Comparison of two different TSH-receptor antibody assays: A clinical practice study

Background

Graves' disease (GD) is caused by the production of TSH-receptor (TSHR) stimulating auto-antibodies. Over the years various TSHR-antibody (TRAb) detection assays have been developed. Most clinical laboratories use competitive TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assays, which measure the total amount of stimulating and blocking auto-antibodies. Selective detection of TSHR stimulating auto-antibodies (TSI) was previously only possible with functional cell-based bioassays. However, more recently an automated bridge-based binding assay to more specifically measure TSI has become available. The aim of our study was to compare the third-generation automated competitive immunoassay (TBII) with the automated bridge immunoassay (TSI) in clinical practice in an academic thyroid expert center.

Methods

A retrospective study in 356 patients with Graves' disease, Graves orbitopathy (GO), and other (thyroid) disease treated in an academic thyroid center was performed. All samples were analyzed for TBII and TSI. For both assays, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PVV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated using different cut-offs for negativity.

Results

Using the provided cut-off, the overall sensitivity appeared similar between TBII and TSI, but TSI showed higher overall specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic odds ratio. Using two or three times the cut-off for negativity resulted in a decrease in sensitivity, but an increase in specificity and PPV, which was most pronounced for the TBII-assay. Analysis in a subgroup of newly diagnosed treatment naïve GD/GO patients also revealed overall favorable results for the TSI-assay. Increasing the cut-off for negativity resulted in increased specificity for both assays, with similar results using two or three times the cut-off. Most patients with concordant positive results for TBII and TSI suffered from GD or GD + GO (n = 110, 95.6 %), while patients negative for both TBII and TSI mostly suffered from other (thyroid) disease (n = 143, 77.3 %). From patients with positive TBII but negative TSI only 42.1 % had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 57.9 % (n = 22) had other (thyroid) disease. In contrast, 88.9 % of patients with positive TSI but negative TBII had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 11.1 % (n = 2) had other (thyroid) disease.

Conclusion

In our academic thyroid center, the diagnostic performance of the TSI-assay outperformed the TBII-assay. Using a higher cut-off value for negativity can be helpful in assessing clinical relevance.

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin and thyrotropin receptor antibodies for Graves' disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) and thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) diagnostic performance for Graves' disease (GD) and determine clinical cut-off value for diagnosing GD.

METHODS

Of 1369 retrospectively enrolled subjects, 1364 had a definitive diagnosis of untreated GD (GD-UT, n = 87); treated GD (GD-T, n = 206); autoimmune thyroid disease (AIT, n = 241); thyroid nodules (TN, n = 677); subacute thyroiditis (ST, n = 28); healthy subjects (HS, n = 125); other diseases with serological hyperthyroidism (n = 5) and were grouped into the following: UT-GD and control groups (AIT, TN, ST, and HS); and UT-GD and non-GD hyperthyroidism groups. Diagnostic performance of TSI and TRAb was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and optimal clinical cut-off value was determined using maximization of Youden index.

RESULTS

TRAb AUC and clinical cut-off value for diagnosing GD were 0.981 and 1.245 IU/L (sensitivity, 96.6%; specificity, 97.1%; positive predictive value [PPV], 71.8%; negative predictive value [NPV], 99.9%; positive likelihood ratio [PLR], 33.31; negative likelihood ratio [NLR, 0.035), respectively, for the GD-UT and control groups. Those for TSI were 0.992 and 0.467 IU/L (sensitivity 98.8%; specificity, 96.4%; PPV, 68.8%; NPV, 99.9%; PLR, 27.472; NLR, 0.011). Those for TRAb in GD-UT and non-GD hyperthyroidism groups were 0.923 and 1.78 IU/L (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 89.1%; PPV, 93%; NPV, 87.5%; PLR, 8.44; NLR, 0.089), respectively. For TSI, these were 0.92 and 0.545 IU/L (sensitivity, 97.7%; specificity, 83.6%; PPV, 90.4%; NPV, 95.8%; PLR27.472, NLR, 0.011), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TSI diagnostic performance for GD was excellent and had better sensitivity than TRAb.

