Effects of peritonsillar infiltration on post-tonsillectomy pain. A double-blind study

#10-Year Challenge: Local anaesthetic for post-tonsillectomy pain: Update meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Adequate management of post-tonsillectomy pain is an important consideration in postoperative management after tonsillectomy. A 2008 meta-analysis showed that the use of local anaesthetic either by infiltration or topical application reduced postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVES

To review the current evidence for the use of local anaesthetic as a means of reducing post-tonsillectomy pain and compare current evidence to the previous meta-analysis 10 years ago.

METHOD

Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE [*"ANESTHETICS, LOCAL"/ AND *TONSILLECTOMY/], EMBASE [*"LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT"/ AND *TONSILLECTOMY/] and PubMed [(Tonsillectomy).ti,ab AND (Local Anaesthetic).ti,ab OR (Local Anesthetic).ti,ab]. A meta-analysis of randomised control trials assessing the use of local anaesthetic agents for post-tonsillectomy pain.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, local anaesthetic, applied topically or infiltrated, significantly reduces pain scores compared with controls at 4-6 hours [-0.65 (95% CI: -0.77; -0.53)]; 24 hours [-0.50 (95% CI: -0.66, -0.35)]; and 5-7 days [-0.78 (95% CI: -0.90, -0.65)] (standardised mean differences).

CONCLUSION

Current studies suggest that use of peri-operative local anaesthetic during tonsillectomy does improve postoperative pain outcomes. The limitations of the analysis are as follows: all studies are small, and a multi-centred larger trial is recommended to guarantee statistical reliability. There was no description of significant adverse side effects from local anaesthetic use.

Intraoperative Use of Analgesics in Tonsillar Fossa and Postoperative Evaluation with Visual analogue Scale Scores-A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Introduction  Posttonsillectomy pain results in significant morbidity to the patients. There is a disagreement in the literature regarding the use of local anesthetics during tonsillectomy. The aim of this placebo-controlled, double-blind study is to evaluate the effect of peritonsillar administration of local anesthetics. Objective  To evaluate the role of intraoperative use of analgesics in tonsillar fossa and postoperative evaluation with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in achieving pain relief after tonsillectomy procedure Methods  In this study, 180 patients were randomized to 1 of the 6 groups: bupivacaine infiltration, lidocaine infiltration, normal saline infiltration, bupivacaine packing, lidocaine packing, and normal saline packing. Pain caused by speaking, swallowing, and on rest was assessed using VAS at 4, 8, 12, 16 hours, and at discharge. Results  Significant analgesia was obtained in patients who received bupivacaine infiltration and packing compared with placebo ( p  < 0.05). The majority of the study subjects had no postoperative complications, and patients receiving bupivacaine infiltration required less additional analgesics in the first 24 hours after surgery. Conclusion  We advocate the use of bupivacaine infiltration or packing immediately following the procedure to achieve adequate postoperative analgesia.

Pre-emptive peritonsillar dexamethasone vs. levobupivacaine infiltration for relief of post-adenotonsillectomy pain in children: a controlled clinical study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of the pre-emptive local infiltration of dexamethasone vs. levobupivacaine on postoperative pain and morbidity in pediatric adenotonsillectomy patients.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients (32 males and 28 females), aged 3-14 years, were included in this double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical study from September of 2011 until May of 2012. Patients admitted for adenotonsillectomies after informed consent was obtained from the parents, and randomized into three groups receiving either dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Group 1, mean age 5.9 ± 1.6), levobupivacaine with epinephrine (Group 2, mean age 6.1 ± 2.6), or saline (Group 3, mean age 6.0 ± 3.4). Pain scores at the 1st, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, and 20th hours, and first, second, third and seventh days post-operatively were recorded by the parents using McGrath's face scale. The operation type, operation time and anesthesia time, the time of the first request for postoperative analgesia, and the total number of analgesic interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

Pain scores were revealed in this order: Group 1 (steroid) < Group 2 (levobupivacaine) < Group 3 (saline) at all times (p = 0.000). The anesthesia times for Group 1 and Group 2 were different (steroid vs. levobupivacaine), and the time to first analgesic was longer in Groups 1 (steroid) and 2 (levobupivacaine) than in Group 3 (saline) (p < 0.000). The total number of analgesic interventions was lower in Group 1 (steroid) than in Group 2 (levobupivacaine) and Group 3 (saline) (steroid vs. saline, p = 0.000, and steroid vs. levobupivacaine, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Peritonsillar dexamethasone infiltration was more effective than both levobupivacaine and saline in reducing post-tonsillectomy pain. It was proven to be a safe and effective method.

Comparison of benzydamine hydrochloride and Salvia officinalis as an adjuvant local treatment to systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in controlling pain after tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or both: an open-label, single-blind, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Benzydamine hydrochloride (BNZD) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used in an oral rinse formulation as an adjuvant to other NSAIDs in controlling postoperative pain after tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or both. Salvia officinalis (SO) is a topically applied herbal preparation frequently used for the same indication. Pain, bleeding, and infection are the most common postoperative complications of tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of BNDZ with those of SO as adjuvant treatments in controlling postoperative pain.

