases and their medical treatment on the emotional well-being of very old people. We investigated a representative group of elderly subjects gathered from a population-based study (n=235). Participants were 84 years or older and cognitively intact (mini-mental state examination (MMSE) > or =24 points). Well-being was assessed with the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS), measuring different mood categories. Cardiovascular diseases were diagnosed following the International Classification of Diseases. In this population the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases was high (62%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that while being affected by a cardiovascular disease did not affect the emotional well-being of the subjects (PANAS-PA, p=0.171; PANAS-NA, p=0.209), the use of some cardiovascular drugs showed an association. Cardiac glycosides (p=0.006) and nitrates (p=0.008) were associated with increased negative feelings. Due to high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and use of cardiovascular medicines, this finding has relevance on the quality of life of elderly people. However, due to the nature of this study we cannot assess cause-effect relationship of this positive association. Therefore, the present findings suggest that there is a need for clinical studies in this increasing and limited studied age group.

The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Dosing schedules may be one important factor determining whether patients take their prescribed medication. Schedules may influence whether a patient stays on the prescribed therapy and, if so, the degree to which the regimen is followed. Both factors are important determinants of health outcomes and health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes and health care costs.

METHODS

Articles from peer-reviewed journals were identified from the medical literature databases MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and HealthSTAR for the years 1985 through 2002. The search included all references that reported on the impact of a change of dose frequency on chronic disease. Search terms used were combinations of dose frequency, dose schedule, and dosing and efficacy, safety, clinical effectiveness, preferences, adherence, compliance, persistence, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, resource use, and costs.

RESULTS

Reducing the number of daily doses through extended-release formulations or newer drugs has frequently been shown to provide the patient with better symptom control in a number of disease states. Overall improvements were seen in adherence, patient quality of life, patient satisfaction, and costs. However, results of some studies indicate that not all patients, medications, or diseases may be candidates for reduced dosing due to the potential effects on symptom control, incidence of adverse events, and overcompensation for missed doses.

CONCLUSION

Where feasible, reducing dose frequency may offer benefits for the patient in terms of health outcomes and for the health care budget holder in terms of costs.

Reasons for overprescription of mononitrates: the paradigm of stable angina pectoris treatment

BACKGROUND

Oral nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers are used to treat stable angina pectoris (SAP). The 2 therapeutic subtypes of oral nitrates are mononitrates and dinitrates, with no evidence that 1 subtype is more efficacious than the other. Although practice guidelines in Great Britain and Israel recommend dinitrates as the first-line drug for SAP, in practice, many physicians in those 2 countries prescribe mononitrates.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence specialist physicians (family practitioners, internists, and cardiologists) in Israel when prescribing nitrates for the prevention of SAP symptoms.

METHODS

A group of specialists was given a self-administered questionnaire regarding their treatment of choice for a patient with SAP described in a hypothetical case vignette. End points for prescribing preferences were evidence-based information, cost, and the influence of pharmaceutical company representatives.

RESULTS

One hundred ten specialists were given the questionnaire. Eighty-nine specialists (45 men, 44 women; mean age, 50.4 years; range, 34-67 years; response rate, 80.9%) completed it (39 family practitioners, 29 internists, and 21 cardiologists). Seventy-eight respondents (87.6%) chose to prescribe nitrates for the case vignette, and among those, 54 (69.2%) chose mononitrates and 24 (30.8%) chose dinitrates (P = 0.034). The choice of mononitrates over dinitrates was mainly affected by habit (25/54 [46.3%]) and the belief that mononitrates are more effective, safer, and/or less expensive than dinitrates (21/54 [38.9%]). Drug costs for the patient significantly influenced more family practitioners than hospital specialists (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to guideline recommendations, the paradigm of SAP treatment with nitrates in this study was characterized by significantly more prescriptions for mononitrates than dinitrates. This situation contributes to the erosion of the scarce resources of the health care system in Israel. Further efforts are needed to increase physicians' awareness of quality, cost, and choices when prescribing drugs.