In Graves' disease, thyroid autoantibodies and ultrasound features correlate with distinctive histological features

PURPOSE

Laboratory, imaging, and pathological features of Graves' disease (GD), although well characterized, have been barely correlated each other. Aim of the study was to link laboratory and ultrasound characteristics of GD with its pathological features.

METHODS

We correlated laboratory and ultrasound data at the time of diagnosis in 28 consecutive GD patients who underwent thyroidectomy with their pathological features, i.e., lymphocytic infiltration and follicular hyperplasia (both classified as mild or severe).

RESULTS

Thyroid volume correlated positively with the levels of FT4 (P = 0.002, r² = 0.42), FT3 (P = 0.011, r² = 0.22), autoantibodies to thyroglobulin (TgAbs) (P = 0.016, r² = 0.32), autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase (TPOAbs) (P = 0.011, r² = 0.34) and the extent of lymphocytic infiltration (P = 0.006 comparing mild to severe lymphocytic infiltration) but not with the levels of autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor (TRAbs) and to follicular hyperplasia. Compared to subjects with mild lymphocytic infiltration, those with severe lymphocytic infiltration showed higher levels of TgAbs (316 vs 0.0 IU/mL, P < 0.0001) and TPOAbs (295 IU/mL vs 14 IU/mL, P < 0.0001) and similar levels of TRAbs (7.5 vs 13 IU/mL, P = 0.68). Compared to patients with mild, those with severe follicular hyperplasia had similar levels of TgAbs (76 vs 30 IU/mL, P = 0.31) and TPOAbs (251 IU/mL vs 45 IU/mL, P = 0.26) but higher levels of TRAbs (39 vs 7.2 IU/mL, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In GD, TgAbs and TPOAbs levels correlate with the extent of lymphocytic infiltration, TRAbs levels with the degree of follicular hyperplasia. Thyroid volume, the main factor influencing the severity of hyperthyroidism, is related to lymphocytic infiltration and not to follicular hyperplasia.

Clinical evaluation of an automated TSI bridge immunoassay in the diagnosis of Graves' disease and its relationship to the degree of hyperthyroidism

BACKGROUND

The rapid and accurate detection of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibodies has always been an urgent need for the clinical diagnosis and management of Graves' disease (GD). We aimed to evaluate the use of an automated thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bridge immunoassay in the diagnosis of GD and to analyze the relationship between TSI and the degree of hyperthyroidism.

METHODS

A total of 227 new-onset GD patients, 29 Hashimoto thyroiditis, 43 non-autoimmune thyroid diseases and 37 euthyroid controls were consecutively recruited. All participants accepted the measurement of their serum thyroid function and thyroid-associated antibodies, including TSI being measured by an Immulite 2000 bridge immunoassay and TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) being measured by a third-generation Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The quantitative consistency between the TSI and TRAb detection methods was analyzed by using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots. The diagnostic performance for GD was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among 227 GD patients (174 females and 53 males, with a mean age of 39 years), the quantitative TSI was positively correlated with TRAb (r = 0.8099). According to the cut-off values proposed by the manufacturers (TSI: 0.55 IU/L, TRAb: 1.75 IU/L), the positive rates of TSI and TRAb in new-onset GD patients were 96.92% and 95.15%, respectively. Both TSI and TRAb levels positively correlated with FT₄ levels (TSI: r = 0.243, TRAb: r = 0.317; all P < 0.001) and FT₃ levels (TSI: r = 0.288, TRAb: r = 0.360; all P < 0.001) in new-onset GD patients. The ROC analysis showed that the optimal TSI cut-off value was 0.577 IU/L for GD diagnosis in this Chinese population, with a sensitivity of 96.92% and a specificity of 97.25%, respectively. The optimal TRAb cut-off value of was 1.38 IU/L, with a sensitivity of 96.92% and a specificity of 99.08%. There were no significant differences between the cut-off values obtained through the ROC analysis and those provided by the manufacturer for both TSI and TRAb when calculating their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing GD. Among the 8 newly diagnosed GD cases with discordant qualitative antibody results, TSI was more likely than TRAb to match the clinical diagnosis of GD (6 TSI-positive vs. 2 TRAb-positive patients).