METHODS

This open-label, single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital Center "Dr. Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje" (Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro). Pediatric and adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or both were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive BNZD or SO, in addition to ibuprofen 20 mg/kg·d (children) or diclofenac 100 mg/d (adults). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with mild or no pain on postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 7. Secondary end points were the incidences of infection, hemorrhage, and other adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 420 patients were enrolled (217 females, 203 males; 278 children, 142 adults; mean [SD] age, 6.2 [2.1] years [children] and 24.1 [9.8] years [adults] [range, 3-45 years]). One hundred thirty-eight children received BNZD; 140 received SO (both in addition to ibuprofen 20 mg/kg·d). Seventy-two adults received BNZD; 70 received SO (both in addition to diclofenac 100 mg/d). A significantly lower proportion of children treated with adjuvant BNZD experienced moderate or severe pain than those treated with SO at each time point (P < 0.01 at days 1 and 4; P < 0.001 at days 2 and 7). In children, the risk for postoperative infection was similar between BNZD and SO (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 6.9%; 95% CI, 6.4%-7.6%); however, the risk was reduced in adults (ARR, 19.0%; 95% CI, 16.5%-21.9%; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical trial of children and adults who underwent tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or both, BNZD, as an adjuvant to an NSAID, was more effective than SO in controlling postoperative pain and infection. The pain-reducing effect of BNZD was of quick onset and persisted for 1 week after surgery. The safety profile of BNZD was comparable to that of SO, with the exception of postoperative infection in adults, for which BNZD was more efficacious. In particular, the use of BNZD was not associated with a high risk for early postoperative hemorrhage.

Malpractice claims and unintentional outcome of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology

BACKGROUND

Septoplasty, tonsillectomy (with and without adenoidectomy) and cervical lymph node excision are amongst the most common 50 inpatient operations in Germany. Intracapsular tonsillectomies (i.e. tonsillotomies) are increasingly performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate technical traps and pitfalls as well as alleged medical malpractice associated with tonsillectomy (TE), adenoidectomy (AE), tonsillotomy (TT), septoplasty (SP) and cervical lymph node excision (LN).

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to the Regional Medical Conciliation Boards, Medical Services of the Health Insurance Companies (MDK) and Regional Institutes of Forensic Medicine in Germany to collect anonymized cases of complications following TE, TT, AE, LN and SP. The results were discussed in the light of the contemporary medical literature and published trials and verdicts in Germany.

RESULTS

The response rate of our survey was 55.9%. The Institutes of Forensic Medicine contributed nine cases, 49 cases were submitted by the Regional Conciliation Boards and none by MDK. All forensic cases were associated with exsanguinations following tonsillectomy including two children (5 and 8 years of age) and seven adults (aged 20 to 69 years). The fatal post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) had occurred 8.7 days on average; four patients experienced the bleeding episode at home (day 5, 8, 9 and 17, respectively). Repeated episodes of bleeding requiring surgical intervention had occurred in 6 patients. Three Conciliation Boards submitted decicions associated with TT (1), AE (4), LN (3), SP (16) and TE (25). Cases with lethal outcome were not registered. Only three of the 49 cases were assessed as surgical malpractice (6.1%) including lesion of the spinal accessory nerve, wrong indication for TE and dental lesion after insertion of the mouth gag. The review of the medico legal literature yielded 71 published verdicts after AE and TE (29), LN (28) and SP (14) of which 37 resulted in compensation of malpractice after LN (16; 57%), TE (10; 37%), SP (8; 57%) and AE (2; 100%). There were 16 cases of PTH amongst 27 trials after TE resulting either in death (5) or apallic syndrome (5). Bleeding complications had occurred on the day of surgery in only 2 patients. 16 trials were based on malpractice claims following SP encompassing lack of informed consent (6), anosmia (4), septal perforation (2), frontobasal injury (2) and dry nose (2). Trials after LN procedures were associated exclusively with a lesion of the spinal accessory nerve (28), including lack of informed consent in 19 cases. 49 cases (69%) were decided for the defendant, 22 (31%) were decided for the plaintiff with monetary compensation in 7 of 29 AE/TE-trials, 9 of 28 LN-trials and 6 of 14 SP-trials. Lack of informed consent was not registered for AE/TE but LN (11) and SP (2).

CONCLUSION

Complicated cases following TE, TT, ATE, SP and LN are not systematically collected in Germany. It can be assumed, that not every complicated case is published in the medical literature or law journals and therefore not obtainable for scientific research. Alleged medical malpracice is proven for less than 6% before trial stage. Approximately half of all cases result in a plaintiff verdict or settlement at court. Proper documentation of a thourough counselling, examination, indication, informed consent and follow-up assists the surgeon in litigation. An adequate complication management of PTH is essential, including instructions for the patients/parents, instructions for the medical staff and readily available surgical instruments. Successful outcome of life-threatening PTH is widely based on a proper airway management in an interdisciplinary approach. Electrosurgical tonsillectomy techniques were repeatedly labeled as a risk factor for bleeding complications following TE. Institutions should analyse the individual PTH rate on a yearly basis. Contradictory expert opinions and verdicts of the courts concerning spinal accesory nerve lesions following LN are due to a lack of a surgical standard.

