Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential

Autogenous Periosteal Graft Along with Open Flap Debridement Versus Open Flap Debridement Alone for the Treatment of Grade II Furcation Defect in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Periodontal regeneration involves techniques intended at restoring the lost supporting tissue around a periodontally weakened tooth. These regenerative methods frequently utilize periosteal grafts to stimulate the evolvement of vital adjacent tissues. This paper intended to evaluate the use of autogenous periosteal grafts in treating grade II furcation defects (Glickman Classification 1953) in patients with chronic periodontitis. Materials and Methods: The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, EBSCO, and Google Scholar were searched for papers published in English from January 1991 till December 2022. Three individuals examined the reclaimed articles according to the inclusion norms. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of autogenous periosteal grafts for treating Grade II furcation defects in chronic periodontitis patients were involved. Only four related studies were identified for data extraction, involving 80 patients aged 18 to 52 years. Outcome variables measured included horizontal bone loss (HD), vertical bone loss (VD), pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone height (BH), gingival recession (GR), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). Data were examined using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were employed to estimate effect sizes. Results: Both groups showed similar results for reductions in PI, GI, and BOP. However, The periosteal graft also yielded better outcomes for CAL gain, BH, and GR. The meta-analysis showed a significant overall effect of Periosteal Barrier Membrane (PBM) on horizontal and vertical bony change levels, but subgroup differences between unilateral and bilateral applications were not statistically significant due to high heterogeneity. Although the bilateral subgroup demonstrated significant benefits of PBM treatment, the overall findings across the clinical attachment level group remain inconclusive. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that while PBM may benefit bilateral mandibular sites, and autogenous periosteal grafts offer no added advantage over OFD alone in Grade II furcation defects, the overall findings remain inconclusive.

Milestones in Mandibular Bone Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review of Large Animal Models and Critical-Sized Defects

Background/Objectives: Mandibular reconstruction following trauma or oncologic resection is crucial for restoring function and aesthetics. While autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard, it presents challenges such as donor site morbidity and graft availability. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) offers an innovative alternative, integrating scaffolds, osteogenic cells, and bioactive factors to regenerate functional bone. This systematic review evaluates BTE strategies for mandibular reconstruction, focusing on critical-sized defects in large animal models and their translational potential for clinical applications. Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies involved large animal models and critical-sized mandibular defects treated with at least two BTE components (scaffold, osteogenic cells, or growth factors). Quality and bias assessments were conducted using ARRIVE guidelines and SYRCLE tools. Results: Of the 6088 studies screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on critical-sized mandibular defects in large animal models such as pigs, sheep, and dogs. Common scaffolds included β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), and polycaprolactone (PCL), frequently combined with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and growth factors like recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Preclinical outcomes demonstrated effective bone regeneration, vascularization, and biomechanical restoration. Advanced strategies, including in vivo bioreactors and 3D-printed scaffolds, further enhanced regeneration. However, challenges such as incomplete scaffold degradation, hypoxic conditions within constructs, and variability in growth factor efficacy and dose optimization were observed, emphasizing the need for further refinement to ensure consistent outcomes. Conclusions: BTE shows promise in mandibular reconstruction, achieving bone regeneration and functional restoration in preclinical models of critical-sized defects. However, challenges such as scaffold optimization, vascularization enhancement, and protocol standardization require further investigation to facilitate clinical translation. These findings emphasize the need for refinement to achieve consistent, scalable outcomes for clinical use.

Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation

The management and reconstruction of critical-sized segmental bone defects remain a major clinical challenge for orthopaedic clinicians and surgeons. In particular, regenerative medicine approaches that involve incorporating stem cells within tissue engineering scaffolds have great promise for fracture management. This narrative review focuses on the primary components of bone tissue engineering-stem cells, scaffolds, the microenvironment, and vascularisation-addressing current advances and translational and regulatory challenges in the current landscape of stem cell therapy for critical-sized bone defects. To comprehensively explore this research area and offer insights for future treatment options in orthopaedic surgery, we have examined the latest developments and advancements in bone tissue engineering, focusing on those of clinical relevance in recent years. Finally, we present a forward-looking perspective on using stem cells in bone tissue engineering for critical-sized segmental bone defects.