CONCLUSION

The automated TSI bridge immunoassay was positively correlated with thyroxine levels in new-onset GD patients and was more likely to be consistent with the clinical diagnosis of GD than with that of TRAb. The positive Immulite 2000 TSI cut-off value of 0.577 IU/L for GD diagnosis in the Chinese population were close to the value recommended by the manufacturer.

Anti-TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb): Comparison of two third generation automated immunoassays broadly used in clinical laboratories and results interpretation

Graves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-replete populations. It is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the TSHR (TRAb). Although the diagnostic is mainly clinical, measuring TRAb improves accuracy and provides valuable prognostic information. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two of the most widely used immunoassays i.e., EliA™ anti-TSH-R and Elecsys^® anti-TSH-R. We have carried out a comparative study measuring TRAb by the two immunoassays in consecutive sera samples referred to the laboratory for TRAb measurement. Autoantibodies were measured in all samples in parallel by the two techniques. The two techniques were highly concordant as demonstrated by a Cohen’s kappa of 0.82. At the manufacturer recommended cut-off, sensitivity of Elecsys^® TRAb test was higher (100% vs. 96.6%), while specificity of the EliA™ TRAb test was higher (99.4% vs. 95.3%). In most patients TRAb are detected by any of two tests which are both well suited for Clinical Laboratories use. However, a higher specificity may constitute an advantage for measurement used not for screening but for diagnostic purposes, as anti-TSH-R is.

Mistaken Identity: The Role of Autoantibodies in Endocrine Disease

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune endocrine diseases can be thought of as a case of mistaken identity. The immune system mistakenly attacks one's own cells, as if they were foreign, which typically results in endocrine gland hypofunction and inadequate hormone production. Type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune thyroid disorders (Hashimoto and Graves diseases) are the most common autoimmune endocrine disorders, while conditions such as Addison disease are encountered less frequently. Autoantibody production can precede clinical presentation, and their measurement may aid verification of an autoimmune process and guide appropriate treatment modalities.

CONTENT

In this review, we discuss type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and Addison disease, emphasizing their associated autoantibodies and methods for clinical detection. We will also discuss efforts to standardize measurement of autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune endocrine disease progression may take months to years and detection of associated autoantibodies may precede clinical onset of disease. Although detection of autoantibodies is not necessary for diagnosis, they may be useful to verify an autoimmune process.

Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid-stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves' disease

Objective

To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two immunoassays for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD), the Immulite thyroid‐stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), and Elecsys Anti‐TSH receptor (TSHR) assay.

Methods

Precision and analytical measurement range were assessed using pooled samples of patients. The comparison between the two methods was evaluated using 579 clinical samples, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using the final diagnosis as reference. Clinical sensitivity and specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the two tests.

Results

The repeatability and intermediate imprecision coefficient of variation (CV%) of the TSI assay were 3.8% and 4.1% at 0.95 IU/L, and 3.5% and3.6% at 19.5 IU/L, respectively. The assays were linear over a range 0.27–38.5 IU/L. There was a high correlation between the quantitative results of the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.930). The cut‐off value obtained by ROC analysis for TSI assay was 0.7 IU/L with sensitivity of 93.7% and specificity of 85.1%. An overall qualitative agreement of 91.5% between two methods was observed. Among 44 patients with discordant qualitative results, the TSI assay provided more satisfactory results consistent with clinical diagnoses.

Conclusion

The TSI assay showed excellent analytical performance and provided a high PPV for GD.

Diagnostic accuracy of Immulite® TSI immunoassay for thyroid-associated orbitopathy in patients with recently diagnosed Graves' hyperthyroidism

PURPOSE

The Immulite® thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) immunoassay is a relatively new commercial assay that has shown good diagnostic accuracy in Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH). However, its clinical utility in thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) is less clear. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Immulite® TSI immunoassay for TAO and investigate the associations between TSI and other clinical measures.

METHODS

One hundred and forty patients that had been diagnosed with GH within the previous 12 months were recruited. Identification and grading of TAO were performed at enrolment and serum samples were analysed using the Immulite® TSI immunoassay.