Peripheral facial palsy after adenotonsillectomy in children

Transient facial palsy is a rare complication after adenotonsillectomy. In this study, we report two cases who developed unilateral peripheral facial palsy immediately after adenotonsillectomy. The facial palsy in both cases completely recovered in 6 and 3h respectively without any treatment. We assumed the possible mechanism was deep infiltration of the local anesthetics into parapharyngeal space and then the direct action on the facial nerve. Therefore, we suggest three policies to avoid this complication: (1) inject the local anesthetics exactly into peritonsillar space, (2) avoid repeated injections or overdose, (3) slowly and gently inject the local anesthetics.

Comparison of pre-emptive tonsillar lodge infiltration with ropivacaine versus intravenous tramadol in pediatric tonsillectomies: a randomized placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the placebo controlled effect of pre-emptive local infiltration of ropivacaine and intravenous tramadol in postoperative pain and nausea-vomiting in pediatric tonsillectomy cases.

METHODS

90 children at ASA I-II physical status, who are between 2 and 9 years old, underwent tonsillectomy were included to the study. Patients were randomized into one of three study groups. Group I was i.v. saline group (placebo group), Group II was preemptive 1.5 ml 0.75% ropivakain to the tonsil lodge and Group III was preemptive 1mg/kg i.v. tramadol. Hemodynamic parameters and synchronized Maunuksela pain scores were evaluated in the post anesthetic care unit.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, weight, sex and hemodynamic parameters of children included to the study groups. Postoperative nausea vomiting was significantly lower in Group II and pain scores at resting and swallowing are significantly lower than the other study groups. Maunuksela pain scores at 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 9th hours while resting were significantly lower in Group II compared with Groups I and III (p<0.001). The comparison of scores between groups I and III were similar. Maunuksela pain scores during swallowing were significantly lower in Group II compared with Group I and III at 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 21st and 24th hours postoperatively (p<0.001). While comparing Maunuksela pain scores of Groups I and III, significantly lower scores are determined at 2nd and 24th hours in Group III (p<0.001). Analgesic needs were significantly low in Group II at postoperative period (150 ± 30 mg paracetamol) (p<0.05). It was similar in Groups I and III (Group I: 400 ± 40 mg, Group III: 360 ± 40 mg paracetamol).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that peritonsillar ropivacaine infiltration might produce an effective postoperative analgesia probably due to a preventing effect on sensitization of the pain pathways.

Effects of levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia in pediatric tonsillectomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of levobupivacaine hydrochloride, bupivacaine hydrochloride, and saline injections in alleviating posttonsillectomy pain.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and April 2010, we recruited 60 patients (36 male and 24 female) between 2 and 12 years of age into the study. After informed consent was obtained from the parents, patients admitted for tonsillectomy were randomized into 3 groups by means of sealed envelopes. Group 1 (20 patients; mean age, 6.45+/-2.78 years) received 0.9% sodium chloride (saline solution), group 2 (20 patients; mean age, 5.60+/-2.70 years) received 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride, and group 3 (20 patients; mean age, 5.85+/-2.43 years) received 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride infiltrated around each tonsil. Pain was evaluated with McGrath's face scale.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain scores at 1 and 5 hours were similar among the groups (p>0.05). The pain scores in the levobupivacaine group were lower than those in the saline group at 13 hours (p<0.017). The pain scores in the bupivacaine and levobupivacaine groups were significantly lower than those in the saline group from 17 to 21 hours until day 6 (p>0.017). There was no difference between the levobupivacaine and bupivacaine groups (p>0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Local infiltration of levobupivacaine is a relatively safe and effective method and is equivalent to use of bupivacaine for posttonsillectomy pain.

Comparison of peritonsillar levobupivacaine and bupivacaine infiltration for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: placebo-controlled clinical study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.

METHODS

Sixty children undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups before tonsillectomy: peritonsillar infiltrations with 0.25% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group levobupivacaine, n=20), 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group bupivacaine, n=20), and normal saline (group saline, n=20) were applied. Pain was evaluated by using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Choice of additional analgesic was acetaminophen for all patients.

RESULTS

mCHEOPS values at 0th (immediately) and 30th minute after arrival the PACU were lower in both the local anesthetics groups than the saline group (p<0.001, p<0.01 for the group levobupivacaine; p<0.001, p<0.05 for the group bupivacaine, respectively). In addition, mCHEOPS values at 1st hour in the ward was lower in the group bupivacaine when compared to the group saline (p<0.05). Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia required, were also significantly different between the local anesthetic and saline groups (p<0.05 for both local anesthetics groups). Time to first mobilization was shorter in both local anesthetic groups when compared to the saline group (p<0.05 for both local anesthetic groups).

CONCLUSION

Preincisional peritonsillar infiltration with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine before tonsillectomy, are effective than saline, in reducing early post-tonsillectomy pain, where as bupivacaine had slightly longer effect. Compared to saline, with both anesthetic infiltrations, lesser medication for analgesia is required. The clinical trial registration number (Research Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty, Uludag University): 2008-4/36, 19 February 2008.

Topical bupivacaine compared to lidocaine with epinephrine for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the topical administration of bupivacaine hydrochloride, lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine and saline in alleviating post tonsillectomy pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical study.