[Compliance with chronic pain treatment: study of demographic, therapeutic and psychosocial variables]

The aims of this study were to identify the prevalence of compliance with drug therapy in patients with chronic pain and analyze the relationships between compliance and characteristics of drug therapy and psychosocial factors (beliefs regarding pain, health locus of control and depression). Thirty patients were evaluated 5 times over a period of 6 months. Total compliance occurred in 43.3% to 56.7% of the patients. Partial compliance and non-compliance were high (40.0%-56.7%). The index of compliance did not vary over the six months. Low compliance related to occurrence of side effects and beliefs that the control of health depended on the patient, pain is a disability, that pain means the presence of physical injury and solicitous behavior of others is desirable when there is manifestation of pain. Knowing the factors involved in compliance enables us to test interventions that optimize it.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new controlled-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate 60 mg scored tablet (Monoket Multitab)

The influences of food, tablet splitting, and fractional dosing on the pharmacokinetics of a new controlled-release double-scored tablet containing 60 mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Monoket Multitab) were investigated in healthy male volunteers. Food interaction was evaluated after single dose administration under fasted conditions and after a standard high-fat breakfast. The effect of tablet splitting was assessed at steady-state, after 5 days of once daily dosing with the tablet taken intact or trisected. The influence of fractional dosing was assessed after 1 and 6 days of daily regimen of 40 mg in the morning (2/3 of a tablet) and 20 mg in the evening (1/3 of a tablet). The pharmacokinetics of isosorbide-5-mononitrate after taking the tablet intact or in three fragments were very similar with a mere 10% increase of maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for the latter, while the time to peak (T(max)) decreased from 5 to 4 h and areas under the concentration vs. time curves (AUCs) were virtually unchanged. Morning trough concentration reached 53 and 46 ng/ml, respectively. Administration of the intact tablet after a high-fat breakfast increased C(max) by 18% and AUC by 21%, and slightly delayed T(max) from 5 to 6h. During fractional dosing, morning and evening C(max) reached 364 and 315 ng/ml on the first day, and 373 and 300 ng/ml on the 6th day, respectively. The ratio of AUC(0-24 h) on the last day to AUC(infinity) on the first day, was 82.1% (confidence limits 71.7-94.1%) possibly resulting from peripheral volume expansion. The release characteristics of Monoket Multitab are thus moderately influenced by concomitant intake of food and to a very minor extent by tablet breaking. Fractional dosing allows to achieve lower peak and higher morning trough levels, while total exposure is comparable to that during once daily dosing (AUC(0-24 h, s.s.) of 5.55+/-1.78 and 5.71+/-1.08 microg h/ml).

The UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK): reliability, validity and responsiveness

The study assesses the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK). The instrument was anglicised and administered by self-completed postal questionnaire to 959 patients recruited from general practices in the North East of England. A total of 655 (68.3%) patients returned a completed questionnaire. Principal component analysis produced three important dimensions: physical limitations, anginal frequency and perception and treatment satisfaction. Four items that performed poorly were removed from the instrument. The removal of items greatly increased the number of computable scale scores. Estimates of internal reliability for the three dimensions ranged from 0.83-0.92. Estimates of test-retest reliability were above accepted standards. The correlation between the SAQ-UK scores and the SF-12, EuroQol and health transition was evidence for the validity of the instrument. The SAQ-UK produced responsiveness statistics that were comparable to the parent instrument and was more responsive to improvements in health than the generic instruments. The SAQ-UK is recommended as a measure of health outcome for the evaluation of angina management.

Factors influencing efficacy of nitrate therapy for stable angina pectoris: a multiple linear regression analysis

In an open-label self-controlled study of 1,350 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), we previously demonstrated that 50 mg of isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) slow release formulation once daily not only provided a better antianginal effect but also a better quality of life (QOL) than did the daily administration of multiple small doses of the compound. It is unknown whether certain patient characteristics contribute to this benefit. The objective of this article was to determine what independent factors contribute to this benefit. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed on the data from these 1,350 patients. Quality of life was assessed by the Marquis QOL-questionnaire for patients with angina and included the domains of immobility, pain, and psychological distress. For the purpose of this study, overall QOL was calculated as the pooled sums of the domain scores and expressed as mean scores on an ordinal scale of 10. Age did not influence the beneficial effect of nitrate therapy on QOL. Neither did gender, rhythmic disturbances, peripheral artery disease, or the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers. New York Heart Association (NYHA) angina classification was an independent variable: patients with a NYHA class I or II benefited less than did patients with NYHA III or IV (p = 0.02). Obese patients as well as hypertensive patients benefited less (p = 0.04 and 0.02), and smokers tended to benefit less also (p = 0.08). In contrast, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus improved the beneficial effect of nitrates on QOL (p = 0.03 and 0.05). The authors conclude that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolemia, a category particularly prone to early endothelial dysfunction and thus dysfunctional endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production, may benefit more from NO-donor therapy than patients without such concomitant conditions.