RESULTS

Of the 140 participants recruited, 75 (53.6%) had TAO. Age, sex and time since GH diagnosis were similar between those with and without TAO (p ≥ 0.300). TSI level tended to decrease with increasing time from GH diagnosis (Spearman's ρ - 0.28, 95% CI - 0.43, - 0.12). TSI levels were higher among those with than those without TAO (median 4.0 vs. 2.7 IU/L, respectively, p = 0.037). There was no correlation between TSI level and inflammatory index score (ρ = 0.14, 95% CI - 0.03, 0.30) or clinical severity (p = 0.527) among those with TAO. TSI level showed poor diagnostic accuracy for TAO (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.60, 95% CI 0.51, 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Immulite® TSI level was higher in the presence of TAO, it showed poor diagnostic accuracy and no correlation with clinical markers of TAO severity or activity.

Clinical efficacy of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin detection for diagnosing Graves' disease and predictors of responsiveness to methimazole

BACKGROUND

As thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins (TSI) are a sign of Graves' disease (GD), measuring TSI titers is becoming increasingly important for GD diagnosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a new fully automated TSI immunoassay (Immulite™ TSI assay) in GD patients and compared it to the third generation thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) electrochemiluminescence assay (Elecsys Anti-TSHR assay). Additionally, clinical characteristics associated with responsiveness to methimazole in patients with newly diagnosed GD were preliminarily explored.

METHODS

This study involved 324 subjects, comprising patients with untreated GD (GD-UT), Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) patients, GD patients who had been treated for > 12 months (GD-T), autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT) patients, and healthy subjects (HS). The Immulite™ TSI and Elecsys Anti-TSHR assay were performed on all samples. According to their responsiveness to methimazole, the GD-UT patients were divided into rapid and slow responder groups, and their clinical characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of GD-UT patients showed that the optimal TSI cut-off value was 0.57 IU/L. Logistic regression revealed that age and initial FT4 and TSI levels in the middle-dose methimazole group were related to a rapid response, while the initial FT4 level, but not TSI, in the high-dose group was also associated with a rapid response.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical diagnostic performance of the Immulite™ TSI assay for diagnosing GD was comparable to that of the Elecsys Anti-TSHR assay. The initial FT4 and TSI levels can be used as predictors of the responsiveness to methimazole in patients with newly diagnosed GD.

Predicting the Course of Graves' Orbitopathy Using Serially Measured TSH-Receptor Autoantibodies by Automated Binding Immunoassays and the Functional Bioassay

The aim of the study was to investigate the use of serial measurements of TSH-receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) with the newest available assay technology to predict the course of Graves' Orbitopathy (GO) during the first 24 months from disease onset. Serial serum samples from patients with GO (103 mild/135 severe) were collected between 2007 and 2017 and retrospectively analyzed. The course of GO were classified into mild/severe 12 months after manifestation (severe: NOSPECS≥5; mild<5). TRAb were measured with automated binding immunoassays (IU/l): TRAb Elecsys (Cobas, Roche), TRAb bridge assay (IMMULITE, Siemens), and a cell-based bioassay (percent of specimen to reference ratio - SRR%) (Thyretain, Quidel). Variable cut off levels of measured TRAb were calculated at specificity of 90% from receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis for several timepoints during the course of GO. To select one: 5-8 months after first GO symptoms, which is the timepoint for usual referals for treatment mild course could be predicted at cut offs of 1.5 IU/l (Elecsys), 0.8 IU/l (Immulite) and 402% SRR (Thyretain) and the risc of severe course has to be anticipated if TRAb are above 11.6 IU/l (Elecsys), 6.5 IU/l (Thyretain), and 714% SRR (Thyretain). The Thyretain bioassay showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity (using the commercial cut off's) over the entire follow up period. TRAb measurements during the 24-month follow up of GO provide added value to the GO clinical activity and severity scores and should be used especially in the event of an unclear decision-taking situation with regard to therapy.

Evaluation of the application of TSH receptor stimulating autoantibodies and the optimization of detection strategy in Graves' disease

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the use of thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) assay to optimize the detection strategy for Graves' disease.