METHODS

Between November 2008 and March 2009, 60 patients (32 males and 28 females) between ages of 1.5 and 15 years were recruited into the study. After informed consent was obtained from the parents, patients, admitted for tonsillectomy, were randomized into three groups using sealed envelops. Group 1 (20 patients, mean age 5.2±1.7) received topical lidocaine hydrochloride (20 mg/ml) with 0.00125% epinephrine. Group 2 (20 patients, mean age 6±3.7) received topical 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and group 3 (20 patients, mean age 6.7±3.6) received topical saline.

RESULTS

The post-operative pain scores at 1h were similar among the groups (p=0.29). Pain scores in bupivacaine hydrochloride group were significantly lesser than the saline group at 5th, 13th, 17th and 21st hours, until the sixth day (p<0.017). Moreover, pain scores of bupivacaine hydrochloride group were superior to lidocaine hydrochloride group starting at 17 h, until fourth day (p<0.017). Pain scores of lidocaine hydrochloride group were lesser than saline group in the first and fifth days (p<0.017), whereas, there was no significant difference at other times.

CONCLUSION

Topical administration of bupivacaine hydrochloride proved to provide more efficient pain control than both saline and lidocaine without any drug related complication.

Does preincisional injection of levobupivacaine with epinephrine have any benefits for children undergoing tonsillectomy? An intraindividual evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of peritonsillar injection of levobupivacaine with epinephrine in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy, through an intraindividual study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

20 children (age 6-13 years) undergoing elective tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, intraindividual trial. After entubation and just prior to incision, 3 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine with epinephrine was injected into one peritonsillar region while 0.9% saline was being used for the contralateral side. Amount of intraoperative blood loss, duration of tonsillectomy, postoperative pain, otalgia and hemorrhage were assessed for each side separately. Visual analog scale was used for postoperative pain assessment. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure during and after operation were also observed. The follow-up period after surgery was 10 days.

RESULTS

Median visual analog scale values for the levobupivacaine with epinephrine injected side was significantly lower than the saline injected side, during the first postoperative 16h (p<0.05). There were also significant differences between the intraoperative blood losses of the two sides (p<0.05). However; no significant differences were observed with respect to duration of surgery, postoperative otalgia and hemorrhage (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preincisional injection of levobupivacaine with epinephrine decreases early postoperative pain and intraoperative blood loss as well.

Comparison of two different local anaesthetic infiltrations for postoperative pain relief in tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomised, double blind, clinical trial

In previous studies, it was shown that the post-tonsillectomy wound infiltration of bupivacaine can reduce postoperative pain. The objective of this study is to determine whether the postoperative wound infiltration with a mixture of bupivacaine, mepivacaine and adrenaline is more effective than the sole application of bupivacaine. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, control study included 30 patients scheduled for "cold steel" tonsillectomy. All patients obtained post-tonsillectomy infiltration of 6.25 mg bupivacaine alone on one side and 3.75 mg bupivacaine, 25 mg mepivacaine and 0.0125 mg epinephrine on the other side (intra-individual study design). Intake of analgesics and postoperative pain was assessed 0-6 days after surgery by visual analogue scale in inactivity and during swallowing by the nurse staff. Bleeding, dysphagia, pain, aspiration or extraordinary pain sensation were registered by the patient. The pain scores did not differ between the groups. All patients received systemic painkillers; 6 (20%) patients needed intravenous analgesics. Postoperative haemorrhage occurred in two patients without correlation to a certain local anaesthetic. Two patients developed sinus tachycardia for 2.5 min after epinephrine infiltration. Because of cost-effectiveness and complication rates, we recommend only post-tonsillectomy wound infiltration of bupivacaine. The injection should be placed in superficial muscle and connective tissue. A stringent systemic analgesia regime is indispensable for pain relief after tonsillectomy.

The effects of topical levobupivacaine on morbidity in pediatric tonsillectomy patients

OBJECTIVE

To reduce the post-tonsillectomy morbidity by swab soaked with 5 ml levobupivacaine hydroclorur (25 mg/10 ml).

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical study.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind study in group I (30 children, mean age 7.5+/-2.6) we tightly packed swab soaked with 5 ml levobupivacaine hydroclorur (25mg/10 ml) and in group II (21 children, mean age 7.9+/-3.7) we used 5 ml saline swabs into each of the two tonsillar fossae after tonsillectomy for 5 min. We used McGrath's face scale to compare the two groups in respect of pain control.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant pain relieving effect in the levobupivacaine group in the first 24h (p<0.05). But after 24h pain relieving effect of levobupivacaine was not significant (p>0.05). We did not see any serious complications for both groups. Postoperative morbidity mean results (nausea, vomiting, fever, bleeding, halitosis and ear pain) were not statistically different between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Topical levobupivacaine seems to be a safe and easy medication for postoperative pain control in pediatric tonsillectomy patients.

Effect of diathermy on pain and healing in tonsillectomy, compared with other methods of haemostasis: a randomised study

Objective:

To compare three methods of haemostasis used for ‘cold steel’ tonsillectomy, in terms of pain scores and morbidity.

Method and material:

Prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled clinical study. Three haemostasis methods were compared: compression of the tonsillar fossae with gauze packs; bipolar diathermy; and local anaesthesia then pack compression. The outcome measures were pain scores (derived from a visual analogue scale), peri-operative bleeding, and post-operative episodes of blood-stained saliva, consultation rate, tonsillar bed healing and days before return to regular diet. One hundred and five patients were included.