Appraising and comparing the role of autogenous periosteal graft as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Periodontal regeneration refers to procedures aimed at restitution of lost supporting tissue around the periodontally compromised tooth. Regenerative procedures very often include the use of barrier materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal graft as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients. A total of four data bases MEDLINE (by PubMed), Cochrane database, EBSCO, and Google Scholar were explored to identify the studies in English up to December 2022. An additional hand search of relevant journals was also done. A team of three independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles using the inclusion criteria. Randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal grafts in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis cases were included in the study. A total of six relevant articles were recognized for data procurement. A total of 117 patients with 68 sites with an age range between 18 years and 55 years were selected. Outcome variables examined were pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), radiographic bone defect fill (BDF), gingival recession (GR), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Data were analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. The mean differences and 95% confidence interval were used to illustrate the estimate of effect size. There is an equal effect in both groups for the PI, GI, and BOP reduction. For PD reduction, the result was in the favor of periosteal graft with open flap debridement (OFD) group. For CAL gain, radiographic BDF and GR, results also favored the periosteal graft, but no statistically significant difference was found amongst the groups. Within the limitation of the study, it seems that the autogenous periosteal graft can be used successfully along with OFD to treat intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.

Recent advancement in vascularized tissue-engineered bone based on materials design and modification

Bone is one of the most vascular network-rich tissues in the body and the vascular system is essential for the development, homeostasis, and regeneration of bone. When segmental irreversible damage occurs to the bone, restoring its vascular system by means other than autogenous bone grafts with vascular pedicles is a therapeutic challenge. By pre-generating the vascular network of the scaffold in vivo or in vitro, the pre-vascularization technique enables an abundant blood supply in the scaffold after implantation. However, pre-vascularization techniques are time-consuming, and in vivo pre-vascularization techniques can be damaging to the body. Critical bone deficiencies may be filled quickly with immediate implantation of a supporting bone tissue engineered scaffold. However, bone tissue engineered scaffolds generally lack vascularization, which requires modification of the scaffold to aid in enhancing internal vascularization. In this review, we summarize the relationship between the vascular system and osteogenesis and use it as a basis to further discuss surgical and cytotechnology-based pre-vascularization strategies and to describe the preparation of vascularized bone tissue engineered scaffolds that can be implanted immediately. We anticipate that this study will serve as inspiration for future vascularized bone tissue engineered scaffold construction and will aid in the achievement of clinical vascularized bone.

In Vivo Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies: Advances and Prospects

Reconstruction of critical-sized bone defects remains a tremendous challenge for surgeons worldwide. Despite the variety of surgical techniques, current clinical strategies for bone defect repair demonstrate significant limitations and drawbacks, including donor-site morbidity, poor anatomical match, insufficient bone volume, bone graft resorption, and rejection. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has emerged as a novel approach to guided bone tissue regeneration. BTE focuses on in vitro manipulations with seed cells, growth factors and bioactive scaffolds using bioreactors. The successful clinical translation of BTE requires overcoming a number of significant challenges. Currently, insufficient vascularization is the critical limitation for viability of the bone tissue-engineered construct. Furthermore, efficacy and safety of the scaffolds cell-seeding and exogenous growth factors administration are still controversial. The in vivo bioreactor principle (IVB) is an exceptionally promising concept for the in vivo bone tissue regeneration in a predictable patient-specific manner. This concept is based on the self-regenerative capacity of the human body, and combines flap prefabrication and axial vascularization strategies. Multiple experimental studies on in vivo BTE strategies presented in this review demonstrate the efficacy of this approach. Routine clinical application of the in vivo bioreactor principle is the future direction of BTE; however, it requires further investigation for overcoming some significant limitations.