METHODS

Five hundred and forty-four well characterized serum samples from the Clinical Laboratory of Shanghai Tongren Hospital were collected from August 2019 to April 2020. The serum samples were obtained from 52 untreated GD patients, 155 treated GD patients, 83 patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 70 patients with thyroid nodules, 83 patients with thyroid cancer, and 101 healthy subjects. All samples were evaluated by both TSI assay and TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) assay. Moreover, 23 patients without a distinct thyroid disease diagnosis at the first visit were monitored for 6 months to make a final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The clinical sensitivity of the TSI and TRAb assays was 98.10% and 94.20% respectively, while the clinical specificity was 92.30% and 96.70% respectively. ROC plot analysis based on sera of UT-GD (newly diagnosed GD patients) revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.974 for the TSI assay. The best cutoff value was 0.58 IU/l (98.0% of sensitivity, 92.8% of specificity). The AUC for the TRAb assay was 0.961. Furthermore, combining TSI and TRAb results, the area under the curve was 0.981. In a pilot study of 23 patients with an uncertain initial diagnosis, the follow-up results showed the clinical diagnosis of 22 out of 23 cases were resolved in agreement with the results obtained by the TSI assay, and one case matched the result obtained by TRAb assay.

CONCLUSION

The TSI assay presents very promising analytical characteristics and could be adopted in clinical practice to improve GD diagnosis. The TSI assay might be better than TRAb assay in initial differential diagnosis of GD from other thyroid diseases.

Predicting the Relapse of Hyperthyroidism in Treated Graves' Disease with Orbitopathy by Serial Measurements of TSH-Receptor Autoantibodies

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the new TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) assays to predict remission or relapse of hyperthyroidism in patients with Graves' disease (GD) and Graves' orbitopathy (GO). TRAbs were measured retrospectively in sera from a cohort of GD patients with GO (n=117; remission n=38 and relapse n=79-Essen GO biobank) with automated binding immunoassays: TRAb Elecsys (Cobas Roche) and TRAb bridge assay (IMMULITE, Siemens), and the TSAb (thyroid stimulating Ab) cell-based bioassay (Thyretain, Quidel Corp.). To identify relapse risk/remission of hyperthyroidism patients were followed up at least 10 months after the end of antithyroid drug therapy (ATD) therapy. ROC plot analysis was performed to calculate cut-off levels of TRAb and TSAb for prediction of relapse and remission of hyperthyroidism. Cut-off serum levels are provided for timepoints around 3, 6, 10, and 15 months after the beginning of ATD. Repeated measurements of TRAb increase the rate of relapses predictions to 60% (Elecsys), 70% (IMMULITE), and 55% (Thyretain). Patients with remission have consistently TRAb levels below the cut off for relapse in repeated measurements. The cell-based bioassay was the most sensitive - and continued to be positive during follow up [at 15 months: 90% vs. 70% (IMMULITE) and 65% (Elecsys)]. Identification of relapsing hyperthyroidism is possible with automated immunoassays and cell-based bioassay especially with serial TRAb measurements during the course of ATD therapy. Patient who need eye surgery may profit from an early decision towards definitive treatment.

The role of laboratory medicine in the diagnosis of the hyperthyroidism

Hyperthyroidism is a clinical condition characterized by inappropriately high synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormones by the thyroid gland. It has multiple aetiologies, manifestations and potential therapies. Graves' disease is the most common form of hyperthyroidism, due to the production of autoantibodies against thyrotropin receptor, capable of over-stimulating thyroid function. A reliable diagnosis of hyperthyroidism can be established on clinical grounds, followed by the evaluation of serum thyroid function tests (thyrotropin first and then free thyroxine, adding the measurement of free triiodothyronine in selected specific situations). The recent guidelines of both the American and European Thyroid Associations have strongly recommended the measurement of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies for the accurate diagnosis and management of Graves' disease. If autoantibody test is negative, a radioiodine uptake should be performed. Considering the most recent laboratory improvements, binding assays can be considered the best first solution for the measurement of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies in diagnosis and management of overt cases of Graves' disease. In fact, they have a satisfactory clinical sensitivity and specificity (97.4% and 99.2%, respectively) being performed in clinical laboratories on automated platforms together with the other thyroid function tests. In this setting, the bioassays should be reserved for fine and complex diagnoses and for particular clinical conditions where it is essential to document the transition from stimulating to blocking activity or vice versa (e.g. pregnancy and post-partum, related thyroid eye disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis with extrathyroidal manifestations, unusual cases after LT4 therapy for hypothyroidism or after antithyroid drug treatment for Graves' disease). Undoubtedly, technological advances will help improve laboratory diagnostics of hyperthyroidism. Nevertheless, despite future progress, the dialogue between clinicians and laboratory will continue to be crucial for an adequate knowledge and interpretation of the laboratory tests and, therefore, for an accurate diagnosis and correct management of the patient.