Results:

Peri-operative bleeding was significantly reduced in the local anaesthesia group compared with the other two groups. Delayed post-operative tonsillar bed healing was noted in the diathermy group. No other significant differences were found between the three haemostasis groups, for any other outcome measures. The presence of blood-stained saliva was associated with higher pain scores.

Conclusion:

Diathermy and compression were associated with similar post-tonsillectomy morbidity.

The effects of levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine plus magnesium infiltration on postoperative analgesia and laryngospasm in pediatric tonsillectomy patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of magnesium to levobupivacaine will decrease the postoperative analgesic requirement or not, and to investigate the possible preventive effects on laryngospasm.

METHODS

Seventy-five children undergoing elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy surgery. The drug was prepared as only NaCl 0.9% for the first group (Group S, n=25), levobupivacaine 0.25% for the second group (Group L, n=25), and levobupivacaine 0.25% plus magnesium sulphate 2mg/kg for the third group (Group M, n=25). Pain was recorded at 15th minute, 1st, 4th, 8th, 16th, and 24th hour postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale (mCHEOPS). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed at various time intervals (0-2, 2-6, 6-24h) by numeric rank score. Patients were followed for laryngospasm for 1h in recovery room after extubation. Other complications appeared within 24h postoperatively were recorded.

RESULTS

All postoperative CHEOPS values were lower than control in both groups. Analgesic requirement was decreased significantly in both groups in comparison with control patients, but this requirement was significantly lower in Group M (p<0.05). Although laryngospasm was not observed in Group M, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. PONV was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine plus magnesium infiltration decrease the post-tonsillectomy analgesic requirement. Insignificant preventive effect of low doses of magnesium infiltration on laryngospasm observed in this study needs to be clarified by larger series.

Effects of intramuscular and peritonsillar injection of tramadol before tonsillectomy: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of intramuscular injection and peritonsillar infiltration of tramadol to prevent pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy.

METHODS

In a double-blinded trial, 45 children were randomized into three groups: infiltration anesthesia with tramadol (2 mgkg(-1)) to the peritonsillar area (INF group, n=15), intramuscular analgesia with tramadol (2 mgkg(-1)) (IM group, n=15), and the placebo controls (PL group, n=15). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain assessment, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during and after anesthesia were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean HR values were higher in INF than PL group at 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes of operation (P<0.05). Nine children required analgesics within the first hour after surgery in PL compared to 1 child in INF group (P=0.036). VAS scores on awakening were significantly better in INF than PL group (P=0.015). The difference between IM and PL groups was not significant for any of the parameters.

CONCLUSION

Peritonsillar infiltration with tramadol provided good intraoperative analgesia, less postoperative pain on awakening and lower analgesic requirement within the first hour after surgery.

Comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on postoperative pain after tonsillectomy in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the effects of peritonsillar bupivacaine and ropivacaine infiltration on pain after tonsillectomy in children.

METHOD

Sixty patients were randomly allocated to three groups: pertonsillar infiltration with bupivacaine (group B), ropivacaine (group R) and normal saline (group S). Pain scores with visual analogue scale (VAS) and sedation scores were assessed during postoperative 24h. Choice of additional analgesic was acetaminophen for all patients.

RESULTS

VAS was significantly lower in groups B and R, during the first half hour, while it was lower in group B than those in groups R and S at postoperative second and sixth hours. Time to first analgesic treatment was significantly longer in groups B and R. Total acetaminophen consumption was lower in group B than those in group S. Sedation scores were higher in group B than in groups R and S until postoperative second hour but there were significant difference only at postoperative fifth minutes.

CONCLUSION

Peritonsillar bupivacaine infiltration is, however, insufficient to control postoperative pain, it is more effective than ropivacaine for reducing postoperative analgesic requirement.

Ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.

METHODS

Forty-six children aged 2-12 years, undergoing tonsillectomy were enrolled in the study. Group 1 (n=16) received bupivacaine, group 2 (n=15) received ropivacaine, and a group 3 (control) (n=15) received 9% NaCl (saline) infiltrated around each tonsil. Pain was evaluated using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS) recorded 15 min and 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the demographic data among the groups. The pain scores were similar between the bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups (p>0.05). The pain scores in both analgesia groups were significantly (p<0.05) lower 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively compared to the control group. Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia were also significantly (p<0.05) different between the analgesia and control groups.

CONCLUSION

Local ropivacaine infiltration is a safe and effective method and equivalent to bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain.

Adjuvant local anaesthetics in the epipharyngeal space in day-case adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

CONCLUSION

Mepivacaine applied in the epipharyngeal space as an adjuvant local anaesthetic does not reduce postoperative pain after adenoidectomy in children given high-dose paracetamol preoperatively.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pain-reducing effect of an adjuvant local anaesthetic (mepivacaine) applied in the epipharyngeal space after outpatient adenoidectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Postoperative pain was assessed in 98 children aged 3-10 years using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale. The time between the end of surgery and discharge from hospital was recorded, as well as the need for extra pain medication in addition to the high-dose paracetamol (acetaminophen) that had been given preoperatively. Serum levels of mepivacaine were analysed in 10 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

No difference was seen between the mepivacaine and control groups regarding postoperative pain as estimated using either the VAS or the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale. There were also no differences between the groups concerning the time to discharge from hospital and the need for extra pain medication before discharge. No mepivacaine could be detected in the patients' sera.

