A comparison of direct measures of glycaemia and glycated blood proteins in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

We have studied associations between various direct measures of glycaemia and glycated blood proteins in 113 subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), and examined whether or not the 'fructosamine' assay results were affected by differing patient serum concentrations of lipids, albumin or C peptide. Serum fructosamine correlated less closely with HbA1 (r = 0.44) than did HbA1 with glycated serum albumin (GSA) (r = 0.68). Serum fructosamine and GSA also were poorly correlated (r = 0.48). Although fructosamine, HbA1 and GSA correlated to a similar degree with fasting blood glucose (r range 0.34 to 0.37), GSA was most closely related to mean blood glucose (r = 0.39 vs. 0.30-0.35) and the M value (a marker of diurnal glycaemic instability) (r = 0.42 vs. 0.33-0.35). The serum concentration of fructosamine was not significantly affected by a variation in serum cholesterol, but tended to be lower in subjects with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (p = 0.05). The fructosamine assay may be altered by moderately lipaemic serum but is not affected by serum albumin concentration in normoalbuminaemic patients with IDDM. Our study indicates, however, that GSA is a more reliable marker of short-term glycaemic control in IDDM than fructosamine.

Long-term performance of the fructosamine assay

We have investigated the long-term performance of the fructosamine assay based on secondary glycated protein standards and attempted to define the interpretation of varying degrees of increase in fructosamine concentration in comparison to haemoglobin A1 (HbA1) values both in insulin dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin dependent (NIDDM) diabetic patients. Between-batch imprecision of fructosamine over 5 months was (CV) 2.5% at 2.09 mmol/L, 2.8% at 3.52 mmol/L and 3.6% at 4.14 mmol/L. Variation of fructosamine concentration in vivo in stable diabetic patients monitored over 8-18 weeks was 2.3% to 7.1%. Fructosamine correlated with HbA1 both in IDDM (n = 110, r = 0.701, P less than 0.001) and NIDDM (n = 71, r = 0.764, P less than 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity of fructosamine for the prediction of degree of control assessed on the basis of HbA1 level (cut-off point for good vs. poor control, HbA1 = 10%) was determined. In NIDDM, specificity above 90% was achieved at a fructosamine concentration of 3.4 mmol/L with a corresponding sensitivity of 64.1%. 22.5% of patients were classified differently on the basis of fructosamine as compared to HbA1. In IDDM, specificity over 90% was achieved at 3.8% mmol/L fructosamine with a sensitivity of 35%. Discordancy rate between HbA1 and fructosamine based assessment of control was 31.8%. The assessment of diabetic control based on fructosamine may be different from that based on HbA1, particularly in IDDM. Fructosamine and HbA1 should be used as complementary rather than alternative tests.

The effect of calibration on the between-laboratory variation of serum fructosamine

Human pooled serum from diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, and calibrators containing glycated protein or 1-deoxy-1-morpholinofructose (DMF) in a variety of matrices, were distributed to 10 laboratories. When they used their own assay conditions and calibrators, the inter-laboratory variation was unacceptably high. However, when the pool from diabetic patients was reassayed using a calibrator with an assigned value prepared from freeze-dried human serum, and containing no DMF, inter-laboratory variation was reduced significantly. Inter-laboratory agreement for the pool from non-diabetic subjects remained poor despite recalibration. Recalibration using either serum or albumin based solutions of DMF as calibrator failed to effect any significant reductions in inter-laboratory variation. Secondary calibrators based on a protein matrix with no added DMF are recommended for routine use.

Does the measurement of serum fructosamine accurately reflect levels of glycated albumin in insulin-dependent diabetes?

We have measured serum glycated albumin (GSA) by affinity chromatography and immunoturbidimetry, and serum fructosamine using a Cobas FARA analyser in blood samples from 37 type I diabetics and 21 healthy controls. Random blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin levels were also measured. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1) correlated with glycated albumin and fructosamine in the diabetic group. A less clear relationship was found between glycated albumin and fructosamine. HbA1, GSA and fructosamine correlated poorly with random blood glucose levels. These data indicate that serum fructosamine levels do not accurately reflect those of glycated albumin, as has recently been suggested, in type I insulin-dependent diabetics where glycaemic control fluctuates more than in type II diabetics. It is postulated that the two methods reflect varying glycaemic levels to a different degree, thereby accounting for the disparity.