Interconversion of Plasma Free Thyroxine Values from Assay Platforms with Different Reference Intervals Using Linear Transformation Methods

Clinicians often encounter thyroid function tests (TFT) comprising serum/plasma free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) measured using different assay platforms during the course of follow-up evaluations which complicates reliable comparison and interpretation of TFT changes. Although interconversion between concentration units is straightforward, the validity of interconversion of FT4/TSH values from one assay platform to another with different reference intervals remains questionable. This study aims to establish an accurate and reliable methodology of interconverting FT4 by any laboratory to an equivalent FT4 value scaled to a reference range of interest via linear transformation methods. As a proof-of-concept, FT4 was simultaneously assayed by direct analog immunoassay, tandem mass spectrometry and equilibrium dialysis. Both linear and piecewise linear transformations proved relatively accurate for FT4 inter-scale conversion. Linear transformation performs better when FT4 are converted from a more accurate to a less accurate assay platform. The converse is true, whereby piecewise linear transformation is superior to linear transformation when converting values from a less accurate method to a more robust assay platform. Such transformations can potentially apply to other biochemical analytes scale conversions, including TSH. This aids interpretation of TFT trends while monitoring the treatment of patients with thyroid disorders.

Clinical diagnostic performance of a fully automated TSI immunoassay vs. that of an automated anti‑TSHR immunoassay for Graves' disease: a Chinese multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Both thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins immunoassay (TSI IA) and thyrotrophin receptor antibody immunoassay (TRAb IA) are commonly used for the diagnosis of Graves' disease (GD). The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical diagnostic performance of these two methods.

METHODS

Sera were obtained from 1103 subjects presenting a variety of clinical conditions from three centers: 100 subjects with untreated GD, 200 with treated GD, 62 with autoimmune thyroid disease(AIT), 216 with other thyroid diseases (OTHER-T), 214 with non-thyroid autoimmune diseases (NTAD), 191 with other diseases (OD), and 120 healthy subjects (HS). Both TSI and TRAb IAs were performed for all 1013 serum samples. Bioassay was performed for 86 samples whose TSI results were inconsistent the TRAb assay results.

RESULTS

Comparing untreated GD patients with the control groups (AIT, NTAD, OTHER-T, OD, and HS) resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.992 for the TSI IA and 0.989 for the TRAb IA with no statistically significant difference observed between these AUC values (P = 0.2733). The best TSI CDP (clinical decision point) value was 0.42 IU/L. The differences in sensitivity (100% vs. 95%, P = 0.7991) and specificity (97.1% vs. 97.6%, P = 0.9426) between the TSI and TRAb IA were not statistically significant. TSI IA had a higher agreement with the TSI bioassay than TRAb IA.

CONCLUSION

The clinical diagnostic performance of the TSI IA for diagnosing Graves' disease was very similar to that of the TRAb IA. TSI IA can be used to diagnose GD in the Chinese.

Current controversies in the management of Graves' hyperthyroidism

Introduction: The management of Graves' disease centers on the use of effective and well-established therapies, namely thionamide antithyroid drugs, radioactive iodine, and thyroidectomy. Optimal treatment strategies are however controversial and vary significantly across centers.Areas covered: This review addresses specific controversies in Graves' disease management including the choice of primary therapy, the approach to women planning pregnancy, and optimal strategies for antithyroid drug and radioiodine therapy.Expert opinion: Important considerations in choosing therapy include treatment efficacy, adverse effects, patient convenience, and resource settings. Recent data suggest that early and effective control of hyperthyroidism is key to improving cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Studies addressing cancer risk in radioiodine-treated patients face methodological challenges and require clarification in appropriately designed studies. Remission rates with antithyroid drugs are comparable when thionamides are used alone (titration-regimen) or in combination with levothyroxine (block and replace) and can be optimized by extending treatment for at least 12-18 months. Fixed and calculated radioiodine activity regimens are both effective but entail a trade-off between convenience and precision in the administered activity. Optimal preconception strategies are still evolving but ablative treatment in advance of pregnancy offers the most pragmatic means of reducing adverse effects of hyperthyroidism in subsequent pregnancy.