Peripheral facial nerve paralysis after peritonsillar infiltration of bupivacaine: a case report

Peritonsillar infiltration of a local anesthetic solution for reduction of posttonsillectomy pain is commonly used although the benefit and complications of this technique have not yet been well established. We report a case of a 4-year-old boy who developed peripheral facial nerve paralysis after perioperative infiltration of bupivacaine and uneventful tonsillectomy. The paralysis was noticed a few minutes after extubation and resolved completely after 8 hours. We assumed this to be caused by the direct action of the local anesthetic agent on the facial nerve.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Children

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. This results in the disruption of normal ventilation and sleep patterns. The symptoms, polysomnographic findings, pathophysiology, and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome are significantly different in children from those seen in adults.

Local bupivacaine-epinephrine infiltration combined with general anesthesia for adult tonsillectomy

CONCLUSION

Use of a solution of bupivacaine (5 mg/ml)-epinephrine (5 microg/ml) (BE) is beneficial in reducing intraoperative bleeding and decreasing the operation time in adult (adeno)tonsillectomy patients.

OBJECTIVE

Pain and intra- and postoperative bleeding are problems associated with tonsillectomy/adenotonsillectomy. In order to make tonsillectomy/adenotonsillectomy better suited to outpatient surgery, solutions to these problems should be found. One possibility may be the combination of local and general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to find out if such a combination is beneficial in tonsillectomy/adenotonsillectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study on 64 adult (adeno)tonsillectomy patients to investigate the possible benefits of infiltrating the peritonsillar space with a BE solution.

RESULTS

In the recovery room, the BE group experienced less pain than a control group infiltrated with saline; subsequently there was no significant difference between the groups concerning pain. The average volume of intraoperative bleeding and the operation time were significantly smaller in the BE group. Postoperative bleeding from the tonsillar fossae occurred in 19% (6/31) of the patients in the BE group and in 18% (6/33) in the saline group.

Does topical lidocaine with adrenaline have an effect on morbidity in pediatric tonsillectomy?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine with adrenaline on post-operative morbidity in pediatric patients after tonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A double blind prospective randomized controlled clinical study.

METHODS

The study is consisting of two groups of pediatric patients following tonsillectomy performed in a university hospital. One group received lidocaine with adrenaline soaked swabs packed in their tonsillar fossae while the control group received saline-soaked swabs. Chi-square and two-tailed unpaired Student's t-tests were used to compare the two independent groups. p<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant pain-relieving effect was seen in the lidocaine with adrenaline group (p>0.05) and also the other post-operative parameters such as nausea, fever, vomiting, odor, bleeding, otalgia and trismus were not statistically different between the two groups based on chi-square analysis (p>0.05). There were no complications associated with lidocaine and adrenaline.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that application of topical lidocaine with adrenaline seems to be a safe and easy medication for local anesthetic use. However, in our study, lidocaine with adrenaline offered no advantage over placebo in the control of post-operative pain and other morbidity related factors following pediatric tonsillectomy. We therefore do not recommend topical application of lidocaine with adrenaline for reducing morbidity in pediatric tonsil surgery.

Modified infiltration technique in tonsillectomy: expanded case report of 25 children

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a modified infiltration technique of anesthetic mixture in order to reduce post-tonsillectomy pain based on histo-anatomic observations and tonsil's innervation detection.

DESIGN

Histo-anatomic, expanded case report.

SETTING

Tertiary care facility in Beirut, Lebanon.

PATIENTS

One hundred and seven patients who underwent tonsillectomy allocated in three groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Histo-anatomic observations were studied in 62 patients (group I). Nerve-stimulator detection was performed in group II (20 children). An expanded case report of 25 children (group III) was conducted using a modified infiltration technique based on the findings of the histo-anatomic observations and nerve detection.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Post-operative pain at 0, 6, 12h and once daily for the 10-day follow-up period, hemodynamic stability, hospital stay, patient satisfaction and analgesics consumption were assessed.

RESULTS

The nerve-stimulator confirmed the histo-anatomic findings by strong contractions of the superior constrictor muscle, soft palate and uvula when the needle is mainly in the middle part of the peritonsillar area where the glossopharyngeal nerve branches predominate. No visual analogue scale median exceeded 1 for any child at any predetermined time interval, only three children (12%) required opoiods during the follow-up period. All children (100%) were discharged the same day, only 4% of parents were unsatisfied. Hemodynamic stability was maintained during pre- and post-operation.

CONCLUSION

This modified technique with minimal volume of anesthetic mixture seems to reduce post-operative pain in tonsillectomy patients; a randomized double-blinded prospective study was designed based on the findings in this initial series of children.

Efficacy of bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain: a study with the intra-individual design

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of postoperative local anesthesia in tonsillectomy patients using an intra-individual study design.