Managed substitution of modified release nitrates with an asymmetric dosing regimen

BACKGROUND

Orally administered modified release organic nitrates are used commonly in the prophylaxis of myocardial ischaemia, although little evidence indicates a clinically superior response compared with standard formulated preparations administered symmetrically.

AIM

To investigate the clinical success of transfer of suitable patients from MR to SF nitrates.

METHOD

Suitable candidates for therapeutic substitution, assessed by a pharmacist, completed a baseline study to estimate frequency and timing of chest pain, the number of rescue doses of sublingual nitrates required, together with an assessment of adverse effects experienced. Following substitution to an eccentric dosing schedule, a further one month's assessment of chest pain frequency, rescue nitrate use and adverse effects was recorded and compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Twelve (37.5%) patients from a possible 32 candidates were invited to complete a baseline symptoms and adverse event diary. Eight patients entered the study phase (66.7% of the 12 included in the baseline phase of the study). These candidates showed no evidence of loss of control of chest pain symptoms, 3.5 +/- 1.16 (mean +/- standard error of mean) episodes/patient/28 days compared with 1.9 +/- 0.96 episodes/patient/28 days during the test phase (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no difference in the number of doses of rescue nitrates required when the trial phase (2.6 +/- 1.63 doses/patient/28 days) was compared with the control (2.0 +/- 1.31 doses/patient/28 days, P > 0.05). There was no evidence of an increased incidence of adverse effects during the trial period of the study.

CONCLUSION

This small study suggests that, if selected carefully, therapeutic substitution of MR oral nitrates can be managed successfully without apparent risk of loss of symptom control or increased incidence of adverse effects.

Comparison of 50-mg and 100-mg sustained-release isosorbide mononitrate in the treatment of stable angina pectoris: effects on quality-of-life indices. Dutch Mononitrate Quality of Life (DUMQOL) Study Group

High-dosage nitrates are more effective for the management of anginal symptoms but produce more adverse effects, including development of tolerance and the zero-hour effect (rebound angina at the end of the dosing interval). Such effects may reduce the beneficial effect of treatment on quality of life. In a self-controlled, 6-month study, the effects on symptoms and quality of life of 50 mg and 100 mg sustained-release isosorbide mononitrate (SR ISMN), administered once daily, on anginal symptoms and quality of life (QOL) were assessed in 453 patients with stable angina pectoris. QOL was assessed by means of a test battery based on the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 Health Survey and the Angina Pectoris Quality of Life Questionnaire. The internal consistency and reliability of the multiitem scales were estimated by use of Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Based on their improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) angina classification, patients who received 100 mg daily showed greater improvement than those who received 50 mgdaily; the mean difference between treatments was consistent with a significantly greater improvement of mobility and angina indices. Adverse effects, as estimated by side-effect index, including rebound angina at times of rest, and by patient compliance rating, differed slightly between the two treatment regimens and were even less problematic with the higher dosage than with the lower dosage. Psychological distress index and life satisfaction scores also were significantly higher with 100 mg than with 50 mg daily. The results of this study suggest that SR ISMN 100 mg once daily provided a better NYHA angina classification than SR ISMN 50 mg did and did not produce further adverse effects. In addition SR ISMN 100 mg improved various QOL indices more than SR ISMN 50 mg did, particularly the mobility index and certain life satisfaction scores, which are the most important indicators of QOL in this category of patients.

Long-acting isosorbide mononitrate

Elantan long (EL) is the only long-acting isosorbide mononitrate formulation based on a controlled membrane principle. 30% of the dose is available for immediate release and the remaining 70% is gradually released over time. After oral administration, isosorbide mononitrate EL has a quick onset of action (30 minutes) and effects are evident for up to 17 hours. The antianginal effects of once-daily isosorbide mononitrate EL 50 to 100mg were generally similar to those of conventional isosorbide mononitrate or isosorbide dinitrate 10 to 20mg twice or 3 times daily, or sustained-release nifedipine 20mg twice or 3 times daily. Patients tended to show a better response with once-daily isosorbide mononitrate EL 50mg than with bupranolol 100mg. Patients showed significantly greater improvement in some quality-of-life indices with once-daily isosorbide mononitrate EL than with twice or 3 times daily regimens of conventional isosorbide mononitrate or isosorbide dinitrate. Tolerance did not develop after 13 months of once-daily administration of isosorbide mononitrate EL. No rebound increase in incidence of ischaemic episodes was observed after discontinuation of the drug.