Applications of Mass Spectrometry for Clinical Diagnostics: The Influence of Turnaround Time

This critical review discusses how the need for reduced clinical turnaround times has influenced chemical instrumentation. We focus on the development of modern mass spectrometry (MS) and its application in clinical diagnosis. With increased functionality that takes advantage of novel front-end modifications and computational capabilities, MS can now be used for non-traditional clinical analyses, including applications in clinical microbiology for bacteria differentiation and in surgical operation rooms. We summarize here recent developments in the field that have enabled such capabilities, which include miniaturization for point-of-care testing, direct complex mixture analysis via ambient ionization, chemical imaging and profiling, and systems integration.

Comparison of Five TSH-Receptor Antibody Assays in Graves' disease: results from an observational pilot study

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and relapse prediction in Graves' disease influences treatment. We assessed the abilities of four TSH-receptor antibody tests [TRAb] and one cyclic adenosine monophosphate bioassay to predict relapse of Graves' disease.

METHODS

Observational study investigating patients presenting with Graves' disease at a Swiss hospital endocrine referral center or an endocrine outpatient clinic. Main outcomes were diagnosis and relapse of Graves' disease after stop of anti-thyroid drugs. We used Cox regression to study associations of TRAb levels with relapse risk and calculated c-statistics [AUC] to assess discrimination. Blood draws took place as close as possible to treatment initiation.

RESULTS

AUCs ranged from 0.90 (TSAb Biossay by RSR) to 0.97 (IMMULITE TSI by Siemens). Highest sensitivity (94.0%) was observed for IMMULITE TSI and RSR TRAb Fast, while the greatest specificity (97.9%) was found with the EliA anti-TSH-R (by Thermo Fisher). In Cox regression analysis comparing the highest versus the lower quartiles, the highest hazard ratio [HR] for relapse was found for BRAHMS TRAK (by Thermo Fisher) (2.98, 95% CI 1.13-7.84), IMMULITE TSI (2.40, 95% CI 0.91-6.35), EliA anti-TSH-R (2.05, 95% CI 0.82-5.10), RSR Fast TRAb (1.80, 95% CI 0.73-4.43), followed by RSR STIMULATION (1.18, 95% CI 0.46-2.99). Discrimination analyses showed respective AUCs of 0.68, 0.65, 0.64, 0.64, and 0.59.

CONCLUSION

The assays tested had good diagnostic power and relapse risk prediction with few differences among the new assays. Due to the small sample size and retrospective design with possible selection bias, our data need prospective validation.

Primary therapy of Graves' disease and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a linked-record cohort study

BACKGROUND

Graves' disease is routinely treated with antithyroid drugs, radioiodine, or surgery, but whether the choice of initial therapy influences long-term outcomes is uncertain. We evaluated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality according to the method and effectiveness of primary therapy in Graves' disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with hyperthyroidism, diagnosed between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2013, from a thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-receptor antibody (TRAb) test register in south Wales, UK, and imported their clinical data into the All-Wales Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank (Swansea University, Swansea, UK). Patients with Graves' disease, defined by positive TRAb tests, were selected for the study, and their clinical data were linked with outcomes in SAIL. We had no exclusion criteria. Patients were matched by age and sex to a control population (1:4) in the SAIL database. Patients were grouped by treatment within 1 year of diagnosis into the antithyroid drug group, radioiodine with resolved hyperthyroidism group (radioiodine group A), or radioiodine with unresolved hyperthyroidism group (radioiodine group B). We used landmark Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models to analyse the association of treatment with the primary outcome of all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, ischaemic stroke, or death) with the landmark set at 1 year after diagnosis. We analysed the association between outcomes and concentration of TSH using Cox regression and outcomes and free thyroxine (FT4) concentration using restricted cubic-spline regression models.