METHODS

Thirty patients aged 5-15 were included in a prospective study. Patients received a local infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine solution on the right tonsillar bed, and received a local infiltration of normal saline on the left tonsillar bed. Patients were asked to localize pain in terms of most disturbing side of the pharynx, on the 1st, 4th, 8th, 16th, 24th hours.

RESULTS

Regarding pain over a 24-h period, there was a significant difference between two sides, after the 8th hour.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative local bupivacaine infiltration in tonsillectomy patients was effective in children.

The effects of dexamethasone, bupivacaine and topical lidocaine spray on pain after tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the administration of bupivacaine hydrochloride, dexamethasone and lidocaine hydrochloride in decreasing post-tonsillectomy pain.

METHODS

Eighty patients were enrolled in the study in ENT Clinic, Firat University, and in ENT Clinic Elaziğ SSK Hospital, Elaziğ (Turkey). Children between 6 and 14 years of age referred to our department for bilateral tonsillectomy for either recurrent tonsillitis or tonsillar hypertrophy. Data from 80 patients were analyzed. The first group had bupivacaine hydrochloride. The second group had dexamethasone infiltrated around each tonsil. The third group was given equal doses of 10% lidocain hydrochloride sprayed on the tonsillectomy fossa four times a day, and a placebo group received 9% NaCl applied to the tonsillar fossa four times a day. Pain scores, determined by visual analog scale, were obtained in the first, third and seventh postoperative days.

RESULTS

Pain scores in the postoperative period were identical in the first, third and seventh postoperative days. According to VAS results the groups were compared on the basis of postoperative pain. In the first postoperative day, the difference between bupivacaine-placebo, dexamethasone-placebo and lidocaine-placebo groups was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). Nevertheless the difference between bupivacaine-dexamethasone, bupivacaine-lidocaine and dexamethasone-lidocaine were not significant (P>0.05). In the third postoperative day, the difference between bupivacaine and lidocaine group found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). In the seventh post-operative day the results of bupivacaine, dexamethasone, lidocaine and placebo groups were similar (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone and Lidocaine nasal aerosol decreased the pain significantly in the first postoperative day when it was compared with the placebo group. These three medicines can be used to reduce pain for children during the postoperative period applied tonsillectomy during the post-operative period. But lidocaine was more preferable, reducing pain in the third postop day better than bupivacaine.

Beneficial effect of low-dose peritonsillar injection of lidocaine-adrenaline before tonsillectomy. A placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Most studies investigating the effect of preincisional injection of local anaesthetic with adrenaline in tonsillectomy have used rather large doses and an inter-individual study design. They are inconclusive regarding the effect on post-tonsillectomy pain but have shown that the peroperative blood loss is reduced. However, side effects to high adrenaline doses are common. In the present study, the effect of injecting a small dose of lidocaine-adrenaline was investigated by using an intra-individual study design.

METHODS

In this randomised double-blind study 52 patients (33 women and 19 men) received unilateral preincisional injection of 3-ml lidocaine-adrenaline before tonsillectomy.

RESULTS

the difference in blood loss was highly significant with a more than 50% reduction in peroperative blood loss in the infiltrated side. Time to achieve haemostasis for one tonsil side was reduced from 6.0 to 4.0 min. No side effects were observed. At the operation day (mean 4.9 h after operation), the visual analogue scale for pain at the side infiltrated with local anaesthetics was 2.78 compared to 4.00 in the control side (P=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose injection of lidocaine-adrenaline before tonsillectomy reduces blood loss and has a small but significant beneficial effect on early postoperative pain. Furthermore our results indicate that operation time is reduced. We therefore recommend subcapsular injection of 3 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1/200.000 adrenaline under each tonsil before tonsillectomy.

The Effects of a Preoperative Steroid/Anesthetic Injection on Post-Tonsillectomy Pain

We conducted a placebo-controlled, single-blind study to determine the efficacy of a local preoperative injection of a steroid/anesthetic combination in preventing post-tonsillectomy pain. We randomized 21 adults to receive either triamcinolone/bupivacaine on the left side and saline on the right or vice versa. Injections were administered in the area of the tonsillar pillars following intubation and prior to tonsillectomy. Based on the “generalized estimating equations” model of statistical analysis, we found no significant difference in the degree of postoperative pain between the active-treatment and control sides.

Pre-Operative Versus Post-Operative Peritonsillar Infiltration with Local Anesthetic on Post-Tonsillectomy Pain

To compare the efficacy of either preoperative or postoperative peritonsillar infiltration of local anesthetic upon posttonsillectomy pain, 70patients aged 15/40 years scheduled for elective tonsillectomy under general anesthesia were divided into three groups. Six patients were excluded for failure to complete the postoperative data, two patients had post-operative bleeding and two patients developed otitis media on the second day postoperatively.

Twenty patients received peritonsillar infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine, twenty received 0.9% saline and a third group of twenty had peritonsillar infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine after completion of surgery but before being awakened from anesthesia. Significant changes occurred with bupivacaine infiltration in reducing pain during the first 24 hours after surgery.

It is concluded that preoperative and postoperative blocking of nociceptive impulses reduces postoperative pain but causes no reduction in the intake of analgesics. It is further suggested that the timing of peritonsillar infiltration with bupivacaine is not of clinical importance and does not affect the quality of postoperative analgesia in a patient undergoing tonsillectomy.

Adjuvant therapies in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE

To review adjuvant therapies used in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy, addressing several areas of controversy.

STUDY DESIGN

Review.

METHODS

Studies of perioperative injection of local anesthetic agents, postoperative use of antibiotics, perioperative use of intravenously administered steroids, and pain management in adenotonsillectomy were reviewed.

RESULTS

Controversy exists about all adjuvant therapies discussed. Injection of local anesthetics may reduce pain and bleeding but has been associated with several serious side effects. Most patients receive antibiotics postoperatively, but no consensus exists about the agent of choice or duration of its use and there is concern about development of bacterial resistance. A meta-analysis found that children given steroids perioperatively were less likely to have an episode of emesis, but the analysis could not assess the role of steroids in pain control because of a lack of data. The effectiveness of acetaminophen alone compared with acetaminophen plus a narcotic for analgesia after adenotonsillectomy is controversial.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant therapies have many possible benefits for children undergoing adenotonsillectomy, but otolaryngologists must make careful choices about these treatments.

Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Pain relief after tonsillectomy is an important part of post-operative management. Sometimes local anaesthetics are administed to the tonsillar region, but their effectiveness in relieving pain has not been formally assessed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pre- and post-operative local anaesthesia for pain reduction following tonsillectomy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and the Oxford Pain Database. Reference lists from identified publications, including those in non-English language publications, were scanned. Date of the most recent search was September 1998.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of adults and/or children undergoing tonsillectomy alone with local anaesthetic (a) injected into the tonsillar region immediately prior to removal of the tonsils (b) injected into the tonsillar region after removal of the tonsils (c) sprayed or otherwise applied to the tonsillar region after removal of the tonsils Outcome measures included the reduction in demand for post-operative analgesia, both in terms of time elapsed to request for first analgesia and of the total amount of analgesia used.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All three reviewers extracted data independently and assessed trials for quality. Four authors were contacted to obtain information on either the method of randomisation or the type of intervention used.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty trials were initially identified but only six trials met the inclusion criteria. These were all published in the English language literature between 1989 and 1997. Trials were excluded because procedures in addition to tonsillectomy were undertaken, inadequate randomisation techniques were used or because group sizes were inadequate. Of the six included studies, five involved local anaesthetic injection and one application of local anaesthetic spray. These studies used validated pain scores and measurement of supplemental analgesic intake for assessment of pain. However, some studies also included inappropriate, possibly post-hoc, outcome measures such as 'global pain scores' which may have resulted in bias. No included study showed a significant difference between intervention and control, other than for outcome measures which were felt to be inappropriate, such as the one mentioned above.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that the use of perioperative local anaesthetic in patients undergoing tonsillectomy improves post-operative pain control. The trials identified were of small size and several involved the perioperative co-administration of intravenous opiates which may have masked any beneficial effect of the local anaesthetic. Further randomised controlled trials are necessary.

A prospective randomized double-blind trial of fibrin glue for pain and bleeding after tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVES

The notable morbidity of tonsillectomy includes considerable postoperative pain and a rate of postoperative bleeding that have remained largely uninfluenced by modern surgical techniques or medication. Fibrin glue is known to have a hemostatic effect in some settings, and there is research suggesting it may also reduce postoperative pain. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of fibrin glue on pain and bleeding after tonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized double-blind study was performed on 50 consecutive adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy for chronic tonsillitis.

METHODS

After removal of both tonsils the tonsillar fossa randomly assigned to the treatment protocol was coated with fibrin glue. The other side was left unaltered. The patient was then monitored for postoperative bleeding and wound healing, and a patient-based pain assessment instrument was used to evaluate symptoms every 8 hours for 10 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Detailed evaluation of the pain scores allowed the authors to create a pain profile for what the typical patient experiences over the first 10 postoperative days, as well as during the course of a single day. The pain remains relatively constant for the first 7 days and begins to decrease only on the eighth postoperative day. During a single day there is increased pain in the morning compared with noon and evening. However, no statistically significant difference was detected in postoperative pain, bleeding, or healing between the wounds treated with fibrin glue and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-based pain evaluation data should aid the physician in preoperative outcome counselling and targeted prescription of pain medication. However, contrary to previous indications, the authors cannot substantiate a significant beneficial effect of fibrin glue in postoperative pain control. Furthermore, we did not find its action as a hemostatic agent clinically applicable in this setting, and thus find no indication for the routine use of fibrin glue in tonsillectomy.

The role of bupivacaine in early postoperative pain control after lumbar decompression

OBJECT

The authors studied the effect of immediate postoperative administration of bupivacaine in patients who underwent a lumbar decompressive procedure.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind trial, 50 patients who underwent elective lumbar decompression after induction of general anesthetic received a postoperative bilateral paravertebral 40-ml intramuscular application of either saline (0.9%) or bupivacaine (0.25%). For delivering morphine, both groups used a patient-controlled analgesia system for 24 hours postsurgery. Pain scores, 10-cm visual analog scale scores, and morphine consumption were similar between groups with no significant differences (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of subgroup analysis suggested strongly that perioperative administration of methylprednisolone in a sustained-release preparation was associated with a reduction in postoperative pain (p<0.05).