FINDINGS

We extracted patient-level data on 4189 patients (3414 [81·5%] females and 775 [18·5%] males) with Graves' disease and 16 756 controls (13 656 [81·5%] females and 3100 [18·5%] males). In landmark analyses, 3587 patients were in the antithyroid drug group, 250 were in radioiodine group A, 182 were in radioiodine group B. Patients had increased all-cause mortality compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR] 1·22, 95% CI 1·05-1·42). Compared with patients in the antithyroid drug group, mortality was lower among those in radioiodine group A (HR 0·50, 95% CI 0·29-0·85), but not for those in radioiodine group B (HR 1·51, 95% CI 0·96-2·37). Persistently low TSH concentrations at 1 year after diagnosis were associated with increased mortality independent of treatment method (HR 1·55, 95% CI 1·08-2·24). Spline regressions showed a positive non-linear relationship between FT4 concentrations at 1 year and all-cause mortality.

INTERPRETATION

Regardless of the method of treatment, early and effective control of hyperthyroidism among patients with Graves' disease is associated with improved survival compared with less effective control. Rapid and sustained control of hyperthyroidism should be prioritised in the management of Graves' disease and early definitive treatment with radioiodine should be offered to patients who are unlikely to achieve remission with antithyroid drugs alone.

FUNDING

National Institute for Social Care and Health Research, Wales.

Laboratory Testing in Thyroid Conditions - Pitfalls and Clinical Utility

Thyroid disorders are common, affecting more than 10% of people in the US, and laboratory tests are integral in the management of these conditions. The repertoire of thyroid tests includes blood tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroglobulin antibodies (Tg-Ab), thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab), TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb), and calcitonin. TSH and free thyroid hormone tests are frequently used to assess the functional status of the thyroid. TPO-Ab and TRAb tests are used to diagnose Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease, respectively. Tg and calcitonin are important tumor markers used in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), respectively. Procalcitonin may replace calcitonin as a biomarker for MTC. Apart from understanding normal thyroid physiology, it is important to be familiar with the possible pitfalls and caveats in the use of these tests so that they can be interpreted properly and accurately. When results are discordant, clinicians and laboratorians should be mindful of possible assay interferences and/or the effects of concurrent medications. In addition, thyroid function may appear abnormal in the absence of actual thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and in critical illness. Hence, it is important to consider the clinical context when interpreting results. This review aims to describe the above-mentioned blood tests used in the diagnosis and management of thyroid disorders, as well as the pitfalls in their interpretation. With due knowledge and care, clinicians and laboratorians will be able to fully appreciate the clinical utility of these important laboratory tests.

Clinical utility of TSH receptor antibody levels in Graves' orbitopathy: a comparison of two TSH receptor antibody immunoassays

Introduction

Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibodies (TRAB) play a role in the development of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO), and measurements of the TRAB level may be helpful in monitoring GO treatment.

Aim of the study

To assess the correlation of TRAB levels measured with two different assays: third-generation TRAB assay (TRAB Cobas) and novel Immulite assay (TRAB Immulite), in patients with moderate-to-severe GO treated with intravenous glucocorticoid pulse therapy (ivGCs).

Material and methods

Forty patients with active, moderate-to-severe GO underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation before, in the middle, and after ivGCs therapy. The correlation of TRAB levels with GO signs was evaluated. Laboratory and clinical findings were compared according to the response to ivGCs. TRAB concentration was measured with Immulite TSI assay and with Elecsys IMA.

Results

All patients were TRAB positive in both assays at the beginning of the treatment. The decrease of both TRAB Immulite and Cobas levels in serum during ivGCs was statistically significant. We observed strong correlation between both TRAB levels before and after ivGCs. There was no statistically significant difference in antibody levels between patients with good response and no response to the treatment. We did not find any correlation between antibody levels and GO features before the therapy, but measurements during ivGCs showed comparable correlation of both TRAB levels with GO activity.

Conclusions

We found similarity between Immulite assay and third-generation TRAB assay in the assessment of patients with GO treated with ivGCs. Both TRAB levels showed comparable correlation with GO activity during ivGCs therapy.